Lee's Summit Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policies; failed to ensure prevention and treatment of pressure injuries (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction); failed to identify individuals at risk for developing pressure injuries; failed to assess, monitor, and measure the wounds at least weekly and document the findings; failed to observe for changes in the pressure injury that could indicate a change in the treatment; failed to implement the interventions on the residents plan of care; and failed to follow physician's orders for the treatment of pressure injuries for two sampled residents (Resident #26 and #307) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 9/1/21, showed: -It was the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 5/26/26, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place on 5/11/26. The resident's physician was notified of the error. The Director of Nursing (DON) provided facility staff training on 5/11/26 with return demonstration provided. The deficiency was corrected on 5/11/26. Review of facility policy entitled Medication Administration revised 2/7/24 showed:-Medications were administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. -Identified resident by photo in the Medication Administration Record (MAR).-Review MAR to have identified medication to be administered. -Compare medication with MAR to have verified resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. -Observed resident consumption of medication. 1.Review of Resident #2 admission Record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis:-Essential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered when a staff member administered Lorazepam Intensol (a scheduled IV controlled substance medication was used for the management of anxiety disorders (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) without a physician's order for one supplemental resident (Resident #14) out of 12 residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Medical Provider Orders, dated 4/7/22, showed: -The facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders. -Medications should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. -Documentation of medication if using electronic medication record, should be input in the electronic health record (EHR) with instructions per facility policy. -Medical provider orders should be reviewed prior to administration of medication to validate the orders timely. -If an order does not contain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident's ability and capacity for self-care of his/her catheter (a tube passed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine); failed to provide the resident with infection control education for self-administration of his/her catheter to help prevent infection; failed to capture the resident's self-catheter care on his/her admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-A federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning); and failed to include the resident's self-care on his/her baseline care plan for one sampled resident (Resident # 307), out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 48 residents. A policy was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #307's admission record, dated 3/25/25, showed he/she admitted with the following diagnoses: -Cognitive communication deficit. -Neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation on the narcotic count sheets; and failed to dispose of Lorazepam Intensol (a controlled substance used to treat anxiety) per professional standards and facility policy for one supplemental resident (Resident #14). The facility census was 48 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substance Administration & Accountability, dated [DATE], showed: -It was the policy of the facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. -The facility would have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure. -Where an automated patient profiling systems is not utilized, the Director of Nursing (DON), charge nurse, and other designee and the consultant pharmacist discuss all additions or deletions to the areas stock supply. -All controlled substances (schedule II, III, IV, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen and Dry Storage (DS) room floors clean; to maintain sanitary utensils and food preparation equipment; to safeguard against foreign material possibly getting into food; and to maintain plastic cutting boards in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination), in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 13 residents with a licensed capacity for 60 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Review of the meal times provided by the Dietary Manager (DM) on 9/5/23 at 8:48 A.M. showed that breakfast was served at 8:00 A.M., lunch at 12:00 P.M., and dinner at 5:30 P.M. Observation on 9/5/23 between 8:48 A.M. and 9:17 A.M. during the initial kitchen inspection showed the following: -There was a large amount of unknown residue on the manual can opener blade. -There were grease drips along the lower edge of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an annual dental exam for two sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #5) and to provide a dental consult for one sampled resident (Resident #12) who wanted to be evaluated for possible extractions of his/her teeth so he/she could obtain dentures out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility's dental services policy revised on 9/1/22 showed: -It was the policy of the facility to assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency dental care. -The dental needs were to be identified through the physical assessment and Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally required assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) assessment process and addressed in each resident's plan of care. -Oral/dental status should be documented according to assessment findings. -Residents and/or resident representative were notified of dental services available during the admission process. -The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during cares for one sampled resident (Resident #12); to ensure nursing staff were cleansing their hands during medication pass, did not sanitize a pair of scissors used to open an sealed package counting a narcotic, and picked a tray lid up off of the floor without cleansing hands for one sampled resident (Resident #10) out of nine sampled residents and to follow their policy to complete testing to screen new employees and residents for tuberculosis (TB- a communicable disease that affects especially the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) for two out of ten sampled new employees. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility's hand hygiene policy dated 9/1/21 showed: -All staff would perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents and visitors. -Hand hygiene should be conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' private records were kept private during a medication pass by not ensuring the computer screen was not visible to anyone walking by the computer on top of the medication cart while the nurse administered medications inside of the residents' room for two sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #11) and one supplemental resident (Resident # 10) out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration, dated 9/1/22 showed: -Medications were to have been administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. -Provide privacy. 1. Review of Resident 5's face sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Cognitive communication deficit (a disorder in which a person has difficulty communicating as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide continuity of resident care by not reviewing and revising resident comprehensive care plans (a document that specified health care and supported needs and outlined how the facility met resident requirements) for one sampled resident (Resident #269) out of nine sampled residents. This practice had the potential to effect the resident's safety and physical well-being. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans Policy, dated 9/1/2021, showed: -It was the facility's policy to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. -The comprehensive care plan described the services that were furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being. -The comprehensive care plan was prepared by the interdisciplinary team which included: --The attending physician. --A Registered Nurse (RN). --A nurse aide. --A member of the food and nutrition services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document information regarding the resident's personal belongings for one sampled closed record resident (Resident #15) out of two sampled closed records. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility's resident personal belongings policy revised 9/1/22 showed: -All resident personal belongings would be inventoried at the time of admission and documentation kept in the medical record. -Additional possessions brought in during the duration of the individual's stay would be added to the existing personal belongings inventory listing. -Following the discharge of a resident, all personal belongings would be given to the designated resident representative. -The inventory of personal belongings should be reviewed at time of discharge by Social Services and the resident's representative. -The recipient of the resident's personal belongings would sign-off with their legal signature acknowledging receipt of all personal belongings presented. 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $172K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO