No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Renton Health & Rehabilitation

80 Southwest Second Street, Renton, WA 98057 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (425) 226-4610 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0610) — cited Sep 2023Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$256,725 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0610), cited Sep 2023
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $256,725 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-25)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
64 Rainier Ave S · (425) 224-2144 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
275 Rainier Ave S · (425) 277-0212 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
81 S Tobin St · (425) 228-8863 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Perimeter Rd W · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
200 SW Langston Rd · (425) 979-1994

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.6%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.8%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%2.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.4%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.4%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.7%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.0%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.7%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.8%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.1%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.181.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.961.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
36.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.6%CMS range 37.9–55.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.8–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge36.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge23.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.5%CMS range 5.6–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.11
RN hours/ resident / day
0.49
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.80
RN hoursweekends
43.9%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured basic life support was initiated immediately, as directed in the facility policy, including Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air) when 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) were reviewed for unexpected death in the facility. This failed practice placed 35 additional residents (Residents 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, & 39), who had current physician orders to receive CPR, at serious risk for adverse outcome including death and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On [DATE] at 3:58 PM, the facility was notified of an IJ in F678. The facility removed the immediacy on [DATE] after they audited the records of all residents, audited the Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify allegations of abuse, ensure alleged abuse, neglect and/or unexpected deaths were reported, and thoroughly investigated for 8 of 9 residents (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 1) reviewed for abuse. Residents expresed fear of staff, not feeling safe, crying, nervous from the fear and not calling for assistance due to fear of being yelled at or pushed and pulled by staff. Although the facility was aware of these concerns, they were not identified, reported, or investigated as potential allegations of abuse, but were considered grievances. In addition, residents were not proteted when the facility allowed the alleged perpetrator(s) to have continued access to residents prior to determining if abuse or neglect occurred. This failure placed residents at serious risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect and a diminished quality of life. On 08/31/2023 at 3:00 PM, the facility was notified of an Immediate Jeopardy at CFR 483.12(c)(2)-(4)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 3 of 4 units (Unit B, Unit, C, & Unit D) reviewed for environment. The failure to ensure walls, flooring, and windows were in good repair left residents at risk of an unsafe environment, and a less than homelike environment.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 12/2025, the facility would maintain a safe, sanitary, orderly, and comfortable homelike environment.<Unit B> Observation on 01/06/2026 at 10:09 AM showed gouges on the wall at the head of bed 1 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on 01/06/2026 at 9:02 AM showed the entrance tiles were broken and the baseboards were dirty and broken in room [ROOM NUMBER]. <Unit C> Observation on 01/06/2026 at 10:21 AM showed white paint patches on the wall behind the head of bed 2 in Room . Observation on 01/06/2026 at 11:00 AM showed some of the window blind slats were bent and missing in room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promoted dignity for 2 (Residents 11 & 2) of 18 sample residents. The failure to provide privacy during assessment and treatment placed residents at risk for feelings of diminished self-worth and embarrassment. Findings included . <Facility Policy>Review of the facility's revised 12/2025 Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy showed the facility would treat each resident with respect and dignity. The policy showed all staff members would speak respectfully to residents and avoid discussions about residents that could be overheard by others. Staff involved in providing care would provide do so in a manner that promoted and maintained resident privacy and dignity.<Treatment in a Dignified Manner> <Resident 11> According to the 10/29/2025 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 11 had multiple medical conditions including stroke (a medical condition occurring when blood flow to the part of the brain was interrupted) with left side weakness, pain, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure person-centered Care Plans (CPs) were revised as needed to address all aspects of resident care for 4 of 18 residents (Residents 4, 5, 6, & 7) reviewed for comprehensive CPs. These failures placed residents at risk for inconsistent and/or inadequate care and treatment and a diminished quality of care.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 12/20/2025, the facility would ensure care and treatments provided to residents would be included in the CP.<Resident 4> According to the 11/24/2025 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 4 had clear speech and was able to make themselves understood. Resident 4 had multiple medically complex conditions including heart problems and high blood sugar. The MDS showed Resident 4 received blood thinner medications during the assessment period. Observations on 01/06/2026 at 1:41 PM, on 01/07/2026 at 10:46 AM, 01/08/2026 at 9:22 AM, and on 01/12/2026 at 8:11 AM showed Resident 4 had multiple,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's skin was assessed, monitored, and treated as required for 1 (Resident 4) of 1 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin and 1 (Resident 6) supplemental resident. These failures placed residents at risk for new or worsening skin impairment, infection, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included.<Resident 4> According to the 11/24/2025 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 4 did not have cognitive impairment and was understood and able to understand others in conversation. The MDS showed Resident 4 received blood thinner medications during the assessment period and did not have any skin problems. Observations on 01/06/2026 at 1:41 PM, on 01/07/2026 at 10:46 AM, on 01/08/2026 at 9:22 AM, and on 01/12/2026 at 8:11 AM showed Resident 4 had multiple scattered purple-colored bruises on their left arm. Review of Resident 4's January 2026 physician orders showed there were no orders directing staff to monitor the bruises on the resident's left arm. The orders included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing assessment, documentation, and prevention interventions consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 5 & 2) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU). Failure to assess and monitor PUs and implement preventative measures including repositioning placed residents at risk for deterioration in their skin condition.Findings included.<Facility Policy>Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 12/2025, showed the facility was committed to the prevention of avoidable PU, unless clinically unavoidable and to provide treatment and services to heal the PU, and prevent infection and the development of additional PU's. The policy showed the facility established a systemic approach for PU prevention and management, including prompt assessment and treatment, stabilizing interventions, reducing underlying risk factors, monitoring the effectiveness of interventions, and modifying the interventions as appropriate.<Resident 5> According to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 5 & 11) of 5 sample residents reviewed for Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) received the services as they were assessed to require. These failures placed residents at risk for further decline in Range of Motion (ROM), a reduction in mobility, increased dependence on staff, and decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to a facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Programs, revised 12/2025, the facility would provide maintenance and restorative services to maintain and improve residents' abilities to the highest practicable level. The policy showed residents identified during the comprehensive assessment process would receive restorative services included ROM, splint/brace services, and walking from restorative aides. The policy showed residents would receive RNP services upon admission or upon discharge from therapy. The Restorative Nurse was responsible for ensuring all elements of each resident's program were implemented.<Resident 5>According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sharps and chemicals were stored safely for 1 of 1 Maintenance Offices and 1 of 2 Nurses station's (West Nurse's Station) reviewed. This failure to ensure sharps and chemicals were secured placed residents at risk of injury, an unsafe environment, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Environmental Services Safety Procedures, dated 12/2025, the facility would ensure general safety procedures were followed. The policy showed staff would ensure chemicals and unsafe equipment would not be left unattended and would be stored in a locking cabinet or storage area for resident safety.<Maintenance Office> Observation on 01/06/2026 at 11:51 AM showed the maintenance door propped open without staff inside. Observation inside of the unlocked maintenance office showed chemicals, sharp tools, and objects. In an interview on 01/06/2026 at 11:54 AM, Staff C (Maintenance Supervisor) stated they expected staff to lock the door upon exited the maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications in 2 of 4 medication carts (Medication Cart A & C) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, ineffective treatment, accidental ingestion of medication, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 08/2024, the facility would ensure all medications would be stored in locked compartments or rooms. The policy showed that medications would be destroyed upon expiration.<Medication Cart A>Observation on 01/06/2026 at 12:30 PM showed Medication Cart A unlocked and unattended.In an interview on 01/06/2026 at 12:31 PM Staff E (Registered Nurse) stated they were expected to lock the medication cart before leaving it unattended but forgot to. Staff E stated they should lock the medication cart before walking away for resident safety.In an interview on 01/13/2026 at 8:30 AM Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated they expected staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards of safety. The failure to ensure foods stored in the facility's main kitchen and [NAME] Unit fridges were labeled, covered, dated, and/or disposed of upon expiration placed residents at risk of ingesting expired and/or contaminated foods and the development of food-borne illness.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's Food Safety Requirements policy, revised 12/2025, food requiring refrigeration would be labeled, dated, and monitored to ensure the food was used by the use by date or frozen/discarded when applicable. The policy showed refrigerated food would be covered or in tight containers.<Main Kitchen Refrigerator>Observation on 01/06/2025 at 8:36 AM showed the walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen contained a tray with 11 house made Jello cups. The Jello cups were uncovered and undated. In an interview on 01/06/2026 at 8:51 AM, Staff H (Dietary Supervisor) confirmed the Jello should be covered.<West Nursing Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of resident records was maintained for 1 of 4 units (Unit A) and services provided were appropriately documented in resident records for 1 of 18 residents (Resident 17) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for a violation of their rights to privacy and their right to receive care and services as ordered.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Personal and Medical records, dated 12/2025, the facility would ensure all resident information was secured and confidentiality was maintained. The policy showed papers with resident information would not be left unattended.<Unit A> Observation on 01/06/2026 at 12:30 PM showed the Unit A medication cart with a paper that had resident health information on it unsecured and in view for all. In an interview on 01/06/2026 at 12:31 PM Staff E (Registered Nurse) stated they were expected to cover and secure the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable barriers such as gloves, eyewear, and gowns used to prevent exposure to infectious materials) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for Infection Control; and ensure visitors used gloves while pouring ice from a communal ice bucket to avoid cross contamination. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for exposure to and development of contagious, communicable infectious diseases.Findings included . <Facility Policy>Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, revised 04/23/2025, showed the facility established and maintained an infection control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to all residents and staff to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases. The policy showed the facility would ensure healthcare personnel were educated and trained regarding the appropriate use of PPE prior to caring for a resident on isolation precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify 5 (Resident 1, 6, 25, 219, & 119) of 23 residents reviewed, who were Medicaid recipients, when their personal fund account balances reached $1800 (i.e. within $200 of the $2,000 resource limit beneficiaries could possess, without their Medicaid coverage being impacted). This failure placed residents at risk for personal financial liability for their care. The facility failed to ensure funds were reimbursed to the state Office of Financial Recovery (OFR), within 30 days of resident discharge or death, for 1 (Resident 219) of 3 discharged residents reviewed. This failure caused a delay in reconciling resident accounts within 30 days as required. Findings included . Review of a revised 08/2024 Resident Personal Funds policy, showed the facility must notify each resident who received Medicaid benefits: when the amount in the resident's account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person; and if the amount in the account reached the SSI resource limit, the resident may lose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure walls in resident rooms were maintained in a homelike condition for 9 of 18 rooms sampled (Rooms 22, 26, 32, 34, 50, 42, 47, 48, & 49). The failure to ensure rooms were free from gouges (Rooms 22, 32, 50, 48), resident televisions were mounted (room [ROOM NUMBER]), fans in resident rooms were clean (room [ROOM NUMBER]), and sinks, toilets, and bathroom fixtures in resident rooms were free from rust and maintained in clean, sanitary conditions (Rooms 22, 32, 34, 42, 47, & 49). These failures left residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a less than homelike environment. Findings included . <room [ROOM NUMBER]> Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 09/10/2024 at 10:46 AM showed wall behind the bed nearest the door was gouged where the bed rubbed against the wall, exposing drywall. The bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] had considerable dark yellow stains on the tile underneath and around the toilet. In an interview on 09/16/2024 at 9:18 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 laundry room and failed to ensure resident rooms were free of fall hazards for 1 of 3 (Resident 11) residents reviewed for falls. These failures placed residents at risk for elopement, ingestion of chemicals, and falls. Findings included . <Laundry Room Door> Observation on 09/10/2024 at 1:43 PM showed the door to the facility's laundry room was unlocked. The key code to unlock the door did not function. The door opened freely and allowed access to the laundry room. Observation on 09/11/2024 at 8:30 AM showed the laundry room door remained unlocked, entered the laundry room and a middle door was open. Inside the laundry room was a cart containing laundry detergent and other chemicals. The exterior door opening to the rear of the building was propped open and a large fan was placed in the doorway. There was nothing preventing a wandering resident from passing through the laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored, labeled, dated when opened, and discarded when expired for 1 of 2 medication carts (Garden Wing Cart), 1 of 1 medication rooms (West Hall Medication Room Refrigerator), and for 1 of 19 residents (Resident 60) observed. The facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 medication carts were locked when left unsupervised by staff. The failure to ensure medication refrigerators were double locked, medications were discarded when expired, eye drop medications were dated upon opening, medication carts were locked, and medications were not left at bedside, placed residents at risk for ineffective treatment, expired medications, and contaminated medications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Medication Storage, revised 08/2024, the facility would secure narcotics and controlled substances under double lock and key. The policy showed medication rooms and carts would be inspected routinely for discontinued and outdated medications. The policy showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 facility kitchens and for one unit refrigerator reviewed for food services. The failure to clean the facility's kitchen ice machine, cover food during transport, perform hand hygiene between glove use, and maintain sanitary unit refrigerators placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised August 2024 Food Safety Requirements policy, the facility would store, prepare, distribute and serve resident meals in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The policy showed to prevent foodborne illness, dietary staff should clean and sanitize the internal components of the ice machines according to manufacturer's guidelines. The facility's revised July 2024 Ice Machines and Ice Storage Chest policy, ice machines and ice storage/distribution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure informed consent (a process explaining the risks and benefits of a treatment prior to use) was obtained prior to administration of psychotropic (affecting mental state) medications for 2 of 5 (Residents 20 & 34) reviewed for unnecessary medications and for bed rails for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 60) reviewed for accident hazards. This placed residents at risk for unwanted treatment. <Findings included> <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, revised 08/2024, residents needing psychotropic medications would be educated on the risks and benefits. <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, revised 03/2024, showed the facility would obtain informed consent from the resident or resident representative prior to installation and use of the bed rails. The policy showed risks and benefits of bed rail use for the resident would be provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (SNF-NOMNC - a required form notifying the resident that their skilled services coverage was ending and would no longer be covered by their Medicare A benefits) as required for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 219 and 119) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This failure placed Residents 219, 119, and other residents at risk for not being fully informed and losing their right to an appeals process. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy titled, SNF Beneficiary Notices Under Medicare Part A, revised 06/2023, the facility would inform Medicare A beneficiaries when they no longer met the skilled coverage criteria. The policy showed a NOMNC was given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of their Medicare covered Part A stay because the notice contained information regarding the beneficiary's right to an expedited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS -an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status for 3 (Resident 37, 51, & 61) of 19 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 37> Review of a 07/24/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 37 had clear speech, understands, and was understood by others. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 37 with broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture, no natural teeth or tooth fragments, (obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth, and mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. Observations on 09/10/2024 at 10:38 AM showed Resident 37 with multiple lower teeth and no upper denture in their mouth. In an interview at this time, Resident 37 stated they were waiting to have their dentures fixed. In an interview on 09/16/2024 at 1:35 PM, Staff BB (MDS Coordinator, Registered Nurse) reviewed Resident 37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the residents' mental health conditions for 1 of 5 (Resident 51) residents reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy titled, Admissions Criteria, revised July 2024, all new admission and readmissions must go through a PASRR screening prior to admission. The policy showed the facility's social worker was responsible for making referrals for Level II PASRR services. <Resident 51> According to a 06/26/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 51 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and schizophrenia (a chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 58> According to the 07/30/2024 Quarterly MDS Resident 58 had diagnoses including a history of stroke and difficulty swallowing. The MDS showed Resident 58 received over half their daily calorie intake via a feeding tube (tubing that allows liquid nutrition to pass directly into the stomach for people with swallowing difficulties). According to the revised 05/13/2024 resident requires tube feeding . CP Resident 58 still received nutrition by feeding tube. Review of the physician's orders showed a 05/23/2024 order for a bolus (using gravity rather than a pump) feeding four times a day for Resident 34. This order was discontinued on 07/04/2024. In an interview on 09/16/2024 at 11:02 AM Staff AA (Dietician) stated Resident 20 successfully graduated from the tube feeding and was now able to meet their nutritional needs with oral intake. Staff AA stated the CP was no longer necessary. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide nursing care within professional standards. The failure to follow physician's orders for 2 of 19 sample residents reviewed (Residents 34 & 20), clarify physician's orders when required, and sign for physician orders not completed for 2 of 19 sample residents (Residents 25 & 52) placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, medication errors, and ineffective treatment. Findings included . According to the facility's Medication Administration policy revised 08/2024, staff would correct any medication discrepancies and report to the nurse manager. <Following Orders> <Resident 34> According to the 07/24/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 34 had occasional pain that almost constantly affected their sleep and day-to-day activities. The MDS showed Resident 34 took opioid medications as needed. Review of the June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed a 06/07/2024 physician's order for an as needed opioid pain medication 5-325 Milligram (MG), give one pill every 12 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided for dependent residents for 3 (Residents 52, 60, & 1) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs and one supplementary resident (Resident 58). Facility failure to provide ADL assistance as needed placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and feelings of diminished self-worth. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's reviewed 08/2024 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy showed, ADLs included bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, transfers, toileting, and assistance with eating. The policy showed residents assessed to be unable to complete ADLs independently should receive the assistance they required. <Resident 58> According to the 07/30/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 58 had diagnoses including a history of stroke, heart failure, one-side partial paralysis, lack of coordination, and an abnormal posture. The MDS showed Resident 58…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain residents' highest practicable level of well-being for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1 & 7) reviewed for hospice care. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary end- of- life care and services, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Providing End of Life Care policy revised 08/2024, the facility would utilize a systematic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of end-of-life care. The policy stated the facility and resident/family would coordinate the resident's Care Plan (CP) and implement interventions in accordance with the comprehensive assessment for the resident's needs, goals, and preferences. If the resident chose hospice services, the CP would specify the care and services to be provided by the facility and by hospice services. The facility would maintain communication with the resident, resident representative, and hospice services as it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a restorative program was provided for 1 of 2 (Resident 37) sample residents identified by staff with mobility limitations and reviewed for Range of Motion (ROM). These failures placed residents at risk for declines in ROM, reduction in mobility, increased dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a revised July 2024 facility, Restorative Nursing Services policy, residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. The policy showed restorative nursing services included splinting and bracing. The policy showed recommendations for restorative nursing services would be made at the time of discharge from therapy as needed and communicated to the aide responsible either by the discharging therapist or nurse overseeing the restorative program. <Resident 37> According to a 07/24/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 37 had multiple medically complex diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure weights were adequately monitored for 1 of 1 (Resident 58) residents reviewed for hydration/weights. The failure to monitor weights as ordered placed residents at risk for weight loss, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's August 2024 Weight Monitoring policy, a weight monitoring schedule should be developed for all residents at the time of admission. The policy showed resident weights would be collected monthly or more frequently, as needed. <Resident 58> According to the 07/30/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 58 needed supervision with eating and had diagnoses including a history of stroke, one-sided partial paralysis, and swallowing difficulties. The MDS showed Resident 58 received over half their calories via feeding tube (tubing allowing liquid nutrition to flow directly to the stomach avoiding the esophagus). Observation on 09/10/2024 at 12:38 PM showed two nursing aides assist Resident 58 to sit up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 2 (Residents 52 & 37) of 5 residents reviewed for dental services. This failure placed residents at risk for oral discomfort and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Dental Services policy, revised 08/2024, oral and denture care would be provided in accordance with identified needs and as specified in the resident's Care Plan (CP). The facility would assist residents with making dental appointments and arranging transportation when necessary. <Resident 52> According to the 07/17/2024 Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 52 was understood and could understand others in conversation. The MDS showed Resident 52 had intact mental processing abilities. The MDS showed Resident 52 had mouth/facial pain and discomfort when chewing. Resident 52 was dependent on staff for cleaning and putting in their dentures. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices that provided a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to 1) ensure staff used personal protective equipment for residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP); 2) perform hand hygiene during resident care and during dining service; and 3) provide catheter care with professional standards. These failures placed residents at risk for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and related complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Infection Control Policy and Practices policy dated March 2023, the facility would prevent, detect, investigate and control infections by maintaining a safe and sanitary environment, and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. The policy stated the facility would manage transmission of diseases and infections by implementation of isolation precautions for standard and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship Program, to promote appropriate use of ABO's, reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use, and decrease the development of an ABO resistance for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 223, 224, & 38) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of ABO's. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, ABO Stewardship Program, dated 06/17/2024, ABOs would be prescribed and administered to the residents under the guidance of the facility's ABO Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The policy showed appropriate indications for use of ABO's included meeting the Loeb minimum Criteria for clinical definition of active infection. This policy stated when a Culture and Sensitivity (C&S - a test to identify a specific type of bacteria and determine which ABO's will treat the infection best) was ordered, the results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the level of supervision necessary to prevent accidents for resident-to-resident altercations for 2 (Residents 1, 2) of 5 residents reviewed for supervision and accidents. The facility failed to provide supervision and placed residents at risk for potential verbal and physical abuse, serious injury, pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised 07/2017, showed the facility would strive to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible and resident safety, supervision, and assistance to prevent accidents were facility wide priorities. The policy showed resident supervision was a core component of the systems approach to safety, the type and frequency of supervision was determined by the individual resident's assessed needs. The policy showed interventions would be developed to reduce the individuals risks related to hazards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an in-service training program that ensured 3 of 3 Nursing Assistants (Staff's L, M, & N) reviewed for training and competency, had the required 12 hours per year of in-service training and education. This failure placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . Review of the Facility Assessment, revised [DATE], showed required in-service training for nurse aides must be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aids and must be no less than 12 hours per year, including dementia (a memory impairment) management training. Additional staff training identified included communication training, resident rights and facility responsibilities, cultural competency, identification of resident changes in condition, including how to determine if symptoms represent problems in need of intervention. On [DATE] at 2:27 PM, an Automated External Defibrillator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form indicating the resident's wishes when found not breathing and without a pulse) to initiate Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air/Full Code) or not during medical emergency for 2 of 8 residents (Residents 3 & 4) reviewed for Advance Directives. The failure to ensure a copy of the POLST form was available in the medical records and accessible to staff (Resident 3) and to fully complete the POLST form (Resident 4) placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their stated preferences/decisions honored regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care, not receiving CPR when indicated, and potentially death. Findings included . <Resident 3> According to the [DATE] Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 3 had medical conditions including unstable blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents 1, 3, 4 & 5 ) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Facility staff failed to adequately monitor the effectiveness of medications ordered to treat insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Failure of the facility placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary medications and/or experience adverse side effects. Findings included . According to the facility Use of Psychotropic Medication Policy revised 12/22, residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication. Residents who use psychotropic drugs shall receive non-pharmacological interventions to facilitate reduction or discontinuation of the psychotropic drugs. For new admissions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed conduct thorough investigations and implement preventative measures to ensure the safety of 2 (Resident 1 & 2) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Failure of the facility placed residents at risk of injury. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the 01/06/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact, was able to walk ten feet with partial-moderate assistance, walk 50 feet with substantial - maximal assistance, and the Resident's ability to get on and off a toilet or commode was noted as not applicable. According to this MDS the resident had a history of falls prior to admission, but no falls since admission on [DATE]. Review of the Care Area Assessments (CAA), showed the resident required moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), was occasionally incontinent of urine and required moderate assisting with toileting and was a high risk for falls related to a history of falls,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals that accommodated resident food allergies and preferences for 2 (Resident 1 & 6) of 4 residents reviewed for food allergies/preferences. This failure placed the resident at risk for allergic reaction, dissatisfaction with food, weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the Hospital History and Physical dated 12/15/2023 and printed 12/28/2023, showed Resident 1 was allergic to shellfish containing products and exhibited the allergic reaction of anaphylaxis ( a serious life-threatening allergic reaction which usually occurs within few seconds or minutes of exposure, involving hives, swelling and sudden drop in the blood pressure.) Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The diet order entered into the electronic medical record was a CCHO (consistent, constant, controlled carbohydrate), Diabetic, No Added Salt diet. It did not include additional directions. Review of the Dietary Profile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to schedule sufficient staff to provide care and services to ensure resident's needs were met on one of three shifts (night shift) reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed resident's at risk for unmet care needs, accidents/injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Facility Assessment (FA) revised April 2023, showed 55 residents required 1-2 person assist with transfers, 13 residents were dependant on staff for transfers, 69 residents required 1-2 person assist with toileting, and three residents were dependent on staff to meet toileting needs. According to the FA the facility assessed the facility to require four nursing assistants on night shift for a census of 85. Review of lists provided by the facility on 09/01/2023 showed the facility had 23 residents that were assessed to require two-person assistance with mobility (16 in the back hall and seven in the front hall), and nine residents who were identified as Care in Pairs (six in the back hall and three in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that used its resources effectively and efficiently so residents could attain or maintain their highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and to ensure the facility maintained substantial compliance with state and federal regulations. The Administration failed to provide administrative oversight and monitoring of facility personnel, systems, practices, and policies related to Abuse/Neglect; to provide sufficiently trained and supervised nursing staff to meet resident needs; and failed to ensure staff were trained on facility identified training and required mandatory training, including, but not limited to Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. These failures placed all 79 residents of the facility at risk for harm related to potential ongoing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . On 08/31/2023 at 3:00 PM, the facility was notified of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at CFR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fall prevention strategies were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk for falls with injury. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 05/24/2023, Resident 1 was assessed to require two person extensive assistance with mobility. Review of the at risk for falls CP revised 05/08/2023 showed Resident 1 was at risk for falls. Interventions listed included, bed in lowest position, against the wall left side, fall mat on right side and bilateral quarter rails to assist with mobility. Review of a Written Notice of Room Change dated 05/24/2023 showed Resident 1 was moved on 05/23/2023 to a room in the front hall. The room move was deemed as medically necessary as the resident was needing one on one [1:1 care]. Review of a 07/17/2023 Provider Note showed Resident 1 was a high fall risk with frequent falls and poor safety awareness. According to the documentation the resident was asleep in bed with aid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consider and act promptly to address concerns raised by residents at the Resident Council. Facility failure to ensure resident concerns were considered, acted upon, or a rationale provided for why action could not be taken left residents at risk for frustration, and a less-than-homelike environment. Findings included . Review of the minutes from the facility's 02/28/2023 Resident Council meeting under the header Maintenance showed residents asked when the facility's patio would be cleaned up. The minutes indicated residents wanted to have the patio available as Spring approached. The 03/31/2023 Resident Council meeting minutes included no discussion of past concerns, including the availability and cleanliness of the patio area. Under the header Maintenance residents again asked when the patio would be cleaned up. The 04/25/2023 Resident Council Meeting minutes included no discussion of past concerns, including the prior patio concerns. Under the header of Maintenance the minutes showed Residents would REALLY…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment on 2 of 4 units, 1 of 1 therapy gyms, 1 of 1 dining/activity rooms, and 1 of 1 patio areas. Facility failure to maintain a home with adequate space for residents to congregate freely and comfortably outside their rooms, and maintain resident rooms and halls in a safe and homelike environment, left residents at risk for an unsafe and less-than-homelike environment. Findings included . <Patio> Observation of the patio area accessed directly from the dining/activity room on 05/19/2023 at 2:08 PM showed the patio was used to store furniture and other equipment. Six dining room tables (some stacked on top of one another, others lying on their side with the table legs sticking out horizontally), seven dining chairs (positioned in a way that prevented anyone from sitting on them), two gas grills, an air conditioning unit, and an old whirlpool tub were observed in the covered area, minimizing the space…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 67> According to the 02/23/2023 Quarterly MDS Resident 67 had medically complex diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disease that can cause delirium, lethargy, and dementia) and history of stroke. The MDS showed Resident 67 required extensive assistance with eating and a mechanically altered diet (the resident's food and/or drinks needed to be altered in order to allow the resident to safely swallow). According to an 04/12/2023 progress note, Resident 67 choked while eating green beans and their diet texture was downgraded to an easier to chew and swallow texture. A 04/20/2023 progress note showed Resident 67 had a new order for an antibiotic medication to treat aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection caused by inhaled food particles). Another 04/21/2023 progress note showed Resident 67 was transported to hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 05/23/2023 at 10:42 AM, Staff D (RCM) acknowledged there was no documentation to support the resident or resident's representative was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were updated and implemented for 10 of 18 sample residents (Residents 67, 4, 5, 20, 70, 63, 73, 25, 45 & 42). These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 67> According to the 02/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident had diagnoses including a history of stroke and difficulty swallowing. The MDS showed Resident 67 required extensive assistance with eating and had an altered-texture diet (to assist with swallowing/prevent choking). Review of the Physician's Orders (POs) showed Resident 67 had an order for pureed texture food and nectar-thick fluids. The POs did not include an order stating Nothing by mouth or any other orders restricting Resident 67's dietary intake. The 12/16/2022 resident has a nutritional problem . CP included a 05/04/2023 intervention stating NPO (nothing by mouth) was recommended related to Resident 67's swallowing difficulties. Resident 67's Kardex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance to dependent residents for 8 of 9 residents (Residents 4, 5, 63, 73, 25, 45, 42, & 11) reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide ADL assistance as needed placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, and feelings of diminished self-worth. Findings included . <Resident 4> According to the 03/16/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 4 was assessed with moderate difficulty with decision-making, and diagnoses including heart failure. The MDS showed Resident 4 required assistance to bathe, and showed the choice between a tub bath, shower, bed bath and sponge bath was very important for the resident. On 05/17/2023 at 9:08 AM Resident 4 was observed lying in bed with greasy hair. On 05/19/2023 at 8:27 AM, Resident 4's hair was again observed to be greasy. The 03/24/2023 ADL self-care performance deficit . Care Plan (CP) included interventions for facility staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to consistently perform hand hygiene before and after resident care/contact and staff failed to ensure equipment was cleaned and disinfected after each use and between resident use. These failures placed the residents and staff at risk for development of contagious, communicable infections and disease. Findings included . Hand Hygiene The 03/2023 facility policy titled Hand Hygiene directed staff to perform hand hygiene in the following situations: before and after direct resident contact, between resident contact, before and after handling foods and assisting residents with meals, before and after assisting residents with personal care, when taking a pulse or blood pressure, after removing gloves, and before/after handling clean or soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor preferences for bathing for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for choices for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) (Residents 85 & 10). The facility's failure to accommodate resident choices regarding bathing preferences placed residents at risk for a frustration, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 85> According to the 05/07/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 85 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 85 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment and totally dependent on staff for bathing. The MDS showed the choice between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath was very important for Resident 85. The 05/10/2023 resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit . Care Plan (CP) showed staff should provide a sponge bath when a full bath or shower could not be tolerated. The CP showed Resident 85 was scheduled for bathing on Tuesdays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify 7 (Resident 13, 51, 47, 28, 1, 42, & 55) of 25 residents reviewed, who were Medicaid recipients, when their personal fund account balances reached $1800 (i.e. within $200 of the $2,000 resource limit beneficiaries could possess, without their Medicaid coverage being impacted). This failure placed residents at risk for personal financial liability for their care. The facility failed to ensure funds were reimbursed to the state Office of Financial Recovery (OFR), within 30 days of resident discharge or death, for 1 (Resident 339) of 6 discharged residents reviewed. This failure caused delay in reconciling resident accounts within 30 days as required. Findings included . Review of a revised 12/01/2022 Resident Personal Funds policy, showed the facility must notify each resident who received Medicaid benefits: when the amount in the resident's account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person; and if the amount in the account reached the SSI resource limit, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 25 residents who had a Trust Account with the facility had their funds covered by a surety bond. This failure placed residents at risk to be unable to recover their money in the event of loss of funds from their account. Findings included . According to a revised 12/01/2022 facility Resident Personal Funds policy the facility would purchase a surety bond to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. Record review of the facility's Trial Balance report showed 25 residents had funds in trust accounts. The trust account report showed a current balance of $33,112.29 as of 05/22/2023. Review of the facility's surety bond, dated 05/09/2018, showed the bond amount covered a trust account balance not to exceed $28,000. In an interview on 05/22/2023 at 10:30 AM, Staff S (Business Office Manager), stated the surety bond should be more than the total amount in the trust accounts. Staff S confirmed the facility's surety bond did not cover the current facility trust account balance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directives (ADs - legal documents reflecting resident wishes for end-of-life care) were available in the resident record for 5 of 12 sample residents (Residents 5, 4, 3, 10 & 46) reviewed for ADs. These failures placed residents at risk for unnecessary care, and their end-of-life wishes not being honored. Findings included . <admission Packet> The facility's undated admission Packet showed residents had the legal right to make their own healthcare decisions including the right to determine in advance which life-sustaining treatments they wanted, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These healthcare decisions could be provided in written form, as an AD. The packet instructed residents to provide the facility with their signed AD documentation if they had any. <Resident 5> According to the [DATE] admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 5 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who experienced a significant change in health status were comprehensively assessed using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. The facility failed to: (1) complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) for 1 of 1 (Resident 338) residents, and (2) timely complete the Significant Change MDS for 1 of 1 (Resident 67) residents reviewed for hospice (supportive care focusing on comfort and quality of life) services. Failure to identify the need for a Significant Change MDS and timely complete the assessment placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, delayed care planning, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <RAI process> The October 2019 RAI Manual (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) indicated a Significant Change MDS assessment was required when: (1) a resident experienced a decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 6 (Residents 20, 55, 63, 45, 42, & 10) of 18 residents Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) were completed accurately to reflect the resident's condition. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . <Resident 20> According to a 03/28/2023 Quarterly MDS, Resident 20 was cognitively intact with clear speech, was understood, and able to understand others. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 20 with no broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. In an interview on 05/16/2023 at 11:53 AM, Resident 20 stated their dentures needed to be adjusted and stated staff were aware the dentures were too loose. Review of a 03/16/2023 progress note showed staff documented Resident 20 was on the dentist list for loose dentures. In an interview on 05/24/2023 at 10:18 AM, Staff K (MDS Coordinator) stated based on the 03/16/2023 progress note, loosely fitting dentures should have been, but was not captured on the 03/28/2023 Quarterly MDS. <Resident 55>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 comprehensive evaluations (the process to determine what types of mental health services are required after a Level 1 PASRR determined services were necessary) were obtained and/or implemented and incorporated into the Care Plan (CP) for 1 of 6 (Residents 55) residents whose PASRRs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . <Resident 55> According to a 04/17/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) Resident 55 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including depression and Schizophrenia (a mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally). Review of an undated Level 1 PASRR (Level 1 - the process to determine if mental health services are required) completed by facility staff identified Resident 55 with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) indictors and required a Level 2 evaluation referral. A review of a 12/14/2021 Notice of Determination form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 3 of 18 residents (Residents 4, 20 & 70) whose CPs were reviewed. Facility failure to develop individualized, comprehensive CPs left residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 4> According to the 03/16/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 4 was assessed to have moderate difficulty with decicion making. The MDS showed Resident 4 required extensive assistance with toileting. Resident 4's Physician's Orders (POs) included a 03/27/2023 PO for a laxative powder 17 grams by mouth as needed for constipation. Review of Resident 4's comprehensive CP showed no CP developed to address Resident 4's constipation and related laxative use. In an interview on 05/23/2023 Staff D (Resident Care Manager - RCM) stated Resident 4 used a laxative powder. Staff D stated it was important for all care required by a resident to be care planned, and Resident 4's laxative use/constipation were not. <Resident 20> According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: follow Physician's Orders (POs) for 4 of 22 sample residents (Residents 73, 63, 44 & 41); clarify POs (Residents 67 & 70); sign only for tasks performed (Resident 20). These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, medication and treatment errors, and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Following POs> <Resident 73> According to a 02/18/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 73 had multiple complex diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and required the use of oxygen therapy. Review of Resident 73's May 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed the resident had a PO for oxygen to be given at 2 Liters Per Minute (lpm) when in use. Observations on 05/16/2023 at 8:33 AM, 05/17/2023 at 9:07 AM, and 05/24/2023 at 8:29 AM showed Resident 73's oxygen was set to 1.5 lpm. In an interview on 05/24/2023 at 8:33 AM, Staff U (Resident Care Manager - RCM), confirmed Resident 73's order for oxygen was to be at 2 lpm. Staff U read the PO and raised the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 4, 73, 63, & 42) reviewed for Activities. The failure to provide meaningful activities left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 4> According to the 03/16/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 4 was assessed with moderate difficulty making decisions and required extensive assistance with transfers. The MDS showed it was very important for Resident 4 to participate in their favorite activities, and somewhat important for the resident to do things with groups of people. The 04/04/2023 resident is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs Care Plan (CP) included the following interventions: ensure Resident 4 attended activities that were compatible with their physical and mental capabilities; invite the resident to scheduled activities; provide bedside/in-room activities if Resident 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistive devices and/or proper treatment to maintain hearing for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 20) reviewed for hearing. This failure placed the resident at risk for frustration, decline in the ability to hear, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a revised 12/2022 facility Hearing and Vision Services policy showed the facility would ensure all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. This policy stated once vision or hearing services were identified, the social worker/social service designee would assist the resident by making appointments and arranging for transportation. <Resident 20> According to a 04/26/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 20 did not have a memory impairment and was able to understand, and be understood by others. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 20 with adequate hearing with no hearing aid. On a previous 03/28/2023 Quarterly MDS, staff assessed Resident 20 with minimal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Care Plans (CP) with interventions todevelop new skin issues and to promote wound healing for 1 (Resident 25) of 2 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU). Failure to follow the CP such as positioning resident in bed, getting the resident out of bed, and provide pressure relieving devices placed residents at risk for deterioration in skin condition. Findings included . According to the 04/2023 revised Pressure Injury Prevention and Management facility policy, residents determined as at risk for developing pressure injuries would have interventions documented in the CP based on specific factors identified in the risk assessment. Evidence based interventions for wound prevention would be implemented for the residents at risk and with PUs would include repositioning, floating heels, providing pressure redistributing non-irritating surfaces, and maintaining nutrition and hydration status. According to this policy, interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 (Residents 59 & 2) residents reviewed for Restorative Nursing Services received the services as they were assessed to require. These failures placed residents at risk for decline in Range of Motion (ROM - move a joint in different directions), dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 59> According to the 02/26/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 59 was assessed as never understood in conversation, and had diagnoses including anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by lack of oxygen to brain), right and left wrist contracture (tightening of the muscles and tissues that causes the joints become very stiff), right and left elbow contractures, and a left hip contracture. This assessment showed Resident 59 required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. This assessment showed the resident had both upper and lower extremity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents 77, 63, & 41) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Facility staff failed to adequately monitor behaviors and adverse side effects of psychotropic medications, and failed to individualize target behaviors. These failures placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary medications and/or experience adverse side effects. <Resident 77> Review of a 04/21/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 77 had diagnoses of memory impairment and an anxiety disorder. This assessment showed Resident 77 received a psychotropic medication daily, during the assessment period. According to this MDS, Resident 77 did not have any physical or verbal behavioral symptoms. Resident 77 did not refuse care during the assessment period. In an observation on 05/17/2023 at 2:30 PM, Resident 77 was in in their wheelchair in the dining room, during a resident activity. Resident 77 was asleep. In an observation on 05/18/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were dated when opened, and expired medications and biologicals were disposed of timely for 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications or experiencing medication errors. Findings included . Review of a 01/2023 facility Medication Storage policy showed medications and biologicals would be stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. This policy directed staff to note the date on the label for diabetic medication vials and pens when first used. Outdated or discontinued medications, and those in containers without secure closures would be immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. <Medication Storage and Labeling> <Wild [NAME] Medication Cart> Observation of the Wild [NAME] medication cart on 05/16/2023 at 12:26 PM, with Staff T (Licensed Practical Nurse)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 2 (Resident 20 & 70) of 6 sample residents and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 55) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet dental needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A revised 12/2022 facility Dental Services policy stated the facility would, if necessary or requested, assist the resident with making dental appointments and arranging transportation to and from the dental services location. All actions and information regarding dental services, including any delays related to obtaining dental services, would be documented in the resident's medical records. <Resident 20> According to a 03/28/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 20 was able to make their own decisions, had clear speech, was understood, and able to understand others. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 20 with no broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. In an interview on 05/16/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 (Resident 38) residents reviewed for altered texture diet received food in the texture prescribed by a physician, and as assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment and care. Failure to ensure Resident 38 received the correct diet texture as ordered placed residents at risk for aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident), choking, and other serious medical complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The 12/2022 Therapeutic Diet Orders facility policy defined a mechanically altered diet as one in which the texture or consistency of food were altered to facilitate oral intake. The policy outlined the responsibility of both dietary and nursing staff to provide therapeutic diets in the prescribed form and/or nutritive content. <Resident 38> According to the 05/03/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 38 had multiple medical diagnoses including a condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Facility staff failed to: (1) conduct proper testing of sanitizing bucket solutions, (2) use hair covering in food preparation areas, (3) use disposable gloves for food handling during tray line service, (4) thoroughly clean and sanitize the food thermometer before use, and (5) prepare Resident 67's beverage according to the prescribed altered liquid consistency. These failures placed residents at risk for food contamination, bare-hand contact, foodborne illnesses, aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident), and other serious medical complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The 12/2022 Maintaining a Sanitary Tray Line facility policy showed tray assembly was prioritized to ensure foods were handled safely and held at proper temperatures. The policy directed staff to wear gloves and hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as determined by the physician's order for 2 of 3 (Residents 70 & 63) residents reviewed for therapy services. This failure prevented residents from attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being. Findings included . <Resident 70> According to the 04/12/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 70 was able to understand, understood others, and had multiple diagnoses including a stroke (a brain injury), loss of function to the left side of their body, left hip contracture (tightening of the muscles and tissues that causes the joints become very stiff), and generalized muscle weakness. The MDS showed Resident 41 received skilled Physical Therapy (PT) services with a start date of 04/06/2023. In an interview on 05/16/2023 at 9:00 AM, Resident 70 stated they were not getting PT services they were supposed to. Resident 70 stated nobody had come to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$256,725 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $77,066 — penalty dated 2024-06-25
  • $179,659 — penalty dated 2023-09-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 51.7+2.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SOUTHWEST 2ND STREET CONSULTING LCCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
CHHEDA, NEELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
MILLER, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
PARKS, TESSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$214K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 12%Other / private 16%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $214K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$416per resident / day
operating cost
$12,633per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$414per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505280. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next