Atrium Place Health And Rehabilitation
2600 Redman Road, Saint Louis, MO 63136 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (314) 355-8585 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $157,667 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-25)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.1% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 71.9% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.8% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.0% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.15 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.1%CMS range 28.6–68.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.7–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.3–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.35 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, a lifesaving technique that's used in emergencies in which someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) for one (Resident #1) of three sampled residents. Resident #1 had physician orders for a full code status. On [DATE] shortly before 7:00 A.M., staff removed the resident's oxygen when transferring the resident to bed, placed him/her on the bed in a flat position and as staff turned him/her, the resident was noted not to be breathing. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A got the Nurse Manager (NM), who said the resident died. The NM told LPN A two nurses could verify a resident's death. Staff did not perform CPR. The resident expired. The facility had 89 out of 94 resident who were listed as full code. The census was 94. The administrator was informed on [DATE] of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of one resident's (Resident #1) low lab results and to ensure the Medical Director (MD) and other physicians had full access to lab results in the system the physicians use. The MD was not aware of lab results for seizure medications for Resident #1, and the resident sustained seizure activity 18 days later. The facility also failed to ensure the physician was notified when Resident #1 had a change of condition of new purple discoloration to the resident's fingertips at 8:30 P.M. and did not notify the on call Nurse Practitioner (NP) until approximately 4:30 A.M. after the resident had a fall. The facility failed to document the initial assessment of the change of condition in the medical record. In addition, the facility failed to check gastrostomy tube (g-tube a thin, flexible tube inserted directly into the stomach through a small incision in the abdomen) residuals (the volume of fluid remaining in the stomach) for one of three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, and care plan interventions related to pain for one of six sampled residents (Resident #3). The facility failed to timely administer pain medications in accordance with the physician's orders. Additionally, facility staff failed to follow up with resident pain medication to ensure availability for administration and failed to implement measures, including use of medication available in the facility starter kit/emergency drug kit, when the resident's pain medications were unavailable. The census was 94. Review of the Medication Reordering policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services including the provision of routine and emergency medications and biologicals in a timely manner to meet the needs of each resident; -The facility will utilize a systematic approach to provide or obtain routine and emergency medications and biologicals in order to meet the needs of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Home Dialysis Treatment policy and Notification of Changes policy for one resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with an order for dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) three times a week. Facility staff failed to provide or attempt to provide the resident's transportation to/from dialysis on 11/8/23 and to communicate with the dialysis facility to request a different time for dialysis. Staff also failed to contact the resident's physician of the missed appointment timely and was not notified of the missed dialysis until 11/9/23. In addition, the facility failed to reassess/monitor and notify the physician of the resident's low blood pressure (BP) obtained on the evening of 11/8/23. Approximately two hours after the resident's low BP was obtained, the resident was sent to the hospital where he/she was admitted with a diagnoses of a critically high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have physician orders for the resident's immediate care when staff failed to transcribe one resident's surgical wound treatments from the hospital discharge orders into the facility physician orders and failed to obtain a treatment order for the coccyx (tailbone) wound, which was present on admission, which resulted in the treatment not being provided/documented for four days after admission (Resident #111). The sample size was 24. The census was 102. The administrator was notified on 6/26/25, of past non-compliance. When the facility identified the issue, they immediately assessed the resident's current condition, notified the physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP). Treatment orders were put in place per provider's order. The admitting nurse and wound nurse received corrective actions. Nurses were educated on ensuring all orders were transcribed properly and obtaining wound orders upon notification of admission and/or new skin issues and on documentation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) order for intravenous (IV) fluids following critical laboratory results for one of 24 sampled residents (resident #68). The NP order for IV fluids was entered into the electronic physician's order sheet (ePOS). There was no documentation the IV fluids were administered. The resident continued to decline and was transferred to the hospital for treatment. The census was 102. Review of the medical provider order policy, reviewed 5/4/26, showed:-Policy: use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders;-Explanation and guidelines:--Medications and/or treatments should be administered upon signed order;--Verbal orders should be received only by nurses, pharmacist or verified in writing by the medical provider;-Following of medication/treatment orders:--Medical provider orders should be reviewed prior to administration of medication and/or treatment to validate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided were consistent with professional standards when one resident (Resident #111) was admitted to the facility with a physician's order for a regular diet with Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN, a nutrient solution, including lipids, that is administered through a central venous access device. This solution usually consists of proteins. carbohydrates, electrolytes, vitamins. trace minerals, and lipids (as indicated)); and staff failed to transcribe the order into the medical record and/or failed to document communication with the hospital showing the physician order was changed. The sample was 24. The census was 102.The Administrator was notified on 06/26/26, of the past non-compliance. When the facility identified the issue, they immediately assessed the resident's current condition for decline or complications related to nutrition or treatment interruption. Staff reviewed the resident's admission records and available hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure one resident (Resident #12) received the correct treatment order for a pressure injury (damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure) and failed to update the resident's care plan to include the resident's pressure injury. In addition, two residents received new treatment orders for pressure injuries on 1/2/26, that were not implemented until 1/5/26, and staff failed to ensure one of those two residents with an order for off-loading boots (pressure relieving boots) wore those boots at all times as ordered (Residents #4 and #1). Five residents were sampled for pressure injuries, four current residents and one discharged resident, and problems were found with three. The census was 98.Review of the facility Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy dated 9/1/21 and revised on 1/23/23, showed:-Policy: This facility is committed to the prevention and avoidable pressure injuries and the promotion of healing of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy while providing care to residents that required EBP precautions during high contact activities. Five residents were observed during skin assessments, treatments and/or personal care, and staff failed to wear gowns during four of those five observations. (Residents #1, #4, #7 and #12). The census was 98.Review of the facility Enhanced [NAME] Precautions policy dated 1/1/23 and revised on 4/23/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs);-Definitions: - Enhanced barrier precautions refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDROs that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff and clothing;-Policy Explanation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards by not following physician orders and not obtaining one resident's vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, respirations and oxygen saturation) (Resident #1). The sample was three. The census was 100. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders policy, revised, [DATE], showed: -Policy: The facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders; -Following of medication and/or treatment orders: -Medical provider orders should be reviewed prior to administration of medication and/or treatment to validate the orders contain all required elements; -Staff should follow all valid medical provider orders timely unless there is an emergency which would temporarily delay the implementation of the order; -If an order does not contain all the required elements, staff should contact the ordering provider for clarification of the order prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document completed wound treatments or treatment refusals by the resident on the treatment administration record (TAR) for one resident (Resident #1). The sample was three. The census was 100. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders policy, revised, [DATE], showed: -Policy: The facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders; -Following of medication and/or treatment orders: -Medical provider orders should be reviewed prior to administration of medication and/or treatment to validate the orders contain all required elements; -Staff should follow all valid medical provider orders timely unless there is an emergency which would temporarily delay the implementation of the order; -If an order does not contain all the required elements, staff should contact the ordering provider for clarification of the order prior to implementation of the order. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when two residents were involved in physical resident to resident altercation, after an argument escalated with both residents hitting each other (Residents #1 and #2). The residents were separated by staff and other nearby residents. The sample was four. The census was 91. The facility was notified of past non-compliance on 9/25/24. Facility staff notified administration, separated the residents, and provided assessment and services to the involved residents. Staff were in-serviced on the abuse and neglect prevention, intervention and de-escalation of resident arguments and disagreements. This deficiency was corrected on 9/18/24. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. One resident's air conditioning unit leaked into the room, causing puddles under the bed and a wet feel and smell in the room (Resident #78). One resident's call light indicator, above his/her room door, did not work resulting in a delay in staff answering the call light (Resident #16). In addition, staff failed to provide a homelike environment on the 300 hall when there were floor tiles chipped, baseboard and transition strips chipped and broken along the floor, and the door frame for room [ROOM NUMBER] pulled away. The census was 85. The sample was 18. Review of the facility's Nursing Home Residents' Rights, provided to residents upon admission to the facility, showed: -Residents of nursing homes have rights that are guaranteed by the federal Nursing Home Reform Law. The law requires nursing homes to promote and protect the rights of each resident and stresses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. One resident was not positioned in an upright position during meals, resulting in a coughing episode (Resident #6). In addition, staff failed to adequately monitor smoke breaks to ensure residents followed facility protocol for safe smoking for two of three smoke breaks observed (Residents #33, #82, and #41). The census was 85. The sample was 18. 1. Review of Resident #6's care plan, in use at the time of the survey, showed: -Diagnoses included dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); -Focus: Current functional performance Hoyer (mechanical lift) and new recliner wheelchair: -Goal: Will progress towards personal discharge goals; -Interventions included: Eating: independent/set-up help only. Transfer: Total assist/one-person physical assist; -Focus: Activity of daily living self-care performance/limited physical mobility deficit related to cognitive deficit with impaired safety awareness with lower extremity weakness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week during the most recent available quarterly payroll-based journal (PBJ) staffing report. The sample was 18. The census was 85. Review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated for Quarter 2 20204 (January 1- March 31), showed: -This staffing data report identifies areas of concern that will e triggered (e.g., requires follow-up during the survey); -One star staffing rating: Triggered; -No RN hours: Triggered; -Infraction dates: Thursday 3/21, Friday 3/22, Saturday 3/23, Sunday 3/24, Saturday 3/30, Sunday 3/31. During an interview during the entrance conference, on 7/29/24 at 10:27 A.M., the Administrator said Corporate Staff B is responsible for the PBJ reports. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 7:50 A.M., Corporate Staff B said he/she had been helping with the PBJ reports and did a lot of the input. He/She verified the PBJ report is accurate and had confirmed it with the administrator at the time. He/She had suggested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two of two narcotic books reviewed. The census was 85. Review of the Facility's Controlled Substance Administration & Accountability policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: it is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure; -Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: -Inventory Verification: for areas without automated dispensing systems, two licensed nurses or per state regulations account for all controlled substances and access keys at the end of each shift. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Shift Change Count -Check Sheet, for the dates of 7/1/24 through 7/29/24, showed: -Station: 300; -Number of packages: -73 out of 87…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication rate less than 5%. Out of 27 opportunities for errors, four errors occurred resulting in a 14.81% medication error rate (Residents #18, #72 and #50). The sample was 18. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; -Policy explanation and compliance guidelines; -Review Medication Administration Record (MAR) to identify medication to be administered; -Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR to verify name, medication, form, dose, route, and time; -Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturers specifications; -Crush medications as ordered. Do not crush medications with do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and facility policy in three of three medication carts reviewed. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated [DATE], showed it is the policy of this facility to ensure all medication housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated [DATE], showed identify expiration date. If expired, notify nurse manager. 1. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 7:15 A.M., of the 100/700 nurse medication cart, showed in the top drawer, one out of three Aspart insulin (short acting insulin) pens opened and undated. The Director of Nursing (DON) said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the presence of flies in the kitchen. The facility census was 85. Observation of the kitchen on 7/29/24 at 10:30 A.M., showed the backdoor to the outside left opened. There were several flies throughout the food prep areas of the kitchen, outside of the walk-in cooler, and inside the dry food storage room. There were flies outside of the walk-in cool. Observation of the kitchen on 7/30/24 at 6:27 A.M. and 7:05 A.M., showed multiple flies throughout the food prep areas of the kitchen. There was a swarm of flies outside of the walk-in cooler. The backdoor to the outside stood opened. Observation of the kitchen on 8/1/24 at 7:30 A.M. and 12:25 P.M., showed multiple flies throughout the food prep area of the kitchen. The backdoor to outside remained opened. During an interview on 8/2/24 at 9:07 A.M., the administrator said she would expect for the kitchen to be free of flies and for the back door to be closed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a manner to maintain dignity and respect for one sampled resident (Resident #59). The sample size was 18. The census was 85. The facility was notified of past non-compliance on 8/3/24. Facility staff immediately intervened, separated the resident and staff, reported the incident, and began their investigation. The investigation consisted of written statements, interviews from witness, and other staff and residents on the unit. Staff were in-serviced on abuse and neglect prevention and promoting/maintaining resident dignity. The deficiency was corrected on 7/2/24. Review of the facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 7/2/24, showed: -Policy: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality; -Compliance Guidelines: All staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services based on acceptable standards of practice by not obtaining a physician order for one resident who was using a Bi-level positive airway pressure (bi-pap, helps with breathing) machine (Resident #16) and for failing to complete neuro check documentation for one resident who fell (Resident #63). The sample was 18. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders Policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: this facility shall use uniform guidelines for ordering and following medical providers orders; -Medications and/or treatments should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. Review of the facility's Fall Prevention Program Policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls; -Definitions: fall: an event in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident #92) with a seizure disorder free from a significant medication error, when the facility failed to obtain Vimpat (medication used to prevent seizures) from the pharmacy timely, resulting in the medication not being administered for four and half days. The sample was 18. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Unavailable Medication Policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -The facility maintains a contract with a pharmacy provider to supply the facility with routine, as needed (PRN), and emergency medications; -Medications may be unavailable for a number of reasons. Staff shall take immediate action when it is known that the medication is unavailable: -Determine reason for unavailability, length of time medication is unavailable, and what efforts have been attempted by the facility or pharmacy provider to obtain the medications. -Notify physician of inability to obtain medications upon notification or awareness that medication is not available. Obtain alternative treatment orders and/or specific orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for one resident (Resident #8) who was left exposed in the hall with other residents present when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F refused to get the resident a gown or blanket when he/she got finished in the shower. The census was 92. The sample was 8. The administrator was notified on 5/14/24, of the past non-compliance. Staff were in-serviced on resident rights, the resident's concerns were addressed, and the staff person responsible was terminated. The deficiency was corrected on 5/10/24. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, last revised 9/1/22, showed: -All residents will be treated equally regardless of age, race, ethnicity, religion, culture, language, physical or mental disabilities, socioeconomic status, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression; -The facility will ensure that all staff members are educated on the rights of residents and the responsibility of the facility to properly care for its residents; -The resident has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction) receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for two of three residents observed to receive pressure ulcer care (Residents #2 and #7). The census was 92. The sample was 8. Review of the facility's Wound Treatment Management policy, dated 9/1/22, showed: -Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; -Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change; -In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify the physician to obtain treatment orders. This may be the treatment nurse, or the assigned licensed nurse in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one resident with a diagnosis of severe protein-calorie malnutrition and who was categorized as severely underweight and who had a wound, when staff failed to accurately monitor the resident's weights, failed to timely document weights obtained, and failed to accurately document nutritional supplement administration, resulting in the registered dietician using inaccurate weights and inaccurate information to determine the resident's nutritional status and nutritional needs. In addition, the facility failed to provide the resident's physician and dietician ordered nutritional supplements to the resident (Resident #7). This resulted in weight loss of 3.9% from March to April 2024, and the resident's continued severely underweight status. The census was 92. The sample was 8. Review of the facility's Weight Monitoring policy, dated 9/1/22, showed: -Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of resident to resident verbal abuse, which was overheard by Licensed Practical Nurse C, involving Resident #1 and Resident #2 to facility management and to the Department of Health of Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour time frame. The sample was three. The census was 95. The Administrator was notified on 5/8/24, of the past non-compliance, which began on 4/28/24. The facility had in-serviced all staff on the Abuse Policy: Reporting and Response. The deficiency was corrected on 4/29/24. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy revised 8/22/22, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Definitions: -Abuse: Means the willful infliction of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services for a resident's psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's behaviors, which included verbal aggression, for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Review of the facility's Behavior Management policy, revised 9/1/22, showed: -Residents who exhibit behavioral concerns may require a behavior management care plan to ensure they are receiving appropriate services and interventions to meet their needs. The interdisciplinary team, including the family member, should develop a behavioral plan for each resident with identified behaviors through the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, helps staff in gathering definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan) process; -A behavioral plan can include a schedule of daily life events, which addresses the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services to promote the healing of a foot wound for one resident sampled for wounds (Resident #3). The sample size was six. The census was 94. Review of the facility's Wound Treatment policy, revised 9/1/24, showed: -Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; -Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change; -In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify physician to obtain treatment orders. This may be the treatment nurse, or the assigned licensed nurse in the absence of the treatment nurse; -Dressing changes may be provided outside the frequency parameters in certain situations: -Feces has seeped underneath the dressing; -The dressing has dislodged; -The dressing is soiled otherwise, or is wet;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents (Residents #1 and #3) received room trays with food that was palatable and at the required temperatures for safe consumption. The sample was six. The census was 94. Review of the facility's Record of Food Temperatures policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperature(s) before trays are assembled; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Food temperatures will be checked on all items prepared in the dietary department; -Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or greater; -Hot foods will be stirred during holding to redistribute heat throughout the food product; -Food containers will be kept covered to retain heat and prevent environmental contaminants from entering the food; -Measure and record the temperatures for each food product and milk at all meals. Record temperature on temperature log;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% by failing to administer medications at the prescribed times to eight out of nine sampled residents, resulting in a 88% error rate (Residents #8, #2, #5, #9, #7, #3, #4 and #6 ). In addition, the facility failed to have a policy that addressed expectations when medications were not administered with 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time. The sample was 9. The census was 81 Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, undated, showed: -Medications were administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practices, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; -Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. 1. Observations of the 600 hall on 1/9/24, from 10:23 A.M. through 12:15 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A, CMT C and CMT D passing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in infection prevention and control as the Infection Preventionist for the facility's infection prevention control program. The census was 81. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 10:10 A.M., the Administrator said the facility's designated Infection Preventionist (IP) had resigned at the end of December 2023. Nurse B was meant to act as the facility's backup IP but the Administrator was not sure if Nurse B had finished his/her coursework from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Infection Prevention training program. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 10:13 A.M., Nurse B said he/she did not complete modules and trainings for the IP program. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 10:14 A.M., the Administrator said the facility currently did not have an IP. The plan was to have either the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing complete the course to fulfill the role. MO00229908
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, by staff failing to follow contact and droplet precautions during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility for four of eight sampled residents (Residents #2, #15, and #16). The census was 81. Review of the facility's COVID-19 Prevention, Response and Reporting policy, reviewed on 5/15/23, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure that appropriate interventions are implemented to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and promptly respond to any suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infections; -Healthcare providers who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to standard precautions and use a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved particulate respirator (air-purifying respirators protects by filtering particles out of the air the user is breathing) with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves and eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff ordered intravenous (IV) antibiotics from the pharmacy on 11/10/23, causing one resident to miss his/her first scheduled doses of vancomycin and ceftriaxone on 11/11/23 (Resident #5). Staff failed to order seizure and sleep apnea (a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts) medication for one additional resident (Resident #11). Staff failed to notify the Director of Nurses (DON), physician and family of the missed doses of antibiotics and missed doses of seizure and sleep apnea medications. The facility failed to ensure one nurse knew how to mix another resident's antibiotic with a solution to administer the antibiotics as ordered. That nurse failed to initial the missed dose on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), failed to document the missed dose, and failed to notify the DON, physician and family of the missed dose in the progress note (Resident #10). In addition, staff failed to initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was free from physical abuse (Resident #6). On 11/27/23, Resident #11 had his/her hands around Resident #6's neck, and began to choke and hit him/her on the back of the head. The sample was 11. The census was 82. The Administrator was notified on 12/12/23 of the past non-compliance. The facility immediately intervened and separated the residents, arranged for ongoing medical care for both residents, updated the care plans of both residents and provided training for all staff regarding the facility's abuse prevention policy. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention policy, updated 4/2021, showed the following: -Policy Statement: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse and physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to wear hair restraints to fully cover their hair and/or facial hair and by failing to perform hand hygiene after touching contaminated surfaces. Additionally, staff failed to ensure the floors in the dry storage area were free from grime and debris, and to ensure trashcans were covered while not in use. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who ate meals at the facility. The census was 73. 1. Review of the facility's Handwashing Guidelines for Dietary Employees policy, revised 9/1/21, showed: -Policy: Handwashing is necessary to prevent the spread of bacteria that may cause foodborne illnesses; -Compliance Guidelines included: -Dietary employees shall keep their hands and exposed portions of their arms clean; -Frequency of Handwashing: Dietary employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule and organize resident council meetings for residents who wished to participate in group meetings. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Statement of Resident Rights, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -Under federal and state laws, you have the following rights and responsibilities; -The right to participate in the resident council. During an interview on 7/20/22 at 10:19 A.M., the Activity Director said resident council meetings should be held on a monthly basis and should be scheduled by the Activity Director. The Activity Director started her position with the facility three months ago and obtained her certification for the position two weeks ago. She has not held any resident council meetings, yet. Resident council meetings are held so residents can express their opinions about the facility, their likes and dislikes, and their concerns. Any concerns noted during the meetings should be discussed with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, for two of two central baths observed. Staff failed to ensure air conditioning units, light covers, vanity drawers, chairs, and dresser draws were in good repair and the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were at a comfortable level for six residents (Residents #6, #61, #55, #33, #45 and 13). The sample was 18. Then census was 73. 1. Review of the facility's housekeeping project schedule, for July 2022, showed shower rooms scheduled for deep cleaning on Thursdays. 2. Observation of the 300 A central bath, on 7/18/22 at 8:33 A.M., 7/19/22 at 6:57 A.M. and 7/20/22 at 8:25 A.M., showed: -The bottom left corner of the closet next to the sink, with water damage. The wood swollen, peeled and chipped; -The paint chipped and peeled on the bottom left corner of the sink cabinet; -A chair in the shower with a rip approximately 8 inch long with foam exposed. The foam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status, by failing to ensure all required sections of the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) were assessed for seven residents (Residents #47, #39, #45, #30, #22, #6 and #46). The sample was 18. The census was 73. 1. Resident #47 admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Interview for activity preferences, blank; -Staff assessment of daily and activity preferences, blank. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Should the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) be conducted: Yes; -BIMS, blank; -Should the resident mood interview be conducted: Yes; -Resident mood interview, blank. Observation on 7/19/22 at 7:03 A.M., showed the resident lay in bed, asleep. At 12:01 P.M., the resident said he/she liked to get out of his/her room, but he/she does not get to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four residents (Residents #30, #7, #6 and #39) to include smoking needs that matched the smoking assessment and transfer status. The sample was 18. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Resident Smoking policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -This facility provides a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors and employees, including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking residents; -Safe smoking measures will be documented on each resident's care plan and communicated to staff, visitors, and volunteers, who will be responsible for supervising residents while smoking. Supervision will be provided as indicated on each resident's care plan. 1. Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 6/7/22, showed: -Understood and understands;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities. The facility failed to offer activities in the evenings or weekends. A group of residents said they wanted evening and weekend activities and activities that were more meaningful to them. One resident (Resident #46) reported feeling bored. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident activity preferences were assessed and/or document activity participation (Residents #8 and #47). The sample was 18. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Activity Evaluation policy, revised June 2018, showed: -In order to promote the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents, an activity evaluation is conducted and maintained for each resident at least quarterly and with any change of condition that could affect his/her participation in planned activities; -An activity evaluation is conducted as part of the comprehensive assessment to help develop an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents when the facility staff failed to provide oversight to residents who smoked as required per their smoking assessment, failed to ensure one resident had a smoking apron on when smoking per their smoking assessment, and failed to ensure the smoking blanket was available in the event of an emergency, for four residents sampled for smoking safety (Residents #30, #7, #22 and #6). The facility identified 11 residents who smoked. The survey team identified two additional residents who smoked. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Resident Smoking policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -This facility provides a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors and employees, including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to immediately conduct a complete investigation and implement interventions to protect the resident, after an allegation of resident to resident verbal abuse. This affected two residents (Residents #14 and #55). The census was 73. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised on 3/3/22, showed the following: -Under Section V, Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, showed an immediate investigation is warranted when a suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur; -Written procedures for investigations include: -Identifying staff responsible for the investigation; -Exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation (e.g., not tampering or destroying evidence); -Investigating different types of alleged violations; -Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and/or facility policy by failing to obtain blood pressures on dialysis days for one of five residents receiving dialysis, failed to ensure one resident's protein supplement, recommended by the Registered Dietician, was ordered timely and failed to ensure one resident had their wanderguard discontinued and ensure another resident with a wanderguard had their wanderguard assessment completed (Residents #210, #4, #57 and #11). The census was 63. 1. Review of Resident #210's admission record, dated 9/6/19, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included diabetes, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 9/1/19 through 9/30/19, showed: -An order, dated 2/8/19, for dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays; -An order, dated 2/8/19, to check and record blood pressure on dialysis days. Review of the resident's nursing medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of three unopened insulin pens were stored in the refrigerator until in use. The facility had two medication carts containing insulin. The census was 63. Review of the facility Storage of Medications policy, revised in April of 2007, showed the following: Policy Statement: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurse's station or other secured location. Medications must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. Observation on 10/17/19 at 12:06 P.M. of the 100/700 medication cart, showed five insulin pens. Three of the pens had been opened and were dated with the opening date. Two of the pens, belonging to two current residents, had not been opened. CMT O said he/she was not sure if unopened insulin pens should be stored in the refrigerator or not. Observation on 10/17/19 at 12:16 P.M., showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident admitted with reverse isolation precautions had a sign placed on the door alerting staff and or visitors to inquire with a nurse prior to entering the room (Resident #110). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their policy for infection control during two of three observations of residents receiving perineal care and one of one observation of staff completing a blood sugar check (accu-check) (Residents #10 and #41). The census was 63. 1. Review of the facility Isolation - Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions policy, revised on January 2012, showed the following: Transmission-Based Precautions may include Contact Precautions, Droplet Precautions, or Airborne Precautions; Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -When Transmission-Based Precautions are implemented, ensure that protective equipment (i.e., gloves, gowns, masks, etc.) is maintained near the resident's room so that everyone entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of abnormal lab results and failed to ensure nursing staff tracked a resident's bowel movements during the month preceding a hospitalization in which the resident (Resident #58) was found to have a fecal impaction, urinary tract infection and sepsis (blood infection). Additionally, the facility failed to assess and document a resident's vital signs in the resident's medical record, preceding the resident's hospitalization for a change in condition (Resident #16). The census was 63. 1. Review of Resident #58's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/27/19, showed: -admission date 9/1/11; -Severe cognitive impairment; -Rejection of care not exhibited; -Extensive assistance of one person required for bed mobility and transfers; -Total dependence of one person required for toilet use; -Indwelling catheter; -Always incontinent of bowel;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and documentation consistent with professional standards of practice for pressure ulcers acquired and after pressure ulcers were identified for one resident (Resident #41). The facility also failed to ensure dressings were replaced after being soiled or removed by the resident (Resident #6). The facility identified six residents with pressure ulcers. All six were sampled and problems were found with two. The census was 63. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment Policy, revised July 2017, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and identifications of residents at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries; -General Guidelines: Risk factors that increase a resident's susceptibility to develop or to not heal pressure ulcers include, but are not limited to: -Impaired/decreased mobility and decreased functional ability; -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained proper placement of an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder for purpose of continual urine drainage) and ensure a resident received the correct catheter size, as ordered by the physician. The facility identified four residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Of those four, all were selected for the sample and problems were found with one (Resident #58). The census was 63. Review of Resident #58's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/27/19, showed: -admission date 9/1/11; -Severe cognitive impairment; -Rejection of care not exhibited; -Extensive assistance of one person required for bed mobility and transfers; -Total dependence of one person required for toilet use; -Indwelling catheter; -Always incontinent of bowel; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem), dementia, multiple sclerosis, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater. Out of 31 opportunities observed, there were two errors, resulting in a 6.45% medication error rate (Residents #34 and #17). The census was 63. 1. Review of Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/6/19, showed the following: -Extensive assistance for bed mobility; -Diagnoses of high blood pressure, paraplegia (paralysis in the lower half of the body), anxiety and depression. Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS), dated 10/1/19 through 10/31/19, showed medication orders that included clonidine (medication given to treat high blood pressure) 0.25 milligrams (mg) as needed when the systolic blood pressure is greater than 150 (normal 120) or the diastolic blood pressure is greater than 90 (normal 80). Observation on 10/17/19 at 9:06 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$157,667 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $34,808 — penalty dated 2025-02-25
- $59,846 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
- $44,664 — penalty dated 2023-12-12
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-17 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VHS MO OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2023 |
| MILLER, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2023 |
| REDMAN RD CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/03/2025 |
| MAYLACK, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/23/2025 |
| PEEBLES, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/03/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $326K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265586. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.