No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aristocrat Berea Healthcare And Rehabilitation

255 Front Street, Berea, OH 44017 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 165 certified beds · (440) 243-4000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
201 Front St #101 · (440) 243-7299 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6 E Bagley Rd · (440) 891-9422 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
50 West Bridge Street
Park
Valley Parkway · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.8%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.5%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
39.8%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 165 beds and averages 136.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-01-11)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2021-05-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2019-12-04 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, facility policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, Physician #397 and Psychiatrist #398, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #152) who was diagnosed with mental disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder received appropriate care, treatment and interventions to meet the resident's individual needs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy that was actual harm when Resident #152, who was known to inflict personal injury, opened a previously self-inflicted wound with an electrical cord, made multiple self-harming body cuts, threatened to harm others and had suicidal ideation without appropriate action by the facility. On 11/21/19 at 5:30 P.M. the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Quality Assurance Nurse #396 were notified the Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/03/19 at 6:24 P.M. when the facility was notified Resident #152 was found in her room bleeding from a previous self-cutting wrist wound that she had re- opened with an electrical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-07-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and related facility investigation, review of hospital records, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #143 was free from an incident of resident-to-resident physical abuse. This affected one resident (#143) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 145. Actual harm occurred on 06/18/24 when Resident #143, who was cognitively impaired and had been independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) prior to 06/18/24, sustained a fall after being pushed by Resident #109, was sent to the local hospital emergency room for an examination on 06/18/24 and was found to have a left humerus (major upper arm bone) fracture. Although he returned to the facility on [DATE] he was sent out a second time to the hospital on [DATE] after complaints of right wrist pain developed at the facility and was diagnosed with a right wrist fracture. The facility investigation confirmed both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary living environment. This had the potential to affect all 137 residents in the facility.Findings Include:Observation on 08/29/25 at 8:20 A.M. revealed multiple items of food, dirt, and dust on the first floor dining room. Breakfast was being served at that time, but no residents were in the dining room. Observation during that time revealed an unidentified nursing staff person tell two residents in the hallway that the dining room was closed and they had to eat in their room.Observation on 08/29/25 from 9:05 A.M. to 9:15 A.M. revealed black soot on multiple ceiling tiles in the main laundry room. The black soot was caused by a dryer fire that happened in that room on approximately 05/29/25.Interview with the Housekeeping and Laundry Director #120 on 08/29/25 at 9:22 A.M. and 9:27 A.M. confirmed the black soot on the ceiling tiles. He confirmed the facility is waiting on the insurance claim to be approved prior to replacing all the affected items, including the new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the State Agency as required. This affected two residents (#13 and #22) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 137.Findings Include:1.Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/20/23. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, COPD, multiple sclerosis, dementia, hypertension, factitious disorder, hypertensive heart disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, psychosis disorder, osteoarthritis, personality disorder, hyperlipidemia, and glaucoma. Review of Resident #13 physician orders, dated 12/12/24 to 06/23/25, revealed an order for oxycodone five (5) milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for pain.Review of Resident #13 physician orders, dated 06/23/25 to current, revealed an order for oxycodone five (5) mg every 12 hours as needed for pain.Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/30/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility investigative document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of misappropriation as required. This affected two residents (#13 and #22) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 137.Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/20/23. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, COPD, multiple sclerosis, dementia, hypertension, factitious disorder, hypertensive heart disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, psychosis disorder, osteoarthritis, personality disorder, hyperlipidemia, and glaucoma. Review of Resident #13 physician orders, dated 12/12/24 to 06/23/25, revealed an order for oxycodone five (5) milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for pain.Review of Resident #13 physician orders, dated 06/23/25 to current, revealed an order for oxycodone five (5) mg every 12 hours as needed for pain.Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse as required. This affected one (Resident #63) of of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 143. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/24/25, revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact, had delusions, verbal outbursts directed towards others, and wandered. Review of a nurse note dated 03/10/25 timed 6:45 A.M. revealed Resident #63 was verbally abusive, intrusive and arguing with staff and residents. Further review of the nurses notes from February 2025 to current revealed no information related to Resident #63 making an allegation of nursing staff twisting her arm. Interview on 04/03/25 at 9:05 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary preferences were followed. This had the potential to affect all residents, except Resident #68, who the facility identified as receiving no food or drink by mouth (NPO) from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Interview on 01/08/25 at 8:47 A.M. with Resident #17 revealed she always received Kool-Aid as her drink for breakfast. Resident #17 revealed Kool-Aid was not considered a breakfast drink, and she was sick of getting it all the time. Interview on 01/08/25 at 8:53 A.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #808 revealed residents received Kool-Aid as a drink with the breakfast meal. CNA #808 revealed residents preferred orange juice, tea, and coffee. Interview on 01/08/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #820 revealed residents often complained about receiving Kool-Aid with their breakfast meals. Interview on 01/08/25 at 10:27 A.M. with LPN #855 revealed residents often received Kool-Aid with their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure temperatures in the facility were at a comfortable level. This affected nineteen residents (#11, #17, #38, #44, #45, #47, #49, #58, #61, #77, #82, #97, #119, #123, #124, #125, #129, #136, #140) of twenty-nine residing on the 1 East Unit located on the first floor and two residents (#30, #109) of seventeen residing on the 2 East Unit located on the second floor. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Observation on 01/08/25 from 8:00 A.M. to 8:55 A.M., during tour of the 1 East Unit, revealed a cold and chilled breeze circulating throughout the unit. Interview and observation on 01/08/25 at 8:47 A.M. with Resident #82, who resided on the 1 East Unit, revealed it was cold in her room. Resident #82 was observed lying in bed with a sheet and blanket wrapped around her. Interview and observation on 01/08/25 at 8:49 A.M. with Resident #38, who resided on the 1 East Unit, revealed she was always cold. Resident #38 revealed her bed was located up against the wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure facility equipment was maintained to ensure residents received the care pertaining to their needs and preferences. This affected one resident (#17) of one resident, but had the potential to affect five additional residents (#11, #74, #86, #98, #133) residing on the 1 East Unit, who required a mechanical lift. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, and hypertensive heart disease. Review of the 5-Day, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was alert and oriented with cognitive impairment. Resident #17 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #17's physician orders dated 04/09/24 revealed an order for Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment and water temperatures were at a comfortable level. This affected seventeen residents (#10, #20, #26, #30, #34, #41, #56, #70, #76, #78, #92, #101, #109, #118, #127, #130, #134) of seventeen residing on the 2 East Unit located on the second floor and forty-one residents (#1, #2, #5, #6, #7, #8, #15, #16, #19, #23, #27, #28, #31, #32, #35, #36, #46, #50, #51, #52, #53, #59, #71, #73, #75, #80, #88, #89, #96, #99, #100, #102, #112, #113, #114, #116, #121, #122, #131, #135, #137) of forty-one residing on the 3 East and 3 [NAME] Units located on the third floor. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Interview and observation on 01/08/25 at 10:05 A.M. with Resident #58 revealed his room was always dirty. Observation of Resident #58 room, shared with Resident's #49 and #123, revealed Resident #123 bed had multiple areas of food crumbs with brown and yellow substance-stained bed linen. Resident #49's bed linen was stained with brown stains with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was treated with dignity. This affected one resident (#8) of one reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, and hypothyroidism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten that indicated Resident #8 had cognitive impairment. Resident #8 required setup or clean-up assistance for eating. Review of Resident #8's physician orders dated 05/29/19 revealed an order for a no added salt diet, pureed texture with thin consistency. Review of the care plan dated 10/13/24 revealed Resident #8 had a nutritional risk related to schizoaffective disorder with interventions that included provide and serve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's privacy was maintained. This affected one resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality. The facility census was 145. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 09/03/24. Diagnoses included psychosis, impulse disorder, and alcohol dependence with alcohol induced dementia. Resident #3 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], re-entered 09/10 24, was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], re-entered 10/01/24, and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition. Behaviors included hallucinations, delusions, physical behavioral symptoms, verbal behavioral symptoms, and other behavioral symptoms. Review of the Facility Bulletin Board, on the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) screen revealed on 09/17/24 the administrator posted that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 140. Findings include: Observation of the facility's ice machine on 08/01/24 at 7:45 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #924 revealed the main ice machine was not working and had been out of service since 06/24/24. DM #924 explained that the facility was awaiting parts to replace the unit and the facility was temporarily using the ice machine on the second floor to meet its needs. Observation of the second floor ice machine on 08/01/24 at 9:11 A.M. with DM #924 revealed the top portion of the ice machine had a large area of slimly brown and green mold. The machine also had a noticeable musty smell when opened. DM #924 verified the condition of the ice machine at the time of observation. Review of the policy clean schedules dated 10/01/21 revealed culinary manager or designee monitors sanitation of department and assigns correction as needed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observations the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary resident environment. This affected 68 residents who used the showers (#1, #4, #5, #13, #17, #22, #23, #29, #31, #32, #35, #41, #46, #48, #52, #55, #56, #70, #71, #73, #75, #87, #88, #89, #93, #96, #97, #100, #102, #104,#112, #113, #114, #129, #132, #134, #135, #10, #14, #19, #26, #34, #37, #43, #44, #45, #47, #60, #61, #63, #67, #72, #77, #79, #80, #82, #85, #98. #107, #116, #119, #122, #123, #124, #128, #130, #131, #133, and #137) and 21 residents who ate in the dining room on the third-floor secured unit (#7, #9, #20, #24, #27, #28, #30, #33, #38, #51, #57, #59, #64, #65, #78, #92, #99, #101, #110, #118, and #126). Facility census was 140. Findings include: Interview on 07/31/24 at 9:17 A.M. with Resident #32 who resided on the third-floor unit revealed the shower was nasty. Resident #32 said a resident with a colostomy bag used the shower room leaving feces all over the toilet and shower floor. Observation on 07/31/24 at 9:30 A.M. of the third-floor dining room revealed staff and residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely assessment of residents and review of the risks and benefits of bed rails with the residents after removing all bed rails that were currently in place and being used by the residents. This affected six (Resident #7, #12, #16, #85, #131, and Resident #133) of 19 residents whose side rails and grab bars were removed. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility also failed to provide timely incontinence care to prevent incontinence dermatitis. This affected one (Resident #66) of three reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: 1. Interview on 07/31/24 at 9:32 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 revealed management removed all the bed rails from resident beds leaving residents dependent on staff for mobility and transfers. LPN #202 stated it made it more difficult on staff because the residents were leaning and grabbing on the staff for help. Interview on 07/31/24 at 10:00 A.M. with LPN #211 revealed all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #133 related to the use of bed side rails which assisted Resident #133 with bed mobility and getting in and out of bed. This affected one (Resident #133) of six residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #133 revealed an admission date of 03/21/17. Diagnoses included unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, schizophrenia, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the plan of care dated 07/28/22 revealed Resident #133 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to schizophrenia, muscle weakness and use of psychoactive medications. The interventions listed did not include use of side rails or grab bars to the bed. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/06/24, revealed Resident #133 had intact cognition, was independent for rolling left to right while in bed and required touch assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were redirected from safety hazards affecting Resident #135 and failed to ensure bed rails were not removed prior to assessing the resident's ability to exit the bed safely without the rails affecting Resident #133. This affected two of six residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #133 revealed an admission date of 03/21/17. Diagnoses included unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, schizophrenia, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the plan of care dated 07/28/22 revealed Resident #133 had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to schizophrenia, muscle weakness and use of psychoactive medications. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/06/24, revealed Resident #133 had intact cognition. Resident #133 was independent for rolling left to right while in bed. Review of the facility Side/Bed Rail Utilization assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and observation the facility did not ensure there was sufficient linens including washcloths, towels and fitted sheets available. This affected 117 residents (all residents on unit one, all residents on unit two South and West, and all residents on unit three including Residents #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #13, #15, #16, #17, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, 24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #50, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #64, #65, #67, #68, #69, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, #93, #94, #95,#96, #97, #98, #99, #100, #101, #102, #103, #104, #107, #108, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #117, #118, #119, #120, #122, #123, #125, #126, #127, #129, #130, #131, #132, #133, #134, #135, #136, #137, #242, #243, and #292). The facility census was 138. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #50 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and even flooring for dietary staff who provide meal service for residents. This had the potential to affect 137 out of 138 residents in the facility as Resident #72 received nothing by mouth. Findings Include: Observation on 01/09/24 at 12:38 P.M. during lunch meal service revealed the floor in the kitchen had a depressed area for equipment. Part of the area no longer contained any food preparation equipment. The food plating area butted up against the area. The person serving had to step in and out of the uneven area. Interview on 01/09/24 at 12:38 P.M. with Dietary Manager #377 verified there was uneven flooring and the person serving meals stepped in and out of the area. Interview on 01/09/24 at 12:42 P.M. Administrator #444 verified the uneven flooring. Review of a facility list of resident diets revealed Resident #72 received nothing by mouth.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and review of facility incontinence policy ,the facility did not ensure timely incontinence care was completed for Resident #50. This affected one resident (Resident #50) out of two residents (Residents #50 and #96) reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 138. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 10/20/23 and diagnoses included cerebral infarction, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of care plan dated 10/23/23 revealed Resident #50 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to schizophrenia and psychosis. Interventions included she was dependent on staff for her toileting, hygiene, dressing, and bed mobility needs. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. She was dependent on staff assistance with toileting and rolling left and right. She was frequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to offer Resident #111 an influenza and pneumococcal vaccine. This affected one resident (Resident #111) out of five residents (Resident #34, #38, #69, #111, #242) reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. The facility census is 138. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #111 admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, unspecified psychosis, cerebral palsy and Parkinson's. Resident #111's Brief Interview Mental Status (cognitive assessment) revealed Resident #111 was moderately impaired for cognition. Record review completed on 01/08/24 of Resident #111's immunizations revealed Resident #111 had not been offered the influenza or pneumococcal vaccine. Interview with Director of Nursing on 01/10/24 at 2:20 P. M. revealed Resident #111's Power of Attorney was asked for consent for the Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine on 01/09/24. The Power of Attorney agreed for the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a test tray and interview the facility failed to provide palatable meals. This had the potential to affect all residents, except Resident #84 who was identified as not receiving meals from the kitchen related to a nothing by mouth (NPO) status. The facility census was 133. Findings include: A test tray was requested on 11/06/23 at 12:21 P.M. The test tray left the kitchen at 12:24 P.M. and was on the floor at 12:26 P.M. The test tray was completed at 1:02 P.M. after the last resident received their meal tray. The test tray consisted of a pork chop, cheesy hashbrowns and Brussels sprouts. The pork chop was cold, dry and lacked flavor, the hashbrowns were undercooked, cold, had clumps of unmelted cheese on top, and lacked flavor, the Brussels sprouts were cold, mushy and lacked flavor. Dietary Manager (DM) #301, who was present during the test tray, did not test the food but indicated she did not need to taste the food, she knew the food was cold. DM #301 stated she was aware of resident complaints regarding food and had been trying to make improvements since she began…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was treated in a [NAME] that enhanced his quality of life and promoted his rights. The facility also failed to ensure residents had private unrestricted communications including the telephone, mail, and newspaper delivery. This affected all 19 (Residents #2, #6, #17, #26, #32, #50, #52, #54, #55, #59, #66, #68, #71, #76, #81, #88, #117, #124, and #133) residents residing on the second floor secured unit. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major recurrent depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder in partial remission mixed, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, chronic fatigue, chronic migraine, and alcohol dependence uncomplicated. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had private unrestricted communications including telephone use. This affected all 19 (Residents #2, #6, #17, #26, #32, #50, #52, #54, #55, #59, #66, #68, #71, #76, #81, #88, #117, #124, and #133) residents residing on the second floor secured unit. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major recurrent depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder in partial remission mixed, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, chronic fatigue, chronic migraine, and alcohol dependence uncomplicated. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was alert, oriented, and independent in daily decision-making ability. He displayed indicators of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility did not ensure nursing staff administered medications within the acceptable parameters of time. This affected three (Residents #6, #24, and #76) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medication administration audit reports revealed Resident #6 received 190 doses of routinely scheduled doses of anti-anxiety, anti-flatulence and laxative medications beyond 60 minutes after the physician ordered times. There was evidence the resident received two doses of anti-anxiety medications at the same time on seven days, anti-flatulence medications on seven days and laxative medications on five days since 04/01/21. Review of the medication administration audit reports revealed Resident #24 received 167 doses of routinely scheduled doses of anticholinergic medication, three antipsychotic medications and phenyltriazine medications beyond 60 minutes after the physician ordered times. Review of the medication administration audit reports…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of manufacturer's guidelines on insulin storage, the facility failed to ensure multi-dose insulin vials were dated with the date they were opened. This affected two (Residents #42 and #90) of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Observation on 05/19/21 at 2:30 P.M. of the the front medication cart on the one East Wing of the facility revealed an insulin vial for Resident #42 and an insulin injection pen for Resident #90 that were not dated with the date these insulins were opened. Another insulin injection pen that did not have a resident's name on it was also opened and not dated with the date it was first opened. Observation of the back cart on the East Wing revealed a lantus insulin pen which did not have a resident's name on it, and was also not dated with the date it was opened. Interview on 05/19/21 at 3:00 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse #587 verified the above insulins were not dated. Review of the facility policy titled Administration and Documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore face mask per guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This had the potential to affect all 37 residents (Residents #4, #8, #11, #13, #16, #18, #24, #25, #29, #34, #35, #37, #40, #44, #45, #46, #65, #70, #74, #77, #78, #86, #97, #100, #104, #107, #110, #114, #116, #118, #119, #123, #124, #125, #129, #137, and #139) who resided on the third floor secured unit. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Observation on 05/18/21 at 11:15 A.M., upon coming onto the third floor secured unit from the elevator walking toward the nurses station, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #575 leaving the dining room, not wearing a facemask, and stop at the nurse's cart. The surveyor also observed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #540 sitting in a chair behind the mobile computer, next to the nurse's cart, face mask pulled down under chin, eating a bag of potato chips. LPN #575 then asked STNA #540 to pull up her mask. Interview on 05/18/21 at 11:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice in psychiatrist, interact with members of the community outside the facility, and choose schedules of medication and appointments with providers of his their choosing. This affected one (Resident #6) of seven residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major recurrent depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder in partial remission mixed, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, chronic fatigue, chronic migraine, and alcohol dependence uncomplicated. Review of the comprehensive assessment Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was alert, oriented, and independent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of facility investigation reports, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were implemented relative to reporting allegations of abuse to adminstration, initiating abuse allegations timely, and protecting residents from further abuse while an investigation is in process. This affected two (Residents #70 and #80) of five residents reviewed for abuse allegations. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 09/09/16. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behaviors, and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, and supervision with set up help only for transfers, eating, and toilet use. Interview on 05/10/21 at 1:26 P.M. with Resident #70 revealed State Tested Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents plan of care included interventions for physical immobility. This affected one (Resident #112) of 10 residents reviewed for restorative services. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included schizophrenia, pressure ulcer of sacral region (Stage 4), gastrostomy, dementia and blindness of one eye. Review of this resident's Minimum Data Set 3.0 Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment. She needed extensive assistance of two people for all activities of daily living including toileting and personal hygiene. Review of this resident's MDS dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment. She needed extensive assistance of two people for all activities of daily living including toileting and personal hygiene. At the time of this survey, this resident was bed bound with a urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included schizophrenia, pressure ulcer of sacral region (Stage 4), gastrostomy, dementia, and blindness of one eye. Review of this resident's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment. She needed extensive assistance of two people for all activities of daily living including toileting and personal hygiene. Review of this resident's plan of care for nutrition dated 04/03/19 revealed the resident had a nutritional problem related to past medical history of acute respiratory failure, type II diabetes, constipation, hypotentions and schizophrenia. She was receiving a tube feeding at the present time that runs continuously. Review of the interventions for this plan of care included: Administer medications as ordered; Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered; Provide and serve diet as ordered; and Monitor for intake record every meal. On 05/13/21 at 12:30 P.M. a copy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a restorative program was implemented to further meet the needs of its residents. This affected one (Resident #112) of 10 residents reviewed for restorative services. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included schizophrenia, pressure ulcer of sacral region (Stage 4), gastrostomy, dementia, and blindness of one eye. Review of this resident's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment. She needed extensive assistance of two people for all activities of daily living including toileting and personal hygiene. At the time of this survey, this resident was bed bound with a urinary catheter in place and a wound vac. She did not get out of bed and was dependent on staff for repositioning and exercising. Review of this resident's Restorative Care Program Notes from therapy, dated 05/06/21, revealed she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper pericare was provided to Resident #112. This affected one (Resident #112) of two residents reviewed who had urinary catheters. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included schizophrenia, pressure ulcer of sacral region (Stage 4), gastrostomy, dementia, and blindness of one eye. Review of this resident's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment. She needed extensive assistance of two people for all activities of daily living including toileting and personal hygiene. The bowel and bladder section of this MDS showed the resident did have an indwelling urinary catheter to gravity drainage. On 05/19/21 at 1:15 P.M. the surveyor observed catheter care for this resident which was completed by Unit Manager (UM) #654. During the cleaning of the catheter, this nurse also cleaned her perineal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the nutritional status for one resident (Resident #59). This affected one (Resident #59) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphgia, diabetes, major depression, seizures, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was rarely understood and was severely cognitively impaired. The resident required extensive assistance with one staff member for eating and had sustained weight loss and was not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. Review of Resident #59's weight history revealed on 09/21/20 she weighed 136 pounds and on 03/03/21 she weighed 115 pounds indicating a 15.44 percent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were stopped while laying a resident flat to provide care. This affected one (Resident #112) of three residents who were receiving a tube feeding. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included schizophrenia, pressure ulcer of sacral region (Stage 4), gastrostomy, dementia, and blindness of one eye. Review of this resident's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment. She needed extensive assistance of two people for all activities of daily living including toileting and personal hygiene. Review of this resident's physician orders dated 04/10/21 revealed the physician ordered a tube feeding of Diabetasource which was to be administered 80 cc continuously. There was also a physician's order dated 04/15/21 for the head of the resident's bed to be elevated 30 degrees or greater while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient trained staff available to supervise and effectively implement interventions for residents who have mental disorders and demonstrated behaviors affecting other residents at the facility. This affected two (Residents #112 and #142) of five residents reviewed for behavioral needs. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical records of Resident #142 revealed an admission date of 03/08/21 and a discharge date of 03/25/21. The resident's diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, symbolic dysfunction, and hearing loss. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, dated 03/15/21, revealed Resident #142 was moderately cognitively impaired, highly hearing impaired and required supervision with setup help only. Review of Resident #142's care plan revealed resident had a behavior problem related to yelling/screaming out, demonstrating threatening behavior, and demonstrating repeat movements. An intervention, initiated on 03/16/21, was to intervene as necessary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the source of Resident #6's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to provide appropriate treatment and services to identify triggers and possible interventions. This affected one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major recurrent depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder in partial remission mixed, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, chronic fatigue, chronic migraine, and alcohol dependence uncomplicated. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was alert, oriented, and independent in daily decision-making ability. He displayed indicators of psychosis including hallucinations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive abuse policy and procedure to ensure adequate screening systems were in place for all employees prior to hire. The facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure all employees were checked against the Nurse-Aide Registry (NAR). This affected six of 18 employees whose personnel files were reviewed (Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #281, LPN #292, Registered Nurse (RN) #370 and RN #371). In addition, the facility identified six additional nurses (LPN #298, LPN #297, LPN #293, LPN #286, RN #306 and RN #361) who had been hired since 09/10/18 who had not been checked against the nurse aide registry. This had the potential to affect all 163 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel list and personnel files revealed six of 18 employees whose personnel files were reviewed had not been checked against the State NAR at the time of hire. The Administrator was hired on 08/26/19. The DON was hired on 09/16/19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 163 residents who resided in the facility, as all residents consumed food by mouth. Findings include: Observation on 11/18/19 from 8:45 A.M. to 9:02 A.M. during the initial kitchen observation, with Dietary Manager (DM) #374 present revealed the following concerns: 1. There was one carton of unopened thickened dairy with a best use by date of 11/02/19. 2. The vents over the oven and stove tops had black debris on them. 3. In the dry storage room, there was a large bag of opened bread crumbs that were not closed or sealed. DM #374 confirmed these observations at the time. DM #374 revealed the hood system was cleaned every six months, and maintenance would be cleaning the vents in November 2019 at some point. 4. Observation on 11/20/19 at 8:45 A.M. of [NAME] #382 pureeing roast beef, revealed she wore gloves, and continued to touch the outside of blender with her gloved hand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided a dignified dining experience and failed to ensure staff interacted with residents in a dignified manner. This affected four residents (#303, #56, #37 and #12) of 163 residents residing in the facility who were observed during dining and for dignity. Findings include: On 11/18/19 at 12:27 P.M. observation of the lunch meal in the third floor dining room revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #221 and STNA #200 were assisting residents to eat. Both STNAs conversed with each other but did not converse with the residents, Resident #56 and Resident #12 who they were assisting. STNA #221 stood up from the table and directed other residents in a firm voice to sit down and sit there. Resident #303 requested her meal be re-heated as it was cold. STNA #221 told Resident #303 that it would be a while, she was busy. The above findings was verified by STNA #221 at the time of the observation. On 11/18/19 at 12:38 P.M. interview with STNA #221 revealed she should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and review of the food temperature guidelines, the facility failed to ensure food items were served at appropriate temperatures. This affected five residents (#25, #134, #106, #107 and #303) and had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing on the third floor of the facility. The facility census was 163. Findings include: 1. On 11/18/19 at 12:27 P.M. observation of the lunch meal on the third floor revealed the facility of used a food cart with one side (left) of the cart refrigerated for cold foods and the other side (right) insulated for hot foods. The lunch meal trays for five residents, Resident #25, #134, #106, #107 and #303) were observed to be on the cold side of the cart. The trays were very cold to touch resulting in the food items on the trays being cold. This was verified by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #221 at the time of the observation. There was no evidence the facility obtained new hot meal trays for these five residents but rather they were served the meal trays from the cold side of the cart. The lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #21 and Resident #120's rooms were maintained at a comfortable temperature. This affected two residents (#21 and #120) of 44 residents who were interviewed related to environmental concerns. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, high blood pressure, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and independent for the majority of his personal care. Record review revealed Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, diabetes, dementia, psychosis, and a stroke. Review of the MDS 3.0 quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was identified to be non-interviewable. On 11/18/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify Resident #35 or the resident's representative when the resident's personal fund account was within $200.00 of the eligibility limit for Medicaid. This affected one resident (#35) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. Findings include: Review of the personal fund account statement for Resident #35 from 04/01/19 through 11/18/19 revealed he had received a check in the amount of $5,371.02 made out to the facility in his name. The check was dated 04/09/19. This brought the balance of his personal funds account to $5,471.02. The account balance remained at a minimum amount of $5,168.23 to a maximum amount of $6,404.07 until 11/18/19. On 11/18/19, a care cost payment of $4,000.00 was withdrawn from this account bringing the balance to $1,168.23. An interview on 11/20/19 at 1:10 P.M. with [NAME] President of Financial Management #400 revealed a notice should have been issued when the balance of Resident #35's account was within $200.00 of the maximum amount allowed. She stated, the facility would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide Resident #352 personal privacy while performing tracheostomy care. This affected one resident (#352) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #352 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, a tracheostomy (a surgically implanted tube in the throat to allow a person to breathe), pneumonia, a gastrostomy (a surgically implanted device to provide nutrition) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tracheostomy (trach) care was observed on 11/20/19 at 11:35 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #290. LPN #290 entered the room and explained to Resident #352 she was going to do his trach care then proceeded to set up her equipment. The door to the resident's room was open and the privacy curtain was not pulled to prevent people in the hallway from observing care. LPN #290 performed the entire procedure in full view of people…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #124 was free from misappropriation. This affected one resident (#124) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation of property. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #124 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/17/19 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), dated 11/03/19 revealed an allegation of misappropriation involving Resident ##124. The SRI revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #401 had two of Resident #124's credit cards in her purse. On 11/20/19 4:10 P.M. interview with the Administrator revealed STNA #401 had been terminated for misappropriation of resident property after she had been found with Resident #124's credit cards in her possession. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a timely Preadmission Screening/ Resident Review (PAS/RR) assessment was completed at the time of the 30 day Hospital Exemption for Resident #146. This affected one resident (#146) of one resident reviewed for PAS/RR screening. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including Down Syndrome. Record review revealed Resident #146 was admitted with a Hospital Exemption from Preadmission Screening Notification screen (Job and Family Services Form (JFS) 07000). This screen was completed by the discharging hospital and indicated Resident #146 required fewer than 30 days of nursing facility services. The JFS 07000 form stated the facility accepted responsibility for requesting a resident review (if required) prior to the 30th day following admission from the hospital. Resident #146's record review and electronic record review were silent as to a resident review secondary to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #125, who required staff assistance for personal care received adequate and timely assistance with personal hygiene including shaving. This affected one resident (#125) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #125 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness, and chronic pain. Resident #125's five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact and she required extensive two person assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #125's medical record revealed no evidence the resident declined assistance with shaving facial hair. Observation on 11/18/19 at 2:19 P.M. revealed Resident #125 had facial hair on her upper lip and chin. Interview with Resident #125 at the time of the observation revealed her son used to shave her, but he does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #120 and Resident #131 were served the right portion size of pureed cabbage casserole. This affected two residents (#120 and #131) of four residents reviewed for pureed meal service. Findings include: Review of the Portion Control Chart revealed a number 16 scoop size was 1/4 cup and a number eight scoop size was 1/2 a cup. Review of the lunch Menu Extension spreadsheet for 11/18/19 revealed residents on a pureed diet should be served pureed stuffed cabbage casserole with a number eight scoop. Observation on 11/18/19 at 12:15 P.M. revealed Resident #120 and Resident #131 were served a pureed lunch in the dining room. Observation on 11/18/19 at 12:17 P.M. with [NAME] #382 revealed the cook served Resident #120 and Resident #131 a pureed diet stuffed cabbage casserole using a number 16 scoop (1/4 cup) instead of the required number eight scoop (1/2 cup) identified on the menu spreadsheet. [NAME] #382 confirmed this was not the correct serving size and revealed Resident #120 and Resident #131 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-04 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #74 received timely assistance in scheduling an ear, nose, and throat specialist appointment. This affected one resident (#74) of two residents reviewed for vision and hearing. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder and unspecified ear tinnitus. Interview on 11/18/19 at 2:40 P.M. with Resident #74 revealed she told facility staff she was dealing with dizziness. Resident #74 revealed before she was admitted her doctor said she had water in her ears and if it did not get better she would have to get tubes in her ears. Resident #74 revealed when she gets up and raises her head, the room spins. Resident #74 revealed the facility said they would get her in to see a doctor as she has been reporting these symptoms since admission. Record review revealed Resident #74's physician orders included an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices for Resident #146 related to the storage of respiratory equipment and during wound care, for Resident #352 during tracheostomy care and while handling Resident #149's dirty linens to prevent the spread of infection. This affected two residents (#146 and #352) related to respiratory care, one resident (#146) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and one resident (#149) of 33 residents observed for general infection control procedures. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including respiratory failure, surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, Down syndrome and pressure ulcer of sacral region. Resident #146's five day Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was severely impaired for decision making. a. Resident #146's physician's orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-05-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the second floor dining room chairs in good condition. This had the potential to affect all 19 (Residents #2, #6, #17, #26, #32, #50, #52, #54, #55, #59, #66, #68, #71, #76, #81, #88, #177, #124, and #133) residents residing on the second floor secured behavioral unit. The facility census was 141 residents. Findings include: On 05/10/21 at 12:37 P.M. dining services were observed in the second floor secured behavioral unit. All 19 residents (Residents #2, #6, #17, #26, #32, #50, #52, #54, #55, #59, #66, #68, #71, #76, #81, #88, #177, #124, and #133) ate in the dining room. The dining room chairs were observed to have padded arms that were split, with multiple chairs having the foam exposed rendering them from being cleaned properly. There were three high back vinyl chair where the finish on the wood arms was completely worn off and the seats were split with the foam exposed. On 05/11/21 at 9:49 A.M., Resident #25's room was observed, which had 15 tiles that had imbedded black scuff marks. A wardrobe had been placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5's mattress was maintained in good repair. This affected one resident (#5) of five residents reviewed for equipment. Findings Include: On 11/18/19 at 3:18 P.M. an interview with Resident #5 revealed concerns that his mattress was torn on the side of the mattress. Resident #5 stated it had been torn for a long time. On 11/18/19 at 3:20 P.M. observation of Resident #5's mattress revealed it was ripped approximately two foot on the side seam of the mattress. Interview on 11/25/19 at 9:58 A.M. with Housekeeper (HK) #347 revealed each residents shower days, their mattress was to be wiped down. HK #347 revealed if a tear was noticed at that time, staff should put a work order in to maintenance for a replacement mattress. Observation on 11/25/19 at 10:00 A.M. of Resident #5's mattress revealed the mattress still had a ripped seam approximately two foot long. Interview on 11/25/19 at 10:07 A.M. with State Tested Nurses Assistant (STNA) #256 revealed linen were changed on shower days and as needed. At the time the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-01 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AJ R&R HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2018
EXTENDED OHIO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 08/01/2019
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
ARISTOCRAT BEREA PROPCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
CERTUS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2026
APPLEBY, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ELBADAWY, EMADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 1%Other / private 6%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,298per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$292per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365608. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-01-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next