No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cityview Healthcare And Rehabilitation

6606 Carnegie Ave, Cleveland, OH 44103 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 146 certified beds · (216) 361-1414 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse4 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$124,639 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $124,639 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5805 Euclid Ave, OB/GYN · (216) 844-3936 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5805 Euclid Avenue, Second Floor · (216) 675-6640 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6610 Euclid Ave · (216) 881-0045 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4614 Prospect Ave · (216) 391-7482 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.5%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.5%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.0%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication9.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
48.4%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 88.1 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-07)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed record review, review of emergency services report, review of hospital records, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment to prevent Resident #51 from accessing a locked soiled utility room and falling from the third-floor secured unit to the facility basement via a laundry chute. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 08/07/25 at approximately 1:30 P.M. when Resident #51 was observed in the laundry chute room, inside a laundry bin, behind a locked door in the facility's basement. Maintenance Director (MD) #400 reported he had been in the facility basement outside of the laundry chute room when he heard a loud thud sound from inside the room. Upon opening the locked door of the laundry chute room, MD #400 observed Resident #51 inside a laundry bin, and confirmed the only points of entry into the room were the laundry chute and the locked door he had opened. MD #400 recalled Resident #51 had bleeding around his mouth and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-13 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, closed medical record review, review of an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) report, review of medical examiner records, facility policy review and interviews with facility staff, Medical Director, Certified Nurse Practitioners (CNP) #332 and #334, the facility failed develop and implement comprehensive, individualized and effective interventions/treatment and services to meet the behavioral health care needs of Resident #93 and to assist the resident to attain/maintain his highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/death on [DATE] when Resident #93, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, dementia, anxiety, antisocial personality, hallucinations, body dysmorphic disorder and history of suicide attempt was found unresponsive in a communal shower room as a result of a self-inflicted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from a potential accident hazard when smoking materials were not secured to prevent unsafe smoking in resident rooms. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious harm, injury and/or death on [DATE] at 1:03 P.M. when Resident #38, who was assessed to require staff supervision and the use of a smoking apron (device worn to protect from burns caused by hot ashes or lit cigarettes) was observed alone in his room with a strong cigarette odor and visible cigarette smoke in the air. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #300 verified the odor and presence of smoke in Resident #38's room and further stated Resident #37, who was Resident #38's roommate and away from the facility at the time of the observation, had been seen previously smoking in the room. Additionally, Resident #37 and Resident #38's bathroom had cigarette ashes on the floor, burn marks on the toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) records, hospital record review, review of the facility Elopement and Secure Unit policy and procedures and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and individualized interventions to prevent Resident #87 from eloping from the third floor secured behavioral unit. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 09/02/23 at approximately 9:00 P.M. when Resident #87, with a known history of elopement and poor judgement and insight, was last seen by facility staff before eloping from the facility third floor secure behavioral unit without staff knowledge. Actual serious harm/injury occurred when Resident #87 exited the window of his third story room and either jumped/fell to the ground or descended via a ledge to a first story rooftop before jumping/falling to the ground. Resident #87 was not identified as missing from the facility until 09/03/23 at approximately 6:00 A.M. when he was observed outside the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed medical record review, review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, review of American Diabetes Association guidance, review of the facility policy for wound care, review of the facility diabetes clinical protocol and interview, the facility failed to implement an individualized and effective plan of care to prevent the development of a foot ulcer for Resident #107, who was admitted with intact skin, identified to be a risk for pressure ulcer development and had co-morbidities including diabetes and diabetic neuropathy, peripheral circulatory disorders, renal failure and was visually impaired requiring extensive assistance of one staff with bed mobility and staff supervision for dressing and personal hygiene. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm to Resident #107 beginning on 03/01/23 when the resident reported foot pain and his shoes feeling too small without staff assessment or interventions. The resident subsequently developed an ulcer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, interview, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect Resident #69 and Resident #12's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #89. This affected two residents (#12 and #69) of five residents reviewed for physical abuse. The facility census was 88. Actual harm occurred on 09/08/25 when Resident #69 was physically abused by Resident #89 when the resident was struck in the head with a [NAME] requiring transfer to the hospital for evaluation and treatment of a skin tear requiring a thick layer of dermal glue and bruising on the left eye. Additional harm occurred on 09/19/25 when Resident #12 was physically abused by Resident #89 when the resident was struck in the head with a rock which required hospital treatment for a head laceration with staples. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent spoilage and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and cooking equipment. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 91. Findings include:1. Observation during the tour of the kitchen on 03/30/26 from 7:54 A.M. to 8:15 A.M. revealed a moderate amount of dried white splatter on the backside of the stove. Observed on the tray that sat between the stove top and oven had various food items such as corn on it and once the tray was removed revealed dried brown stains. Observed on the silver plate portion of the wall to the right of the three compartment sink had a moderate amount of various, dried food splatter. Interview on 03/30/26 at approximately 8:10 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #611 verified the above findings. 2. Observation on 04/02/26 at 9:56 A.M. of the nursing unit refrigerator on the third floor revealed a moderated amount of dried brown splatter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-07 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Quality Assurance (QA) meeting sign-in sheets and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director and the Administrator were active participants and attended QA meetings as required. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the Quality Assurance (QA) committee meeting sign-in sheets revealed the facility Medical Director and the Administrator did not attend the first quarter (03/06/25), second quarter (05/02/25), and third quarter (08/08/25) meetings.Interview with the current Administrator verified the Medical Director and former Administrator did not attend quarterly QA Committee meetings as required in an interview on 04/06/26 at 1:50 P.M.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-07 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain documentation in the staff files indicating the staff were provide education related to the COVID-19 vaccination and offered the vaccination. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Record review and interview on 04/06/26 at 8:44 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Infection Control Nurse #617 revealed staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccines and education was provided on COVID-19 annually. LPN Infection Control Nurse #617 revealed she would have to find the education provided and the tracking log for the staff COVID-19 vaccines.Interview on 04/06/26 at 11:21 A.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #613 revealed she was employed at the facility for four years and did not receive education on COVID-19 over the past year. CNA #613 stated the facility offered the staff an influenza (flu) vaccine, but not the COVID-19 vaccine. Interview on 04/06/26 at 11:22 A.M. with LPN #593 revealed the facility provided education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1. Observation during an environmental tour conducted with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #617 on 04/02/26 between 9:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. revealed the room occupied by Resident #11 and Resident #86 had a hole in the bathroom ceiling. The soap dispenser in the room occupied by Resident #52 and Resident #74 was detached from the wall and observed lying on top of the closet door, leaving multiple holes in the wall. The wedge pillow utilized by Resident #89 was heavily soiled with visible dirt and debris. The rooms occupied by Resident #46 and Resident #68 had multiple large cracks across several floor tiles. The rooms occupied by Resident #11, Resident #46, Resident #68, and Resident #86 had an unidentified substance on the floor, resulting in a sticky surface. The room occupied by Resident #71 had a hole in the wall with a cable cord fed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas were maintained at comfortable temperatures to promote a safe and comfortable homelike environment. This had the potential to affect 24 (#1, #3, #7, #13, #14, #16, #18, #23, #41, #42, #43, #46, #53, #58, #66, #67, #68, #71, #73, #76, #78, #79, #81, and #83) of 24 residents residing on the Blue Sky Living Unit (400 Hall). The facility census was 91.Findings include:Interview with Resident #1 on 03/20/26 at 9:08 A.M. revealed his room was often too warm.Interview with Resident #53 on 03/20/26 at 9:11 A.M. revealed his room was really warm.Interview with Resident #3 on 03/20/26 at 9:15 A.M. revealed she had to tell staff all the time that her room was too warm.Observation and interview of the 400 Hall on 03/20/26 between 8:45 A.M. and 9:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 revealed Resident #14's room measured 88 degrees Fahrenheit (F), Resident #1's room measured 85.6 degrees F, Resident #88's room measured 86.5 degrees F, Resident #71's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to specify resident care needs. This affected five (#9, #20, #44, #64, and #80) of 30 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 91.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 01/03/26 and diagnoses including displaced fracture of the surgical neck of the right humerus, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, insomnia, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of a physician's order dated 01/03/26 revealed Resident #9 had an order for sliding scale insulin coverage for diabetes mellitus. Review of a physician's order dated 01/05/26 revealed Resident #9 had an order for furosemide (diuretic medication) for weight gain and leg swelling. Review of a physician's order dated 02/05/26 revealed Resident #9 had an order for Januvia for diabetes mellitus. Review of a physician's order dated 02/15/26 revealed Resident #9 had an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, and review of a facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure residents received large portions according to their diet orders. This had the potential to affect 34 (#4, #5, #7, #11, #14, #15, #17, #19, #20, #28, #36, #38, #39, #40, #44, #47, #48, #49, #52, #54, #55, #57, #62, #63, #64, #70, #76, #77, #82, #85, #86, #87, #88, and #90) of 91 residents who received large portions. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 12/05/25 revealed resident complaints regarding the food included not getting what they were supposed to get. On 01/05/26 there were complaints of not having enough food on the plate and making sure there were enough portions and the menus matching. On 02/05/26 there were complaints for not receiving enough food and on 03/05/26 there were complaints of not having enough food and making sure there were enough food portions. Observation on 04/02/26 at 1:21 P.M. of the lunch tray line meal service revealed Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of personnel records, review of employee timesheets, and review of the employee handbook, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a dignified living environment. This affected one (#17) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/17/18 and diagnoses including paraplegia, end stage renal disease, accidental discharge from a firearm or gun, aneurysm of a renal artery, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation dated 10/22/25 revealed Resident #17's BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition.Interview on 03/30/26 at 10:22 A.M. with Resident #17 confirmed he observed a physical altercation between staff members a couple months ago but was unable to remember the exact date. Resident #17 stated he did not want to talk about the fight but stated it could have been avoided.Interview on 04/02/26 at 1:44 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice for bathing method and frequency was honored. This affected one (#89) of four residents reviewed for bathing preferences/schedule. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Record review for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 06/06/18. Diagnosis included spastic diplegic, cerebral palsy, polyneuropathy, spina bifida, and muscle weakness. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #87 revealed it was very important to the resident to choose between a tub bath, bed bath, or sponge bath. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact. Resident #89 had impairment on both sides of the upper and lower extremities. Resident #89 used a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent for showers/bathing, personal hygiene, and chair/bed to chair transfers. Review of the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a clinical census, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a legal guardian was notified of a change in condition. This affected one (#49) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 11/08/23 and diagnoses including dementia, depressive type schizoaffective disorder, impulse disorder, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and generalized anxiety disorder.Review of the undated guardianship letter revealed legal guardianship was awarded to Resident #49's sister.Review of a progress note dated 01/07/26 at 9:38 A.M. revealed Resident #49 reported he was short of breath. Vital signs were documented as a blood pressure of 127/65 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), a temperature 99.0 degrees Fahrenheit (F), respirations of 16 breaths per minutes, and an oxygen saturation of 74 percent (%). Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents and related documents, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected two (#11 and #64) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 08/14/25. Diagnoses include asthma, epilepsy, anemia, bladder dysfunction, psychoactive substance abuse, borderline personality, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact with mild depression and no behaviors. Resident #64 required supervision with ambulating. Review of Resident #64 care plan dated 01/22/26 revealed a plan for mood distress and anxiety related to a history of depressive illness. Interventions include to speaking about feeling and emotions and to attempt alternative therapies such as music. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a self-reported incident, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was timely reported to the state survey agency. This affected one (Resident #11) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Record review for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/28/20. Diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder, acquired absence of the left foot, weakness, and anxiety disorder.Record review for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 03/19/20 and a discharge date of 12/08/25. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder.Review of the progress note for Resident #11 dated 11/27/25 at 1:30 P.M., completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #622 revealed the nurse made aware that the resident alleged he and a peer had an altercation with a skin alteration noted. The residents were separated, the skin alteration was cleansed, and the physician was notified.Record review of a self-reported incident (SRI) for an allegation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days of completion, as required. This affected one (#84) three residents reviewed for MDS assessment submissions. The facility census was 91.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and vitamin D deficiency.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment schedule for Resident #84 on 03/31/26 revealed a quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 10/10/25, and a subsequent quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 01/10/26. Further review revealed the 01/10/26 assessment was listed as exported, indicating it had not been successfully transmitted and accepted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required 14-day timeframe following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one (#44) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) was properly assessed and provided services to address a decline in ADLs self-care. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Record review for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 09/30/22. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side, osteonecrosis of the right femur, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, retention of urine, vertigo, and personal history of a traumatic brain injury. Review of the facility census revealed Resident #44 was transferred from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/29/24. Resident #44 was transferred from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/16/25.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of shower schedules, the facility failed to ensure adequate fingernail care was completed for dependent residents. This affected one (#89) of four residents reviewed for bathing/showers. The facility census was 91.Findings include: Record review for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 06/06/18. Diagnoses included spastic diplegic, cerebral palsy, polyneuropathy, spina bifida, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact. Resident #89 had impairment on both sides of the upper and lower extremities. Resident #89 used a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent for showers/bathing, personal hygiene, and chair/bed to chair transfers. Review of the care plan dated 12/22/25 revealed Resident #89 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to a decline in functional mobility. Interventions included for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#20) resident received assistance with his glasses to ensure consistency with utilizing the prescribed glasses. This affected one (#20) of three residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 91.Findings include: Record review for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 07/24/19. Diagnoses included dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unsteadiness on feet.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #20 used a wheelchair for mobility, required supervision or touch assistance to ambulate 150 wheelchair mobility, had clear speech, was usually understood and understands others, had adequate vision and did not wear corrective lenses for vision.Record review on 03/31/26 at 10:00 A.M. revealed there was no care plan for Resident #20 related to corrective lenses.Review of the eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders for urostomy care were obtained and completed. This affected one (#25) of one resident reviewed for urostomy care. The census was 91.Findings include:Record review for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 03/19/26. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, borderline personality, post-traumatic stress disorder, heart failure, and suicidal ideation. Review of the baseline admission assessment and baseline care plan dated 03/19/26 revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact and used a device for ambulation. Resident #25 had a urostomy (an artificial opening which allows urine to urine to leave the body through a stoma (opening) in the abdomen) was in normal limits. The assessment did not identify a care plan and or interventions for the urostomy. Review of Resident #25's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/19/26 with a start date of 04/01/26 to change the urostomy bag every three days and as needed. There was an order dated 04/01/26 with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a dialysis agreement, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessments of a resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments were consistently completed. This affected one (#6) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 02/18/26. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anemia in chronic kidney disease, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had intact cognition, required supervision or touch assistance with eating, and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. The assessment also indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained proper infection control practice when providing care for residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected two (#5 and #33) of eight residents observed for EBP. The facility census was 91.Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/31/24. Diagnoses included obstructive and reflux uropathy, retention of urine, and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter and was dependent for personal hygiene.Review of the care plan dated 09/08/25 revealed Resident #5 required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) related to the suprapubic catheter. Interventions included the use of appropriate EBP when performing resident care tasks including dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean sanitary environment for Resident's #12, #13, #32, #33, #37, #44, #53, #56, #70, #74, #84, #89 and #92 who resided on the third floor nursing unit and failed to ensure phone calls to the facility were answered timely. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/19/23 and diagnoses included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, schizophrenia and unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #44's care plan dated 04/18/25 included Resident #44 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to diagnoses. Resident #44 would maintain current level of function through the review date of 10/27/25. Interventions included Resident #44 was independent for toileting and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility Activity Calendar and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities as scheduled and failed to ensure Resident's #11, #33, #47 #67, and #82's care planned interventions were implemented for activities and activities were offered per their preferences. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/05/25 and a readmission date of 06/19/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the left dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #67 resided on the second floor nursing unit. Review of Resident #67's electronic record from 06/01/25 through 06/26/25 did not reveal evidence Resident #67 had one-to-one activity participation or self-directed activity participation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident's #19 and #43 received appropriate incontinence care timely. This affected two residents (Resident's #19 and #43) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/12 and a readmission date of 01/06/15. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, Parkinson's Disease and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #43's care plan revised 10/07/24 revealed Resident #43 had bladder and bowel incontinence and was at risk for skin breakdown and urinary tract infections. Resident #43 would remain free from skin breakdown due to incontinence and brief use through the review date. Interventions included staff would provide assistance with toileting and incontinence care as needed. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's physician orders and care planned interventions for enhanced barrier precautions were followed. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of two residents observed for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/09 and diagnoses included unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #19's physician orders revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to feeding tube, every shift. Review of Resident #19's care plan revised 10/15/24 revealed Resident #19 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to feeding tube. To reduce the potential of spreading multi-drug resistant organisms daily. Interventions included use of appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions when performing the following including personal hygiene, toileting and peri care. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to report an incident of potential neglect involving Resident #93 to the State Agency as required. This affected one resident (#93) of nine residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #93's closed medical record revealed an original admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, dementia, anxiety, antisocial personality disorder, hallucinations and body dysmorphic order, and right leg above the knee amputation. Resident #93 had elected to be a full code (requiring full resuscitation efforts including cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest). Resident #93 was transported to a local hospital where he was pronounced deceased on [DATE]. Review of Resident #93's care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a self-care performance deficit for activities of daily living related to diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), policy review, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident physical abuse. This affected five (#2, #20, #21, #22, and #23) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census as 98. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and dysphagia. Review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistant for completing his activities of daily living (ADLs). 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview and review of Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at an appropriate temperature and were palatable. This had the potential to affect all residents, except Resident #50 was what identified by the facility as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observation on 11/12/24 at 12:35 P.M. of the lunch meal service with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #241 revealed a lunch tray that contained of a plate of a red watery substance, a mixture of meat and beans and a bag of chips. LPN #241 stated she was unsure what the meal was and stated this is the slop they are often served. Further observation revealed a container of ice cream on the tray. LPN #241 removed the lid from the ice cream and revealed the ice cream was melted. LPN #241 verified the ice cream was melted and stated the residents often complained about the food and the small portions they received. Concurrent interview with Resident #71 and Resident #73 revealed the food was awful and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in working order and able to be reached by residents. This affected 14 residents (#41, #42, #43, #44, #63, #64, #80, #81, #83, #84, #89, #90, #91 and #92) of 14 residents observed for call lights. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Interview on 11/12/24 at 11:46 A.M. with Activities Aide (AA) #236 revealed she had observed short call light cords in some resident rooms. AA #236 stated she was unsure why the call light cords were shorter than others. Observation with AA #236 revealed call light cords, approximately two to three inches in length, were in Resident #89, Resident #90, Resident #91 and Resident #92's rooms. AA #236 verified the call light cords were not long enough to reach the residents if they were in bed. Continued observations with AA #236 revealed call lights were not functioning in Resident #80, Resident #81, Resident #83, Resident #84, Resident #89, Resident #90, Resident #91 and Resident #92's rooms and there was no evidence an alternative call light system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected two residents (#39 and #46) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Interview on 11/12/24 at 8:59 A.M. with Resident #39 revealed there was water coming into his room from the ceiling and wall. The resident stated the leak had been going on for a few weeks. Resident #39 stated he he informed the Administrator and maintenance of the situation; however, it had not been fixed. Resident #39 stated staff placed towels and sheets down to soak up the water. Concurrent observation revealed a large puddle of water, with multiple sheets placed on the floor near the baseboard, in Resident #39's room. Additionally, Resident #39's sheets were odorous and had several brown and black stains. Resident #39 stated he could not recall the last time the sheets were changed. During the observation of Resident #39's room, Housekeeper (HSK) #321 entered and stated she had seen the water in the room for several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was free from resident-to-resident physical abuse by Resident #59. This affected one resident (#8) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date is 10/06/23. Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia, muscle weakness, liver cancer, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was cognitively intact. He required supervision for showering and personal hygiene and setup help for eating, oral hygiene, and toileting. He displayed no behaviors. Review of the progress note dated 02/18/24 at 3:21 P.M. revealed Resident #8 obtained several scratches on his face as the result of an altercation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #103 received an orderly discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #103) out of three residents reviewed for discharge. Findings include: Review of Resident #103's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/23/21 and diagnoses included quadriplegia, C5 through C7 incomplete, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and neurogenic bowel. Review of Resident #103's care plan revised 11/02/22 included Resident #103 had an ADL (Activity of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to limited mobility due to quadriplegia, scoliosis and other diagnoses. Interventions included Resident #103 was dependent on staff for dressing, Resident #103 preferred to wear shoes and to make sure shoes were comfortable and not slippery. Review of Resident #103's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #103 was cognitively intact. Resident #103 was dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to fix a broken basement door lock to maintain safe environment. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the double basement doors on 01/24/24 at 10:30 A.M. revealed the doors were situated at ground level near the loading dock and provided access to the dumpsters. Both doors were unlocked. The open doors had potential to grant outsiders access into the facility with access to an elevator that led to residential floors specifically the second and fourth floors without a necessary security code. Interview on 01/24/24 at 10:46 A.M. with the Administrator who verified the basement door was not locked, and a code was not needed to use the basement elevator to reach residential floors. The Administrator stated the door had been open with outside access since March 2023. The Administrator further revealed that in the last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated and failed to ensure safe smoking practices. This affected five residents (#43, #48, #58, #60, and #80) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 11/03/16. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, unspecified convulsions, and cataracts. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was rarely or never understood. He required substantial or maximum assistance for toileting, hygiene, and lower body dressing, partial assistance for upper body dressing, and supervision for eating. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was at high risk for falls. Review of the care plan dated 06/24/21 revealed Resident #43 was at risk for falls due to dementia, medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow their abuse policy regarding reporting allegations of abuse timely and thoroughly investigate all allegations of abuse. This affected three residents (#20, #48 and #50) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed admission date of 01/07/22. Diagnoses Included quadriplegia, dysfunctional bladder, depression, history of falling, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact. She displayed no behaviors, hallucinations, or delusions. She used her walker to ambulate and required setup help for eating and oral hygiene. She required substantial or maximum assistance for upper body dressing and was dependent for toileting, showering or bathing, lower body dressing, and hygiene. Review of the facility SRI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident review, and facility policy review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#20 and #50) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed admission date of 01/07/22. Diagnoses Included quadriplegia, dysfunctional bladder, depression, history of falling, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact. She displayed no behaviors, hallucinations, or delusions. She used her walker to ambulate and required setup help for eating and oral hygiene. She required substantial or maximum assistance for upper body dressing and was dependent for toileting, showering or bathing, lower body dressing, and hygiene. Review of the facility SRI tracking number 242461 dated 12/26/23 and timed 2:00 P.M. revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected three residents (#20, #48, and #50) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed admission date of 01/07/22. Diagnoses Included quadriplegia, dysfunctional bladder, depression, history of falling, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact. She displayed no behaviors, hallucinations, or delusions. She used her walker to ambulate and required setup help for eating and oral hygiene. She required substantial or maximum assistance for upper body dressing and was dependent for toileting, showering or bathing, lower body dressing, and hygiene. Review of the facility SRI tracking number 242461 dated 12/26/23 and timed 2:00 P.M. revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated annually and as needed. This affected one resident (#43) of ten residents reviewed for accurate care plans. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 11/03/16. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, unspecified convulsions, and cataracts. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was rarely or never understood. He required substantial or maximum assistance for toileting, hygiene, and lower body dressing, partial assistance for upper body dressing, and supervision for eating. Review of the physician's orders for January 2023 revealed orders for Depakote sprinkles 125 milligrams (mg) by mouth (PO) two times per day (BID) for seizures beginning on 08/12/21, Melatonin tablet 6 mg PO at bedtime (HS) beginning 12/05/21, Medroxyprogesterone 10 mg PO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the physician of a radiology report for Resident #48 in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#48) of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 08/05/23. Diagnoses included epilepsy, asthma, repeated falls, anemia, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was rarely or never understood. She had no behaviors, hallucinations, or delusions and used a walker and wheelchair to ambulate. She required setup help for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, upper and lower body dressing, was dependent for showering and bathing, and required maximum assistance for hygiene. She had one fall with no injury and one with a major injury since the prior assessment. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This affected two residents (#48 and #63) of ten residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 08/05/23. Diagnoses included epilepsy, asthma, repeated falls, anemia, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was rarely or never understood. She had no behaviors, hallucinations, or delusion and used a walker and wheelchair to ambulate. She required setup help for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, upper and lower body dressing, was dependent for showering and bathing, and required maximum assistance for hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 11/27/23 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for falls due to history of falling, seizures, and medication noncompliance. Interventions included a head-to-toe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, review of job descriptions and interview the facility failed to ensure only qualified and competent licensed nursing staff completed resident skin assessments and failed to ensure all licensed nursing staff demonstrated the competency necessary to provide adequate and necessary skin and wound care. This affected seven residents (#9, #25, #31, #65, #37, #90 and #107) and had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Wound Care Nurse Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 revealed a hire date of 03/31/22. The LPN had also been noted to be responsible for wound care in the facility since hire (03/31/22). Review of the LPN's personnel file revealed no evidence of any type of additional training specific to wound care/wound management. Interview on 08/08/23 at 3:00 P.M. with the DON confirmed ADON Wound Care Nurse LPN #201 was hired in the position of ADON Wound Care Nurse. The DON verified the facility had no evidence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement action plans to improve performance and/or address concerns as part of their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility QAPI program revealed the facility had no documentation regarding any performance improvement plans initiated to addressed identified concerns. Interview on 08/07/23 at 11:20 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility had no information related to the performance improvement activity following concerns with skin assessments/wound care identified in March 2023 involving Resident #107 as part of their QAPI program. The facility provided information of counseling to two staff, LPN #208 and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Wound Care Nurse Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 from March 2023 but no evidence of any other actions or skin/wound care improvement plan at that time. Interview on 08/08/23 at 8:20 A.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for skin integrity/wound care. This affected four residents (#107, #25, #9, and #37) of 10 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #107's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 11/02/22 and a discharge date of 03/10/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, hypertensive heart with chronic kidney disease with heart failure, muscle weakness, localized edema, age related cataract bilateral, and detachment of retina left eye. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/18/23 revealed Resident #107 was at risk for pressure ulcers but did not have any skin wounds. Review of the care plan for Resident #107 revealed no care plan was found in the medical record addressing Resident #107's risk for skin breakdown related to diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of the progress notes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure Resident #48 received an annual dental exam. This affected one of three residents reviewed for dental. The facility census was 96. Finding Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 07/27/21. Diagnoses included dementia and partial traumatic amputation of right forearm. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/16/22, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order for dental consult as needed on 07/28/21. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 had not had a dental exam. Interview on 10/31/22 at 12:30 P.M. with Resident #48's sister revealed the resident had not seen the dentist in quite a while and his teeth were a mess. Interview on 11/02/22 at 3:02 P.M. with the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #48 did not receive any dental services and there had not been any refusals to see the dentist.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #9's bathroom ceiling was in good repair. This affected one (Resident #9) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Interview on 10/31/22 at 10:09 A.M. with Resident # 9 revealed the ceiling in Resident #9's bathroom had been leaking for a couple of weeks. The staff put a sign on her bathroom door to alert others of the leaking ceiling and to not use the bathroom. Observation on 10/31/22 at 10:12 A.M. of Resident #9's bathroom revealed water leaking from small holes in the ceiling tiles. The holes looked uniform in shape, as if made with a drill. Interview and observation on 10/31/22 at 1:05 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #529 stated he was not aware Resident #9's bathroom ceiling had water leaking and he had been working at the facility for three months. MD #529 verified the sign on the bathroom door to not use the bathroom and verified the water leaking from the bathroom ceiling. MD #529 stated the leak was due to a leaky toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free from infestation of gnats. This affected two (Resident #9 and #50) of five Residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: 1. Interview on 10/31/22 at 10:09 A.M. with Resident #9 revealed her room had an infestation of gnats Resident #9 attributed to the leaking ceiling in her bathroom. Resident #9 stated staff knew about the bathroom ceiling and the gnats in her room. Observation on 10/31/22 at 10:10 A.M. of Resident #9's room revealed gnats flying in her room and in bathroom. 2. Interview on 10/31/22 at 10:32 A.M. with Resident #50 stated he had been having problems with gnats in his room for months and the gnats were coming out of the sink in his room. Resident #50 stated he told staff he had gnats in his room. Observation on 10/31/22 at 10:33 A.M. of Resident #50's room revealed gnats flying in his room, gnats on the mirror, walls and in sink there was a collection of several gnats around the sink drain. There were also some gnats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored in the kitchen and in the nursing unit refrigerators to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. The facility also failed to maintain the nursing unit refrigeration in a sanitary condition to prevent contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who received meal trays with the exception of Resident #13 and #123 who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. On 12/15/19 from 8:41 A.M. to 8:59 A.M. a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Staff (DS) #370 revealed in the walk-in cooler on the middle shelf was a medium sized steam table pan of chicken without a label or date. Next to it was a small steam table container of what appeared to be gravy without a label and date, and on the bottom shelf of same rack a large white tub of what appeared to be soup, whitish in color also without a label or date. Observation of bread rack revealed an opened bag of hotdog buns that had a hole created in the top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to implement a surveillance plan to identify, track, monitor and/or report infections, failed to initiate contact isolation procedures timely for Resident #105, failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) #404 applied gloves prior to a treatment to Resident #132's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line and failed to implement linen/laundry precautions to prevent the spread of infection. This affected two residents (#105 and #132) and had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe chronic kidney disease, spastic hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side. He was admitted to Hospice services on 06/24/19. Review of the nurse's progress note dated 12/07/19 at 11:17 P.M. indicated Resident #105 had a scab with a puss filled bump on his nose and swelling was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents related to smoking safety. This affected five residents (#40, #69, #71, #110 and #122) of six residents reviewed for accidents of 43 residents identified as smokers who resided on the two of four unsecured floors of the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes with neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nicotine dependence, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder recurrent and acquired absence of left leg below knee. Review of the plan of care dated 05/15/19 for Resident #40 included the potential for injury due to smoking habit. The goal included to provide Resident #40 and family information/education regarding the facility smoking policy. Interventions included Resident #40 will have supervision while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility insulin storage instructions revealed the facility failed to ensure insulin storage guidelines were followed. This affected five residents (#40, #82, #89, #102 and #112) of 17 residents receiving insulin on 100 and 400 halls. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Observation on 12/16/19 at 9:50 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 413 of insulin stored in the fourth floor medication cart and in refrigerator revealed Resident #82 had a Humulin (Intermediate acting insulin) vial with an open date of 10/22/19, Resident #89 had a Lantus (long acting insulin) vial with an open date of 11/07/19, Resident #112 had Humalog (rapid acting insulin) vial with an open date of 11/07/19 and a Basaglar (long acting insulin) KwikPen with an open date of 10/22/19. Interview on 12/16/19 at 10:10 A.M. with LPN #413 verified the Basaglar, Lantus and Humalog had an expiration date of 28 days after being opened and the Humulin had an expiration date of 42 days after being opened. LPN #413 verified the above insulin vials/pen were past their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide Resident #49 double entrée as ordered. The facility failed to use the correct scoop sizes for the pureed diet during observation of the tray line for residents. The facility also failed to serve the appropriate meal for the residents who had orders for renal diets also during observation of the tray line. This affected one resident (#49) of four residents (#44, #49, #69, and #110) reviewed for double portions, three residents (#106, #129, and #133) of three residents who received a pureed diet and five residents (#41, #43, #85, #100, and #112) of five who received a renal diet. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and history of cachexia (weakness and wasting of the body due to severe chronic illness). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/14/19 revealed Resident #49 had intact cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for all residents. This affected five residents (#62, #86, #90, #99 and #126) of 126 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: Observation on 12/15/19 at 10:53 A.M. of Resident #90's floor mat next to bed revealed it was dirty and covered with multiple stains. Interview on 12/15/19 at 10:56 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #345 verified the stain on the mat and stated it was housekeeping staff responsibility to clean. Interview on 12/15/19 at 11:10 A.M. with Housekeeper #371 revealed she will sweep the room but was not sure who was responsible for scrubbing the mats on the floor. Review of the facility undated policy titled Housekeeping revealed resident room furnishings were to be clean and free of odors and stains. An environmental tour conducted on 12/18/19 at 1:48 P.M. with Maintenance Director #336 revealed the following concerns which were verified at the time of the observation: a. Observation of Resident #62's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience for Resident #129 as State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #409 was observed standing to provide feeding assistance to the resident. This affected one resident (#129) of six residents the facility identified as requiring feeding assistance on the fourth floor. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and muscle weakness. Record review revealed Resident #129 had a care plan initiated on 08/14/18 for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit related to hemiplegia. Interventions included Resident #129 required extensive to total staff participation to eat. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #129 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for eating. On 12/15/19 at 12:21 P.M. observation of the lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to timely notify Resident #82 and Resident #120's physician of significant weight loss. This affected two residents (#82 and #120) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including disease of the pancreas, malignant neoplasm of the pancreatic duct and dysphagia. Review of Resident #82's care plan initiated on 08/07/19 revealed Resident #82 was on a therapeutic diet with risk for weight loss and nutritional risk related to altered nutritional needs, body composition and nutritionally relevant diagnoses of edema, cancer, diabetes type II, and pancreas disease. Interventions included the dietitian to evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/06/19 revealed Resident #82 had intact cognition, required supervision of one staff for eating and received a therapeutic diet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to revise Resident #13's plan of care related to nutrition/hydration following orders for the resident to receive nothing by mouth. This affected one resident (#13) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/03/19 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of oropharynx and larynx and dementia. Review of the current plan of care, dated 10/22/19 revealed the resident had altered nutritional status due to malignant neoplasm of oropharynx/larynx. Interventions included flushes via enteral feeding only, monitor by mouth intake, provide extra gravy on meats/entrée to aid in safe swallowing, prescribed diet is regular with extra gravy, provide dietary supplements as ordered (boost). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/02/19 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required supervision for eating. The assessment indicated the resident had a percutaneous endoscopic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to timely initiate nutritional interventions following Resident #82 and #120's significant weight loss and Resident #90's nutrition recommendations from dialysis. This affected three residents (#82, #90, and #120) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including disease of the pancreas, malignant neoplasm of the pancreatic duct and dysphagia. Review of Resident #82's care plan initiated on 08/07/19 revealed Resident #82 was on a therapeutic diet with risk for weight loss and nutritional risk related to altered nutritional needs, body composition and nutritionally relevant diagnoses of edema, cancer, diabetes type II, and pancreas disease. Interventions included the dietitian to evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/06/19 revealed Resident #82 had intact cognition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to assess, educate and monitor Resident #13 while independently administering enteral (tube) feed and other fluids. This affected one resident (#13) of three residents who received enteral feeding. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/03/19 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of oropharynx and larynx and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/02/19 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required supervision for eating. The assessment indicated the resident had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg tube or feeding tube). Review of the nutrition note dated 11/08/19 revealed the resident had new orders for nothing by mouth (NPO). The enteral feeding order recommendations were Isosource (nutritional supplement) 1.5 calories (kcal) continuous feed via peg tube at 45 milliliter per hour (ml/hr.), which provided 1620 kcal a day. Current weight 150.5 pounds (lbs.). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to develop and implement a facility assessment that addressed all necessary components. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in creating the assessment, there was no evidence the facility solicited input from residents or their representatives. The assessment did not address staffing needs for each shift including nights and weekends or contingency planning for events that do not require activation of the facility's emergency plan.Interview on 04/06/26 at 9:54 A.M. with the Administrator and Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #631 confirmed the facility assessment did not address input from residents and representatives, nights and weekend staffing needs, and contingency planning.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-12-18 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #44 was provided the facility bed hold policy at the time he was transferred to the hospital for a pre-planned surgery. This affected one resident (#44) and had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including injury to cervical spinal cord, paraplegia and colostomy (a surgical procedure that brings one end of the large intestine out through the abdominal wall). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/19/19 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Review of Resident's #44's progress notes revealed on 03/06/19 at 6:30 A.M. the resident was transported to the hospital for a pre-planned surgery. There was no evidence in the medical record the resident was provided the facility bed hold policy at the time of his transfer.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$124,639 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-09-17
  • $18,096 — penalty dated 2025-02-13
  • $17,020 — penalty dated 2024-11-19
  • $62,838 — penalty dated 2023-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AJ R&R HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2018
EXTENDED OHIO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 04/01/2018
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2018
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 91%Medicare 0%Other / private 9%

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$260per resident / day
operating cost
$7,895per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365879. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next