Elroy Health Services
307 Royall Ave, Elroy, WI 53929 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (608) 462-8491 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $33,320 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-01)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.6% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.9% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.6% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.9% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.4% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.1% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.3% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.3% | 15.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.4% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.9% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.2% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 1.66 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.50 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.0%CMS range 34.7–56.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.3–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 17.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.7–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents and hazards for 1 of 1 Residents reviewed for smoking (R51).On 4/5/26, R51 was observed by staff to be smoking an illegal substance in his room. R51 had a history of illicit drug use, however, this was not addressed upon R51's admission. No monitoring was put in place for R51 regarding the use of illegal substances. R51 has a roommate, and residents in rooms near R51 use oxygen.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and protect residents from smoking in the facility and illegal substance use created a finding of immediate jeopardy (IJ) that began on 4/5/26. Surveyor notified NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and VPS E (Vice President of Success) of the immediate jeopardy on 5/7/26 at 1:50 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 5/7/26. However, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity of D (potential for more than minimal harm/isolated) as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice (SOP), to prevent pressure injuries (PI) and each resident with PIs receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new injuries from developing for 2 of 5 residents (R35 and R44) reviewed for pressure injuries. R35 was at risk for PI development. R35 developed two stage 3 facility acquired PIs that deteriorated. Observations were made of multiple layers between R35 and the air mattress. The facility failed to provide education and/or risks vs benefits when R35 declined repositioning. Staff did not ensure consistent documentation of repositioning or incontinence care, which were noted contributors to R35's PIs. Staff did not protect R35's periwound when applying the prescribed treatment. The facility's failures to implement preventive interventions for residents at risk for PIs, failure to provide education and/or risks vs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R2). R2 had a fall on 5/29/25. PA D (Physician Assistant) ordered x-rays STAT (right away) due to complaints of pain to right wrist and right hip. X-rays did not get completed as ordered. R2 was shaking due to severe pain the next morning and was sent to the hospital. R2 was diagnosed with a fracture to the right hip and pelvis as well as avulsion (a small piece of bone pulled off the wrist bone, causing a small fracture) to right wrist. The facility's failure to get the x-rays completed STAT as ordered resulted in a delay in treatment for R2. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Change in Condition, dated 9/20/22, states, in part: . A facility should immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for falls. R3's family provided information related to R3's familiar routine and preferences. The facility failed to get this information on R3's baseline care plan, on R3's comprehensive care plan, or get it to the front line staff to use for fall prevention. R3's alarm did not sound when she self transferred. R3 fell and sustained a hip fracture. The facility's management staff reported to Surveyor that R3 has behaviors of deactivating her alarm system. R3's medical record does not contain goals, monitoring, or interventions related to this behavior in regard to fall prevention. Facility staff used education with R3 as an intervention for fall prevention when R3 was only oriented to self, noted to be confused at baseline, was assessed to have severe cognitive impairment, and have a diagnosis of Alzheimer's. Evidenced by: Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately notify and consult with a resident's physician when there was a change in condition. This occurred for 2 of 5 Residents (R68 & R6) reviewed for notification of change in condition. On 10/26/25, R68 had a BP (Blood Pressure) of 68/52, was feeling dizzy and lightheaded. Throughout the night R68 had BPs readings of 80/40, 89/56, and 94/58. The next morning on 10/27/25 at 9:15 AM, R68 had a fall. The facility did not notify physician of change in condition throughout the night. On 3/5/26, the facility sent an e-Interact communication to the provider of R6's change of condition. The facility did not follow up with the provider regarding the change of condition to get any new orders or monitoring recommendations for R6 for several hours, after the change of condition was noted. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy, entitled Change in Condition of the Resident, dated 9/20/22, states, in part: . Policy: A facility should immediately inform the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility did not provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC); thus, did not provide the notice of Medicare services ending and the accurate potential financial liability to residents whose Medicare coverage was ending for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R48).R48 was receiving Medicare A benefits. R48 was not provided with the NOMNC and SNFABN form thus not being provided with the accurate financial liability. Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notice dated 5/12/25 states in part .5. To ensure that the resident, or representative, has enough time to make a decision whether or not to receive the services in question and assume financial responsibility, the notice shall be provided at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending. The notices must nit be provided while the resident/ representative is under duress or in an emergency situation.R48's Medicare coverage ended on 4/22/26. R48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 16 sampled Residents (R7).R7 reported that facility staff do not assist with shaving, despite R7 having their own shaver. R7 noted to have approximately 1/4 facial hair on their chin.Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) dated 7/26/22 states in part .3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by significant mood swings, including manic (or hypomanic) episodes and depressive episodes), dementia, polyneuropathy (nerve disease caused by damage to many nerves, often due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 2 residents (R43) reviewed for transportation for medical appointments. R43 had a medical appointment scheduled for 5/4/26 and the facility failed to arrange transportation. Evidenced by: The facility does not have a transportation policy. R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cognitive communication deficit (a condition where cognitive impairments disrupt a person's ability to communicate effectively, despite intact language or speech abilities), cirrhosis of liver (a complication of long-term inflammation of the liver. It results in the replacement of healthy liver tissue with scar tissue, called fibrosis), alcohol abuse, and hepatitis C (a liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus).R43's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/30/36 states that R43 has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 2 errors out of 39 opportunities that affected 2 out of 5 residents (R54 & R46) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 5.13%.R54's orders include levothyroxine daily at 5:30 AM. Staff administered R54's levothyroxine at 8:09 AM. Staff administered R54's levothyroxine and calcium at the same. Staff administered R54's levothyroxine at the wrong time and against manufacturer's directions not to administer with Calcium.Staff administered R46's levothyroxine at 7:46 AM. The order is to administer levothyroxine at 6:00 AM. Staff administered this medication late.Evidenced by:The facility policy entitled Medication Administration, dated 1/26, states, in part: . POLICY: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for receiving a psychotropic medication were free from unnecessary drugs. R3 receives Olanzapine, an antipsychotic medication, for Alzheimer's disease with late onset. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications, reviewed 4/27/25, includes: it is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medications when other non-pharmacological interventions are clinically contradicted. Additionally these medications should only be used to treat residents medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience, which would deem it a chemical restraint. Adequate indications for use refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after any other treatments have been deemed clinically contradicted. For psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident (R). This has the potential to affect all 68 residents residing at the facility. Surveyors entered on the weekend due to the facility triggering for low weekend staffing. NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated the schedule is based on the census and hours per patient day (HPPD), which does not take into consideration the acuity of the facility's resident population. Residents in Resident Council voiced concerns that staff take too long to answer call lights and meal trays on the halls are not passed timely due to staff not being available. R56 voiced concerns about long wait times when wanting to get up. Staff stated there are care items they cannot complete for residents due to having low staffing. This is evidenced by: The Facility Assessment Tool, date 1/3/25, states in part:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 68 residents who reside at the facility. Surveyor observed dietary aide without a beard restraint in the kitchen. Surveyor observed garbage cans near the food prep area without lids. Surveyor observed spilled food or drink in the walk-in fridge. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Employee Sanitary Practices- Food and Nutrition Services, dated, 7/27/22, states, in part; .All food and nutrition services employees will practice good personal hygiene and safe food handling procedures .1. Wear hair restraints (hairnet, beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting exposed food . On 2/16/25 at 9:45 AM, Dietary Manager K (DM) and Surveyor toured the kitchen. Surveyor observed Dietary Aide L (DA) in the kitchen not wearing a beard restraint. Surveyor observed garbage cans near the food prep area without lids. Surveyor observed yellow substance spilled in the walk-in refrigerator. DM K…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 68 residents (R) residing in the facility. The facility's outbreak that started in October 2024 was resolved too early. Facility staff were unaware of their current outbreak and were not following proper source control during the outbreak. Staff surveillance was not complete for staff illnesses and staff returned to work too early from illnesses. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 7/23/24, states in part: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 20 sampled residents (R316) and 6 of 12 supplemental residents ((R15, R11, R30, R18, R26, R42). R316, R42, R15, R11, R30, R18, and R26 indicated that the dining room was very cold, and they were wearing jackets or wrapped in blankets to stay warm. Resident Council meeting minutes dated 1/23/25, indicated the facility was aware that residents had concerns of it being too cold in the dining room. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Safe and Homelike Environment Policy, dated 6/16/22, includes in part . Definitions: Comfortable and safe temperature levels means that the ambient temperature should be in a relatively narrow range that minimizes residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia/hyperthermia and is comfortable for the residents . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 7. The facility will maintain comfortable and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support resident choice of activities, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident for 2 (R38 and R58) of 20 total sampled Residents and 2 (R33 and R25) of 12 supplemental residents who reside on D Hallway. Surveyor observed R38, R58, R33 and R25 from 2/16/25-2/18/25. The facility did not provide residents with meaningful activities. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Activities, dated 7/11/22, states, in part; .2. Activities will be designed with the intent to: a. Enhance the resident's sense of well-being, belonging, and usefulness. b. Promote or enhance physical activity. c. Promote or enhance cognition. d. Promote or enhance emotional health. e. Promote self-esteem, dignity, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity, success and independence. f. Reflect resident's interests and age. g. Reflect cultural and religious interests of the residents. h. Reflect choices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were ensured a dignified existence and self-determination for 1 of 20 sampled residents (R316). R316 voiced concerns that he had no clothes to wear and was forced to wear a hospital gown all the time, including to the dining room for meals. As evidenced by: The Facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 9/2017, states, in part: Purpose: To ensure that resident rights are respected, protected, and promoted . Procedure: Residents will be treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident will be given in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life and recognizes each resident's individuality . 38. All facility staff are to encourage residents to exercise their rights by providing choices . R316 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R316's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices and preferences for 1 (R44) of 20 sampled residents and 1 (R15) of 12 supplemental residents reviewed. R44 and R15 voiced concerns with receiving eggs almost every day for breakfast. R44 and R15 indicated they shared this concern, and it has not been corrected. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 7/22, states, in part; .17. The resident has the right and this facility promotes and support the right to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility that are significant to the resident . Example 1 R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R44's most recent MDS dated [DATE] states that R44 has a BIMS of 15 out of 15, indicating that R44 is cognitively intact. R44's most recent Nutritional Assessment, states, in part; .preferences: see tray card . On 2/19/25 at 8:33 AM, R44 indicated most mornings she receives scrambled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all incidents involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the incident, if the events involve abuse to the appropriate agencies for 2 of 2 resident-to-resident abuse allegations (R50 and R53). R50 has a history of being verbally aggressive towards others. R50 was verbally aggressive towards R53 and made him cry on 2/10/25. The UC J (Unit clerk), NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator), DON B (Director of Nursing), and RN I (Registered Nurse), were aware of this incident, but it was not reported to the state agency. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2/2018 with a revision date of 7/15/22, states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse . Definitions: Verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 2 Residents (R50 and R53) reviewed for abuse. On 2/10/25, the facility became aware of an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse between R50 and R53 and did not conduct a thorough investigation. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2/2018 with a revision date of 7/15/22, states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse . Definitions: Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communications or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not develop and implement a Comprehensive Resident-Centered Care Plan for 1 of 20 total sampled residents (R23). R23's medical record indicates he has schizoaffective disorder and behaviors. R23's comprehensive care plan does not include a care plan with goals or interventions that included monitoring and supervision, related to inappropriate behaviors. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 9/23/22, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives, and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the residents comprehensive care plan. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents (R50) reviewed for dementia care out of a total sample of 20 residents. R50 has a diagnosis of dementia. R50 has a history of exhibiting verbally aggressive and socially inappropriate/disruptive behavior towards staff and other residents. The facility staff did not provide person-centered services to maintain R50's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Dementia Care, dated 4/23/24, states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide the appropriate treatment and services for residents who display signs of, or are diagnosed with dementia, to meet his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that privacy was maintained for one resident (R1) of 14 residents reviewed. Specifically, R1's positive COVID status was announced in front of residents and a hospice staff member. Additionally, the Social Services Director (SSD) discussed R1 not following the facility's smoking protocol in the common area making R1 feel scared and uncomfortable. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Rights of Residents in Wisconsin Nursing Facilities included .The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality .The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records .The facility must respect the resident's right to personal privacy, including the right to privacy in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADL) assistance was provided for 1 resident (R1) of 15 residents reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, R1 was not provided assistance with showering/bathing for 21 days while on COVID quarantine. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) revised 07/26/24 stated The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care . Review of the facility's Shower Schedule provided by the facility indicated that R1 was to be showered on Monday's of each week. Review of Critical Event Analysis and Action Plan Worksheet provided by the Administrator and dated 11/06/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that quality of care/treatment were provided to one resident (R6) of 12 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a timely assessment for R6 after she sustained a fall. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines revised on 07/18/24 and provided by the facility stated, .When a resident experiences a fall, the facility will: A. Complete a post-fall assessment and review: 1) Physical assessment with vital signs 2) Neuro checks for any unwitnessed fall or witnessed fall where resident hits their head: Initially, then hourly x 3 then continue neuro checks every 4 hours x 6, then continue neuro checks every 8 hours x 6 or as indicated by the physician. Alert MD [Medical Doctor] of any abnormal findings from neuro checks - do not wait until series is complete to notify MD of abnormal findings .B. Complete an incident report in Risk Management. C. Notify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure that qualify of care/treatment were provided to 1 residents (R3) of 12 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to wound care for R3. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries revised 07/20/22 and provided by the facility stated, .For those residents admitted with, or who subsequently developed a pressure injury or impaired skin integrity, they will receive care, treatment, and services that seek to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent further development of pressure injuries/impaired skin integrity . The facility did not provide a policy related to following physician's orders. Review of R3's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. Review of R3's Care Plan provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 6 of 9 sampled residents (R2, R1, R5, R3, R8, and R7). R8 and R7 indicated they have not had a working sink in their bathroom for over a week and have to go down the hallway in order to complete their personal hygiene. R2, R1, R5, and R3 voiced concerns regarding not having any hot water for about 3 weeks. Grievance Form, dated 7/12/24, indicates the facility has had concerns of no hot water since 7/12/24. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 6/16/22, includes in accordance with residents' rights the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible . A home-like environment is one that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting . a determination of home-like should include the resident's opinion of the living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide showers to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance (R1, R2, R5, R3). R1, R2, R3, and R5 indicated they have missed showers due to the facility not having hot water. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), dated 7/26/22, includes: The facility will . ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following ADLs: bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, transfer, ambulation, toileting, eating, using speech . A resident who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary services to maintain good . grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Example 1 R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/24 indicates R1's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that self-administration of medications was determined to be clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 9 residents. Surveyor observed R2 holding a med cup of pills in her room without staff present. The facility did not complete a self-administration of medication assessment on R2 and R2 did not have a physician order for administering her own medications. Evidenced by: The facility's policy, entitled Self-Administration by Resident, dated 2007, includes: Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so with a prescriber's order and if the nursing center interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe, and the medications are appropriate and safe for self-administration . R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. R2's most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to the appropriate agencies in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 1 sampled residents (R7). R7 voiced an allegation of abuse to Surveyor and to the facility using the grievance process. The facility failed to report the allegation of abuse to the state agency immediately within 2 hours. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 7/15/2022, includes: . Verbal abuse- means the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds . includes disparaging language and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . Identification of abuse, neglect, or exploitation: . Verbal abuse of a resident overheard or inappropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R7). R7 voiced an allegation of abuse to Surveyor and to facility using the grievance process. The facility failed to protect R7 and failed to conduct a thorough investigation of the incident. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, dated 7/15/22, includes: .Verbal abuse- means the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds . includes disparaging language and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . Identification of abuse, neglect, or exploitation: . Verbal abuse of a resident overheard or inappropriate verbal conduct overheard . Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect, exploitation: An immediate investigation is warranted when allegation or suspicion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure resident environments remained free of potential accidents/hazards for 3 of 9 residents (R6, R4, and R9) reviewed for hot water temperatures. R6, R4, and R9 voiced concerns of their water being too hot. Surveyor recorded unsafe temperatures on her thermometer of R6's, R4's, and R9's bathroom water. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Safe Water Temperatures, dated 6/16/2022, includes, in part: It is the policy of the facility to maintain appropriate water temperatures in resident care areas. Direct staff will monitor residents during prolonged exposure to warm or hot water for any signs or symptoms of burns and will respond appropriately. Staff will be educated on safe water temperatures upon employment and on a regular basis. Water temperatures will be set to a temperature of no more than the state's allowable maximum water temperature . According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, reviewed 2/3/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that every resident was treated with dignity and respect when providing activities of daily living (ADL) for 2 of 17 residents (R21 & R24) reviewed for resident rights of a total sample of 20. R21 indicated to Surveyor a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) put an incontinence product on her instead of assisting R21 to the bathroom. R21 does not use incontinence products. The facility did not ensure that R24 was treated with dignity and respect when providing activities of daily living (ADL). Evidenced by: The facility Rights of Residents in Wisconsin Nursing Facilities, in the Facility's New admission Packet, undated, states, in part: . Resident Rights: Residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 2 residents (R4 and R52) reviewed for Restorative Nursing Programming. R4 was discharged from therapy with a Restorative Nursing Program in place, Restorative Nursing Program was not being completed as directed by therapy. R52 was discharged from therapy with a Restorative Nursing Program in place, Restorative Nursing Program was not being completed as directed by therapy. This is evidenced by: Example 1 R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, weakness, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, history of stroke, and neuropathy. R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R4 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, indicating that R4 is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicates that R4 requires supervision/ touching assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (R32) of 7 reviewed out of a total sample of 20 residents receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. R32 has PICA (put non-edible items in mouth.) The facility failed to ensure R32's Comprehensive Care Plan included details of the behavior, what items R32 will attempt to eat, what staff should do if they observe R32 put item in mouth, personalized interventions, and a system to track the incidents to ensure all staff provide adequate supervision and ensure the environment is as safe as possible. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled, NSG (Nursing) Accidents and Supervision, Revised date, 7/14/22, states, in part; .Policy: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). 2. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status and weight. This affected 1 (R8) of 1 resident's reviewed for nutrition and hydration out of a total sample of 20 residents. The facility failed to follow the Registered Dietician's recommendation regarding weekly weights to be completed for R8 after R8 experienced weight loss. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled, Weight Monitoring, revised date 12/21/22, states, in part; .Policy The interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight change for our residents 7. The Dietician will review the monthly weights to follow individual weight trends over time. Weight trends will be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met . R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including weakness, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, non-pressure chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs. This affected 1 of 2 resident's (R6) reviewed for antibiotic use. R6 was receiving an antibiotic to which she was resistant. This is evidenced by: R6 is a new admission to the facility. R6 has the following diagnoses: acute cystitis without hematuria, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. R6's Discharge summary dated [DATE] contains the following antibiotic order: Trimethoprim 100 mg (milligrams) po (by mouth) at bedtime. R6's Clinical Laboratory Report dated 1/2/24 documents .Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole >= 320 R . This means that R6 is resistant to Trimethoprim and it will not be effective for her. R6's care plan documents the following: Actual infection UTI (Urinary Tract Infections)- Has recurring UTI's on prophylactic ABT (antibiotic). Will have no further complication r/t (related to) infection through review date. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to provide infection prevention procedures for 5 of 10 residents (R5, R6, R7, R4, and R3) during wound care, incontinence care, and when an infestation of maggots was found in R3's wound. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was clean and used exclusively for the resident intended. Specifically, bedpans and bath basins were unmarked, unbagged, and stored on the bathroom floors. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 12/12/23 between 9:30 AM and 10:00 AM, with DON B (Director of Nursing) revealed RN D (Registered Nurse) provided wound care to R5. RN D removed wound care items from the cart and placed them on top of the cart without wiping it with a disinfectant. RN D carried a plastic medicine cup of betadine, cotton swabs, and unpackaged gauze pads in her hands and entered R5's room. RN D placed the wound care items on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms were clean and homelike. Specifically, two bathrooms (Rooms E5 and B8) on 2 of 4 resident care areas had toilet supports with rusted metal and stained pieces of wood. In addition, the floors in three bathrooms were stained and dirty (Rooms E5, B8, and D1). Findings include: During an observation on 12/12/23 at 11:10 AM the bathroom in E5 was inspected for cleanliness. The bathroom had a toilet support with rusted support brackets. The support brackets were attached to a piece of unpainted wood that rested on the floor. The piece of wood was stained. The toilet had a buildup of dried feces and the floor under the toilet was stained with yellow and brown stains. During an observation with NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) on 12/12/23 at 12:10 PM the bathroom in D1 was inspected for cleanliness. The bathroom toilet bowl was heavy with dark yellow stains covering the entire bowl. The floor under the toilet was stained with yellow and brown stains. There were two broken pieces of a plastic toilet brush…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$33,320 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $33,320 — penalty dated 2025-07-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/31/2024 |
| BAUMANN, TROY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/19/2017 |
| HOEHN, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/19/2017 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/22/2018 |
| CONTINUUM THERAPY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2018 |
| NSH REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WIPFLI LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| BELONGIA, CHRISTINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
| GEE, DARREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/30/2021 |
| GREER, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/29/2023 |
| HIRST, COLIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/31/2021 |
| OROURKE, KATHERINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| PATZER, COLLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/14/2023 |
| PURTELL, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
| 307 ROYALL AVENUE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/31/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $353K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525452. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.