Hayward Health Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 33.5 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure a resident's (R) advanced directives for code status were implemented according to resident wishes for 1 of 14 residents (R) 35 reviewed for advanced directives. R35 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order signed by R35 on [DATE] and signed by the physician on [DATE]. On [DATE], R35 became unresponsive requiring the invoking of R35's code status. Staff was unable to find the advanced directives and code status for R35 and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Despite R35 indicating the intent to not receive CPR, R35 was provided CPR on [DATE]. R35 did not survive the code status and was pronounced deceased following the event. The facility's failure to follow a resident's advanced directive created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE] at 6:30 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 10:45 a.m. The immediate jeopardy was not removed when the surveyors left the facility at 4:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not have a system in place to ensure snack/nourishment refrigerators on the unit are maintained to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. The facility practices had the potential to affect all 33 residents. Per facility guidelines attached to resident refrigerator titled Attention all residents and family members, We are happy to provide a refrigerator to our resident's food that you provide for them outside of the facility. However, there are new specific guidelines that we need to enforce for the protection of all of our residents. It stated in part, Any food placed in the resident refrigerator must be clearly marked with the resident name and dated with a new USED BY DATE. On 12/17/2025 at 9:35 AM, Surveyor observed a plastic container with sliced vegetables and labeled with R33's name and dated 12/09/25 stored in resident refrigerator located in dining room. On 12/17/2025 at 9:43 AM, Surveyor interviewed Kitchen District Manager J regarding outdated container of vegetables located in resident refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility. COVID positive resident (R) did not have a sign outside R door indicating Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) were in place. Facility staff did not don and doff Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately. Staff did not sanitize hands or place a barrier while providing nebulizer care. Clean linens were not covered for two of carts in the facility's laundry room and personnel had open beverage in work area touching clean gown used to handle clean linen. Findings include: Example 1 State Operations Manual, Implementation of Transmission-Based Precautions reads in part, .When a resident is placed on transmission-based precautions, facility staff should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that every resident was treated with dignity and respect when providing activities of daily living (ADL) for 2 of 12 residents (R7 and R29) reviewed. During one observation of a nebulizer treatment provided to R7, the nurse providing cares did not speak to R7 or explain what procedure they were going to provide.During one observation of insulin administration provided to R29, the nurse providing the administration did not speak or explain what procedure nurse was going to provide to R29 and did not remove R29 from the dining prior to administering insulin. This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Residents Rights, dated reviewed on July 2022 states in part: .Residents will be treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident will be given in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life and recognizes each resident's individuality. Example 1R7 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R7) of sampled 12 residents has the right to retain personal possessions, including furnishings, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents.Facility did not allow R7 to have personal refrigerator in R7's room.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Residents Rights, dated reviewed on July 2022 states in part: .Resident has the right to retain personal possessions, including furnishings, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents.R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, non-pressure ulcer of right calf limited to breakdown of skin, morbidly obese, schizoaffective disorder, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, post traumatic disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that every resident has the right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that are significant to them for 1 of 12 residents (R7) residents reviewed for choices. R7 requests to staff that R7 wants to smoke outside, and facility has refused to take R7 out due to staffing issues or too busy. Findings include:Facility policy titled, Smoking, dated reviewed on 05/09/2019, states in part: .Procedure: #11. For supervised smokers: b. A smoking schedule will be developed to provide supervision for dependent smokers. Dependent smokers will be assisted during these times.R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, non-pressure ulcer of right calf limited to breakdown of skin, morbidly obese, schizoaffective disorder, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, post traumatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident (R) received treatment and care to address the resident's mobility needs in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for mobility, range of motion, and/or positioning (R2).The facility did not provide services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in mobility for R2, who required assistance with ambulation. Findings include:R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 5 chronic kidney disease, unsteadiness on feet, and weakness. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 12/2/25, indicated R2 scored 10/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognition. MDS assessment also indicated R2 required use of a walker, supervision and touch assistance with ambulation. R2's care plan, last revised on 11/27/24, stated R2 will walk with assistance of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with a pressure injury received care necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (23).R23's care plan interventions of repositioning to heal and prevent worsening of a pressure injury were not implemented.R23's physician orders to treat a pressure injury were not implemented. The facility policy titled, Turning and Repositioning, dated 12/06/22 states: It is our policy to implement turning and repositioning as part of our systematic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. This policy establishes responsibilities and protocols for turning and repositioning. The policy further identifies Explanation and Compliance Guidelines in part .:1. Facility residents at risk of, or with existing pressure injuries, will be turned and repositioned, unless it is contraindicated due to a medical condition. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed who required oxygen and respiratory care was provided such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan, and physician orders (R7). Findings include:Example 1R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease (COPD), pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, non-pressure ulcer of right calf limited to breakdown of skin, morbidly obese, schizoaffective disorder, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, post traumatic disorder, and presence of left artificial knee joint. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/14/19, identified on admission that R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15. This indicated R7 had intact cognition. The MDS assessment also identified R7 required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 5 residents (R29) reviewed.Facility failed to discontinue Trazadone for R29 after pharmacy recommended R29 to discontinue if no sleep concerns. Findings include:R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, in part, Parkinsonism, dysphagia, abnormalities with gait and mobility, unsteady on feet, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage 1-4. R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/02/25, identified on admission that R29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04/15. This indicated R29 had severe impaired cognition. MDS on 12/02/25 states no behaviors noted. Surveyor reviewed R29's physician orders, which state in part, Trazodone HCl Oral Tablet (Trazodone HCl) -Give 25 mg by mouth at bedtime for insomnia related to depression. Antidepressant medication - observe for sedation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less for 2 of 6 residents (R), R25 and R15, observed for medication pass. The facility had 31 opportunities and 3 medication errors resulting in an 9.68% error rate. Registered Nurse (RN) L administered Atropine drops sublingual to R25 with unknown open date. RN E administered insulin pen without checking the expiration date and the correct physician order for R15.This is evidenced by:According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), insulin pens should be discarded 28 days after opening the pen to ensure effectiveness of the medication.Example 1On 12/16/2025 at 8:33 AM, Surveyor observed RN L administer medications to R25. RN L administered Atropine drops sublingual. Surveyor observed Atropine bottle to have no open date label, so expiration was unknown resulting in a medication error. On 12/16/25 at 8:11 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN L and asked RN L what the correct process is for checking labels and expirations before administering medications. RN L looked at Atropine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,649 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,649 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $229K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI