No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Astoria Place Of Waterville

555 Anthony Wayne Trail, Waterville, OH 43566 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (419) 878-3901 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$350,464 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $350,464 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
900 Waterville Monclova Rd Ste A · (419) 878-3010 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1197 Farnsworth Rd · (419) 878-8518 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9533 Waterville Swanton Rd · (419) 878-7691 · Call to confirm hours
Park
743 S River Rd · (419) 878-7641 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1440 Waterville Monclova Rd · (419) 699-8548

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication42.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.5%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
47.6%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 62.6 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, county coroner interview, review of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, review of the death certificate, and review of the facility self-imposed action plan, including in-service records and audits, the facility failed to provide residents food in the correct texture to meet individual needs, failed to ensure residents were provided feeding assistance/supervision as required, and failed to put monitoring systems in place to prevent the same actions, situations, and/or practices from reoccurring. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for one (#83) resident who experienced serious life-threatening harm and negative health outcomes resulting in death when served the incorrect food item at snack time, subsequently choked, lost consciousness, and collapsed, requiring staff intervention to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and an emergency medical service response in an effort to remove the food bolus from the trachea where it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-08 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, hospice interview, review of the local weather conditions, emergency medical services (EMS) interview, review of the EMS run report, and review of hospital records, the facility failed to adequately assess, monitor, document, and address a decline in a resident's mental health. This resulted in Actual harm to Resident #09 when on the evening of 01/01/26, the resident did not sleep, appeared to be experiencing hallucinations, and was aggressive toward staff. Facility staff failed to notify the physician or implement any interventions throughout the night. Subsequently, on 01/02/26 at approximately 7:50 A.M., Resident #09 was found outside of the facility, after exiting from his room window and without appropriate clothing for the cold temperatures, in the snow. Consequently, Resident #09 was transferred to the hospital due hypothermia (body temperature falls below 95 degrees Fahrenheit [F]) and placed on an Emergency Application (an involuntary emergency evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility investigation, review of emergency medical service (EMS) and police reports, review of the county coroner case documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse. Actual harm occurred on 09/23/25 when Resident #29 was discovered in a resident room behind a closed door and Resident #53 was discovered in the same room behind a drawn privacy curtain laying supine on a sheet on the floor with towels secured tightly around the neck. Resident #53's head was purple in color, skin was cool to touch, with blood in her mouth, petechia to her skin, and no respirations or pulse were present. Resident #29 later admitted strangling Resident #53. The county coroner case documentation listed the cause of Resident #53's death as a homicide by means of strangulation. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for abuse in a facility census of 71. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a self-reported incident, review of an incident report, review of hospital records, review of staff statements, staff interview, staff job description, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted a resident with safe ambulation, report a resident fall, and ensure a resident was assessed for injuries prior to moving the resident after a fall, and ensure the resident's fall was thoroughly investigated. Additionally, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions. This resulted in Actual Harm on 02/12/25 when staff assisted Resident #47 to the bathroom without his walker, staff then picked the resident up off the floor after a fall, toileted the resident, and then walked the resident back to bed further increasing the risk for injury then never reported the fall to the nurse. The oncoming nursing shift later found the resident had bruising to the left lower lip and redness to the left side of the face and a displaced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy, review of the Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) database, facility investigation, review of hospital records, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #01, a resident with known history of resident-to-resident abuse incidents, struck Resident #02 in the face causing a hematoma (a pool of clotted blood that forms in the tissue) to her face and a closed fracture of the right orbital floor (one or more bones around the eyeball break, often from a blow to the face). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #03 was free from resident-to-resident physical abuse when Resident #01, who was supposed to be on one-to-one monitoring, struck Resident #03 in the back several times, while Resident #03 was asleep. This affected three (#01, #02 and #03) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The current census is 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the SRI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Certification, Licensure, and Survey (CALS) system (system for maintaining healthcare provider information), staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) of a resident elopement. This affected one (#09) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 60.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #09 was admitted on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included localization-related symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with simple partial seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, morbid obesity, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/26/25, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #09 did not have mood concerns or behaviors. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 01/02/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of a job description, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate administration over the facility when a resident died from a choking incident as a result of being provided unapproved food items. The facility subsequently put a corrective action plan into place that was not fully followed to prevent further episodes of resident's choking and prevent residents from receiving restricted food and drinks. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74.Findings Include:Interview on 08/12/25 at 1:47 P.M. with the Administrator, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) #401, and [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) #400 revealed after a choking incident on 09/30/24 that resulted in a resident's (#83) death when the resident was give food items that were restricted, the facility immediately implemented a self-imposed action plan (SIAP) to correct the deficiencies that contributed to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of water flushing logs, review of water monitoring logs, review of water temperature logs, staff interview, review of a water pH level reading document, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately and adequately conduct water monitoring for the prevention of Legionella within the facility. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents in the facility. The census was 74.Findings include: Review of the water flushing logs from January 2025 through August 2025 revealed no water lines were flushed in January, February, and March 2025. A comment written on the log for March 2025 revealed, all rooms in use 03/14/25. Further review revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] was flushed on 05/06/25 (marked as completed late for April 2025), room [ROOM NUMBER] was flushed on 05/16/25, 06/05/25, and 07/22/25, and room [ROOM NUMBER] was flushed on 08/04/25. Further review revealed no specifics regarding the faucet that was flushed or the duration of the flush.Review of the chlorine and pH monitoring levels in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-27 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure employees completed Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the employee file for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #320, CNA #306, CNA #305, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #383, and Registered Nurse (RN) #365 revealed none of the employees received training on the facility's QAPI program.Interview on 08/12/25 at 8:00 A.M. with CNA #371, LPN #381 on 08/12/25 at 10:10 A.M., and CNA #219 on 08/12/25 at 10:12 A.M. revealed none of the three staff members were aware of what QAPI was and had not been trained on it.Interview on 08/12/25 at 2:00 P.M. with Human Resource Manager #379 confirmed employees should have QAPI training upon hire and confirmed CNA #320, CNA #305, CNA #306, LPN #383, and RN #365 had no evidence of QAPI training in their employee files.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a homelike environment. This affected eight (#35, #82, #22, #36, #12, #81, #7, and #29) of eight residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Observation on 08/05/25 at 1:43 P.M. behind Resident #12's bedroom door revealed a large hole in the drywall at the door handle height. Also noted in the coinciding area behind the door right below the ceiling was a small hole in the drywall. In Resident #12's shared bathroom there was a waste basket under the sink, approximately one-quarter full of water.2. Observation on 08/05/25 at 1:43 P.M. of Resident #81's bedroom revealed a light above his bed with no cord to turn the light on. Resident #81 shared a bathroom with Resident #12 which had a waste basket under the sink, approximately one-quarter full of water.3. Observation on 08/05/25 at 1:49 P.M. of Resident #7 and Resident #35's room revealed large brown-colored areas of a substance throughout the entire ceiling.4. Observation on 08/05/25 at 1:51 P.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of shower schedules, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to choose when they receive their medications to prevent refusal and choose the time they shower. This affected two (#50 and #47) of two residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission of 06/10/25. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan dated 06/17/25 revealed Resident #47 received psychoactive medication due to alteration in mood and behavior. Resident #47 used psychotropic medication related to schizoaffective disorder. The nurse was to administer medications as ordered. Additional review of the care plan revealed Resident #47…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a personal funds balance statement, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided notification of spend down when personal funds were within $200.00 of the resource limit. This affected one (#51) of eight residents reviewed for personal fund accounts. The facility identified 41 residents with personal funds accounts. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 05/17/22. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #51's primary payer source was Medicaid. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #51's trial balance fund dated 08/11/25 revealed the resident had a personal funds account balance of $2,293.28. Interview on 08/11/25 at 4:42 P.M. Chief Nursing Officer Registered Nurse (CNORN) #401 verified the facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, review of self-reported incidents, staff interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate notifications were made for three (#1, #71, and #56) of seven residents reviewed for resident-to-resident interactions and change in condition. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 05/27/25 with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage, dementia, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/03/25, revealed Resident #1 had impaired cognition and impairment to one side of her upper extremity and one side of her lower extremity. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 01/04/22 with diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder, with Lewy bodies, stroke, pseudobulbar affect, dysarthria and anarthria. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (#6) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 38 residents as receiving antipsychotic medications. The facility census was 74.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 had an admission date of 04/02/25. Diagnoses included conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and depression.Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had impaired cognition.Review of a physician order dated 04/02/25 revealed Resident #6 had an order for olanzapine 2.5 milligrams by mouth at bedtime for antipsychotic. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation of a supporting diagnoses for the use of the antipsychotic medication olanzapine. Interview on 08/06/25 at 1:47 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission. This affected three (#52, #15, #53) of 31 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #52 had an admission date of 01/10/25. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed there was no baseline care plan initiated within the first 48 hours of admission to the facility. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia with fluctuations, type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, essential hypertension, and hypothyroidism. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely develop comprehensive care plans. This affected two (#6 and #16) of 31 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 07/09/25 with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/16/25, revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition and used tobacco. Review of the admission packet, dated 07/09/25, revealed Resident #16 smoked, required supervision during smoking, and needed the facility to store his lighter and cigarettes. Further review revealed a care plan for safety revealed Resident #16 was at risk for injury. Goals were to maintain a safe environment during smoking and Resident #16 would comply with facility smoking policy. Review of the facility's list…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received adequate nail care. This affected two (#40 and #45) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive communication dysfunctions.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/16/25, revealed Resident #40 was unable to complete the assessment interview. Review of the care plan, revised 01/04/24, revealed Resident #40 had a behavior problem including playing in her own feces. Review of the care plan, revised on 11/11/24, revealed Resident #40 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received splints and immobilizer devices as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#1) of one residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 05/27/25 with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage, dementia, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/03/25, revealed Resident #1 had impaired cognition and an impairment to one side of her upper extremity and one side of her lower extremity. Resident #1 used a wheelchair for mobility.Review of the care plan updated 07/08/25 revealed Resident #1 had limited physical mobility due to decreased range of motion. Interventions included ensuring Resident #1's left arm was in a sling except at bedtime and bathing.Review of a physician order initiated 05/30/25 revealed Resident #1 should receive a Cock-up wrist splint to the left wrist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately assess a resident following an unwitnessed fall and failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a resident from consuming food not in their diet. This affected two (#56 and #38) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #56 used a walker to ambulate and required supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 07/15/25 revealed Resident #56 was at risk for falls and potential injury related to psychoactive drug use, and staff were to minimize the potential risk factors related to falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident urinary tract infection was timely and appropriately treated; and failed to ensure a urinary catheter was patent and functioning properly. This affected two (#69 and #81) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder concerns. The facility identified three residents with urinary tract infections and six residents with urinary catheters. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, depression, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had intact cognition. The resident was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for toileting.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed timely notify the physician of abnormal laboratory results. This affected one (#69) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder concerns. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, depression, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #69's physician order dated 07/22/25 revealed an order for a urinalysis with culture if indicated for dysuria. The nurse was to collect the urine and place in the laboratory refrigerator and follow up with result in three days. Review of a nurses note dated 07/24/25 at 9:01 A.M. revealed the nurse was unable to collect a urinary specimen as Resident #69 was unable to produce enough specimen. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adaptive equipment with meals as ordered. This affected one (#15) of one residents reviewed for adaptive equipment at meals. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia with fluctuations, type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, essential hypertension, and hypothyroidism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/28/25, revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan, revised 06/22/25, revealed Resident #15 had a nutritional concern and required adaptive equipment for meals. Interventions included weighted built up utensils, two handled cup, and separate bowl for all meals.Review of the physician order, dated 07/02/25, revealed Resident #15 was ordered a regular diet, regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate resident medical records. This affected one (#20) of three residents reviewed for medical record content. The facility census was 74.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right side, Parkinson ' s disease, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and dysphagia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/27/25, revealed Resident #20 had unclear speech, was not orientated to time, used wheelchair, required setup assistance for eating, toileting, and personal hygiene, and needed substantial assistance for shower, dressing, and transfers.Review of the care plan, dated 06/09/25, revealed Resident #20 was at possible nutritional risk due to comorbidities and has hemiplegia and hemiparesis to right dominate side related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and interview, physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were appropriately prescribed for urinary tract infections. This affected three (#69, #5, and #24) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility identified seven residents as receiving antibiotics. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, depression, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had intact cognition. The resident was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for toileting. Review of Resident #69's urinalysis laboratory report dated 08/02/25 revealed a urine specimen was collected on 07/30/25 and received by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received education prior to accepting or refusing a pneumococcal vaccination. This affected two (#3 and #38) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccination. The census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/28/13 with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, heart disease, hyperlipidemia, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/03/25, revealed Resident #3 had intact cognition.Review of the immunization history for Resident #3 revealed she received the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) 20 on 12/15/23.2. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 12/28/23 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/07/25, revealed Resident #38 had mildly impaired cognition. Review of the immunization history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff schedule review, timesheet review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked for eight hours daily in the facility. This affected all 68 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the staff schedules and timesheets for May 2015 revealed no RN coverage on 05/11/25. Interview on 06/18/25 at 10:38 A.M. with Regional Clinical Support #500 confirmed there was no evidence an RN worked in the facility on 05/11/25. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00165936.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a Safety Data Sheet (SDS), the facility failed to ensure appropriate cleaning agents were used to clean residents rooms and common areas. This affected 32 (#11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, and #42) residents on the upstairs unit. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview on 06/17/25 at 10:28 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the Housekeeper Supervisor was on vacation for the week. Observation and interview on 06/17/25 at 11:46 A.M. revealed Housekeeper #302 used products she personally purchased to clean the facility. Housekeeper #302 stated the chemical supplies were on the first floor of the facility and because she worked on the second floor she felt it was easier to purchase her own chemical cleaning supplies so she did not have to go downstairs when she needed to refresh her mop and/or rag buckets with new cleaning solution. Housekeeper #302 showed two products with the brand name Pinalen. One…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) database, review of policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely report allegations of resident-to-resident abuse. This affected three (#01, #02, and #03) of three residents reviewed for abuse reporting of allegations of abuse. The current census is 76. Findings include: Review of the Self-Reported Incident dated 08/14/24 at 5:33 P.M., revealed the incident was reported on 08/09/24 at 6:35 P.M., when Resident #01 was seen grabbing Resident #02's hair and punching her in the face. Per the SRI, the facility separated the residents, sent Resident #02 to the hospital, then upon return placed both residents in 15-minute checks until Resident #02 was transferred to another unit. Per the SRI report, the police were notified but no report was made, and no charges were filed. The SRI was unsubstantiated for abuse due to Resident #01's diagnosis of dementia. Review of the facility's investigation into the resident-to-resident abuse dated 08/09/24 to 08/16/24 revealed no evidence the incident was reported to the SRI database on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, community staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with food in the form and texture as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#80) of three residents reviewed for altered texture diets. The census was 84. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, mild intellectual disabilities, post traumatic stress disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #80's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]) revealed the resident was assessed with a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #80's physician orders revealed she was prescribed a mechanical soft diet with no bread due to her diagnosis of dysphagia and being a choking risk. Resident #80 was readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay on 10/24/23, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications and failed to ensure the medication refrigerator in the medication room was used only for medication storage. This had the potential to affect nine (#7, #17, #19, #35, #48, #51, #53, #62, and #67) of nine residents the facility identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile an undetermined number of residents who could receive the tuberculin solution. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 12/04/23 from 2:05 P.M. to 2:33 P.M., revealed a sealed large brown plastic bag on the top of nurse's station top desk left unattended. On the outside of the plastic bag was an itemized inventory sheet of the contents inside the sealed large brown plastic bag that revealed the large brown plastic bag contained resident prescription medications. Further observation revealed the following staff and residents walked by the unattended large brown bag: four unknown State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA), 10 unknown residents, two Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure drinking cups were adequately cleaned. This affected 28 (#2, #3, #4, #6, #13, #15, #20, #24, #25, #29, #30, #34, #38, #39, #40, #42, #43, #46, #47, #49, #56, #66, #68, #73, #75, #79, #80 and #81) of 29 residents in the A hall. The facility identified one resident (#72) to receive no food by mouth. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 12/06/23 at 12:20 P.M., of the lunch meal service revealed a tray of empty drinking cups to be served to the residents on the A hall for lunch. The empty cups appeared dirty with speckles of pink remnants. Interview on 12/06/23 at 12:18 P.M., with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #119 and STNA #187 verified the drinking cups brought by the dietary staff appeared to be dirty. STNA #119 and STNA #187 stated the glasses are always dirty. Subsequent observation revealed the STNAs made no effort to have the cups returned to the kitchen to be cleaned and waited for the lunch meal to arrive. Interview on 12/06/23 at 12:23 P.M., with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, training record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a COVID positive environment. This had the potential to affect the remaining COVID negative residents on the second floor 21 (#9, #10, #12, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #28, #31, #35, #44, #48, #50, #53, #54, #57, #62, #63, #65, #76) of 21 residents the on the second floor. The facility census was 81. Findings included. Observation on 12/04/23 at 5:20 P.M. revealed staff were passing meal trays for dinner. Residents #51 and #67 were roommates and were both COVID positive and had been walking around in the hallway without PPE on. Residents were instructed to go to their rooms for the meal tray to be delivered and residents followed the instructions. After waiting residents became restless and began to argue about who would get their food and why one resident was standing in the doorway waiting for food. Residents were over 5 feet apart and were not gesturing toward each other State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected one (Resident #72) of 81 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparases following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hypokalemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/06/23, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, incontinent, and was dependent for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, showering/bathing, and putting on/taking off footwear. Resident #72 had one venous/arterial ulcer. Observation on 12/06/23 at 9:19 A.M., revealed numerous streaks of unknown reddish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely identify and treat new skin impairment. This affected one (Resident #72) of one resident reviewed for potential skin impairment. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hypokalemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/06/23, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, incontinent, and was dependent for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, showering/bathing, and putting on/taking off footwear. Resident #72 had one venous/arterial ulcer. Review of care plan, dated 10/02/23 and revised on 10/25/23, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided to a resident with closed urinary drainage system to maintain the closed system to prevent potential infections. This affected one (#53) of one residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified four current residents with catheters. The facility census was 81. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 02/07/23. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, cerebral infarct, vascular dementia, diabetes, urine retention and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident 53 was cognitively impaired and was rarely if ever understood and required partial to moderate assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the care plan dated 11/16/23 revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter with interventions to ensure it was placed below the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nutritional status was being routinely being assessed by a registered dietician; accurately assess and obtain weights; and timely notify the physician and dietician of significant weight changes. This affected two (#7 and #51) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed a re-admission date of 05/07/23. Diagnoses included epileptic seizures, intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively impaired and required supervision assistance with transfers and mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 10/12/23 revealed Resident #7 revealed resident had potential for a nutritional problem related to severe hand tremors and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-08-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of the resident council concerns, and the facility extermination contractor documentation, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to address flying insects. This affected all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observations on 08/23/21 at 9:20 A.M. noted several gnats flying in the corridor and clinging to the corridor wall outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation inside room [ROOM NUMBER] noted a tray of food items with gnats swarming the food and the resident seated in bed. Located at the nurses station near room [ROOM NUMBER] identified several gnats flying and clinging to the wall above the medication cart. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 at the time verified gnats were present in the facility, disruptive to the environment, and residents. Further observation located inside room [ROOM NUMBER] noted the resident in bed two with tube feeding infusing. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with dignified assistance eating during meals. This affected one resident (#14) of four identified as dependent on staff for eating. In addition, the facility to ensure clothing protectors were used in a dignified manner. This affected four additional residents (#23, #58, #65, #171) who were provided clothing protection during meals. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, low back pain, symbolic dysfunction, major depression, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, insomnia, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, psychosis, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and cerebral infarction. According to the most current minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #14 was identified with severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident meals were provided in a homelike fashion. This deficient practice affected 12 residents (#53, #62, #30, #48, #44, #29, #42, #14, #56, #15, #01, and #08) of 24 residents who resided on the unit who were observed during the lunch meal service. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observation on 08/23/21 at 12:30 P.M. noted the state tested nurse aide (STNA) #300 and #306 delivered lunch meal trays to the residents in the [NAME] Edge units. The STNA #300 and #306 placed the food trays in front of the residents (#53, #62, #30, #48, #44, #29, #42, #14, #56, #15, #01, and #08) and had not removed the utensils or dinnerware (plates or cups) from the tray. Leaving the residents with an institutional style of meal service. Interview on 08/23/21 at 1:02 P.M., the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 revealed the resident meal service included leaving the trays under resident dinnerware. This has been the practice of the unit for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to store foods in a safe and sanitary manner. This had potential to affect 69 out of 72 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#06, #09, and #11) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observation on 08/23/21 at 8:10 A.M. of the dry storage area revealed significantly dented cans including 106 ounce canned tropical salad, 117 ounce canned jellied cranberry sauce, and 106 ounce canned diced peaches. Observation on 08/23/21 at 8:16 A.M. of the refrigerator revealed a box of shelled eggs with best by date of 06/20/21, 43 fat free half pint milk with a sell by date of 08/20/21, gallon of milk sell by date of 08/21/21, a box of Idaho potatoes with fuzzy light and dark mold like substance, and a box of cucumbers with fuzzy dark mold like substance. Interview on 08/20/21 at 8:23 A.M., the Dietary Staff #302 verified the dented cans and expired food in the refrigerator. Review of facility policy, Storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of facility policies, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) COVID-19 Positivity Rates, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website the facility staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing direct care for a resident who was on a COVID-19 quarantine, failed to maintain COVID-19 quarantine for a newly admitted resident with unknown COVID-19 status and not fully vaccinated. This directly affected two residents (#171 and #221) of two residents observed on COVID-19 transmission-based precautions This had the potential to affect 27 residents (#04, #05, #07, #12 #17, #18, #19, #20, #25, #27, #33, #34, #39, #41, #43, #45, #47, #49, #51, #55 #59, #60, #61, #63, #67, #69, and #70) who resided on the Cedar Pines Unit. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed while staff assisted a dependent resident with feeding. This affected one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered unopened to residents. This affected one resident (#43) and had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 10/20/17. Diagnosis included bipolar disorder current episode depressed severe with psychotic features, hyperlipidemia, unspecified atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic kidney disease, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, essential (primary) hypertension, unspecified asthma, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder current episode depressed moderate, bipolar disorder current episode manic severe with psychotic features, and osteoarthritis left shoulder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the resident and resident's representative in writing the reason for a transfer to the hospital. This affected one resident (#19) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility identified 19 residents who were hospitalized in the last three months. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/19. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, cellulitis of the lower limb, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial flutter, and heart failure. Review of a nursing progress note dated 08/13/21 revealed Resident #19 was noted with redness and increased swelling to her left leg which required an evaluation in the hospital. Review of the Discharge - return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #19 was discharged on 08/13/21 to an acute hospital. Review of a nursing progress note dated 08/19/21 revealed Resident #19 returned to the facility at 5:45 P.M. Review of Resident #19's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide the resident and resident's representative with the facility's bed hold policy for a transfer to the hospital. This affected one resident (#19) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility identified 19 residents who were hospitalized in the last three months. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/19. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, cellulitis of the lower limb, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial flutter, and heart failure. Review of a nursing progress note dated 08/13/21 revealed Resident #19 was noted with redness and increased swelling to her left leg which required an evaluation in the hospital. Review of a Discharge - return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #19 was discharged on 08/13/21 to an acute hospital. Review of a nursing progress note dated 08/19/21 revealed Resident #19 returned to the facility at 5:45 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual, the facility inaccurately coded residents for anticoagulant medications. This affected two residents (#13 and #38) of three residents reviewed for anticoagulant use coded on the MDS assessment. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1). Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anemia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, hyperlipidemia, and delirium. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was coded as receiving an anticoagulant medication seven days of the seven day look-back period. Review of Resident #13's medication administration record (MAR) for May 2021 revealed Resident #13 received no anticoagulant medications during the month. Further review of the May 2021 MAR revealed Resident #13 received the antiplatelet medication aspirin during the seven day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to change oxygen supplies as ordered. This affected one resident (#69) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #69 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included essential (primary) hypertension, schizophrenia unspecified, major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms, constipation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, other cerebrovascular disease, and unspecified osteoarthritis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had not received oxygen treatment. Review of the discontinued physician orders, dated 01/31/21 to 07/05/21, revealed an order for Resident #69's oxygen tubing and bag should be changed every night shift on Sunday. The order specified to ensure to date and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen. This affected one resident (#69) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #69 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included essential (primary) hypertension, schizophrenia unspecified, major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms, constipation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, other cerebrovascular disease, and unspecified osteoarthritis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident does not receive oxygen treatment. Review of the discontinued physician orders dated 03/11/20 to 07/05/21, revealed the Resident #69 received oxygen one to three liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-08-26 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and review of the Employee Handbook the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) received a 90 day or annual evaluation for three (#155, #160, #165) of three STNA personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 72 residing in the facility. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of STNA #304's personnel file revealed a hire date of 04/28/21. Further review of the employee file had no documentation a 90-day evaluation was completed. Review of STNA #306's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/17/20. Further review of the employee file had no documentation an annual evaluation was completed. Review of STNA #310's personnel file revealed a hire date of 04/02/18. Further review of the employee file revealed the most recent performance evaluation was completed on 03/25/19. Interview on 08/26/21 at 11:35 A.M., the Administrator verified STNA #304 had not had a 90-day evaluation and STNA #306, and #310 had not had an annual performance review evaluation. Review of the Employee Handbook,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$350,464 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $290,575 — penalty dated 2026-01-08
  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-08-27
  • $24,928 — penalty dated 2025-08-27
  • $17,616 — penalty dated 2025-03-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-24 for 58 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OH CARE EQUITY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/12/2019
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF35%since 01/01/2025
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CERTUS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2026
DAIBER, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HUTCHINS, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$776K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 1%Other / private 27%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $776K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$243per resident / day
operating cost
$7,385per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$269per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365747. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next