Alpine Breeze Health And Wellness
6124 Raytown Road, Raytown, MO 64133 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (816) 358-8222 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $35,683 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-23)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 75.7% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.1% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.2% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.4% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.1% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.7% | 26.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.9% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.57 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 6.6–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.0–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 144.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.53 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility management company failed to ensure payments were issued or issued in a timely manner, to Vendor A who provided necessary services to the residents. On [DATE] at 9:02 A.M., the running water to the facility was shut off for non-payment. The facility had received a 10-day notice of shut off for non-payment which expired on [DATE]. This affected all residents in the building. The facility census was 113 residents. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 3:56 P.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. 1. Review of a facility e-mail, dated [DATE] at 11:38 A.M. showed: -An attached 10-day notice from Vendor A was sent to the facility management Account Manager for payment. -Copied on the e-mail was the facility Administrator and Chief Financial Officer. Review of the facility 10-Day Notice dated [DATE] showed: -Attention resident the water service is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of ten sampled residents, Resident #1 was free from abuse, when on 1/27/26 at approximately 2:23 A.M. Resident #2 struck Resident #1 on the face while Resident #1 was sleeping in bed, due to an auditory hallucination. As a result of the altercation, Resident #1 sustained a laceration to the inner lip and minor swelling to his/her left eye. The facility census was 142 residents.The Administrator was notified on 2/16/26 of the past noncompliance which began on 1/27/26. The residents were separated, and Resident #2 was placed on 1:1 observation. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment and returned to the facility with no new orders. Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation and admitted . The facility immediately completed education for staff on the Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy. The deficiency was corrected on 1/27/26. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #2) was free from physical abuse out of 8 sampled residents when on 4/17/25 Resident #1 struck Resident #2 on the head with rock resulting in an approximately 3 centimeter (cm) laceration and a hospital visit. The facility census was 138 residents. The Administrator was notified on 4/23/25 of the past noncompliance which began on 4/17/25. The facility immediately completed education for staff on the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, the facility's Behavior Management police and de-escalation techniques. Resident #1 was placed on 1:1 supervision until his/her transport to the hospital on 4/18/25. Resident #2 was treated. The deficiency was corrected on 4/18/25. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, dated 8/22/22, showed: -It was the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by implementing policies and procedures that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implement effective measures to prevent resident elopement for one sampled resident (Resident #1) of 8 sampled residents who resided on the facility's secured memory care unit. On 4/29/26, the main door out of the memory care unit did not fully latch after use. As a result, the resident was able to exit the secured unit unsupervised, access the facility elevator and make his/her way out of the facility through a door where the alarm had been temporarily disabled, without staff awareness, and was later located by law enforcement at a local barbershop without injury. The facility census was 146 residents.The Administrator was notified on 5/7/26 of the past noncompliance which began on 4/29/26. The facility immediately completed education for wandering and elopement risk, alarm response and missing persons. An elopement drill with staff was completed on 4/30/26. All resident elopement assessments were updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide individualized and customized activities based on the resident's previous lifestyle (occupation, family, hobbies), preferences and comforts, failed to ensure to individualized activities for resident who are bed-bound or unable to participate in group activities for one sampled resident (Resident #118) and failed to provide cognitively appropriate activities for residents residing in the memory care unit, out of 29 sampled residents and potential affect all 27 residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census of 140 residents. Review of the facility's Activities Policy revised on 8/1/25 showed:-The facility will provide an ongoing activity program to support resident choices of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan and preference for each resident. -Activates will be designed with the intent to enhance the resident sense of well-being, belonging and usefulness by: --Promote or enhance, physical activity, cognition, emotional health, self-esteem, dignity, pleasure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain that all foods were up to date and not expired in the walk in refrigerator; keeping the walk in refrigerator floor dry, ice buildup in the walk in freezer; black hose that connects to the cooling unit was falling apart and had insulation sticking out of it; ice and food on the floor of the walk in freezer. This practice potentially affected 140 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 140 residents.Sanitation Inspection policy date implemented 9/1/21 showed:It was the policy of this facility, as part of the department's sanitation program, to conduct inspections to ensure food service area were clean, sanitary and in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:-All food service areas shall be kept clean, sanitary, free from litter, rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies and other insects.-Sanitation inspections would be conducted in the following manner:--Daily: Food service staff shall inspect refrigerators/coolers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a faucet in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] in good repair and failed to maintain the cleanout (a capped pipe that provides access to a sewer or drain line, allowing for inspection, cleaning, and maintenance of the system) cover on the 300 Hall secured tightly to the cleanout valve. This practice potentially affected 23 residents and any facility staff who worked on the 300 Hall. The facility census was 140 residents. Observation on 8/13/25 at 10:35 A.M. and 3:39 P.M., showed the cleanout cover moved when it was stepped on.During an interview on 8/13/25 at 3:39 P.M., the Facility Maintenance Director said he/he did not know the cleanout cover needed to be tightened.During a phone interview on 8/26/25 at 12:19 P.M., the Facility Maintenance Director said typically, the facility does not have issues with the cleanout covers so they do not really check them, however if a cleanout cover is reported as loose or slack, they would address it.2. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was negative airflow in required areas such as restrooms and soiled utility rooms in the following rooms: resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 311, 309, 306/307, 306/304, 305, 303, 302/300, 301, 210, 208, 102, 607, 603, 512, 511, 510, 508, 507, 506, 503, 502, 406, 407, 404, This practice potentially affected 44 residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Note: Air flow was tested by holding one piece of tissue paper to the ceiling vent. If the paper was drawn to the vent, then negative air flow was present; if the paper fell, then negative airflow was absent. 1. Observations on 8/13/25 with Maintenance Person A, showed the following:-At 3:35 P.M. there was the absence of negative air flow in the shared restroom of resident rooms 310/308.-At 3:40 P.M. there was the absence of negative airflow in the restroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER].-At 3:42 P.M. there was the absence of negative airflow in in the restroom of resident room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacist's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of two psychotropic medications for one sampled resident (Resident #6) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents.Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review and Reporting policy and procedure revised 9/2018, showed the Medication Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of the resident with the goal of promoting the positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The medication review includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The Medication review also involves collaborating with other members of the Interdisciplinary Care Team, including the resident, family/responsible party. The policy showed:-The consultant pharmacist has access…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fall investigation was completely documented and the post fall documentation was correct to show the resident's change in condition after a fall with injury for one sampled resident (Resident #6) and failed to maintain a safe transfer for one sampled resident (Resident #143), out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility Fall policy and procedure dated 9/1/21, showed each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. The policy showed: -Each resident's risk factors and environmental hazards will be evaluated when developing the resident's comprehensive plan of care. -When a resident experiences a fall, the facility will assess the resident, complete a post-fall assessment, complete an incident report, notify the physician and family, review the resident's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the catheter bag and tubing (a catheter is a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into the bladder for removing fluid. The fluid goes into a collection bag) was kept below the bladder to prevent cross contamination and infection for one sampled resident (Resident #149) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility Catheter Care policy and procedure revised 8/1/25, showed it was the facility's policy to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. The policy showed staff was to ensure the drainage bag was located below the level of the bladder to discourage backflow of urine. 1.Review of Resident #149's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including kidney disease, uropathy (any condition that impairs the normal flow of urine through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practice with the enteral tube feeding (A medical devices use to provide nutrition to residents who require to resident who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth requiring supplemental nutrition) process of changing the pump tubing every 24 hours for one sample resident (Resident #45), failed to ensure infection control practice wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - is equipment worn to minimize exposure to a variety of hazards. Examples of PPE include such items as gloves, face masks or face shields, respirators, foot and eye protection, and gowns) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status.) maintained during direct contract of a resident's with a Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (Peg-tube/Feeding Tube (TF), is a flexible tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, showed the facility failed to complete the correct procedure during tracheostomy care to include cleaning the inner canula, failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-a set of infection control practices designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. They focus on using personal protective equipment (PPE) like gowns and gloves during specific high-contact resident care activities for residents at increased risk of acquiring or known to be colonized or infected with an MDRO) upon entering the resident's room and failed to use infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during tracheostomy care for one sampled resident (Resident #15) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents.Review of the resident's Tracheostomy Care policy and procedure dated 9/1/21, showed the facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy (a surgical airway management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure communication was established and completed between the facility and the hospice nursing staff for one sampled resident (Resident #130) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the Hospice Service Facility Agreement policy and procedure, dated 9/1/2021 showed a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the residents were addressed and met 24 hours per day.Review of the Nursing Facility Services Agreement signed dated 5/24/24 showed the manner in which the facility and hospice were to communicate with each other and document such communications to ensure that the needs of the patients were addressed and met 24 hours a day. 1.Review of Resident #130's admission Sheet dated 5/8/25 showed the following diagnoses:-Anoxic brain damage (type of brain damage resulting from a complete lack of oxygen to the brain, leading to brain cell death).-Dysphagia (inability or difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of one sampled resident (Resident #1). Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) A used CashAPP (a mobile payment service that allows users to send, receive and store money digitally) for multiple withdrawals totaling $617.89 from the resident's bank account out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 112 residents. On 1/24/25, the facility administration was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 1/11/25. Facility staff had subsequently been educated on abuse, neglect and exploitation protocols, resident belongings, and transactions involving resident funds. The money missing from the resident's account was replaced. The deficiency was corrected on 1/13/25. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 8/22/22 showed: -It was the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an discharge notice for one sampled resident (Resident #1) which included the request for an appeal and the location to which the resident was transferred that would meet the resident's level of care out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 108 residents. Review of the facility policy entitled Transfer and Discharge (including Against Medical Advice) dated 9/1/21 showed: -It was the policy of the facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility except in limited situations when the health and safety of the individual or other residents are endangered. -Discharge referred to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified facility or other location in the community, when return to the original facility was not expected. -The facility was to evaluate and determine the level of care needed for the resident prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit one sampled resident (Resident # 1) to return to the facility after hospitalization out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 108 residents. Review of the facility policy Transfer and Discharge (including Against Medical Advice - AMA), dated 9/1/21 showed: -Discharge referred to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified facility or other location in the community, when return to the original facility is not expected. -Transfer and discharge included movement of a resident to a bed outside of the certified facility whether that bed is in the same physical place or not. -Facility-initiated transfer or discharge was a transfer or discharge which the resident objected to, did not originate through a resident's verbal or written request, and/or is not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. -The facility would evaluate and determine the level of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to do the following: maintain the floor of the walk-in refrigerator free of food debris; maintain the ceiling vents over the steam table and the area between the dishwasher and the food preparation table free of a grease buildup; maintain the pipes and floor under the dishwashing area free of grime; maintain the deep fat fryer free of a buildup of grease; wash the food processor between uses with a three-step process instead of a two-step process; maintain the cutting boards free of numerous grooves and areas that were not easily cleanable; and failed to maintain the milk at the south nurse's station. This practice potentially affected 89 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Observations on 10/16/23 from 9:15 A.M. through 1:28 P.M., showed: - One onion was on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator. - Three dessert items were uncovered in the walk-in refrigerator. - The presence of debris in two of the utensil drawers. - A heavy buildup of grease and dirt on the ceiling vents and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that invoices were paid in a timely manner, so they would not be overdue, for the following entities: a pest control company, the local water company, a construction company, a Laboratory testing company, the local water company, and a laundry repair company. This practice potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. During a telephone interview on 10/23/23 at 12:44 P.M., the Customer Service Representative for the pest control company said: - The facility was not current with payments. - The last time a notice was sent to the facility was on 10/5/23. - As of the last notice, the facility owed $2,701.53. 2. During a phone interview on 10/23/23 at 12:58 P.M., the Account Person at the local water company said: - At that time the facility owed a past due amount of $4,835.63. - The most previous notice was sent to the facility on [DATE]. - The water company delivered a notice by hand on 10/17/23. - At that time no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-23 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a quality assurance program regarding interventions of ensuring the interventions from the Registered Dietitian (RD) were included within the resident's medical record and the documentation of the volume of supplements consumed by residents, for continued issues of weight loss. This practice potentially affected at least three residents (Residents #15, #85 and #7) of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Review of the Nutrition and Weight Section of facility's undated Quality Area Report and Analysis, showed the departments (Dietary and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) which were responsible to address weight loss with the percentages of weight loss, which indicated significant weight loss and a blank space in the column under the Action Performance Improvement Program (PIP) dated 7/13/23. 2. Review of the facility's policy, dated 9/1/21, titled Weight Monitoring showed: -Staff were to identify and assess each resident's nutritional status and risk factors. -Staff were to develop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grime, dirt, mouse droppings debris were removed from resident rooms 810, 808, 807, 804, 803, 805, 700, 702, 705, 512, 510, 506, 505, 504, 503, 502, 501, 610, 606, 601, 604, 602, 210, 205, 206, 203. 308, 307, 304, 305, 302, and 300; to maintain the flooring without rips and tears in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; to maintain the mattresses without damaged areas in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; to maintain the tube-feeding pole free of a tube feeding substance debris; and to maintain the ceiling of the 600 Hall shower room free of peeling and chipping paint. This practice potentially affected at least 80 residents who resided in or used those areas throughout the facility. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Observations on 10/17/23 with the Maintenance Director and the Regional Maintenance Director showed: - At 11:02 A.M., there was the presence of grime and cobwebs in the corners of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. - At 11:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #42's face sheet showed he/she was admitted with a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood, and behavior). Review of the resident's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], showed the resident: -Had severe cognitive impairment. -Required staff supervision for eating. Review of the resident's undated Care Plan showed: -Staff were to observe and encourage the resident's intake of food and fluid and offer substitutions if the resident did not like what was being served. -Staff were required to serve and set up the resident's meals. Review of the resident's weight history showed his/her weights were: -179 pounds on 4/6/23. -175 pounds on 7/17/23. -175 pounds on 8/8/23. -170 pounds on 9/12/23. -160 pounds on 10/10/23. -A 10.6% weight loss from 4/6/23 to 10/10/23. Review of the Physician's Progress Note, dated 4/6/23 through 10/12/23 showed the physician did not note any weight loss. Review of the resident's Nurses Notes, dated 10/10/23, showed: -Staff had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain breakfast foods served on the 600 Hall at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) at the time of service to the resident and to maintain the lunch meal served in the Gardens at or close to 120 ºF. This practice potentially affected at least 5 residents who received breakfast room trays on the 600 Hall and at least 10 residents in the Gardens who received lunch trays. The facility also failed to prepare pureed (to make food into a paste or thick liquid suspension usually made from cooked food that was ground finely) garlic bread according to the recipe. This practice caused the pureed garlic bread to be bland. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Observation on 10/16/23 from 9:05 A.M. through 9:13 A.M., showed the temperatures of the following foods at the steam table: - Waffles were 89 ºF. - French Toast sticks were 124 ºF. - Sausage was 138.2 ºF. - Oatmeal cereal was 203 ºF. - Farina was 188.5 ºF. Observation on 10/16/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the housekeeping Supervisor's office was free of mouse droppings; to properly affix a light fixture in the ceiling of the stairwell from the 600 Hall to the Garden's area, so that the light fixture would not be unevenly attached; to ensure the ceiling vent filter in the hallway between the North Nurse's station and the 100 Hall, was filled with a heavy buildup of dust; and to ensure the area under the vending machines were maintained free of debris. This practice affected three non-resident areas (the stairwell, the Housekeeping Supervisor's office and the vending machine area) and one resident use area throughout the facility. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Observations on 10/18/23 with the Maintenance Director and the Regional Maintenance Director showed: - At 9:59 A.M., the presence of mouse droppings in the Housekeeping Supervisor's office. - At 10:42 A.M., the light fixture on the ceiling of the stairwell from the 600 Hall to the Gardens Area, was attached but one side of it was not properly attached. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure required negative backflow ventilation was available in the following areas. The Gardens soiled utility room, the Garden's shower room, resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the South Nurse's station soiled utility room, resident room [ROOM NUMBER], resident room [ROOM NUMBER], and the 300 Hall shower room. This practice potentially affected at least 45 residents who resided in or used those areas in the facility. The facility census was 91 residents. Note: Air flow was tested by holding one piece of tissue paper to the ceiling vent. If the paper was sucked up, then negative air flow was present; if the paper fell to the floor, then negative airflow was absent. 1. Observations with the Maintenance Director and the Regional Maintenance Director on 10/17/23, showed: - At 11:31 A.M., negative air flow was absent from the Gardens soiled utility room. - At 11:44 A.M., negative air flow was absent from the Garden's shower room. During an interview on 10/17/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to remove numerous dead flies that were on the window sill in the kitchen above the two compartment sink and to ensure openings in the attic area above the 500 Hall were properly sealed to prevent the entrance of birds. This practice potentially affected the kitchen area and 14 residents in the 500 Hall. 1. Observation on 10/16/23 at 9:11 A.M., 10:46 A.M. and 2:13 P.M., showed the presence of numerous dead flies on the window sill above the 2 compartment sink. During an interview on 10/16/23 at 2:24 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said they need to clean that area every other day. 2. Observation with the Maintenance Director on 10/17/23 at 10:07 A.M., showed a 5 feet (ft.) 6 inches (in.) wide tear in the screen at the end of the attic and the presence of bird droppings in the attic area close to the screen at the outside end of the attic. During an interview on 10/17/23 at 10:10 A.M., the Maintenance Director said the day he/she was in the attic with the state surveyor, was the first day he/she saw the damaged screen and he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity for one sampled resident who received incontinence care (Resident #22) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Upon exit the facility did not provide a policy on privacy/dignity. 1. Review of Resident #22's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood (high blood glucose), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization/ thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), swallowing disorder, muscle wasting, altered mental status, high blood pressure, abnormal posture, and dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device, once activated, that alerts nursing staff help is needed in that room) was appropriate for the resident, within reach, and properly care planned, for two sampled residents (Resident #42 and #45) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy, dated 9/1/2021, titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response showed: -Staff were to evaluate each resident for unique needs and preferences and determine if any special accommodations are needed for the resident to use the call light system. -Special accommodations will be identified on the resident's care plan and provided accordingly. -Examples of special accommodations were light touch pads, larger buttons, and brighter colors. -Staff were to ensure the call light was within reach of the resident each time they entered the resident's room. Review of the facility's policy, dated 9/1/23, titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Third Party Liability (TPL) form to Missouri (MO) Health Net, for one deceased resident (Resident #500) within 30 days after the death of the resident. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #500 showed the resident passed away on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Trust Account records showed the resident had $255 in his/her account on the day of death. During an interview on [DATE] (240 days after the resident's death), at 12:37 P.M., the Interim Business Office Manager (BOM) said there was not a TPL form sent after the resident passed away on [DATE]. He/She did not know why any of the previous two BOMs did not send the TPL form.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate grooming by not removing facial hair for one sampled resident (Resident #75) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 19 residents. Review of the facility's policy, dated 9/1/21, titled Grooming a Resident's Facial Hair showed: -Staff were to assist residents with grooming facial hair. 1. Review of Resident #75's face sheet showed he/she was admitted with a diagnosis of a Cerebral Infarction (stroke-occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it). Review of the resident's undated Care Plan showed staff documented the resident: -Was totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene. -Had communication problems and difficulty answering questions. -NOTE: No mention of facial hair in the care plan. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated tool used for care planning), dated 7/14/23, showed staff documented the resident: -Had a severe cognitive impairment. -Was totally dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for wound treatments; to assess wounds weekly; to document wound care when completed, and/or to transcribe physician's orders when wound treatments changed for two sampled residents (Resident #19 and #241) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy Documentation of Wound treatments dated 2021, showed: -The facility completes accurate documentation of wound assessment and treatments including response to treatment, change in condition and changes in treatments. -Wound treatments are documented at the time of each treatment. If no treatment is due, an indication on the status of the dressing shall be documented each shift. (i.e., clean, dry, intact). -Additional document shall include, but not limited to: Date and Time of wound treatment, modification of treatment or interventions and notifications to physicians or responsible party regarding wound or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physicians orders for use of low air loss mattress (LAL)(an air mattress covered with tiny holes that are designed to let out air very slowly which helps keep the skin dry and [NAME] away any moisture) to include the setting for the mattress, to ensure the monitor of the setting of the LAL were set for resident's weight and to ensure the mattress settings were documented in the resident's medical record for one sampled resident (Resident #1), who had pressure ulcers (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. A facility policy for low air loss mattress was requested and not received at the time of exit. Review of the facility's policy Documentation of Wound treatments dated 2021, showed: -The facility completes accurate documentation of wound assessment and treatments including response to treatment, change in condition and changes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking for one sampled resident (Resident #53) who experienced seizures and was known by the facility to be non-compliant with smoking rules and to ensure a safe transfer was completed on one sampled resident (Resident #15) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility Smoking Policy dated 8/1/22, showed: -Smoking is prohibited in all areas except designated smoking areas. -All residents and family members will be notified of this policy during the admission process and as needed. -Residents who smoke will be further assessed, using a smoking assessment to determine whether or not supervision is required for smoking, or if a resident is safe to smoke at all. -Any resident who is deemed safe to smoke, with or without supervision, will be allowed to smoke in designated smoking areas at designated times and in accordance with his/her care plan. -If a resident who smokes experiences any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained with the placement of Indwelling Foley catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through urethra) drainage bag (catheter bag, a bag that hold drained urine) kept below the level of bladder during transfer and cares for one sampled resident (Resident #1) who at risk for infections, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census of 91 residents. Review of the facility's Catheter Care Policy copyright 2021 showed to ensure catheter drainage bag were located below the level of the bladder to discourage backflow of urine. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted with a diagnosis of Neurogenic Bladder (a disorder of urinary bladder control due to damage to the spinal cord or to the nerves supplying the bladder). Review of the resident's Catheter Care Plan revised on 2/11/23 showed: -The resident had an indwelling Foley catheter. -Position his/her catheter drainage bag and tubing below level of bladder. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders included monitoring of the resident's dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally) port (a catheter used for exchanging blood to and from a hemodialysis machine and a patient) and fistula (a surgically created connection between vein and artery that allows direct access to the bloodstream for dialysis) sites; to ensure the resident's fistula and port sites were monitored and documented daily; to write a care plan that included dialysis and to ensure post dialysis documentation and monitoring was consistently completed for one sampled resident (Resident #19) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility Dialysis policy and procedure dated November 2017, showed: -The facility will ensure that each resident received care and services for the provision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure three trash containers were covered during the meal service preparation and to ensure the trash was removed from the grounds around the outdoor trash dumpster. This practice affected the kitchen and one outdoor area. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Observations on 10/16/23 at 9:25 A.M., 10:09 A.M., 10:40 A.M., 12:41 P.M., and 2:02 P.M., showed three open trash containers in the kitchen which were opened and were not being used. During an interview on 10/16/23 at 2:37 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said: - He/She expected staff to cover trash containers when they were not being use. - He/She did not have a cover for the rectangle trash container and - He/She noticed all three trash containers were which still opened. 2. Observation on 10/17/23 at 1:59 P.M., showed assorted trash including bags, foam containers, glass bottles, paper, plastic containers, and leaves were on the grounds around the outdoor dumpster. During an interview on 10/17/23 at 2:01 P.M., the Maintenance Director said some the trash may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of the communication between the contracted Hospice (comfort care provided at end of life) provider and the facility by failing to have obtain documentation by hospice nursing staff to include Nurse progress notes and Routine Visits for two sampled residents (Resident #14 and #34) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy, dated 2021, titled Coordination of Hospice Service, showed: -The facility was to coordinate care in cooperation with hospice staff. -The facility was to communicate with hospice and document all interventions put into place by hospice and the facility. 1. Review of Resident #14's admission Face Sheet showed the resident had an diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (a disease in which your body's immune system eats away at the protective sheath that covers your nerves) and palliative care (is specialized medical care for people living with a serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure handwashing was completed to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care for two sampled residents (Resident #22 and #15) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. The Infection Control Policy on Handwashing was requested but was not received by the exit date. 1. Review of Resident #22's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood (high blood glucose), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization/ thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), swallowing disorder, muscle wasting, altered mental status, high blood pressure, abnormal posture, and dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer to formulate advanced directives (documents that allow one to communicate their health care preferences when decision-making capacity is lost) and/or a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA- a person previously identified to make decisions for an individual in the event of inability to make wishes known) for three sampled residents (Resident #3, #35, and #93) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives revised 4/30/22 showed: -On admission, the facility would determine if the resident had advanced directives. -If not, the staff would offer to formulate advanced directives in a manner that was easy to understand. -During the care planning process, the advanced directives would be periodically reviewed. 1. Record review of Resident #35's admission Record showed: -He/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to remove mouse droppings (the excrement of certain animals, such as rodents, sheep, birds, and insects) from resident rooms 809, 605, 603, 604 and 602; to address the pungent urine odor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and 209; to ensure that there was not a buildup of dust on the wall mounted fan in the therapy room; to ensure there was not a buildup of dust on the area where the blades join to the motor of the ceiling fan in the North Family Room; and to ensure the pillows in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and 301 were maintained in a easily cleanable condition. This practice potentially affected at least 40 residents who resided in or used those areas within the facility. The facility census was 115 residents. 1. Observation on 5/20/22 at 2:05 P.M., of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: -The presence of mouse droppings along with the resident's socks and gloves in the 2nd drawer. -The presence of mouse droppings with two pairs of pajama bottoms, one pajama…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have care plan conferences for three sampled residents (Resident #3, #48, and #5) to ensure a person centered care plan was reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Record review of the facility's Care Planning - Resident Participation policy, revised 4/30/22 showed: -The facility supports the resident's right to be informed of and participate in his/her care planning and treatment. -The facility will inform the resident in a language he/she can understand of his/her rights regarding planning and implementation of care, including the right to be informed of his/her total health status. -The physician or other practitioner/professional will inform the resident and/or resident representative of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment and treatment alternatives/options. -The facility will inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the care to be furnished…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct diet and needed assistance was provided to one sampled resident (Resident #5) who had experienced significant weight loss and was dependent upon staff to provide his/her meals and who required supervision and encouragement during meals; to ensure the correct diet orders were provided at meals and failed to provide assistance with meals for one sampled resident (Resident #84) with weight loss; to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #35) with protein calorie malnutrition (the state of inadequate intake of food) received the correct diet orders at meals; and to notify the physician and obtain physician's orders to increase one sampled resident's (Resident #106) tube feeding following a weight loss as recommended by the Registered Dietician (RD), out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Record review of the facility's Weight Monitoring policy, revised 4/30/22 showed: -The facility will ensure all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis had a correct physician's order indicating when the resident was to go for dialysis treatment; to obtain orders directing staff to monitor the Central Venous Catheter (CVC) and to ensure communication between the facility and dialysis center was maintained and ongoing to ensure the continuum of care for one sampled resident (Resident #35) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Hemodialysis policy showed: -The facility would have on-going communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. -If a resident had catheter access (also called a Central Venous Catheter-CVC: which is a flexible, long, plastic, y-shaped tube that is threaded through your skin into a central vein in your neck, chest or groin for dialysis access), the nursing staff should assess the CVC site on every shift to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-26 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) received the required 12 hours in-service education; to ensure competencies were completed, and to provide dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses) education based on performance reviews annually. The facility census was 115 residents. A policy was requested and not received by the facility. 1. Record review of the last year of training included the following: -On [DATE] a training on medication pass, borrowing medications from other residents. -On [DATE] abuse and neglect. -On [DATE] elopement, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR-an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating), night nurse duties, incident reports and notification, taking vital signs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply a process of coordination between the nursing and dietary departments; and to implement a system of monitoring test trays (a food tray that is evaluated for quality, including taste and temperature of a meal during a normal meal service and used to identify any areas for improvement) to ensure that food temperatures of room tray meals were maintained at or close to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF ) at the time of delivery, for at least 8 residents who were served later in the delivery process on 300 Hall on 5/19/22 and at least 10 residents who were served later in the delivery process on 500 Hall on 5/23/22. The facility census was 115 residents. 1. Record review of Resident#84's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 4/21/22, showed the resident was able to make himself/herself understood, was able to understand others, had no swallowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen floor free of debris; to maintain the walk-in floor free of debris; to place a date on the tray that the ground meat was pulled from the freezer for slackening; to maintain the ceiling vents and light fixtures free of dust and grease buildup; to maintain the utensil storage drawers free of food debris; to ensure the light fixture over the dishwasher area illuminated; to ensure three utensils were maintained in an easily cleanable condition; to ensure that all employees wore hair coverings to cover their hair completely; and to check the temperature of eggs before placing then on a plate for service to a resident. This practice potentially affected 111 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 115 residents. 1. Observations on 5/19/22, from 8:42 A.M. through 11:49 A.M., showed: - At 8:42 A.M., a heavy buildup of debris was present under the dishwasher area. - At 8:44 A.M., food debris was present the three utensil storage containers. - At 8:47 A.M., there was food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lids of the outdoor dumpster was closed on 5/19/22, 5/24/22 and 5/25/22. This practice potentially affected the outdoor premises of the facility with the potential of pest harborage. The facility census was 115 residents. 1. Observation on 5/19/22 at 10:27 A.M., showed the lid to the outdoor dumpster lid was open. Observation on 5/19/22 at 10:32 A.M., showed two employees went to the dumpster to dump trash. Observation on 5/19/22 at 10:44 A.M., and 12:04 P.M., showed the dumpster lid was open. Observation on 5/24/22 at 8:33 A.M., showed the lid to the outdoor dumpster was open. During an interview on 5/24/22 at 8:37 A.M., the Administrator said facility staff should close the lid after they dump trash into the dumpster and he/she has ordered a second dumpster, but it has not arrived as yet. Observation on 5/25/22 at 11:28 A.M. and at 1:33 P.M. showed the lid to the outdoor dumpster was open. During an interview on 5/25/22 at 1:44 P.M., the Housekeeping Supervisor said he/she expected facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Agency (SA) of an injury of unknown origin for one sampled resident (Resident #73) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 3/28/22 showed: -The facility should report to the SA immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation was made if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury. -Not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and did not result in bodily injury. 1. Record review of Resident #73's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin to determine if abuse occurred for one sampled resident (Resident #73) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 3/28/22 showed: -Possible indicators of abuse were physical injury of an unknown source. -The facility should focus on the investigation and determine if abuse or neglect had occurred focusing on the extent and the cause. -Provide complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. 1. Record review of Resident #73's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses). Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review,the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) for two sampled residents (Resident #48 and #37) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. 1. Record review Resident #48's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Schizophrenia (a long-term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation). -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent dread, that can interfere with daily life). -Major depressive disorder (a state of intense sadness or despair that has advanced to the point of being disruptive to an individual's social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for one sampled resident (Resident #93) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine from the bladder) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 115 residents. The facility did not have a policy regarding catheter placement during transfers. 1. Record review of Resident #93's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems). -Stroke. Record review of the resident's Clinical Physician Orders sheet showed on 10/27/21 an order for indwelling catheter for wound healing. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen floor in good repair; to maintain the threshold to the walk-in fridge in good repair; to maintain the area under the Garden's area breakroom refrigerator clean and free of food of debris; to maintain the window blinds in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]; to maintain the window pane (single sheet of glass in a window or door) in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] in good repair; to ensure the restroom door in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] closed to provide privacy; to maintain the commode seats in resident rooms 506, 503 and 602; and to ensure the cold side of the faucet in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], had a knob to turn the cold side of the water on. This practice potentially affected at least 15 resident who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 115 residents. 1. Observation on 5/19/22 of the kitchen at 9:40 A.M., showed the 36.5 inch (in.) wooden threshold at the entrance of the walk-in fridge, moved back and forth when it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$35,683 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-02-23
- $10,550 — penalty dated 2025-04-23
- $9,198 — penalty dated 2025-01-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAYTOWN ROAD CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/17/2025 |
| DAVIS, MICAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2024 |
| MILLER, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2023 |
| TADAKAMALLA, SRINATH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $314K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265339. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.