No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lake Country Health Services

2195 North Summit Village Way, Oconomowoc, WI 53066 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (262) 560-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$120,868 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $120,868 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-12)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
36500 Aurora Dr · (262) 434-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
36500 Aurora Dr Ste 100 · (262) 434-7700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1111 E Delafield Rd · (262) 560-3300 · Call to confirm hours
Park
37505 Genesee Lake Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2431 N Dousman Rd · (262) 264-5440

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.2%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.6%2.1%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.2%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.5%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.3%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.5%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.1%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.9%23.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%15.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.781.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.572.291.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.9%CMS range 52.5–65.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.2%CMS range 9.9–17.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.4%CMS range 6.9–16.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.97
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.70
RN hoursweekends
51.8%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's advanced directive of do not resuscitate for 1 (R1) of 4 residents reviewed for advanced directives and resident's rights. R1 has a State Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form signed by R1's Power of Attorney (POA), and an active Medical Doctor (MD) order documenting DNR. On [DATE], R1 became unresponsive and was pulseless. Facility staff did not check R1's advanced directives before performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) compressions on R1. R1's pulse returned. After receiving compressions, R1 complained of pain as high as 10 out of 10 and required an added MD order for Morphine to control R1's pain. The facility's failure to honor R1's DNR wishes led to facility staff completing chest compressions through the act of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) that caused R1 to be resuscitated, despite the formulation of an advanced directive to decline such measures and which led to R1 experiencing extreme pain post resuscitation. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that 1 out of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for abuse allegations was free from exploitation, abuse of power, and mental abuse. A facility Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA-C) and R1 exchanged phone numbers and began a friendship which included several text messages between the two individuals over several months. CNA-C and R1 continued with the relationship to the point that R1 believed CNA-C was his girlfriend and that he would eventually leave the facility and they would live together. CNA-C often visited R1 in his room while she was working and assigned to other units. CNA-C and R1 did become intimate, often talking sexually in text messages, sharing several kisses, laying under covers with one another, and touching in a sexual manner. CNA-C purchased gifts for R1 and would visit even when she was not working. Ultimately the relationship ended, and CNA-C became very adamant the relationship was never real and she wanted no further contact. CNA-C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) On 10/23/24 at 9:10 AM, Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON)-B for the faciliy's neuro-check policy. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A returned to surveyor and informed surveyor that the incident involving the Hoyer lift bar hitting R5's head would be addressed in the fall policy under the neuro-checks section. NHA-A stated the facility does not have a separate neuro-check policy. The facility policy entitled, Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines with a review date of 7/18/24, documents, in part: . Neuro checks for any unwitnessed fall or witnessed fall, where resident hits their head: Initially, then hourly x 3, then continue neuro checks every 4 hours x 6, then continue neuro checks every 8 hours x 6 or as indicated by the physician. Alert MD (Medical Doctor) of any abnormal findings from neuro checks- do not wait until series is complete to notify MD of abnormal findings. In a document entitled, Post-Fall Assessments dated, August of 2021, The American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 of 2 residents (R14 & R5) received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. * R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fracture of right pubis and history of falls. The facility did not develop a person centered falls care plan and this care plan did not address R14 self transferring. On 7/17/24, R14 attempted to self transfer, fell, and was transferred to the hospital. The hospital ED (emergency department) notes document a new sacral fracture. * R5 was transferred by 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA-CC and CNA-DD, via a Hoyer lift on 9/6/24. During the transfer, the bar from the Hoyer lift hit R5's head causing pain. R5 was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation. R5 returned to the facility with a diagnosis of a mild concussion. CNA-CC stated that CNA-CC did not receive formal training on Hoyer lift transfers prior to transferring R5 on 9/6/24. Findings include: The facility's policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure its medication error rate was below 5%. The facility error rate was 7.69% affecting 2 residents (R12 and R67) observed during medication pass. Findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 5/7/25 documents (in part) .Staff will ensure each medication is safely administered per practitioner's orders.24. Staff will administer all medications following the Six Rights of Medication Administration: Right resident, right medication, right dose, right time, right route, right documentation. On 8/25/25, at 7:15 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-C prepare medications for R67. The following medications were prepared: Amlodipine Besylate 10 MG (milligram) 1 tablet, Baclofen 10 MG 1 tablet, Cetirizine HCL (Hydrochloride) 10 MG 1 tablet, Apixaban (Eliquis) 5 MG 1 tablet, Ferrous Sulfate 325 MG 1 tablet, Furosemide 40 MG 1 tablet, Lisinopril 10 MG 1 tablet, Oxybutynin Chloride 5 MG 1 tablet, Pantoprazole 40 MG Delayed Release 1 tablet, Polyethylene Glycol 3350 Powder for Oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 4 medications carts observed. Findings include:The facility policy titled Administration of Insulin with Insulin Pen dated [DATE] documents (in part) .Trained staff working under registered nurse delegation will safely and effectively administer insulin. It is the policy of this facility to use insulin pens in order to improve the accuracy of insulin dosing, provide increased resident comfort, and serve as a teaching aid to prepare residents for self-administration of insulin therapy upon discharge.3. Insulin pens must be clearly labeled with the resident name, physician name, date dispensed, type of insulin, amount to be given, frequency, and expiration date.10. Insulin pens should be disposed of after 28 days or according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The facility policy titled Administration of Eye Drops and Ointment dated [DATE] documents (in part)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a policy and procedure in place to ensure the code status of residents, as indicated in their advanced directives, was followed. This affected 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. The facility's phone paging system, which is used to alert all staff of a code blue, was observed not working during survey. The facility's portable phones, which can also be used to alert all staff of a code blue, were not functional on all the units within the facility. The facility's overhead speaker system has not been functional for years. This deficient practice has the potential to effect 27 out of 82 residents who have designated to have full code status (designated to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]) in the facility. *The facility does not have a Code Blue policy and procedure. *R1 has a signed State DNR form, and an active MD order documenting DNR. On [DATE], R1 became unresponsive and was pulseless.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 4 residents were free from significant medication errors. *On [DATE], R1 was prescribed scheduled morphine due to severe chest and back pain. On [DATE], R1 was not administered the full dosage of their scheduled morphine for four consecutive opportunities. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Cerebrovascular disease, Dementia, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Pacemaker, and Type 2 Diabetes. R1's Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] documents that R1 is severely cognitively impaired and requires partial to moderate assist for toileting, mobility and transfer. Surveyor reviewed R1's closed medical record including progress notes, Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR), physicians orders and comprehensive care plans. Surveyor noted R1 was started on hospice services on [DATE] with the goal of comfort measures due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they reported allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and to the State Survey Agency. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R1). Facility staff became aware of a relationship between R1 and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-C that included months of communication via phone calls, text messages, and in-person visits to the resident's room. CNA-C would often visit R1 while working at the facility when she was not assigned to his unit. By the staff not reporting to Administration what they had heard and observed, it allowed the alleged perpetrator (CNA-C) continued access to R1. In addition, the facility failed to submit to the State Survey Agency within the required timeframes, the allegation of sexual abuse and exploitation when they were finally made aware in August 2024. CNA-C worked various shifts, on multiple units of the facility. This had the potential to effect the entire census of 69 residents. Findings include: The facility's policy dated as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure allegations of abuse/exploitation were thoroughly investigated for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed (R1, R6). * Facility staff became aware of a relationship between R1 and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-C that included months of communication via phone calls, text messages, and in-person visits to the resident's room. CNA-C would often visit R1 while working at the facility when she was not assigned to his unit. By the staff not reporting to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) what they had heard and observed, it allowed the alleged perpetrator (CNA-C) continued access to R1. When NHA did become aware that R1 and CNA-C had exchanged phone numbers, they failed to thoroughly investigate the situation by talking with staff who may have knowledge of the incident. CNA-C worked various shifts on multiple units of the facility. This had the potential to effect the entire census of 69 residents. *R6's family member expressed a concern to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. There were observations of call lights not being answered for an extended period of time, Director of Nursing (DON)-B expressed concern regarding nurse staffing levels, record review and residents expressing concerns regarding lack of sufficient staff. The facility had low staffing on night shift on 10/1/24 and 10/4/24, while having a census of 74 and 75 residents. R2 did not receive a scheduled shower on 9/26/24 due to short staffing. Findings include: 1.) Surveyor reviewed the facility's night shift schedule for 10/1/24 which documents 1 nurse and 1 CNA for the 100 and 200 units, and 1 nurse and 2 CNAs (with one CNA marked as late) on the 300 and 400 units. Surveyor noted there are 5 staff members (with one CNA coming in late) that are present in the facility on night shift with a census of 75 residents. Surveyor reviewed the facility's night shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 1 resident's resident representative was notified when there was a need to alter medical treatment. R2's POA (Power of Attorney) was not notified when there was a change in R2's pain medication. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Change in Condition of the Resident and reviewed/revised 9/20/2022 under Policy documents A facility should immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is an accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention; a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications); or a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility did not address and resolve grievances conveyed on behalf of 2 (R9 and R12) of 5 residents reviewed for grievances. * On 10/18/2024, a grievance was initiated for R9 related to R9 having concerns with not being checked on night and being double briefed on night shift. Surveyor noted the grievance form documented the grievance was resolved, but R9 continued to express concern to Surveyor of on-going issue and Surveyor observed R9 saturated in urine in the morning on 10/23/2024. * R12 informed Surveyor of concerns that R12 is not getting up before 06:00 AM, as care planned, and has not been updated on a concern R12 voiced regarding a room change discussed with the Facility. Findings include: The Facility's policy, titled Grievance Policy, with a last reviewed date of 07/2022, documents in part, POLICY the facility will seek to resolve concerns, complaints or grievances and provide residents, reasonable parties, staff and others feedback and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their admissions policy was followed for 1 resident (R16) of 1 residents reviewed. * R16 was admitted on [DATE] and did not sign the admission agreement within 48 hours which includes but not limited to: consent to treat, financial agreement, and resident rights. Findings Include: The facility's admission Policy implemented 10/1/18 and last revised on 11/1/23 documents: Policy : All facilities must follow the policy and procedures for all admissions to mitigate bad debt risk. The admission process sets the precedent for all the billing and collection process. The Executive Director will delegate the admission process to the appropriate individual(based on staffing pattern of the facility). This individual must ensure that both clinical and financial assessments are completed before any admission decision. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines admission Agreement The Admissions Designee, will ensure the admission agreement and Alternative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R16) of 16 Residents reviewed had a comprehensive care plan that was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team as determined by the Resident's assessed needs. R16's care plan was not revised to accurately identify R16's at risk for pressure areas/skin impairments, the need for a toileting plan, and discharge planning interventions. Findings Include: 1.) R16's admission Minimum Data Set(MDS) completed on 9/23/24 documents R16 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score of 15, indicating R16 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. R16's MDS documents R16 had no range of motion impairments. R16 was independent for eating. R16 required substantial/maximum assistance for shower/bathing, lower dressing, personal hygiene, rolling left to right, and sit to lying. R16 required partial/moderate assistance for upper dressing. R16 was dependent for sit to stand, transferring from chair to bed, and toileting transfers. R16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement an effective discharge planning process focusing on resident discharge goal, preparation for transition and reduction in factors leading to preventable readmission for 1 resident (R16) of 1 residents reviewed for discharge planning. * The facility did not complete the admission process for R16 and/or representative including explaining R16's available benefits at time of admission detailing that R16 would either need to private pay as of 10/18/24, or the facility would need to assist R16 with an effective discharge plan for 10/18/24. R16 was notified at 8:45 AM on 10/17/24 the option of private pay or discharge home effective 10/18/24. R16 chose to discharge home on [DATE]. Findings Include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy implemented June 2017 and last revised on 7/15/22 documents: Anticipated Transfers or Discharges-initiated by the Resident a. Obtain physicians' orders for transfer or discharge and instructions or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary ADL (Activities of Daily Living) services for 3 (R7, R11, and R13) of 17 residents who were dependent on staff to provide ADL care. R7 is dependent for bathing and R7 did not receive showers on 9/8/24 and 9/15/24. R11 is dependent for bathing and R11 received 2 showers for the month of September 2024. R13 is dependent for continence care and did not receive continence care multiple times in July 2024. Findings include: 1.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that includes hemiplegia, anxiety, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, dementia, reduced mobility, and speech deficits following cerebral infarction. R7 is dependent on staff for bathing, transferring, and toileting. Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record which documents R7 did not receive a shower on 9/8/24 and 9/15/24. Surveyor could not locate any not documentation of R7 declining a shower on 9/8/24 or 9/15/24. R11 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with urinary incontinence were comprehensively assessed to receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications and restore continence to the extent possible for 1 (R16) of 1 Resident reviewed for incontinence. * A bladder assessment and care plan with person centered interventions was not implemented when R16's urinary continence declined from occasionally incontinent to frequently incontinent. Findings Include: 1.) R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 9/23/24 documents R16 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score of 15, indicating R16 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. R16's MDS documents R16 had no range of motion impairments. R16 was independent for eating. R16 required substantial/maximum assistance for shower/bathing, lower dressing, personal hygiene, rolling left to right, and sit to lying. R16 required partial/moderate assistance for upper dressing. R16 was dependent for sit to stand, transferring from chair to bed, and toileting transfers. R16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure therapy services were provided in a timely manner for 2 (R4 and R16) of 2 residents reviewed for therapy services. *R4 returned to the facility on 7/25/24 after receiving Cortisone (a steroid medication that can help with pain and inflammation) injections to both knees. R4's orthopedic doctor advised that R4 should start Physical Therapy (PT). R4 did not start PT until 9/5/24. *R16 did not receive a home evaluation before discharge. Findings include: 1.) On 10/23/24 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor was informed by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A that the facility does not have a policy for the communication process between staff and the therapy department, for the timing of therapy services, or for the process of home evaluations. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes Stroke, Type 2 Diabetes and Osteoarthritis of the left knee and Bilateral (both sides) knee arthritis. R4's Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide a written notice of transfer, including the reason for transfer and appeal rights to the resident, and their representatives, at the time of transfer from the facility. This was observed with 7 (R49, R51, R58, R3, R4, R55, R75) of 7 residents reviewed for transfers. * R49 was transferred to the hospital on 2/3/24 and was not provided a written notice of the transfer including reason for the transfer and appeal rights. * R51 was transferred to the hospital on 4/5/24 and was not provided a written notice of transfer including reason for the transfer and appeal rights. * R58 was transferred to the hospital on 6/15/24 and was not provided a written notice of transfer including reason for the transfer and appeal rights. * R3 was transferred to the hospital on 5/16/24 and was not provided a written notice of transfer including reason for the transfer and appeal rights. * R4 was transferred to the hospital on 5/7/24 and was not provided a written notice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide the written bed-hold requirements to the resident, or their representatives, at the time of transfer from the facility. This was observed with 5 (R49, R51, R58, R55, R75) of 7 resident transfers reviewed. * R49 was transferred to the hospital on 2/3/24 and was not provided the written bed-hold notification. * R51 was transferred to the hospital on 4/5/24 and was not provided the written bed-hold notification. * R58 was transferred to the hospital on 6/15/24 and was not provided the written bed-hold notification. * R55 was transferred to the hospital on 5/4/24 and was not provided the written bed-hold notification. * R75 was transferred to the hospital on 4/21/24 and was not provided the written bed-hold notification. Findings include: On 6/18/24, at 2:09 PM, Surveyor spoke with (Director of Nurses) DON-B. DON-B indicated the facility does not have a policy and procedure for written bed-hold notification requirements. DON-B informed Surveyor the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's record reflected the accurate resuscitation code status election for 1 (R8) of 18 residents reviewed for code status. R8's hospital discharge paperwork dated [DATE] and facility admission documentation completed on [DATE], indicated R8 elected a full code status. On [DATE] R8's medical record documented a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) MD (medical doctor) order. After the facility conducted a meeting with R8's POA (power of attorney)-K, R8's code status was changed to a full code and a new full code MD order was placed in R8's medical record on [DATE] per R8's POA-K wishes. On [DATE], R8's code status was changed to DNR. R8's progress notes continue to document R8 is a full code despite the signed paperwork and active MD order for DNR. Findings include: R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include Chronic kidney disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type 2 Diabetes, and Dementia. R8's Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 1 (R7) of 8 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R7 was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital on 7/19/2023, with a stage 2 pressure injury to the coccyx. The facility did not complete a comprehensive assessment of the pressure injury including measurements and a description of the wound bed documented upon re-admission. R7 had 2 additional re-admissions to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] and 10/12/2023. The facility did not complete a comprehensive assessment of the pressure injury with measurements and description of the wound bed documented upon readmission for these two additional re-admissions. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries, dated 7/20/2022 documents: Policy:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 (R3) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. * R3 fell from bed while receiving cares due to bed frame not being extended to accommodate mattress size. R3 has bed rails attached to frame but there is no maintenance plan in place by facility for inspection after installation. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Bed Maintenance and Inspections Policy Date Implemented: 6/16/2022, states in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Maintenance Director, or designee, is responsible for keeping records of bed inspections and maintenance. 2. Bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails will be maintained, including the manufacturer for each . 3. The Maintenance Director shall review each manufacturer's recommendations and requirements for maintenance and bed inspections, and shall establish a maintenance and inspection schedule accordingly . 6. Bed frame, mattress,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight for 1 of 2 (R69) residents reviewed for weight loss. R69 was not weighed as ordered. R69 sustained severe weight loss over a period of less than 2 months. Neither the Physician, nor the Dietician was notified and no new interventions were implemented. R69 continued to lose weight with no Physician or Dietician notification and no new interventions were implmented until an additional month later. Findings include: R69 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Aphasia, Dysarthria, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Hyperlipidemia. The facility policy titled Weight Monitoring revised 12/21/22 documents (in part) . . The interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight change for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R27) of 3 residents was provided with pain management consistent with professional standards of practice. R27 reported being in constant pain. The facility did not identify R27 was assessed to have a significant worsening of pain effecting R27's quality of life while conducting R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Pain assessments on 5/13/24. R27 was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R27 did not have an order for scheduled Tylenol order from 5/9/2024 through 6/3/2024 or Tramadol which was in place prior to R27's hospitalization. The facility did not address the potential for R27 to experience increased pain with the change in pain medication orders. R27's Physician Assistant's (PA) documentation indicated R27 was getting Physical therapy (PT) and Occupation therapy (OT) to help with pain management. R27 was not receiving PT or OT to help with pain management. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Registered Pharmacist consult recommendations were acted upon promptly, and relayed to the required staff. This was observed with 2 (R58 and R3) of 5 resident medication reviews. * R58 and R3 had Registered Pharmacist (RPH) medication regimen review recommendations that were not relayed to the Physician, Medical Director and Director of Nurses, promptly. Findings include: The Facility policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements dated 01/23 documents (in part): Procedures 4 . c. Review and follow-up to previous month's pharmacy recommendations with the nursing care center staff d. Medication Regimen Reviews (MMR) for each Skilled Nursing (SNF) resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions, incorporating the federally mandated standards of care in addition to other applicable professional standards. e. Communicate to the responsible prescriber, the facility's medical director and the director of nursing potential or actual problems detected and other findings related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and including labeling drugs and biologicals with the expiration date when applicable. This was observed with 2 (R45 and R55) of 2 residents reviewed who receive insulin. R45 and R55 each had 2 open insulin pens in their respective medication cart that were not labeled with an open or use by date. Findings include: The Facility policy titled Medication Administration Subcutaneous Insulin dated 01/23 documents (in part): Procedures .Drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. 6. Date vial or device after first use . On 06/19/24, at 12:56 PM, Surveyor was completing a review of the medication cart located on the 100 hallway east. R55 had insulin pens of insulin glargine and latanoprost of which neither had an open date or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 10 sampled residents (Resident (R) 1) was fully informed of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment options and was given the right to choose her preferred option when her antibiotic regimen was altered. Findings include: Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) Medical Diagnoses tab revealed R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/12/24. Review of R1's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/12/24, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of R1's EMR Orders'' tab revealed an order for vancomycin hydrochloride (HCL), an antibiotic, oral capsule 125 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time every other day for Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) for 14 days. It was recorded that the antibiotic was started on 01/29/24 and discontinued on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when multiple administrations of antibiotics and probiotics to treat a recurrent Clostridioides difficile [C. diff, a bacterial infection known to cause diarrhea and colitis (inflammation of the colon)] were not available for administration for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident (R) 1). This delayed the physician from altering R1's course of treatment when a new antibiotic course was not initiated. Findings include: Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) Medical Diagnoses tab revealed R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/12/24. Review of R1's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/12/24, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of R1's EMR Progress Notes tab revealed: 1. On 12/13/23 at 3:47 AM, R1 had tested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 10 sampled residents (Resident (R) 6) who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when R6 missed four of five showers during her admission to the facility. Findings include: Review of R6's undated Medical Diagnoses tab, located in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R6 was admitted to the facility from 11/13/23 to 11/29/23 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified. Review of R6's admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/20/23, located in the EMR MDS tab, revealed R6 was assessed as requiring partial to moderate assistance with showers, having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 (indicating moderately impaired cognition), and no rejections of care during the lookback period. Review of R6's Documentation Survey Report v2 [version 2], provided by the facility for November 2023 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident (R) 1). R1 missed multiple administrations of antibiotics and probiotics to treat a recurrent Clostridioides difficile [C. diff, a bacterial infection known to cause diarrhea and colitis (inflammation of the colon)]. Findings include: Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) Medical Diagnoses tab revealed R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/12/24. Review of R1's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/12/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of R1's EMR Progress Notes tab revealed: 1. On 12/13/23 at 3:47 AM, R1 had tested positive for C. diff. R1 was started on vancomycin, an antibiotic, four times a day for 10 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record accurately reflected the resident's refusals to be weighed and physician notification of weight changes for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident (R) 5). Findings include: Review of R5's Medical Diagnoses tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/27/24 with diagnoses including chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of R5's care plan, provided by the facility, revealed a focus for rejections of care, initiated on 02/07/24, with interventions including use consistent approaches when given care. Review of R5's EMR Orders'' tab revealed an order dated 02/08/24 for daily weights to be completed and for the physician to be notified of a weight gain of more than two pounds in 24 hours or more than five pounds in one week related to congestive heart failure. Review of R5's EMR Medication Administration Record (MAR), from the Orders tab for January…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure allegations involving potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for 3 Residents (R1, R7, and R10) of 3 Residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. * On 9/29/23, an allegation of abuse involving R1 was reported to Director of Nursing(DON-B), but was not thoroughly investigated by the facility. * Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA)-E reported to nurses that R7 was upset and tearful because R7 was being forced to go to bed when R7 did not want to and the facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation. The accused CNA-C was allowed to continue to work with other residents with no provision as to how the facility would protect other residents from potential further abuse. *On 9/3/23, an allegation of abuse involving R10 was reported to DON-B and Administrator(NHA-A), but was not thoroughly investigated by the facility. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy and procedure revised 7/15/22 and notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 allegations of mistreatment or abuse involving 3 Residents (R1, R7, and R10) were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency. * On 9/29/23, an allegation of abuse involving R1 was reported to Director of Nursing (DON-B), but was not reported to the State Survey Agency. * Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA-E) reported to nurses that R7 was upset and tearful because R7 was being forced to go to bed when R7 did not want to. * On 9/3/23, an allegation of abuse involving R10 was reported to DON-B and Administrator (NHA-A), but was not reported to the State Survey Agency. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy and procedure revised 7/15/22 and notes the following in regards to reporting: .IV. Identification of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation A. The facility will have written procedures to assist staff in identifying the different types of abuse-mental/verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility did not maintain records that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (R9) of 2 residents reviewed who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the facility. * R9 received CPR after a cardiac arrest on [DATE] and nothing about the event was documented in R9's medical record. Findings include: R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Malignant Neoplasm of the Pancreas. On [DATE] Director of Nurses (DON)-B provided a list of residents who received CPR in the facility that included R9. On [DATE] R9's medical record was reviewed and no entries regarding R9's change of condition or need for CPR were documented in the medical record. On [DATE] at 9:00 AM DON-B was interviewed and indicated on [DATE] at about 2:30 PM R9 stopped breathing and Registered Nurse (RN)-J called a code and started CPR. CPR was continued until paramedics got there and paramedics were able to get a pulse and transferred R9 to the hospital where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not have a practice of monitoring and documenting food holding temperatures. Findings include: The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code 2022 documents at section 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding .Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food shall be maintained: (1) At 57°Celsius (C) (135°Fahrenheit (F) or above, except that roast cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in 3-401.11 (B) or reheated as specified in 3-403.11 (E) may be held at a temperature of 54°C (130°F) or above; (2) At 5°C (41°F) or less. In a January 2001 report, the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF) recommended the minimum hot holding temperature specified in the Food Code: Be greater than the upper limit of the range of temperatures at which Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure food was served at a palatable temperature and was appetizing for 9 Residents (R) (R8, R17, R1, R54, R56 R175, R176, R24, and R15) of 12 residents. R8, R17, R54, R56, R1, R176, R24, and R15 stated their meals were not served at a palatable temperature and/or the food was not appetizing. In addition, R175's lunch meal contained items that were warm, lukewarm and cool to taste. Findings include: On 4/10/23 at 10:15 AM, Surveyor interviewed R8 who stated the food is not always hot and appealing. R8 further stated that even when sitting in the dining room, the food is served lukewarm, the vegetables are often mushy and the coffee is served cold. R8 verified dining staff reheat the food if asked; however, R8 stated R8 no longer asks because when the food is reheated, it doesn't come back as hot and is just as cold. On 4/10/23 at 11:31 AM, Surveyor interviewed R17 who stated the food is bad. R17 stated R17 does not always receive foods that are requested, the food is not served hot, and R17 is served menu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate administration of medication for 3 Residents (R) (R15, R7 and R21) of 5 residents reviewed. R15 did not consistently receive pain medication timely as ordered by R15's physician. R7 did not consistently receive medication timely as ordered by R7's physician. R21 did not consistently receive medication timely as ordered by R21's physician. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration General Guidelines policy, dated 1/2023, contained the following information: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturer's specifications, good nursing principles and practices .14. Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time .Unless otherwise specified by the prescriber, routine medications are administered according to the established medication administration schedule for the nursing care center . 1. On 4/10/23, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include recent right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R45) of 5 residents was monitored for the effectiveness and potential side effects of psychotropic medications. R45 was admitted with diagnoses that required use of multiple psychotropic medications. The facility did not monitor for the effectiveness or potential side effects of the medications. Findings include: The facility's Medication Error Reporting and Adverse Drug Reaction Prevention and Detection document, dated January 2023, contained the following information: The facility utilizes a system to assure that medication usage is evaluated on an ongoing basis .refer to State regulations if medication error and adverse reaction reporting programs are legislated .Facility staff monitor the resident for possible medication-related adverse consequences .Evaluation of resident's side effects of medications, including sedation, lethargy, agitation, mental status changes or behaviors .The facility staff monitors residents for possible adverse consequences and/or the need to modify the dose of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure it was free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater. During medication administration observations, 4 errors occurred during 28 opportunities which resulted in a 14.29% medication error rate affecting 2 Residents (R) (R7 and R21) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. R7 had physician orders for Baclofen (a muscle relaxant) 10 mg (milligram) tablet four times a day scheduled at 7:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 3:00 PM and 7:00 PM, Tizanidine (a muscle relaxant) 3 mg tablets three times a day scheduled at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 8:00 PM, and Eliquis (used to prevent blood clots) 5 mg tablet two times a day scheduled at 8:00 AM and 7:00 PM. During an observation of medication administration, Surveyor noted R7's AM medications were not administered until 11:20 AM. R21 had a physician order for Eliquis 5 mg tablet two times a day scheduled at 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. During an observation of medication administration, Surveyor noted R21's 7:00 AM dose of Eliquis was not administered until 11:26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during a care observation for 1 Resident (R) (37) of 2 sampled residents with an indwelling catheter. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene during an observation of care for R37. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 11/2/22, contained the following information: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Definitions: Hand Hygiene is a general term for cleaning your hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). When to wash or sanitize hands. * Before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves. * After handling contaminated objects. * Before performing resident care procedures. * After assistance with personal body functions (e.g. elimination). R37 was admitted to facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$120,868 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $16,985 — penalty dated 2025-03-12
  • $103,883 — penalty dated 2024-11-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-04 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Elroy Health ServicesElroy, WI 1 of 5Florence Health ServicesFlorence, WI 1 of 5Hopkins Restorative Care CenterHopkins, MN 1 of 5La Crescent Health ServicesLa Crescent, MN 1 of 5Little Chute Health ServicesLittle Chute, WI 1 of 5Minot Health And Rehab, LLCMinot, ND 1 of 5Plymouth Health ServicesPlymouth, WI 1 of 5Rochester Restorative Care CenterRochester, MN 1 of 5Sheboygan Progressive Health ServicesSheboygan, WI 1 of 5Williams Bay Health ServicesWilliams Bay, WI 1 of 5Wisconsin Rapids Health ServicesWisconsin Rapids, WI 2 of 5Birch Hill Health ServicesShawano, WI 2 of 5Colonial Health ServicesColby, WI 2 of 5Evergreen Health ServicesShawano, WI 2 of 5Green Bay Health ServicesGreen Bay, WI 2 of 5Heritage Health ServicesPort Washington, WI 2 of 5Lancaster Health ServicesLancaster, WI 2 of 5Maple Ridge Health ServicesMilwaukee, WI 2 of 5Menomonee Falls Health ServicesMenomonee Falls, WI 2 of 5Mineral Point Health ServicesMineral Point, WI 2 of 5Soldiers Grove Health ServicesSoldiers Grove, WI 2 of 5Stevens Point Health ServicesStevens Point, WI 2 of 5Sunrise Health ServicesMilwaukee, WI 2 of 5Three Oaks Health ServicesMarshfield, WI 2 of 5Tomahawk Health ServicesTomahawk, WI 2 of 5Whitewater Health ServicesSt Charles, MN 2 of 5Willowcrest Health ServicesSouth Milwaukee, WI 3 of 5Cedarburg Health ServicesCedarburg, WI 3 of 5Court Manor Health ServicesAshland, WI 3 of 5Hayward Health ServicesHayward, WI 3 of 5Homestead Health ServicesNew Holstein, WI 3 of 5Mercy Health ServicesMilwaukee, WI 3 of 5Morningside Health ServicesSheboygan, WI 3 of 5Oakwood Health ServicesAltoona, WI 3 of 5Randolph Health ServicesRandolph, WI 3 of 5Rib Lake Health ServicesRib Lake, WI 3 of 5River's Bend Health ServicesManitowoc, WI 3 of 5Riverview Health ServicesTomahawk, WI 3 of 5Sheboygan Health ServicesSheboygan, WI 3 of 5St Francis Health ServicesSaint Francis, WI

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NSHF OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/24/2017
MILLS, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/29/2017
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/03/2025
BAUMANN, TROYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/29/2017
HOEHN, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/29/2017
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
CONTINUUM THERAPY PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
NSH REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
BELONGIA, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2019
GEE, DARRENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/30/2021
GREER, LAURENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/29/2023
HAMM, CARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
PATZER, COLLEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2023
PURTELL, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2018
RAMNANAN, KESHNIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CANYON WOH, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2022
NSHW WISCONSIN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$493K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 32%Medicare 13%Other / private 55%

This home reported $493K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,978per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525702. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next