Whitewater Health Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 31.5 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, comprehensively assess, implement interventions, and provide timely physician notification for a sudden change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 became unresponsive causing a delay in hospitalization. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on [DATE] when the facility did not complete comprehensive assessments and communicate sudden change of condition to the physician when R1 became unresponsive and remained unresponsive for at least seven (7) hours before the ambulance arrived. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 4:58 p.m. The immediacy of the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 12:43 p.m. but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level 2 (D), which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not IJ. Findings include: R1's hospital after visit summary (AVS) [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment when it was identified a refrigerator used to supply resident supplement drinks were not cleaned. In addition, during dining, meals were served on trays. This failure had an opportunity to affect all residents who received supplemental drinks and who received meals in the dining rooms.Findings include:During the initial kitchen tour on 6/29/2026 at 10:35 a.m., with cook (C)-A verified the refrigerator in the dining room where the residents house supplement is kept had a large amount of ice built up on the top freezer part with an unknown item within the ice. C-A indicated uncertain who was in charge to clean, monitor or who to report it to. During an interview on 7/01/2026 at 11:45 a.m., maintenance-B said when staff have things that need to be looked at, they are to place a ticket in the TELS. Maintenance-B indicated the TELS is where we would get notified of something needing fixed.During an observation and interview on 7/01/2026 5:50 p.m., administrator verified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain equipment in good working order for 1 kitchen dishwashing system and surrounding area.Findings include:During the initial kitchen tour on 6/29/2026 at 10:35 a.m., [NAME] (C)-A identified dishwater and off to the left underneath counter a metal device with a large amount of water flowing from it. surrounding the device the tile floor was buckled and the trim around the perimeter of the wall was peeled back. C-A indicated maintenance has known of the water leak for about a month.During an observation and interview on 7/01/2026 at 11:45 a.m., maintenance (M)-B was asked to review the leak in the kitchen. After walking in the kitchen, M-B quickly went to the area and turned the water off. M-B was made aware on 6/30/26 from M-A. M-B indicated staff are to use the TELS system (a systems to give updates to maintenance of things needing attention). He reviewed TELS and verified staff did not report. M-B confirmed the damage was not new and should have been reported sooner. M-B indicated a plumber will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain dignity when it was identified a brace was not cleaned regularly for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for dignity.Findings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/11/26, indicated R1 was not cognitively impaired. In addition, needed partial to moderate assistance to dress upper body.R1's care plan includes a focus for ADL (activity of daily living) assist of one staff for dressing, related to recurrent dislocation of right shoulder, and at risk for loss of range of motion and to apply device (specify-immobilizer) per physician orders.R1's orders include, the immobilizer should be removed twice daily, including for showers, to check underlying skin to ensure no rubbing. The immobilizer should be on at all times, otherwise.During an observation on 6/29/2026 at 4:57 p.m. R1 had a brace on right shoulder which wrapped around his trunk. The brace is dirty and or stained.During an observation and interview on 7/01/2026 at 12:03 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A indicated there is an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review facility failed to notify the physician with a change of condition for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for discharge.Findings include:R31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/7/26 includes intact cognition with no mood or behaviors. R31's focus care plan indicates residents shows potential for discharge, will be discharged to home when clinical and rehabilitation goals are met.R31's physician encounter visit dated 3/24/26, indicates Nursing home discharge. Discharge preparation time spent with patient 40 minutes including the following tasks, reviewed the electronic medical record, updating epic problem list, medication,. time electronically signed 4:35 p.m., with another date and time of 3/27/26 at 2:25 p.m.R31's patient message dated 3/24/26 at 4:36 p.m., indicates discharge recommendation faxed to facility on 3/24/26 at 4:50 p.m.R31's record lacked communication with the provider R31 remained in the facility after signed discharged orders were received.R31's physician became aware R31 remained in the facility on 4/15/26 when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to appropriately assess and reevaluate interventions discussed in a timely manner to help prevent future falls for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents who had 23 falls.Findings include:R1 admitted to the facility 1/20/2026R1's care plan focus area dated 1/21/26 indicated R1 is at increased risk for actual fall related to history of (h/o) falls, impaired decision making, failure to recognize physical limitations, impaired safety awareness, and attempts to self-transfer. R1's goal is to minimize risk of falls. Original interventions included; ensure R1 is wearing appropriate footwear (gripper socks or shoes), have commonly used articles within easy reach, provide assist to transfer and ambulate as needed, reinforce wheelchair safety as needed such as locking brakes, report development of pain, bruises, change in mental status, ADL function, appetite, or neurological status post fall, and therapy to work on transfer, walking, strengthen.R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions requested by the resident for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for bladder incontinence.Findings include:R5 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], included intact cognition, no mood or behaviors, frequently incontinent with no toileting program.R5's care plan focus area for urinary incontinence related to functional incontinence with an intervention of a toileting plan: check and change every 2 hours starting in the am, between meals and at 10:30 p.m., then at 2-3 a.m., last check at 5a.m.During an observation and interview on 6/29/2026 at 3:52 p.m., R5 lying in bed when asked about going to the bathroom, R5 said, she does not make it to the restroom all the time. Staff are to check and change her or go to the bathroom every two hours. R5 continues and said it does not happen all the time and added some staff are better than others. R5's care conference summary dated 4/2/26 reads resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a medical record that was complete, accurate and readily accessible for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for death record.Findings include:R29's Hospital Discharge summary revealed being discharged to the nursing home on [DATE] in stable condition.R29's Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated [DATE] reads attempt CPR.R29's death record reads date of death [DATE]R29's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicates death in facility.R29's progress lacked documentation of R29 death in the facility or what had happened.R29's encounter date [DATE] at 9:58 a.m., received call R29 passed away this morning, CPR started, 911 called.State agency asked for R29's incident report and or medical record to include items that would have anything to do with the day of R29's death. Upon follow of request, it was brought to the attention there was no incident report or progress note of what occurred the day of R29's death.During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to ensure enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) needs were identified and addressed for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for indwelling catheters.Findings include:R1R1's admission record dated 3/31/26, indicated R1 had benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract symptoms. R1's order summary report dated 3/31/26, indicated R1 had an indwelling urinary catheter.R1's care plan dated 4/14/26, indicated R1 had an indwelling foley catheter. R1's care plan failed to include R1's need for EBPs as well as interventions related to this need.R1's medical record lacked evidence to ensure staff were knowledgeable in R1's need for EBPs. During an observation on 4/15/26 at 10:12 a.m., R1 was observed sleeping in his recliner. The door to the room was open and R1's foley catheter leg bag was visible attached to R1's leg. R1 did not have any signage or supplies for EBPs at his room door.R2R2's admission record dated 3/27/26, indicated R2 had benign prostatic hyperplasia with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required nurse staffing information was posted daily. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility and/or visitors who may wish to see the information.Findings include:During an observation on 4/15/26 at 9:59 a.m., the facility nurse staffing information was not observed on the administrator's office door.During an observation on 4/15/26 at 10:16 a.m., the primary areas, hallways, and entrance of the facility was observed, and no facility nurse staffing information was observed.On 4/15/26 at 11:23 a.m., the administrator stated she was responsible for posting nurse staffing information and it would have been located on her office door, but it was not because she had not printed or posted it. It was expected that the nurse staffing information is posted seven days a week.The facility policy titled Nurse Staffing Postage Information revised 10/13/22, indicated staffing information would be readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines to reduce the risk of infection spread for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for an indwelling catheter.Findings include:R1's admission record dated 3/31/26, indicated R1 had benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract symptoms.R1's order summary report dated 3/31/26, indicated R1 had an indwelling urinary catheter.R1's care plan dated 4/14/26, indicated R1 had an indwelling foley catheter. R1's medical record lacked evidence to ensure staff were knowledgeable in R1's need for EBPs.During an observation on 4/15/26 at 10:12 a.m., R1 was observed sleeping in his recliner. The door to the room was open and R1's foley catheter leg bag was visible attached to R1's leg. R1 did not have any signage or supplies for EBPs at his door.During an observation on 4/15/26 at 11:40 a.m., physical therapist (PT)-A was in R1's bathroom assisting him out of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,452 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,452 — penalty dated 2024-08-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $176K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN