Continuing Healthcare At Willow Haven
1020 Taylor Street, Zanesville, OH 43701 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (740) 454-9747 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.8%CMS range 32.3–66.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.2–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 12.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.4–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 72.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's timeline and related investigation, review of staff education records, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were adequately trained and knowledgeable on the use of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) (wound vac) and were able to maintain, monitor, and intervene appropriately when complications arose. They also failed to implement a physician's order to obtain a CT scan and refer a resident to a surgeon when he showed signs of an infected abdominal wound. This affected one resident (#10) of one resident reviewed for wound vac therapy management. Harm occurred on 07/03/24 for Resident #10, who had a history of abdominal wall infections, when he displayed possible signs of infection in an abdominal wound, and the wound physician ordered a CT scan of his abdomen and a referral back to his surgeon. The facility failed to make the referrals as ordered. Resident #10 had complications related to the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented and failed to complete a comprehensive fall investigation after a fall resulting in serious injury. Actual Harm occurred on 01/15/23 when Resident #28, who was assessed to have moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of one staff member for toilet use and transfers and was identified as a fall risk, was instructed by staff (while in the bathroom with the resident) to transfer from the sink to the toilet without staff assistance and while wearing improper footwear, resulting in a fall. The resident sustained a fractured left femur (thigh bone) and possible nondisplaced fracture of the left wrist. This affected one resident (Resident #28) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 71. Findings include: Review of the Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility investigation review, interviews and Hoyer lift user instructional guide review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer when mechanical lifts were not maintained in good repair. This affected one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift use. The facility census was 62. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with the latest readmission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, obesity, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, dependence on supplemental oxygen, angina pectoris, depression, overactive bladder, constipation, pain, anemia, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and hypertension. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-performance deficit related to shortness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure storage of resident toileting equipment was maintained in a manner to prevent the potential spread of infection. This affected one resident (#40) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 62. Findings Include:On 06/09/26 at 10:12 A.M., an observation of Resident #40's bathroom revealed a peach bariatric bedpan and a gray fracture bedpan laying on the floor under the resident's sink without a protective barrier. On 06/09/26 at 11:15 A.M., an observation of Resident #40's bathroom revealed the peach bariatric bedpan and the gray fracture bedpan laying on the floor under the resident's sink without a protective barrier. On 06/09/26 at 11:35 A.M., an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #108 verified the peach bariatric bedpan and the gray fracture bedpan was not store in a manor to prevent the potential spread of infection. On 06/09/26 at 2:30 P.M., an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #172 who functions as the facility's Infection Preventionist revealed the facility had no policy on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate when the nursing staff failed to document the continency status and meal consumption percentages of residents in their electronic medical records (EMR's) on each of the three shifts daily and when they occurred. This affected seven (Resident #7, #8, #13, #24, #58, #70, and #71) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified dementia, epilepsy, hallucinations, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, constipation, anemia, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),and a history of a traumatic brain injury.Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had minimal difficulty hearing and clear speech. He was able to make himself…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was notified of a change in condition. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of eight residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 69.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #7 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, dementia, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer of left buttock, transient ischemic attack, anxiety, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of Resident #7's progress note dated 02/20/26 at 2:04 P.M. revealed Resident #7 complained of pain to the right nephrostomy tube insertion site. Area continues to be warm to touch, red in color and small amounts of drainage noted. Preliminary lab results of the nephrostomy tube site received. Med one notified of same, new orders received for doxycycline (antibiotic) 100 milligram (mg) twice a day (BID) for seven days. Resident notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were monitored and recorded for every meal, as per the plan of care. This affected three (Resident #7, #8 and #71) of three residents reviewed for nutrition/ weight loss. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified dementia, epilepsy, hallucinations, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, constipation, anemia, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),and a history of a traumatic brain injury. Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had minimal difficulty hearing and clear speech. He was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. His cognition was moderately impaired and mood indicators were present to include a poor appetite. His height was 75…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors. This affected one resident (Resident #72) of eight residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 69.Findings include: Review of Resident #72's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 02/26/18 and discharged on 12/24/25 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety, blindness of one eye, cognitive impairment and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of Resident #72's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/16/25 for lorazepam (antianxiety medication also known as Ativan) oral tablet 0.5 milligram (mg) give 0.5 tablet (the order was to give 0.5mg 1/2 tablet) by mouth every eight hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days. Target behaviors of restless, yelling out, combative.Review of Resident #72 care plan dated 09/20/23 and revised 04/10/25 revealed the resident had a behavior problem. Interventions include administration of medications as ordered. The resident uses anti-anxiety medications related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received diets per orders to meet the resident's needs. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed a re-admission date of 02/08/25 with diagnoses including epilepsy, dementia, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer to the left buttock, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). Review of Resident #07 orders revealed an order placed on 02/03/26 for large protein portions at meals, cut meats/ entrees to bite sized for wound healing.Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 03/04/26 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident was dependent for toileting, showering, transfers, and mobility. The resident also required set up/clean up assistance for eating.Review of Resident #7 at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure infection control interventions were implemented related to maintenance of a nephrostomy collection bag. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of one residents reviewed for nephrostomy maintenance. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #7 re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, dementia, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer of left buttock, transient ischemic attack, anxiety, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #7's physician orders revealed an order placed on 01/29/26 for enhanced barrier precautions every shift for prevention due to indwelling urinary catheter, nephrostomy tube, and wound (right nephrostomy insertion site with methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) (MRSA). Further review revealed the resident was ordered ceftriaxone (antibiotic) one (1) gram intramuscular (IM) every day for five days for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of purchase order history and interviews, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures in the shower rooms were at the appropriate temperature. The facility also failed to ensure a shower, sink, exhaust fan, and ceiling light were working appropriately and in good repair. This had the potential to affect 56 residents residing on Units 200, 300, 400 and 500. Facility census was 76.Findings include: Review of the printed orders from Amazon, provided by Maintenance Direct #295, revealed a shower valve was ordered to replace a bad valve for the 200-hall shower room on 11/12/25. An additional order dated 12/02/25 revealed a vacuum breaker was ordered for the 200-hall shower room. An observation on 12/30/25 at 8:57 A.M. revealed there was no water when the hot water handle in the sink in the 400-hall shower room was turned on.An interview on 12/30/25 at 8:59 A.M. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #246 verified the shower room on the 200-hall sprayed water out of the pipes and was not working properly so residents requested to be showered on the 400 or 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a self-reported incident, facility investigation review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation related to an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one resident (#78) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 76.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 08/14/25 with diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder anemia, hypothyroidism, depression, chronic respiratory failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the resident's personal inventory from admission did not include an Apple watch. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15 points, which indicated intact cognition.Review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) Tracking Number 266105 and facility investigation dated 10/07/25 revealed the category of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of facility's medication administration policy, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete regarding the administration of controlled substances. This affected two (Resident #55 and #56) of 25 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, weakness, acquired absence of left leg above knee, muscle weakness, depression, and chronic kidney disease.Review of the care plan dated 09/09/25 revealed the intervention to give analgesics as ordered by the physician and to monitor/document for side effects.Review of a physician order dated 10/31/25 revealed the order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) (opioid pain medication) one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for moderate to severe pain.Review of Resident #56's Individual Patient Controlled Substance Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff schedule review, payroll-based journal review, facility assessment review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet the needs and staffing as identified in the facility assessment. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The census was 68. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool revised 03/24/25 revealed the facility average daily census was 69 to 78 residents. The facility staffing plan was based on the resident population and their varying needs for care and services, the general approach to help the facility gauge sufficient staff to assist in meeting the needs of the residents at any given time involves various factors including: The range of facility staff that may be needed to gauge sufficient qualified staff available to meet each resident's needs may be based on resident AOL acuity, medical complexities, behavioral/psychosocial needs of the residents, and the ebb and flow of day/night routine needs to name a few. This data can be obtained from sources such as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on payroll-based journal review, staffing schedule review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide eight hours of consecutive registered nurse (RN) hours per day. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: Review of the Payroll-Based Journal second quarter 2025 revealed the facility did not meet the requirement of having a RN for eight consecutive hours daily. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool revised 03/24/25 revealed the facility average daily census was 69 to 78 residents. The facility staffing plan was based on the resident population and their varying needs for care and services, the general approach to help the facility gauge sufficient staff to assist in meeting the needs of the residents at any given time involves various factors. Review of the Staffing Schedules dated January 2025 through July 2025 revealed there was no consecutive eight hour RN coverage on the following dates: 01/18/25, 01/19/25, 02/01/25, 02/02/25, 03/16/25, 04/12/25, 04/13/25, 04/19/25, 04/20/25, 04/26/25, 05/04/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, manufacturer review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents that received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1.On 08/11/25 between 8:20 A.M. and 8:45 A.M., initial observation of the kitchen revealed Dietary Aide #111 and Dietary [NAME] #128 were preparing and serving breakfast meals. Dietary [NAME] #128 was observed serving an omelet that was dark brown and overcooked. Dietary [NAME] #128's hairnet did not encase all of her hair in the front and both sides. Dietary [NAME] #128 verified the above and she stated she was new to the position. Observation of the reach-in refrigerator revealed no temperature was displayed on the thermometer. Water was observed leaking in the same reach-in refrigerator. The reach-in refrigerator contained a gallon of whole milk, 13 glasses of chocolate milk and three additional cafeteria-style trays each containing glasses of apple juice, cranberry juice and fruit punch. The chocolate milk and juice glasses were covered with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility surety bond, review of fund balance form, and interview the facility failed to ensure the surety bond had not lapsed. This affected 42 residents (Resident #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #17, #19, #22, #23, #26, #27 (two accounts), #2 (two accounts), #28, #29, #31, #33, #34, #3, #39, #40, #5, #42, #43, #45, #47, #48, #49, #51, #52, #54, #8, #55, #10, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #65, #64, #9 (two accounts), and #67 out of 68 residents identified as having a resident funds account. Findings Include:Review of resident funds balance form dated [DATE] revealed there was 45 accounts for 42 residents (Resident #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #17, #19, #22, #23, #26, #27, (two accounts), #2 (two accounts), #28, #29, #31, #33, #34, #3, #39, #40, #5, #42, #43, #45, #47, #48, #49, #51, #52, #54, #8, #55, #10, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #65, #64, #9 (two accounts), and #67 totaling $28,884.44. Review of the surety bond dated [DATE] revealed the surety bond was effective from [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary physical environment, failed to ensure a homelike dining experience and failed to ensure adequate supplies/linens were available for resident use. This affected 16 residents observed eating in the main dining room (Resident #2, #3, #6, #8, #15, #18, #19, #20, #25, #28, #29, #31, #44, #45, #47, and #52), three resident's (#9, #69 and #80) air conditioner unit, nine resident rooms (Resident's #2, #6, #8, #18, #19, #45, #47, #65 and #80) and had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing within the facility. 1.On 08/11/25 between 11:28 A.M. and 11:35 A.M., observation and interview with Resident #59 revealed upon entering the room the floor was sticky causing your shoes to make a snapping noise as you walked across the floor. Interview with Resident #59 at the time of the observation revealed she was unaware what was on the floor that made the entire floor sticky and she said it had been that way for a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were assisted with nailcare and shaving. This affected four residents (#2, #5, #10 and #19) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 68. Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a 07/12/25 admission with diagnoses including fracture of left femur, vascular dementia, hypertensive heart disease, congested heart failure, depression, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, weakness, history of falling, anxiety disorder, Vitamin B deficiency, chronic stage III kidney disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, disorientation, hypertension, spondylolisthesis lumbar region, and cardiac murmur.Review of a 07/19/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and needed substantial/maximum assist for personal hygiene.Review of the resident record included a plan of care dated 08/05/25 activity of daily living self-care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This affected four residents (#48, #72, #77, and #80) of 27 resident records reviewed.Findings Include: 1.Closed record review revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another long-term facility. The resident admission diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of right and left female breast, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hyperlipidemia, hypocalcemia, anxiety, insomnia, essential hypertension, constipation, psoriasis, osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, pain, use of anticoagulants, and difficulty walking. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #72's altered cardiovascular status/related to hypertension, atrial fibrillation initiated [DATE] and revised [DATE] to monitor/documented/report to physician as need any signs and symptoms of coronary artery disease: chest pain or pressure especially with activity, heartburn, nausea and vomiting, shortness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) were implemented/maintained and infection control practices were maintained during incontinence care. This affected three residents (#1, #32, and #42) of four residents observed on 100-unit for EBP and two residents (#20 and #77) of two residents observed for incontinence care. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy tube. Review of Resident #32' EBP plan of care dated 07/23/25 revealed to use appropriate EPB when performing the following care: dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, hygiene care, changing linen, toileting, and peri care. Dispose of EBP in the appropriate containers. Review of Resident #32 current orders revealed no evidence of orders for EBP. Interview and observation on 08/11/25 at 10:32 A.M., of Resident #32 revealed the resident had a gastrostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, review of manufacturer guidelines and interview, the facility failed to ensure an exit door, clothes dryer, air conditioner and refrigerator were maintained. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents in the facility. The census was 68.Findings Include:1.Review of an elopement investigation dated 05/19/25 revealed the facility determined the 100 hall door was not locked as the key panel indicated.Interview on 08/21/25 at 8:51 A.M. with Maintenance Staff #173 revealed the 100 hall exit door is an Advantage 500 DE System. It was not connected to a Wanderguard system. The door at the end of the 100 hall had a key pad. The door was hardwired with a battery back up. The doors had a red and green light on the keypad. Red means locked and green open. The door was pushed to see if it opened during weekly door checks. Prior to the elopement the door was last checked on 05/15/25. Maintenance Staff #173 said the day of the elopement the door keypad was showing red. However, when the door was pushed, it opened. He said they looked and the back up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' code status' were accurate. This affected two residents (#2, #72) of 28 residents reviewed for accurate code status.Findings Include: 1. Closed record review revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another long-term care facility. The resident admission diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of right and left female breast, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hyperlipidemia, hypocalcemia, anxiety, insomnia, essential hypertension, constipation, psoriasis, osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, pain, use of anticoagulants, and difficulty walking. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #72's transfer records from the other long-term facility dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital after sustaining a fall with a fracture. Further review of the resident face sheet revealed there were no advanced directives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed including a rationale for declining gradual dose reductions. This affected one resident (#67) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 68.Findings Include:Medical record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, anxiety disorder and traumatic subdural hemorrhage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making and had an anxiety disorder. Review of the Pharmacist's Recommendation to Prescriber dated 12/09/24 revealed Resident #67 had a PRN (as needed) order for the psychotropic medication, Lorazepam (anxiolytic) 0.5 milligrams. The pharmacist stated per CMS, PRN psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. If use is beyond 14 days, the rationale and estimated duration of use must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an admission comprehensive assessment timely as required. This affected one resident (#80) of 24 residents sampled. The census was 68. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured vertebrae, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis and dysphagia. The resident was discharged from the facility on 08/18/25.Review of Resident #80's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments in the electronic medical record revealed no completed MDS assessments were available for review. Both the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] and a 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] were not completed or submitted as required within 14 days of admission. On 08/19/25 at 3:20 P.M., interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #123 verified Resident #80 did not have a MDS assessment for review due to the assessments had not been finished or submitted to CMS to date. RN #123 stated she has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a significant change of condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed timely. This affected one resident (#3) of one record reviewed for hospice. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, urinary retention, depression, and was admitted to hospice on 07/07/25. Review of Resident #3's orders dated 07/07/25 revealed the resident was admitted to hospice. Review of Resident #3's hospice plan of care dated 07/10/25 revealed the resident/responsible party had elected to utilize hospice/end-of-life care services. Review of Resident #3's MDS revealed no evidence of significant change of condition MDS was completed. Interview on 08/19/25 at 3:22 P.M., with Registered Nurse/MDS Nurse #123 confirmed Resident #3 should have had a significant change of MDS completed on 07/07/25 when the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were accurate. This affected one resident (#54) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The census was 68.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 received one dose of insulin. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated May 2025 revealed Resident #54 did not have an order for insulin. Review of the electronic Medication Administration Record dated May 2025 revealed Resident #54 did not receive insulin during the quarterly MDS assessment reference dates. On 08/18/25 at 12:28 P.M. interview with Registered Nurse #123 verified Resident #54 did not receive insulin and the MDS assessment was not accurate.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained activities of daily living including range of motion and ambulation. This affected one resident (#59) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The census was 68.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, unspecified dementia, muscle weakness and cognitive communication deficit. The resident had been receiving hospice services in 2024; however, Resident #59 was discharged from hospice on 01/01/25. Review of the OT (occupational therapy) Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed therapy recommended ADL assist as needed with no restorative or functional program indicated at that time. Review of the BCRS Scoring Worksheet dated 06/23/23 through 08/15/24 revealed Resident #59 required no assistance with ambulation. There was no therapy screens completed in 2024; however, a therapy screen was completed after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain treatment orders and comprehensively assess skin alterations. This affected two residents (#19, #77) of three residents reviewed for care and treatment.Findings Include: 1.Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed a 07/17/24 readmission with diagnoses including lymphedema, dysphasia, anemia, proximal atrial fibrillation, acquired absence of left toes, chronic kidney disease stage three, venous insufficiency, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, hyponatremia, hyperlipidemia, benign prostate hyperplasia, bladder neck obstruction, type two diabetes, severe protein calorie malnutrition, vitamin D deficiency, chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease and disorder, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder and pyoderma gangrenosum, a rare inflammatory skin disease where painful pustules or nodules become ulcers that progressively grow. The resident had a plan of care dated 03/25/24 Activity of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review, and interview the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessment of pressure ulcer skin impairments, failed to provide pressure prevention interventions, and failed to follow infection control practices during the changing of a pressure ulcer dressing. This affected one resident (#77) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 68. Findings Include:Medical record review revealed Resident #77 had multiple admissions to the facility and was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, bilateral below the knee amputations (BKA) and multiple wounds. Review of the census revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of encephalopathy and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Illustration of Documentation and Measurements of Skin Areas dated 08/08/25 revealed an open area measuring 0.5 centimeters (cm) in length (l) by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident gastrostomy tube was properly managed. This affected one resident (#32) of one resident reviewed for gastrostomy tube. The facility census was 68.Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified protein-calorie deficit, gastrostomy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, bariatric surgery status, peritoneal abscess, pain, vitamin deficiency, nausea with vomiting, hypokalemia, insomnia, muscle spasms, vitamin D deficiency, sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, type diabetes, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity, venous insufficiency, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of Resident #32's hospital discharge orders dated 07/23/25 revealed to repeat the computed tomography (CT) scan next week. The office will call with appointment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner and failed to assist with the application of a respiratory device. This affected three residents (#5, #45 and #48) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 68.Findings Include:1.Review of Resident #48 revealed a 05/18/22 admission with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), diabetes, asthma, hemiplegia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the 06/30/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment included the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision, on oxygen and a non invasive mechanical ventilator. Physician orders included an order dated 03/25/22 for non-invasive home ventilator (Trilogy machine) Settings: AVAPS-AE Breath Rate: Auto Inspiratory time: N/A Sigh: off mouthpiece ventilation: NO PS min-5 comment-20 PS max-20 comment-25 EPAP min-5 EPAP max:15 AVAPS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, dialysis contract review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center, failed to fulfill the dialysis center contract as agreed upon and failed to ensure dialysis orders were acted upon timely and administered. This affected one resident (#80) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 68. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including vertebrae fractures, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis (hemodialysis), diabetes mellitus, hypocalcemia and depression. Resident #80 was discharged back to the community on 08/18/25. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated August 2025 revealed Resident #80 was scheduled to have dialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. Review of the care plan dated 08/07/25 revealed Resident #80 needed hemodialysis related to end stage renal disease. On 08/13/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, job description review and interview, the facility failed to timely provide psychiatric services as indicated by mood symptoms. This affected one resident (#46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 68. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, bipolar disorder, depressed mild or moderate severity and anxiety disorder.Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated August 2025 revealed Resident #46 was receiving Abilify (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime, prozac (antidepressant) 30 (mg) in the morning, trazodone (antidepressant) 150 (mg) at bedtime, lamictal 100 (mg) for mood stabilization and buspirone (anxiolytic) 15 (mg) three times a day for anxiety. Review of the care plan: Potential to have Mood Problem related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive communication deficit, depression, bipolar and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure expired insulin was discarded. This affected one resident (#77) of three residents with insulin pens observed in the 200-medication cart. The facility census was 68. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a sister facility with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #77 orders dated 08/2025 revealed Humalog Kwikpen subcutaneous pen injector inject per sliding scale before meals. There was no evidence the resident was ordered Novolog. Review of Resident #77 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed Resident #77 received Humalog per sliding scale 11 times from [DATE] to [DATE]. Observation on [DATE] at 8:32 A.M., of the 200-medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #149 revealed Resident #77 had three Humalog pens. One Humalog pen was not opened and two were opened and dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor for appropriate use of opioids. This affected one resident (#67) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 68. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis cervical region, arthrodesis status, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness and muscle wasting. Review of Resident #67's care plan: Risk for Pain related to osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, GERD, chronic kidney disease, spinal stenosis, diverticulosis, previous subdural hemorrhage and atherosclerosis of aorta revised 04/11/25 revealed to administer analgesia per orders, anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately for complaints of pain. Review of the care plan did not include any individualized non-pharmacological interventions for pain management. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital discharge orders, and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was performed per orders. This affected one resident (#82) of six residents reviewed for medication review. Findings Include:Closed medical record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/30/25 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, diabetes, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, and absence of left foot. Review of Resident #82's discharge hospital notes dated 06/16/25 revealed orders for the following laboratory work: weekly complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic profile (BMP), and creatine Kinase (CK) weekly until 07/16/25. Review of Resident #82's medical record revealed no evidence a CBC, BMP, or CK was performed. Interview via email on 08/19/25 at 8:46 P.M., with Corporate Regional Nurse (CRN) #193 confirmed the resident did not have weekly labs per discharge orders. Interview on 08/20/25 at 9:00 AM with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of infection control log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents met criteria for antibiotic treatment. This affected two residents (#1 and #83) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. Findings Include: 1. Closed medical record review revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis of unspecific organism, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes, respiratory failure, heart disease, and pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #83's orders revealed on 06/01/25 the resident was ordered Cefdinir 300 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily for wound infection. On 06/03/25 the order was changed to Cefdinir 300mg by mouth twice daily for sepsis, likely respiratory until 06/05/25. Review of Resident #83's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 06/20/25 revealed Resident #82 received Cefdinir 300 mg from 06/01/25 to 06/03/25 for wound infection and from 06/03/25 to 06/05/25 for sepsis, likely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's Resident Welcome Packet, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the right to have their mail delivered to them unopened. This affected two residents (#19 and #69) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following a stroke affecting his left, non-dominant side and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. On 03/14/25 at 10:12 A.M., an interview with Resident #19 revealed he had concerns with his mail being delivered to him already opened by the facility staff. He reported the incident occurred about two to three weeks ago and he denied that he had given the facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely resolution of a concern regarding missing resident property. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, depression, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of the lip, oral cavity, and pharynx. The resident expired and was discharged on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of a Concern Report, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10's power-of-attorney (POA) filed a concern regarding Resident #10's missing rollator walker, dentures, and glasses following a hospitalization on [DATE]. The Concern Report revealed the Administrator called the inpatient psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident information was provided to the receiving facility regarding a transfer. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for death. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, depression, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of the lip, oral cavity, and pharynx. The resident expired in the facility and was discharged on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required supervision or touching assistance with ambulation, showering, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #10's Transfer Form, dated [DATE], revealed under Section E: the facility failed to include accurate resident representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review, review of a facility investigation and follow up, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure coordination of care for Resident #79 related to a gynecology appointment to timely address medical symptoms. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for appointments. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #79's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 04/30/24 and a discharge date of 11/11/24. Resident #79 had diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease stage four, chronic diastolic heart failure, and anxiety. Review of Resident #79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #79's progress note dated 10/23/24 revealed there was a new order for a referral to gynecology for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of concern reports, review of dental treatment plan quotes, email correspondence between facility staff and the corporate office, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's concern pertaining to missing upper dentures were addressed timely for a resolution. This affected one (Resident #17) of three residents reviewed for missing property. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his left non-dominant side, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and bilateral hearing loss. Review of Resident #17's profile revealed his payer status was Ohio Medicaid (MCD). The census tab in the electronic medical record revealed the resident resided on the 400 hall when he was first admitted and was moved to the 100 hall on 08/09/24. Review of Resident #17's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, maintenance log review, weather history review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and safe living environment. This affected five residents (#105, #108, #110, #111, and #114) in the facility. The census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the electronic 2024 AccuWeather History for June 2024 revealed the following air temperatures for Zanesville, Ohio between 06/17/24 and 06/22/24 during the excessive heat advisory that was issued. The below temperatures did not include humidity which had effects on the real feel temperature: On 06/17/24, 95 degrees (F). On 06/18/24, 93 degrees (F). On 06/19/24, 87 degrees (F). On 06/20/24, 92 degrees (F). On 06/21/24, 94 degrees (F). On 06/22/24, 94 degrees (F). Review of the facility Air Temperature Logbook Documentation dated 06/20/24 revealed the following temperatures: Hall 100, 74 degrees (F) Hall 200, 75 degrees (F) Hall 300, 72 degrees (F) Hall 400, 72 degrees (F) Hall 500, 75 degrees (F). The resident rooms all had individual AC units that were functioning. On 06/24/24 from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and hazard free environment. This had affected 14 residents (#101, #109, #114, #115, #117, #119, #125, #130, #138, #140, #156, #164, #166 and #171) identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independent with mobility. The census was 71. Findings include: On 06/24/24 from 8:06 A.M. to 8:20 A.M., observation revealed large portable air conditioning units were being utilized on each hallway with dual vent coils extending up to the ceiling. Fans were observed sitting on the floor in the hallways including three freestanding 22 inch metal fans, one 25 inch high velocity fan, one box fan and two standup cylinder fans. Interview with Environmental Services Director (ESD) #5 at the time of the observation revealed the facility's main air conditioning (AC) units were not working, the fans in the hallways were to keep the air circulating and residents had unrestricted access to the fan blades through the slats on the fan cover. Interview on 06/24/24 at 8:55 A.M., with Maintenance Supervisor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a homelike environment. This affected two (Residents #3 and #38) of five residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 78. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and hypertension. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) completed on 03/11/24 revealed Resident #3 maintained cognitive function. Interview on 03/25/24 at 3:20 P.M. with Resident #3 revealed her room is not cleaned regularly, the carpet is stained and dirty, and the bucket of the bedside commode was broken and would fall out when she stood up from it. Observation on 03/25/24 at 3:32 P.M. revealed the carpet in Resident #3's room was stained heavily and was scattered with debris and a large amount of clutter in the room from clothes not being hung up or placed in drawers. 2. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's resident concern log and related reports, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident grievances/ concerns were responded to timely. This affected two (Resident #10 and #38) of two residents reviewed for personal property. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #10's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included macular degeneration, encephalopathy, and alcohol dependence. A review of Resident #10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. She was not known to have displayed any behaviors and was not known to reject care during the seven days of the assessment period. On 03/25/24 at 10:47 A.M., an interview with Resident #10 revealed she has had some missing clothing in the recent past. She was not able to specify exactly what clothing items were missing. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan related to refusal of pressure ulcer interventions. This affected one (Resident #15) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 78. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, presence of right artificial hip joint, displaced fracture of posterior wall of right acetabulum, atrial fibrillation, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, post traumatic stress disorder, vitamin D deficiency, morbid obesity, insomnia, hypertension, bipolar disorder, hyperkalemia, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, anxiety disorder, dorsalgia, and osteoarthritis. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #15's physician orders found that she had a suspected deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide oral care to a resident dependent on staff for care. This affected one (Resident #43) out of four reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphasia, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with oral care. Review of functional abilities and goals assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 required supervision or touch assistance with oral hygiene. Review of the self-care task, question #2 between 03/25/24 and 03/27/24 for Resident #43 revealed oral care was provided on: - 03/25/24 at 6:59 P.M. - 03/26/24 at 3:12 A.M. and 10:17 A.M. - 03/27/24 at 1:35 A.M., 3:24 P.M. and 9:52 P.M. Observations on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bruise was timely identified and monitored as per his plan of care. This affected one (Resident #60) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include: A review of Resident #60's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, anemia, vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and abnormalities of his gait and mobility. A review of Resident #60's physician's orders revealed he was on Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every day and Apixaban (an anticoagulant) 5 mg po twice a day. A review of Resident #60's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues, but his cognition was severely impaired. He was not known to have displayed any behaviors or was known to reject care during the seven days of the assessment period. He had a functional limitation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide options for vision and hearing services to all residents, and failed to timely schedule all vision/hearing appointments as desired by the residents. This affected three (Residents #49, #35, and #66) of three residents reviewed for ancillary services. The census was 78. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were sepsis, cutaneous abscess of abdominal wall, necrotizing fasciitis, infection due to other bariatric procedure, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease (stage III), peripheral vascular disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, lymphedema, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of his minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to monitor and provide appropriate incontinence care for Resident #8's urostomy. This affected one resident (Resident #48) out of one reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to Alzheimer's, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and cancer of the urinary tract system. The resident had an urostomy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 completed on 03/12/24 revealed Resident #48 was severely cognitively impaired and required set up assistance for ADL's. Review of the Care Plan completed on 03/26/24 for Resident #48 revealed she was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to fragile skin and the ostomy or wound nurse were consulted for wound care. Resident #48 was at risk for UTI's and required staff assist with urostomy needs. Review of the care plan revealed staff are required to educate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively communicate with a dialysis provider for Resident #66. This affected one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (#66). The facility census was 78. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, end stage renal disease, and heart failure. Review of orders revealed Resident #66 attends dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of a quarterly minimum data set completed on 12/22/23 revealed Resident #66's cognition remains intact. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed there were no communications sheets from the dialysis provider from June 2023 through December 2023. There was no evidence of additional communication with the dialysis provider during this time frame. Interview on 03/27/24 at 10:26 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #158 verified no evidence of communication from dialysis from June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide pain parameters for as needed pain medications, and administered as needed pain medications without pain parameters. This affected two (Residents #22 and #49) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 78. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were unspecified fracture of shaft of left tibia and left fibula, cellulitis of right lower limb, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), panlobular emphysema, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), celiac disease, fibromyalgia, schizoaffective disorder, polyosteoarthritis, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and hyperparathyroidism. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/07/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete dental consents and/or timely schedule dental appointments for a resident. This affected one resident (Resident #35.) The census was 78. Findings include: A review of Resident #35's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy, cirrhosis of the liver, anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, COPD, chronic kidney disease, GERD, vitamin d deficiency, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. The resident was edentulous. Her cognition was moderately impaired. On 03/25/24 at 11:53 A.M., an interview with Resident #35 revealed she lost her dentures prior to admission and wanted a new set. On 03/27/24 at 2:40 P.M., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain resident care equipment and furnishings in a safe and sanitary condition. This affected two (Resident #10 and #26) of 24 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. On 03/25/24 at 11:00 A.M., an observation of Resident #10's bedside table revealed the walnut colored laminate on the tabletop was peeling back leaving rough, jagged edges that was a potential hazard that could cause skin tears. There was also a couple areas where the particle board that was under the laminate was exposed preventing the bedside table from being able to be adequately disinfected when cleaning. Resident #10 was legally blind with macular degeneration and was not able to see the condition in which her bedside table was in. On 03/26/24 at 12:00 P.M., ongoing observations of Resident #10's bedside table revealed it remained in disrepair. The bedside table was placed next to the resident's bed on the left side and had items on top of it within the resident's reach. Findings were verified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #183. On 03/26/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was provided with and signed an admission agreement upon the resident's admission into the facility that informed them of the resident's rights, services to the resident, and of the rules and regulations governing the resident's conduct and responsibilities during his stay in the facility. This affected one of one residents (#73) reviewed for the admission process. Findings include: A review of Resident #73's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included pneumoconiosis due to asbestos and other mineral fibers and alcohol abuse. His census revealed he was private pay hospice. A review of Resident #73's progress notes revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 P.M. from inpatient hospice. The hospice nurse was in prior to the resident's arrival in the facility and stated the resident's family would be in to sign paperwork. The resident was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of narcotic inventory sheet, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure contingency narcotics were reconciled every shift. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation and interview on 05/16/23 at 8:27 A.M., with LPN #123 revealed the contingency narcotic box was not doubled lock. The lock on the cabinet door was broke and the narcotic box was not affixed to the cabinet. The box had not been reconciled since 05/12/23 when it was delivered from the pharmacy. LPN #123 revealed she was not sure who was responsible for reconciliation of the narcotic box in the cabinet, however the 100-hall nurse was responsible for the narcotics in the refrigerator. The LPN confirmed the narcotic box had not been reconciled since 05/12/23 and the narcotics were not doubled locked nor affixed to the cabinet. Observation and Interview on 05/16/23 at 9:27 A.M., with LPN #131 (100-unit nurse) confirmed the contingency narcotic box had not been reconciled since 05/12/23 when pharmacy had delivered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of narcotic inventory sheet, review of control sheets, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled. This affected one resident (Resident #63) but had the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 05/16/23 at 8:27 A.M., with LPN #123 revealed the contingency narcotic box was not doubled lock. The lock on the cabinet door was broke and the narcotic box was not affixed to the cabinet. The LPN confirmed the narcotics were not doubled locked nor affixed to the cabinet. Observation and Interview on 05/16/23 at 9:27 A.M., with LPN #131 (100-unit nurse) revealed the narcotic box in the refrigerator contained 22 Marinol capsules that belonged to Resident #63 and the narcotic box was unlocked. The LPN reported the key for the refrigerator narcotic lock box had been missing for some time and the box wasn't locked. The LPN confirmed the medications were not doubled locked. The LPN also confirmed the cabinet lock had been broken for about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately inform/specify in writing, the services that would be discontinued. This affected two residents (Resident #71 and Resident #72) of three resident beneficiary notices reviewed. The census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were heart failure, cerebral infarction, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, and facial weakness. Review of his minimum data set assessment, dated 04/18/23, revealed he had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #71 beneficiary notice form, dated 04/22/23, revealed a discontinuation of services would end on that day. But the form did not give specific information as to what services would be discontinued. The form stated, the effective date coverage of your current skilled nursing facility will end: 04/22/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected two residents (Resident #21 and Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, nondisplaced fracture of greater trochanter of left femur, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety disorder (08/11/20), osteoarthritis, hypertension, and abnormal weight loss. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #21 PASRR document, dated 07/07/21, revealed under Section D, the only diagnosis listed was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all significant mental health changes were communicated to the state mental health agency. This affected two residents (Resident #21 and Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, nondisplaced fracture of greater trochanter of left femur, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety disorder (08/11/20), osteoarthritis, hypertension, and abnormal weight loss. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #21 PASRR document, dated 07/07/21, revealed under Section D, the only diagnosis listed was mood disorder. But review of her diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to Resident #55, who was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. This affected one resident (Resident #55) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 71. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the nursing progress notes, dated 01/26/23 through present, revealed no evidence that Resident #55 refused to have his finger nails trimmed. Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/02/23 revealed Resident #55 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The assessment indicated no behaviors or rejection of care. Review of the plan of care, dated 02/06/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, hospital record review, and interview the facility failed to timely provide intervention with a resident condition change resulting in hospitalization. This affected one resident (Resident #69) of one residents reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 71. Findings include: Closed record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, emphysema, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and peripheral vascular disease. The resident was treated for pneumonia with antibiotics during his hospitalization and had been intubated and placed on a ventilator related to the acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (prior to his admission to the facility). The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the admission physician orders revealed Cefdinir (antibiotic) 300 milligrams twice a day for five days and azithromycin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, financial record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate plan to spend down resident finances when it was above to Medicaid allowable limit. This affected three residents (Residents #39, #48, and #49) of six resident financial information reviewed. The census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were unspecified injury of head, type II diabetes, asthma, cerebral infarction, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, cerebral aneurysm, obesity, osteoarthritis, and repeated falls. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/06/23, revealed she mad a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39 quarterly financial statements, dated 07/01/22 to 03/31/23, revealed her total amount in her resident account varied between $3528.95 and $6526.46; it was never below $2000. Review of facility resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, review of drug inserts instruction sheet, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was not greater than five percent. Two medication errors out of 32 opportunities were observed resulting in a 6.25% medication error rate. This affected two residents (Resident #24 and #31) of four residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with chronic respiratory failure. Review of Resident #24's orders dated 05/2023 revealed to administer one inhalation (puff) of Symbicort 90-4.5 micrograms (mcg) twice daily for chronic respiratory failure. Observation on 05/16/23 at 9:11 A.M., of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #131 revealed LPN #131 administered two inhalations of Symbicort to Resident #23 and then administered the resident her by mouth pills without having the resident rinse or spit after the administration of Symbicort. The label on the Symbicort indicated to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication and glucose monitoring were completed to maintain sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of infections. This affected one resident (Resident #47) of four observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/16/23 at 8:23 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #123 revealed the nurse had a multi-use glucometer lying on the medication cart without a barrier. The nurse reported the glucometer was used for residents in 400 and 500 halls. The nurse picked up the glucometer and carried it into Resident #47 room without cleaning the glucometer and laid it on the residents table without a barrier. The nurse checked the resident blood sugar and then placed the used glucometer in her shirt pocket and left the resident's room. The LPN performed hand hygiene and then disposed of the lancets. She removed the glucometer and wiped it with a bleach wipe and placed the glucometer in a plastic disposable cup. She did not keep the glucometer wet. The nurse reported the glucometer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, McGeer Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist review and interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics administered for a urinary tract infection (UTI) met criteria prior to the administration of the antibiotic. This affected one resident (Resident #28) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infection. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, anemia, cirrhosis of the liver, chronic kidney disease, and a history of transient ischemic attacks and cerebral infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/07/23, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive, one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. The assessment indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHM OH WEST OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/28/2021 |
| OHIO CARE SKLD LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 12/28/2021 |
| DIPASQUA, JASON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/28/2021 |
| FISHMAN, SHMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/28/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366244. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.