Living Community Of St Joseph

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 422 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 199 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 88.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure one of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1) received adequate assistance and supervision to prevent accidents when the facility staff transferred the resident to a standing position without a gait belt. The resident ambulated to the restroom, notified staff that he/she felt dizzy, the staff member left the resident alone to go obtain a gait belt and the reisdent fell. The resident fractured his/her left hip and required surgery. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility policy titled, Integrated Fall Management Policy, dated 8/24/17, showed: -Fall Risk assessments are to be completed quarterly and upon significant change of condition; -Identify other risk factors in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to identify additional risk factors and interventions; -Residents at risk for falls have an individualized resident centered care plan developed based upon the fall risk assessment; -Include other professionals to assess or intervene regarding fall risk prevention; -Residents are provided education, regarding her/his fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates for seven sampled residents (Residents #10, #41, #46, #50, #79, #97, #102); when the facility had an open expired insulin pen (Resident #10); when the facility had an opened multi-use medicated nasal spray and eye drops with no open dates (Resident #79 & Resident #97); when the facility had an uncapped, pre-primed insulin needle and pen with dried blood on it (Resident #41); also when the facility had an opened large, floor stock powdered fiber medication with no open date, as well as two expired floor stock oral medications (Aspirin and guaifenesin); when the facility had four vials of expired blood sugar testing solutions that expire 90 days after opening and additionally when the facility had a clear storage bag containing medications for three different residents (Residents #102, #46, & #50). This affected seven of the 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 87.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when the facility failed to ensure food items were dated with an open date or expiration date, and when the facility failed to dispose of food items that had been expired. This had to potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 87.Review of the facilities Food Storage- Perishable dated 2012, showed:-Sanitary procedures will be maintained in perishable food storage to keep foods safe, wholesome and appetizing, and to prevent contamination;-Refrigerated frozen products must be properly stored immediately upon delivery;-All prepared food stored in the refrigerator units should be in covered, seamless containers or otherwise suitably protected with used by date. Containers should be arranged so that free circulation of air was allowed at all times.-The policy did not address food labeling, dating of foods or expired foods. Observation of the walk in refrigerator on 04/06/2026 at 8:48 A.M. showed:-Open package of lettuce not sealed shut and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility staff did not utilize enhanced barrier precautions by wearing appropriate protective equipment when caring for residents with an indwelling device for three residents (Residents #10, #37 & #39) and additionally when the facility staff did not change gloves between dirty and clean tasks for one resident (Resident #39); this affected three of the 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 87.Review of the facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy showed:-EBP expands the use of protective equipment and refers to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities;-EBP will be utilized for any resident that has an infection with a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-02 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 25 sample residents (Resident (R) 54 and R23) reviewed for self-administration of medications were permitted to exercise their resident rights. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside of R54 who was not assessed to be able to self-administer medications safely; and the facility failed to ensure R23, who desired to self-administer medications and was assessed to be safe to do so was permitted to. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated 08/31/23, revealed the purpose was, To enhance resident independence to self-administer medications. The policy indicated, . Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined it is clinically appropriate and safe . The nursing associates will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse by a staff member for two of two residents (Resident (R) 26 and R32) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 25. This failure created the potential for abuse of other residents. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Plan, dated 07/21/22, revealed, Any person with the knowledge or suspicion of suspected abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and/or financial exploitation must report immediately, without fear of reprisal and/or retaliation . Any allegations involving abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and/or financial exploitation will be investigated . Measures will be taken to identify the source of the alleged abuse and prevent future incidents. Investigative packets will be utilized to systematically direct the team through the investigative process. Any evidence gathered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of 25 sampled residents (Residents (R)37 and R21) were provided with sufficient supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. R37 experienced a fall in which she fell forward out of the bed onto the floor on 09/20/24. There was a lack of interventions implemented in response to the fall and seven days later, R37 experienced another fall onto the floor. R37 sustained injuries including abrasions to her knees, a nosebleed, bleeding gums, bruise to her right cheek, and experienced hip and knee pain. R21 wandered through out the First-Floor [NAME] unit and into residents' rooms, including the rooms of R37 and R32, putting herself and other residents at risk of injuries. R21 wandered at night into residents' rooms when there was less staffing on the unit to supervise her and when she had the potential to startle residents who were sleeping. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 21) residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This had the potential to cause the resident to have unmet care needs. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of R21's Face Sheet, found under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated an admission date of 09/07/18 with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the RAI Manual, dated 10/01/19, indicated, . It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT completing the assessment. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Comprehensive Assessments and Care Planning, provided by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to have an end date for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for two of six residents (Resident (R) 16 and R282) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 25. The failure had the potential for residents to receive psychotropic medications without ongoing assessment by a physician or practitioner for continued appropriateness. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, reviewed on 09/07/23, revealed, . Psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior . PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. If the medical provider believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, the medical provider should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order . 1. Review of R16's Resident Face Sheet, located in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate and complete for one out of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 37). R37's record did not include the updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 form, and R37 was documented with a serious mental illness diagnosis of bipolar disease that was not accurate. This created the potential for R37 to experience the stigma associated with mental illness and for staff and medical providers not to have full and accurate information about R37's mental health condition. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's admission Prescreening for Individuals with Mental Retardation or Mental Illness policy, dated 2021, revealed, Missouri law mandates preadmission screening for all individuals with mental illness (MI) or mental retardation (MR) who apply to long term care facility . The policy indicated if the resident had a serious mental illness diagnosis, a referral would be made to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold residents' monies separate from facility money when they did not reimburse residents and/or their responsible parties after the residents were discharged , which affected six residents (Residents #994, #995, #996, #997, #998, and #999). The facility census was 95. Review of facility policy, Refunds - Credit Balances, dated [DATE], showed: -Purpose: To prevent fraud, waste, and abuse and manage reimbursement; -Policy: All credit balances will be reviewed within 30 days from being identified. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Title VI entitled Transparency and Program Integrity section 6402; overpayments from Federal payers must be refunded within 60 days after the date on which the overpayment was identified. Federal payers include Medicare A and B, Medicaid, Veterans Association, Medicare Advantage or any other payer under title XVIII and XIX; -Private Pay - For residents who have discharged and have a credit balance, complete…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $863K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO