St Catherines Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 44.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility reported incident (FRI) and investigation reports, record review, review of facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #19) with an allegation of abuse. Failure to identify abuse and ensure residents are free from verbal abuse and abusive gestured language, which includes disparaging and derogatory terms caused fear, anxiety, mental anguish, and psychosocial harm. During the on-site recertification survey and FRI investigation, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 11/21/24 at 8:44 a.m. and determined an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 10/21/24. The facility failed to recognize the abuse, failed to assess the resident physically and mentally, failed to notify the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team), failed to update the care plan, and failed to notify the resident's provider. * 11/21/24 at 10:10 a.m., the survey team notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) of the IJ situation, provided the IJ…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) and investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #51) who displayed physical behaviors towards another resident. Failure to protect residents from physical abuse resulted in injury and pain. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Plan occurred on 01/29/26. This policy, dated year 2017, stated, . In order to prevent abuse . the facility shall do the following . Identify, correct, and intervene in situations where abuse . occurs. Assess residents with needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict . The facility will develop an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult who receives services in the facility. The plan shall contain an individual assessment of . The resident's risk of abusing other vulnerable adults; and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policies, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and treatment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #2) with impaired skin integrity of the feet/toes. Failure to assess, monitor, and treat skin issues in a timely manner resulted in a delay of treatment and contributed to Resident #2's hospitalization for amputation of fourth and fifth toes. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Prevention and Treatment of Skin Breakdown occurred on 03/11/25. This policy, dated 09/01/18, stated, . Skin integrity is monitored and abnormal findings are documented: Skin is observed daily with cares. Review of the facility policy titled Change in Condition occurred on 03/11/25. This policy, revised 10/02/23, stated, . Update the care plan as appropriate. Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on 03/11/25. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Resident #2 tested positive for COVID (Coronavirus disease) and was placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and review of professional reference, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen for 2 of 2 kitchens (North Kitchen and South Kitchen). Failure to ensure tableware is placed on resident meal trays in a sanitary manner and ensure floors, cabinets, and the warewashing machine are free from food, dust, and mineralization debris has the potential for contamination of dishware/food and may result in foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include:The 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, Section 4-904.13, page 455, stated, The presentation or setting of . cleaned and sanitized utensils shall be done in a manner designed to prevent the contamination of food- and lip-contact surfaces. Section 6-501.17, page 476, stated, Cleanliness of the food establishment is important to minimize attractants for insects and rodents, aid in preventing the contamination of food and equipment, and prevent nuisance conditions. Observations on 01/25/26 at 12:20 p.m. showed the following:* North Kitchen: Burnt loose and baked-on debris…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #9 and #34) with a shared bathroom. Failure to maintain a clean and sanitary bathroom does not promote a homelike living environment or enhance the resident's quality of life. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Environmental Services - Cleaning occurred on 01/29/25. This policy, dated 2020, stated, . It is the policy of Benedictine communities that they be maintained in a clean and hygienic condition . Clean surfaces such as . toilet seats . according to the schedule established by EVS [environmental service] supervisor. Community trash containers should be lined .Observations of Resident #9 and #34's shared bathroom showed the following:*01/25/26 at 2:01 p.m., Bowel movement (BM) splattered throughout the inside of the toilet bowl and smeared on the back and top of the toilet seat. A trash can without a liner located beside the toilet contained several soiled wipes. Resident #34…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate medication labeling and storage for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) observed receiving insulin and 1 of 3 medication carts (cart #700). Failure to ensure proper medication labeling and storage may result in medication errors and unauthorized access to medications.Review of the facility policy titled Labeling of Medications due to order change occurred on 01/28/26. This undated policy stated, . 1. If change in medication dose pharmacy either A) sends a see mar for orders label . or B) sends new label . 2. If pharmacy does not send a see mar for order label the nursing staff are to continue to administer the correct does per the physician orders in the electronic records until pharmacy has complied.Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications occurred on 01/28/26. This policy, revised on 08/31/23, stated, . 14. Medication cart is to be locked at all times when unattended. - Observation on 01/26/26 at 9:12 a.m. showed the label on Resident #3's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #14) and one supplemental (Resident #30) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to glove use and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene occurred on 01/29/26. This policy revised September 2023, stated, . Times to Perform Hand Hygiene are, but not limited to: . Before and after direct resident contact . assisting a resident with personal cares . assisting a resident with toileting . After removing gloves . - Observation on 01/25/26 at 1:12 p.m. showed a certified nurse aide (CNA) (#3) transferred Resident #30 to the toilet using a stand lift. Without wearing gloves, the CNA (#3) removed the resident's wet brief, applied gloves without performing hand hygiene, placed a clean brief on the resident, removed her gloves and wiped her hands on her pants. Without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$56,329 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $17,215 — penalty dated 2026-01-26
• $15,548 — penalty dated 2025-03-11
• $23,566 — penalty dated 2024-11-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $570K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND