Benedictine Care Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 40.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to identify and act on a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was care planned for potential infections, had a fever and was experiencing hallucinations which was an atypical symptom. This delay in treatment resulted in an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she was diagnosed with sepsis and was hospitalized . The IJ began on 2/21/26, when R1's vital signs indicated a temperature of 101.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and she was demonstrating other signs of illness such as vomiting, visible shaking, hallucinations, disruptive behavior, reports of pain, and crying with no nursing assessment conducted and the provider was not contacted. R1's symptoms continued until she was brought to the emergency department (ED), had a temperature of 102.8 degrees F, a physical appearance described as ill and toxic appearing and was diagnosed with septic shock and had to be hospitalized . The administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) received necessary medical attention following a change in a left hip surgical incision. Additionally, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and document skin changes. R1 sustained actual harm and required hospitalization, surgery, and insertion of a peripherally inserted central line catheter (PICC) for intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment for sepsis. Findings include: R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified mechanical ground level fall after losing her balance and sustained a left subtrochanteric femur fracture. She required surgery that included an surgical open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the left hip and tramedullary nailing of left femur. Surgical incision noted to left hip with dressing. R1's progress notes from 8/25/25 through 9/10/25, identified: -8/25/25 at 2:57 p.m. Weekly Skin Check: R1 continued with stapes to surgical incision on the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' assessed needs and provide required care and services. The facility's staffing shortages resulted in delayed toileting assistance, delayed eating assistance, loss of dignity, and transfers performed contrary to assessed needs and facility policy for 2 of 6 residents (R23, R24) reviewed in the sample requiring staff assistance with quality-of-care needs. The facility's ongoing staffing shortages had the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705 D identified the following:FY [fiscal year] Quarter 3 2025 (April 1 - June 30) identified the metric for excessively low weekend staffing was triggered. The trigger is defined as submitted staffing data that was excessively low.FY Quarter 4 2025 (July1 -September 30) identified the metric for excessively low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program that included a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to timely initiate and consistently implement transmission-based precautions for 2 of 2 residents (R12. R24) reviewed who exhibited signs and symptoms of potentially infectious diarrhea; failed to consistently identify and monitor residents exhibiting signs and symptoms of potential infection through the facility's surveillance system for 2 of 2 residents (R7, R24) reviewed for infection surveillance; failed to ensure staff adhered to infection prevention practices related to hand hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (R24) reviewed for activities of daily living; and failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for 2 of 5 residents (R6, R7) reviewed who met criteria for enhanced barrier precautions. These…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to develop comprehensive, person-centered care plan to include enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 3 of 5 residents (R6, R7, R1) reviewed who were identified to be on EBP.Findings include: R6 R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R6 had intact cognition and required moderate assistance with bathing. R6 had an abdominal feeding tube (G-tube). Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, narcolepsy, anxiety, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R6's care plan with review date 6/1/26, identified R8 was frequently incontinent of bladder. Approaches included for staff to provide peri care two times per day and as needed (PRN) when incontinent. R8's care plan also identified R8 has special treatment/procedures related to the presence of a G-tube. Approaches included to provide daily care and observance of R8's G-tube to ensure patency and usefulness. The care plan failed to include instructions for EBP related to when staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified care was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R24) reviewed for dignity. Staff encouraged R24 to remain incontinent rather than assisting her to the toilet when requested, resulting in embarrassment, and loss of dignity. Findings include: R24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24 had a mild cognitive impairment and had diagnoses that included non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, diabetes, and dementia. R24 was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers and was frequently incontinent with bowel and bladder.R24's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/11/26, identified R24 was a recent admit from another care center and had diagnoses of dementia, depression, heart failure and asthma. R24 had clear speech and was understood and usually understood. R24 denied shortness of breath. R24 stated she had pain per medication administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident grievance regarding a missing hearing aid was fully investigated, documented, resolved, and communicated to the resident representative in accordance with facility policy for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: R5's Customer Concern/Grievance dated 5/20/26, identified family member (FM)-A reported R5's hearing aid was missing. The facility documented an initial search of the room, bedding, and laundry; however, no further investigation, follow-up, or resolution was documented. R5's progress notes from 5/20/26 through 6/6/26 contained no documentation regarding the missing hearing aid or grievance follow-up. During an interview on 6/9/26 at 2:33 p.m., the social services designee (SSD) acknowledged receiving the grievance but stated it had been assigned to another person and no outcome had been communicated. During an interview on 6/9/26 at 3:48 p.m., FM-A reported she had not received any updates or information regarding the grievance after filing the concern. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to review and justify continued use of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 residents (R8) who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R8 had moderate cognitive deficit and required moderate assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R8 had not exhibited any behavior during the observation period and did not have hallucinations or delusions. R8 received antianxiety and antidepressant medications during the observation period. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, dementia, diabetes, and depression. R8's undated Active Physician Orders, identified numerous medication orders for R8, which included haloperidol (antipsychotic) 1 milligram (MG) for agitation and restlessness every four hours PRN with start date 3/1/26 and end date was listed as open ended. R8's care plan dated 3/23/26, identified R8 was under hospice care for end-of-life status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care and services necessary to maintain residents' abilities by failing to provide timely toileting assistance for 1 of 6 residents (R24) reviewed who required staff assistance with toileting and transfers; and failed to provide timely supervision and assistance with eating for 1 of 6 residents (R23) reviewed who required staff assistance during meals. Findings include: R24: R24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24 had mild cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers and was frequently incontinent with bowel and bladder. Diagnoses included non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, diabetes, and dementia. R24's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/11/26, identified R24 was a recent admit from another care center and had diagnoses of dementia, depression, heart failure and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes during pressure ulcer wound care for 1 of 2 residents (R5) reviewed for pressure ulcers, creating the potential for contamination of pressure ulcer wounds and development of infection. Findings include:R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 was cognitively intact. R5 was substantial/maximal assist with transfers, and supervision with bed mobility. R5's diagnosis includes fracture of thoracic (mid back) vertebrae, muscle weakness, and amputation of right lower leg. It identified the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers but did not have one. R5's pressure ulcer/injury Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/8/26, identified R5 was at risk for pressure ulcers due to recent injury with a fracture of thoracic vertebra. Plan of care updated for prevention of pressure related skin impairments. R5's provider's orders identified the following:6/1/26, identified for left heel,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure transfers were performed in accordance with assessed needs, care plan interventions, and facility policy for 1 of 3 residents (R24) reviewed for accidents. Staff performed transfers using a full-body mechanical lift with one staff member rather than the required two staff members, creating the potential for falls, entrapment, and transfer-related injury. Findings include:R24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24 had a mild cognitive impairment and had diagnoses that included non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, diabetes, and dementia. R24 was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers and was frequently incontinent with bowel and bladder.R24's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/11/26, identified R24 was a recent admit from another care center and had diagnoses of dementia, depression, heart failure and asthma. R24 had clear speech and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a reported medication error was investigated, documented, and addressed in accordance with facility policy for 1 of 5 residents (R37) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice resulted in the facility's inability to determine the circumstances surrounding a reported Zepbound medication error, assess resident impact, and implement interventions to prevent recurrence.Findings include: R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R37 had a moderate cognitive impairment and had diagnoses that included morbid obesity, cerebral palsy and obstructive sleep apnea. R37's Event Report dated 4/23/26 at 9:37 a.m., identified Zepbound (an FDA-approved, once-weekly injectable medication containing tripeptide. It is prescribed alongside a reduced-calorie diet and increased exercise for chronic weight management in adults with obesity or those who are overweight with weight-related conditions) wrong dose on 4/22/26. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$154,460 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $154,460 — penalty dated 2026-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $512K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN