Harmony Village of Warren
11525 East Ten Mile Road, Warren, MI 48089 · For profit - Corporation · 178 certified beds · (586) 759-0700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $103,274 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-08)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.2% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.4% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.4% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.5% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 1.84 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 62% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.8%CMS range 29.1–54.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.7–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.6–13.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 117.9 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient practice number one. This citation pertains to Intake MI00059836. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident from physical abuse from staff (R800) out of three reviewed for abuse, this deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and the likelihood for serious physical and /or psychosocial harm, injury, impairment, or death. Findings include: R800 A review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) noted the following, On April 3, 2025, Abuse coordinator made aware of an abuse allegation by DON [Director of Nursing] .around 10AM. [DON] stated, while rounding the A-wing unit, [R800] stated [they] was slapped by [their] midnight nurse. [R800] BIM [Brief Interview for Mental Status] score of 15, who also locomotes freely within the facility with a wheelchair. Around ten am, [R800] reported to the DON that a midnight nurse slapped [their] arm during care. The employee was immediately suspended,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00139923, MI00139924, MI00138212. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and prevent an elopement for one resident (R905) who has a legal guardian, and is incapable of making safe decisions. R905 eloped from the facility which is located on a busy four lane intersection on 7/25/2023 between 12:00pm and12:30pm without the facility staff being aware of the resident's whereabouts for approximately one hour. R905 was allowed to exit the facility by a visitor between 12:00-12:30pm on 7/25/23. R905 exited through the front door which requires a code to enter/exit. R905 walked toward their home of origin, which is approximately 2 miles away, and admitted ly got into the car of an unknown male who drove them the remainder of the way. R905 attempted to enter their old home, and the local police department was contacted by the owner. The local police notified the facility to inform them that they had the resident in their custody at approximately 1:28pm. R905 was returned to the facility at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has three deficient practices. Deficient Practice Statement number 1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and recognize skin alterations for one resident (R28) of four reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the development of untreated wounds, acute osteomyelitis, and toe amputation. Findings include: A review of R28's medical record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE]. Further review revealed that R28's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 13/15, indicating an intact cognition, and that the resident's medical diagnoses include Heart Failure, Chronic Lung Disease, Muscle Weakness, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Anemia, Anxiety, Depression, Psoriasis, Hypertension, and Knee Contractures. On 12/15/22 at 10:28 AM, R28 was observed lying in bed. R28's feet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 3008257.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) for one resident (R901) of three reviewed for reporting of alleged violations. Findings include: A review of documentation submitted to the SA revealed R901 had sustained an ankle fracture of unknown origin, and the Nursing Home Administrator did not report it to the SA stating it occurred during care.A review of R901's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Dementia, Metabolic Encephalopathy, and Anemia. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required two-person assistance for transfers and bed mobility.Further review of the medical record revealed x-ray results dated 5/5/26 revealed R901 had sustained a left ankle fracture. A progress note: 5/5/2026 19:31 IDT (interdisciplinary team) Review .Resident is currently on hospice services with diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 05/05/25 between 7:15 AM-7:45 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was a large piece of cardboard on the floor underneath the rack holding the milk crates. The surface of the cardboard was covered with a spotty, black mold-like substance. In addition, there was an opened 1 gallon container of Italian dressing with a use-by date of 4/28. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-101.19 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT that are exposed to splash, spillage, or other FOOD soiling or that require frequent cleaning shall be constructed of a CORROSION-RESISTANT, nonabsorbent, and SMOOTH material. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-101.11 Surface Characteristics, (A) Except as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure water was accessible for one resident (R115) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: On 5/5/25 at 8:02 AM, R115 was observed in their room in bed with their water cup being out of reach on their dresser. R115 was interviewed and asked about the accessibility of their water cup and indicated they could not reach it and did not want to get up to get it because they didn't want to fall. On 5/7/25 at 10:27 AM, an observation was made of R115 having no water cup. R115 was observed to be in their room in bed. R115 was interviewed and asked about the location of their water and indicated that someone had come into their room and taken it. R115 was asked if they felt thirsty and stated, sometimes. On 5/7/25 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about their expectations regarding accessibility of fresh water for residents when in their rooms and indicated fresh water should be available. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF/ABN - notice informing of pay charges) for one resident (R73) of three reviewed for beneficiary notification. Findings include: An ABN list provided by the facility revealed R73 had a Medicare Part A discharge date of 2/24/25 and remained living in the facility. Review of the notices provided by the facility for R73's revealed there was no SNF/ABN notice issued to R73's resident and/or representative (RR) informing them of the potential pay charges for continued services at the facility. On 5/7/25 at 12:30 PM, Business Office Manager A (BOM) was interviewed regarding the missing SNF/ABN notice for R73 and indicated it was an oversight (R73's RR did not recieve notice) . On 5/7/25 at 1:02 PM, the Administrator was interviewed regarding their expectation for beneficiary notification and comfirmed they should be issued timely.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Change in Condition level one screening Form DCH (Department of Community Health/3877) was submitted to the local Community Mental Health Services Program (CMHSP) for a level two OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) evaluation upon a change in the resident's condition for two (R16 and R64) of two residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR). Findings include: R64 A clinical record review revealed R64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiparesis following a stroke, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 indicated an intact cognition. On 5/06/25, a review of the available PASARR form revealed a 3877 form dated 4/18/24 and it was completted as a change of condition with no noted follow up. There was no evidence of R64 being referred for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) care plan for one resident (R87) of two reviewed for care plans. Findings include: A review of R87's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Heart Failure, and Major Depressive Disorder. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required one person assistance for bathing and dressing. Further review of R87's medical record revealed two Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) evaluations (A document that records the results of the in-person evaluation used to assess a person's need for specialized services). Both evaluations were completed in 2024 and 2025 noted the resident was diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Further review of R87's medical record revealed a care plan which did not address R87's diagnosis. On 5/7/25 at 10:15 AM, Social Worker B was asked about the missing care plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, review the facility failed to update interventions on a psychiatric care plan for one resident (R95) of two residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: On 5/5/25 at 1:57 PM, an observation was made of R95 lying in their bed, awake, yelling, screaming, and swearing. A review of R95's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Mood disorder and Major Depressive disorder. R95's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R95 had a moderately impaired cognition with no mood indicators listed on the assessment. A review of R95's orders revealed that R95 was prescribed the following: Remeron (treament for depression) Oral Tablet 15 mg (milligrams) Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for mood. A review of R95's care plan revealed the following psychiatric care plan goal/intervention: Focus: I use antidepressant medication r/t (related to) Depression .Interventions/Tasks: I am followed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a gastroenterology and infectious disease consultation for one resident (R105) of one reviewed for consults. Findings include: A review of R105's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/17/23 with diagnoses that included Dysphagia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Anxiety. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and independent for transfers and bed mobility. A review of R105's medical record revealed the following progress note: Physician Progress Note: 5/30/2024 14:55 (2:55pm) Practitioner Progress Notes. Chief complaint: Hepatitis C and preventive screening .[R105] with PMH (previous medical history) of polysubstance abuse, Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), severe protein calorie malnutrition, hepatitis, alcoholism, diabetes, insomnia, sinusitis, and thyroid disease. Resident seen today to discuss chronic disease management, specifically [their] hepatitis C. [R105] has a history of polysubstance abuse and states [they were] told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a supra-pubic catheter (SP- catheter inserted via an incision through the abdomen into the bladder) urinary catheter was changed timely for one resident (R73) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. Findings include: R73 On 05/06/25 at 9:01 AM, R73 was observed to be seated in a wheelchair. The urinary catheter tubing was observed to be coiled up on the right thigh with the connection point to the drainage bag visible. The tubing appeared faded and soiled with areas of black along the length of the visible tubing. On 05/06/25 at 10:18 AM, the observation of the urinary catheter was reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E'. LPN E reported R73 had a supra-pubic catheter and they believed R73 was out regularly to the urologist and had been out to the hospital recently. A review of the record revealed the last urology appointment was on 02/05/24, in which the physician documented related to the urinary catheter .ECF(extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete monthly medication regimen reviews (MRRs) and follow up physician notification of pharmacy recommendations for four residents (R62, R68, R73 and R105) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R105 A review of R105's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/17/23 with diagnoses that included Dysphagia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Anxiety. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and independent for transfers and bed mobility. Further review of R105's medical record revealed a missing medication regimen review for July 2024. In addition, the dates of: 11/20/24, 12/27/25, and 3/15/25 noted the following, [x] See report for any noted irregularities. On 5/6/25 at 1:40 PM and 2:14 PM, and again on 5/7/25 at 8:30 AM, R105's July MRR and irregularities reports were requested from the facility however, they were not received by the end of this survey. R62 A review of the record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one delayed release medication and two extended release medications were not crushed prior to administration and a cranberry tablet dosage was correctly administered out of 33 medications observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.12%. Findings include: On 05/07/25 at 9:29 AM, a medication pass observation for R68 was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)C. The following medications were prepared, crushed and placed into applesauce: Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) tablet one time a day, Megestrol 400 mg/10ml, liquid, 10 ml (milliliters) two times a day; Zunveyl (Benzgalantamine Gluconate) Oral Tablet Delayed Release 10 mg two times a day; Loratadine 10 mg one time a day; Cranberry 400 mg tablet one time a day, (450 mg tablet given); Losartan 100 mg tablet in the morning; Metoprolol succinate 100 mg ER (extended release) tablet; Amlodipine 5 mg tablet in the morning; and Klor-con potassium ER 20 MCG (micrograms) tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00151378. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights, notify, or obtain consent from a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) regarding a resident discharge for one resident (R504) of three sampled residents reviewed, resulting in the released to an unauthorized family member. Findings include: R504 R504's Electronic Medical Record EMR was reviewed on 4/8/25 at 11:30 AM. R504 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Cervical Disc Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Carcinoma of the Prostate, in addition to other diagnoses. R504's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score dated 1/15/25, assessed by the facility, was 6/15. A BIMS score of 6 indicates severe cognitive impairment. R504 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed they are frequently incontinent with both bowel and bladder elimination patterns and requires substantial/maximal assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A review of R504's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00151133. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and prevent abuse from occurring for one resident (R504) who was inappropriately touched by another resident (R505) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of the facility investigation revealed that on 3/3/25 at 3:30 PM. The Activities Director reported witnessing R505 inappropriately touching R504 to the Social Service Director. The incident occurred in the dining room with no staff present. The Activities Director happened to step out of her office door and saw R505 touching R504's breast. The Activities Director called out R505's name. She said that the behavior was unacceptable and immediately separated both residents (R504 and R505). The Social Services Director reported the incident to the Abuse Coordinator. R504 Record review revealed F504 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, carcinoma of the prostate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00147420. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clean and repaired flooring, handrails and furniture items throughout the facility potentially affecting all 126 residents residing there. Findings include: On 11/14/24 at 10:36 AM, observations of the environment were initiated and revealed: The A wing 100 hall shower room had some dried build up of debris on the strainer for the drains in the left hand shower stalls. The toilet bowel had an amount of used tissue which filled the bowl. The six to eight foot long baseboard heater register was observed to have rust scattered across the surfaces, a portion of the cover hung down on one end and multiple tines of the register were dented or mashed. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an unoccupied bed which tilted down at one corner, the mattress did not fit the width of the bed, the bed sheet was soiled with a few tan/brown spots and the sheet rock at the wall side of the bed had a softball size dent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00146878 and MI00146890. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physican was timely provided notification off an abnormal blood sugar (glucose) for one resident (R901) of three reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: A physician order documented, sliding scale insulin order for humalog revised 01/28/24 revealed 401 to 450 give 12 units, greater than 450 call doctor for further coverage orders . The blood glucose results documented for 09/09/24 revealed: - a blood glucose of 450 documented at 9:56 AM, - a blood glucose of 550 documented at 11:57 AM and, - a blood glucose of 550 documented at 3:53 PM. All documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. Further review of the record revealed no notification to the physician for the abnormal 450 blood glucose levels at 9:56 AM and 11:57 AM. A progress note dated 9/9/24, by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A at 16:01 (4:01 PM after third high blood glucose reading): Alert Note Text: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation petains to Intakes MI00145830 and MI00146169. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a plan of care for two residents (R700 and 701) of out of two residents reviewed for quality or care care plans. Findings include: R700 On 08/13/24 at 10:00 AM, R700 was observed sitting up in electric chair listening to music on their head phones. R700 discussed concerns about care of their (indwelling tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) catheter. A review of R700's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/01/24 with diagnoses of Paraplegia; Opioid Independence; Major depressive disorder; and Anxiety disorder. A review of R700's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, R700's Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment score was a 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of R700's medical record revealed no care plan with goals or interventions for the care of the catheter. R701 On 08/13/24 at 11:30, R701 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00145065. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the facilities census of 133 residents. Findings include: On 7/03/24 at 10:20 AM, the floor tile in the basement were observed to be broken and missing in multiple areas of the basement. On 7/03/24 at 10:30 AM, the Maintenance/Housekeeping/Laundry Director was asked about the basement floor and stated, They are asbestos, corporate knows and we are to not touch it. On 7/03/24 at 11:36 AM, during another observation in the basement the Maintenance/Housekeeping/Laundry Director was asked about the asbestos tile and now stated, I'm not sure if it's asbestos. The Director was asked about the statement prior that it was asbestos and he said that because of how the tile looked and the size of them. The Director was asked if the tile problem was reported to corporate. The Director reported, They don't know, I will tell them today. On 7/03/24 at 1:27 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked about the basement floor tile being asbestos.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00145065. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for one (R803) of five residents reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: On 7/3/24 at 10:15 AM, R803 was observed lying in bed and was asked about their stay at the facility and stated, Yesterday was the first time I got a shower at this new room. I have not had the bed linen changed since getting to this room. R803's was observed with a gown on that material had been worn that cause the gown to be see through. R803 pillowcase was observed stained with a yellow ring around it. R803 reported the facility had a lack of linen. During this same time, observation of R803's bathroom revealed, the toilet was observed with water that dripped to the floor. The floor was observed with black and gray substance that appeared to be mold along the crease of the wall. The bathroom vent was observed with a thick layer of a buildup of dust and debris. On 7/03/24 at 9:15 AM and 10:00 AM, the two linen closets were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a QAPI ( Quality Assurance and Process Improvement) program, resulting in the lack of the facility's ability to identify areas needing improvement and enacting a process for correction of those issues, potentially affecting all 136 residents' quality of life. Findings include: During an interview on 03/28/24 at 12:07 PM with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), a request was made to review the facility's QAPI Program Plan for the past 6 months. The NHA stated, I have not been able to locate QAPI notes nor information since the last QAPI meeting on 9/25/23. I have only been administrator for two weeks at this facility. Review of the policy titled QAPI Data Colllection Systems revise date 3/24 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to systematically collect data as part of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure the care and services it delivers meet acceptable standards of quality in accordance with recognized standards of practice.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Program that identified, developed, and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct quality deficiencies, which has the potential to affect all 136 residents in the facility. On 3/28/24 at 12:07 PM a meeting was held with the Nursing Home Administrator. When asked about identified plans, concerns or brought to QAPI. The NHA revealed that he was a recent hire two weeks ago and the last QAPI meeting was 9/25/23. When asked about his expectation for QAPI, NHA stated, My expectation are that a full QAPI meeting should be held at least quarterly and monthly monitoring of care concerns and system deficiencies. Review of the policy titled QAPI Data Colllection Systems revise date 3/24 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to systematically collect data as part of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure the care and services it delivers meet acceptable standards of quality in accordance with recognized standards of practice.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee met at least quarterly with the required committee members. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for ineffective coordination of facility issues and concerns affecting all 136 residents i the facility. On 3/28/24 at 12:07 PM a meeting was held with the Nursing Home Administrator. When asked about the the meeting minutes and sign in sheets for the QAPI meeting. The NHA stated,The last QAPI meeting was 9/25/23. I have not been able to find any sign sheets or minutes since then. When asked about the expectation for the QAPI committe, NHA stated, My expectation are that a full QAPI meeting should be held at least quarterly and monthly monitoring of care concerns and system deficiencies. Review of the policy titled QAPI Data Colllection Systems with the revision date of 3/24 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to systematically collect data as part of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and Record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize an Antibiotic Stewardship Program and failed to ensure accurate monitoring and documentation of antibiotic use resulting in the potential for inappropriate antibiotic utilization and worsening or non-improving infections for all 134 facility residents. Findings Include: On 3/28/2024 at 12:00PM, the Infection Control task was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that they were acting as the Infection Control (IC) nurse at the time. The DON was asked to provide the antibiotic monitoring and line listing starting from January, February and March 2024. The DON stated that they had not been monitoring antibiotic use for the 2024 year. The DON was asked how the facility is ensuring that antibiotics are being prescribed correctly and there are no adverse effects. The DON stated that it is being managed by the physicians at this time, but the antibiotic stewardship program was not being utilized at the time. A review of a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP-individual who is responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring, and managing the Infection Prevention and Control Program) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings Include: On 3/28/2024 at 12:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that they were also acting as the IP in the facility. The DON stated they had been in the role for a couple months due to some company changes. The DON stated they had started the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) course for infection control, however had not completed it yet. The DON stated they did not have a corporate IP and they had no other training related to IP. A review of a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program noted the following, .a. All staff shall receive training, relevant to their specific roles and responsibilities, regarding the facility's infection prevention and control program, including policies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00143093. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that towels and wash clothes were available for seven confidential group residents of seven residents reviewed for homelike environment, resulting in resident dissatisfaction. Findings include: On 3/27/24 at 10:00 AM, a confidential group meeting was held with seven confidential group residents and the group was asked about their overall level of satisfaction with the care and services at the facility. All seven group members expressed dissatisfaction with the amount of towels and wash clothes they were provided. The group indicated that the facility runs out of towels and wash clothes on the units approximately, Two times a week. On 3/28/24 at 1:28 PM, An observation of the 100 unit linen closet revealed no towels or wash clothes observed in the closet. On 3/28/24 at 1:30 PM, An observation of the 200 unit linen closet revealed no towels or wash clothes observed in the closet. On 3/28/24 at 1:32 PM, an interview was conducted with 200 unit Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00142583 and MI00142441. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect resident funds for seven residents (R8, R15, R34, R75, R84, R92, and R108) of seven residents reviewed for misappropriation of funds. Findings include: In a complaint, as well as, a facility reported incident (FRI) reported to the State Agency indicated; An audit of the facility's trust fund accounts revealed missing funds. R84 On 03/27/24 at 8:55 AM, R84 was interviewed in their room regarding the alleged misappropriation of funds that was noted in their complaint to the State agency. R84 stated Usually I get my social security check to sign around the second or third day of the month and when it got to be about the 10th of the month (January 2024) and I hadn't seen it. I asked the Business Office Manager (BOM) M (who was covering at the time for BOM N) about my check. (BOM M) came back to me and said they had called Social Security and they were waiting to hear back. I didn't hear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to pass and date water for five residents (R7, R11, R16, R84, and R287) of five residents reviewed for hydration. Findings Include: R7 On 3/26/2024 at 2:09 PM, R7 was observed in bed. No water was observed at the bedside. R11 On 3/26/2024 at 11:40 AM, R11 was observed sitting in their room. R11 had no ice or ice water. R11 stated that they never get ice for their pop they have in the room. R11 stated that there is only one ice machine for the whole building and its runs out of ice often. R11 stated that this has been going on for about six months. R16 On 3/26/2024 at 2:02 PM, R16 was observed in the bed. R16 stated that they wanted some ice water. R16 activated their light and told their certified nursing assistant (CNA) that they wanted some water. CNA Q stated that they were waiting for a meeting to conclude in the dining room where the ice machine was and then they could get them some ice water. CNA Q stated that there was only one working ice machine and that if often runs out of ice. R287 On 3/26/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the education regarding benefits and offering of immunizations (influenza vaccine) for four residents (R287, R91, R84 and R5) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings Include: R287 Review of the medical record revealed that R287 admitted into the facility on [DATE]. During the Infection Control task, the consent or declination related to the influenza vaccine was requested. The facility staff provided a declination dated for 9/22/2022. No further information was provided related to the current influenza season. R91 Review of the medical record revealed that 91 admitted into the facility on [DATE]. During the Infection Control task, the consent or declination related to the influenza vaccine was requested. Provided was a consent dated 9/21/2022. No further information was provided related to the current influenza season. R84 Review of the medical record revealed that R84 admitted into the facility on 5/13/2020. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer or document the COVID-19 vaccination to three residents (R287, R91, and R84) out of five reviewed for immunizations and one employee (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN E) of five employees reviewed for COVID vaccines. Findings include: R287 Review of the medical record revealed that R287 admitted into the facility on [DATE]. During the Infection Control task, the consent or declination related to the COVID-19 vaccine was requested. Provided was a form with the following question, .3. Do you want to receive the COVID-19 Vaccine or Booster (Available per CDC (Center for Disease Control) Guidelines)? Yes or No The area was blank with no response recorded. No further information was provided related to the Covid-19 vaccine. R91 Review of the medical record revealed that 91 admitted into the facility on [DATE]. During the Infection Control task, the consent or declination related to the COVID-19 vaccine was requested. Provided was a form with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain catheter bag privacy for one (R103) of six residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R103 revealed an admission date of 12/11/21 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Pulmonary Edema/Hypertension, and Kidney Failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 03/26/24 at 9:05 AM and 10:08 AM, R103's room door was open and their catheter bag was observed hanging on the side of the bed facing the doorway clearly visible from the hallway. The catheter bag was clear and was not in a privacy bag and staw colored urine was visible in the bag. On 03/26/24 at 10:39 AM, R103's catheter bag remained clearly visible from the hallway, uncovered and containing urine. An interview was attempted as R103 appeared alert and was making eye contact however they were unresponsive to verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143520. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for one resident (R287) out of two reviewed for call lights. Findings Include: On 3/26/2024 at 9:29 AM, R287 was observed laying in their bed. R287 stated that they were doing okay. R287 call light was noted to be behind them on their nightstand. R287 was asked to try and reach their call light. R287 stated that they were unable to reach their call light. R287 was asked if this happens often and R287 stated that it does. On 3/26/2024 at 10:03 AM, 10:58 AM, and 1:58 AM, R287's call light was observed on the nightstand and still out of reach. On 3/27/2024 at 8:47 AM and 9:14 AM, R287's call light was observed on the nightstand and still out of reach. A review of the medical record revealed that R287 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143093. Based on interview and record, the facility failed to report an employee to resident incident of alleged abuse for one resident (R8) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 3/26/24 at 1:08 PM, during an initial tour of the facility R8 was interviewed about their satisfaction with the care and services that they were receiving at the facility. R8 indicated that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T had twisted her arm. R8 was asked when this had occurred and R8 stated, One or two months ago. R8 was asked if they reported it to anyone at the facility saying, Yes I reported it to (previous Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). R8 stated, Thank you for looking into this. R8's electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed and revealed that R8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Multiple sclerosis (Autoimmune disease), Bipolar disorder, and Schizoaffective disorder. R8's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and protect a resident after an allegation of abuse for one resident (R8) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 3/26/24 at 1:08 PM, during a tour of the facility R8 was interviewed about their satisfaction with the care and services that they were receiving at the facility. R8 indicated that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T had twisted her arm. R8 was asked when this had occurred and R8 stated, One or two months ago. R8 was asked if they reported it to anyone at the facility saying, Yes I reported it to (previous Nursing Home Administrator -NHA). R8 stated, Thank you for looking into this. R8's electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed and revealed that R8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Multiple sclerosis (Autoimmune disease), Bipolar disorder, and Schizoaffective disorder. R8's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that R8 had an intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an update for a preadmission screening (PAS) and resident review (ARR) /Hospital Exempted Discharge for a Level II evaluation was completed for three residents (R12, R65 and R121) of four residents reviewed for PASARR, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health services. Findings include: R12 On 3/26/24 at 9:50 AM, R12 was observed sitting in room watching television. R12 appeared very anxious about not going back home and staying at facility. On 3/27/24 at 1:00 PM, R12 was observed going to dining room and speaking with other residents. A review of R12's medical record revealed the last 3877 was completed on12/20/22 and last level II 2/23/23. A review of the medical record revealed that R12 admitted into the facility on 5/02/19 with the following diagnoses of Major Depressive disorder, Psychosis, Schizophrenia and Adjustment Disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] was completed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (R103) of four residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R103 Review of the facility record for R103 revealed an admission date of 12/11/21 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Pulmonary Edema/Hypertension, and Kidney Failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 03/28/24 at 3:20 PM, during review of R103's facility record pertaining to their catheter care, it was noted that no care plan was identified that addressed R103's catheter as well as no physician order pertaining to the catheter or related care. On 03/28/24 at 3:41 PM, the facility Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed R103's electronic medical record and acknowledged that there was no care plan or physician order pertaining to R103's catheter. The DON reported the expectation is that any resident with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143520. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the fall care plan following a fall for one resident (R15) of two residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: On 3/26/2024 at 9:29 AM, R287 was observed laying in bed. R287 stated that they had a fall not too long ago and had gone to the hospital. R287 stated that they did not remember how they fell, they just remember being dizzy. A review of the medical record revealed that R287 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R287 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the Incident and Accident (I/A) report dated for 3/16/2024 noted the following, Nursing Description: Pt. (Patient) found on floor beside bed. C/O (complained of) hitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143520. This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pre-surgery orders for one resident (R287) out of one reviewed for care and services, resulting in the R287 missing their surgery. Findings include: A review of Intake Called inot the State Agency noted the following, .(R287) is scheduled to have surgery on Tuesday 3/26/2024 and the (surgery) facility has been trying to contact (nursing home) to provide instructions on when to stop medications and confirm transportation and has not been able to make contact. A review of the medical record revealed that R287 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R287 also required assistance with bed mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document Nurse Aide Registry Verification for three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's J, I, F) of three CNAs reviewed for verification of ability to provide resident assistance. Findings include: On 3/28/2024 at 1:40 PM, the survey team was provided with the personnel files of three certified nursing assistants CNAs J, I, and F. Review of the files failed to reveal Nurse Aide Registry Verifications for all three CNAs. On 3/28/2024 at 5:00 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that no other records were available at the time of the interview. When queried regarding the expectation for file documentation, the DON indicated that the file should be complete including the Nurse Aide Registry Verification. No further records were provided by the facility at the time of exit.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label and date when opened eye medication for two residents (R71 and R98) in two of four medication carts. Findings include: On 3/27/2024 at 1:30 PM, the medication cart located on the 200 Hall revealed two eye medications that were opened and not dated for R98. Two additional eye medications were opened and not labeled for another unknown resident. On 3/27/2024 at 1:40 PM, the second medication cart, located on the 200 Hall revealed two eye medications for R71 without an open date and three eye medications that expired on the following dates, 1/4/2024, 1/25/2024, and 2/4/2024. On 3/28/24 at 2:00 PM an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that expired medications should not be in the medication cart and that all medications for multi-use should have an open date and labeled with resident identification. On 3/27/24 at 10:40 AM, the facility policy for the labeling and storage of medication was requested from the facility however, it was not received by the end of survey.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date and label a tube feeding bottle for one resident (R130) out of one reviewed for tube feeding. Findings Include: On 3/26/2024 at 9:15 AM, R130 was observed in the bed. It was noted that they had their tube feeding connected and running. The tube feeding bottle and water were noted to not have a label or date. On 3/26/2024 at 9:19 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was shown the tube feeding bottle and water. LPN E was queried as to when the bottle was hung. LPN E stated that they were unable to know for sure, but it goes up on the evening shift at 6:00 PM and comes down at 1260CC. LPN E was observed dating the bottle and the water. On 3/28/2024 at 12:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON was interviewed regarding the tube feeding not being labeled and dated. The DON stated that the bottle should be labeled and that when it was not, a new bottle should have been put up. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00142424. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical record for six residents (R237, R54, R90, R107, R108, and R37) of seven records reviewed for complete medical records. Findings include: R237 Review of the March 2024 Medication Administrated Record (MAR) revealed, Nurse H on December 23, 2023, day shift, documented giving R237, 13 medications while the resident was on a Leave of Absence (LOA) from the facility. Review of the medical record progress notes for R237 dated 12/23/2023 at 2:36 AM revealed, Resident on LOA with daughter until 12/24/2023. A subsequent note dated 12/24/2023 at 8:07 PM revealed Received resident back into facility. On 3/26/2024 at 11:00 AM and again at 3:00 PM it was noted that the shower room was filled with equipment near front and door to the room. Upon reviewing the medical record, showers were not documented for seven (R237, R54, R90, R107, R108, R69, and R37) of seven residents for at least 14 days. On 3/28/2024 at 12:00 AM, the shower sheets were requested.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00142002. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a care plan following a fall for one resident (R909) of one resident reviewed for care plan interventions. Findings include: A review of R909's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 7/14/23 with diagnoses that include Dementia, Heart Disease, Depression, and Anxiety. R909 was discharged from the facility on 1/5/24. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively intact, and required one person assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R909's medical record revealed the following fall care plan, I am at an increased risk for falls r/t (related to) blindness to Left Eye/dementia. Date Initiated: 07/15/2023. Interventions: -Assist and stay with me while I am in the bathroom Date Initiated: 07/15/2023 -Be sure my call light is within reach and encourage me to use it for assistance as needed. I need prompt response to all requests for assistance. Date Initiated: 07/15/2023 -Ensure that I am wearing non-skid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00142002. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete skin observations weekly for one sampled residents (R909) of one reviewed for skin management. Findings include: A review of R909's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 7/14/23 with diagnoses that include Dementia, Heart Disease, Depression, and Anxiety. R909 was discharged from the facility on 1/5/24. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required one person assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R909's medical record revealed the following care plan: Focus: I am at risk for impaired skin integrity r/t (related to) poor safety awareness, risk for moisture d/t (due to) incontinence, dementia, violent behavior. Date Initiated: 08/29/2023 .Interventions: Inspect skin daily with care - Report any concerns to nurse. Date Initiated: 08/29/2023 .Licensed Nurse skin assessment per protocol. Date Initiated: 08/29/2023 . Further review of R909's Weekly Skin Sweeps revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00142002. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include a 14-day stop date on an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medication for one resident (R909) of one reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of Intake MI00142002 called into the State Agency revealed the following, I begin complaining on Thanksgiving Day that [R909] was being over medicated because [R909] came and slept for 12 hours straight and [R909] was in such a deep sleep we could not wake [them], [R909] did not eat dinner or engage . A review of R909's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 7/14/23 with diagnoses that include Dementia, Heart Disease, Depression, and Anxiety. R909 was discharged from the facility on 1/5/24. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required one person assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed the following physician orders: Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams, Lorazepam). Give 1 tablet by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice Statement #1 This citation pertains to Intake M100141178. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the verbal abuse by a staff member of one (R903) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R903 revealed an admission date of 12/08/21 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Emphysema and Depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R903 required supervision to moderate assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. On 01/09/24 at 11:55 AM during an interview, R903 reported that they did recall an incident involving a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) named [CNA D]. R903 reported that they have difficulty getting their medication at times and they were having a verbal altercation with CNA D about their medication during which CNA D called them a bitch. R903 admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100141170. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to door alarms in a manner timely to prevent the elopement for one (R902) out of three residents reviewed for elopement. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R902 revealed an admission date of 05/20/15 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction with Right Hemiplegia and Expressive Aphasia, Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that R902 was not functionally ambulatory and required supervision for self-propelling their wheelchair up to 50 feet with two turns. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] was scored 14/15 indicating intact cognition. On 01/09/24 at 12:55 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, who was identified as the first staff to respond to the main entrance door alarm after R902 exited the building, was interviewed via phone call. LPN A reported that they recalled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100141302. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for one (R909) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R909 revealed an admission date of 05/20/15 with current primary diagnoses that included Rhabdomyolysis, Dementia, Schizophrenia and Metabolic Encephalopathy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R909 required set up to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 10/15 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 01/09/24 at 10:55 AM, the complainant was interviewed via phone call and reiterated that R909 had recently received assessment for their dental needs due to the complainant's persistent requests but that R909 had not received any routine dental exam or service in approximately four years prior to the recent assessment. They reported that R909 complained of painful and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00134945. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from inappropriate sexual advances for one sampled resident (R901) of three reviewed for abuse, resulting in R901 experiencing inappropriate sexual touching and advances, and the potential for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings include: A review of Intake MI00134945 revealed the following, Incident Summary: Residents were sitting in dining room. Employee noted that [R902] placed hand in [R901's] pants. Employee intervened and removed [R901] from the dining room . On 9/19/23 at 2:45 PM, R901 was observed lying in bed. Attempts to interview them were to no avail as they refused to speak to surveyor. A review of R901's medical record was reviewed, and revealed that R901 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Dysphagia, and Muscle Weakness. Further review revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated for 12/13/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-21 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespreadHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure unrestricted, 24-hour visitation for all 146 residents residing in the facility resulting in residents verbalizations of not being able to visit with family, anger, and sadness. Findings include: On 12/15/2022 at 8:45 am, during the initial entry of the facility, signage was posted at the receptionist desk noting the following: May 3, 2022 Attention Families, Guardians and Responsible Parties: ALL visitations are during the times of 12:30 PM-6:00 PM. Each visitor must be out of the building by 6:45PM .There will only be TWO (2) visitors allowed per visitation time and children under [AGE] years of age are not allowed. On 12/20/2022 at 10:25 AM, the resident council was held. Resident (R)130 said, We can only have visitors during 12:30 PM and 6 PM .That makes me so mad because my people work and can't come at that time . R115 said, I'm mad too because my son is six years old and is not allowed in the building .I'm so upset. R43 said,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-21 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident right to privately and confidentially packages potentially affecting all 146 Residents who reside in the facility, resulting in resident mail and packages being opened by the facility prior to delivery to the resident, and a loss of personal privacy, anger, and independence. Findings include: On 12/15/2022 at 8:45 am, during the initial entry of the facility, signage was posted at the receptionist desk noting the following: May 3, 2022 Attention Families, Guardians and Responsible Parties: ALL visitations are during the times of 12:30 PM-6:00 PM. Each visitor must be out of the building by 6:45 PM .All packages must be inspected prior to resident receiving any items to ensure the items are allowed in the facility . On 12/20/2022 at 10:25 AM, the resident council was held. Resident (R)115 said, I'm mad because (Business Office Coordinator R) opened my social security check .(they) said I need to put it into their bank here, but I have my own bank account .they open our packages too . On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure failed to ensure food items were labeled, dated, and properly store personal items, resulting in the increased potential for foodborne illnesses. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 12/15/2022 at 9:07 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. In the food preparation area, the following seasonings and condiment were opened and undated: chopped chives, poultry seasoning, and mustard. In addition, a half loaf of bread was observed opened undated. On 12/15/2022 at 9:30 AM, At least three staff coats were observed hanging on food racks next to food in the storage room. The Director of Nutrition Services was interviewed and asked about the opened and undated seasonings and mustard they said, I will make sure they (seasonings and condiment) are dated .they do not have space in the employee lounge for their coats. A review of the facility's policy Food Storage dated 05/25/07 and revised on 01/2021 noted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of at least quarterly meetings held by the Quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee, affecting all residents residing in the facility, and resulting in the potential for unidentified quality deficiencies with a lack of response and corrective action. Findings include: On 12/21/22 at 11:00 AM, review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) task was conducted with the facility's current Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA indicated she had only been at the facility since September 2022. When asked to review the sign-in sheets for the QAA committee meetings since the last recertification survey (5/5/2021), the NHA stated, The sign-in sheets aren't together. The NHA indicated there have been QAA committee meetings since the last recertification survey, but that she was unable to establish when they were held due to lack of documentation. The facility was afforded multiple opportunities prior to exit to present proof of at least quarterly QAA committee meetings, however,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00133281 and MI00133076. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse for one sampled resident (R132), of 11 residents reviewed for abuse resulting in, the potential for emotional distress. Findings include: A review of a complaint to the State Agency revealed the following, .On 12/3/22 the writer received a report from a nurse regarding an incident involving [R132] and a CNA (certified nursing assistant). Per the report [R132] was involved in a verbal altercation with [the] CNA. During the altercation the CNA stated, 'That's why your roommate was about to beat your [expletive] . On 12/15/22 at 11:35 AM, R132 was interviewed regarding the incident related to the verbal altercation with the CNA, CNA H. R132 explained that CNA H came into their room to provide incontinence care. R132 explained that they advised CNA H that they prefer that only women provide care to them. R132 explained that a woman CNA did come to their room however, CNA H came back into the room with them. R132…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00133052. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the state agency for one resident (R4) out of two reviewed for abuse, resulting in the delayed reporting and investigation of abuse allegations. Findings Include: A review of complaint called into the State Agency noted the following, When (R4) is out [their] room too long, a staff member will grab [them] by the arm . A review of R4's progress notes revealed the following, 12/8/2022 at 8:26 PM, Behavior Note: Please describe behavior that was observed and was it distressing to the resident: Every time I give patient inhaler [they] want to struggle to get the inhaler, [R4] said that I hit [them]. I did not hit [R4]. [R4] did swing on me and missed. 12/10/2022 at 5:46 PM, Behavior Note: Please describe behavior that was observed and was it distressing to the resident: [R4] has been saying that I hit [them] across the left side of [their] forehead. [R4] said that they are going to get me fired. [R4's] previous roommate (sic) said that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II evaluation was completed for one resident (R40) out of two reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR Screening), resulting in the potential for unmet mental health and psychiatric care needs. Findings Include: A review of R40's PASARR Level I screening dated 12/29/2021 was completed and revealed that Section II, numbers 1,2,3, and 4 were checked and noted the following, Yes with the diagnosis of Mental Illness checked and included a diagnosis of Mood Disorder with mixed features. R40 was also taking antipsychotics at the time. On 12/20/2022 at 9:06 AM, a request was made to for R40's Level II Screening. A reply via email was received stating that R40 did not need a Level II Screening. On 12/20/2022 at 12:32 PM, an interview was completed with the Social Service Tech (SST) V regarding why R40 did not need a Level II screening and if their Level I screening was ever sent to Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) for an evaluation. SST V stated that they were unsure if it was ever…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to update a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR screening) for on resident (R4) out of two reviewed for PASARR screenings, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health and psychiatric care needs. Findings Include: A review of R4's PASARR Level I screening dated 9/28/2022 was completed and revealed that Section II, numbers 1 and 2 on the form were checked Yes with the diagnosis of Mental Illness checked and included a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type. R4 was also taking antipsychotics at the time. The note section of the form noted the following, Note: The person screened shall be determined to require a comprehensive Level II OBRA evaluation if any of the above items are Yes Unless a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician's assistant certifies on form DCH-3878 that the person meets at least on of the exemption criteria. Further review of the PASSAR Level I screening dated 9/28/2022 revealed a hospital exempted discharge were checked and noted the following, Yes, I certify the patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and update a care plan for one sampled resident (R132) of three residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in an inaccurate plan of care, and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 12/15/22 11:48 AM, an interview was completed with R132 regarding their splints not being worn, as they (the splints) were observed lying on a shelf above the bed. R132 explained that no one puts the splints on for them, and that their hands are feeling tight. R132 was also asked about the verbal altercation with the CNA, CNA H. R132 explained that CNA H came into their room to provide incontinence care. R132 explained that they advised CNA H that they prefer that only women provide care to them. R132 explained that a woman CNA did come to their room however, CNA H came back into the room with them. R132 explained that they asked CNA H if they were undercover a term implying that CNA H was gay (homosexual), and a verbal altercation ensued resulting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers to one resident (R134) out of two reviewed for showers, resulting in feelings of frustration and dissatisfaction with care, based on the reasonable person concept. Findings Include: A review of the medical record revealed that R134 admitted into the facility on 4/22/2022 with the following diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Muscle Weakness, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R134 also required total two-person dependence with bed mobility and transfers. A review of shower documentation for the last thirty revealed that R134 received only bed baths on the following days, 11/25/22,12/2/22,12/9/22,12/16/22, and 12/20/22. On 12/21/2022 at 1:39 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding when bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to arrange appointments for vision care for one sampled resident (R125) of one resident reviewed for vision concerns, resulting in inadequate accommodation of vision needs. Findings include: On 12/15/22 at 1:49 PM, R125 was observed in their room sitting on their bed. They were asked about their stay in the facility, and explained that they wore prescription glasses prior to their admission to the facility, and had yet to be seen by an eye doctor. A review of R125's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 2/17/22 with diagnoses that included Sarcopenia, Diabetes, and Depression. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition, and was independent for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Further review of R125's physician's orders revealed an order dated for 2/17/22 indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions per the plan of care for two residents (R74 and R75) of four reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the potential for worsening of existing pressure ulcers or the development of new wounds. Findings include: Resident #74 (R74) A review of R74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was initially admitted into the facility on 8/15/22 and re-admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of Diabetes, Hypertension, Neurogenic Bladder, Alzheimer's Disease, Seizure Disorder, Malnutrition, Gastrostomy Status, Psychotic Disorder, and Schizophrenia. Further review revealed that the resident is severely cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). On 12/15/22 at 10:25 AM, R74 was observed lying in bed on their back. A tube feeding pole was next to the bed and the resident was observed to have a urinary catheter. R74 appeared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to include the PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) diagnosis and specific interventions in the active comprehensive care plan for one sampled resident (R133) of 31 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed, resulting in the potential for re-traumatization. Findings include: On 12/15/22 at 10:02 AM, R133 was observed to be dressed and seated in the main dining room. R 133 was calm and answered yes no questions. R133 was asked about their time spent at the facility and expressed no concerns. A review of the facility record for R133 revealed R133 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included PTSD, Anxiety Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Depression and Drug Abuse. The active care plan dated 04/03/22 documented I use anti-depressant medication related to depression .I use anti-anxiety medication due to anxiety disorder . The I use anti-psychotic medications related to Behavior management due to Schizoaffective, PTSD, Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a physician responded to pharmacist monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) recommendations timely for one resident (R40) out of one reviewed for MMR's, resulting in the potential for the continuance of unnecessary medications and lack of communication of recommended medication changes. Findings Include: A review of pharmacy progress notes for the year of 2022 revealed, see report for any noted irregularities was checked for the following months, April, June, July, August. A request was made for the MRR irregularity reports for April, June, July, and August (2022). The MRR irregularity report was received for the months of April and July. No other MRR irregularity reports were received by the end of survey. On 12/20/2022 at 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding MRR's. The DON stated that they could not find the reports for June and August. No further information was provided. A review of a policy titled, Medication Monitoring noted the following, F. Resident-Specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to date insulin pens and inhalers when opened and discard expired medication in three of four medications carts reviewed resulting in the potential for decreased efficacy of medications and the use of expired medications. Findings include: On 12/16/22 at 8:25 AM, the low one hundred unit medication cart had: three Novolog insulin pens, one Humalog insulin pen, and one Basalgar insulin pen, a Serevent diskus inhaler and two glucose strips containers not dated when opened. On 12/16/22 at 12:11 PM, the middle one hundred unit medication cart had an one lantus insulin pen, not dated when opened. A review of the package insert for the Serevent Diskus revealed it should be stored inside the unopened moisture-protective foil pouch and only removed from the pouch immediately before initial use. Discard Serevent Diskus 6 weeks after opening the foil pouch or when the counter reads 0 (after all blisters have been used), whichever comes first. The inhaler is not reusable. Do not attempt to take the inhaler apart. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to arrange appointments for dental care for one sampled resident (R125) of one resident reviewed for dental concerns, resulting in inadequate accommodation of vision needs. Findings include: On 12/15/22 at 1:49 PM, R125 was observed in their room sitting on their bed. They were asked about their stay in the facility, and explained that they hadn't seen a dentist since admission to the facility, and would like to have their teeth cleaned. A review of R125's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 2/17/22 with diagnoses that included Sarcopenia, Diabetes, and Depression. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition, and was independent for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Further review of R125's physician's orders revealed an order sated for 2/17/22 indicating the following,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that four (identified as Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) W, X, Y, and Z out of five reviewed for required 12 hours of in-service training, resulting in the potential for unmet education needs, unmet resident care needs, and the potential for inadequate care. Findings Include: On 12/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, a request was made for the annual 12-hour training for CNA W, X, Y, and Z. On 12/21/2022 at 11:28 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the annual 12-hour training. The DON stated that the website they use for the training has been down for the past two weeks, so they are unable to show that the education has been completed at this time. The DON stated that they had communication out to try and get the record of the education. No further information was provided prior to the end of survey.
- No harm found · C2024-03-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week affecting all 137 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 3/28/24 at 10:21 AM, a request for daily nursing staff postings for the past 6 months were requested from the facility in an effort to verify RN coverage however, they were not provided by survey exit. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding the lack of postings, and stated, I have had four schedulers in six months, I cannot find them.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$103,274 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $83,899 — penalty dated 2025-04-08
- $15,879 — penalty dated 2024-01-10
- $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-13 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 1.9 | +3.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JM AND MAZEL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| MAZEL FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| DIPASQUA, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| FISHMAN, SHMUEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| CHM MI LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2025 |
| BRAXTON, LASHAWNDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/24/2026 |
| HOWARD, SHANNON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2025 |
| SALEH, MOHAMMAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/24/2026 |
| GITBERK LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| GITBERK TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| HARMONY VILLAGE PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| JBL 120 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| JBL 120 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| WARREN MP REALTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| ORGEL, JOSEPH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235259. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.