No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Athene Nursing And Rehabilitation

13995 Clayton Road, Town and Country, MO 63017 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 282 certified beds · (636) 227-5070 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$122,846 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (108) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $122,846 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-12)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1176 Town Country Comms St · (636) 893-1260 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1060 Woods Mill Rd · (636) 227-2770 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1060 Woods Mill Rd · (636) 227-2278 · Call to confirm hours
Park
540 Maryville Centre Dr · (314) 819-1090 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
14088 Clayton Rd · (636) 227-5432

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.4%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.3%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.4%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%13.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.092.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.742.331.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

27.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

27.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
15.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 15.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF27.1%CMS range 19.5–42.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.4–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge15.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge15.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.4–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
61.2%
Total nursing turnover
94.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 282 beds and averages 159.6 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 122 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
30
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

108 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 94 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of five sampled residents was free from physical abuse (Resident #1). Resident #1 had diagnoses including dementia, restlessness, agitation, cognitive communication deficit, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. On 6/6/25 at approximately 5:00 P.M., certified medication technician (CMT) C told the resident he/she was nasty when the resident coughed or pretended to cough on CMT D's neck. CMT C began arguing with the resident, used profanity, and they threatened each other. CMT C pushed the resident and the resident pushed back. CMT C swung at the resident, hitting the resident around the face and neck, and the resident was pushed back against the wall. Staff intervened and pulled the resident away, causing him/her to fall to the ground. The CMT continued to try and strike the resident before staff pulled him/her away. The resident sustained visible injuries to his/her neck and hand. The facility census was 158. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to ensure the safety of one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) diagnosed with vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain) and encephalopathy (alteration in consciousness caused by diffuse/global brain dysfunction due to a chemical imbalance). On the morning of 1/9/24, the resident became agitated and physically aggressive towards staff. He/She forced his/her way off the locked unit on which he/she resided, was redirected back onto the unit by staff and then shattered a first-floor window in the secured unit and climbed through it. He/She was assessed and treated at the hospital. The resident returned to the facility and became agitated, tearing pictures from the walls in his/her room, sweeping belongings into the hallway and attempting to leave the secured unit. In response, the facility moved the resident to an third-floor unit. Staff, who were unaware of his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide acceptable nursing practice for one resident with bilateral (right and left) leg wounds (Resident #1). The resident routinely refused care and treatment from nursing staff, and he/she had physician orders for treatments to be performed daily by the resident with staff monitoring the treatments. Staff documented the treatments were completed, however during interviews, staff said they falsely documented completion and had not observed the resident perform his/her wound treatments as ordered. On 9/19/23, the resident called Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for assistance after a fall. EMS arrived, noted an overwhelming odor and had concerns of severe infection and necrosis (dead tissue) in the open wounds. The resident was transferred to the hospital, where it was determined he/she had sepsis (presence of bacteria and infectious organisms in the blood stream), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA, a bacteria that is responsible for many hard-to-treat infections) likely secondary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered prescription medications were received timely from the pharmacy and administered as ordered, affecting one resident who did not receive an antipsychotic medication for one month and had documented increased behaviors, including a resident-to-resident incident (Resident #173), and another resident who did not receive an antibiotic medication (Resident #133). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the Medication Reordering policy, revised 8/1/25, showed:-Policy: To accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutically services including the provision of routine and emergency medication and biologicals in a timely manner to meet the needs of reach resident;-Explanation and compliance guidelines:--The facility will utilize a systematic approach to provide or obtain routine and emergency medications in order to meet the needs of each resident;--Acquisition of medications should be completed in a timely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) was free from misappropriation of resident property when Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A used resident money for his/her personal use. The census was 155.The administrator was notified on 02/10/26 of the past noncompliance which occurred on 01/15/26. On 01/15/26, the administrator became aware of the staff to resident misappropriation of funds allegation involving Resident #1. Upon discovery, the facility immediately began an investigation, suspended the staff members, and in-serviced staff members on abuse, neglect, code of conduct, misappropriation, and exploitation. The deficiency was corrected on 01/17/26.1. Record review of Resident #1's personal bank statement for the month of 11/2025, showed the following withdrawals using Resident #1's debit card at River City Casino: Date Amount11/03/25 $1,009.0011/03/25 $709.0011/03/25 $209.00Total $1,927.00 Review of the Transactions Report by Card, dated 11/25/25, provided by the Town and Country (T & C)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner when staff observed a resident on the floor and failed to tell anyone, leaving the resident on the floor (Resident #183), and when staff left one resident without pants, leaving him/her exposed in the hallway (Resident #69). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the men and women's shower rooms on 3 Long Unit were in working order, preventing residents on that unit from using the shower room on their hall for an undetermined about of time, including one resident (Resident #147) who became aggressive due to his/her lack of access to showers. The sample was 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, dated, showed:-Right to a dignified existence: Be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity, recognizing each resident's individuality;-Freedom from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property;-Freedom from physical or chemical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0575 — pattern
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) Elder Abuse and Neglect Hotline phone number and failed to provide contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program (a statewide network of individuals who help residents in long-term care facilities by helping ensure their rights were preserved and respected) in a visible location. The sample was 47. The census was 166.Observation on 1/6/26 through 1/9/26, 1/12/26, and 1/13/26, showed: -No DHSS Abuse and Neglect hotline numbers or Ombudsman contact information on the facility's elevators;-The Corporate compliance contact information posted on the wall of Terrace 2. No DHSS Abuse and Neglect hotline number or Ombudsman contact information;-The Corporate compliance contact information posted on the double doors in the middle hall of Terrace 3. No DHSS Abuse and Neglect hotline number or Ombudsman contact information;-No DHSS Abuse and Neglect hotline number or Ombudsman contact information on 3 Short;-No DHSS Abuse and Neglect hotline number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays, a regular mail delivery day as identified by the United States Postal Service. The facility also failed to ensure mail was delivered timely. The sample was 47. The facility census was 166.During the resident council interview conducted with eight residents who represent the resident council, on 1/8/26 at 1:30 P.M., residents said mail is not delivered timely. It will sit in the activities room before they give it out. They have not had mail delivered this week. Some mail is time sensitive, that may have a due date or expiration date on it. One resident received his/her birthday card nearly one month late. He/She checked the postmark. He/She waited for the birthday card because there was $25 in there. He/She was upset it was delivered late. During an interview on 1/8/26 at 3:00 P.M., the Director of Activities said mail is delivered at the end of the day. After the facility receives the mail, the reception staff sort it out. He/She just got into the position, so he/she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directive/code status forms (a legal document, often a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, that tells medical professionals not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if the heart and breathing stop) were documented, updated, and reviewed annually, in accordance with the expectations of the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator, for 7 sampled residents (Residents #1, #6, #12, #17, #39, #55, and #176). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives policy, revised [DATE], showed:-Policy: To support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advanced directive;-Definitions: Advance directive is written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under state law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the state), relating to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was clean and homelike. The facility failed to ensure two of 47 sampled residents had a clean room and clean medical equipment (Residents #135 and #72), failed to ensure the 3rd floor terrace had a clean shower room and fire extinguisher cabinet, failed to ensure the 3rd floor windows were free from cracks, failed to ensure the floors in room [ROOM NUMBER] were clean and failed to ensure the loop main hallway was clean and free from odors. The sample is 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's cleaning policy, undated, showed: -Policy: The facility has employed team members of environmental service at the facility to ensure that all areas of the facility, including resident rooms, offices, and public areas, are clean and homelike; -Procedure: Walk through the assigned area checking for spills, debris, and unsafe items / situations to clean or remove immediately. The areas should be ready for residents, guests,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate activity of daily living (ADL, daily care) care to meet the needs of residents, including showers, personal hygiene, and nail care (Residents #15, #26, #143, #133, #153, #11, #21, #137, and #177). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Activity of Daily Living policy, revised 4/23/25, showed:-Policy: The facility will, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable;-Care and services will be provided for the following ADLs:--Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care;--Transfer and ambulation;--Toileting;-Explanation and compliance guidelines: -Conditions which may demonstrate unavoidable decline in ADLs include:--Natural progression of the resident's disease state with known functional decline;--Deterioration of the resident's physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident centered activities program that incorporated the resident's interests, hobbies and cultural preferences for two residents (Resident #153 and Resident #166) who resided on The Loop. In addition, the facility failed to provide one-to-one activities for one resident (Resident #177) who was unable to participate in group activities. The sample was 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's Activities policy, date last revised, 8/1/25, showed:-Policy: it is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preference of each resident. Facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as well as encourage both independence and interaction within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards by not obtaining dressing change orders for one resident that had a recent toe amputation (Resident #135) and by not changing one resident's leg wound dressing as scheduled and when it was saturated with fluid and dislodged (Resident #72). In addition, the facility failed to obtain a urinalysis (UA, a urine test to check for infection and obtain the results) as ordered for one resident (Resident # 3). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Wound Treatment Management policy, revised, 9/1/25, showed:-Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds. It is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders;-Policy explanation and compliance guidelines:-Wound treatments will be provide in accordance with physician order, including the cleansing method, type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 47 sampled residents received foot care and were on the podiatry list as needed (Residents #133, #72, #69 and #177). The census was 166. Review of the facility's activities of daily living (ADL) policy, dated 9/1/25, showed:-Policy: the facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable;-A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Review of Resident #133's, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/22/25, showed:-Cognitively intact;-The resident requires maximum assistance with bathing, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and putting on and taking off footwear.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 94 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with urinary catheters (tube that drains the urine from the bladder) had physician orders to include catheter care instructions, for two of three residents sampled with indwelling urinary catheters (Residents #182 and #10). The facility identified 12 residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, revised 8/1/25, showed:-It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use;-Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel;-Empty drainage bags when bag is half-full or every three to six hours;-Ensure drainage bag is located below the level of the bladder to discourage backflow of urine. 1. Review of Resident #10's electronic Physician's Orders Sheet (ePOS), dated November 2025, showed:-An order dated 11/22/25, to discontinue order for change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI - a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The sample was 47. The facility census was 166.Review of the facility's 2025 QAPI Plan, showed:-Establish a facility-wide process to identify opportunities of improvement through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety;-Address gaps in systems or processes;-Ensure adequate provision of staffing, time, equipment and technical training resources;-Establish clear expectations around safety, quality, rights, choice and respect;-Continually improve the quality of care and services provided to our residents;-The facility conducts performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow current infection control best practices and facility infection control policy for three of 47 sampled residents who were receiving antibiotic therapy. Concerns were noted with the indications for use in the antibiotic orders for all three residents (Residents #69, #166 and #26). The facility census was 166. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policy, revised 7/2/25, showed:-The Antibiotic Stewardship Program leaders utilize existing resources to support antibiotic stewards' efforts by working with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP utilizes expertise and data to inform strategies to improve antibiotic use to include tracking of antibiotic starts, monitoring adherence to evidence-based published criteria during the evaluation and management of treated infections, and reviewing antibiotic resistance patterns in the facility to understand which infections are caused by resistant organisms;-The program includes antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when facility staff left medication in one resident's room (Resident #135), who did not have a physician order for self-administration or medications to be left at the bedside. The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Resident Self Administration of Medications policy, last revised, 8/1/25, showed;-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication; a resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely;-Policy explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -When determining if self-administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should at a minimum consider the following: -The medications appropriate and safe for self-administration; -The resident's physical capacity to swallow without difficulty, open medication bottles, administer injections; -The resident's cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were provided for two of four residents investigated for discharge (Residents #166 and #177). The sample was 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer policy, dated 8/1/25, showed:-Policy: at the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and addresses information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed;-The facility will keep a signed and dated copy of the bed-hold notice information given to the resident and/or resident representative in the resident's file. 1. Review of Resident #166's medical record, showed: -Discharge to the hospital on [DATE];-No filled out and signed bed hold notice provided by the facility for the date of 10/16/25. 2. Review of Resident #177's, medical record, showed:-Discharge to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans included revisions to address individual care needs for two of 47 sampled residents, when the facility included incorrect information about diet orders and code status on resident care plans (Residents #12 and #143). The facility census was 166.Review of the facility's Care Planning - Resident Participation Policy, revised 8/1/25, showed:-The care planning process should include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care;-The facility will encourage and assist the resident and/or representative to participate in choosing care and treatment options including: initial decisions about treatment, decisions about changes in treatment, and the right to refuse treatment;-If participation of the resident or resident's representative is determined not practicable for the development of a resident's care plan, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards when staff failed to obtain weights as ordered for two residents (Residents #175 and #177). The facility also failed to ensure physician's orders for hemodialysis (a life sustaining treatment for kidney failure that removes waste and extra fluids from the blood) assessments were obtained for one resident out of three residents sampled for hemodialysis (Resident #5). The sample was 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's Weight Monitoring policy, revised 9/1/25, showed:-Policy: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise;-Compliance guidelines: Weights should be recorded at the time obtained. Newly admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff attempted to communicate with a resident, who was non-English dominate speaking resident, in in a form and manner that the resident can understand. The facility did not provide an activity calendar in his/her dominate language, a communication board, or use a translation application to communicate with the resident (Resident #176). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Culturally Competent Care policy, revised 4/23/25, showed:-Policy: to provide culturally competent care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility has established a culture that treats each resident with respect and dignity as an individual, as well as addresses, supports and/or enhances his/her feelings of self-worth including personal control over choices and cultural preference;-Effective communication: describes a process of dialogue between individuals. The skills include speaking to others in a way they can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety and adequate monitoring were provided during meals for two residents who had recommendations from Speech Therapy regarding proper positioning, type of required assistance during meals and/or monitoring during meals (Resident #109 and #11). The resident sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, revised 4/23/25, showed:-The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable.-Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: Eating to include meals and snacks;-Terminology for ADL evaluation and documentation will follow definitions from the State's Resident Assessment Instrument Manual: Partial/moderate assistance: if the helper does LESS THAN HALF the effort. Helper lifts, holds, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident that had a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube that is surgically inserted into the abdomen to administer fluids, liquid nutrition, and medications) received the correct water flush during medication administration (Resident # 178). The sample was 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's policy for Medication Administration via Enteral tube (feeding tube), date last revised 5/1/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of medications via enteral feeding tubes by utilizing best practice guidelines;-Procedure: Verify physician orders for medication and enteral tube flush amount; Flush enteral tube with at least 15 milters (ml) of water prior to administering medications unless otherwise ordered by prescriber; Dilute the solid or liquid medication as appropriate and administer using a clean oral syringe greater than 30 ml in size; Flush the tube again with at least 5 ml of water takin into account resident's volume status; Repeat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for one resident's' behavior (Resident #177). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Behavior Management policy, last revised, 8/1/25, showed:-Policy: Residents who exhibit behavioral concerns may require a behavioral management care plan to ensure they are receiving appropriate service sand interventions to meet their needs; The interdisciplinary team, including the family member, should develop a behavioral plan for each resident with identified behaviors; The plan should reflect the resident' personal preferences and usual routine, to the extent possible; the plan should include the recreation schedule, non-pharmacological interventions, and environment adjustments needed to help the resident meet his or her highest practicable well-being;-Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: -Upon admission of a new resident, the Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a narcotic medication was under a double lock and counted when a resident admitted and destroyed when the resident discharged from the facility (Resident #179). The sample was 47. The census was 166. Review of the facility's medication administration policy, dated 2/7/24, showed: -Policy: medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Review of Resident #179's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/27/25, showed: -Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, and dementia; -Moderately impaired cognition. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -A note, dated 12/18/25, resident discharged with all personal belongings, escorted to long term care facility in personal vehicle by his/her son. Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that residents receive meals with appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences by failing to assure one resident received an appropriate substitute for starches (Resident #5). The sample was 47. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Assisted Nutrition and Hydration policy, revised 8/1/25, showed:-The facility will: Provide nutritional and hydration care and services to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment;-Recognize, evaluate, and address the needs of every resident, including but not limited to, the resident at risk or already experiencing impaired nutrition and hydration;-Provide a therapeutic diet taking into account the resident's clinical condition and preferences;-Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure each resident: Maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional and status, such as usual body weight or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines and the facility's infection control policies for two of 47 sampled residents. Staff failed to use an adequate disinfectant on reusable medical equipment during a resident's dressing change (Resident #9). Staff failed to use adequate Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, precautions requiring the use of additional protective equipment by staff when providing care to reduce the spread of certain infections) interventions when providing direct care to a resident with a catheter (thin flexible tube) (Resident #135). The facility census was 166. Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised 4/23/25, showed: -The policy is designed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs); -An order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions will be placed for residents with any of the following conditions: wounds, wounds such as chronic pressure ulcers, diabetic foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) received personal hygiene assistance in accordance with their personal needs by not providing baths/showers for two residents (Residents #13 and #12). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff had enough towels and linen to assist residents timely with personal care as needed when staff and residents reported a towel and linen shortage. The resident sample was 16. The census was 166.1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 9/1/24, showed:-The facility will ensure that all staff members are educated on the rights of residents and the responsibility of the facility to properly care for its residents;-The resident has the right to a dignified existence;-The resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control when staff failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing) as recommended by the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) and required by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for two out of two residents observed for wound care (Resident #2 and Resident #1) and when one resident's catheter drainage bag (a medical device that collects urine from a urinary catheter) lay on the floor (Resident #2). In addition, staff failed to cover food when transporting a cart of plated food onto the elevator. The sample was 16. The Census was 166.Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met acceptable professional standards of care when staff failed to accurately document one resident's tube feedings (nutrition provided through a gastric tube (g-tube) a tube that is surgically inserted into the stomach) for one resident (Resident #8). In addition, staff failed to obtain and document a resident's blood pressure prior to the administration of Hydrochlorothiazide (used to treat high blood pressure) (Resident #14). The sample was 16. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Documentation in the Medical Record Policy, dated 8/1/25, showed:-Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team (IDT) members shall document all assessments, pertinent observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy;-Documentation shall be completed at the time of service, but no later than the shift in which the assessment, observation, or care service occurred.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to transcribe new treatment orders timely and failed to accurately document treatments for three sampled residents (Resident #7, #3, and #8). Staff failed to obtain a physician order for a wound vacuum (wound vac, medical device that used suction to promote wound healing) for one resident (Resident #7). Staff failed to identify a deep tissue injury (DTI, persistent non-blanchable deep red, purple or maroon areas of intact skin, non-intact skin or blood-filled blisters caused by damage to the underlying soft tissues), upon admission for one resident (Resident #3). The sample was 16. The census was 166. Review of the facility's Wound Treatment Management Policy, dated 5/1/25, showed:-Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's nutritional status and effectiveness of interventions when staff failed to obtain admission weights and weekly weights as ordered for one resident with a diagnosis of severe protein calorie malnutrition upon admission (Resident #14). The sample was 16. The census was 166.Review of the facility's Weight Monitoring policy, dated 9/1/25, showed:-Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise;-Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss over a period time) may indicate a nutritional problem;-The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize a resident's nutritional status. This process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care services for one resident (Resident #14). The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of vascular dementia (type of dementia caused by damage to the blood vessels in the brain) with behavioral disturbances. The facility failed to administer the resident's psychotropic medications as ordered and accurately document the administration of the medication or refusal. In addition, the facility failed to code the resident's behaviors accurately by documenting no behaviors even though there were reports of behaviors such as refusals, hitting, and attempting to walk without assistance. The sample was 16. The census is 166.Review of the facility's Behavior Management policy, revised 8/1/25, showed:-Residents who exhibit behavioral concerns may require a behavior management care plan to ensure they are receiving appropriate services and interventions to meet their needs. The interdisciplinary team, including the family members, should develop a behavioral plan for each resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess a resident after a fall with a head injury. Staff failed to document neurological (neuro) checks after the head injury. The resident was sent to the hospital via 911 and diagnosed with a subdural hematoma (pool of blood between the brain and the outermost covering) twelve days after the fall (Resident #1). The sample size was three. The census was 152. The Administrator was notified on 7/31/25 of the past non-compliance. The facility had already started in-servicing staff on falls, interventions and documenting prior to the investigation. The facility was in compliance on 7/1/25. Review of the facility's Head Injury policy, dated 9/1/21, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to report potential head injuries to the physician and implement interventions to prevent further injury;-Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: --Assess resident following a known, suspected or verbalized head injury. The assessment shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an altercation between Resident #1 and several staff members which resulted in the resident sustaining scratches on both sides of his/her neck and on his/her left hand. A registered nurse asked for written statements from the staff members involved and then read each others statements in front of each other. The next day, Certified Nurse Aide F reported to the Director of Nursing his/her statement was not correct and provided a new statement of events alleging CMT C had assaulted the resident. The DON did not investigate the incident further, including interviewing the resident and other staff members privately regarding the incident or advise the Administrator of the revised statement. This deficient practice affected one out of five sampled residents. The census was 158. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy revised 8/22/22, showed: -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary medications as ordered by the physician for one of seven sampled residents (Resident #5). The facility failed to provide twice daily anti-seizure medication to the resident nine out of ten times over a five-day period. Facility staff also failed to notify nursing management and the physician of the medication errors. The facility census was 158. 1. Review of the Facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised 9/1/22, showed: -Medication carts should be stocked with adequate supplies of medications; -If expired medications are noted and cannot be administered, the nurse manager should be notified; -Any adverse side effects or refusals of medications should be documented and reported; -Discrepancies with orders or supplies of medication should be corrected and reported to the nurse manager. Review of the Facility's e-kit (Emergency Kit, a standard stock of commonly prescribed life-saving medications to be used in an emergency situation) Inventory on 6/12/25, showed: -A minimum of four tablets of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure one resident's medication dose for Depakote (divalproex sodium, medication used to treat seizures and mood disorders) was entered correctly from the hospital after admission to the facility (Resident #3). This failure resulted in the resident receiving a lower dose of the medication for six days. The facility also failed to follow manufacturer and pharmacy recommendations and crushed a medication prior to administration for two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #1). One of the residents was hospitalized and found to have a low therapeutic level of the medication (Resident #1). The sample was 6. The census was 158. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised 9/1/22, included: -Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when one employee used profanity while using their personal cell phone and providing feeding assistance to one resident (Resident #1), and four residents reported issues with staff being on their phones while working (Residents #2, #3, #5 and #4). The census was 143. Review of the facility's Professionalism - Customer Service policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide professional, courteous service to our customers. Every employee is accountable for conducting themselves in a professional manner at all times. This facility strives to create an environment where the resident always comes first; -The facility is the resident's home and will be regarded as such. Each resident will be treated with compassion and respect at all times. Review of the facility's Personal Cell Phones policy, undated, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and ensure meal service tray temperatures were maintained to at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Three of six residents complained that hot foods were served cold (Residents #13, #15 and #16). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate their meals in their room. The census was 143. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:27 A.M., Resident #13 said he/she eats in his/her room. The food is usually cold by the time he/she gets it. Staff will heat it up in the microwave if you ask. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 11:19 A.M., Resident #15 and Resident #16 both said the food is improving. As far as food being warm when it is served, sometimes it's warm enough and sometimes it's not. Observation on 1/13/25 at 12:30 P.M., showed dietary staff brought the tray cart (a warming cart that can be plugged in to keep the trays warm until ready to serve) and left it in the hall. The plates contained roasted chicken, a scoop of mashed potatoes and a scoop of spinach.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to date opened packages of food. The facility also failed to ensure dining room furniture was clean and free of roaches and failed to keep kitchen equipment clean when staff failed to clean the wells of a steam table used to serve resident's food. The sample size was 25. The census was 143. Review of the facility's Food Safety Requirements, dated 9/1/21, showed: Policy: Food will be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; Definitions: -Food service: the process involved in actively serving food to the resident; -Food service safety: refers to handling, preparing, and storing food in ways that prevent foodborne illness; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prepared food items were served at a safe and appetizing temperature when the staff failed to maintain the internal temperatures of hot food items placed in hot holding at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens and potential food-borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate food from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 138. Review of the facility's Food Temperatures Policy, dated 9/1/21, copyright 2021, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperature(s) before trays are assembled; Definitions: -Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF) or Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) Food means food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens such as bacterial or viral organisms capable of causing disease; Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -Food temperatures will be checked on all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors, when staff failed to administer one resident's diabetes medications for several days (Resident #2). The sample was 5. The census was 131. The Administrator was notified on 8/2/24, of the past non-compliance which began on 7/21/24. The facility began an investigation, audited resident medications, reviewed all new admissions orders, interviewed staff and residents, had a meeting with the pharmacy, and in-serviced staff on following physician orders, the protocols when a medication is not available, and verifying medications for new admissions. The deficiency was corrected on 7/31/24. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Order Policy, revised 4/7/22, showed: -This facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -Medications and/or Treatments should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. -Verbal orders should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of six sampled residents were free from physical abuse. The residents' right to be free from physical abuse were violated when during two separate incidents a resident (Resident #2) hit four residents (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #3 and #4) in the face and stomach. The census was 92. On 7/1/24 at 5:00 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance, which occurred on 6/28/24. On 6/28/24, the Administrator was notified by staff of the incident and an investigation was started. The facility immediately took steps to protect the residents and set interventions in place to prevent further abuse. The alleged violation was reported within the required timeframe. Facility staff received education on the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy. Resident #2 was discharged to the hospital and is not expected to return. Appropriate corrective actions were taken. The deficiency was corrected on 6/30/24. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pre-admission screenings were completed timely and failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) Level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report for one of six sampled resident's (Resident #1's) plan of care. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program policy, revised on 9/1/21, showed: -This facility coordinates assessments with the PASARR program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs; -All applicants to the facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening; a. PASARR Level 1- initial pre-screening that is completed prior to admission; -Positive Level I Screen - necessitates a PASARR Level II evaluation prior to admission; b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services for a resident's psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's behaviors, which included verbal aggression, for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of six sampled residents. The facility failed to inform staff how to handle the resident's escalating behaviors. The facility census was 92 residents. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy revised on 9/1/21, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment: -Person centered care means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives; -The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from financial misappropriation resulting in the resident's credit card being taken by two staff members. The census was 134. The Administrator was notified on 6/4/24 of the past non-compliance, which began on 5/31/24. The facility immediately began an investigation of the incident and removed the staff members who misappropriated the resident's funds pending an investigation. The administrator began in-servicing staff on abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The noncompliance was corrected on 6/3/24. Review of the facility's abuse, neglect and exploitation policy, dated 8/22/22, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Definitions: Misappropriation of resident property means the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated properly according to professional standards for food prepared from the facility's kitchen. This failure had the potential to affect 126 of 127 residents consuming food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage Sanitation and Food Safety, dated August 2024, revealed that all food stock and products were stored in approved sanitary storage containers, and all contents were covered, with contents labeled and dated. During an observation, alongside the Assistant Administrator, on 02/12/24 at 9:32 AM, the refrigerator contained food items not labeled or dated. The refrigerator had large containers of cooked and uncooked chicken quarters, cooked chicken patties, a large container of cooked hot dogs, multiple packages of opened lunch meat, multiple packages of opened sliced cheese and shredded cheese, an opened container of sour cream, an opened container of apple sauce, and a large pan of Jello/fruit dessert that was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was developed to drive quality assurance (QA) measures which addressed resident care and safety, quality of life, and resident choice. This failure had the potential to affect all 127 residents who currently lived in the facility. (Cross Reference F868) Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 09/01/21, indicated .It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcome of care and quality of life. The QAPI plan will address the following elements.Design and scope of the facility's QAPI program and QAA Committee responsibilities and actions.Policies and procedures for feedback, data collection systems, and monitoring.Process addressing how the committee will conduct activities necessary to identify and correct quality deficiencies. Key components…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee met at least quarterly. This had the potential to affect the care and services for each of the 127 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 09/01/21, indicated .The QAA Committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall.Consist at a minimum of.The Director of Nursing Services.The Medical Director or his/her designee.Meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI program. During an interview on 02/15/24 at 1:28 PM the Administrator stated he had no evidence to present to indicate the attendees conducted prior quarterly QAPI meetings. During this interview he presented the following documents: A document titled QAPI Meeting Agenda and Minutes, dated 11/08/23, indicated the following mandatory staff members were in attendance: The Administrator, Assistant Director of Nursing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) for recording incidents of infections identified under the facility's IPCP, surveillance, tracking and trending, and the corrective actions taken by the facility for 127 of 127 census residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 performed hand hygiene after doffing (removing) gloves and failed to ensure a serving of applesauce was replaced, after being contaminated, for one of one resident (Resident (R) 83) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a document titled, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) .National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) .Long Term Care Facility Component Tracking Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities ., located at https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/ltc/ltcf-manual-508.pdf, dated 01/20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their system to monitor the use of antibiotics for 127 of 127 census residents. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor and evaluate antibiotic use and track measures of antibiotic usage in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program [IPCP], revised 09/01/22, revealed .Antibiotic Stewardship: a. An antibiotic stewardship program will be implemented as part of the overall infection prevention and control program. b. Antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use will be implemented as part of the antibiotic stewardship program . During an interview on 02/14/24 at 3:55 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated she started her position as IP near the beginning of November 2023 and confirmed she completed the certification process on 10/26/23. The IP was asked to provide the facility's documentation of the antibiotic stewardship program from 01/01/23 through 02/01/24. The IP provided documentation dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure grievances shared at the monthly meetings by seven of the members of resident council who regularly attend (Residents (R) 7, R17, R29, R70, R92, R101, and R104) were resolved or a rational provided. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, dated 09/01/21, revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice a grievance without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Community Administrator has been designated as the Grievance Official. g. In accordance with the resident's right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the Grievance Official will issue a written a written decision on the grievance to the resident or representative at the conclusion of the investigation. 12. The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. Review of the monthly Resident Council minutes provided by the facility, dated August 2023 through January 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, resident council minutes review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to review resident rights with seven of the members of resident council who regularly attend (Residents (R) 7, R17, R29, R70, R92, R101, and R104) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 09/01/21, revealed Policy: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language the resident understands of his or her rights and all rules and regulations goyering [sic] resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Council Meetings, dated 09/01/21, revealed .The policy provides guidance to promoting structure, order, and productivity in these meetings .Example of meeting topics Resident rights . Review of the monthly Resident Council minutes provided by the facility, dated August 2023 through January 2024, revealed reoccurring grievances every month with call lights not being answered timely by nursing staff, food being cold from dietary,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to the residents who resided in the secured unit when the Activity Assistant was not assigned to work. In addition, the facility failed to provide individual activities to three out of seven residents (Resident (R) 130, R23 and R25) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility's policy titled, Activities, dated 09/01/21, indicated .It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences of each resident. Facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as well as, encourage both independence and interaction within the community . 1. Review of R130's electronic medical record (EMR) titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that electrical equipment with exposed cord was not used in a dementia secured unit with the potential to cause accident hazards, such as tripping and/or falling of 26 residents who ambulated and wandered within the unit. Findings include: Review of a facility's policy provided by the facility titled Resident Environment Quality, dated 09/01/21, indicated .It is the policy of this facility to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents and the public . During an observation on 02/12/24 at 10:39 AM, an exposed (approximately eight feet) extension cord went through the center of a room. The room was open except for an L shaped floor to ceiling column. The column was open to an adjacent room between open areas and had a television in front. The extension cord was medical grade, and the television cord was plugged into the device. The cord had bright orange tape covering it, but the center of the tape was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a locked storage area when left unattended for one of five medication rooms in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, last revised 09/01/21, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) .Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments. During an observation on 02/12/24 at 11:10 AM, the Emergency Medication Room was observed to be unlocked on the third floor near the dining room. Inside was noted to have a secured Nexsys system [automated medication dispensing cabinet],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R) 109, R24, and R39), out of 31 residents on the secured unit, were provided a timely scheduled lunch meal. As a result, three residents complained of being hungry and were not aware of an unplanned change in the schedule for meal delivery. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Accommodation of Needs, indicated .The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and will evaluate and make reasonable accommodations for the individual needs and preferences or a resident, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered . 1. Review of R109's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia. Review of R109's EMR titled annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to ensuring housekeeping and maintenance services were conducted as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This had the potential to affect 127 of 127 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, last revised 09/01/21, revealed In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extend possible .Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment .Minimize odors by disposing of soiled linens promptly and reporting lingering odors and bathrooms needing cleaning to Housekeeping Department .Report any unresolved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to respect two of 29 sampled residents' (Resident (R) 23 and R104) right to be treated with respect and dignity. R23 was brought to the common area and dining area of his unit without trousers on, and R104's urinary catheter drainage bag was left uncovered. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, revised 09/01/21, revealed .It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality .Groom and dress residents according to resident preference .Maintain resident privacy . 1. Review of R23's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a significant weight loss for one of four residents (Resident (R) 98) reviewed for nutrition of 29 sampled residents. (Cross Reference F641, F657, R692, F726, and F777) Findings include: Review of a facility's policy titled, Notification of Changes, 09/01/21, indicated .The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Review of R98's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of R98's EMR titled admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/23/24 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a Broda chair (a positioning wheelchair) as a restraint and failed to obtain a physician's order, provide a medical symptom, and obtain consent for the use of a restraint for one of one resident (Resident (R) 23) reviewed for restraints of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, revised 09/01/21, revealed .It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable wellbeing in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraints .'Physical Restraint' refers to any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 23) reviewed for chemical restraints did not receive a chemical restraint as a convenience to treat behaviors. R23 was prescribed Haldol and Seroquel, both antipsychotic medications, for behaviors and without a medical symptom for their use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, revised 09/01/21, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable wellbeing in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraints .'Chemical Restraint' refers to any medication that is used for discipline or staff convenience, and not required to treat medical symptoms . 'Convenience' refers to any action taken by the facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 94) and/or responsible party (RP) were given a written bed hold policy at the time the resident was transferred/discharged to the hospital of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility's policy provided by the facility titled, Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer, dated 09/01/21, indicated .At the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and addresses information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed.Before a resident is transferred to the hospital or goes on therapeutic leave, the facility shall provide to the resident and/or the resident representative information on the bed hold policy . Review of R94's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R) 98, R94, and R23) out of 29 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to code the MDS correctly could potentially lead to inaccurate assessment and care planning of the resident. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual, dated 10/01/19, indicated .It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) completing the assessment .page 237 showed: Coding Instructions .F0300: Should Interview for Daily and Activity Preferences Be Conducted .Coding Instructions .Code 0, no .This option should be selected for residents who are rarely/never understood . 1. Review of R98's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) as required for two of four sampled residents (Resident (R) 118 and R6) reviewed for PASARRs. R118 was admitted on [DATE] with a 30-day PASARR exception but was still a resident on 02/12/24. The facility did not perform a Level I PASARR screening after 30 days or refer for a Level II PASARR, if necessary, within 40 days of the resident's admission. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, revised December 2022, revealed .Exceptions to the preadmission screening program include those individuals who .Are admitted directly from a hospital, require nursing facility services for the condition for which the individual received care in the hospital, and has been certified by the attending physician before admission that the individual is likely to require less than 30 days of nursing facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive plan of care with measurable goals and plans for three of 29 sampled residents (Resident (R) 130, R68, and R77) reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2019, indicated .Care Area Assessment (CAA) Process. This process is designed to assist the assessor to systematically interpret the information recorded on the MDS .The CAA process helps the clinician to focus on key issues identified during the assessment process so that decisions as to whether and how to intervene can be explored with the resident .Specific components of the CAA process include: - Care Area Triggers (CATs) are specific resident responses for one or a combination of MDS elements. The triggers identify residents who have or are at risk for developing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident) (R) 98) and/or their representative was invited to participate in the resident's quarterly care plan meeting and the facility failed to update the activity care plan for one of seven residents (R23) reviewed for activities of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 09/01/21, revealed, .The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment . The policy failed to contain information that the resident and/or the resident representative was to be invited on a quarterly basis. 1. Review of R98's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of R98's EMR titled admission Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care; assistance with eating, drinking, and dressing; complete transfers in a safe manner; and/or provide showers as scheduled for two of four residents (Resident (R) 23 and R186) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) of 29 sampled residents. R23 and R186 were dependent on staff for meeting their ADL needs. R23 was not provided incontinent care or offered and/or encouraged to have fluids during a three-hour observation, was not assisted with dining during one observation, and was not transferred in a safe manner. R186 was not assisted with showers twice weekly as care planned. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, dated 2021, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for two of 29 sampled residents (Resident (R)186, and R88). This failed deficiency had the potential to allow residents to go without needs being met or care being provided when physician's orders were not in place. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated 09/01/21, indicated It is the policy of this facility to perform blood glucose monitoring to diabetic residents as per physician's orders .The facility will perform blood glucose monitoring as per physician's orders .Report critical test results to physician timely. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hypoglycemia Management, last revised 10/03/23, indicated It is the policy of this facility to ensure effective management of a resident who experiences a hypoglycemic episode .The facility will identify residents that are at risk for hypoglycemia and observe them for signs and symptoms of low blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to create a care plan, with specific approaches, which addressed one of four residents (Resident (R) 98)'s diagnosis of malnutrition upon admission. The facility failed to ensure a dietary intervention was properly implemented as directed by the resident's care plan that addressed potential weight loss. The facility failed to ensure the physician provided a clinical rationale for the resident's significant weight loss. This had the potential to increase the resident's opportunity for unintended weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Management, dated 09/01/22, indicated .Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator was cleaned, had a filter on the inlet where the air came into the machine, and ensured an E cylinder was secured for one of one resident (Resident (R) 77) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to allow for an increased chance of infection and the improper storage of the cylinder causing severe injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident- Care Equipment, dated 09/01/21, revealed Policy: Resident-care equipment can be a source of indirect transmission of pathogens. Reusable resident-care equipment will be cleaned and disinfected in accordance with current CDC [Centers for Disease Control] recommendations in order to break the chain of infection . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, dated 09/01/21, revealed Policy: The purpose of this policy is to establish responsibilities for the care and use of oxygen concentrators.5. Care of the Concentrator:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, document review, interviews, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 was competently trained to read the results of a radiology report for one of one resident (Resident (R) 98) of 29 sampled residents. (Cross Reference F777). Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Facility Assessment Tool, dated 12/06/23, indicated .Staff training, education is conducted by in-services, 1 on l training, and education packets with posttests . Review of LPN3's employee file indicated the staff member was hired on 12/14/23. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Position Description for an LPN, dated 11/20/16, indicated .Works under direct supervision in accordance with the state-specific Nurse Practice Act, facility Policies and Procedures, and nursing judgment .Delivers nursing care to patients/residents requiring long-term or rehabilitative care .Collects patient/resident data, makes observations, and reports pertinent information related to the care of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities were identified and reported by the Consultant Pharmacist for one of six residents (Resident (R) 23) reviewed for medication regimens of 29 sampled residents. R23 was prescribed Haldol and Seroquel, both antipsychotic medications with Black Box Warnings, without adequate indication for use. (Cross Reference F605) Findings include: Review of R23's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain, epilepsy, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of R23's Medication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Records (TARs), dated October 2023 and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed no documentation R23 had displayed any behaviors, agitation, or physical aggression towards others. Review of R23's Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, manufacturer guideline review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident (R) 130) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 29 sampled residents had appropriate indications for use for an antipsychotic (Thorazine), failed to have proper black box warnings, and failed to ensure behaviors and side effects were monitored associated with this medication. Findings include: Review of a facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Drugs, dated 09/01/21, indicated .Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s) . Review of the National Institute of Health at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the radiology report was read correctly for one of one resident (Resident (R) 98), by one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 and as a result there was a delay in care after the resident sustained an acute fracture of the proximal humerus. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated 09/01/21, indicated .The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistance, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law.Promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside the clinical reference range. Review of R98's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R98's EMR titled admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide influenza vaccines for two of five residents (Resident (R) 23 and R118) reviewed for immunizations of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 09/01/22, revealed .Influenza .Immunization: a. Residents will be offered the influenza vaccine each year between October 1 and March 31 unless contraindicated or received the vaccine elsewhere during that time . 1. Review of R23's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain, epilepsy, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of R23's Physician Orders, dated 06/26/21 and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed a physician's order for R23 to have the influenza vaccination yearly unless contraindicated. Review of R23's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for five residents (Resident #14, #15, #16, #17 and #18). Additionally, the facility failed to allow residents access to petty cash on an ongoing basis. The facility census was 133. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable Aging Report, dated 11/09/23, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account. Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #14 $725.04 #15 $246.00 #16 $2,788.00 #17 $2,547.66 #18 $1,230.00 Total $7,536.70 During an interview on 11/09/23 at 2:10 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) #1 said he/she was transferred from a sister facility to this facility on 09/26/23 to clean up the resident trust accounts. The BOM #1 was not sure why the previous Business Office Manager did not refund the money and was starting to work on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 80 residents. The facility census was 133. 1. Record review of the facility maintained bank statements for the months 01/2023 through 08/2023 showed no documentation showing any reconciliations. Record review of the facility maintained 09/2023 reconciliation forms, dated 10/05/23, showed the attempted reconciliation had a difference of negative $1,136.62. Record review of the facility maintained 10/2023 reconciliation forms, dated 11/02/23, showed the attempted reconciliation had a difference of negative $403.56. During an interview on 11/09/23 at 10:22 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) #2 said resident fund reconciliations were not being done prior to him/her coming to the facility in 09/2023. The BOM #2 said he/she did not know why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure the protection of resident funds. The facility census was 133. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Bank Statements and Resident Trust Balance Reports for the period 01/2023 through 10/2023, showed an average monthly balance of $214,759.12. Record review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable A/R Aging Report, dated 11/09/23, showed the facility held an average balance of resident funds in the amount of $7,536.70 in the facility operating account. Record review on 11/09/23, of the Department of Health and Senior Services approved bond list showed the facility did not have an approved bond, making the bond insufficient by $324,000. During an interview on 11/09/23 at 4:10 P.M., the Regional Director of Business Office Systems said the previous owners had a resident trust bond but was not sure if there was a new bond.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #13) was free from misappropriation of resident property when the former Social Services Assistant (SSA) A used resident funds for his/her personal use. The facility census was 133. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Statement for the period 05/05/23 through 11/09/23, showed the following withdrawal from Resident #13's account: Date Amount Description 08/22/23 $3,300.00 Personal Needs Items Record review of the facility maintained Resident Face Sheet shows Resident #13 is his/her own responsible party. Record review of the facility maintained paperwork for Resident #13's Resident Trust Statement, showed written authorization for the $3,300.00 withdrawal was not obtained until 10/20/23. Record review of the Facility Self Report on 11/09/23, showed the Social Services Director (SSD), SSA A, and the admissions staff members had a conversation on 10/19/23 about Resident #13 needing clothing, and money…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Resident #4 of all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during his/her stay at the facility. The facility failed to disclose information to the resident regarding a prohibition of cannabis products in the facility and failed to establish a written policy for residents to review and understand prior to or upon admission, as appropriate during the resident's stay, and when the facility's rules change. The census was 131. 1. Review of the Resident #4's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -No behaviors noted; -Diagnoses included depression, osteoarthritis (inflammation of the bone) of hips, and pain in unspecified joint; -Received antidepressants and opioids every day for seven days. Review of the resident's medical record, showed the following: -The resident was his/her own responsible party; -On 7/7/23 at 2:10 P.M., a social services note showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 13 of 14 residents investigated for activities (Residents #68, #84, #7, #94, #38, #40, #8, #31, #41, #90, #15, #11, and #86). The facility failed to have activity staff in sufficient numbers to provide a complete activities program, and failed to ensure the facility assessment addressed activity staff under their staffing plan and/or staff training/education. The facility failed to provide one on one activities to residents, failed to ensure evening activities occurred or have activity staff available to assist residents in attending weekend activities. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The sample was 20. The census was 96. 1. Review of the facility's Statement of Resident Rights, provided to residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-08-31 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing was sufficient to serve meals to residents in a timely manner and meet the needs and preferences of the residents wanting to eat in the dining room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 96. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 6/30/21, showed the following for dietary: -One resident said: it sucks; -One resident said: They're not cooking it, they're short staffed down there; -One resident said: No cooks down there in the evening; -Two residents said: Meals get to rooms considerably later, sometimes lunch is at 2:00, any day, weekends are worse; -One resident said: the dream of eating in the dining room; -Response: We are short staffed, so when we fix our concerns, then we can get back to the dining room. During an interview on 8/19/21 at 8:36 A.M., the dietary manager (DM) said breakfast was served at 8:00 A.M., lunch was served at 12:00 P.M. and dinner was served at 4:30 P.M. The residents received meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and ensure meal service tray temperatures were maintained to at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Seven of seven residents attending the resident council meeting complained about the food, the lack of choices, and the food temperatures. In addition, two residents complained about the food during individual interviews (Resident's #47 and #99). Furthermore, the facility failed to follow standardized recipes for preparing pureed foods. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 96. 1. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated April 28, 2021, showed the following for dietary: -Food is icky, I stopped eating it; -No documentation which resident in attendance voiced this concern; -He/she got sick the same day I did. Saturday and Sunday. I know it was off the food; -No documentation which resident in attendance voiced this concern; -Food is always cold; -Lots of unintended weight loss; -The kitchen has not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident council members with verbal and written responses, actions and rationale taken regarding their concerns. In addition, the facility failed to provide a timely written response to a grievance regarding missing personal items for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #11), in accordance with the facility's grievance policy. The census was 96. Review of the facility's Grievance/Complaints, Filing, revised April 2017, showed the following: -Policy Statement: Resident and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g., the state Ombudsman). -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond for the resident trust fund account in the amount of one and one half times the average monthly balance for the past 12 months. The sample size was 20. The census was 96. Review of the resident trust account for the past 8 months, from December 2020 through July 2021, showed an average monthly balance of $118,000.00. This would yield a required bond in the amount of $177,000.00 (one and one half times the average monthly balance). Review of the bond report for approved facility bonds by the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), dated 2/26/21, showed an approved bond of $175,000.00. During an interview on 8/23/21 at 8:00 A.M., the administrator said it was possibly due to the residents receiving their stimulus checks, which is why the current surety bond is short.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment was followed, in the event the resident was found without signs of life, when the facility failed to maintain accurate, congruent, and easily accessible documentation of advance directives for five residents investigated for accuracy of code status (Residents #15, #11, #71, #100, and #32). The sample was 20. The census was 96. 1. Review of the facility's census and room roster, showed Residents #15 and #11 identified as residing in the locked memory care unit. Observation of the code status book, located at the nurse's station on the locked unit, reviewed on 8/30/21 at 7:45 A.M., showed (Residents #15 and #11) did not have hard copies of advance directive information in it. Review of Resident #15's electronic medical record (EMR), showed the code status listed as do not resuscitate (DNR, no life saving measures performed if the resident were to be found with no signs of life). Review of the documents tab, showed no signed code status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sufficient amount of supplies to meet the care needs of residents in a dignified manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving bathing services in the facility. The census was 96. Review of the Resident's Handbook, revised in 2018, provided upon admission, showed: -admission Agreement; -Our responsibilities: We will provide you with room and board, nursing services, personal and housekeeping services, and routine supplies required by your condition; -Appendix 5, Items and Services Included in the Daily Rate: -Private pay: Items and services included in the daily rate, include nursing services, bathing services, and linen, housekeeping and maintenance services; -Medicare Part A: If you are eligible to receive benefits under the Medicare Part A program, the following services will be covered by the daily rate paid to us, include nursing services, bathing services, and linen, housekeeping, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation when four out of four controlled substance shift change count sheets, for August 2021, were observed to lack consistent documentation of the count of controlled substances at shift change. The census was 96. Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy, revised 12/2012, showed: -Policy statement included: The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances; -Controlled substances must be counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the medication, along with the person delivering the medication, must count the controlled substances together; -Nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. They must document and report any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper storage of medications in three of three treatment carts, and three of four medication carts observed. The treatment carts had medications not labeled properly. The medication carts contained spills over supplement containers, opened food, and improperly labeled medications. The facility had five medication carts and three treatment carts. The census was 96. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised 4/2007, showed: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -Drugs shall be stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they are received; -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing; -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide for requests of additional food at meal times and failed to offer nourishing snacks at bedtime. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 96. 1. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated April 28, 2021, showed the following for dietary: -Food is icky, I stopped eating it; -No documentation which resident in attendance voiced this concern; -He/she got sick the same day I did. Saturday and Sunday. I know it was off the food; -No documentation which resident in attendance voiced this concern; -Food is always cold; -Lots of unintended weight loss; -The kitchen has not been serving fresh fruit. There used to be fruit available anytime. Maybe COVID is an issue. Would bananas and oranges be safer due to their skins?; -We want to use the dining room again. 2. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated May 26, 2021, showed the following for dietary: -Dietary food stinks; -What would make it better; -Starting June 21, new dietary manger; -One resident said: I don't eat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality of life deficiencies related to dietary and activity concerns. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 96. Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, dated 2001 and revised on 2/2020, showed: Policy Statement: -This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents; Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The objective of the QAPI program are to: -Provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life; -Provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators; -Reinforce and build upon effective systems and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff received the required tuberculosis (TB) screening as required per their policy, perform proper hand hygiene when providing personal care for two residents (Residents #16 and #84), ensure a shared electric razor was disinfected between uses (Resident #9), and ensure staff appropriately wore masks to cover both their nose and mouth when around residents or other staff. The census was 96. 1. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis Infection Control Program Policy, revised January 2012, showed: -Policy Statement: The facility recognizes that TB transmission has been identified as a risk in healthcare settings. To try to prevent nosocomial (acquired in house) transmission of TB, our facility has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-31 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed frames, mattresses and bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for six residents (Residents #16, #13, #49, #47, #19 and #39) with side rails to reduce the risks of accidents. The facility identified 22 residents with side rails in use. Residents #16 and #13 were not identified by the facility as having side rails. The sample was 20. The census was 96. Review of the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) documents, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/06, showed bed rails, also called side rails, may be used as a restraint, reminder, or assistive device. Evaluating the gaps in hospital beds is one component of a mitigation strategy to reduce entrapment. Hospital beds have seven potential entrapment zones. The neck, head, and chest are the key body parts at risk for life-threatening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two of two sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services (Residents #47 and #93). The sample was 20. The census was 96. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential liability for payment for the non-covered services. The SNF's responsibility to provide notice to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required, within a two-hour time frame, for three residents (Residents #304, #7, and #73). The sample was 20. The census was 96. Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, revised July 2017, showed: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported; -Role of the Administrator: If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown source is reported, the administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual; -Role of the Investigator: The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum: -Review the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate discharge procedures and complete discharge and/or transfer documentation for two residents discharged from the facility (Residents #550 and #303). The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #550's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/7/20, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for ambulation, transfers, bed mobility and personal hygiene; -Impairment to bilateral legs; -Received physical therapy (PT) four days a week and occupational therapy (OT) five days a week. -Diagnoses included progressive neurological conditions, high blood pressure and diabetes. Review of the medical record, showed a notice of Medicare non-coverage issued on 4/6/21 with the effective date on non-coverage as 4/8/21. The resident signed the form on 4/6/21 to verify he/she received the notice. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #310). The resident's care plan did not address his/her wounds, pressure ulcers, potential for pain, refusal of care and did not specify the amount of staff assistance needed with his/her activities of daily living (ADLs). The census was 96. Review of Resident #310's progress notes, dated 9/1/20 at 11:17 P.M., showed he/she was admitted around 6:30 P.M. The resident's admitting diagnoses were respiratory failure and septic shock (a life-threatening condition that happens when blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level after an infection). The resident had a large wound to his/her lower right abdomen fold stretching to his/her groin area along with a quarter sized open area to his/her coccyx (a small triangular bone at the base of the spinal column) and another one right below it. The resident had generalized weakness, flaccid (hanging loosely or limply) right arm and edema to his/her bilateral lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled/desired. Twenty residents were sampled and problems were identified with three (Residents #19, #94 and #99). In addition, one resident selected as an expanded sample complained of not receiving showers (Resident #39). The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/16/21, showed: -Adequate hearing and vision; -Clear speech - distinct intelligible words; -Ability to express ideas and wants: Understood; -Ability to understand others: Understands - clear comprehension; -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive assessment) score of 15 of 15, which indicates intact cognition; -Rejection of care: Behavior not exhibited; -Total dependence of two (+) persons required for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use; -Total dependence of one person required for personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to monitor the effectiveness of medication, and to notify the physician to address the abnormal medication level, for a one resident (Resident #84). The resident had a seizure disorder and required the use of anti-seizure medications. The facility failed to ensure the medication was administered in sufficient amount to ensure a therapeutic level. This resulted in the lab test, used to determine if the medication was at a therapeutic level, showing the levels as below therapeutic range. The facility failed to notify the physician that the levels were below therapeutic range. This resulted in the resident having seizure activity resulting an abrasion to the head. The facility census was 96. Review of Resident #84's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/2/21, showed neurological issues with aphasia (inability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 19 residents who resided on the secured unit when the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained at a safe level below 120 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F). In addition, staff failed to implement a care planned intervention to encourage the resident to use a walker for ambulation, and left one resident on the toilet unattended who required supervision (Resident's #41, and #94). The census was 96. 1. Review of facility's Safety of Water Temperatures policy, undated and reviewed on 8/23/21 at 8:03 A.M., showed water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 120°F or the maximum allowable temperature per state regulation. Observation of the third floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff positioned two residents' urinary catheter drainage bags off the floor. The facility identified seven residents with indwelling urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the bladder of urine. Urine is collected in a drainage bag until emptying). Of those seven, five were sampled and problems were identified with two. (Residents #99 and #57). The census was 96. Review of the facility Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated 2001 and revised on 2014, showed: Purpose: -The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection;; Infection Control: -Use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage system; -Maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag; -Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor; -Empty the drainage bag at least every eight hours. 1. Review of Resident #99's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of five residents investigated for nutrition (Resident #68 and #86). This resulted in both residents experiencing a significant weight loss. The sample was 20. The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #68's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/2/21, showed: -Severely impaired cognition; -Extensive assistance with eating; -Diagnoses included progressive neurological conditions including aphasia (difficulty forming and expressing spoken words) and Multiple Sclerosis (a progressive decline in neuromuscular function); -Recorded weight of 131 pounds (lbs); -Care Area Assessment Summary (CAAS): Cognitive loss/dementia and nutritional status triggered. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Extensive assistance with eating;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents using bed/side rails, had adequate assessments to determine the side rails were appropriate and safe to be used and/or had physician's orders. The facility identified 22 residents with side rails in use. Two of 20 sampled residents (Residents #16 and #63) and one expanded resident (Resident #13) had side rails but were not identified by the facility as having them. The census was 96. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails policy, revised December 2016, showed: -The purposes of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms; -Physical restraints are defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on residents that are complete and readily accessible in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for two of 20 sampled residents (Residents #251 and #250). The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #251's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/20, showed: -admission date: 10/26/20; -Severe cognitive impairment; -No moods or behaviors; -Total dependence with activities of daily living; -Diagnoses of medically complex conditions, high blood pressure, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and asthma; -Feeding tube; -Tracheostomy Care (an opening in the front of the neck so a tube may be inserted so the person can breathe). Review of the resident's hospital record, dated 1/16/21, showed: -Chief complaint: Dislodged trachea; -History of Present Illness: The resident was unable to give any history. The resident's family member provided history over the phone. It is unclear how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-08-31 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain reports with respect to infection control surveys and complaint investigations made during the preceding three years, for review by residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. The census was 96. Observation on all days of the survey, from 8/19/21 through 8/31/21, showed a survey binder displayed across from the receptionist's desk near the front entrance to the facility. Review of the survey binder, showed the binder contained annual survey results from April 2019, but did not contain the results of any infection control surveys or complaint investigations completed October through December 2019, 2020, or January through June 2021. During an interview on 8/31/21 at 8:44 A.M., the administrator said she is responsible for updating the survey binder, which has been by the receptionist's desk since July 2021. The binder should contain documentation of all inspections completed within the past three years, including annual surveys, infection control surveys, and complaint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure temperatures were taken for the walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer of the main kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 96. Observation on 8/19/21 at 8:36 A.M., of the kitchen, showed no temperature logs for the walk-in refrigerator and freezer. During an interview on 8/24/21 at 6:07 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) M said prior to 8/19/21, they were taking the temperatures of the walk-in freezer and refrigerator, but were not documenting the temperatures. They were short-staffed, but began recording the temperatures after 8/19/21. During an interview on 8/31/21 at 9:04 A.M., the administrator said the kitchen was short-staffed. Temperature logs should be recorded and maintained in the kitchen.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$122,846 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $23,741 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
  • $17,165 — penalty dated 2024-02-02
  • $63,591 — penalty dated 2023-09-28
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-19 for 8 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-10 for 28 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VHS MO OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2023
MILLER, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
CLAYTON ROAD CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
MAYLACK, ELIZABETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
MITCHELL, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$474K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 5%Other / private 16%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $474K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$307per resident / day
operating cost
$9,319per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$267per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next