Benedictine Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 233 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 91.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure infection control interventions were implemented during an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID), according to nationally recognized standards of practice such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, including contact tracing and testing of staff and residents per guidelines. In addition, the facility staff failed to utilize proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while caring for COVID-positive residents and ensure that equipment was properly sanitized following use in a COVID-positive resident room. The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ), when 19 of 96 residents (R72, R94, R65, R84, R31, R20, R41, R61, R69, R81, R13, R106, R109, R39, R64, R90, R29, R51, R110) tested positive for COVID, three of the COVID positive residents were subsequently hospitalized (R69, R72, R94) and 11 facility staff tested positive. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident catheter bag was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R1) was free from sexual abuse when nursing assistant (NA)-A entered R1's room with his genitals exposed to R1 and proceeded to hold R1's hand while holding his genitals in his other hand. This had the potential to result in serious psychosocial harm for R1.The IJ began on 10/22/25, at approximately 5:00 a.m., when NA-A entered R1's room and sexually abused R1. NA-A exposed his genitals to R1 through his unzipped pants and held R1's hand with one hand while holding his genitals in his other hand. The administrator and the director of nursing (DON) were informed of the IJ on 10/29/25, at 3:36 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action to prevent recurrence by 10/22/25, therefore, F600 is being issued at past non-compliance. Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness of one side of the body), dysphagia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the medical provider was updated in a timely manner about worsening edema which needed additional nursing interventions to manage for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed who had heart failure. R1 developed edema in their legs which caused the nurses to place Tubigrips (a compression-style device) on them, however, the medical provider was not immediately updated about this.Findings include: R1's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], identified R1 had been treated for an acute condition of acute blood loss anemia, along with multiple other medical conditions including high blood pressure, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and diabetes mellitus. R1 was discharged with a Foley catheter in place to the care center for short-term rehabilitation. R1's medications were listed which identified he consumed torsemide (a diuretic medication) 20 milligrams (mg) twice daily. R1's next appointment was scheduled for 5/8/26 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the proper labeling of medications and the removal of expired medications and supplies occurred in two of two medication rooms and 3 of 6 medication carts. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents who received supplies and medications from reviewed medication rooms and carts.Findings include:During a medication pass observation on 12/17/25 at 7:36 a.m., trained medication administrator (TMA-B) pulled medications for administration to R21. Medications included Mucinex. TMA-B reviewed the Mucinex box they had pulled for administration and confirmed the Mucinex had expired. TMA-A stated the medication should have been pulled from the cart when it expired. TMA-A removed the box and then administered R21 Mucinex from a non-expired medication card.The third-floor medication cart identified as norther lights cart was reviewed on 12/17/2025 at 9:32 a.m., with licensed practical nurse (LPN-B). LPN-B confirmed the following findings: Drawer one contained an insulin syringe which had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience was provided for 1 of 11 residents (R16) observed during dining while staff stood next to them while assisting them with eating.Findings include:R16's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R16 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and diabetes mellitus. R16's MDS identified R16 was generally understood and could understand and was severely cognitively impaired.R16's group sheet no date, identified R16 required set up with cues and encouragement for meals and hydration.During an observation on 12/17/25 at 11:24 a.m., in the safe harbor dining room, there were 11 residents seated at four different tables.At 12:28 p.m., the covered food cart arrived on the unit and the meals were delivered to the seated residents.At 12:37 p.m., trained medication aide (TMA)-A was observed standing next to R16 and assisting her with eating.During an interview on 12/17/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident choice to refuse when medication was hidden in food for 1 of 5 (R46) residents reviewed for resident rights. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (R34) with a vision deficit was assisted in selecting menu choices when they were unable to do so independently. Findings include: R46: R46's Resident Face Sheet printed 12/19/25, indicated R46 was his own responsible party. R46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R46 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia, encephalopathy, and epilepsy. R46's care plan dated 7/23/25, identified R46 was non-complaint and refused medications at times. Interventions included accept resident right to refuse and show respect for resident decisions and to notify provider and hospice if medications refused. R46's care plan dated 6/26/25, indicated psychotropic medication was used and to administer per provider orders. R46's Hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate privacy was in place prior to and after 1 of 1 resident (R75) had requested privacy measures be implemented for privacy during toileting and self-cares performed in bed.Findings include: R75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R75 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and constipation.R75's Care plan last updated 11/18/25, included interventions for bowel toileting program and resident self-performed intermittent catheterization. R75's care plan did not address R75's 's privacy needs during self-care activities and/or bed pan use.R75's Physician Order Report: 1/1/22 to 12/19/25, included the following orders:Resident is okay to perform self-catheterization for neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder.It is okay to leave medications at bedside for R to self-administer.Fleets enema once daily as needed rectal route for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of chemical restraints and utilized/documented nonpharmacological interventions prior to administering as needed psychotropic medications. The facility also failed to have a stop date for as needed psychotropic medications that were past 14 days and did not have a stop date documented. This effected 2 of 6 (R46, R69) residents looked at for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: R46: R46's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R46 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia, encephalopathy, and epilepsy. R46's care plan dated 12/8/25, indicated a psychosocial well-being concern related to potential for trauma related to my past military service and may become agitated or aggressive. Interventions included send to emergency room, notify hospice, analyze key times, places, circumstances, triggers and what de-escalates triggers. A care plan dated 6/26/25 indicated the use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0659 — isolated
  Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility staff failed to have qualified staff administer medications to a resident. This effected 1 of 1 (R46) resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R46's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R46 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia, encephalopathy, and epilepsy.R46's care plan dated 6/26/25, indicated R46 received high risk medications. Interventions included administer medications per MD order and observe for side effects of medications.During observations on 12/18/25 at 9:36 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-D was observed crushing R46's medications and mixed them in a bowl of hot cereal. RN-D was then placed the bowl of hot cereal, with medications mixed in it, back on the food cart with the other resident meal trays. During observations on 12/18/25 at 9:48 a.m., the registered dietician (RD) was observed delivering R46's tray to the room and placed on the bedside table. R46's was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure morning cares including oral cares were completed for 1 of 3 residents (R62) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), and who were dependent on staff for assistance with ADL cares.Findings include:R62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R62 had Alzheimer's disease and dementia. In addition, R62's MDS identified she required partial to moderate assistance with ADL cares.R62's group sheet undated, identified R62 required substantial assistance of one for dressing and substantial assistance of one for oral hygiene.R62's care plan dated 8/29/25, identified a self-deficit with bathing, grooming, and oral cares. Interventions included extensive assist of one to assist with bathing. The care plan did not address oral care.During a continuous observation on 12/17/25 starting at 7:41 a.m., and ending at 10:55 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-F assisted R62 with clothing choices, put Tubigrips (a brand of elastic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a locked door on the secure memory care unit had a functioning alarm to prevent residents at risk for elopement from leaving unobserved. This affected 1 of 2 residents (R100) reviewed for elopement risk. Findings include:R100's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R100 had diagnoses which included macular degeneration (an age-related eye disease that damages the macula, causing loss of sharp, central vision needed for reading and driving), hearing loss, and cognitive communication deficit. In addition, R100's MDS identified he was severely cognitively impaired, had behaviors, and wandered. R100's MDS identified a wanderguard was in use daily.R100's care plan dated 12/12/25, identified R100 had cognitive loss with exit seeking behavior. Interventions included to distract with activities and a secure memory care unit with specialized programming. R100's care plan also included behavioral symptoms, wandering towards…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) immediately, but not later than two hours, for 1 of 4 (R1) residents reviewed for resident safety. Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 12:30 p.m. a facility reported incident (FRI) submitted to the SA by the facility administrator indicated on 5/11/25, at 4:00 a.m. R1 had a new bruise to her right under arm. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) of her right dominant side, and impaired cognition following cerebral infarction (stroke). The MDS indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance by staff for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further indicated R1 was taking anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications (both medications prevent blood from clotting). R1's care plan dated 5/8/25 directed two staff to assist with transfers, using a mechanical lift. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN