No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stevens Point Health Services

1800 Sherman Ave, Stevens Point, WI 54481 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (715) 344-1800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (715) 344-1800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
900 Illinois Ave · (715) 346-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.9 mi
3301 Church St · (715) 345-2843 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3264 Church St · (715) 544-6066 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1510 Sherman Ave · (715) 344-4337

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%16.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.6%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.3%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.9%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.1%16.9%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.7%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%24.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.7%15.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.1%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.1%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit28.7%15.5%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.5%CMS range 31.9–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.9–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened16.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.0%CMS range 5.8–16.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.09
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
57.1%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 43.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.23 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R1 and R3) of 3 sampled residents received the necessary care and services to prevent and heal pressure injuries. R1 was admitted to the facility following a fall with fractures and had bilateral splints to the lower extremities. The splints were not removed for skin checks and R1 developed an unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI) on the right heel. In addition, R1 had a pressure injury on the sacrum that was allegedly present upon admission on [DATE]. Treatment was not initiated until 10/4/24 and air mattress was not ordered until 10/11/24. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a pressure injury on the left heel. A wound assessment and treatment order were not obtained until 5/15/24. The facility did not complete weekly wound assessments or notify the wound clinic when the wound had purulent (containing pus) exudate and appeared infected. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of transfers or discharges for 4 residents (R) (R41, R43, R5, and R6) of 4 sampled residents.R41 was transferred to the hospital on 7/1/25. The Ombudsman was not notified of the transfer.R43 was discharged home on 5/2/25. The Ombudsman was not notified of the discharge.R5 was transferred to the hospital on 5/9/25. The Ombudsman was not notified of the transfer.R6 was transferred to the hospital on 1/29/25, 3/17/25, and 6/15/25. The Ombudsman was not notified of the transfers.Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge policy, dated 7/15/22, indicates: The facility permits each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident except as initiated by the resident, necessary for the health and safety of the resident .6. Non-Emergency Transfers or Discharges .B. At least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged , the Social Services Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R3 and R34) of 5 sampled residents had documentation that indicated the residents or their legal representatives were informed in advance of the risks and benefits of prescribed medications. R3 was prescribed divalproex sodium (Depakote) (an anticonvulsant medication) and clindamycin phosphate external solution 1% topical (an antibiotic medication). Verbal consent for the medications was received from R3's activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC), however, written consent was not obtained.R34 was prescribed Ambien (a sedative medication), quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication), hydroxyzine (an antihistamine medication used to treat anxiety), Lyrica (an anticonvulsant medication used to treat neuropathic pain), Lexapro (an antidepressant medication), and oxcarbazepine (an anticonvulsant medication used to treat bipolar disorder). The facility did not obtain consents for the psychotropic medications.Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not monitor for adverse consequences or the effectiveness of psychotropic medication for 1 resident (R) (R44) of 6 sampled residents. The facility did not monitor for adverse consequences or the effectiveness of trazadone (an antidepressant medication) and sertraline (an antidepressant medication) for R44. Findings include:The facility's Medication Monitoring: Medication Management policy, dated 1/2025, indicates: Each resident's drug regimen is reviewed to ensure it is free from unnecessary drugs .The facility's medication management supports and promotes .The monitoring of medications for efficacy and adverse consequences .Additional specific guidelines are applied to psychotropic drugs which are defined as any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. This includes, but are not limited to antipsychotics; antidepressants .The intent of this requirement is that: Each resident's entire drug/medication regimen is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 (Registered Nurse (RN)-I) of 8 facility and contracted staff reviewed for caregiver background checks.The facility did not ensure a thorough and timely caregiver background check was completed for agency RN-I.Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 7/15/22, indicates: Potential employees will be screened for history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, and consultants. Background checks, including re-checks, will be completed consistent with applicable state laws and regulation .On 7/22/25 at 1:59 PM, Surveyor reviewed background check information for 8 facility and agency staff, including RN-I. Surveyor noted RN-I's Background Information Disclosure (BID) form was not dated. RN-I's start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive plan of care was revised in a timely manner for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 1 sampled resident.R6's care plan was not revised after R6 was readmitted from the hospital on 3/20/25 and 6/23/25 with diagnoses of sepsis/urosepsis (urinary tract infection (UTI) that spreads to the blood stream).Findings include: On 7/23/25, Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record. R6 had diagnoses including urosepsis, bullous pemphigoid (an autoimmune skin disease that causes blisters), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant neoplasm of peritoneum, liver, ovary, gallbladder and bile ducts, UTIs, schizophrenia, and anxiety. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/25/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated R6 had intact cognition. R6 made R6's own healthcare decisions.On 3/17/25, R6 was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with sepsis/Escherichia (E). coli bacteremia (presence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 3 sampled residents. R5's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oxygen equipment were not cleaned and replaced in accordance with orders on R5's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Findings include:The facility follows guidelines from Company (CP)-L which were provided to Surveyor on 7/23/25 at 11:06 AM by Nursing Home Administration (NHA)-A when Surveyor requested the facility's oxygen policy. The undated CP-L guidelines indicate for infection control and to reduce the risk of infections, it is important to keep your equipment clean. Care of your cannula/mask, tubing, and humidifier bottle: 1. (CP-L) recommends you replace your cannula or mask each week and oxygen extension tubing and humidifier bottle once every month. 3. The humidifier bottle must be cleaned between fills or once per week .CP-L guidelines labeled Cleaning your CPAP/Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) equipment indicate: Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate order transcription and medication administration for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 2 sampled residents.On 7/22/25, R5 was administered 81 milligram (mg) of enteric coated (EC) aspirin which differed from R5's order. In addition, the wrong dose of fluticasone propionate was administered. Findings include:On 7/22/25, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R5 had intact cognition. On 7/22/25 at 8:04 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-K administer R5's AM medication. RN-K administered 81 mg of EC aspirin and 2 sprays of fluticasone propionate nasal spray in each nostril. Surveyor reviewed R5's physician orders which indicated:~ Aspirin 81 mg capsule, give one capsule daily~ Fluticasone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 4 residents observed during the provision of cares. R5 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). On 7/21/25, staff did not follow EBP during high-contact cares for R5. Finding include:The facility's Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions (TBP) policy, revised 9/24/24, indicates: .10. Contact precautions: A. Intended to prevent transmission of pathogens that are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment .C. Healthcare personnel caring for residents on contact precautions wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or potentially contaminated areas in the resident's environment. D. Donning personal protective equipment (PPE) upon room entry and discarding before exiting the room is done to contain pathogens, especially those that have been implicated in transmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication cart was locked when unattended. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 38 residents residing in the facility. On 6/13/25, Surveyor observed an unattended and unlocked medication cart on the second floor by the nurses' station. Two residents were in the vicinity. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medication Storage/Storage of Medication policy, dated 1/2025, indicates: Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration .Procedure: .3. In order to limit access to prescription medications, only licensed nurses, pharmacy staff, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as Medication Aides) are allowed to access medication carts. Medication rooms, cabinets, and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended to by persons with authorized access. On 6/13/25 at 9:50 AM, Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food preferences were accommodated and/or individualized meal tickets were followed for 10 residents (R) (R1, R4, R6, R7, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13 and R14) of 16 sampled residents. Staff did not follow R1's individualized meal ticket on 6/13/25. Staff did not provide item listed on R4's individualized meal ticket on 6/13/25. Staff did not ensure R6, R7, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13 and R14 received drinks as indicated on their individualized meal tickets for lunch on 6/13/25. Findings include: The facility's Meal Distribution policy, revised 9/2017, indicates: .1. All meals will be assembled in accordance with the individualized diet order, plan of care, and preferences .4. The nursing staff will be responsible for verifying meal accuracy and the timely delivery of meals to residents. 5. For point-of-service dining, the Dining Services department staff, under the supervision of the licensed nurse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure proper footwear was worn during a mechanical lift transfer for 1 resident (R) (R17) of 1 sampled resident. R17 had diabetes and was at risk for foot injury. Staff did not ensure R17 wore proper footwear when they transferred R17 with a sit-to-stand lift. Findings include: The facility's Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, revised 11/28/22. indicates: In order to protect the safety and well being of staff and residents and to promote quality of care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents. Procedure: 1. Resident safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. WisTech Open under Nursing Assistant Section 8.4-Assisting Clients to Transfer indicates staff should check that the resident is wearing non-skid footwear before transferring.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide adaptive eating equipment for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 16 sampled residents. Staff did not provide R5 with lidded cups and a divided plate per R5's meal ticket. Findings include: The facility's Assistive Devices policy, revised 9/2017, indicates: .Assistive devices/utensils will be provided as identified in the individualized plan of care to maintain or improve a resident's ability to eat or drink independently On 6/13/25, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, cerebral ischemia (reduced blood flow to the brain) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R5''s Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/9/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 which indicated R5 had severe cognitive impairment. R5 had a legal Guardian. On 6/13/25, Surveyor reviewed R5's meal ticket which indicated R5 should receive cups with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R17) of 2 residents observed during the provision of care. Staff did not ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for R17 during high-contact cares. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised 8/8/24, indicates: The facility will implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) .EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDROs that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities .4. High-contact resident care activities include: a. dressing .c. transferring . On 6/13/25, Surveyor reviewed R17's medical record. R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse/neglect was reported to the State Agency (SA) in a timely manner for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 11 sampled residents. R2 and R2's family member reported an allegation of abuse/neglect to staff. The facility did not report the allegation to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 7/15/22, indicates: IV. Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to: 1. Resident, staff or family report of abuse .VII. Reporting Response: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified time frames. On 4/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including obesity, muscle weakness, anxiety, and depression. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/7/25, had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all allegation of abuse/neglect was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 11 sampled residents. The facility did not thoroughly investigate on allegation of abuse/neglect reported by R2 and R2's family member. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 7/15/22, indicates: .IV. Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to: 1. Resident, staff, or family report of abuse .V. Investigation of Alleged abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: A. An immediate investigation is warranted when an allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. 1. Written procedures for investigations include: Identifying staff responsible for the investigation .4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation .6.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 2 sampled residents. R1 was admitted to the facility with a pressure injury (PI) on the left heel. The facility did not complete accurate assessments of R1's left heel PI. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injuries and Non Pressure Injuries policy, revised 7/20/22, indicates: The center will complete a comprehensive assessment to identify risk factors for the development of pressure injuries and put in place measures intended to achieve the goal of prevention of pressure injuries in our residents. For those residents admitted with, or who subsequently develop a pressure injury or impaired skin integrity, they will receive care, treatment, and services that seek to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent further development of pressure injuries/impaired skin integrity .The staging of a pressure injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 3 residents (R) (R9, R6, and R5) of 7 residents observed during medication administration and the provision of care. During observations of medication administration for R9, R6, and R5, Medication Technician (MT)-C and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D did not complete appropriate hand hygiene. MT-C and LPN-D did not adhere to contact precautions during medication administration for R6 and R5. Findings include: The facility's Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions policy, dated 9/24/24, indicates: .Contact precautions refer to measures that are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment .c. Healthcare personnel caring for residents on contact precautions wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident representative was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. R1 experienced an overall decline including changes in transfer ability and eating habits during November and December of 2024. The changes were not communicated to R1's court-appointed Guardian. Findings include: The facility's Change in Condition of the Resident policy, revised 9/20/22, indicates: A facility should immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is .a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status (that is deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications); or a need to alter treatment .4. Notify the resident's family/responsible party as applicable and in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not consistently monitor nutrition intake for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. R1 experienced a significant weight loss. Staff did not consistently monitor or document R1's meal intake to determine if nutritional interventions were effective. Findings include: The facility's Weight Monitoring policy, revised 12/21/22, indicates: The interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight change for our residents .8. The threshold for significant weight change will be based on the following criteria .a. 1 month - 5% weight change is significant; greater than 5% is severe . On 2/11/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms associated with a decline in memory severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure proper infection control practices were maintained related to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R3) of 2 residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). R2 was on EBP due to urinary concerns. Staff did not don the appropriate PPE during the provision of high-contact care for R2 on 11/5/24. R3 was on EBP due to wounds and colonized bacteria in R3's urine. Staff did not don the appropriate PPE during the provision of high-contact care for R3 on 11/5/24. Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 7/23/2024, indicates: .4. Standard Precautions: a) All staff shall assume that all residents are potentially infected or colonized with an organism that could be transmitted during the course of providing resident care. b) Hand hygiene shall be performed in accordance with our facility's established hand hygiene procedures. c) All staff shall use personal protective equipment (PPE) according to established…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure bathing assistance was provided for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. R1 did not receive 3 of 10 scheduled showers between the dates of 4/23/24 and 7/10/24. Findings include: On 8/13/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and diabetes mellitus (a disease in which blood sugar levels are too high). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/24, stated R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15 which indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1's MDS assessment indicated R1 required the assistance of staff for bathing. R1 was hospitalized on [DATE], returned to the facility on 6/27/24, was hospitalized on [DATE], returned to the facility on 7/7/24, and passed away at the facility on 7/10/24. R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. R1 did not consistently receive pain medication timely or accurately as ordered by R1's physician. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 1/2024, indicates: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber .Medications are administered within 60 minutes of their scheduled time . On 8/13/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), lung cancer, and bone cancer. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/24, stated R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the food and nutrition services director who was a certified dietary manager, had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national accrediting body, or had an associates or higher level degree in food service management or hospitality. This practice had the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-H did not complete an approved dietary manager or food service manager certification course or other related education. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 9:53 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM-H who indicated DM-H just started as a cook at the facility. DM-H indicated DM-H worked in maintenance and also worked as a cook in an assisted living facility. DM-H stated DM-H was enrolled in ServSafe (which is not an approved Dietary Manager certification course,) but had not yet completed the course. DM-H also indicated DM-H would enroll in a dietary manager course after DM-H finished the ServSafe course. DM-H stated the facility had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not complete hand hygiene after washing dishes and prior to touching ready to eat food. The counter was not in clean condition when staff cut vegetables. The microwave was not in clean condition and the mixer was not covered. Staff did not maintain unit refrigerator and freezer temperature logs. Open items in the walk-in cooler and dry storage area did not contain open dates. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 9:48 AM, Surveyor began an initial kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM)-H who stated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. Hand Hygiene: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at Chapter 2 Personal Cleanliness 2-301.14 When to Wash: Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as specified under 2-301.12 .(E) After handling soiled equipment or utensils; .(I) After engaging in other activities that contaminate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) completed infection prevention and control training and was employed at least part-time in the facility. This practice had the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. The facility's designated IP did not work in the facility at least part-time. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) memo QSO-22-19-NH, last revised 6/29/22, indicates: In 2016, CMS overhauled the Requirements for Participation for Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities (i.e., nursing homes) which was implemented in three phases: .Phase 3 (11/28/19) regulations require nursing homes to have an Infection Preventionist who has specialized training onsite at least part-time to effectively oversee the facility's infection prevention and control program. During the entrance conference on 5/6/24 at 9:29 AM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A informed Surveyor that Director of Nursing Mentor (DONM)-E oversaw the IP role and mentored Assistant Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not ensure the right to personal privacy for 1 resident (R) (R21) of 19 sampled residents. During an observation on 5/6/24, staff did not ensure R21 had visual privacy and dignity during personal care. Findings include: On 5/6/24, Surveyor reviewed R21's medical record. R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history including Parkinson's disease and dementia. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/8/24, indicated R21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15 which indicated R21 had moderately impaired cognition. R21's care plan, dated 4/29/24, with a target date of 5/30/24, indicated the following: ~ R21 had physical limitations, cognitive loss, and difficulty communicating. ~ R21 was dependent on staff for bathing, showing, dressing, and bed mobility. ~ R21's needs would be met with comfort and dignity. On 5/6/24 at 2:41 PM, Surveyor was standing in the lobby near the nurses' station and noted a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate fall prevention interventions were in place for 3 residents (R) (R36, R10, and R291) of 3 sampled residents. R36 fell on 3/14/24 and 3/18/24. The facility did not implement new fall interventions to prevent future falls. R36 fell again on 3/22/24. R10 was admitted to the facility following a fall with a fracture at home. R10 had a rug in R10's room with curled edges. The facility did not develop a comprehensive falls care plan, including R10's preference and risk for keeping the rug in R10's room. R291's smoking materials were to be stored securely by staff. During an observation on 5/7/24, smoking materials were observed in R291's room. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines policy, with review date of 11/8/22, indicates: Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized plan of care to minimize the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 2 residents (R) (R8 and R144) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. R8 used humidified oxygen from a concentrator. R8 did not have a physician's order for oxygen use. In addition, R8's care plan did not address oxygen use and R8's oxygen tubing was not labeled to indicate the date the tubing was last changed. R144 used oxygen from a concentrator. R144 did not have a physician's order for oxygen use or a care plan that addressed the use of oxygen. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Cylinder Compressed Gas policy, with a reviewed/revised date of 6/27/22, indicates oxygen is a drug which must be ordered by a physician .Oxygen devices: Nasal cannula - change out weekly and as needed (PRN) 1. Between 5/6/24 and 5/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic acute and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmacy services in accordance with the wishes of a resident/legal representative when the facility administered vaccines to 1 resident (R) (R11) of 5 sampled residents who declined the vaccines. The facility administered COVID 19 and influenza vaccines to R11 after R11 declined the vaccines. Findings include: 1. From 5/6/24 through 5/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R11's medical record. R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) pneumonia. R11 had a legal guardian for decision making. A progress note, dated 1/3/24 at 11:32 AM, indicated R11 declined the influenza and COVID-19 vaccines per a consent/declination sheet signed by R11's legal guardian on 1/3/24. A progress note, dated 1/3/24 at 13:37, indicated R11 received an influenza vaccine and a COVID-19 booster. R11's vaccination record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 5/8/24 at 11:02 AM, Surveyor observed CNA-P and CNA-Q provide care for R27. After performing hand hygiene and donning gloves, CNA-P and CNA-Q assisted R27 onto the commode via EZ stand. CNA-P removed R27's incontinence brief which was soiled with a small amount of stool. CNA-P performed hand hygiene, donned clean gloves, and washed R27's perineal area. Following perineal care, CNA-P did not remove gloves, cleanse hands, and don clean gloves before CNA-P touched R27's clean brief, clothing, wheelchair, and the EZ stand lift. On 5/8/24 at 11:10 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA-P who verified CNA-P did not remove soiled gloves and perform hand hygiene after completing pericare and before touching the items mentioned above. On 5/8/24 at 12:57 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON-B who stated DON-B expects staff to complete hand hygiene prior to donning gloves for pericare and after cleansing the resident. DOB-B indicated moving from a dirty to clean task requires hand hygiene. Based on observation, staff interview, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vaccinations were reviewed, offered, or administered for 3 residents (R) (R7, R11, and R21) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility did not offer R7 the PCV20 (Prevnar 20®) vaccine. The facility did not offer R11 the PCV20® vaccine. The facility did not offer R21 the PCV20® vaccine. Findings include: Abbreviations (www.cdc.gov): PCV13: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar13®) PCV15: 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Vaxneuvance®) PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20®) PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax23®) The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations indicate: For adults 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23, the CDC recommends: Give 1 dose of PCV15 or PCV20. The PCV15 or PCV20 dose should be administered at least 1 year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. Regardless of if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure effective pain management was provided for 1 resident (R) (R91) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management. R91 was not provided effective pain management in a timely manner on 3/18/24. Findings include: The facility's Pain Management policy, with a review date of 8/9/22 indicates: The facility must ensure pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences .1. To help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility will: a. Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated .c. Manage or prevent pain, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 5 of 8 facility and contracted staff reviewed for caregiver background checks. The facility did not ensure thorough and timely caregiver background checks were completed for Maintenance Director (MD)-C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D, CNA-E, CNA-F, and Occupational Therapist (OT)-G. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, with review date of 7/15/22, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property .Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a potential allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents. R1 expressed fear of the care provided by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E following an incident on 1/31/24. The potential allegation of abuse was not reported timely to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and was not reported to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, with a review date of 7/15/22, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property .Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to: .10. Sudden or unexplained changes in behaviors and/or activities such as fear of a person .Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a potential allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents. R1 expressed fear of the care provided by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E following an incident on 1/31/24. The potential allegation of abuse was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, with a review date of 7/15/22, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property .Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to: .10. Sudden or unexplained changes in behaviors and/or activities such as fear of a person .An immediate investigation is warranted when an allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a provider or Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) were notified following falls for 2 Residents (R) (R3 and R14) of 2 sampled residents. The facility did not notify R3's provider following two of three falls on 9/1/23. The facility did not notify R3's POAHC following any of the falls. The facility did not notify R14's provider or POAHC following falls on 9/5/23, 9/17/23, and 11/27/23. Finding include: The facility's Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines policy, last reviewed on 11/8/22, included the following: When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: .C. Notify physician and family/responsible party . 1. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, depression, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. R3 was nonverbal, had an activated POAHC, and discharged from the facility on 9/5/23. On 1/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record which included a nursing note, dated 9/1/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interview, the facility did not make a prompt effort to thoroughly investigate and resolve a grievance for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 14 sampled residents. On 8/6/23, R2's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) sent an email to the facility that expressed multiple concerns regarding R2's care. The facility did not thoroughly investigate or provide resolution of the grievance. Findings include: The facility's Grievance Policy, with a review date of 7/2022, indicated: The facility will seek to resolve concerns, complaints or grievances and provide residents, responsible parties, staff and others feedback and resolution in a timely manner .The resident has a right to voice grievances without fear of retaliation .The Grievance Officer for the facility is the Administrator .During the investigation, the Grievance Officer will prevent any potential or further violation of resident rights .Once resolution of the grievance is achieved, the Grievance Officer will ensure follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure fall assessments were completed and care plan interventions to prevent falls were added/updated for 2 Residents (R) (R3 and R14) of 2 sampled residents. The facility did not appropriately assess R3 following three falls on 9/1/23. In addition, the facility did not investigate the circumstances surrounding the falls or update R3's care plan with interventions to prevent future falls. The facility did not appropriately assess R14 following falls on 9/5/23, 9/17/23, and 11/27/23. In addition, the facility did not investigate the circumstances surrounding the falls or update R14's care plan with interventions to prevent future falls. Finding include: The facility's Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines policy, last reviewed on 11/8/22, included the following: When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: a. Complete a post-fall assessment and review. 1. Physical assessment with vital signs. 2. Neurochecks for any unwitnessed fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide opportunities for residents and/or their legal representatives to participate in their care planning process when changes were made during the assessment and care planning process. This has the potential to affect 5 of 9 sampled residents. (R14, R2, R20, R19 and R22). Sampled residents R14, R2, R20, R19 and R22 were not provided the opportunity to participate in their care planning process when Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments prompted changes to the plan of care. Findings include: Example 1 R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another skilled nursing facility. Diagnoses include, in part, dementia with behavioral disturbances, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, malnutrition, and heart disease. R14 has court appointed guardian and is protectively placed. R14's most recent quarterly MDS completed on 01/15/23 notes R14 has severe cognitive impairment, rarely understands and is rarely understood. On 04/16/23 at 1:20 p.m., Surveyor spoke with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-18 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure timely physician visits were being conducted for four residents (R9, R10, R2 and R16). - R9 was hospitalized [DATE]- 5/28/22. From 5/28/22 through next hospital stay of 1/13/23 - 1/1/7/23 there have been no face-to face visits from a physician with the exception of Dermatology. R9 was again sent to the Emergency Department 3/1/23 and returned that evening. - R10 was admitted [DATE] and to date, has not yet been seen by a medical physician. - R2 was not seen by a physician from 8/8/22 until present. - R16 was admitted [DATE]. There is no record that R16 has yet been seen by a physician. This is evidenced by: During the Covid-19 Pandemic, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) issued a temporary emergency declaration blanket waiver for Physician visits, indicating that Physician visits may be conducted offsite through Telehealth services. On 4/7/22, CMS published Memo QSO-22-15-NH (Nursing Home) & NLTC (National Long-Term Care) & LSC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not obtain written consent explaining the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (R19). R19 is prescribed risperdal, an antipsychotic medication for agitation related to dementia with lewy bodies, and buspirone, an antianxiety medication for general anxiety. The facility did not have a written, signed consent explaining the risks and benefits of to R19's power of attorney (POA). This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed R19's current physician orders and noted R19 is currently ordered the following: ~3/29/23: Buspirone 15 mg tid for general anxiety ~2/03/23: Risperdal 0.25 mg every day for agitation related to dementia with lewy bodies Surveyor noted although there were dose changes, the Buspirone was initiated on 2/16/23 and the Risperdal was initiated on 8/13/21. Surveyor noted R19 has an activated power of attorney for his health care decisions. Surveyor reviewed R19's record and could not locate a written consent explaining the reason for the medications, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not complete and implement baseline or comprehensive care plans (CP) for 1 of 3 Residents (R 79), within 48 hours of admission, that included instructions on how to provide effective and person-centered care for the resident. Surveyor reviewed R79's medical record and was unable to locate a baseline or comprehensive CP that would have been dated within the first 48 hours of admission. The CP was first developed 4/11/23 or four days following admission. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Baseline Care Plan was dated 9/22/22 and included the following directives to staff: .1. The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to: i. Initial goals based on admission orders ii. Physician orders iii. Dietary orders iv. Therapy services v. Social services . 2. The admitting nurse/designee shall gather information from the admission physical assessment, hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure staff consistently provided necessary services to maintain good grooming and toileting needs for 2 of 4 residents (R25 and R79) sampled. - R79 indicated a long call light response, and as a result of the lengthy time in which to receive care, had a large incontinent bowel movement in her pants. - Random observations were conducted in which R25 had long whiskers on her chin, which were bothersome to her and she requested multiple times to have them tended to. This is evidenced by: Example 1 R79 was admitted to the facility 4/7/23, following hospitalization after a fall at home in which she sustained a Displaced Fracture of the Second Vertebra, multiple fractures of right sided ribs, a Left-Sided Cervical 2 fracture and a Traumatic Hemopneumothorax. Other medical diagnoses for R79 include, but are not limited to Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Syncope and Collapse, Hypothyroidism, Chronic Combined Systolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 2 of 15 (R9 and R19) residents reviewed, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. - R9's physician orders were not followed related to labwork requested. - R19 has not gotten out of bed for several weeks due to his poor positioning in his wheelchair. Example 1 R9 had medical diagnoses that included, but were not limited to Acute Pancreatitis without Necrosis or infection, Muscle Weakness, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment, which was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE], R9 required extensive assistance of two staff to meet her basic needs of personal hygiene and dressing and limited assistance of two staff for bathing. The Comprehensive Care Plan devised for R9 also addressed the need for staff assistance in the problem titled The resident has a self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, 1 of 1 residents reviewed for limited range of motion did not receive the necessary care and service to prevent further decline in range of motion. R19 was admitted [DATE]. R19 has limitation of his lower extremity range of motion and has not received range of motion services since the program was initiated by therapy department. This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed R19's medical record and noted he was admitted [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of non Alzheimer's dementia R19's most recent minimum data set (MDS) which was a quarterly dated: 1/16/23 notes R19 rarely understands, is rarely understood and has severe cognitive impairment. R19 requires extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, toilet use and hygiene. R19 is dependent on 2 staff for transfer. R19 has limited range of motion of both lower extremities. Surveyor reviewed R19's most recent comprehensive annual MDS dated [DATE]. The MDS notes R19 rarely understands and is rarely understood with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene for 3 of 6 residents (R) observed in the dining room. R11, R4 and R5. On 4/16/23 at 1200 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P did not perform appropriate hand hygiene when moving from resident to resident (R4, R5, R11) in the dining room. This is evidenced by: On 4/18/23, Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled; Hand Hygiene. Under number 6 it states: Additional considerations; a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and immediately after removing gloves. On the facility Hand Hygiene Table it notes that hands should be washed with soap and water or with hand sanitizer between resident contacts. On 4/16/23 at approximately 12:00 PM, Surveyor observed lunch being served in the 2nd floor dining area. There were 6 residents in the dining area at that time being served lunch on individual trays. Surveyor observed CNA P serve R5 their meal. R5 appeared to be blind and CNA P was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-08 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the minimum required members of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee met at least quarterly. This practice had the potential to impact all 42 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not hold two of four required QAPI meetings in the past year or six of twelve monthly meetings per their policy. For the two required QAPI meetings held, the facility was unable to provide verification of attendance for the required members. Findings include: The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee policy, dated 7/11/22, indicates: The Executive Director and the Director of Nursing (DON) are responsible and accountable for the development, implementation, monitoring, and leadership of the center's QAPI program. A core team of individuals will be appointed to spearhead the QAPI program and will engage in monthly QAPI meetings which will include the creation/modification of performance improvement plans (PIPs). The center's QAPI committee may include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Elroy Health ServicesElroy, WI 1 of 5Florence Health ServicesFlorence, WI 1 of 5Hopkins Restorative Care CenterHopkins, MN 1 of 5La Crescent Health ServicesLa Crescent, MN 1 of 5Little Chute Health ServicesLittle Chute, WI 1 of 5Minot Health And Rehab, LLCMinot, ND 1 of 5Plymouth Health ServicesPlymouth, WI 1 of 5Rochester Restorative Care CenterRochester, MN 1 of 5Sheboygan Progressive Health ServicesSheboygan, WI 1 of 5Williams Bay Health ServicesWilliams Bay, WI 1 of 5Wisconsin Rapids Health ServicesWisconsin Rapids, WI 2 of 5Birch Hill Health ServicesShawano, WI 2 of 5Colonial Health ServicesColby, WI 2 of 5Evergreen Health ServicesShawano, WI 2 of 5Green Bay Health ServicesGreen Bay, WI 2 of 5Heritage Health ServicesPort Washington, WI 2 of 5Lake Country Health ServicesOconomowoc, WI 2 of 5Lancaster Health ServicesLancaster, WI 2 of 5Maple Ridge Health ServicesMilwaukee, WI 2 of 5Menomonee Falls Health ServicesMenomonee Falls, WI 2 of 5Mineral Point Health ServicesMineral Point, WI 2 of 5Soldiers Grove Health ServicesSoldiers Grove, WI 2 of 5Sunrise Health ServicesMilwaukee, WI 2 of 5Three Oaks Health ServicesMarshfield, WI 2 of 5Tomahawk Health ServicesTomahawk, WI 2 of 5Whitewater Health ServicesSt Charles, MN 2 of 5Willowcrest Health ServicesSouth Milwaukee, WI 3 of 5Cedarburg Health ServicesCedarburg, WI 3 of 5Court Manor Health ServicesAshland, WI 3 of 5Hayward Health ServicesHayward, WI 3 of 5Homestead Health ServicesNew Holstein, WI 3 of 5Mercy Health ServicesMilwaukee, WI 3 of 5Morningside Health ServicesSheboygan, WI 3 of 5Oakwood Health ServicesAltoona, WI 3 of 5Randolph Health ServicesRandolph, WI 3 of 5Rib Lake Health ServicesRib Lake, WI 3 of 5River's Bend Health ServicesManitowoc, WI 3 of 5Riverview Health ServicesTomahawk, WI 3 of 5Sheboygan Health ServicesSheboygan, WI 3 of 5St Francis Health ServicesSaint Francis, WI

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NSHR OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2019
ARROWHEAD 123 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 10/01/2019
THE LANE MORRELL BOWEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 10/01/2019
MILLS, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 10/01/2019
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2002
BAUMANN, TROYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
HOEHN, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/09/2025
CONTINUUM THERAPY PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/09/2025
NSH REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
BELONGIA, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
GEE, DARRENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/30/2021
GREER, LAURENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/29/2023
PURTELL, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
RAMNANAN, KESHNIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
STECKLER, ALLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
NSH 1800 SHERMAN AVENUE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$275K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 24%Medicare 17%Other / private 60%

This home reported $275K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$450per resident / day
operating cost
$13,693per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$433per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525353. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next