La Crescent Health Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 30.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.38 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.56 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to prevent complications of enteral feeding and failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed who required tube feedings and medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube). This failure created the likelihood of serious harm for R5, including worsening symptoms of nausea and vomiting, and additional hospital visits. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 4/8/26 when the facility failed to follow professional standards of medication administration through a g-tube, pharmacy directions for medication administration, identify the symptoms and side effects of incorrectly using the g-tube. Subsequently, R5 experienced nausea and vomiting and was sent to the hospital with a diagnosis of pneumonia. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 4/9/26 at 6:17 p.m. The IJ was removed on 4/13/26 at 4:07 p.m., however, noncompliance remained at a lower scope and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a timely manner to preserve desired temperatures of food for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R10, R15, R30) reviewed who expressed concerns for food temperatures and palatability. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. Findings include: On 4/8/26 at 1:34 p.m., an informal resident council meeting was held with R10, R15 and R30. The residents were asked, as part of the meeting, about bedtime snacks which prompted a conversation regarding food. R30 stated that she eats in the dining room for her meals and her food was frequently served cold. R30 stated this had been an issue for a long time and had talked to staff about this. R10 stated today my food was ice cold even with the cover on it. R10 stated the facility started putting covers on the food and it isn't helpful. R10 stated he eats his meals in the dining room, and his meals are almost always cold when they should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and care plan to ensure competency and safety with self-administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident (R20) observed to be self-administering medication in their room.Findings include: R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/12/26, identified R20 had intact cognition. On 4/8/26 at approximately 7:20 a.m., R20 was observed sitting in her Broda chair (a type of positioning chair) in her room. R20 was administered her morning oral medications by registered nurse (RN)-A along with an inhaler after performing a respiratory assessment. RN-A prepared R20's nebulizer and placed the mask on R20's face. RN-A placed R20's call light pad on her lap and instructed her to turn her call light on when the treatment was completed. R20 stated she always puts the light on when she was finished with the treatment. On 4/8/26 at 7:52 a.m., assistant director of nursing (ADON) told RN-A that she had removed R20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative/Power of Attorney (POA) about refusal of care and/or treatment for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for notification of changes.Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had clear speech, no hearing disabilities, and used corrective lenses. R5 had moderate cognitive impairment with no rejection of care. R5 had no impairments of her upper extremities and used a walker. R5 was independent with eating, required set up/clean up assistance with oral hygiene, and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. R5 had occasional urinary incontinence but was always continent of bowel. R5 required hydration and nutrition via a feeding tube (g-tube). During a record review, R5's dismissal summary from the 2/12/26 hospitalization; the hospital physician stated, R5 is unable to receive and evaluate information effectively and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate side effect monitoring for potential orthostatic hypotension (sudden drop in blood pressure what occurs when a person stands up after sitting or lying down) was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for unnecessary medication use and who consumed antipsychotic medication.Findings include: Review of the 7/24/24, Olanzapine guidelines, located at: https://www.drugs.com/olanzapine.html#side-effects, identified olanzapine may cause serious side effects such as low blood pressure. Common side effects of olanzapine that affect 5% or more people who take it include postural hypotension (a drop in blood pressure when going from a lying or sitting position to standing). R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R15 had no cognitive impairment and demonstrated no hallucinations or delusional thinking during the review period. Further, the MDS recorded R15 consumed antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antianxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility to implement policies and procedures to ensure the State agency (SA) was notified in a timely manner for allegations of abuse for 1 of 1 residents (R32) whose allegations were reviewed.Findings include: R32's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/24/26, identified R32 had moderately impaired cognition, required maximum staff assistance with dressing, moderate assistance with transfers and displayed no hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care behaviors. R32's care plan, initiated on 6/20/23, identified R32 as a vulnerable adult at risk for potential abuse due to Alzheimer's disease and identified facility staff are education on reporting abuse and facility staff will follow facility policy and procedures. During an observation on 4/6/26 at 2:08 p.m., R32 was observed playing Bingo in the dining room with other residents and staff. At 3:36 p.m., R32 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R32 stated she couldn't remember how long she had been at the facility and directed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Cate (LTC) Ombudsman for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R39) reviewed for hospitalizations and discharges. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had clear speech, no hearing disabilities, and used corrective lenses. R5 had moderate cognitive impairment with no rejection of care. R5 had no impairments of her upper extremities and used a walker. R5 was independent with eating, required set up/clean up assistance with oral hygiene, and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. R5 had occasional urinary incontinence but was always continent of bowel. R5's face sheet indicated R5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5 was hospitalized on [DATE] and 3/6/26. R5's Progress notes lacked any communication with the ombudsman after each hospitalization. Review of the notices to the Ombudsman, provided by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had clear speech, no hearing disabilities, and used corrective lenses. R5 had moderate cognitive impairment with no rejection of care. R5 had no impairments of her upper extremities and used a walker. R5 was independent with eating, required set up/clean up assistance with oral hygiene, and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. R5 had occasional urinary incontinence but was always continent of bowel. R5 required hydration and nutrition via a feeding tube (g-tube). R5's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] noted the following:-Pressure injury to coccyx: red, blanchable: treatment offloading, barrier cream (Zinc, Petroleum) and open to air-Skin problem to left heel: clean,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed during medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for gastrostomy tube (g-tube) medication administration.Findings include:According to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition article, Medication via Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Clinician's Guide, located at https://nutritioncare.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Medications-Via-EN-Tubes.pdf, identified prior to administering medications through a g-tube, medications should be verified for right client, right medication, right dose, right time, right route, and right documentation. When administering medication through a g-tube, medications should be crushed and diluted with 15-20 milliliters (ml) of purified water (sterile or distilled) separately. Additionally, the head of the bed (HOB) should be elevated at least 30-45 degrees during medication administration and for at least 30-60 minutes after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to monitor and implement individualized interventions to prevent/mitigate the risk of pressure ulcers and/or deterioration for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings Include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had clear speech, no hearing disabilities, and used corrective lenses. R5 had moderate cognitive impairment with no rejection of care. R5 had no impairments of her upper extremities and used a walker. R5 was independent with eating, required set up/clean up assistance with oral hygiene, and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. R5 had occasional urinary incontinence but was always continent of bowel. R5's current face sheet identified diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor daily oral intake and daily output; additionally, the facility failed to develop a system to monitor and assess daily intake and output for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed who required nutritional and hydration support via a gastrostomy tube (g-tube).Findings Include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had clear speech, no hearing disabilities, and used corrective lenses. R5 required hydration and nutrition via a feeding tube (g-tube). R5's current face sheet identified diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) requiring the placement of a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) for nutrition and medication administration. R5's care plan dated 1/26/26 indicated R5 required tube feeding, hydration, and flushes per order, check tube placement prior to meds and feedings, elevating head of bed 30-45 degrees, care of tube per orders, and report signs of aspiration or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $172K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN