Menomonee Falls Health Services
N84 W17049 Menomonee Ave, Menomonee Falls, WI 53051 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (262) 255-1180 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $214,308 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.8% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.8% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.1% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.9% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.9% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.5% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.5% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 8.2–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 81.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 36.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 6 residents (R6, R1, R10, and R22) reviewed for accidents. * On 2/13/2025, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transferred R6 not according to R6’s plan of care and bumped R6’s leg. R6 required surgical intervention to R6’s right leg as a result of the CNA not following R6’s plan of care for transferring. * R1 had a fall on 4/11/2025 and no documentation was located that the facility did a thorough investigation. * R22 had a fall out of bed when staff did not follow R22’s plan of care. R22 was receiving cares with assist of one when R22 rolled out of bed. R22’s plan of care was to have assist of 2. * R10’s Wanderguard was incorrectly placed on R10’s wheelchair according to the manufacturer guidelines. R10’s Wanderguard was placed directly on metal which would inhibit the Wanderguard from functioning properly. Findings include: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R7) reviewed. * R5, who was assessed to be at risk for pressure injuries, developed a stage 3 ischium pressure injury identified on 11/21/24. R5's care plan was not updated with new offloading interventions after the development of the ischium pressure injury. On 11/21/24, Wound Doctor (WD)-H recommended to upgrade offloading chair cushion. This was not completed by the facility. WD-H's treatment orders were not initiated until 11/26/24. During the survey process, Surveyor observed R5 to not be repositioned at least every 2 hours and R5 was not wearing heel boots at all times per R5's plan of care. * R7 was admitted with a Deep Tissue Injury to the left heel. Registered Nurse (RN)-D had inaccurate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility did not ensure that residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and to ensure residents do not develop pressure injuries unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates they were unavoidable; and residents with pressure injuries receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 (R5 and R26) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R5 developed a facility acquired, stage 3, pressure injury. R26 developed a facility acquired stage 3 pressure injury on the coccyx on 4/4/24. This pressure injury was assessed on 4/5/24 as a Stage 2 pressure injury. A comprehensive assessment was not completed as there was no documentation of the percentage of the wound bed. The pressure injury was incorrectly staged as a Stage 2 as the coccyx pressure injury had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) The facility policy entitled Smoking Policy revised 7/14/2022 states: To identify factors that may put residents at risk for smoking or nicotine use independently and to provide appropriate supervision/approaches for safety. This center shall establish and maintain a safe resident environment, while maintain resident rights, smoking or nicotine use will be limited to designated areas, supervision, and safety plans. Those residents who wish to engage in these practices will be educated, assessed, and provided with appropriate supervision to safely do so. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 2. Risk factors identified through the assessment process shall be used in the development of the plan of care. 5. If a resident is deemed to be unsafe, they will be required to use a smoking apron, extender, or gloves and they may be required to smoke with supervision only. 9. Residents who are assessed to require supervised smoking will have nicotine materials secured in a container that is maintained by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries, and with pressure injuries, were comprehensively assessed with an individualized plan of care. This was observed with 2 (R1, R2) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure injuries, and at risk for pressure injury. *R1 was assessed at high risk for pressure injuries. The facility did not initiate a turning or repositioning schedule for R1. On 10/10/23, R1 was noted with an unstageable necrotic pressure injury to their sacrum. The facility did not individualize R1's care plan related to their pressure injury or discuss risks versus benefits related to repositioning with R1 or R1's representative. *R2 was assessed at risk for pressure injuries. The facility did not ensure R2's pressure relieving interventions were in place in accordance with R2's comprehensive care plan. Findings include: 1. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia, vascular dementia, and malnutrition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 1 resident was assessed to be clinically appropriate to self-administer medications.*R1 was observed with 6 medication pills in a medication cup on the over bed table next to R1 while R1 slept. R1 does not have a self-administration assessment completed identifying R1 was approved for self-administration of medications.Findings include:Policy . Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication.ProceduresMedication Administration . 4.Medications are to be administered at the time they are prepared.5. The person who prepares the dose for administration is the person who administers the dose.9. Verify medication is correct three times before administering the medication.10. Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection.This has the potential to affect the 35 residents currently residing in the facility. * R22 has Stage 4 sacrum pressure injury. There was no EBP (enhanced barrier precaution) sign on or around R22's door and there was no PPE (personal protective equipment) cart observed outside R22's room. Staff was observed not wearing the appropriate PPE during personal cares. * R28 is on EBP. Staff was observed entering R28's room without appropriate PPE. * The facility experienced a COVID 19 outbreak starting on 11/12/24 until 12/3/24. There is no information as to residents and/or staff tested during this outbreak and no documentation as to type of isolation residents were placed in. According to the outbreak summary health department was notified on 11/12/24. There is no information if the health department requested any information or provided the facility with an recommendations and if recommendations were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA-S) received the required 12 hours of training per year. This has the potential to affect the total census of 35 residents.Findings include:On 7/29/25, Surveyor requested from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, evidence that CNA-S had completed the required 12 hours of annual training. Surveyor noted CNA-S was hired on 1/5/23.On 7/30/25, at 2:11 PM, NHA-A provided annual training that was completed by CNA-S. Surveyor noted to NHA-A that CNA-S completed 7.08 hours of training and did not receive the 12 hours of annual training as required. Surveyor notified NHA-A of concerns with CNA-A not receiving the required 12 hours of annual training. NHA-A acknowledged these concerns and stated NHA-A would investigate further.On 7/31/25, at 1:47 PM, NHA-A notified Surveyor she was unable to find additional training for CNA-S and acknowledged CNA-S did not complete the 12 hours of annual training required. Surveyor requested additional information if available. No additional information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 8 (R2, R6, R3, R23, R4, R8, R22, and R28) of 9 residents were notified of the reason for transfer/discharge and bed hold policy in writing to the resident and their representative and the rate to reserve the resident bed was not documented in the facility’s transfer/ bed hold notice forms. * R2 was transferred to the hospital on 5/12/2025 and 7/23/2025, a transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R2 and/or R2’s representative. * R6 was transferred to the hospital on 2/13/2025, a transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R6 and/ or R6’s representative. * R3 was transferred to the hospital on 3/20/2025, 5/4/2025, and 5/14/2025, a transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R3 and/ or R3’s representative. * R23 was transferred to the hospital on 6/4/2025, a transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R23 and/ or R23’s representative. * R4 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure MDS (minimum data set) assessments were coded correctly for 4 (R22, R28, R5, & R3) of 13 reviewed for MDS accuracy. R22's significant change MDS with an assessment reference date of 6/23/25 was incorrectly coded for PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review), pressure injuries, and insulin. R28's quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of 6/13/25 was incorrectly coded for antibiotic. R5's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/20/25, did not accurately reflect that R5 has current tobacco use and antipsychotic medication. R3's quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of 7/2/25 was incorrectly coded for dialysis. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment and dated 4/28/25 under Policy documents The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that it did not employ individuals who were found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment by failing to conduct and maintain completed criminal background checks for 5 of 8 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) (CNA-S, CNA-T, CNA-U, LPN-V, and RN-W) facility staff reviewed.Findings include:On 7/30/25, Surveyor reviewed facility employee files to ensure completed background checks.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-S, with a hire date of 1/5/23, was noted to not have a Department of Justice (DOJ) background check completed until 11/21/23, a Background Information Disclosure (BID) check completed until 10/14/23 and an Integrated Background Information System Letter (IBIS) check completed until 11/21/23.CNA-T, with a hire date of 5/16/23, was noted to not have both a DOJ and IBIS background check completed until 4/18/24.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-V, with a hire date of 8/15/23, was noted to not have a BID background check completed until 8/1/24, DOJ and IBIS background check completed until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 2 (R22 & R2) of 2 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R22 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a right buttocks & sacrum pressure injury. The facility did not comprehensively assess R22's right buttocks pressure injury on admission as there are no percentages of the wound bed listed in R22's admission assessment. R22's right buttock pressure injury was incorrectly staged on 6/17/25, 6/19/25, 6/27/25, & 7/3/25. On 6/27/25, R22's sacrum pressure injury was incorrectly staged as Stage 4. The assessment documents a depth of 0.1 and the wound bed is 50% slough and 50% granulation. This assessment does not document any exposed bone, tendon, or muscle and there is no tunneling or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were labeled or properly stored for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility did not ensure expired medications were properly removed from facility stock and individually prescribed medications. * R2 had medication stored in a medication cart with no date listed as to when medication had been opened*During the medication storage task, six vials of expired magnesium supplements were discovered in the facility's medication room and 1 vial of opened expired magnesium supplement was discovered in a medication cart.Findings include:On 8/4/25 at 9:20 AM, Surveyor observed the Magnolia unit medication cart named with Surveyor observed R2's lubricant eye drop vial without an open date. On 8/4/25 at 9:25 AM, Surveyor showed Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist (LPN/IP)-E R2's lubricant eye drop vial and asked if they could see any opened date on the vial. LPN/IP-E responded that they could not see an opened date on R2's lubricant eye drop vial. The medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's hospice notes were readily available for communication and collaboration of care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R5) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services.Hospice visit notes were not updated in R5's medical record or in R5's hospice binder until Surveyor requested the information.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled, Hospice Services Facility Agreement, dated 7/15/2022 was reviewed. The policy documents: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines.:4. The written agreement(s) will set out at least the following.:d. A communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day.R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that include malignant neoplasm of rectum (a cancerous tumor in the rectum, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 2 (R4 & R2) of 5 Resident reviewed were offered the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization. R2 received the pneumococcal 23 on 5/18/12. R2's medical record does not have evidence R2 was offered and/or declined the pneumococcal vaccine 15, 20, or 21. R2's medical record does not have evidence R2 was offered and/or declined the influenza vaccine. R4's medical record does not have evidence R4 was offered and/or declined the Pneumococcal vaccine 15, 20, or 21. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) and last reviewed/revised 3/25/25 under policy documents It is our policy to offer residents and staff immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines and recommendations. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents 3. Prior to offering the pneumococcal immunization, each resident or the resident's representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to COVID-19 immunizations for 3 (R5, R4, and R2) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. * R5’s medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R5 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. * R4’s medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R4 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. *R2’s medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R2 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure dated as revised 9/17/2024 and titled, Covid-19 Vaccination documents: “Policy: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by educating and offering our residents and staff the COVID-19 vaccine… 8. COVID-19 vaccinations will be offered to residents when supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R5) of 7 residents reviewed were notified when there was a change in condition and a need to alter treatment. * R5's representative was not notified when R5 developed an open area below the left pinky toes on 11/5/24 and when R5 developed an area on the left outer ankle on 11/5/24. Findings Include: On 11/26/24, at 1:01 PM, Director of Nursing(DON) DON-B notified Surveyor there is no facility policy for notification. The facility's policy Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries implemented 8/2/21 and last revised on 7/20/22 documents: .Resident/Responsible Party Education 1. Provide Residents/responsible parties education regarding risk of pressure injuries based on the overall Resident risk. 2. Inform Residents/responsible parties on the presence of wounds. 3. Inform Residents/responsible parties on the status of wound progression. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] has diagnoses that include Dementia with Mood Disturbance, Adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, facility staff did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1(R5) of 4 residents reviewed. * R5's current physician orders, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) bedside [NAME], and comprehensive care plan document R5 is to wear size D double tubigrips to bilateral lower extremities (BLEs), worn toes to knees 23 hours/day as tolerated. Surveyor observed R5 to not be wearing the tubigrips during the survey process. On 11/14/24 an arterial open area was identified on R5's right 1st toe. R5's person-centered care plan was not updated with new interventions as well as R5 was not wearing physician ordered off-loading bilateral heel boots during the survey process. Findings Include: The facility's policy Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries implemented 8/2/21 and last revised on 7/20/22 documents: Policy: This center will complete a comprehensive assessment to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident (R) with hearing and vision impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices including arrangements for an audiology (ear doctor) for 1 (R5) of 1 residents reviewed for hearing and eyesight loss. * Surveyor observed R5 to not be wearing R5's glasses and bilateral hearing aides during the survey process. R5's Medication Administration Record(MAR) documented in August 2024, R5 had a referral for audiology consultation to evaluate need for or appropriate type of treatment relating to hearing deficits or medical problems. A consult was not completed. Findings Include: The facility's policy Use of Assistive Devices implemented 9/19/22 documents: .The purpose of this policy is to provide a process for the proper and consistent use of assistive devices for those Residents requiring equipment to maintain or improve function and/or dignity. 1. Assistive devices are tools, products, types of equipment, or technology that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medication administration records were complete and accurate for 2 (R1 and R3) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. * R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) had empty signature boxes for multiple medications from 9/2024 through 11/2024. The signature boxes indicate the medication was administered by a nursing professional assigned to R1. * R3's MAR had empty signature boxes for multiple medications from 9/2024 through 11/2024. The signature boxes indicate if the medication was administered by a nursing professional assigned to R3. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration General Guidelines dated 1/2024 document: Documentation: 1. The individual who administers the medication dose, records the administration on the resident's MAR immediately following the medication being given. In no case should the individual who administered the medications report off-duty without first recording…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Residents expressed concerns to surveyors that the facility does not have sufficient staff, resulting in delayed call light responses. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: The facility is composed of 3 units and had a census of 30 residents on 4/28/24. On 4/30/24 at 8:17 am, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B regarding the facility staffing levels and triggering for low weekend staffing on the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report for Fiscal Year 2023 (October 1 - December 31). Surveyor asked DON-B how the facility determines the amount of staffing needed to meet resident's needs. DON-B notified Surveyor that the facility determines the amount of staffing needed to meet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety potentially affecting all 30 residents residing in the facility. *During the initial tour Surveyor noted a jug of barbeque sauce sitting on the floor of the dry storage area, an open bag that had white powder in it that was unlabeled as to what it was, the freezer had an open bag of cheese omelets that was not dated, the lunch prep refrigerator had a container of several hot dogs sitting in liquid that was not dated or labeled, and a pitcher was not dated or labeled that was 1/3 full with brown liquid. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Food Storage: Dry Goods revised on 2/2023 states: All dry goods will be appropriately stored in accordance with the FDA Food Code. Procedures: 1. All items will be stored on shelves at least 6 inches above the floor. 5. All packaged and canned food items will be kept clean, dry, and properly sealed. 6. Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility did not ensure the garbage and refuse were properly disposed in the outside garbage storage receptacles. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse dated 8/2017 states: All garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe and efficient manner. Procedures: 1. The Dining Services Director coordinated with the Director of Maintenance to ensure that the are surrounding the exterior dumpster area is maintained in a manner free of rubbish or other debris. On 4/29/2024 at 9:59 AM Surveyor observed the garbage area with Dietary Manager (DM)-V. The area had a dumpster for garbage and a dumpster for recycling. Surveyor observed behind the dumpster there were about 20 wood pallets stacked along the back of the fencing, 1 refrigerator, and an accumulation of pine needles, pinecones, dirt, and garbage bags mixed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they provided consistent staff on weekends to meet the resident needs for the 30 residents residing in the facility. During review of the payroll-based-journal (PBJ) staffing data for the facility, the facility was triggered in the fiscal year quarter 1, 2023 (October-December) for low weekend staffing. Findings include: Review of the facility PBJ data, as part of the survey offsite process, indicates during the 1st quarter of the federal fiscal year 2023 (October 1 - December 31) the facility was triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. Surveyor reviewed the Facility assessment dated [DATE], which states the following: ~ Average daily census is 28 - 32 residents. ~ 5 Licensed Nurses providing direct care are needed ~ 8 Nurses Aides (CNA) are needed ~ 1 Registered Nurse (RN) or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) needed for each shift ~ 1 RN or LPN needed per 20 residents on days and PM shift. ~ 1 RN or LPN needed per 30 residents on night (NOC)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 6. On 4/28/2024 at 12:21 PM Surveyor was observing staff and residents in the dining room. Surveyor observed certified nursing assistant (CNA)-M assisting a resident to eat. Surveyor observed CNA-M turn towards another resident and assist them to eat. Surveyor noted that CNA-M did not wash CNA-M's hands in between assisting the residents to eat. Surveyor observed the same routine throughout the noon meal and CNA-M not washing CNA-M's hands between residents when assisting them to eat. On 4/30/2024 at 4:02 PM Surveyor shared concerns with director of nursing (DON)-B regarding Surveyors observation of CNA-M not washing hands in between assisting two residents to eat. DON-B stated CNA-M should have washed CNA-M's hands or asked another staff member to assist the other resident to eat. No further information was provided. 5. The facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 1/24 documents (in part) . .2. An adequate supply of disposable containers (such as souffle cups and calibrated medication cups) are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment which had the potential to affect all residents eating in the dining room and 2 (R282, R26) of 4 residents observed for cares. Surveyor observed residents being served meals placed in front of them on trays in the dining room. R282 had a strong urine odor in R282's bedroom and observations of yellow stains on the bed sheet on 4/29/2024 and 5/1/2024. Surveyor noted a urine odor and observed a yellow stain on the bed sheet for R26 when observing cares. Findings include: 1.) On 4/28/2024 at 12:08 PM Surveyors observed dining room staff bring out noon meal food that was set up on trays and started to place the trays in front of residents in the dining room. On 4/29/2024 at 8:23 AM Surveyors observed dining room staff bring out breakfast meal set up on trays and started to place the trays in front of resident in the dining room. On 5/1/2024 at 11:44 AM Surveyor shared concerns with director of nursing (DON)-B about residents being served their meals on trays in the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper code status documentation for 5 (R5, R10, R21, R23, and R26) of 5 residents reviewed for code status. R5's medical record indicated there was no form reviewed or signed by R5 indicating her code status wishes. R10's medical record indicated there was no form reviewed or signed by R10 indicating her code status wishes. R21's medical record indicated there was no Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form signed by R21 indicating their code status wishes. R23's medical record did not have a code status order or indication of R23's wishes for resuscitation. R26's medical record indicated there was no DNR form reviewed or signed by R26 indicating their code status wishes. Findings include: The facility policy titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) revised [DATE] documents (in part) . .It is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review the facility did not ensure recommendations made through the medication regime review were addressed for 5 (R19, R25, R2, R4, and R7) of 30 sampled residents. *R19 had pharmacy recommendations on 11/9/2023, 12/8/2023, and 2/26/2024 to add a dose in grams for R19's order for Diclofenac sodium external gel 1%. The pharmacy recommendations were never followed up on. *R25 had pharmacy recommendations that were not followed up on. *R2 had pharmacy recommendations that were not followed up on. *R4 had pharmacy recommendations to decreased ferrous sulfate and complete an AIMS assessment that were never followed up on. *R7 had pharmacy recommendations that were not followed up on. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Medication Monitoring: Medication Regimen Review and Reporting revised 1/2024 states: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure that self administration of medications was determined to be clinically appropriate for 2 (R7 & R25) of 2 Residents. * On 4/28/24 a bottle of artificial tears eye drops and Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray was observed on R7's over bed table. R7 does not have a self administration of medications assessment or physician order to self administer medications. * R25 does his own perineum wound treatment without being assessed as being capable of doing the treatment himself. R25 does not have a self administration assessment or physician order. Findings include: The Self-Administration by Resident policy and procedure dated 1/23 under policy documents Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so with a prescriber's order and if the nursing care center's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe and the medications are appropriate and safe for self-administration. Under Procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents whose Medicare part A benefits ended, was provided with written beneficiary protection notifications for 1 (R7) of 3 residents sampled for beneficiary notifications. The facility did not provide R7 a written Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), which includes financial liability information and appeal rights, at the time Medicare Part A coverage ended. Findings include: Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (Form CMS 10123-NOMNC) is utilized to provide written notification to resident or resident representative that Medicare Part A coverage is ending in two or more days. The notification includes appeal rights and provides the third party reviewer name and phone number to begin an immediate appeal. Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) (Form CMS-10055) is utilized to provide written notification to resident or resident representative of services Medicare A will no longer cover, an estimated cost of those services, and three options which include each choice's effect on appeal rights. On 4/30/2024 at 10:28 AM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the Facility did not notify residents and resident representatives of a transfer & the reasons for the transfer in writing to include the date, the location to which the resident is being transferred, a statement of the resident's appeal rights including the name, mailing and email address, and telephone number of the entity to which the appeal would be submitted, and information on how to obtain an appeal form, and the name, mailing and email address, and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 (R7, R21, and R5) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. * R7 was hospitalized on [DATE] and no written transfer notice was provided to R7 and R7's representative. * R21 was hospitalized on [DATE] and no written transfer notice was provided to R21 and R21's representative. * R5 was hospitalized on [DATE], 4/1/24, & 4/5/24 and no written transfer notices were provided to R5 and R5's representative. Findings include: The Transfer and Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the Facility did not notify residents and resident representatives of the duration of the bed-hold policy during which the resident was permitted to return to the facility and the reserve bed payment policy for 3 (R7, R21, and R5) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. * R7 was hospitalized on [DATE] and no bed hold notice was provided to R7 and R7's representative. * R21 was hospitalized on [DATE] and no bed hold notice was provided to R21 and R21's representative. * R5 was hospitalized on [DATE], 4/1/24, & 4/5/24 and no bed hold notices were provided to R5 and R5's representative. Findings include: The Transfer and Discharge (including AMA (against medical advise)) policy last reviewed/revised 7/15/22 under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines for Emergency Transfers/Discharges documents i. Provide a notice of the resident's bed hold policy to the resident and representative at the time of transfer, as possible, but no later than 24 hours of the transfer. 1.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R21) of 3 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) had an updated level 1 screen or a level II referral when R21 was diagnosed with psychotic disorder with delusions on 6/26/23. Findings include: The Facility does not have a PASARR policy. R21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses on admission were chronic kidney disease, stage 3, hypertensive heart, heart failure, gastroesophageal reflux disease, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, and hypothyroidism. R21's level 1 PASARR dated 6/23/22 checks no for mental illness and checks no for all questions on the Level one screen. Surveyor noted at this time a level 2 screen was not required for R21. The physician orders dated 3/27/23 documents Venlafaxine HCI oral tablet 37.5 mg (milligrams) (Venlafaxine HCI) Give 37.5 mg by mouth two times a day for depression, anxiety give with brk (breakfast) and after noon meal. On 6/23/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 of 1 (R10) residents reviewed for ADL's (Activity of Daily Living). R10 did not consistently receive showers. Findings include: R10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include: Aftercare following surgical amputation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertensive Heart Disease, chronic Congestive Heart Failure, dependence on renal dialysis, Cardiomyopathy, morbid obesity, lumbago with sciatica and spinal stenosis. The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) revised 7-26/22 documents (in part) . .The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for assessing non-pressure wounds for 3 (R25, R19, and R26) of 13 sampled residents. *R19 does not have a comprehensive care plan in place for diuretic use or lymphedema treatments and monitoring for adverse reactions. R19's care plan and care [NAME] were not revised to R19's current treatment, and no orders for R19's treatment or interventions could be located. *R25 has a neoplasm on R25's perineal area that was not being assessed by nursing staff. *R26 has a venous stasis ulcer, treatments were not completed according to orders, there was no comprehensive assessment, and Surveyor had observations of R26's wound not being cleaned during wound treatment. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries revised on 7/20/2022 states: The center will complete a comprehensive assessment to identify risk factors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents who enter the facility with an indwelling catheter is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary for 1 of 1 (R5) residents reviewed for catheters. R5 re-admitted to the facility following hospitalization with a Foley catheter. The facility did not follow up with urology or assess R5 for removal of the catheter. Findings include: R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with chronic Diabetic Neuropathy, Diabetic Retinopathy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Restless Leg Syndrome, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Spinal Stenosis lumbar region, Anemia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Major Depressive Disorder. Diagnosis of Hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction was added 3/20/24. The facility policy titled Catheter Care revised 3/15/23 documents (in part) . .It is the policy of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise; for 2 of 5 (R5 and R21) residents reviewed for weights. R5 sustained severe weight loss. Neither the Dietician nor Physician was notified and no new interventions were implemented. R21 was not weighed weekly per Physician's orders. Findings include: The facility policy titled Weight Monitoring revised 12/21/22 documents (in part) . .The interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor and intervene for undesirable weight change for our residents. 1. The nursing staff will measure resident weights upon admission, the next 2 days, and then weekly for 3 additional weeks thereafter. 2. If no weight concerns are noted after the initial 3 days and 3 weeks after, routine weights will be measured monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not comprehensively assess 1 (R2) of 1 Residents for trauma informed care and care plan approaches to mitigate any triggers to prevent re-traumatization. Findings include: The Trauma Informed Care Policy last reviewed/revised 10/18/22 under Policy documents It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines includes documentation of 2. The facility will use a multi-pronged approach to identify a resident's history of trauma. This will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event, as well as reviewing documentation such as the history and physical, consultation notes, or information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 3 (R2, R26 & R17) of 5 Residents reviewed. * R2 receives Metoprolol Succinate ER 75 mg once a day. R2's heart rate was not being taken according to physician orders prior to receiving the medication. * R26 received Keflex 500 mg (milligrams), an antibiotic, once daily for 7 days starting on 2/6/24 without adequate signs/symptoms of UTI (urinary tract infection). * R17 receives Metoprolol Succinate ER 25 mg one time a day. R17's heart rate was not being taken according to physician orders prior to receiving the medication. Findings include: 1.) R2's diagnosis includes hypertension. The physician order with an order date of 2/9/23 & start date of 2/10/23 documents Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) Tablet Extended Release 24 hour 25 mg (milligrams) Give 3 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure)< (less than) 100 and/or HR (heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 21.05%. R17's Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) was crushed. R6's Amlodipine Besylate was held with no parameters to hold the medication. R20 did not receive Farxiga, Isosorbide Mononitrate ER, Metoprolol Succinate ER, Prozac and Spiriva inhaler as ordered. R28 did not receive Bumetanide as ordered. Findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 1/24 documents (in part) . .Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. Medication Preparation: 3. Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 5. If it is safe to do so, medication tablets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biological's used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. Insulin pens were not labeled, not dated when opened and were expired. Findings include: The facility policy included and appendix of resources titled Medications with Shortened Expiration Dates dated 1/23 which documented (in part) . .Lantus Pen expires 28 days after first use. Levemir pen expires 42 days after first use. Aspart pen expires 28 days after first use. On [DATE] at 8:30 AM Surveyor observed the Deerpath medication cart. Surveyor observed the following insulin pens in the top drawer of the medication cart: Insulin Aspart pen belonging to R20 which was open and used, but not dated when opened. Levemir insulin flex pen which did not contain a label with a residents' name. Surveyor noted a torn white label printed with name/date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0811 — isolatedEnsure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure staff had successfully completed a State approved training course that meets the requirements before feeding residents for 1(R26) of 1 Residents. Life Enrichment Specialist-P was observed feeding breakfast to R26 on 4/29/24 & 4/30/24. Life Enrichment Specialist-P is not a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and did not complete the State approved training course prior to feeding R26. Findings include: R26's diagnoses includes chronic kidney disease stage 5, diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, and epilepsy. The at risk for nutritional/hydration status care plan initiated 10/26/22 & revised 4/9/24 documents the following interventions: * Administer medications as ordered. Initiated 10/26/22. * Administer vitamin/mineral supplements as ordered. Initiated 10/26/22. * Encourage and assist as needed to consume foods and/or supplements and fluids offered. Initiated 10/26/22. * Honor food preferences. Initiated 10/26/22. * Obtain labs as ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure the facility had a hospice policy and procedure to designate a member of the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) to be responsible for communicating with hospice for coordination of care that has the potential to affect 4 of 4 residents receiving hospice services. * R8 and R26 were reviewed for receiving hospice services. When Surveyors asked to review the facility policy and procedures for hospice services, the facility stated there was not a policy and procedure for hospice services. Findings include: 1.) R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and enrolled into hospice on 5/5/2023 with a diagnosis of severe protein calorie malnutrition. On 4/29/2024 at 3:05 PM Surveyor reviewed the facility survey binder and noted it did not include a hospice contract. Surveyor requested to see the hospice policy and procedure for the facility. On 5/1/2024 at 3:23 PM the director of nursing (DON)-B informed Surveyors that there was not a policy and procedure for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 3 (R5, R332, & R26) of 5 Resident reviewed were offered the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization. * R5's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R5 received or refused the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. * R332's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R332 received or refused the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. * R26's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R26 received or refused the pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: The Influenza Vaccination policy last reviewed/revised on 8/31/23 under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents: 1. It is the policy of this facility, in collaboration with the medical director, to have an immunization program against influenza disease in accordance with national standards of practice. 2. Influenza vaccinations will be routinely offered annually when it becomes available to the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they provided foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition for 1 out of 1 (R2) residents reviewed with a diagnosis of Diabetes. Findings include: Per the American Medical Directors Association - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Pressure Ulcers. Clinical Practice Guideline, dated 12/9/14, includes, in part: Treatment of foot problems in patients with diabetes is generally stratified into three broad risk categories: at-risk foot . has neuropathy .vascular insufficiency .cannot see, feel, or reach their feet .Treatment Plan . Refer for podiatrist care at least annually and as needed for specific foot problems .Train caregivers to perform daily foot care and inspection . Policy review: Diabetic Nail Care (no date) It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents receive proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1 (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] L) of 24 facility staff members were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Employee COVID-19 Vaccinations, dated 10/24/2022, specified, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all eligible employees are vaccinated against COVID-19 as per applicable Federal, State and local guidelines. The policy indicated, Individuals are considered fully vaccinated for COVID 14 days after receipt of the second dose of a two-dose primary vaccination series. 5. The facility will ensure that all eligible employees (except for staff who have been granted exemptions to the vaccination requirements, or those staff for whom COVID-19 must be temporarily delayed, as recommended by the CDC, due to clinical precautions and considerations) are fully vaccinated for COVID-19. The policy further indicated, 13. Vaccination documentation will be kept confidential and stored in the employee's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$214,308 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $94,680 — penalty dated 2025-08-04
- $31,103 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
- $55,419 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
- $29,961 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
- $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-01 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSHF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/24/2017 |
| MILLS, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/29/2017 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| BAUMANN, TROY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/29/2017 |
| HOEHN, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/29/2017 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| CONTINUUM THERAPY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| NSH REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WIPFLI LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| BELONGIA, CHRISTINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| GEE, DARREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/30/2021 |
| GREER, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/29/2023 |
| GROSENICK, KARI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| PATZER, COLLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/14/2023 |
| PURTELL, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2018 |
| MENOMONEE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| NSHF WISCONSIN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| RAMNANAN, KESHNI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $205K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525415. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.