Williams Bay Health Services
146 Clover St, Williams Bay, WI 53191 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (262) 245-6400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 5.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 37.2% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 35.3% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.8% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.1% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.2% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.13 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.0%CMS range 42.3–75.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.1–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 32.1 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R14) of 2 sampled residents with pressure injuries received the necessary care and treatment based upon standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries from developing, promote healing, and prevent new areas from developing.R14 developed an abrasion to her right buttock 13 days after admission. The abrasion deteriorated to a Stage 4 pressure injury (PI) requiring hospitalization, surgical debridement, and a wound VAC. The wound became infected requiring antibiotic treatment, 2 different times. Surveyor's observations of wound care completed by facility staff identified concerns with infection control and care plan interventions not being implemented or in place.The facility's failure to provide care and treatment to a resident who was at risk for pressure injuries and developed a wound that deteriorated to a stage 4 pressure injury requiring antibiotics for infection, hospitalization, surgical debridement, and a wound vac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 4 (R20, R34, R32 and R24) of 4 sampled residents had services that prevented accident hazards. On [DATE] R34 had an unwitnessed fall and was sent to the hospital R34. R34 sustained a left intertrochanter fracture. On [DATE] R20 had an unwitnessed fall and was sent to the hospital. R20 sustained a zygomatic arch (cheek bone) fracture. On [DATE] and [DATE] R32 was observed to be drinking with a straw in her sippy cup. R32 had been assessed and care planned they should not drink through a straw due to swallowing concerns. On [DATE], R24 was overheard by staff calling a physician office and asking for an appointment. When staff asked if R24 needed assistance and why they needed the appointment R24 replied to get an order for a gun to shoot herself with. The facility did not implement interventions to maintain R24's safety. Additionally, R24 was determined to be at risk for falls on admission to the facility. R24 sustained 10 unwitnessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R26 and R29) of 2 residents reviewed received adequate supervision, interventions to prevent accidents. * On 02/12/2025, R26 sustained an injury during a transfer resulting in a skin tear to left lower leg requiring R26 to go to the emergency room where Steri-Strips were applied to R26's wound. On 03/03/2025, R26 reinjured R26's left lower leg during a transfer which caused bleeding and R26 was prescribed an antibiotic for Cellulitis. On 03/26/2025, Surveyor observed staff improperly transfer R26. *There was no quarterly smoking assessment for R29 on a quarterly basis. Findings Include: The facility's policy, titled NSG-Safe Resident Handling and transfers, with a last reviewed date of 05/05/2022, documents: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety (Wisconsin Food Code) in the main kitchen. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 33 residents who receive food from the main kitchen. *Three opened cardboard boxes containing cookie dough, turkey breast, and orange juice were observed resting directly on the floor in the walk-in freezer in the main kitchen. Findings include:The Wisconsin Food Code documents to prevent contamination from the premises, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food in a clean, dry location, where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and at least 6 inches above the floor. On 5/19/26 at 8:09 AM, Surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's main kitchen. Surveyor observed three opened cardboard boxes resting directly on the floor of the walk-in freezer. One cardboard box contained cookie dough, one cardboard box contained turkey breast, and one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement policies and procedures for feedback, data collections systems, and monitoring, including adverse event monitoring to develop activities to prevent adverse events potentially affecting 33 of 33 residents in the facility. The facility did not develop written documentation of performance improvement activities to facilitate the identification of facility-wide problems, devise plans to address the identified issues, and have a system to monitor the effectiveness of those plans and revise as needed. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 7/11/2022 documents: QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) is the coordinated application of two mutually reinforcing aspects of a quality management system: Quality Assurance (QA) and Performance Improvement (PI). QAPI takes a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents, families, and all nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 8 of 8 direct & non-direct staff chosen at random received behavioral health training.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-OO, Housekeeper-PP, Cook-QQ, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-RR, CNA-SS, CNA-TT, CNA-MM, and CNA-UU did not receive behavioral health training.Findings include:On 6/3/26, at 9:30 a.m., Surveyor requested training for CNA-RR, CNA-SS, CNA-TT, CNA-MM, & CNA-UU.On 6/3/26, at 10:19 a.m., Surveyor requested training for LPN-OO, Housekeeper-PP and Cook-QQOn 6/3/26, at 11:30 a.m., Surveyor reviewed LPN-OO's training. LPN-OO has a hire date of 10/13/23. Surveyor noted LPN-OO has received required training for communication; residents rights & facility's responsibility; abuse, neglect, exploitation; infection control; QAPI (quality assurance performance improvement); and compliance & ethics. Surveyor was unable to locate behavioral health training for LPN-OO.On 6/3/26, at 11:40 a.m., Surveyor reviewed Houskeeper-PP's training. Housekeeper-PP has a hire date of 3/28/25. Surveyor noted Housekeeper-PP received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure implementation of their policies and procedures to prevent abuse. The facility failed to ensure the criminal background checks were completed prior to employment for 4 of 8 employees reviewed potentially affecting a pattern of the 33 facility residents at the time of the survey. *Registered Nurse (RN)-K was hired on 12/1/2019 and the criminal background check was completed 3/2018, 21 months prior to the hire date and not just prior to employment. A second criminal background check was completed 3/2025, 5 years after the hire date. *Life Enrichment (LE)-L was hired on 8/24/2023 and the criminal background check was completed 1/2024, 4 months after the hire date, and the out-of-state background check was completed 11/2024, 15 months after the hire date. *Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-M was hired on 3/14/2024 and the criminal background check was completed 6/2024 and 7/2025, 3-4 months after the hire date. *CNA-N was hired on 7/16/2024 and the criminal background check was completed 10/2025, 15 months after the hire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure licensed nurses had competencies and skill sets necessary to care for diabetic residents requiring insulin was identified with 1 (R30) of 4 sampled residents. *R30 was administered insulin from an insulin pen. Registered Nurse (RN)-P did not administer the insulin as instructed by the manufacturer or to professional standards. Findings include: The Facility Assessment, last reviewed on 4/27/2026, documents: Prospective Admissions:-When a prospective resident has a diagnosis or condition not recently or previously managed by the facility, a comprehensive evaluation will be conducted.-The facility will educate staff on the new condition and validate that their competencies align with the necessary care requirements.-Training will be provided to ensure staff can effectively manage the conditions within their licensed scope of practice.Current Residents:-If a current resident presents with a new diagnosis or condition that the facility has not recently or previously supported, the same process of staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a sanitary environment for 3 (R4, R14, and R28) of 13 sampled residents and potentially affecting any resident eating in the dining room. *R4 was administered oral medications by Registered Nurse (RN)-P. RN-P touched every pill with bare hands before putting them in the medicine cup. *R14 had a dressing change done to a wound by RN-O where hand hygiene was not performed during the treatment and RN-P provided incontinence care to R14 without performing hand hygiene between dirty and clean areas and touched items in R14's room without performing hand hygiene. *R28 was in enhanced barrier precautions and staff did not don gowns prior to performing cares on R28 and no hand hygiene was performed after incontinence care. *An uncovered rack of unclaimed clothing was observed in the dining room throughout the survey. Findings include: 1.)The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration Orals dated 1/2023 documents: 7. Pour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure pneumonia immunizations were offered to residents affecting 4 (R4, R17, R20, And R22) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for pneumonia immunizations. *R4 was not current in their pneumococcal vaccination, and no vaccine was offered. *R17 was not current in their pneumococcal vaccination, and no vaccine was offered. *R20 was not current in their pneumococcal vaccination, and no vaccine was offered. *R22 was not current in their pneumococcal vaccination, and no vaccine was offered. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) dated 3/25/2025 documents: 1. Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission. Self-report of immunization shall be accepted. Any additional efforts to obtain information shall be documented, including efforts to determine date of immunization or type of vaccine received. 2. Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization unless it is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. Following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a resident's physician was consulted with for 1 (R28) of 13 residents reviewed. *The Facility did not ensure the physician was notified/consulted after R28 reported mild knee pain to Physical Therapy on 1/29/2026. R28 continued to experience left knee swelling and the physician was not notified until 2/12/2026. Findings include: The Facility policy, titled Change in Condition of the Resident, last review/revised on 9/20/2022, indicates . a.Immediate notification: Immediate notification for any symptom, sign or apparent discomfort that is:i. Acute or sudden onset, and:ii. A marked change (i.e., more severe in relation to usual symptoms and signs, . b. Non-immediate notification R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for therapy services focused on strengthening following a hospital stay with influenza. R28 was a stand to pivot assistance at home prior to hospitalization. R8 was admitted with diagnoses including weakness, multiple sclerosis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R14) of 15 sampled residents were provided with privacy during treatments/cares. On 5/20/26 at 10:25 a.m. Surveyor observed R14 receive wound treatment to the right buttock. During the treatment, R14's window blinds were not closed and the window faced the outside where people could possibly walk by and observe R14 receiving care. Findings include: R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, deaf and quadriplegia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R14 is cognitively intact and is dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL), transfers and bed mobility. It also documents R14 is incontinent of bladder and bowel. On 5/20/26 at 10:25 a.m. Surveyor observed R14's pressure injury treatment being completed to their right buttock. Registered Nurse (RN)-O performed the treatment while RN-P assisted with holding R14 on her left side. R14's window blinds were not closed prior to or during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 (R4, and R30) of 13 sampled residents. *R4 had a large hole in R4's wall in R4's room on the right side.*R30 had a large amount of paint missing on R30's wall on the right side. Findings include: 1) R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus(adult onset of trouble controlling blood sugar), Anxiety Disorder(mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, fear that interfere with daily activities), and Schizophrenia(chronic brain disorder characterized by distortions in thinking, perception, emotions, and behavior).R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/12/26, indicated that R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 11, which indicated that R4 demonstrated moderately impaired skills for daily decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R32) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for potential abuse concerns had their allegations reported to the state agency. On 5/1/26 a bump with bruising was discovered on R32's right forehead. The area measured 1.9 centimeters (cm) by 4.0 cm. R32 was unable to state what happened so an investigation was initiated. This potential allegation was not reported to the state agency. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 7/15/22 documents: Reporting/Response1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure written notice of the facility bed hold policy was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative. Proper transfer/discharge information was also not sent to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 (R7, R8, & R22) of 7 residents reviewed for transfers or discharges. *R7 was hospitalized on [DATE]. A written copy of R7's bed hold notice was not sent to R7's representative, and the facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of R7's transfer to the hospital. *R8 was hospitalized on [DATE] and 3/21/26. A written copy of R8's bed hold notice was not sent to R8's representative, and the facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of R8's transfer to the hospital on 3/21/26.*R22 was hospitalized on [DATE]. The facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of R22's transfer to the hospital. Findings include: The facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) (against medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan based upon an assessment for 1 (R14) of 15 sampled residents.*R14's was assessed as needing side rails on their bed. R14's care plan did not include R14's use of side rails as part of their care plan.Findings include:The Facility's policy, titled Comprehensive Care Plan, with a last review/revised date of 9/23/2022, indicates . 2. The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment . 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences and align with the resident's cultural identity, as indicated. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy and quadriplegia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided for 1 (R37) of 13 residents observed for call light wait times in order to allow residents to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. *On 5/20/26, Surveyor observed R37's call light go unanswered for 35 minutes when R37 needed assistance with toileting. Findings include:The facility policy titled . Call lights: Accessibility and Timey Response dated 7/26/22 documents: . The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. all staff who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate personnel should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R28) of 13 residents (R) received necessary care and treatment.* R28 experienced changes in their left lower extremity that included, swelling, pain, and decrease in strength. The facility staff documented about R28 having increased swelling but a thorough assessment was not completed. Consistent monitoring did not occur. On 2/12/26 a doppler ultrasound was ordered which ruled out a possible blood clot. An x-ray of the knee was not ordered until 2/20/26 which indicated a possible fracture of the knee. This was confirmed by a second x-ray. Findings include: 1.) R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for therapy services for strengthening following a hospital stay with influenza. R28 was a stand to pivot assistance at home prior to hospitalization. R28 was admitted with diagnoses including weakness, multiple sclerosis (a chronic, unpredictable autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system,) and dementia (a decline in mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R28) of 2 residents with a urostomy received appropriate treatment & care.*R28 was admitted to the Facility with a urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an alternate route for urine to leave your body when the bladder is removed or malfunctioning). The Facility did not have the proper supplies to care for R28's urostomy needs.Findings include:R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for therapy services and strengthening following a hospital stay with influenza. R28 was admitted with diagnoses including weakness, multiple sclerosis (a chronic, unpredictable autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system), urinary tract infection, dementia (a decline in mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life) and acquired absence of other parts of the urinary tract.R28's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R28 had an indwelling catheter and an ostomy (urostomy).Surveyor reviewed R28's electronic health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not comprehensively assess 3 (R22, R24, and R30) of 3 sampled Residents for traumas and develop care plan approaches ensure provision of trauma informed care to mitigate any triggers to prevent re-traumatization.* R22's psychology progress note dated [DATE] identify' s R22 as having military service with deployment. The facility did not complete a comprehensive trauma assessment to develop and implement an individualized trauma informed plan of care.*R24's trauma informed care assessment dated [DATE] was incomplete with 8 questions not answered. The facility did not complete a comprehensive trauma assessment to develop and implement an individualized trauma informed plan of care.*R30 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The facility did not complete a comprehensive trauma assessment to develop and implement an individualized trauma informed plan of care.Findings include:The facility's Trauma Informed Care policy &…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents received the necessary behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 3 (R2, R24, and R30) of 5 sampled Residents reviewed for mood concerns.*R2 expressed the need to receive in-person psychotherapy and psychotherapy was not initiated by the facility.*R24 expressed suicidal ideation on 2/2/26. No documentation was found that a suicidal evaluation was completed. The physician was not notified, or a Care Plan was not developed to address R24's suicidal ideation.*R30 expressed the need to receive in-person psychotherapy and psychotherapy was not initiated by the facility.Findings include:On 5/26/2026, at 1:31 PM, Surveyor was informed by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A that the facility does not have a policy and procedure for initiating behavioral health care and services.1.R2 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 13 sampled residents reviewed received medically related social services to address individual Resident needs in order to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.*Therapy assessed R2 as needing a bigger wheelchair 10/24/25. R2 attends dialysis 3 times a week and the transportation company stated they would no longer be able to transport R2 to and from dialysis with a bigger wheelchair. R2 has not received the replacement wheelchair and continues to use a wheelchair that is too small and is broken because the facility informed R2 that R2 would need to seek alternative placement to get a bigger chair and continue dialysis. R2 does not want to leave the facility. The facility hasn't actively sought alternatives either for equipment or transportation options to assist R2 to remain in the facility.Findings include:The facility's Medically Related Social Services policy & procedure last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain procedures for acting upon the monthly drug regimen review recommendations for 1 (R7) of 5 residents reviewed.R7's Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review, dated 1/21/26, recommended discontinuing scheduled Benzonatate 100 milligrams (mg) daily and changing it to PRN (as needed). R7's physician approved this recommendation on 2/11/26. R7 continued to receive scheduled Benzonatate 100 mg daily until it was discontinued on 3/4/26.Findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Monitoring . Medication Regimen Review and Reporting dated January 2023 documents: . Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with mediation. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (R7) of 5 residents reviewed.R7's pharmacy medication regimen review dated 1/21/26 recommended R7's order for Benzonatate 100 milligrams (mg) daily be discontinued or changed to as needed (PRN). R7's ordering practitioner response documented OK PRN dated 2/11/26, but R7 continued to receive Benzonatate 100 mg daily until 3/1/26. Findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Monitoring . Medication Regimen Review and Reporting dated January 2023 documents: . Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with mediation. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. For…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R34) of 6 residents reviewed for medications were free from significant medication errors.On 3/17/26 between 7:50 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., R34 received a combination of narcotics, benzodiazepine and muscle relaxers in a short time span and not according to physician orders for the amount and frequency.Findings include:R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD, bipolar disorder and dependent on supplemental oxygen. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R34 had moderate cognitive impairment, needed supervision with dressing, independent with transfers and hygiene. It also documents R34 was independent to walk 10 feet with a walker and 50 feet with supervision. R34 was always continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of bladder.On 3/3/26, R34 was admitted to hospice services due to COPD.On 3/18/26, at 13:16 (1:16 PM) (late entry), R34's medical record documents, Writer walked by room and saw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 2 of 2 non-direct staff chosen at random received QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) training on the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program.Housekeeper-PP and Cook-QQ did not receive QAPI training.Findings include:On 6/3/26, at 10:19 a.m. surveyor requested training for Housekeeper-PP with a hire date of 3/28/25 and Cook-QQ with a hire date of 4/27/21.On 6/3/26, at 11:40 a.m., Surveyor reviewed Houskeeper-PP's training received from date of hire. Surveyor noted Housekeeper-PP received required training for resident rights & responsibility; abuse, neglect, exploitation; infection control, and compliance & ethics. Surveyor was unable to locate when Housekeeper-PP received QAPI training.On 6/3/26, at 11:44 a.m., Surveyor reviewed Cook-QQ's training received during 2025-2026. Surveyor noted that Cook-QQ received required training for resident rights & responsibility; abuse, neglect, exploitation; infection control, and compliance & ethics. Surveyor was unable to locate when Cook-QQ received QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 randomly sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had a current CNA Skills Competency Checklist completed to address areas of weakness.CNA-TT's last CNA Skills Competency Checklist was completed on 1/1/24.Findings include:On 6/3/26, at 9:30 a.m., Surveyor requested competencies for five randomly selected Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) including CNA-TT from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B.CNA-TT date of hire is 5/26/20. On 6/3/26, at 9:42 a.m., Surveyor was provided with CNA-TT's CNA Skills Competency Checklist. Surveyor noted this skills competency was completed on 1/1/24. CNA-TT and Prior DON-JJ signed the CNA skills competency checklist on 1/4/24.On 6/3/26, at 1:33 p.m., Surveyor informed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, Director of Nursing (DON)-B and Senior VP (Vice President) of Clinical Compliance & Quality-VV the CNA skills competency checklist for CNA-TT was signed as complete by CNA-TT & Prior DON-JJ on 1/4/24 and asked if there is a current competency.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide left arm support at the toilet to assist in transfers for one resident (Resident) 1) in a total sample of 3. This failure placed the resident at higher risk for falls and injury.Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis-MS (a neurological disease) and vision loss.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/10/25 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact and had no falls since admission.Review of a General Note dated 08/29/25 at 12:20 PM located in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR revealed, Resident found in private bathroom sitting on buttock in between toilet and sink. Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not maintain an effective infection control program under which it investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the facility. * Total infection rates were not calculated accurately and rates of infection for individual infection types were not calculated. Since infection rates were not calculated it was not possible to analyze the data to determine if there was a rise in the prevalence of infections from month to month with a potential to affect 32 of 32 residents. * R33 was observed to receive treatment to her pressure injuries and proper hand hygiene was not used in accordance to the facilities policies and procedures. Findings include: 1.) On 3/27/25 at 9:30 a.m., Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E who is in charge of the infection control program. LPN-E indicated that she does not calculate individual rates of infection and will count an infection in more than 1 month if it continues or is chronic. LPN-E indicated she just started separating the facility associated infection from the community…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespreadRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure proper inspection of resident beds. *On 02/12/2025 and 03/03/2025, R26 was injured during a transfer. The metal pieces of R26's bed did not have plastic caps to protect R26's shins and legs from the bed's sharp metal edges. Findings include: 1.) Surveyor reviewed the Facility provided document titled, Injury of Known Cause dated 02/12/2025, that documents, that unnamed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported an R26's room, upon entering R26's room there was a sheet on the ground saturated with blood. R26 had a deep skin tear to the front of R26's left leg with visible tissue. R26 states they hit their leg on the side of their bed while trying to transfer. R26 states hit on bed frame and was in pain. Immediate action taken documents, R26's leg was wrapped to stop the bleeding, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was called and R26 was sent out for further evaluation and treatment. Predisposing environmental factors documents, Furniture. Predisposing physiological factors documents, Weakness. Predisposing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R26) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management received pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and Resident choice related to pain management. * The facility did not provide as needed pain medication or offer non-pharmacological interventions on 03/07/2025 for R26. The facility did not confer with R26's healthcare team regarding documented ineffective pain medication and did not offer non-pharmacological pain interventions for R26 on 03/08/2025, 03/21/2025, and 03/25/2025. Findings: The facility's policy, titled Pain Management, with a last reviewed date of 08/09/2022, documents in part, . Pain Management and Treatment: . 2. Interventions for pain management will be incorporated into the components of the comprehensive care plan, addressing conditions or situations that may be associated with pain or may be included as a specific pain management need or goal. 6. Non-pharmacological interventions will include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by staff for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for neglect in a total sample of eight residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, provided to the survey team by the facility, revised 07/15/22, revealed, Neglect means failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Additionally, the policy revealed, Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to: Failure to provide care needs such as feeding, bathing, dressing, turning & positioning. During an interview on 09/21/23 at 11:58 AM, R10 stated, I'm so glad you are here. I heard the gentleman (R1) down the hall was left in his wheelchair for two shifts and he was soiled, and no one checked on him. I think that is elder abuse and I don't think we should be treated that way.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect by staff for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for neglect in a total sample of eight residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, provided to the survey team by the facility, revised 07/15/22, revealed, The facility will designate an [sic] leadership position in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with state law. During an interview on 09/21/23 at 12:38 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 stated R1 was neglected by being left unattended and soiled for the duration of two shifts beginning on 08/28/23. CNA3 reported this incident to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). During an interview on 09/21/23 at 12:58 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 confirmed CNA3's statement and witnessed R1's condition of neglect. LPN3 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of neglect by staff for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for neglect in a total sample of eight residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, provided to the survey team by the facility, revised 07/15/22, revealed, An immediate investigation is warranted when allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. During an interview on 09/21/23 at 11:58 AM, R10 reported an incident of what she considered elder abuse. R10 stated that she heard R1 was left soiled and in his wheelchair for two shifts. Review of R10's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 02/03/20 with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Review of R10's re-admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/24/23, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-03 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility did not ensure contact information for all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, was posted. Further, a statement that the Resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to Resident abuse or neglect, and non-compliance with the advanced directives requirements, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and requests for information regarding returning to the community was not posted. This practice had the potential to affect all 33 residents of the facility at the time of the survey. * The facility did not have posted list of names, addresses (mailing and emailing), and telephone numbers for all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups such as adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long term care facilities, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and a statement that the Resident may file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSHR OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2019 |
| ARROWHEAD 123 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 10/01/2019 |
| THE LANE MORRELL BOWEN TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 10/01/2019 |
| MILLS, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 18% | since 10/01/2019 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| BAUMANN, TROY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| HOEHN, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/09/2025 |
| CONTINUUM THERAPY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/09/2025 |
| NSH REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WIPFLI LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| BELONGIA, CHRISTINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2019 |
| GEE, DARREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/30/2021 |
| GREER, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/29/2023 |
| PATZER, COLLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/14/2023 |
| PURTELL, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2019 |
| SCHELLHORN, KATHERINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2024 |
| SIDHU, SARFRAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| NSH 146 CLOVER STREET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $217K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525346. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.