Regina Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. R1 admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers, subsequently developed an unstageable pressure ulcer related to necrotic (death of tissue). The facility failed to provide ongoing comprehensive skin assessments, monitor for signs of infection/deterioration, and notify R1's provider of changes, resulting in R1 being hospitalized . The immediate jeopardy began on 8/15/23, when a pressure ulcer was noted to R1's buttocks without proper assessment, physician notification, and documentation of interventions and was identified on 10/4/23. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the on 10/4/23 at 4:55 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/6/23 but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level 2, D - isolated scope and severity level, which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and evaluate the appropriateness of the colostomy care supplies and ensure proper fitting of the wafer to prevent leakages and failed to provide physician-ordered care for colostomy care for one resident (R1). This failure caused psychosocial harm to R1 when his colostomy care was delayed, and he suffered emotional distress and suicidal ideation. Findings include:On 7/15/25, at 10:21 a.m., R1 stated he had several episodes of his colostomy leaking in the first few weeks at the facility. R1 stated he repeatedly asked the facility to use the products he was familiar with, including rings (intended to create a secure and comfortable seal between an ostomy pouch and the skin around the stoma, to prevent leakage) and wings (small flexible pieces of hydrocolloid adhesive that attach to the edges of an ostomy skin barrier to provide extra security and prevent leaks). R1 stated the facility started providing the requested supplies, after he became…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to clean and sanitize food-contact equipment, remove a paper bowl used as a scoop in a sugar container and keep food boxes off walk-in freezer unit floor. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 2/23/26 at 12:15 p.m., with the culinary director (CD), the following was identified: seven boxes were stored on the Walk-in freezer floor, a brown paper bowel used as scoop left in the sugar container and the can opener part that meets the top of the can (blade and gear) was covered with dark dry substance. CD confirmed the scoop in the sugar container, is not the usual practice indicated it could cause for cross contamination. During a follow up kitchen tour 2/25/26 at 7:52 a.m., the can opener blade and gear remained covered with the dark dry substance and additionally a red paste was noted on the blade. Head cook (HC) indicated it was used and must have gotten dirty yesterday.In the walk-in freezer, five food boxes remained on the floor. HC stated the boxes were not supposed to be on the floors and were delivered the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to correctly establish and ensure staff followed appropriate transmission-based precaution (TBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R66) who required enhanced respiratory precautions for COVID-19. Further, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was used for residents in enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) during podiatry treatments in a common area for 1 of 3 residents (R57) reviewed for EBP. Additionally, the facility failed to initiate EBP for 1 of 1 resident (R33) who required EBP due to a pressure ulcer.Findings include: R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a hospital, her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had not been completed at time of survey. R66's progress note dated 2/21/26 indicated R66 had severe cognitive impairment. R66 had a diagnosis of dementia (syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained during treatments for 3 of 3 residents (R29, R54, R57) reviewed for privacy.Findings include:During an observation on 2/23/26 at 1:19 p.m., R57 was in the facility day room receiving podiatry (foot)cares. R54 and R29 were in the day room waiting for their podiatry appointments. Upon completion of foot care, R57 was removed from room by the podiatry medical assistant (MA)-A. MA-A returned and moved R54 so his foot cares could be completed. R29 remained in the day room during R54's podiatry treatments. Once completed R54 was assisted out of the room by facility staff. MA-A then moved R29 so she could have her podiatry cares completed. During R29's podiatry treatment, nursing staff and cleaning staff were walking through the day room. Upon completion, R29 was taken back to her room by facility staff.R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment, dated 1/8/26, indicated R29 had severe cognitive impairment. Further, R29 was dependent on facility staff for all cares. R29's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an evaluation was completed prior to renewal of PRN (as needed) antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents (R10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/26 indicated R10 had severe cognitive impairment with a history of verbal behaviors. The MDS also indicated R10 was receiving hospice care and received antipsychotic medications (medications used to treat mental health disorders and behavioral disturbances). R10's diagnoses list included, unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety, protein-calorie malnutrition.R10's care plan indicated mood state related to diagnosis of anxiety and restlessness and agitation, high risk medications including Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication), hospice services, and cognitive loss related to dementia.R10's medication administration record indicated R10 received haloperidol 1 mg every 4 hours PRN from 1/26-2/8 (21 doses given), haloperidol 1 mg every 1 hour 2/10-2/12 (4 doses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 2 of 2 residents (R24, R33) reviewed for care planning.Findings include: R33's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/14/26, indicated intact cognition. R33 required substantial assistance with toileting and bed mobility, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and continent of bowel. R33 was at risk for a pressure ulcer, had no pressure ulcer/injury on admission. R33 had a pressure reducing device for chair and bed. R33's diagnoses included, cerebral infarction (CVA) (blood clot in the brain), pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (a serious condition of the heart's ability to pump blood efficiently), and edema (swelling). R33's admission skin risk assessments, dated 1/8/26 indicated at risk for pressure ulcers with an intervention to reposition every two to three hours. R33's care plan dated 1/12/26, indicated R33 needs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration per physician order for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R54) reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact with no behaviors, have pressure reducing devices, nutritional supplementation, and dressings. R1 was independent with eating, set up for oral hygiene and required assistance for all activities of daily living. R1's care plan indicated R1 had wounds to both feet, impaired cardiac output, enhanced barrier precautions related to wounds, and diabetes, R1's diagnoses list included, cerebral palsy (brain disorder causing decreased muscle coordination) , peripheral vascular disease (disorder affecting circulation in the arms and legs), diabetes (disorder affecting blood sugar levels), respiratory failure (disorder affecting breathing), lymphedema (disorder causing fluid collection under the skin), and venous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for effectiveness of a medication prescribed for sleep for 1 of 5 residents (R47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/25 identified R47 had no cognitive impairment, had lower extremity impairment on one side, maximum assistance with transfer and bed mobility, independent with toilet transfer, incontinent of bowel and bladder.R47 diagnoses include polyneuropathy (a condition in which multiple peripheral nerves are damaged, leading to weakness, numbness and impaired function in various parts of the body), type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, and laceration to right great toe. R47's medication orders included: Melatonin tablet 5 milligram (mg), oral at bedtime: Start date 11/22/24. R47's Medication Administration Record (MAR) record review from 1/01/26 to 1/31/26 and 2/01/26 to 2/25/26 indicated medication was administered. R47's record lacked sleep tracking or monitoring assessment. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer a care conference during 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for ostomy care. This resulted in R1's inability to participate in his care planning.Findings include:R1's care plan, dated 6/6/25, indicated he required assist of one staff for personal cares. The care plan lacked individualized care for R1's colostomy, as it did not specify the supplies requires or the process to complete the colostomy care.R1's medication administration record (MAR), dated June and July 2025, directed to change ostomy bag two times weekly and as needed for leakage, on Monday and Wednesday evenings.R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of Crohn's disease (chronic inflammatory bowel disease) and had a colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdominal wall, bringing a portion of the large intestine to the surface). R1's MDS indicated he was cognitively intact.R1's chart lacked documentation of a care conference.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for ostomy care. The facility failed to have a process in place to instruct staff on physician ordered ostomy care. This resulted in R1's colostomy bag leaking on multiple occasions and emotional distress for R1.Findings include: R1's care plan, dated 6/6/25, indicated he required assist of one staff for personal cares. The care plan lacked individualized care for R1's colostomy, as it did not specify the supplies requires or the process to complete the colostomy care.R1's medication administration record (MAR), dated June and July 2025, directed to change ostomy bag two times weekly and as needed for leakage, on Monday and Wednesday evenings.R1's bowel assessment, dated 6/8/25, failed to appropriately assess his ostomy site with measurements and description.R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of Crohn's disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for ostomy care, received colostomy care as ordered by the physician. This resulted in inappropriate care, as evidenced by frequent leakage incidents for R1.Findings include: R1's care plan, dated 6/6/25, indicated he required assist of one staff for personal cares. The care plan lacked individualized care for R1's colostomy, as it did not specify the supplies requires or the process to complete the colostomy care. R1's after discharge orders from the hospital, dated 6/5/25 directed:Procedure for pouch change:1) Prepare new pouch, using a Coloplast 16716 or your normal pouches. Opening should be 1/16- 1/8 larger than the stoma. Set pouch aside.2) Remove old pouch, and discard.3) Cleanse peristomal area with warm water only and Versalon 4 x 4's (#118746). *Do not use soap, wipes, adhesive remover, or skin prep to cleanse peristomal skin.4) Allow skin to dry. At this point - CRUST the peristomal skin 1x. See below…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,919 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,919 — penalty dated 2023-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $697K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN