Rochester Restorative Care Center
501 Eighth Avenue Southeast, Rochester, MN 55904 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (507) 288-6514 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $387,209 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-12)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (100%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.4% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.5% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.0% | 4.1% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.0% | 20.5% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.8% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.9% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.4% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.0% | 14.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.50 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.49 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.8%CMS range 40.4–64.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.5–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.3–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 62.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.54 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.67 to 1.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and monitor known aspiration precautions for residents with dysphagia, including ensuring correct diet texture, prescribed liquid consistency, supervision during meals, and safe meal positioning. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when the facility failed to ensure these requirements were consistently communicated to and followed by nursing and dietary staff for R1 which resulted in R1's hospitalization for diagnoses of pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit and following hospitalization, the facility failed to follow R1's prescribed diet putting R1 at risk for additional choking and or aspiration events. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the correct liquid consistency was provided according to the dietary order and failed to comprehensively assess and monitor R6 following a coughing episode for signs and symptoms of aspiration, placing R6 at risk for aspiration-related complications.The IJ…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess each fall, identify causal factors to determine reason for falls, identify potential effective interventions to decrease the risk for falls, and failed to comprehensively evaluate and implement fall interventions for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for resident safety. The facility's failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who sustained fractures after his first and second fall.The IJ began on 5/23/25, when the facility failed to complete a comprehensive fall assessment along with root cause analysis and implement appropriate interventions after R1 attempted to self-transfer, resulting in an unwitnessed fall requiring hospitalization with a right frontal sinus fracture. Upon return from the hospital, on 6/10/25, R1 again attempted to self-transfer resulting in an unwitnessed fall requiring hospitalization where R1 sustained two left pubic bone fractures with bleeding and hematoma…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor for a change in condition after a fall with a head strike for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who had a history of significant bleeding disorder. This resulted in delay of diagnoses and treatment for a subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed) and left hip contusion. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm for R1. Findings include: R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1 had been admitted to the hospital on [DATE], with chief complaint of generalized weakness and acute blood loss anemia. R1 had a history of acquired platelet dysfunction with multiple bleeding events leading to frequent hospitalization. R1 was discharged from the hospital to the facility in stable condition on 10/26/23. R1's Face Sheet identified R1 had diagnoses of myelodysplastic syndrome (a group of cancers in which immature blood cells in the bone marrow do not mature or become healthy blood cells,) thrombocytopenia (a condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerator were labeled, dated and free of expired foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors who received food from facility kitchen.Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/9/26 at 10:34 a.m., cook (C)-A greeted surveyor inside the kitchen. The following items were observed in the fridge expired and undated food:-Sliced Ham, expired on 3/2/26-no date on lettuce, browning and wilting Additionally, the following items were observed in the freezer:-box of food sitting directly on the freezer floor-box on top shelf of freezer touching freezer fan blade During the follow up kitchen tour on 3/12/26 at 12:25 p.m., district manager (DM) stated the expired sliced ham, and undated lettuce had been thrown out. DM confirmed the box on the floor of the freezer had been placed on a shelf. DM confirmed the box touching the freezer fan blade had been pushed back away from the fan blade. DM stated undated items should be thrown out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to provide a home like dining experience in 2 dining rooms when meals were left served to residents on a plastic food tray.Findings include:During an observation on 3/9/26 at 12:44p.m., of the 3rd floor dining room, lunch trays were brought up in a cart, the staff passed out the trays and left food items on plastic trays in front of residents.During an observation on 3/9/26 at 6:03p.m., of the 2nd floor dining room, dinner trays were brought up in a cart, the staff passed out the trays and left food items on plastic trays in front of the residents.During observation on 3/10/26 at 12:33 p.m., of the 3rd floor dining room, lunch trays were brought up in a cart, the staff passed out the trays to the residents and left food items on the plastic trays.During observation on 3/11/26 at 8:48 a.m., of the 3rd floor dining room, breakfast trays were brought up in a cart, staff passed out the trays and left food items on the plastic trays in front of the residents.During an interview on 3/10/26 at 1:15p.m. licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess transfers with a mechanical lift or develop and implement policies to ensure safety and supervision for 7 of 7 residents (R6, R36, R2, R8, R51, R60, R62) reviewed for accidents. Additionally, the facility failed to identify fall risk resulting in two falls for 1 of 1 resident (R77) reviewed for repeated falls.Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and required maximal assistance for mobility. R6's diagnoses included Parkinson's, dementia, major depressive disorder and lack of coordination. R6's care plan (CP) created on 9/14/24, identified mobility was an area of concern, indicated was not ambulatory and needed transfer assistance of 2 and mechanical lift (EZ stand). Furthermore, the CP identified an area of concern, indicated was at risk for falls due to dementia, impaired coordination and mobility, medications, impulsiveness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of discontinued, expired, and discharged residents' medications. This had the potential to affect any resident who received medication from all facility medication rooms.Findings include:On [DATE] 10:00 a.m., 1st floor medication storage had 23-40 medication cards from discharged residents awaiting destruction and several bottles of over-the-counter expired bottles awaiting disposal. Registered nurse (RN)-B confirmed the medications on the counter were awaiting destruction and was unsure of the process of medication destruction. RN-B stated, the nurse manager took care of it, and we do not have one right now.The 1st floor med room storage had the following current resident medications awaiting destruction.R 81-Flomax capsule 0.4mg (Tamsulosin HCL) Take 0.4 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily-Inderal LA oral capsule Extended Release 24 hours (Propranolol HCL), Take 1 cap my mouth in the evening.- Lipitor oral tablet (Atorvastatin Calcium), take 10 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for self-administration of medication (SAM).Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/23/26 indicated R4 was cognitively intact, had no upper body impairment, was independent with personal hygiene, and required set-up to supervision for upper and lower body dressing.R4's diagnoses list included diabetes, end-stage kidney disease, heart failure, and morbid obesity. R4's self-administration care plan dated 11/20/25 lacked self-administration of nystatin powder (medication used to treat fungal infections). R4's provider orders included: Nystatin powder 1 application to affected areas under right breast and skin folds topically twice a day and as needed.R4's medical record lacked a self-administration assessment for applying Nystatin powder. During observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 3:45 p.m., R4 stated she keeps her nystatin powder locked up in the canvas bag located on her bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the provider timely of ordered medication refusals for 2 of 2 residents (R4, R44) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R4: R4's face sheet indicates R4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a 12-day hospital stay for a below the knee amputation. R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/23/26, indicated R4 was cognitively intact, had no upper body impairment, was independent with personal hygiene, and required set-up to supervision for upper and lower body dressing. R4's diagnoses list included diabetes, end-stage kidney disease, heart failure, and morbid obesity. R4's care plan indicated R4 is resistive/noncompliant with treatments/cares related to manipulative behaviors, loss of independence and control with a goal of understanding the consequences of refusal/noncompliance. R4's provider orders dated 11/18/25 indicated: Nystatin powder (medication used to treat fungal infections) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 1 resident (R77) reviewed for care plans.Findings include:R77's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not available at time of survey. A facility document title Nursing-Admissions/readmission Observation dated 3/5/26, noted R77 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R77's cognition was intact. R77 requires transfer assistance, assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and assistance managing new colostomy, (a surgical opening in the colon that allows stool to exit the body through a stoma into an external pouch).R77's diagnoses included intestinal obstruction requiring a new colostomy, Parkinson's, urinary retention, and generalized muscle weakness.R77's electronic health record (EHR) indicated R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 2 p.m. EHR lacked evidence a baseline care plan had been initiated within 48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to revise and update a care plan for 1of 1 resident (R33) reviewed for care plan timing and revision.Findings include:R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/3/25, indicated intact cognition, R33 was independent with transfers, w/c mobility and required limited assist with bed mobility. R33 's diagnoses included chronic systolic and diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a serious condition of the heart's ability to pump blood efficiently), Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), generalized osteoarthritis.R33's care plan dated 11/19/25 indicated R33 was allowed to smoke independently in designated smoking areas, needed reminders and assistance to use smoking apron, and smoking materials needed to be secured at the nurses' station or other designated areas for storage.R33's Smoking Assessment completed on 2/20/26, indicated R33 was safe to smoke without supervision, demonstrated safe smoking practices, no indication of smoking apron use, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice when staff completed treatments without a provider order, failed to request orders for treatment, and failed to document treatment completion for 1 of 1 resident (R77) reviewed for ostomy cares.Findings Include:R77's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not available at time of survey. A facility document title Nursing-Admissions/readmission Observation dated 3/5/26, noted R77 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R77's cognition was intact. R77 requires transfer assistance, assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and assistance managing new colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening (stoma) in the abdomen, allowing stool to exit the body when the colon cannot function normally),.R77's diagnoses included intestinal obstruction requiring a new colostomy, Parkinson's, urinary retention, and generalized muscle weaknessR77's care plan dated 3/6/26, lacked direction or interventions of how to care for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place to provide treatment and monitoring for a colostomy (opening to allow waste to exit the body and be collected in a pouch) for 1 of 1 resident (R77) reviewed for ostomy care. Findings Include:R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]R77's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not available at time of survey. A facility document titled Nursing-Admissions/readmission Observation dated 3/5/26, noted R77 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R77's cognition was intact. R77 requires transfer assistance, assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and assistance managing new colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening (stoma) in the abdomen, allowing stool to exit the body when the colon cannot function normally). R77's diagnoses included intestinal obstruction requiring a new colostomy, Parkinson's, urinary retention, and generalized muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for respiratory care.Findings include: R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/20/26, indicated intact cognition, R44 required partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene.R44's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, chronic pulmonary edema, moderate persistent asthma, and dependence of renal dialysis.R44's was admitted on [DATE] with including, oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula continuously.During an observation on 3/09/26 at 7:24 p.m., R44 was on the oxygen concentrator with a flow rate of 3 liters.During observation on 3/10/26 11:11 a.m., R44 came down the unit hallway on her motorized scooter with no oxygen in use. R44 stated, the portable oxygen tank was empty and was in search of staff to have the tank filled. R44 searched for staff for 4 minutes. The director of nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/20/26, indicated intact cognition, R44 required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene. R44's diagnoses included acute kidney failure, dependence of renal dialysis hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, type2 diabetes mellitus, Pulmonary edema, moderate persistent asthma, dependence on supplemental oxygen, Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. R44's was admitted 0n 02/5/26 and orders dated 2/19/25 included: dialysis pre and post assessment every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Print and send assessment with resident to dialysis, place returned paperwork in manager box.Review of R44's MAR/TAR (medications administration/ treatments administration record) dated 2/5/26 to 2/28/26 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor effectiveness of a medication prescribed for sleep by not completing sleep monitoring for 1 of 1 resident (R33) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/3/25, indicated intact cognition, R33 was independent with transfers, w/c mobility and required limited assist with bed mobility. R33 diagnoses included chronic systolic and diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a serious condition of the heart's ability to pump blood efficiently), Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), generalized osteoarthritis.R33's medication orders included: Melatonin 5 milligrams (mg), oral at bedtime: start date:12/01/25 for insomnia.R33's Medication Administration Record (MAR) record review from 02/1/26 to 3/11/26 reviewed lacked sleep tracking or monitoring.R33' s progress note reviewed from 02/1/25 to 3/11/26 had no reference to R33 sleep monitoring.During an interview on 3/11/2026 at 4:05 p.m., registered nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) usage for 3 of 3 residents (R6, R4, R14) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) who receive tube feeding (R6, R14) and dialysis care (R4). Findings include: R6: R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and required maximal assistance for mobility. R6's diagnoses included Parkinson's, dementia, major depressive disorder and lack of coordination. R6's physician orders dated 4/24/25, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for tube feeding. R6 had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for enteral nutrition and medication. Cleanse surrounding skin with warm water using soft cloth, then pat dry. Apply barrier cream to skin under PEG tube disk to prevent moisture related skin redness. R6's care plan (CP) created on 1/27/25, identified R6 was at risk for infection related to indwelling medical device (PEG) tube. EBP when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a bathroom call light was functioning for the shower room on the 3rd floor having the potential to affect all residents that use the toilet in the shower room, 7 of 7 (R6, R36, R2, R8, R51, R60, R62) residents were brought to and used an EZ stand for toileting.Findings include:R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and required maximal assistance for mobility. R6's diagnoses included Parkinson's, dementia, major depressive disorder and lack of coordination.R6's care plan (CP) created on [DATE], identified mobility was an area of concern, indicated was not ambulatory and needed transfer assistance of 2 and mechanical lift (EZ stand). Furthermore, the CP identified an area of concern, indicated was at risk for falls due to dementia, impaired coordination and mobility, medications, impulsiveness and safety awareness.R36's MDS comprehensive assessment dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for respiratory and oxygen. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 9/10/25, identified diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and asthma (a condition in which a person's airway becomes inflamed, narrows, swells, and produces mucus). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R1was oxygen dependent and had moderate impaired cognition. R1's care plan focus dated 8/12/25, identified R1 was at risk for respiratory impairment with a goal to not develop acute respiratory distress. Interventions were as followed: administer medications as ordered; administer oxygen as ordered; encourage deep breathing exercises; and elevate head of bed. R1's physician orders included the following:-Ventolin (inhaler used to treat or prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurate, and readily accessible medical record for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for medical record accuracy. Findings include:R1's face sheet dated 9/10/25, identified diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), asthma (a condition in which a person's airway becomes inflamed, narrow, and swell, and produce mucus).R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1was oxygen dependent. R1's care plan focus dated 8/12/25, identified R1 was at risk for respiratory impairment with a goal to not develop acute respiratory distress. Interventions were as followed: administer medications as ordered; administer oxygen as ordered; encourage deep breathing exercises; and elevate head of bed.R1's physician orders included the following:-Oxygen continuous at 3 liters/minute (L/min) via nasal cannula (NC) (start date 8/12/25 with an end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to review and update the facility assessment to identify the facility's staffing plan for number of staff needed to ensure sufficient qualified staff were available to meet residents' needs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 51 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:The facility assessment dated [DATE], identified Staffing Levels Process: As potential residents are referred for intake into our community, they are evaluated by the nursing department, DON, Unit Manager, in conjunction with other members of the IDT Team to assure that we are capable of meeting their individual needs. We may also review the potential resident with our regional directors for guidance and support. If necessary, a call can be made to our Medical Director. At times a face-to-face assessment may be attained. The staffing ratios are fluid and vary day to day and shift to shift. The staffing is based on resident need. Needs such as two person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance committee effectively identified quality deficiencies, developed and implemented appropriate actions; and provided its written Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan when requested at the time of survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 51 residents in the facility at the time of the survey.Findings include:During an interview on 7/29/25 at 10:56 a.m., documentation and evidence of the facilities ongoing QAPI program was requested. [NAME] president of success (VPS)-A stated she would have to check with the corporate office due to QAPI minutes being protected by their legal team. The director of nursing (DON) stated the QAA team meets monthly, the committee members include myself, the executive director, pharmacist, medical director, social worker, managers from nursing, dietary, housekeeping, medical records personnel, scheduler, human resources, maintenance, and the business office manager. DON was unable to articulate the date of the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and program identified, analyzed, implemented corrective actions, and re-evaluated corrective actions to address adverse events and quality deficiencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 51 residents in the facility. Actual harm occurred related to the quality of care to one resident (R1).Findings include:During an interview on 7/29/25 at 10:56 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the QA committee meets monthly. We discuss quality issues and get feedback form our IDT team. DON indicated the facility was cited previously for failure to comprehensively assess falls, root cause analysis, putting appropriate interventions in place and failure to implement the care plan. DON stated after the last fall citation the facility received their plan of correction identified to do fall audits from 2/12/25 to 3/11/25. DON indicated as part of the audit they ensured a fall intervention was put in place and ensured the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-29 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) consisted of the required members and to meet at least quarterly, which had the potential to affect all 51 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During an interview on 7/29/25 at 10:56 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the QAA team meets monthly, the committee members include myself, the executive director, pharmacist, medical director, social worker, managers from nursing, dietary, housekeeping, medical records personnel, scheduler, human resources, maintenance, and the business office manager. DON was unable to articulate the date of the last meeting but stated it was in June 2025 sometime. DON indicated that the executive director was the contact person for the QAA committee, was responsible for documentation of QAPI meeting minutes and was currently on vacation.The facility provided quality meeting documentation, including QAPI Committee attendance signature logs for meetings held between January 2025 and June 2025. However, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R1) received a copy of their medical record per request in a timely manner, within 2 working days upon request excluding weekends and holidays. Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], noted R1 had moderately impaired cognition. Section F identified preferences for customary routine and activities. Interview for daily preferences indicated it was very important to have family, or a close friend involved in discussions about your care.R1's Medical Record Request form dated 7/1/25, identified family member (FM)-A requested R1's entire medical record from 5/19/25 until 6/11/25. The facility form was signed by FM-A and director of nursing (DON) on 7/1/25.During a phone interview on 7/23/25 at 1:09 p.m., FM-A stated for the last three- and one-half weeks, she had been trying to get R1's medical records and still had not received them. FM-A indicated she spoke with the DON on 7/1/25, she had her fill out a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was revised and updated as needed to meet 1 of 1 resident (R1) toileting needs reviewed for falls.R1's admission Evaluation dated 5/19/25, identified under section J., R1 was incontinent of bladder more than a month, but less than a year. R1 was wet one to two times daily during the day and the nighttime, also exhibited dribbling. Bladder incontinence care plan identified a goal will be maintained in as clean and dry dignified state as possible. Continence in the last 14 days identified R1 was frequently incontinent of bladder daily but some control present.R1's baseline care plan dated 5/19/25, at 7:30 p.m., identified initial goals were to rehab and go home. Section titled, Personal Care, had a list of tasks going down the page vertically, that included: bath/shower, skin care, brushing teeth/dentures, shaving, hair care, dressing/undressing, walking, bathroom needs, eating, exercise and moving in chair/bed and other.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to maintain or restore bladder continence for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls. Findings include:R2's admission Evaluation dated 5/2/25, identified under section J., R2 was continent of bladder.R2's Daily Skilled progress notes from 5/3/25 to 7/2/25, identified R2 was both incontinent and continent of bladder. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had severe cognitive impairment and was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel. R2 had diagnoses of stroke with hemiplegia and urinary retention. R2's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/9/25, identified actual Urinary incontinence. Type of incontinence identified was functional (can't get to toilet in time due to physical disability, external obstacles, or problems thinking or communicating). Alteration in urinary elimination r/t occasional incontinence with need for assistance to complete task. Noted to have underlying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive fall care plan was revised for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for falls. Findings include:R2's care plan identified a focus dated 5/2/25, at risk for falls related to right sided hemiplegia and right sided hemiparesis secondary to a cerebral vascular infarction. Interventions dated 5/2/25, included to encourage to transfer and change positions slowly. 5/9/25 have commonly used articles within easy reach, therapy eval and treat as ordered and use wheelchair for independent locomotion and walker with gait belt and assist of 1 for ambulation. R2's CAA dated 5/9/25, identified Falls an actual problem. No falls noted since admission. Care plan considerations identified R2 had alteration in mobility with risk for falls following hospital stay for pneumonia, underlying hemiplegia, DM, acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), right foot pain, medications that could affect his overall mobility status.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment and implement individuals interventions to ensure a resident who was continent of bladder upon admission received appropriate treatment and services to maintain/restore or prevent increased incontinence for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls.Findings include:R2's admission Evaluation dated 5/2/25, identified under section J., R2 was continent of bladder.R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had severe cognitive impairment and was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel. R2 had diagnoses of stroke with hemiplegia and urinary retention.R2's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/9/25, identified actual urinary incontinence. Type of incontinence identified was functional (can't get to toilet in time due to physical disability, external obstacles, or problems thinking or communicating). Alteration in urinary elimination related to (r/t) occasional incontinence with need for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure dishwashing sanitization at the correct level and was appropriately monitored during dishwashing. Further, staff failed to ensure expired food was identified and removed from a unit refrigerator that stored resident personal food. Findings include: Dishwashing On 1/27/25 at 3:00 p.m., during the kitchen tour dietary aide (DA)-A placed dishes through the dish machine. DA-A stated the wash dial needed to indicate a temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and rinse dial at 140 degrees F. During the observation DA-A placed dishes through the dish machine and the wash dial indicated a temperature of at 130 degrees F and rinse dial at 140 degrees F. A vial of Ecolab chlorine test paper strips was on top of the dish machine. DA-A stated the dish machine sanitized dishes with hot water. DA-A stated the bottle with the test strips were used to test the chemicals of the water after dishwashing was completed. DA-A confirmed she had not checked the chemicals of the water and had already washed dishes. DA-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for 2 of 2 residents (R54, R23) reviewed for medication administration and performed cares on these residents that were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Finding include: R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's), feeding tube, diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, gastrostomy (g-tube, surgical procedure used to insert a tube through the abdomen and into the stomach, and dysphagia (condition that makes it difficult to swallow). R54's care plan revised 1/27/25, indicated at risk for infection r/t (related to) indwelling medical device tube-feeding and interventions included enhanced barrier precautions when performing high-contact care activities. On 1/27/25 at 3:38 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A entered R54's room and failed to don PPE, R54 was lying in bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R6, R49) who were observed to have medications in their rooms, had been appropriately assessed and deemed safe to self-administer medications. Findings include: R6's facesheet printed on 1/28/25, included diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis and dementia. R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R6 had moderately impaired cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R6 required assistance of staff for most activities of daily living (ADL). R6 did not ambulate. R6's physician orders dated 10/28/24, included Voltaren (treats joint and muscle pain) external gel 1%. Apply 2 g (grams) to knees topically as needed for pain four times a day. Orders did not include authorization for self-administration of medication. R6's care plan dated 12/5/23, indicated R6 had pain in her knees related to arthritis and to administer pain medications per physician orders. The care plan did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify resident representatives following falls with subsequent transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents (R20, R164) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R20's facesheet printed on 1/29/25, included diagnoses of chronic kidney disease with heart failure, dependence on renal dialysis, recent femur fracture, morbid obesity and diabetes. R20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R20 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand and be understood. R20 was independent with some activities of daily living (ADL) including eating, toileting, and self-propelling in her wheelchair. R20 was dependent upon staff for dressing, showering and transferring in and out of bed. R20's care plan dated 3/25/18, indicated a history of falls. Care plan dated 12/28/24, indicated R20 had pain and impaired mobility related to recent femur fracture with surgical repair. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 5:12 p.m., R20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R164) reviewed who was newly admitted to the facility. Findings include: R164's facesheet printed on 1/29/25, indicated R164 had been admitted on [DATE]; diagnoses included post-op orthopedic after-care for neck surgery. R164's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R164 had moderate impaired cognition, clear speech, was usually understood and could usually understand. R164 needed assistance with ADLs and did not walk independently. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 4:29 p.m., family member (FM)-B stated neither she nor R164 had received a copy of a care plan after he was admitted on [DATE]. FM-B looked through a folder of all the paperwork she had received from the facility and a baseline care plan was not among them. During review of R164's electronic medical record (EMR), a baseline care plan was not found. During review of R164's paper chart, observed a two-page,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R163) reviewed for urinary catheter. Findings include: R163's facesheet printed on 1/29/25, included a diagnoses of urinary retention. R163's discharge assessment/return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R163 was dependent upon staff for most activities of daily living (ADL) and had an indwelling urinary catheter. R163's physician orders dated 1/27/25, indicated indwelling Foley catheter (drains urine from bladder). R163's care plan dated 1/27/25, did not include R163's urinary retention, use of an indwelling Foley catheter, leg bag, or urinary drainage bag. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 9:02 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-C who was also the MDS nurse stated she added focus areas to resident care plans, as did the nurse manager and director of nursing (DON). RN-C was informed R163's care plan did not include urinary retention or urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and provide ongoing treatment for edema for 1 of 2 residents (R5) who required leg wraps to prevent and treat edema. Findings include: R5's face sheet printed 1/29/25, included diagnoses of pneumonia, urinary tract infection, Alzheimer's disease, traumatic arthropathy (inflammation of joint) left ankle and foot, and patent foramen ovale (flap-valve opening in the heart from right to left of the top two heart chambers which generally closes at birth, causing abnormal flow of blood). R5's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R5 understands and is understood, has moderately impaired cognition, requires moderate to substantial and maximal assist with transfers and walking and has impaired range of motion in both lower extremities. R5 has had multiple falls without major injury and takes anticoagulant, diuretic and opioid medications. R5's provider orders dated 10/21/24, included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and evaluate causal factors for a fall and failed to ensure interventions were implemented to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 2 (R5, R164) who were reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R5's facesheet printed 1/29/25, included diagnoses of pneumonia, urinary tract infection, Alzheimer's disease, traumatic arthropathy (inflammation of joint) left ankle and foot, and patent foramen ovale (flap-valve opening in the heart from right to left of the top two heart chambers which generally closes at birth, causing abnormal flow of blood). R5's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R5 understands and is understood, has moderately impaired cognition, requires moderate to substantial and maximal assist with transfers and walking and has impaired range of motion in both lower extremities. R5 had more than 2 falls without major injury and takes anticoagulant, diuretic and opioid medications. A Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate management of an indwelling catheter was provided for 1 of 1 residents (R163) reviewed for urinary catheter, when his leg bag had not been changed to a urinary drainage bag at night. Findings include: R163's facesheet printed on 1/29/25, included a diagnoses of urinary retention. R163's discharge assessment/return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R163 was dependent upon staff for most activities of daily living (ADL) and had an indwelling urinary catheter. R163's physician orders dated 1/27/25, indicated indwelling Foley catheter (drains urine from bladder). R163's care plan dated 1/27/25, did not include R163's urinary retention, use of an indwelling Foley catheter, leg bag, or urinary drainage bag. During an observation on 1/27/25 at 2:21 p.m., R163 was resting in bed; urinary drainage bag visible. During an observation on 1/28/25 at 10:19 a.m., R163 was sitting on top of his bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a warm and palatable temperature to promote quality of life and nutritional intake for 3 of 3 residents (R6, R9, R35) reviewed for dining. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents who resided on second floor. Findings include: R6's facesheet printed on 1/28/25, included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (when the heart doesn't pump as it should) and diabetes. R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R6 had moderate cognitive impairment and ate independently after set up help. R6 was on a consistent carbohydrate, cardiac diet. R6's care plan dated 11/27/23, indicated her food preferences would be honored. R9's facesheet printed on 1/29/25, included diagnoses of stroke and diabetes. R9's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderate cognitive impairment and ate independently after set-up help. R9 was on a consistent carbohydrate, cardiac diet. R9's care plan dated 1/8/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 tub/shower room on second floor was maintained in good repair and in sanitary conditions for the 30 residents on second floor who could potentially use the area. Findings include: During an observation on 1/28/25 at 2:26 p.m., the second floor tub/shower room had a wall partially enclosing the shower area. The wall was covered with yellow tiles, approximately 4 inches x 4 inches in size. On the lower portion of a wall adjacent to the floor, six tiles were missing creating an opening in which wood and plaster were visible. During an interview and observation on 1/28/25 at 3:52 p.m., along with the corporate maintenance director (CMD), looked at the wall in the tub room. CMD was not aware of the missing tiles and stated maintenance relied on staff to inform them of this sort of thing so it could be repaired. CMD acknowledged this was not sanitary nor a homelike environment for residents. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 8:24 a.m., housekeeper (H)-A stated he was aware of the missing tile and stated he had told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was maintained at proper temperatures to ensure palatability for 6 of 6 residents (R6, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16) interviewed who complained about cold food. Findings include: R6's face sheet dated 10/8/24, identified R6 admitted 4/24. R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R6 was cognitively intact. R6 was independent with meals. R6's Grievance Form completed 9/2/24, inidicated R6 was concerned lunch had not been served until 2:00 p.m. and he had not recieved what was ordered. Additionally, almost every meal lately had been cold. Grievance was reviewed with dietary manager and interdisciplinary team at morning meeting, along with maintenance notified that hot plate warmer needed to be serviced. Corrective action included utilization of a second warmer to warm plates and stainless-steel inserts while repairs done on warmer. Dietary staff retrained on proper temperature procedures and holding temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was delivered according to physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R8's face sheet dated 10/8/24, identified R8's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (condition in which the lungs have trouble loading blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide), interstitial lung disease (progressive scarring of lung tissue), iron deficiency anemia (body does not have enough red blood cells or iron), history of pulmonary embolism (blood clot that blocks the artery in the lung), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R8 did not reject cares. R8 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. R8 did not have shortness of breath. R8's physician orders dated 12/26/23, included oxygen 1 liter per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC) continuously. R8's care plan dated 8/19/24, identified R8 was at risk for respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to label and date food, to remove expired food from food storage areas. In addition , the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning for 1 of 1 commercial mixer, ensure pans in the kitchen were completely dry before storing, accurately monitor chemical sanitization for 1 of 1 dish machine, and perform hand hygiene while serving food. These practices had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors consuming food at the facility. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen's dry storage on 11/29/23 at 10:42 a.m., dietary manager (DM)-H confirmed the following observations: -an undated, opened package of marshmallows, manufacturer's expiration date of July 2023, which was not tied shut. -canned goods were not removed from their shipping flats and shrink wrap, just cut open and cans taken out from the middle. DM-H identified two dented cans of Campbell's Cream of Chicken soup amongst a flat of of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed proper hand hygiene and glove use during meal preparation and distribution of meals, and failed to properly disinfect a glucometer for 1 of 2 residents (R2) . This had the ability to affect all 55 residents who consumed food in the facility. Finding include: Hand Hygiene During an observation on 11/27/23 at 6:53 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-H removed a three-ring binder from a table and brought it to the counter. Without performing hand hygiene, NA-H got a resident meal tray from the delivery cart, removed the plate cover, and cut the sloppy joe into pieces with a fork. NA-H then started stacking plate covers from trays onto the counter, grabbed some ketchup packets, brought them to a resident table and opened one squeezing the contents onto the plate. NA-H then proceeded to gather dirty glasses by the rims, dropped them off at the counter and got two clean mugs, filled them with water and dropped them off at a resident table. During an observation on 11/27/23 at 7:03 p.m., trained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure served meals were provided in a dignified, homelike manner when the residents food was served on trays, second floor dining room was used as a plating and serving area in 1 of 2 dining rooms reviewed. In addition, staff failed to ensure privacy during insulin administration for 1 of 1 resident (R31). Findings include: During observation on 11/27/23 at 5:45 p.m., nine residents were seated in the second floor dining room, no table settings were present, glassware, or décor. The residents were overheard and made comments they wanted to eat, when do we get to eat, I guess we don't get supper tonight, and wonder if we will ever get our food. At 5:47 p.m., dietary manager (DM)-D was observed and brought an insulated cart with plates and cook-(C)-A brought another insulated cart with food and placed the food in the warmers on the steam table located in the second floor dining room. At 5:50 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A and NA-B offered residents seated in the dining room beverages and stated to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and document review the facility failed to ensure all residents were consistently offered and provided a nutrient and/or calorie substantive snack after the dinner meal and before bedtime for 7 of 7 residents (R3, R8, R24, R25, R30, R35, R49) who voiced a concern. Findings include: R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R24's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R25's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R30's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R35's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R49's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition During an interview on 11/28/23 at 2:57 p.m., at a resident council meeting, residents were asked if they received snacks after dinner and before bedtime. All seven residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R51 and R1) who were observed to have medications in their rooms, had been appropriately assessed and deemed safe to self-administer medications. Findings include: R51's facesheet printed on 11/29/23, included a diagnosis of orthopedic after care following surgery for leg amputation. R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R51 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision and hearing, could understand and be understood. R51 required assistance or was dependent upon staff for most activities of daily living. R51's care plan initiated on 10/13/23, did not address self-administration of medications. R51's medical record did not include an assessment for self-administration of medications. R51's physician orders did not include an order for self-administration of medications. During an observation and interview on 11/27/23 2:10 p.m., observed a bottle of Prevagen (memory enhancer)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess the root cause of falls and incorporate new fall interventions to prevent falls and injury for 1 of 1 resident (R45) who had frequent falls. Findings include: R45's facesheet printed on 11/29/23, included diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), arthritis of both knees, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination. R45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R45 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision and hearing, could understand and be understood. R45 was independent in most activities of daily living (ADL's) and did not walk due to medical condition. R45's care plan dated 8/31/22, indicated R45 was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility. Interventions included gripper socks, commonly used articles within easy reach, reinforced need to call for assistance and to wait for assistance with transfers. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement activity programming for 1 out of 3 residents (R15) with dementia residing in a secure dementia care unit. Findings include: R15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia, dementia with mood disturbance, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. R15's MDS identified observation of wandering behavior on up to three of seven days, and very important for her to listen to music she liked, to do things with groups of people, to get fresh air, and to attend religious activities. R15 required extensive assistance with her activities of daily living. R15's care plan identified a focus for activities, initiated on 8/18/23, which included interests of music, pets, group activities, outdoors and religious practices. Facility staff were to provide transport for R15 to and from activities of choice, to attend activity therapy exercise programming,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure an insulin pen stored in the medication cart was labeled for one resident (R31) and the facility failed to ensure eye drops were discarded per manufactures instructions for one resident (R26). Findings include:. R26's medication administration record (MAR) dated [DATE]-[DATE], indicated netarsudil dimesylate (Rhopressa eye drop used to lower eye pressure) ophthalmic solution 0.02 % instill one drop in both eyes at bedtime and Latanoprost (eye drop used to treat certain kinds of glaucoma) instill one drop in both eyes at bedtime. R31's MAR dated [DATE]-[DATE], indicated an order for Novolin N Flexpen subcutaneous suspension pen-injector 100 unit/ml inject 29 unit subcutaneous in the evening. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 6:46 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A removed an insulin pen from R31's labeled designated space from the medication cart, the insulin pen was labeled with a manufacturers sticker with Novolin N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure timely notification of a fall with injury according to the facility policy for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who had a bleeding disorder and a fall with a head injury. Findings include: R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1 had been admitted to the hospital on [DATE], with chief complaint of generalized weakness and acute blood loss anemia. R1 had a history of acquired platelet dysfunction with multiple bleeding events leading to frequent hospitalization. R1 was discharged from the hospital to the facility in stable condition on 10/26/23. R1's Face Sheet identified R1 had diagnoses of myelodysplastic syndrome (a group of cancers in which immature blood cells in the bone marrow do not mature or become healthy blood cells,) thrombocytopenia (a condition that occurs when the platelet count in your blood is too low,) and muscle weakness. R1's care plan dated 10/27/23, did not identify R1 had a bleeding disorder. R1's occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and documents review, the facility failed to include the daily census and actual hours worked by nursing staff groups on the daily staffing data document. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and/or any visitors who may have wanted to view the information.Findings include:During observation on 3/9/26 at 11:30 a.m., upon entry of the survey, the staff posting for 03/09/26 did not show the daily census and actual hours worked by nursing staff groups.During documents review on 3/10/26, daily schedule reports (daily staffing data document) provided by facility for 03/9/26 to 3/13/26 all lacked the daily census and actual hours worked by nursing staff groups.During an interview on 03/12/26 at 10:11 a.m., the scheduler stated there was a change in template in September and the daily census and actual hours worked by nursing staff groups has been missing from the daily staffing data document.During an interview on 03/12/26 11:51 am, the facility administrator acknowledged the daily census and actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-07-29 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for 4 of 5 nursing assistants (NA-A, NA-B, NA-C and NA-D) who had been employed by the facility for over one year.Findings include:NA-A staff listing identified a hire date of 8/22/1996. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.NA-C staff listing identified a hire date of 3/12/2019. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.NA-D staff listing identified a hire date of 1/11/2024. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.NA-E staff listing identified a hire date of 1/4/2023. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.During an interview on 7/28/25 at 11:32 a.m., NA-D stated she had been an employee at the facility for a bout a year and a half and did not remember ever receiving a performance review. During interview on 7/28/25 at 12:30 p.m., NA-A stated she had been employed at the facility for almost 19 years and was unaware of when her last annual performance review was done. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$387,209 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $168,280 — penalty dated 2026-03-12
- $145,385 — penalty dated 2025-07-29
- $73,544 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-14 for 5 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-02 for 33 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSHC WISCONSIN LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 04/04/2017 |
| BAUMANN, TROY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/04/2017 |
| HOEHN, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/04/2017 |
| NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/04/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $340K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245184. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.