Benedictine Living Community Owatonna

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 74.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to observe the rights of medication administration to ensure the right medication was safely administered for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for significant medication errors. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy for R2 who required hospitalization, continous monitoring and intravenous fluid recovery to return to baseline. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 10/16/24 when licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A injected R2 with 100 units (U) of short-acting insulin instead of the prescribed Heparin (blood thinner that prevents blood clots) 5,000 milliliter (ml). The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and clinical nurse manager were notified of the IJ on 10/23/24 at 5:13 p.m. The IJ was issued as past non-compliance (PNC) when facility implemented immediate corrective action prior to survey entrance to prevent recurrence. Findings include: R2's Continuity of Care document dated 10/23/24, identified R2 had diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to safely use a mechanical lift per manufactures recommendations to transfer 1 of 1 resident (R1), who required a mechanical lift for transfers. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 fell from a full body mechanical lift causing R1 to sustain a fractured sternum and left pelvic hematoma that required a hospital admission and blood transfusion. The IJ began on 7/21/24 at 9:40 p.m., when staff failed to ensure lift sling was properly secured prior to the transfer causing R1 to fall from the mechanical lift. The administrator, regional nurse manager, and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 7/24/24 at 4:13 p.m. The IJ was removed on 7/22/24, when the facility implemented immediate corrective action before survey to prevent recurrence, therefore, the IJ was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1' had intact cognition R1 used a motorized wheelchair, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to educate on risk and prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT); failed to ensure applied compression wraps for DVT prevention were clarified upon admission for ongoing use; and failed to ensure physician orders for resumption of anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication were acted upon timely to help reduce the clotting risk for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. R1 was subsequently hospitalized and died due to severe blood clotting with an ischemic (insufficient blood flow) leg and pulmonary embolism (clot in the lung) resulting in actual harm for R1. In addition, the facility failed to ensure surgical incisions were adequately monitored by nursing staff to reduce the risk of complication (i.e., delayed response to infection) for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed who had surgical wounds. Findings include: R1: R1's Hospitalist Discharge summary, dated [DATE], identified R1 would be transitioned to the care center and listed a principal problem…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure safe transfers with a full body mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls/safety. This resulted in actual harm when R1 fell from the lift, had severe back pain, and needed to be sent to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation. The facility implemented immediate corrective action, so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance.Findings include:R1's face sheet dated 7/9/25, identified diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis that affects all or part of the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs), acquired absence of left leg above the knee, and burst fracture of the T11-T12 vertebrae (a serious spinal injury when the vertebra breaks). R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was dependent on staff for all transfers and cognitively intact. R1 had no falls since previous assessment.R1's Safe Lifting and Movement assessment dated [DATE], identified R1 had an amputation, paraplegia, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to ensure immediate care needs for surgical incision care and his urinary incontinence were addressed for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed. R2's progress note, dated 4/13/26, identified R2 admitted to the care center and had several medical conditions including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and high blood pressure. R2 needed assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs), needed cues and reminders to ask for help, and was alert and oriented to self. The note identified R2 had been incontinent of urine and was unaware of such. Further, the note included a section labeled Skin that identified, . two healing surgical sites in bilateral groin . Bruising to BUE [bilateral upper extremities] . Small scabbed area to posterior calf on LLE [left lower extremity . All areas OTA [open to air] and not draining. No redness, swelling, or warmth to peri-wounds. R2's Care Plan, dated 4/22/26, identified all the potential or actual problems R2 had,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and, if needed, develop a toileting program to promote urinary continence and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., skin infection, breakdown) for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed. On 5/12/26 at 12:35 p.m., R2's family member (FM)-D was interviewed. R2 was admitted to the care center after being hospitalized for an extended period due to multiple conditions and he had used a catheter while in the hospital, but it was removed before he discharged to the care center on 4/13/26. FM-D stated R2 was doing good with using the bathroom and able to sense the need to go when he left the hospital. R2 also had some healing surgical incisions near his groin which were all intact and open-to-air (OTA). However, then they opened while at the care center and R2 had to eventually go back to the hospital due to them being re-opened and becoming infected. FM-D stated the family had visited at times and found R2 to be incontinent of urine which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure high-risk medications were provided timely after being ordered to help prevent potential blood clots for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed. R1 had Eliquis (an anticoagulant, blood thinning, medication) ordered by the medical doctor (MD)-A on 4/10/26; however, this was not provided to R1 until 4/12/26 despite supply of the medication available in the emergency kit (E-Kit) onsite. R1's Hospitalist Discharge summary, dated [DATE], identified R1 would be transitioned to the care center and listed a principal problem, Acute cholecystitis (gallbladder inflammation). R1's other active problems included high blood pressure, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). R1 was described as a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with acute cholecystitis and underwent surgery for this condition. R1 then developed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate (RVR). The summary outlined, Eliquis on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely implement physician's order to administer an anti-nausea medication and timely follow an order for transfer to emergency department for 1 of 3 residents (R1) which resulted in delay of treatment reviewed for change of condition. Findings includeFindings include:R1's face sheet dated 3/25/26, identified diagnoses of perforation of intestine (non-traumatic) (hole or tear develops in the intestine), and colostomy status (surgical opening in colon that allows stool to exit through stoma).R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had no cognitive issues. R1 had no behaviors. R1 used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. R1 required one staff assistance with dressing, transfers, repositioning, toileting, and walking. R1 had an ostomy.During a phone interview on 3/25/26 at 8:37 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-B stated on 2/27/26, around 4:00 p.m.-4:30 p.m. she emptied R1's colostomy bag. Afterward, she walked R1 out to dinner. Five…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure there was a communication process between the long-term care (LTC) facility and the hospice provider to ensure the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for hospice services.Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 10/31/25, identified diagnoses of heart failure (a condition where the body's heart does not pump enough blood for the body's needs), atrial fibrillation(a common heart rhythm disorder), and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition defined by excessive worry and fear).R2's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R2 was dependent for all transfers, received hospice services, and was cognitively intact.R2's hospice focus care plan dated 8/14/25, identified R2 received hospice services with a goal of preferred wishes for end of life to be honored. Interventions were as follows: facility will coordinate with hospice providers and reference hospice care plan located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper food temperatures and provide attractive food in order to ensure palatability for 15 of 15 residents (R2, R25, R26, R29, R45, R52, R55, R61, R63, R64, R69, R74, R75, R78, and R90) reviewed for concerns of cold food. In addition, the facility failed to provide palatable food for 4 of 4 residents (R22, R25, R47 and R78) reviewed for dining. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate food provided by the facility. Finding include: R2's significant change in status Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment. R25's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment. R26's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated cognitively intact. R29's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated cognitively intact. R45's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], indicated cognitively intact. R52's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], indicated cognitively intact. R55's quarterly MDS dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a dignified manner for 1 of 2 residents (R24) reviewed for dignity, when the resident was left in bed, unclothed. Findings include:R24's face sheet provided on 7/24/25, included diagnoses of hemiplegia (weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke.R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R24 had moderately impaired cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R24 required partial or substantial assistance with activities of daily living and did not walk. R24's physician order dated 7/3/24, indicated to apply barrier cream to penis and scrotum daily, 6:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.R24's care plan with revised date of 7/10/25, indicated R24 needed assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing due to decline in mobility related to but not limited to hemiplegia.During an interview on 7/21/25 at 3:52 p.m., R24 stated that morning an agency nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide a method for residents and resident representatives to submit grievances anonymously. In addition the facility failed to follow their grievance process for missing/damaged personal property for 1 of 1 resident (R69) who reported a missing item. This had the potential to prevent all 72 residents in the facility.Findings include: On 7/23/25 at 11:20 a.m., during resident council R2, R25, R26, R29, R45, R52, R55, R61, R63, R64, R69, R74, R75, R78 each stated that they were unaware of any method to submit concerns anonymously and stated that no anonymous grievance process had been made known to them. On 7/23/25 at 3:00 p.m., during a facility tour, social services (SS)-A confirmed there was no grievance box or any other designated area for anonymous grievance submission accessible to residents available in resident accessible locations. Further, no signage or posted information indicated an option for submitting concerns confidentially or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident (R26) reviewed for mood and behaviors, specifically post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Findings include: R26's face sheet printed 7/24/25, indicated diagnoses of major depressive disorder and post traumatic stress disorder.R26's care plan revised 7/10/25, indicated the potential for trauma responses related to military service in Vietnam, as evidenced by anxiety around fireworks and being around other people. Interventions included ensuring clear paths to doors if resident was in a room with multiple people and honoring wishes regarding position of entry door.R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, no behaviors, and lacked a diagnosis for post traumatic stress disorder.During observation on 7/23/25 at 10:00 a.m., R26 was observed entering chapel A for a dietary meeting.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with accepted professional standards and failed to disinfect the rubber septum of an insulin pen with an alcohol wipe prior to attaching the needle and administering insulin for 1 of 1 resident (R87) observed during insulin administration. Findings include: R87's face sheet printed 7/24/25, indicated R87 was admitted on [DATE], and diagnosis included type 2 diabetes.R87's care plan dated 7/22/25, indicated alteration in nutrition/hydration related to diabetes and obesity and medications reviewed quarterly and prn (as needed). R87's medication administration history dated 7/1/25-7/24/25, indicated Novolog Flex Pen U-100 Insulin; insulin pen; per sliding scale.On 7/22/25 at 12:30 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A was observed preparing to administer a subcutaneous insulin injection to R87 using a prefilled insulin pen. LPN-A removed the pen cap and immediately attached the needle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$36,638 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $22,205 — penalty dated 2024-10-24
• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-06-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $946K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN