No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Joseph Chateau

811 North 9th Street, Saint Joseph, MO 64501 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 69 certified beds · (816) 233-5164 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 233-5164 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Apr 2022Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0568, F0570)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568, F0570)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1515 Saint Joseph Ave · (816) 233-3338 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1517 Saint Joseph Ave · (816) 279-2590 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1201 Frederick Ave · (816) 238-4930 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(816) 271-5500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.3%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms70.2%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.4%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.3%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table68.9%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission42.2%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%13.7%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.062.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.442.331.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 0.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.8–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge0.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge0.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge9.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
40.7%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 67.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.67 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-07)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one resident to return to the facility without a documented reason that the resident's needs could not be met (Resident #1). This affected one resident of five residents sampled. The facility's census was 68.Request for the facility policy on Transfers and Discharges was not provided by the facility. 1. Review of Resident's admission Record, dated 9/11/25, showed:- Resident had a court appointed guardian as the responsible party;- Diagnosis included: major depressive disorder, diabetes, pulmonary disease (respiratory system), traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia;Review of Resident's Care Plan, revised on 8/21/25, showed:- Resident was adjusting to new surroundings and would like help getting comfortable in his/her new home. Staff should help resident maintain preferences in his/her daily living;- Resident and Guardian wish for resident to stay at the facility long term; Staff to evaluate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written 30-day notice of discharge, the bed hold policy, a discharge summary, and the reason for discharge to one resident's (Resident #1) representative in writing out of the 5 residents sampled, and additionally failed to provide the statement of appeal rights, or the name, address, or telephone number of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (advocates for the residents in nursing facilities) and failed to notify the Ombudsman that the resident was discharged . The facility's census was 68.A request was made for the facility's Discharge Policy but was not provided.1. Review of Resident's admission Record, dated 9/11/25, showed:- Resident had a court appointed guardian as the responsible party;- Diagnosis included: major depressive disorder, diabetes, pulmonary disease (respiratory system), traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia;Review of the Resident's Care Plan, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a safe, clean, comfortable environment for the residents when staff failed to keep all areas of the facility clean and in good repair and did not act on recommendations of the pest control contractor to maintain areas of the building to prevent rodents. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility's Pest Control Program policy, dated 9/1/22, included; it is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice and rats). Review of the facility's Routine Cleaning and Disinfection policy, dated 9/1/21 included: -It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible. -Cleaning refers to the removal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were cared for in a dignified way that a reasonable person would expect, when they failed to cover two resident's skin while in common areas of the building. This affected two of 16 sampled residents (Resident #47 and Resident #32). The facility additionally failed to provide a dignified dining experience when the noise levels were so great in the dining room, that one resident (Resident #14) no longer ate in the dining room due to the noise. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility provided policy, Promoting and Maintaining Resident Dignity, date reviewed 9/1/22 showed in part: -It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. -All staff members are involved in providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 56 residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Record review of the facility maintained bank statements for account ending in #8793 for months 03/2023 through 02/2024 showed no documentation of reconciliations. Record review of the facility maintained reconciliation forms for account ending in #8793, dated 03/2023 through 02/2024, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of reconciliation. Email correspondence dated 04/02/24 at 4:23 P.M., showed the Business Office Manager said the reconciliations were not reconciled properly. During an interview on 04/08/24 at 2:28 P.M., the Business Office Manager said the resident trust accounts did not reconcile.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a safe, clean, comfortable environment for the residents when staff did not keep all areas of the facility clean and safe. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility provided policy, Safe and Homelike environment, dated 9/1/21 showed: -In accordance with resident's rights the facility will provide a safe, clean homelike environment; -Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment; -The facility will maintain adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas; -Minimize odors by disposing of soiled linens promptly and reporting lingering odors to the Housekeeping department; -Report any unresolved environmental concerns to the Administrator. Review of the facility provided policy Routine Cleaning, dated 9/1/21 showed: -Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces Review of the facility provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible parties and the reasons for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood. The notice should include the effective date of discharge or transfer; the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and electronic mail), telephone number of the entity which receives requests and information on how to obtain the appeal form and assistance in completing and submitting it; the name, address (mailing and electronic mail)and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and for residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing, electric mail (e-mail) address and telephone number of the agency for protection and advocacy for individuals with mental disorders established under the Protection and Advocacy for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of quality when staff failed to ensure blood sugars were checked prior to meal which affected two of 16 sampled residents, (Resident #32 and #53), failed to obtain blood sugar on the day the physician ordered for Resident #53, failed to obtain an order to check blood sugars for Resident #32, and failed to clarify a Vitamin D3 supplement order for Resident #41. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's policy for medication administration, revised 9/1/22, showed, in part: - Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. 1. Review of Resident #53's physician order sheet (POS), dated March 2024, showed: - Order date: 8/23/22 - Check blood sugars weekly, one time a day every Saturday related to diabetes mellitus. Notify physician if blood sugar is less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight, and failed to ensure scheduled maintenance of the bed rail, for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #19) who used side rails. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility ' s undated Side Rails Policy showed: -After an attempted alternative to side rails have been made, the facility shall: -Assess the resident for risk of entrapment and other risks; -Obtain a physician ' s order for the use of the side rail; -The facility shall ensure correct installation and maintenance of the bed rails prior to use; -Ensuring the bed dimensions are appropriate for the resident; -Inspecting and regularly checking the mattress and bed rails for gaps and areas of possible entrapment; -The maintenance director or designee is responsible for adhering to a routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) reports for November 2023 and January 2024, completed by the pharmacist, and additionally the facility failed to ensure they addressed recommendations with Resident #5's physician by midnight of the next calendar day. This affected three out of 16 sampled residents, (Resident #5, #19 and # 39). The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review and Reporting policy dated, January 2024, showed: -Resident specific Medication Regimen Review (RR) recommendations and findings are documented and acted upon by the nursing care center and/or physician; -A record of the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations is made available in an easily retrievable format to nurses, physicians and the care planning team with 48 hours of RR completion; -For those issues that require a physician intervention, the attending physician either accepts and acts upon the report and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. This affected three out of 16 sampled residents residents (Resident #33, #34, and #47). The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Food Temperatures at Point of Service, reviewed 7/14/23, showed: -Food will be prepared, held and served in a manner that preserves nutritive value and palatability; -Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above and cold foods will be held at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below prior to serving to maintain food safe; -Best efforts will be made to present hot food hot and cold food cold at point of service by using thermal lids and bases, heated or chilled plates and thermal pellets as necessary; -Food service staff will monitor palatability of food at point of service by periodic test tray evaluation and review of resident council concerns. 1. Review of the resident's #34's Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared foods in a consistency designed to meet the needs of individual residents, when they did not ensure the pureed (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) food had a smooth and appropriate consistency. This affected three out of 16 sampled residents (Residents #5, #19, and #47) by causing a choking hazard. The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide the requested policy on pureed food preparation. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders Policy, revised 4/7/22, showed: Staff should follow all medical provider orders timely. Review of the facility's undated Therapeutic Diets Policy showed: -Mechanically altered diets will be considered therapeutic diets; -A therapeutic diet must be prescribed by the physician. 1. Review of the Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/9/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when the ceilings, walls, floors, and vents were covered in dirt and debris, and when the walls, floors and ceilings were not in good repair, and when the freezers were not clean, and contained opened and undated food. This could potentially impact all residents by dirt or debris coming in contact with food and food preparation areas. Additionally food that is open and undated can be potentially hazardous due to spoilage. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's undated Cleaning Ceilings policy showed: -Ceilings will be cleaned to avoid soil build-up; -Vacuum ceilings; -Remove all cobwebs; -All light shields shall be cleaned and cleared of all debris; -Ceilings shall be cleaned as necessary or at a minimum of twice a year. Review of the facility's undated Sanitation of the Dietary Department showed: -The dietary staff shall maintain the sanitation of the dietary department through compliance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to maintain quarterly quality assessment committee (QAA) meetings with the required members. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 9/1/2021 showed: -The Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall consist of a minimum of the Director of Nursing, the Medical Director or his/her designee, the infection preventionist and at least three other members of the facility staff. Shall meet at least quarterly Review of the facility provided sign in sheets for April 2023 through March 2024 showed: -The committee had meetings April 2023, June 2023, October 2023, January 2024 and March 2024 -The Medical Director signed as attending June 21, 2023 and March 1, 2024. -There was no sign in sheet for the quarter between June 2023 and October 2023 During an interview on 3/28/24 at 4:57 P.M. the Director of Nursing said: -She does not know who is responsible for QAA and QAPI as the coordinator. -She attends meetings and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Observation, record review and interview showed the facility failed to follow infection control standards and guidelines for medication administration when staff touched medications with ungloved hands for two residents (Resident #41 and #36). Additionally staff failed to provide annual tuberculosis testing for three residents (Resident #20, #24 and #47) ) of 16 sampled residents. the facility census was 62. Review of the facility provided policy Medication Administration, revised 9/1/22 showed: - Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; - Remove medication from source, taking care not to touch medication with bare hand. Review of the facility provided policy Infection Prevention and Control Program, reviewed/revised 5/15/23 showed: -This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent gnats facility wide and mice droppings in two residents' rooms (Resident #24 and Resident #55), potentially effecting all residents. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility provided policy Pest Control reviewed/revised 9/1/22 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents (e.g. mosquitos, flies, mice and rats). Observation on 3/25/24 at 11:47 A.M., showed on the 200 hallway there were multiple gnats in various resident's rooms. Observation on 3/25/24 at 12:02 P.M. showed there were multiple gnats in the dining room. Observations on 3/27/24 at 10:18 A.M. showed there were multiple gnats in the hall, the beauty shop, and front office area. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 10:03 A.M. Certified Nurse Aide A said: - He/She picked up wet sheets that morning and there were a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal and urinary catheter care to two of 16 sampled residents, (Resident #20 and #33). The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy for perineal care or catheter care. 1. Review of Resident #20's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/15/24 showed: - Long and short term memory problems; - Upper and lower extremities impaired on one side; - Dependent on staff for toilet use, dressing and transfers; - Always incontinent of bowel and bladder (the inability to control urine or bowel movements) - Diagnoses included aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), stroke, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision while eating for one resident out of 16 sampled residents (Resident #5) who is a choking risk while dining in his/her room per the resident's care plan. The facility census was 62. The facilty did not provide the requested policy on accidents. 1. Review of the Resident #5's care plan dated 10/23/23, showed: - ADL self-care performance deficit due to right sided hemiplegia; -The resident is dependent on staff for meeting emotional and physical needs related to cognitive deficits; - The resident has had choking episode while eating related to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); - The resident is to be monitored by staff while eating. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/9/24 showed; - Severe cognitive impairment; - Substantial assistance with Activities of daily living (ADLs); - The resident had hallucinations (a false…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant weight loss of more than 10% of the resident's body weight in a 3 month period for one sampled resident who was at nutritional risk and received dialysis (Resident #3) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Review of the facility provided policy Weight Monitoring, dated 9/1/22 showed: -Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual or desirable body weight. -Interventions will be identified, implemented, monitored and modified (as appropriate), consistent with the resident's assessed needs, choices, preferences, goals, and current professional standards to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. -A significant change in weight is defined as: 5% change in weight in 1 month (30 days), 7.5% change in weight in 3 months (90 days), 10% change in weight in 6 months (180 days). -The physician should be informed of a significant change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-19 · tag F0562 — widespread
    Provide immediate access to any resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, the facility failed to provide resident representatives and health care professionals access to residents when the facility failed to have continuous phone service available in the facility from 11/24/23 to 12/10/23. This effected two reaidents, when resident #4 was unable to make a phone call to family and when health care professionals were unable to speak to the facility's nursing staff regarding resident #1's care in the emergency room when phones were unanswered by the facility. The facility census was 63. Review of facility policy, resident rights, dated 9/1/21 showed: -Facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing in language that the resident understands of his or her rights and all rules an regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/23, showed: -A Brief Interview Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible parties and the reasons for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood when staff transferred three of eight sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) to the hospital. The facility census was 63. The facility did not provide a policy on transfer agreements. Review of facility admission packet on hospital transfers, undated, showed: -Facility will arrange for transfer of resident to a hospital when such a transfer is ordered by the attending physician or by another physician, or in the event of an emergency and a physician is not reasonably available. -Resident shall be responsible for payment of transportation charges and other costs of such transfer not paid by Medicaid program, the Medicare program of the Veterans Administration. Unless resident directs the facility otherwise, Resident conseents to Resident's transfer to any hospital at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-19 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided a notice of their bed-hold policy before transferring three of eight sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) to the hospital. The facility census was 63. Review of facility's Bed Hold Agreement, undated, showed: -In the event resident is transferred for a hospitalization, therapeutic, or other permissible leave, the resident will be notified of the rate at the time the Resident is temporarily discharged , or within 24 hours in case of an emergency transfer. 1. Review of Resident #1's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/1/23, showed: -A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen, which indicated resident was cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid), depression, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assistance to dependent residents with grooming and showers when they failed to provide at least two showers a week to six residents (Resident #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8) of the sampled eight. The facility census was 63. Review of facility policy, activities of daily living (ADLs), dated 9/1/21, showed: -The facility will ensure a resident's abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -This included the resident's ability to: Bathe, dress, and groom; -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of facility policy, bathing a resident, dated 9/1/21, showed: -It was the practice of the facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene and help prevent skin issues. Review of facility policy, promoting/maintaining resident dignity, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent flies. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility provided policy Pest Control Program dated 9/1/22 showed in part: -It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests (e.g. bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice and rats). -The facility will utilize a variety of methods in controlling certain seasonal pests, such as flies. These will involve indoor and outdoor methods that are deemed appropriate. During an interview on 10/5/23 at 11:03 A.M. Resident #10 said: -His/Her job was to kill flies. -He/She killed 27 flies a few days ago. -The flies crawled on everything -He/She had maggots in a wound because of the flies. -The flies are not as bad now that he/she is getting a daily bath. Observation on 10/5/23 at 11:03 A.M. room [ROOM NUMBER] showed : -Multiple flies in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify one resident's (Resident #10) primary care physician and medical director of a wound contaminated by maggots. The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy on notification of the physician. Review of Resident #10 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) dated 9/16/23 showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15: indicated no cognitive deficit. -No behaviors exhibited. -Extensive Assistance on staff for personal hygiene. -Supervision of staff for dressing, walking and using the toilet. -No pressure ulcers. -No venous/arterial ulcers. -No lesions of the foot. -Diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF: A weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs.), hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm), obesity, edema, and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's Comprehensive Care plan dated 9/6/23 showed: -He/She had an actual impairment to his/her skin. He/She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program during a Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19, an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), to provide a safe environment for all residents. The facility failed to follow the facility's policy for infection prevention and control program when staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering SARS-CoV-2 positive rooms. The deficient practice affected five (Resident #1, #2, #3, #8, #10) of ten sampled residents. The facility census was 62. Review of facility policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 5/15/23, showed: -The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines. - All staff are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-29 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents knew were to find the name and phone number of the local ombudsman. The facility census was 62. Observation on all days of the survey, 4/24/22 through 4/29/22, showed a black picture frame hanging on the wall outside the administrator's office with what looked like a piece of typing paper and OMBUDSMAN typed on it along with two phone numbers. The sign did not include the name of the local Ombudsman or the address of the office. During a group meeting on 4/25/22 at 10:04 A.M., 21 residents present said they did not know the name of the local local Ombudsman. During an interview on 4/28/22 at 9:58 A.M., the Administrator said the local Ombudsman has not been here since the last one left employment. They had a volunteer but had to ask for them to not come back to the facility because of issues they had with some of the residents and how they talked to the residents. They do have the phone number posted but no other information posted.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Food Storage: Dry Goods policy, dated 9/2017, showed: -All dry good will be appropriately stored in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. -All items will be stored on shelves at lease 6 inches above the floor. -Foods stored on moveable racks or dollies may be stored at less than 6 inches from the floor. -Items will not be stored within 18 inches of a sprinkler unit. -The Dining Services Director or designee regularly inspects the dry storage area to ensure it is well lit, well ventilated and not subject to sewage or wastewater backflow or contamination by condensation, leakage, rodents, or vermin. -All packaged and canned food items will be kept clean, dry and properly sealed. -Storage areas will be neat, arranged, for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate. -Toxic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they submitted their current bond to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) for approval after increasing their bond amount covering the Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account. The facility census was 62. Review of the DHSS data base, which tracks the most up to date information regarding approved bonds for RTF accounts for all facilities that hold resident monies showed an approved bond amount of $45,000 approved by DHSS on 8/9/19. Review of the Resident Funds Bonds Worksheet, a form used by DHSS to determine what the facility's bond should be and if they have the appropriate approved amount for their bond, showed: -The average balance for the previous twelve months in the facility's RFT bank account was $61,517.84 -The approved bond amount should be $93,000.00. Review of the rider from the facility's casualty insurance company who holds their RTF account bond, dated 7/1/2021, showed: -A bond increase from $45,000 to $135,000 was approved and was effected 8/10/2021. The amount of $135,000 is effective until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a safe, clean, comfortable environment for the residents when staff did not keep all areas of the facility clean and safe. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Deep Clean Calendar for April 2022, showed 31 resident rooms were scheduled for deep cleaning during the month along with several offices. Review of the undated Route 1 cleaning schedule showed: - 5-Step Room Cleaning: 1 Pull Trash 2 Dust Horizontals 3 Clean walls 4 Sweep floors 5 Damp mop floors - 7-Step Restroom Cleaning: 1 Check paper supplies 2 Pull trash 3 Dust mop floor 4 Clean mirror 5 Clean sink and tub 6 Clean toilet 7 Damp mop floor - check underneath/behind furniture when sweeping and mopping - Perform morning walk-thru of your area (address any spills, full trash containers, etc.) - Cross off each common area as you clean it! - Common Areas and Office to Clean (check off as you go) Public/restrooms (AM) Front Offices MDS (minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they allowed residents the opportunity to voice grievances to the facility, failed to ensure they made prompt efforts to resolve any grievances, failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the residents, and failed to ensure they responded in writing to all grievances. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's July 2018 policy titled Customer Concern (Grievance) policy showed the purpose of the the policy was to support each resident's right to voice concerns (grievances) and to ensure after receiving a concern, the center actively seeks a resolution and keeps the customer appropriately apprised of its progress toward resolution. The goal is to encourage open communication of customer concerns in an environment free from reprisal, retaliation or discrimination. We have a commitment to customer service and have systems in place to address concerns. Our Grievance Official is the Center Administrator. The Grievance Official's contact information including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, which affected two of 17 sampled residents (Residents #8 and #18). The facility census was 62. Review of the Resident's Rights and Quality of Life policy, dated 5/1/12, showed it is the policy that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. The policy did not address how to ensure residents' dignity was preserved, providing showers or ensuring residents had services provided in a timely manner or according to their preferences. 1. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/2/22, showed: - A brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure their activity director (AD) completed an approved training course through the State of Missouri. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy regarding training for the activity director. During a group interview with residents on 4/25/22 at 10:02 A.M., 21 residents said if staff are not able to assist them with an activity, the residents usually do them themselves. Some residents will call bingo so the activity can happen. Weekends are very laid back (watch movie, coloring, word search, watch church on TV). There is not really a lot to do. They feel the AD is doing a good job, he/she just needs to be trained more on what they need. During an interview on 4/28/22 at 1:52 P.M., the AD said: - He/she has been doing activities for about one year. He/she had not been through any type of training and no class or certification program for his/her job. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator trained him/her on how to complete assessments in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who entered the facility without limited range of motion (ROM) did not experience a reduction of their ROM when they failed to provided a restorative nursing program which affected two of 17 sampled residents (Residents #9 and #18). The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Restorative (RA) Guideline, dated June 2019, showed restorative services refers to nursing interventions to assist the resident in reaching his/her highest level and then maintain that function. The RA program is: - Generally, RA programs are initiated when a resident is discharged from formalized therapy. - Each resident will be screened or evaluated by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for inclusion into the appropriate center RA program when referred by therapy or the IDT. - The IDT jointly decides that the resident would benefit from a RA program based upon current functional status. - A RA program does not require a physician's order. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they assessed residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, failed to review the risk and benefits with the resident or the resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation, and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight for three of 17 residents (Residents #4, #38 and #61). The facility census was 62. The facility did not have a policy for the use of bed rails. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/17/22, showed: - Independent with bed mobility and transfers; - Diagnoses included: high blood pressure, neurogenic bladder, anxiety disorder, depression, manic depression, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Paralytic gait (spastic gait, common in patients with cerebral palsy or multiple sclerosis, spastic gait is a way of walking in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and training to provide nursing and related services to provide safe and effective transfers for two residents (Resident #61 and #8) of seventeen sampled residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility policy for transfers dated 4/16/20 showed: - Administrator will designate a lift champion who is responsible for assuring the complete cooperation and compliance with our company's no lift policies and procedures. The champion must be a licensed healthcare provider. -A licensed healthcare provider will evaluate every resident at admission, readmission, and with any change in condition to establish if they have a need for a mechanical lift, which type of transfer, sling size, and number of team members required to use the lift for each resident. Evaluation is to be completed on PCC (point click care, facilities electronic records) after licensed healthcare provider does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they reported irregularities found by the consultant pharmacist to the attending physician in a timely manner for them to act on and failed to ensure the attending physician documented the identified irregularities had been reviewed and what action was taken. This affected one of 17 sampled residents (Resident #29). The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy for ensuring the pharmacy consultant reports were communicated to the physician. 1. Review of Resident #29's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - A BIMS of 13, indicating no cognitive impairment; - Independent with bed mobility, transferring between surfaces, and walking; supervision with toilet use; and limited staff assistance with dressing and personal hygiene; - Diagnoses included high blood pressure, thyroid disorder, arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); - On a scheduled pain medication regimen; did not receive PRN pain medications in last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they administered residents' medications with an error rate not greater than 5 percent (%). The facility staff made 10 errors out of 26 opportunities for error with an error rate of 38.46%, which affected three residents (Resident #25, #36 and #38) of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's medication pass times showed staff should be passing medications at the following times in the morning : - 6:00 A.M.; - A.M. (6:00 to 10:00 A.M.); - 7:30 A.M.; - 9:30 A.M.; - 11:00 A.M. Review of the 2014 Medication Administration Competency Checklist, provide by the facility as their policy, showed: - Assessment: Checked accuracy and completeness of the medication administration record (MAR), clarified incomplete or unclear orders; - Crushed medications separately if patient/resident has difficulty swallowing, used pill crushing device properly, mixed medication with soft food; - Took medication to resident at correct time, applied six rights of medication administration; - Gave…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff discarded expired medications and discarded medications from discharged residents. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility policy, dated 1/1/13, on storage of medications showed: - Staff should ensure medications are stored in an orderly manner. - Medications must have an expiration date on the label. - Staff must not retain medications longer than recommended by the manufacturer. - Once staff opened a medication, staff should follow manufacture's guidelines with respect for expiration for opened medications. - Staff must ensure that expired medications should be destroyed. - Staff must inspect medication storage areas for proper storage compliance on a regularly scheduled basis. Review of the Incruse Inhaler (used to treat lung conditions) package insert, dated June 2019 showed staff should discard the inhaler 60 days after opening. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received foods prepared in a way to conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, and failed to serve foods in a safe and appetizing manner. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Meal Distribution policy, dated 9/2017, showed: -Meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. -All meals will be assembled in accordance with the individual diet order, plan of care and preferences. -All food items will be transported promptly for appropriate temperature maintenance. -All foods that are transported to dining areas that are not adjacent to the kitchen will be covered. -The nursing staff will be responsible to verifying meal accuracy and the timely delivery of meals to residents. -For the point-of-service dining, the Dining Services department staff, under the supervision of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods in a way to conserve the nutritive value, flavor and appearance when staff did not follow the recipe for preparing pureed roast pork, mashed potatoes, mixed vegetables and bread with butter. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility Therapeutic Diets policy dated 9/2017 showed: -All residents have a diet order, including regular, therapeutic, and texture modification, that is prescribed by the attending physician, physician extender, or credentialed practitioner in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines. -Therapeutic diet is defined as a diet ordered by a physician, or delegated registered or licensed dietitian, as part of the treatment for a disease or clinical condition. The purpose of a therapeutic diet is to eliminate or decrease specific nutrients in the diet or to increase specific nutrients in the diet or to provide food that a resident is able to eat (mechanically altered diet). -Mechanically altered diet means one in which the texture of the diet is altered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices when staff did not wash their hands during medication pass and when providing perineal care to prevent the spread of infection, which affected six of 17 sampled residents (Resident #6, #25, #29, #38, #61 and #63). The facility also failed to administer the Two-Step Tuberculin (TB) test appropriately, read, and document the results of the test in a timely manner, and failed to maintain record of conducting the staff's TB testing for seven of nine sampled employees. The facility's census was 62. Review of the facility's COVID-19 Education, Prevention and Response Guide, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, dated March 2020, provided as the facility's policy on handwashing, showed the facility's policy considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent spread of infections. All team members shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated all residents with dignity and respect when staff did not serve all residents seated at one table at the same time, leaving some residents to sit and watch their tablemates eat which affected all residents who eat in the main and assistive dining rooms and when staff did not talk with one of 17 sampled residents (Resident #8) when staff moved the resident's wheelchair abruptly two different times, causing the resident to flip backwards and then pitch forward abruptly. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights and Quality of Life policy, dated 5/1/12, showed it is the policy of Advocate that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. The list of resident rights did not include the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Review of the facility's posted meal times showed: - Breakfast: *Main dining room: 7:00 A.M. *Assisted dining room:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they considered the views of the resident group and acted promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility and could not demonstrate their responses and rationale for those responses. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's July 2018 policy titled Customer Concern (Grievance) policy showed the purpose of the the policy was to support each resident's right to voice concerns (grievances) and to ensure after receiving a concern, the center actively seeks a resolution and keeps the customer appropriately apprised of its progress toward resolution. The goal is to encourage open communication of customer concerns in an environment free from reprisal, retaliation or discrimination. We have a commitment to customer service and have systems in place to address concerns. Our Grievance Official is the Center Administrator. The Grievance Official's contact information including phone number and email address, will be readily available to any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they informed residents of their rights periodically during residents' stay both orally and in writing. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights and Quality of Life policy, dated 5/1/12, showed: - It is the policy of Advocate that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. - The policy listed out all of the residents' rights. - The policy did not specifically indicate when these rights should be communicated with the residents. Observation on all days of the facility showed a framed poster listing the all the residents' rights hung on the wall at the start of the 200 hall. 20 of the facility's 62 residents resided on the 200 hall. This hall is located far away from the main portion of the facility and not a location that many residents see. During a group interview on 4/25/22 at 10:02 A.M., 21 residents in attendance said resident rights are only reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they conducted a complete criminal background check (CBC), and maintain copies of staff's Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) letters, checks of the Employee Disqualification List (EDL), and nurse aide (NA) registry which included nine of nine sampled staff. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy, dated January 2019, showed: -To prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property and to ensure reporting and investigation of alleged violations in accordance with Federal and State Laws. -Team Member-This designation equals employee/staff. -Each center will follow any and all state specific requirements. -Potential team members shall, at a minimum, have the following screening checks conducted: -Reference checks with previous employers and/or current employers -Appropriate licensing board or registry check -Drug testing per company policy -Criminal background check pursuant to company policy or state law -Office of Inspector General (OIG)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure they completed a thorough investigation into one of 17 sampled resident's (Resident #4) allegations of verbal abuse from a staff member when staff failed to interview the resident. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation policy, dated January 2019, showed the purpose of the policy was to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property and to ensure reporting and investigation of alleged violations (to include injuries of unknown source, mistreatment, and involuntary seclusion) in accordance with Federal and State Laws. If actual violation or alleged violation occurs, the resident will be immediately assessed and removed from any potential harm (if applicable). The administrator, or designee, will over the center in conducting an internal investigation against any violation/alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, injury of unknown source, misappropriation of resident property, involuntary seclusion and report the results of the investigation to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained evidence of Level II screenings and any determinations of the need for a Preadmission Screening (PASRR) for two of 17 sampled residents Residents #6 and #9) who required Level II screenings. The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy for completing Level I or Level II screenings and maintaining PASRR reports. 1. Review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/2/21, showed: - admission date of 1/12/17; - Staff did indicated no the resident had not been evaluated by Level II PASRR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition; did not indicate whether or not the resident had a serious mental illness, mental retardation or other related condition; - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive deficit; - A Resident Mood Interview score of 00, indicating no presence of depression; - No behaviors during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one of two sampled closed residents (Resident #64). The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy addressing discharge summaries. 1. Review of Resident #64's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 4/20/22 included the following: - The resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. - Resident had physical and verbal behaviors directed at others. - Family participated in the assessment. - Resident did not plan to return to the community. Review of the nurses' notes dated 2/1/22 at 11:40 A.M. showed the facility transferred the resident to another facility. The resident went to the new facility's memory care unit. Review the of resident's medical record did not show a discharge summary. During an interview on 4/28/22 at 4:41 P.M., the facility administrator said the resident did not have a discharge summary. There was a discharge nurses' note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they assisted one of 17 sampled residents (Resident #4) with performing activities of daily living (ADLs) when staff did not assist the resident when he/she wanted to take showers. Review of the Resident's Rights and Quality of Life policy, dated 5/1/12, showed it is the policy that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. The policy did not address how to ensure residents' dignity was preserved, providing showers or ensuring residents had services provided in a timely manner or according to their preferences. 1. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/17/22, showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicted no cognitive impairment; - Independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs) but needed one person physical assistance for bathing; impairment of both lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications when staff failed to act on recommendations made by their consultant pharmacist to reduce medication doses and failed to ensure residents did not maintain as needed (PRN) narcotics beyond 14 days without reevaluation by the physician. This affected two of 17 sampled residents (Resident #8 and #29). The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy for unnecessary medications. 1. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/2/22, showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment; - Needed extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene; total staff assistance with toilet use, moving on and off the nursing unit and transferring from surface to surface; - Diagnoses included: high blood pressure, diabetes, high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-04-29 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure they posted an accurate accounting of their nursing staff who worked each shift. The facility's census was 62. Observation on all days of the survey, 4/24/22 through 4/29/22, showed they did not post the nursing staff who worked each shift. During an interview on 4/29/22 at 9:56 A.M., the Director of Nursing said the nurse staffing is posted by the nurses' station. It must not be in a conspicuous spot if the surveyors could not find it.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 51.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VHS MO OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2023
MILLER, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
NORTH 9TH STREET CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
ABBAS, MARGHOOBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2024
CLARK, KRISTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
DILWORTH, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$206K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 2%Other / private 15%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $206K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$207per resident / day
operating cost
$6,280per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$192per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265852. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next