Sainte Anne Extended Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 87.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow a care planned intervention to prevent or reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R1 fell and sustained a right fibular fracture which required an emergency room (ER) visit. The facility implemented immediate corrective action, so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of dementia, fracture of upper and lower end of right fibula, anxiety disorder and depression. Further identified R1 required 2-person extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R1 had one fall with injury and two falls with major injury. R1's fall Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/28/24, identified R1's was at risk for falls due to R1 received physician ordered anti-depressant medications. R1 has had one fall during this assessment period. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide appropriate care in a timely manner to prevent a decline in condition for 1 of 1 residents (R32) when R32 continued to experience prolonged nausea and decline lasting more than three weeks causing harm. As a result, R32 was sent to the emergency department (ED) and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after the facility failed to ensure the provider was fully appraised of R32's signs and symptoms. Findings include: R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a right knee fracture, had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, transfers, and locomotion. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 3:59 p.m., R32 stated she had not seen a physician in person since she had started feeling sick, stating she was nauseated all the time and was not able to eat much due to her nausea. R32 stated she was able…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure once opened, a bottle of tuberculin solution (solution used in intradermal skin tests to detect tuberculosis infection) was labeled in accordance to professional standard (an opened multidose vial of tuberculin PPD must be discarded 30 days after the first puncture). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident's (R32) Lantus (insulin glargine) pen was dated once opened. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 05/18/26 at 2:09 p.m., of the fourth-floor medication refrigerator, a bottle of tuberculin solution approximately three quarters used, a light blue label on the bottle indicated, discard 30 days after opening. Close inspection of the bottle showed no open date. Licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, present during the observation confirmed, the open bottle of tuberculin solution was not dated once opened and stated, the bottle should not have been in the refrigerator. During an interview on 05/21/26 at 8:44 a.m., registered nurse, case manager (RN)-B stated, tuberculin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided or offered to promote oral hygiene and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., further breakdown, oral pain) for 1 of 1 residents (R9) reviewed for dental hygiene and services.Findings include: R9's annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified impaired cognition and required assistance with oral hygiene. In addition, R9 with diagnoses of dementia and anxiety.R9's physician orders dated 7/22/25 state, Optometry, Audiology, Psychology, Dental, and Podiatry consults to evaluate and treat as indicated.R9's care plan dated 1/14/26 identified, need assistance with dental care d/t dementia. I have an upper partial denture.R9's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence of a progress note or referral or provided a consultation for dental services.During observation and interview on 5/18/26 at 2:03 p.m., R9 was sitting in wheelchair in her room on the locked memory care unit. She had intact teeth of upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided or offered to promote oral hygiene and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., further breakdown, oral pain) for 1 of 1 residents (R29) reviewed for dental hygiene and services. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified R29 with significantly impaired cognition, and dependent on staff for all cares including oral hygiene. In addition, R29 with diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy body (dementia)fibromyalgia, and arthritis.R29's Dental Consult, dated 6/27/24 identified, Multiple broken teeth. Recommend extract any teeth that become symptomatic.R29's care plan with edit date of 4/9/2020 identified, Dental appointments per resident or resident representative preferences.During interview with R29's emergency contact (FM)-B on 5/20/26 at 12:15 p.m., FM-B stated he expected the facility to arrange for routine dental services and could not recall the last time R29 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in a unit refrigerator were labeled, dated and discarded properly. Additionally, facility failed to ensure proper food storage for 1 of 1 resident refrigerator that contained undated and unlabeled food.Findings Include:During an observation on 05/20/26 9:05 a.m., the fourth-floor kitchen refrigerator contained the following items: 3 clear sandwich size bags with egg salad sandwiches labeled with room number and undated, 1 small size of uncovered paper bowl of [NAME] tot and a taco wrapped in brown paper from taco [NAME], not labeled and undated. 3 small (2 .25 oz) plastic portion cups, black container, clear covering, holding a creamy and medium consistency substance, not labeled and undated. A medium size (16 oz) food container with a red lid, holding a mixture of ground brown meat, and a reddish liquid labeled with a room number and dated 5/14/26. During an interview on 05/20/26 9:05 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)- A,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for residents who required assistance with eating. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who were dependent on staff for their intake of nutrition. Findings include: During an observation of the main floor dining room on 2/10/25 at 5:08 p.m., nursing staff were standing while feeding residents. The staff would move from table to table to assist different residents and were found to not have engaged with the residents during the meal. During an observation on 2/11/25 at 11:55 a.m., nursing staff were standing during lunch meal and moving from resident to resident. During an observation on 2/12/25 at 12:22 p.m., the 5th floor common area was used for meals. Nursing assistant (NA-C) was assisting residents with their meals while standing. NA-C would call out, out loud asking if the residents needed any assistance. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 12:32 p.m., NA-E explained most of the residents need some sort of assistance during meals and most days…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs for 4 of 4 observed medication storage areas during a facility wide remodel. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 2/13/25 at 9:08 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B identified the current refrigerator used to store medication on the 2nd floor was locked. The locked refrigerator was not affixed to any permanent surface and was in a temporary nurse's station in the open while the facility was in the middle of a remodel. LPN-B identified the medications in the refrigerator contained flu shot, insulin pens, tuberculin, and Ativan (antianxiety). LPN-B stated the nurses are the ones who check the expiration dates and refill the refrigerator. During observation of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th floor medication storage areas, it was found each had the same type of refrigerator located in a temporary nurse's station as found on the 2nd floor. The nursing staff carry a key to the locked refrigerator which was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure compression stocking were applied as ordered to help with edema of the lower extremities for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for activity of daily living . Findings include: R10's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], included R10 cognitive status was intact and required minimal assistance with activities of daily living. R10's face sheet dated 11/17/23 included diagnoses of disorders of veins, localized edema, essential hypertension, history of acute embolism and thrombosis related to deep veins of bilateral lower extremities, cerebral infarction (stroke or bleeding in the brain), and generalized weakness. R10's medical record included, an order to apply compression stockings daily every a.m. and remove at HS (at night). During an observation on 2/10/25 at 1:15 p.m., R10 was resting in a recliner noted to have edema bilaterally to lower extremities. During an interview on 2/10/25 at 1:31 p.m., R10 said both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine grooming was completed who was dependent on staff for personal cares for 1 of 1 resident (R62), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL)'s . Findings include: R62's minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated mild cognitive impairment and was dependent on facility staff to complete personal hygiene tasks. R62's face sheet included the diagnosis of peripheral autonomic neuropathy (nerve damage), thoracic spondylosis (a condition that affects the middle part of your spine, causing pain, stiffness, and nerve compression), generalized muscle weakness, and hemiplegia ( paralysis of one side of the body) R62's care plan dated 1/24/25 indicated a self-care deficit related to personal hygiene and bathing and required substantial assistance from facility staff. During observation and interview on 2/10/25 5:08 p.m., R62 had facial hair present on the right upper lip and chin. Right upper lip contained a patch of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to replace and maintain oxygen tubing for 2 of 2 residents (R32 and R65) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated severe cognitive impairment and received supplemental oxygen. R32's order report dated 1/4/2025, indicated diagnoses of primary emphysema (chronic lung condition that causes shortness of breath), respiratory failure, and hypoxemia and R32 active orders instructed staff to deliver continuous oxygen and to titrate (continuously measure and adjust the balance) amount to maintain oxygen saturation above 88%. During an observation on 2/10/25 at 1:44 p.m., R32's oxygen tubing was dirty under the nasal area. This tubing was hooked up to a concentrator with a long extension and tied in a knot with R32's wheelchair sitting on top of the tubing. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 10:45 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN-C) explained the process for changing and maintaining oxygen tubing. The current process was a scheduled task during a nursing shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately clean resident medical equipment after use and place barrier between resident high touch surface and resident multiuse basket. This had the potential to affect all resdient's who received blood glucose monitoring. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during cares for 1 of 3 residents (R36) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: During medication administration on 2/10/25 at 3:47 p.m. registered nurse (RN)-C set up medications for R35. R35 also required to have a blood sugar checked. RN-C had a basket containing the following: lancets (device to puncture the skin for blood sample), test strips, sharps containers, cotton balls and on top was a glucometer (machine to get results of the blood sample). Once in R35's room RN-C placed the basket on a chair then moved the basket from the chair to the resident tray table with out placing a barrier between the tray table and the basket. After RN-C completed the glucose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,757 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-11-04
• $11,918 — penalty dated 2023-12-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN