No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck

1101 Black Oak Drive, New Brighton, MN 55112 · Non profit - Other · 105 certified beds · (651) 633-1686 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (651) 633-1686 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,909 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,909 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-08)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1151 Silver Lake Rd NW · (612) 706-4500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1151 Silver Lake Rd · (651) 746-2580 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2600 Rice Creek Rd · (651) 636-2277 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1150 27th Ave NW · (651) 638-2100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2722 I-694 Service Rd · (763) 843-4588

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.7%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.4%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.5%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.5%4.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.0%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.3%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.6%24.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.1%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%82.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%23.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%14.8%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.73U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.7%CMS range 46.0–58.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 7.1–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 5.0–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.18
RN hoursweekends
24.0%
Total nursing turnover
8.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 90.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.94 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to provide a resident nothing by mouth for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for diet orders. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when he was provided with a pastry, orange juice and coffee by staff, and later became hypoxic and was sent to the hospital. The facility implemented corrective action prior to the investigation so the deficiency was issued at Past Noncompliance. The IJ began on 11/4/24 at 8:45 a.m. when nursing assistant (NA)-A provided R1 with a pastry, orange juice and coffee. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 11/8/24 at 2:48 p.m. The facility implemented corrective action on 11/5/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 11/1/24 indicated R1's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure and pneumonitis (inflammation of the lung tissue). R1's care plan dated 11/2/24 indicated R1 was at risk for aspiration (when something swallowed enters the airway or lungs),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and documentation review the facility failed to notify the medical provider of a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed when R1 reported to the nurse she was not eating or drinking because it hurts my intestine and rectum, and she had loose stools, staff notified the provider three days later. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had no cognitive impairment, behaviors, or rejection of care. She used a walker independently and continent of bowel and urine. She did not have a risk for skin impairment or wounds. Her care areas triggered activities of daily living (ADLSs), and nutrition. R1's care plan dated 6/2/26, indicated she had pain from her left knee, decreased strength, needed staff to help with daily hygiene, and a fall risk. She was continent of bowel and bladder. RN-A's nursing progress note dated 6/14/26 at 11:08 p.m., indicated R1 told her she had loose stool since Friday (3 days earlier.) She did not tell nursing staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for 1 of 1 resident (R61). Findings include:R61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of dementia and encephalopathy (disease of the brain that causes altered brain function or structure, often resulting in cognitive, behavioral, or neurological impairments). It further indicated R61 required substantial assistance with dressing.During observation on 4/15/26 at 7:11 a.m., R61 was sitting in the dining room at a table with 3 other residents. He was wearing a shirt and hip protectors (nude colored compression type shorts with padding on the hips). During observation and interview on 4/15/26 at 7:28 a.m., trained medication assistant (TMA)-A verified R61 was sitting in the dining room wearing a shirt and hip protectors stating the residents don't normally sit in the dining room just wearing their hip protectors because they are meant to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wishes for resuscitation were accurately documented in all areas of the medical record for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for inconsistent advanced directives. Findings include:R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R10 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial to maximal assistance for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and was receiving hospice care. R10's diagnoses included dementia, adult failure to thrive, and encounter for palliative care. R10's care plan dated [DATE], indicated, My code status will be honored.See M.D. order. R10's care plan further indicated resident received hospice services and that Resident's preferred wishes for end of life will be honored. R10's care plan instructed staff to coordinate with hospice providers and to refer to her hospice care plan. R10's admission clinical documentation assessments dated [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE], identified R10's advance care planning included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R47) who required alternate means of communication due to English as a second language.Findings include:R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R47 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnosed with aphasia (difficulty with communication) and dementia. Additionally, diagnosed with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cardiovascular accident affecting right dominate side, had reduced mobility. R47 required set-up help with eating, supervision for hygiene needs and impairment on one side, need assistance with dressing, and required moderate assistance for bed mobility. The MDS indicated R47 minimal difficulty with hearing, and was Vietnamese.R47's care plan dated 3/11/26, indicated R47 had behavioral symptoms with placing self on the floor, non-compliant with medication administration related to possible cognitive deficits. the care plan indicated R47 preferred to speak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was removed for 1 of 1 resident (R3) who required assistance with hygiene and was reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL).Findings Include:R3's comprehensive Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had severe cognitive. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke) aphasia (difficulty communicating) and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness/paralysis) of the left side. The MDS indicated R3 required maximal assistance with upper and lower body, and dependent on staff for all personal hygiene.R3's care plan revised on 2/5/26, identified ADL self- care deficient related to cerebral infarction. Interventions included maximal staff assistance with dressing, bathing and personal hygiene. The care plan directed that R3's facial hair was to be shaved daily. R3 had a personal electric shaver available. R3's medical record lacked R3 had refused to be shaved. During an interview on 4/14/26 at 9:05 a.m., family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care through on going communication with hospice services for 1 of 1 residents (R10) reviewed for hospice had discrepancy in code status documentation identified and not resolved timely. Findings include:R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R10 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial to maximal assistance for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and was receiving hospice care. R10's diagnoses included dementia, adult failure to thrive, and encounter for palliative care. R10's care plan dated [DATE], indicated, My code status will be honored.See M.D. order. R10's care plan further indicated resident received hospice services and that Resident's preferred wishes for end of life will be honored. R10's care plan instructed staff to coordinate with hospice providers and to refer to her hospice care plan. R10's admission clinical documentation assessments dated [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE], identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow up on a 1 of 1 resident (R45) who glasses were broken. Findings include: R45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of dementia (syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities), and Type II diabetes, and Parkinson's disease (progressive neurological disorder that primarily affects movement). It further indicated he was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADL). R45's eye consult dated 6/3/25, indicated R45 should continue with the same eyeglasses and encourage full time use for distance and reading. R45's medical record lacked documentation regarding R45 glasses being broken or what was being done about it. During observation and interview on 4/13/26 at 1:57 p.m., R45 was in his room, sitting in his wheelchair. He stated he turned in his glasses because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 1 of 2 residents (R10) reviewed for falls. Findings include:R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R10 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial to maximal assistance for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility. The MDS further indicated that R10 had two or more falls without injury and one fall with injury since admission. The MDS indicated R10 did not exhibit rejection of care behavior. R10's diagnoses included dementia and history of fracture of right leg. R10's care plan dated 1/28/26, indicated R10 had self-care deficit in mobility and was at risk for falls. R10's care plan identified interventions included hip protectors on at all times to prevent further injuries, floor mat beside the bed, and call light in reach at all times when in room. During observation on 4/16/26 at 8:13 a.m., R10 was asleep in bed asleep. The bed was in a low position. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered and maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R49, R9) reviewed for respiratory therapy.Findings include:R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (serious condition where the lungs cannot adequately supply oxygen to the blood, leading to low oxygen levels (hypoxemia) and potentially life-threatening complications), shortness of breath, and congestive heart failure (chronic condition where the heart is unable to pump blood effectively, leading to fluid buildup in the lungs and other body parts). R49's physician's orders dated 2/24/25, indicated continuous oxygen wean as able per nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 90%. Current oxygen flow rate 2 liters per minute (LPM) every shift. R49's care plan dated 6/24/2024, indicated an alteration in respiratory status related to (pneumonia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medication orders were transcribed correctly (according to the physician orders) for 1 of 1 resident (R9) who was prescribed an antibiotic.Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition and diagnosis of Prurigo nodularis (chronic skin condition characterized by intensely itchy, firm, raised nodules that often result from persistent scratching. R9's after visit summary dated 3/31/26, indicated a new order for Doxycycline 100 milligram (mg) capsule (antibiotic). Take 1 capsule (100 mg) by mouth two times daily for 10 days with meals. R9's physician's orders indicated to monitor adverse reaction to antibiotic every shift from 3/31/26-5/10/26.R9's care plan dated 4/15/26, indicated R45 was taking an antibiotic known as Doxycycline for Prurigo nodularis with an intervention to receive the antibiotic as ordered by the physician. R9's progress note dated 3/31/26, indicated R9 returned from a scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure medication was discontinued according to physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident (R9) receiving an antibiotic. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring was in place for 1 of 1 resident (R35) receiving an anticoagulant (blood thinner). Findings include: R9R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition and diagnosis of Prurigo nodularis (chronic skin condition characterized by intensely itchy, firm, raised nodules that often result from persistent scratching. R9's after visit summary dated 3/31/26, indicated a new order for Doxycycline 100 milligram (mg) capsule. Take 1 capsule (100 mg) by mouth two times daily for 10 days with meals. R9's physician's orders indicated to monitor adverse reaction to antibiotic every shift from 3/31/26-5/10/26. R9's care plan dated 4/15/26, indicated R45 was taking an antibiotic known as Doxycycline for Prurigo nodularis with an intervention to receive the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to update the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for communication.Findings include:R1' s undated face sheet, indicated R1 was Vietnamese, admitted on [DATE], was moderately cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: intercranial hemorrhage, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (loss of use of one side of the body), chronic kidney disease, hypertension, aphagia and pain. R1's social services assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1's preferred language was Vietnamese.R1's Care plan reviewed on 2/3/25, lacked identification of or interventions related to language or communication needs.On 2/3/26 at 3:25p.m., upon entering the room R1 immediately requested to have an interpreter because they could not understand writer. Via translation, R1 stated they felt like the facility did not care for them. R1 did not understand what was happening with their care, or to them. They stated they did not know how to communicate with the facility staff which was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices for 2 of 2 residents (R62, R59) observed during personal cares. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate room assignment for 6 of 10 residents (R26,R23,R136,R74,R12,R11) reviewed for transmission based precautions (TBP). Also, the facility failed to ensure consistent and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) use for 5 of 10 residents (R11,R12,R73,R76, R59) reviewed for TBP and staff handling soiled laundry. Findings include: Room Assignment From CDC website: https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/faqs.html Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes | LTCFs | CDC Contact Precautions require the use of gown and gloves on every entry into a resident's room, regardless of the level of care being provided to the resident. The resident is given dedicated equipment (e.g., stethoscope and blood pressure cuff) and is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain dignity for 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed for dignity. R62's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of quadriplegia, traumatic rupture of cervical intervertebral disc (C5-6), spinal stenosis, and neurogenic bladder. It further indicated R62 required substantial assistance with toileting, was always incontinent of urine, and received a diuretic on routine basis. R62's care plan dated 4/25/25, indicated the potential for alteration of bowel and bladder related to a diagnosis of a neurogenic bladder and included an intervention of R62 requiring 2 person assistance to use the toilet upon rising in the morning, before and after each meal, bedtime, on night rounds, and as needed. R62 also required assistance with all toileting tasks and used brief/pads for incontinence protection indicating he was not able to reliably notify staff of his need to be toileted. During interview on 5/12/25 at 5:25 p.m. R62…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure personal privacy during activities of daily living (ADLs) was provided for 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for privacy. Findings include: R9's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, did not reject cares, used a wheelchair, and required substantial assist with toileting hygiene, and partial to moderate assist with dressing. R9's optional state assessment (OSA) dated 4/11/25, indicated R9 required assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R9's Facesheet undated, indicated the following diagnoses: rheumatoid arthritis, Myelodysplastic syndrome, weakness, history of falling, and Alzheimer's disease. R9's care plan dated 4/14/25, indicated R9 had an alteration in ADLs and required assist of one with dressing, and grooming. R9's care plan dated 4/14/25, indicated R9 had an alteration in mobility and required assist of one with transfers and ambulating. R9's care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident specific target behavior monitoring for antipsychotic use and further failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (R9) for antipsychotic use. Findings include: R9's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 did not take an antipsychotic. R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R9 routinely took an antipsychotic and a GDR had not been attempted and the physician had not documented a GDR was clinically contraindicated. Further, did not have physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms, did not reject care, and did not wander. R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R9 routinely took an antipsychotic and a gradual dose reduction (GDR) had not been attempted. Further, the MDS indicated a GDR (gradual dose reduction) had not been documented by a physician as clinically contraindicated. Further, R9 did not have physical, verbal, or other behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R62's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of quadriplegia, traumatic rupture of cervical intervertebral disc (C5-6), spinal stenosis, and neurogenic bladder. It further indicated R62 required substantial assistance with toileting, was always incontinent of urine, and received a diuretic on routine basis. R62's care plan dated 4/25/25, indicated the potential for alteration of bowel and bladder related to a diagnosis of a neurogenic bladder and included an intervention of R62 requiring 2-person assistance to use the toilet upon rising in the morning, before and after each meal, bedtime, on night rounds, and as needed. R62 also required assistance with all toileting tasks and used brief/pads for incontinence protection indicating he was not able to reliably notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Feeding Tube R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R37 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), and required a FT for nutrition. R37's diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and nutritional deficiency, R37's care plan dated 5/13/24, indicated R37 had swallowing difficulty related to severe esophageal dysphagia and required nutrition provided using a feeding tube through a G-tube. R37's care plan instructed staff to check residual every four hours, flush G-tube with water before and after medications, maintain FT materials, not allow formula to hang longer than eight hours at room temperature, and change set up daily. R37's provider orders included the following: -Diet: NPO (nothing by mouth) except small sips of water-4/17/25 -Diet: tube feeding 45cc per hour for 22 hours Novasource renal-5/13/25 -Ensure formula bag for enteral feed has time and date on bag. Discard formula and replace every 24 hours-10/29/22 -Hold tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R9's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, did not reject cares, used a wheelchair, and required substantial assist with toileting hygiene, and partial to moderate assist with dressing. Further, R9's vision was adequate with glasses. R9's care area assessment (CAA) dated 4/14/25, indicated R9 triggered for falls due to needing assist with cares, mobility, toileting due to multiple diagnoses and received Seroquel for psychotic disorder with delusions, and Zoloft for depression. R9's optional state assessment (OSA) dated 4/11/25, indicated R9 required assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R9's Facesheet undated, indicated the following diagnoses: rheumatoid arthritis, Myelodysplastic syndrome, weakness, history of falling, and Alzheimer's disease. R9's Active Orders form indicated the following orders: • 3/20/24, Seroquel (an antipsychotic) 25 milligram (MG) tablet orally daily at 4:00 p.m. • 1/2/25, hip protector on at all times every shift. •…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow up on reported grievances in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: See also F689 related to falls. R9's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, did not reject cares, used a wheelchair, and required substantial assist with toileting hygiene, and partial to moderate assist with dressing. Further, R9's vision was adequate with glasses. R9's optional state assessment (OSA) dated 4/11/25, indicated R9 required assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R9's Facesheet undated, indicated the following diagnoses: rheumatoid arthritis, Myelodysplastic syndrome, weakness, history of falling, and Alzheimer's disease. R9's care plan dated 4/14/25, indicated R9 had an alteration in ADLs and required assist of one with dressing, and grooming. R9's care plan dated 4/14/25, indicated R9 had an alteration in mobility and required assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the daily cleaning schedule was followed in the kitchen. During observation on 5/12/25 at 12:05 p.m., the kitchen floor was visibly soiled with dirt, there were multiple footprints, food spills, it was sticky, and there were copious amounts of food particles pushed down into the grout of the floor. During observation and interview on 5/14/25 at 10:37 a.m., the kitchen floor was visibly soiled with dirt, there were multiple footprints, food spills, it was sticky, and there were copious amounts of food particles pushed down into the grout of the floor. The director of dining services (DDS) verified the floor was dirty and stated kitchen staff were responsible for mopping the floor daily. During interview on 5/14/25 at 11:04 a.m., dietary aide (DA)-A stated the dishwasher was responsible for mopping the kitchen floor every day and verified the floor was dirty stating It had been a while since it had been cleaned. During interview on 5/15/25 at 10:47 a.m., the administrator stated the kitchen staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated and disposed after expiration date. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the use of hair restraints. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Food Storage: During the initial kitchen observation on 8/12/24 at 12:06 p.m., the refrigerator contained the following: • a gallon of 1% milk with a best by date of 8/11/24 and the dietician stated needed to be thrown out. Hair Restraints: During interview and observation on 8/12/24 at 12:23 p.m., cook (C)-A had uncovered facial hair and was preparing food in the Robot Coupe food processor and was observed not wearing a beard guard/restraint or net. At 12:25 p.m., the dietician verified C-A was not wearing a beard net and stated he should have one on and stated she would have to look at the policy. Kitchenettes: During the observation of the Villa kitchenette on 8/12/24 at 12:29 p.m., contained the following: • 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure vitals signs were taken as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R77) reviewed for antipsychotic medication use and the facility failed to ensure resident's weights were monitored as ordered for 1 of 1 residents (R82) reviewed for nutrition. In addition, the facility failed to monitor skin alterations for 1 of 1 resident (R4) with facial bruising and failed to administer medications per doctor's order for 1 of 1 resident (R65) who repeatedly did not receive scheduled medications due to sleeping. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were accurately documented for 3 of 3 residents (R90, R36, R88) reviewed for non-pressure skin altercations. Findings include: R77 R77's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R77 had severe cognitive impairment and received antipsychotic medications. R77's diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, edema, vertigo, and asthma. R77 required substantial to full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure behaviors of potential wandering were comprehensively assessed for 3 of 3 residents (R15, R4, R21) and failed to assess for resident safety in the community for 1 of 1 resident (R15). The facility further failed to implement care planned interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R77) who wanders. Findings include: R15's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R15's preferred language was Hmong, did not need an interpreter, had difficulty hearing in some environments such as when speaking softly or a noisy setting and required a hearing device, a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) should have been conducted, however was not conducted, did not have hallucinations or delusions, did not exhibit wandering behavior, and did not reject care. Additionally, R15 used a cane, required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering, upper and lower body dressing, hygiene, and donning/doffing footwear. R15 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (measures intended to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms ) were implemented for 2 of 3 residents (R83 and R24) observed for enhanced barrier precautions, and failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene during assist with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 2 resident (R24). Last, the facility failed to ensure ice packs were stored separately from food storage in two unit refrigerators. This had the potential to impact the residents who resided on those units. Findings include: R83's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the use of an indwelling catheter (a thin, hollow tube that is inserted into the bladder through the urethra to collect and drain urine. R83's medical diagnosis form in the electronic medical record dated 7/16/2024 indicated the following diagnosis: Encounter for palliative care (comfort cares), acute cystitis with hematuria (a medical condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the dining room floor for 1 of 3 dining rooms was clean and sanitary. Findings include: During observation on 8/12/24 at 12:17 p.m., the dining room floor of the Villa unit had copious amounts of dried food and spilled liquids and was very sticky upon walking on it. During observation on 8/12/24 at 1:30 p.m., all the residents in the Villa unit were in the dining room waiting to go to McDonalds for lunch and the floor was observed to be visibly soiled and sticky. During interview on 8/13/24 at 7:49 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A verified the dining room floor (Villa unit) was visibly soiled, had many areas of dried food/liquid spills, and was sticky. LPN-A stated housekeeping came every morning at 8:00 a.m. and mopped the floor. -At 9:37 a.m. environmental services (ES)-A finished mopping the dining room floor, put out wet floor signs, and left the unit. Surveyor observed numerous sticky spots and spills of juice that still remained on the floor. During observation and interview on 8/13/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and individualized care plan was developed for 1 of 3 residents (R88) reviewed for psychotropic medication use. Findings include: R88's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R88 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition), delirium related to known physiological condition (a temporary mental state characterized by confusion, incoherent speech, and hallucinations), and age-related cognitive decline. Furthermore, R88's MDS indicated R88 had received an antipsychotic medication. R88's care plan revised on 8/12/24 at 3:45 p.m., (after the start of survey) indicated R88 used quetiapine for delirium. Interventions included to administer medication as ordered, ask for a possible dose reduction every three months, and monitor for side effects. Interventions further included monitoring behaviors every shift and document. R88's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine showers for 1 of 1 residents (R90) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: R90's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R90 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of cellulites (skin infection) of right lower limb, lymphedema (swelling from due to lymphatic system problem), and fracture of right foot 5th toe. R90's admission MDS further indicated R90 did not reject cares, required substantial assistance for lower body dressing, supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene, and had not been assess for bathing showering assistance due to medical/safety concerns. R90's care plan dated 7/28/24, indicated R90 had difficulty with bathing related to decline in mobility, lymphedema, and leg wounds. Interventions included staff assist with bathing weekly. R90's nursing care sheet no date, provided at survey exit indicated R90's bath day was on Monday. R90's nursing order dated 7/25/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to implement a walking program as written to prevent potential decrease in mobility for 1 of 1 resident (R73) reviewed for walking programs. Findings include: R73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified she had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, and no behaviors or rejection of care. R73 had no hearing difficulty in normal conversation, had clear speech, responded adequately to simple, direct communication only, and may miss some part of a message but comprehended most conversation. Functional physical impairments of upper and lower extremities were present, a wheelchair was normally used, and a cane was not identified as having been used. R73's walking ability was left blank, however she required partial to moderate assistance for chair to bed transfers, sit to stand and sit to laying down and was independent with wheelchair mobility. Diagnoses included stroke and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess past trauma and implement individualized care plan interventions utilizing a trauma-informed approach for 1 of 1 (R47) resident reviewed who had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, and was dependent on staff for eating, lower body dressing, and toileting assistance. Required substantial to maximal assistance with shower, bathing, and upper body dressing. Diagnoses included depression and bipolar disorder. R47's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA) worksheet dated 1/16/24, identified psychosocial well-being triggered due to six or more activities flagged as not important at all. R47 was admitted to skilled nursing facility with bipolar disorder and had a diagnosis of depression so changes in mood was expected. R47's trauma screening dated 1/20/22, identified she had been through life threatening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure assistance to a family member with determining mental capacity for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for social services. Findings include: R15's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R15's preferred language was Hmong, did not need an interpreter, had difficulty hearing in some environments such as when speaking softly or a noisy setting and required a hearing device, a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) should have been conducted, however was not conducted, did not have hallucinations or delusions, did not exhibit wandering behavior, and did not reject care. Additionally, R15 used a cane, required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering, upper and lower body dressing, hygiene, and donning/doffing footwear. R15 required partial to moderate assist with sitting to standing safely and required supervision or touching assistance to ambulate 10 feet. R15 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had an anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the provider's response to the initial medication review was followed and failed to ensure monitoring was in place for 1 of 3 residents (R88) reviewed for antipsychotic medication use. Findings include: R88's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R88 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition), delirium related to known physiological condition (a temporary mental state characterized by confusion, incoherent speech, and hallucinations), and age-related cognitive decline. Furthermore, R88's MDS indicated R88 had received an antipsychotic medication. R88's interim medication regimen review dated 7/20/24, indicated a pharmacist recommendation to the physician was sent. The recommendation stated R88 was taking the antipsychotic medication quetiapine for delirium however lacked an allowable diagnosis to support use. The recommendation included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R88) who received antipsychotic medications had an appropriate indication and diagnoses for the medication. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure staff were monitoring resident behaviors related to the antipsychotic medication and utilizing non-pharmacological approaches to ensure the antipsychotic medication was necessary. Findings include: R88's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R88 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of sepsis, metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition), delirium related to known physiological condition (a temporary mental state characterized by confusion, incoherent speech, and hallucinations), and age-related cognitive decline. Furthermore, R88's MDS indicated R88 had received an antipsychotic medication. R88's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated recommendations for the outpatient provider. The recommendation was to consider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to prevent worsening of existing pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed with a pressure ulcer. Findings include: R4's Resident Face Sheet indicated admission to facility on 8/3/23. The face sheet indicated diagnosis that included dementia, anxiety, muscle weakness and a stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) pressure ulcer. R4's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated he displayed no behaviors. The MDS indicated R4 was dependent on staff for putting on and taking off footwear and identified an unstageable (a full thickness tissue loss where the depth of the wound or bed sore is completely obscured by eschar [dead tissue] in the wound bed) pressure ulcer. R4's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed demonstrate root cause analysis, failed to perform ongoing analysis and failed to implement individualized interventions to reduce the risk for falls for 1 of 3 resident (R5) who sustained multiple falls since admission to the facility. Findings include: R5's Resident Face Sheet indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included failure to thrive, weakness, cognitive deficits and a history of falls. R5's Observation Detail List Report dated 3/13/24, indicated she was alert and oriented, had adequate vision and required the use of assistive devices, impaired mobility and/or assist with toileting. Medication use included antihypertensives. History of falls in the last three months indicated none. Fall risk score was seven which indicated R5 was not at risk for falls. Observation Detail List Report dated 3/30/24, indicated R5 sustained one to two falls in the past three months and indicated a score of 9 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: R2's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment and R2 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene (helper does less than half the effort). R2's Diagnosis List printed 3/11/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia and muscle weakness. R2's Provider Order dated 1/26/24, directed staff to provide R2 with feeding assistance for meals three times daily. R2's care plan dated 10/10/23, indicated R2 required assistance with grooming and bathing. On 3/8/23 at 1:03 p.m., R2 was observed in his wheelchair in the dining room. R2's clothes were soiled with white substance splattered on his pajama pants, and food stains on his shirt. R2's fingernails were also observed to be dirty, with brown substance under them. On 3/8/24 at 2:19 p.m.,family member (FM)-A stated R2 would not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan that included interventions to assist with eating for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: R2's significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R2 had severe cognitive impairment. R2's Provider Order dated 1/26/24 directed R2 to receive feeding assistance for meals. R2's care plan dated 10/10/23 indicated R2 had inadequate oral intake related to a history of poor appetite and impaired cognition, and R2 required assistance for meal with supervision and encouragement. On 3/8/24 at 4:12 p.m., R2 was observed in the dining room. At the table there was milk, water, an empty jello bowl (which R2 had consumed) and a plate that contained corn, fish, and potatoes. A nursing assistant opened R2's tartar sauce and buttered the bun on his plate. R2 attempted to eat one bite of corn and it dropped down the front of himself. R2 ate his bun, drank his water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide quarterly interdisciplinary team (IDT) care conferences for 1 of 5 residents (R6) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. Findings include: R6's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R6 had severe cognitive impairment. R6's medical record indicated quarterly care conferences were held on 3/23/23 and 6/22/23. No care conferences had been held since that time. On 3/11/23 at 2:29 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-C stated the facility typically performed a care conference for each resident the first week after admission, quarterly, and as needs arose. RN-C acknowledged R6 missed several care conferences. On 3/11/24 at 3:24 p.m., the social worker (SW)-A stated, We have recently had some changes, and one employee didn't work out, partly because she wasn't having and documenting care conferences. SW-A further acknowledged there were no notes for R6's care conferences after 6/22/23, and no care conferences were scheduled for R6. SW-A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nail care and feeding assistance was provided for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: R2's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision for eating, and moderate assistance with personal hygiene. R2's Provider Order dated 1/26/24, directed staff to provide feeding assistance for meals three times daily. R2's Provider Order dated 1/19/24, directed R2's bath day was Friday, and Licensed nurse to complete body audit on resident bath day and document nail[s] in task. R2's care plan dated 10/10/23, indicated R2 required assistance for meal with supervision and encouragement. On 3/8/24 at 1:05 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated R2 used to eat independently but now required assistance. RN-A stated, We encourage [R2] and sometimes have to just get [R2] get started [to eat.]. [R2] doesn't have the appetite he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed follow safeguards in place to ensure residents received the correct medications for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for medication error. Findings include: R4's Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R4 was cognitively intact. R4's Diagnoses List printed 3/11/24, indicated R4 had a diagnosis of glaucoma in both eyes. R4's Provider Orders dated 8/29/23, indicated brimonidine drops (used to lower pressure in the eyes related to glaucoma), 0.2%, administer one drop in each eye twice daily. R4's care plan printed dated 8/30/23, indicated administer medications per doctor's order. On 3/11/24 at 10:22 a.m., R4 stated on 9/7/23, she administered her own eye drops that were left on her tray table by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A. R4 stated she then discovered they were for someone else. R4 stated the nurse notified the provider, and R4's own eye drops were held for one dose as a result. R4 denied any ill effects from using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,909 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,909 — penalty dated 2024-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HEWITT, REIDIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/30/2017
BENSON, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/06/2014
HACK, TAYLARIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2022
PEARSON, LYNETTEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2021
BERGIEN, TRICIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/16/2016
HOEL, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2005
RYMANOWSKI, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2008
BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEMOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/18/1999

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 10%Other / private 45%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$459per resident / day
operating cost
$13,950per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$470per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245310. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next