Nazareth Living Center
#2 Nazareth Lane, Saint Louis, MO 63129 · Non profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (314) 487-3950 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $11,928 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-26)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 38.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 46.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.4% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.6% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 63.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.1% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.6% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 249 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.6%CMS range 51.1–64.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.2%CMS range 10.5–18.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.4–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 92.7 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #4) received treatment and care in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when the facility failed to follow physician orders for a Prevena (wound vac, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system used to manage closed surgical incisions) and the resident's wound dehisced (separation of the edges of a surgical wound, either partially or completely, due to failure of proper wound healing). Additionally, the facility failed to administer physician ordered medications and failed to notify the physician and resident representative (RR) that the medications and treatments were not administered. The census was 84.Review of the facility's physician services policy, copyright 2022, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide care and services related to Physician Services in accordance with State and Federal regulation;-Procedure: 8. All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #96) received appropriate supervision for wandering. The resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 7/26/23. The resident's hospital records showed the resident was found on 7/19/23, by a bystander, confused and wandering around his/her apartment complex. The resident was unable to tell Emergency Medical Staff (EMS) where he/she lived. The resident's family informed hospital staff the resident had been having progressive, worsening mental functioning and forgetfulness. The facility failed to ensure admission staff thoroughly read the hospital records and put elopement/wandering interventions in place upon the resident's admission. On 8/4/23 around 11:40 A.M., the Health Information Director (HID) opened the door and allowed the resident to leave unsupervised. The HID assumed the resident resided in the Independent Living facility. The HID was not aware the resident resided in the skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance to prevent the risk of accidents by failing to ensure appropriate and safe transfer techniques were used in the care of one resident (Resident #1). The resident had a history of a knee replacement and had hardware surgically inserted into the lower end of the femur (upper bone of the leg). As early as 1/28/26, the resident reported pain to the right leg, and no documentation showed staff assessed the leg at this time. On 2/1/26, staff failed to use the foot pedals on the resident's wheelchair while propelling him/her to breakfast and lunch. This resulted in the resident's legs dragging and caused the resident more discomfort in the right leg. In addition, after the resident expressed more pain to the right leg, staff failed to transfer the resident with a mechanical lift per the facility's expectation. An x-ray completed at the facility found a right femur fracture, age-indeterminate (it could not be determined if the fracture was new or old). The physician could not confirm findings on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments and medications were administered as ordered for two of four sampled residents (Resident #4 and Resident #2). The census was 93.Review of the facility's policy on Physician Services, dated 2019, showed the following:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide care and services related to Physician Services in accordance with State and Federal regulations;-Procedure: #8. All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if not followed, the reason shall be recorded on the resident's medical record during that shift. Review of the facility's policy on Administering Medications, dated 2020, showed the following:-Purpose: To ensure safe administration of resident's medication as indicated and ordered by the provider;-Policy: To administer resident medications in a safe manner that will ensure the six rights of patient identification for administration;-Procedure: 1. Medications are to be administered by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from accidents when staff failed to properly secure straps in the facility's van during transportation to an appointment, resulting in one resident flipping backward in their wheelchair (Resident #1). The census 101.The Administrator was notified on 12/16/25 of the past non-compliance. The facility in-serviced staff responsible for providing transportation to residents on proper wheelchair positioning and the facility's policy of transporting one wheelchair-bound resident at time in the medical van. The deficiency was corrected on 12/8/25. Review of the facility's policy on Fleet Safety Program, dated 2021, showed the following:-Purpose: To promote safe operation of vehicles within the facility's community and to satisfy auto insurance underwriting requirements;-Policy: The facility established the Fleet Safety Program applicable to all associates and volunteers of the facility and community;-Driving Guidelines: Accident Protocol will be followed in the event of an accident while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) received care consistent with professional standards when staff failed to report a large bruise and abrasion to the resident's head immediately, delaying assessment, proper care and required notifications to family and physician. The sample size was three. The census was 88.Review of the facility's Change in Condition policy, dated 10/2/23, showed:-Purpose: To provide care and services based upon the current needs of the resident under the direction of the attending provider. To inform resident/resident representative and attending provider when a significant change in resident condition occurs;-Policy: When a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status is identified by the licensed nurse, or when there is a need to alter treatment significantly, the licensed nursing associate consults with the attending provider and notify the resident/resident representative;-Procedure: --Licensed nursing associate: --Assess significant change in the resident's condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when facility staff failed to administer physician ordered medications for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #6) and failed to notify the physician and resident representative (RR) that the medications were not administered. The facility failed to follow parameters in the physician orders for one resident (Resident #5) and administered medications outside of the parameters and did not notify the physician or RR when medication was administered outside the set parameters. The census was 84.Review of the facility's physician services policy, copyright 2022, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide care and services related to Physician Services in accordance with State and Federal regulation;-Procedure: 8. All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if not followed, the reason shall be recorded in the resident's medical record during that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system for records of disposition of all controlled substances (medication that is regulated by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) due to the potential of causing dependency and abuse) in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation with the narcotic delivery reconciliation logs and shift to shift count sheets for four carts out of four carts that had controlled substances. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 84.Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy, copyright 2025, showed:-Purpose: The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications (listed as Schedule II-V (CII, medication with higher potential of dependency and abuse), Schedule three controlled medication (CIII, medication with low to moderate potential of dependency and abuse),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation (unauthorized, improper, or unlawful use of funds or other property) when staff misappropriated $90.00 of the resident's money from his/her personal account and without the resident's consent (Resident #8). The census was 84.Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Plan policy, copyright 2017, showed: -3. Training of Employees, Contract Staff, and Volunteers: Training will be provided to all new and existing employees, contract employees, and volunteers through orientation and annual training programs related to effective communication, dementia management and abuse prevention, freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. This includes training and orientation to resident needs for agency staff. Nurse's aides are required to have 12 hours of training annually. These programs include topics required by 42 C.F.R. S 483.95, including, but not limited to, the following: -a. Definitions of abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for three out of four medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Storage policy, revised, March, 2017, showed: -Policy: Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classifications as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations; -At each shift change, or when keys are transferred, a physical inventory of all controlled substances, including, refrigerated items is conducted by two licensed nurses and is documented on the shift verification of controlled substance count. 1. Review of [NAME] Hall narcotic book count sheets, dated , 3/1 through 3/11/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%. Out of 31 opportunities observed, twelve errors occurred, resulting in a 38.71% error rate (Resident #83, Resident #196, Resident #79 and Resident #197). The census was 93. Review of the facility's Administrating Medications policy, revised 8/31/23, showed: -Purpose: To ensure safe administration of resident's medication as indicated and ordered by the provider; -Procedure: Medications are administered in accordance with the orders and within their prescribed times; The person preparing or administering the medication will contact the provider if there are questions or concerns regarding the medication; With any irregularities, appropriate notifications will be completed for clarification. -Administer medications following the six rights of medication administration; -Right resident; -Right medications; -Right dose; -Right time; -Right route; -Right documentation. Review of the facility's medication crushing guidelines, dated 12/17, showed: -Medications that should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure drugs and biologicals (medications that are grown from bacteria or viruses) stored in the medication room refrigerator were being stored at a proper temperature for 1 out of 1 medication rooms observed. The facility failed to have medication storage boxes filled with medication in a secure area. The census was 93. Review of facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated, March, 2017, showed: -Policy: Medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendation or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. -Procedure: The facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day. 1. Observation on 3/11/25 at 10:30 A.M., of the medication room on Fontbonne/[NAME] Hall, showed a black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a representative of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges, and failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge to one resident (Resident #90) and/or resident representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The sample was 21. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Discharge Planning policy, dated 11/28/17, showed: -Purpose: To prepare the resident for and ensure a safe discharge from the facility; -The policy did not provide guidance related to notification to the Ombudsman regarding resident transfer and discharges; -The policy did provide guidance related to ensuring residents and/or resident representatives are provided with written notification as soon as practicable following a resident's transfer to the hospital. 1. During an interview on 3/6/25 at 2:07 P.M., the Ombudsman said he/she has not received monthly notification of transfers and discharges from the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans within 48 hours of a resident's admission for three residents (Residents #90, #195 and #194). The census was 93. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Assessments and Care Planning policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Purpose: To provide a comprehensive person-centered interdisciplinary care assessment of the resident's condition, in order to develop consistent quality care that will attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychological functioning possible, a facility must make a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) specified by the State; -Policy: --The assessment process begins with the development of the baseline care plan within the first 48 hours of admission. The baseline care plan includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a plan of care specific to each resident's needs. Concerns were found in the care plans for three out of 21 sampled residents when the facilty failed to include the presence of side rails (Resident #52), presence of a urinary catheter (Resident #11), and presence of hospice services (Resident #20) in the resident care plans. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Assessments and Care Planning Policy, revised 9/27/23, showed: -Purpose: To provide a comprehensive person-centered interdisciplinary care assessment of the resident's condition, in order to develop consistent quality care that will attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological functioning possible, a facility must make a comprehensive assessment of each resident's needs, using the Resident Assessment Instrument, (RAI, a federal assessment tool used to identify specific resident needs) specified by the State; -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards of practice when staff held medications for two residents (Residents #79 and #83) with low blood pressure and failed to notify the nurse so the nurse could notify the physician to initiate parameters. Staff failed to ensure medication was available for administration and to administer available medications for one resident (Resident #15), and the facility failed to have a sufficient system in place to track pharmacy refill requests. The sample was 21. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Change in Condition policy, undated, showed; -Purpose: To provide care and services based upon the current needs of the resident under the direction of the attending provider; To inform the resident and/or resident's representative and attending provider with a significant change in a resident occurs; -Policy: When a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status is identified by the licensed nurse, or when there is a need to alter treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for three of 21 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure one resident had accurate skin assessments, trimmed nails and clean skin (Resident #82). The facility also failed to ensure two residents received facial hair grooming (Residents #65 and #20). The census was 93. Review of the facility's ADL policy, dated 2021, showed: -Policy: residents unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal hygiene, elimination, communication and mobility; -Implementation: care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care, mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking), elimination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards. Staff failed to obtain treatment orders for one resident (Resident #195) who had a recent hip surgery. The sample size was 21. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Prevention and Treatment of Skin Breakdown policy, dated 9/1/18, showed: -Purpose: Maintaining intact skin is integral to the resident's health and wellness. Care and service are delivered to maintain skin integrity and promote skin healing if skin breakdown should occur; -Procedure: Skin is observed daily with care; Documentation of the skin impairment is completed in the medical record; Notify the attending provider and the attending provider may provide additional orders. Review of Resident #195's, face sheet, undated, showed: -An admission date of 3/6/25; -Diagnoses that included; right hip fracture, right joint replacement, emphysema (a lung disease), history of falling, and high blood pressure. Review of the resident's record showed: -No baseline care plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #82) had urinary catheter (tube that drains the urine from the bladder) orders and failed to flush one resident's urinary catheter who had a history of hematuria (blood in the urine) (Resident #1). The sample was 21. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections policy, undated, showed when a resident is admitted to the facility with a catheter in place, a thorough physical assessment, as well as history review will be completed. 1. Review of Resident #82's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 2/17/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -The resident has an indwelling urinary catheter; -Diagnosis included cancer, benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH, an enlarged prostate gland) and renal failure, and obstructive uropathy (blockage that makes it difficult for urine to pass); Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed; Problem: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident had all the required physician's orders and documentation of oxygen usage (Resident #16), and failed to ensure one resident's discontinued physician's orders related to oxygen usage were reinstated after a hospital stay (Resident #2). The sample was 21. The census was 93. Review of the facility's oxygen therapy policy, dated 2017, showed: -Policy: Residents are assessed to ensure their respiratory needs are being met. Residents identified in need of oxygen therapy have interventions/equipment implemented in accordance with the resident-centered care plan; -Procedure: Obtain physician orders for specifics regarding administration. Administration of the oxygen therapy is completed by nursing associates. Document assessment of resident oxygen status, tolerance, vital signs, and respiratory status in medical record as necessary. Follow manufacturer recommendations for safe handling, cleaning, humidification, storage, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management for three of 21 sampled residents who experienced pain, consistent with professional standards of practice (Residents #195, #1, and #7). The census was 93. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, dated 2022, showed: -Policy: Benedictine considers pain that impacts the function or quality of life of our residents a significant concern and evaluation will be ongoing. The Benedictine interdisciplinary team will strive to manage pain in residents experiencing mild to debilitating pain to the point where functionality and quality of life can be increased. Benedictine clinicians will be aware of the unique needs and circumstances of residents from different age groups, ethnic and cultural backgrounds. Current and historical medical diagnoses including substance use disorders and mental health diagnoses will be considered when implementing an effective pain management plan of care; -Procedure: Evaluate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and failed to ensure residents using bed/side rails had adequate and on-going assessments to determine the side rails were appropriate and safe for use, obtained informed consent from the resident and/or responsible party, obtained physician orders per facility policy, and included the use of siderails in the resident's care plan. The facility identified 34 residents with side rails in use. Two of 21 sampled residents (Residents #16 and #52) had side rails but were not properly assessed for side rails. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Chemical and Physical Restraints Policy, revised 8/31/23, showed: -The resident has the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's condition. Chemical and/or physical restraints are only used as ordered by the physician; -Consent is obtained after a review of the risks/benefits. In order for consent to be obtained, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #194) was free of significant medication error by not obtaining the residents prescribed antibiotic and antiviral medication in a timely manner. The sample size was 21. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Administrating Medications policy, revised, 8/31/23, showed: -Purpose: To ensure safe administration of resident's medication as indicated and ordered by the provider; -Procedure: Medications are administered in accordance with the orders and within their prescribed times; The person preparing or administering the medication will contact the provider in if there are questions or concerns regarding the medication; With any irregularities, appropriate notifications will be completed for clarification. Review of the facility's Medication Ordering, Receiving and Storage policy, revised July, 2016, showed: -Emergency pharmacy services are available 24 hour basis; The pharmacy phone number is posted at each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately develop and implement infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection caused by transmission-based conditions. The facility also failed to adequately follow its Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy (Residents #194 and #7). This failure had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised 4/1/24, showed: -Enhanced Barrier Precautions is a strategy in nursing homes to decrease transmission of CDC-targeted and other epidemiologically important multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs, an infection resistant to common treatment therapies); -EBP will be used for residents actively infected or colonized with CDC-targeted and other epidemiologically important MDROs; -Additionally, residents at risk for MDROs, specifically those with an indwelling medical device and/or chronic wounds requiring a dressing will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify possible areas of entrapment to reduce the risk of accidents for two residents (Residents #16 and #52). The facility identified 34 residents with side rails in use. The census was 93. Review of the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) guidance, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/06, showed: -It is suggested that facilities and manufacturers determine the level of risk for entrapment and take steps to mitigate the risk. Evaluating the dimensional limits of the gaps in hospital beds is one component of an overall assessment and mitigation strategy to reduce entrapment; -The population most vulnerable to entrapment are elderly patients and residents, especially those who are frail, confused, restless, or who have uncontrolled body movement; -Bed rails (commonly used synonymous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered (Resident #1). The resident sample was 6. The census was 87. Review of Resident #1's hospital discharge/transfer sheet, dated 5/29/24, showed: -Weigh daily; -Contact the physician if there is a weight gain of 3 pounds or more in a day or 5 pounds or more in two days. Review of Resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the staff, dated 6/4/24, showed: -admission date 5/29/24; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump enough blood); -Weight loss of 5% or more in last month or a weight loss of 10% or more in last six months; -On a physician's weight loss program -Weight 160 pounds. Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), dated 5/29/24 through 6/27/24, showed the following orders: -Weigh daily; -Call physician for weight gain greater than 2.5 pound in 48 hours or 5 pounds above admission weight. Review of the resident's baseline care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist reports any irregularities to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing, and ensure these reports were acted upon. In addition, the facility failed to develop and maintain policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that include, but are not limited to, time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident for four of seven residents investigated for the monthly medication regimen review (Residents #65, #68, #48, and #8). This had the potential to affect all residents with irregularities identified during the monthly medication review. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Consultant Pharmacist Service Provider Requirements policy, provided as the facility's policy and procedure for the required monthly medication review for residents, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN - form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two out of two sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services (Residents #191 and #101). The facility census was 86. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC - form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were complete, accurate, reviewed, and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, for five of 18 sampled residents (Residents #82, #83, #44, # 48, and #68). The census was 86. 1. Review of Resident #82's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 9/13/23, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Rolling from left to right, moving from sitting to lying and lying to sitting: Substantial/maximal assistance needed; -Diagnoses include kidney disease and diabetes; -Care Area Assessment Summary (CAAS) triggered and was identified as care planned by the facility for: Visual function, activity of daily living (ADL) functional/rehab potential, urinary incontinence and indwelling catheter, falls, nutritional status, dehydration/fluid maintenance, pressure ulcer, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for three out of three controlled substance shift change count sheets reviewed. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements policy, revised August 2014, showed: -The consultant pharmacist provides consultation on all aspects of the provision of pharmacy services in the facility; -Establishing a system of records for receipt and disposition of all controlled medications to enable an accurate reconciliation, and determining that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled medications is maintained and periodically reconciled. 1. Review of the [NAME] Hall Certified Medication Technician (CMT) controlled substance shift change count sheet, dated 10/1/23 through 10/24/23, showed 25 out of 69 opportunities were left blank and undocumented for on-coming and off-going staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days, except when the prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the as needed order to be extended beyond 14 days, has documented the rationale in the resident's medical record, and indicated the duration of the as needed order. The facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction was attempted or documented as contraindicated for residents who receive psychotropic medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and documented prior to administration of a psychotropic medication, for three of five residents investigated for unnecessary psychotropic medications (Residents #65, #8, and #68). The census was 86. Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, last reviewed 9/7/23, showed: -Purpose: Psychotropic medications are used when ordered by medical providers after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional, psychiatric, social, and environmental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted practices. These practices affected two of four medication carts reviewed and one out of two medications rooms reviewed. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy, revised on 2014, showed: -Policy: -Medications and biologicals (vaccines) are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications; -Procedure (includes): -The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet regulatory requirements, including standards set forth by the United States Pharmacopoeia. Medications are kept in containers; -All medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy label; -Except for medications requiring refrigeration or freezing, medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eating assistance to one resident (Resident #44) for two of two observed meals. The resident was observed feeding himself/herself with his/her fingers. Staff did not provide assistance. The sample was 18. The census was 86. Review of the undated Activity of Daily Living (ADL) policy, showed: -Purpose: To provide residents with care, treatment and services appropriate to maintain or improve the ability to carry out ADLs; -Policy: Residents unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal hygiene; -Implementation: -Care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with dining (meals and snacks); -If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia exhibit behavioral expressions of resistance to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #92) was free from significant medication error when staff failed to ensure the resident's ordered breathing treatment was delivered timely. The resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital with respiratory failure and Covid-19. The resident did not receive the ordered breathing treatments all days of the stay, from 9/29/23 through 10/4/23. The sample size was 37. The census was 86. Review of the Verbal and Telephone Order policy, showed: -Purpose: To ensure timely and efficient verbal and telephone orders from the provider; -Policy: Verbal and telephone orders are obtained in a situation when the provider is unable to write or sign the order at the time of entry and are transcribed; -Procedure: The nurse receiving the verbal order will write it on the physician order sheet or enter it into the electronic health record (EHR). Review of Resident #92's medical record, showed: -admitted : 9/29/23; -discharged : 10/4/23; -Diagnoses included: respiratory failure related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one resident observed during personal care and transfer when staff failed to change gloves, sanitize hands, and sanitize shared medical equipment using acceptable standards of practice (Resident #82). The census was 86. Review of the facility's Using a Mechanical Lifting Machine policy, dated July 2017, showed lift care: -Disinfect lifting surfaces; -Wipe with a clean towel until dry. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated June 2017, showed: -Infection prevention begins with the basic hand hygiene. By following proper hand hygiene practices, associates will reduce the spread of potentially deadly germs, as well as reduce the risk of healthcare provider colonization caused by germs acquired from the residents; -It is the policy that all associates will be trained and competent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse and neglect policy and complete a prompt and thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse, for three of 19 sampled residents (Residents #42, #3 and #13). The census was 81. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Plan, dated 11/28/17 and revised on 8/14/20, showed: -Prevention of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and financial exploitation: -Identify, correct and intervene in situations where abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and/or financial exploitation occurs; -Require staff to report concerns, incidents and grievances immediately to their supervisor. Concerns, incidents and grievances are promptly investigated and appropriate steps are taken to minimize the likelihood of re-occurrences; -Abuse prevention plans. The facility will develop an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult who receives services in the facility; -The plan shall contain an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. In addition, the facility failed to properly document narcotic counts for controlled substances, for five of six medication carts. The census was 81. 1. Review of the nurse's narcotic count sheet, dated 10/1/20 through 10/6/20, for [NAME] Hall, showed the following: -No signature by the on-coming nurse, total of five shifts; -No signature by the off-going nurse, total of five shifts; -Total narcotic drug cards not documented as counted, a total of five shifts; -Total narcotic drug cards not legible counted, a total of one shift. 2. Review of the nurse's narcotic count sheet, dated 10/1/20 through 10/6/20, for FontBonne Hall, showed the following: -No signature by the on-coming nurse, total of three shifts; -No signature by the off-going nurse, total of two shifts; -Total narcotic drug cards not documented as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident monthly pharmacy drug regimen recommendations were reviewed and the facility failed to notify the physician, medical director, and director of nursing of irregularities, for two of 9 residents sampled for medication review (Residents #57 and #29). In addition, the facility's policy failed to include time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he/she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy, dated 12/1/07, showed: -The facility should ensure that facility physicians/prescribers are provided with copies of MMRs; -Facility should encourage physician/prescribers or other responsible parties receiving the MMR and the Director of Nursing to act upon recommendations contained in the MMR. For those issues that require physician/prescriber intervention, facility should encourage physician/prescriber to either accept and act upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff labeled drugs and biologicals per acceptable standards of practice when staff failed to date insulin flexpens (prefilled injectable insulin) once they were opened, ensure legible dates and resident names were on the label and failed to discard opened insulin flexpens for residents discharged from the facility, for two of four medication carts checked. The census was 81. 1. Observation on 10/6/20 at 7:56 A.M., of the nurse's medication cart, front hall of [NAME], showed the following: -One Novolog (fast acting) insulin flexpen opened without a date written when opened. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said the resident was discharged ; -One Lantus (long acting) insulin flexpen opened without a date written when opened; -One Humalog (fast acting) insulin flexpen opened without a legible date written when opened and labeled with illegible resident's name; -One Novolog flexpen opened without a legible date written when opened and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable infection control standards were used when staff failed to clean/disinfect a gait belt (a device used to transfer residents from one position to another) that is used on multiple residents, before or after use for one resident (Resident #66) and failed to clean/disinfect the sit to stand lift (mechanical lift) that is used on multiple residents, before/after use for one resident (Resident #57). In addition, staff failed to wash or sanitize their hands after removing gloves while providing personal care to one resident (Resident #69) and failed to cover clean laundry that was hanging in the hall, five out of five days observed. The resident sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization-Overview Policy, dated 2017, showed: -Purpose: To prevent the growth of organisms on equipment thus preventing the transmission of infection; -Policy: Cleaning, disinfection, and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report alleged violations of abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, after two allegations of abuse. This affected one of 19 sampled residents (Resident #42). The facility census was 81. Review of the facility Abuse Prevention Plan, dated 11/28/17 and revised on 8/14/20, showed: -Prevention of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and financial exploitation: -Identify, correct and intervene in situations where abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and/or financial exploitation occurs; -Require staff to report concerns, incidents and grievances immediately to their supervisor. Concerns, incidents and grievances are promptly investigated and appropriate steps are taken to minimize the likelihood of re-occurrences; -Identification of possible incidents which need investigation: -Any person with the knowledge or suspicion of suspected abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and/or financial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice when staff failed documented the fluid and meal intake of two residents as indicated in their plan of care (Residents #27 and #179). In addition, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered (Resident #179). The resident sample at 19. The census was 81. 1. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the staff, dated 8/5/20, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Required supervision with meals; -Weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last six months, marked yes. Not on physician prescribed weight loss. Review of the resident's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnosis included: anxiety, dementia, and contracture of left hand (rigidity of the muscles). Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), dated 10/7/20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to shave and provide nail care for two residents who were dependent on staff for care needs (Residents #23 and #29). The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility policies, showed; -No policy for fingernail care, shaving care or oral; -A staff skill competency check form for fingernail care, oral care and shaving with electric razor (dated 2009). The competency check forms did not indicate how often to provided nail care or shaving care or when this care would be indicated as needed. 1. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/18/20, showed extensive assistance required for personal hygiene. Review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), showed diagnoses included altered mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received Restorative Therapy (RT) as indicated for three resident's (Residents #23, #30 and #22) sampled who had orders for RT. The sample was 19. Census was 81. Review of the facilities Restorative Program policy, dated 2017, showed: -Purpose: To ensure residents are comprehensively assessed/reassessed for restorative needs; -Policy: To provide a basic outline and guidance for implementation and tracking of restorative programs established so that each resident can attain and maintain highest physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Restorative nursing care promotes resident's highest level of independence in each of the following areas: -Activities of Daily Living (ADLs); -Splints/brace; -Range of Motion (ROM); -Ambulation; -Bed Mobility; -Procedure: Upon admission/readmission/significant change in status the resident will be assed for potential restorative needs; -Analysis of the assessment will determine which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate assistance to prevent accidents when staff transferred a resident improperly when using a mechanical lift for one of three transfers observed. In addition, staff failed to investigate the cause of a skin tear so interventions could be implemented to prevent further injury for one (Resident #23). The sample size was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's policies showed: -No mechanical lift policy; -A staff skill competency form for mechanical lifts, dated 2009 provided. Review of the undated staff skill competency form, showed: -Obtain assistance from experienced team member; -Instruct your assistant to guide resident to chair. Watch that arms, legs and tubing are safe; -Check that the base of the legs for the lift are properly positioned to support resident weight. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the facility's Hoyer lift (mechanical lift), showed it included the following: -Before lifting or transferring the resident, the base legs MUST be LOCKED…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis center. The facility also failed to obtain a dialysis contract. The facility identified one resident receiving dialysis (Resident #40). The resident sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's 2017 dialysis (process for removing toxins from the blood for individuals with kidney failure) policy, showed: -Policy: Dialysis is provided via contract with an external agency. Care for residents that requires dialysis will be managed by licensed associates and through communication with a certified dialysis service; -Procedure: Residents are informed of the dialysis services the community can accommodate at the time of admission and dually informed if such services are required for the resident following admission; -The licensed nurse and other professionals provide ongoing assessment of the residents' condition from a multidisciplinary standpoint and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychiatric medications were evaluated after 14 days of use for one of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications (Resident #66). The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of Resident #66's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/2/20, showed diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, heart failure and diabetes. Review of facility's policy for psychotropic medication use, dated 2018, showed: -Psychotropic medications ae given upon a medical provider order; -The nursing associates collaborate with the medical provider to ensure the lowest possible dosage is given for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reductions and re-review; -As needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheets (ePOS), showed the following: -An order dated 9/11/20, for Ativan (used to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg), one tablet, every six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-03-14 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explicitly inform the resident or their representative of their right not to sign an arbitration agreement (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) as a condition of admission, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility, and to have the residents properly indicate their choices on signed admission agreements for two of three residents sampled for review of arbitration agreements (Residents #1 and #52). The census was 93. Review of the facility's admission packet, showed, dated September 2019, showed: -Arbitration: --A. By selecting I agree to arbitrate and initialing below, you agree to the following: -1. You acknowledge that you have read and understand this Section VII and agree that any disputes related to this Agreement or any service provided by Community except those disputes excluded below will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-26 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make available the results of the most recent annual survey and any abbreviated survey completed since the most recent annual survey, in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. The census was 86. Observation 10/23/23 at 1:15 P.M., showed the facility's survey results binder labeled and located in the activity room. Review of the facility's survey results binder, showed: -It included the statement of deficiencies (SOD) for the most recent health annual survey, dated 10/9/20. No plan of correction (POC) was included; -No Life Safety Code SOD or POC for the annual survey completed on 10/9/20; -No SOD or POC for the abbreviated survey and infection control survey, completed on 5/10/21; -No SOD or POC for the abbreviated surveys completed on 11/2/21, 12/8/21, 3/29/22, 8/12/22, 11/1/22 or 5/2/23. During an interview on 10/23/23 at 6:04 P.M., the Administrator said she expected the abbreviated surveys, to include the SOD and POC, as well as the POC for the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$11,928 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $11,928 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-14 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 4.0 | -3.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF CARONDELET ST LOUIS PROVINCE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 07/01/2009 |
| COLLINS, JULIE | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/09/2021 |
| BRUHN, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2020 |
| DEBLOIS, BEVERLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2020 |
| ESSIG, LEONARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/30/2014 |
| HADICAN, MARY KAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/30/2014 |
| HARRIS, MARIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| HAYWOOD, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| HOGAN, SEAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| LUDWIG, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/30/2014 |
| LUTZEIER, FRED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| MOORE, ELAINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2011 |
| RAPP, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2016 |
| RYMANOWSKI, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2011 |
| BERGIEN, TRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/23/2017 |
| BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2009 |
| CARLEY, GERALD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/18/2017 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265636. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.