Belleview Care Center
1616 Weisenborn Road, Saint Joseph, MO 64507 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (816) 749-3919 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $31,330 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 79.6% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.4% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 63.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.1% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 25.8% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.99 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.9%CMS range 35.6–59.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.3–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 23.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 6.2–14.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) was free from abuse when a staff member forcibly fed the resident his/her meal when the resident expressed he/she did not want to eat. The resident was visibly emotionally upset and tearful when describing the actions to staff. This affected one of six sampled residents (Resident #2). The facility census was 82. Review of the facility provided policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 8/22/22, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and if verified could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse; -Mistreatment means…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assure staff provided the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being for one of four sampled residents (Resident #3). Staff failed to monitor and assess the resident's blood glucose readings and administer insulin according to the physician's orders when Levemir insulin was ordered on 11/28/23 to be given subcutaneos daily at 8:00 P.M., The facility staff failed to give the resident the medication on 11/28/23 and 11/29/23, resulting in the resident being sent to the hospital with a critically elevated blood glucose level. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility provided policy Notification of Changes dated 9/1/21 showed: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician when there is a change requiring notification; -Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status that may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to assure an accurate accounting of resident trust fund accounts was sent to the resident or resident's representative, on a quarterly basis. This deficient paractice affected four of four sampled residents, (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4). The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's Transactions Involving Resident Funds or Property policy, dated 6/1/2023, showed:-It is the practice of this facility that any time there is a transaction involving residents, the resident must be provided with a receipt of such transaction;-Copies of each transaction are filed in the business office;-The facility will establish and maintain a system that assures a complete and separate accounting of each resident's personal funds and is according to generally accepted accounting principles;-The Business Office Manager (BOM) is responsible for ensuring that resident funds are reconciled on a monthly basis;-Discrepancies are promptly reported to the Administrator for investigation;-Quarterly statements will be provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one sampled resident, Resident #2, right to be free from physical abuse when Resident #1 used two hands and shoved Resident #2 to the floor. The facility census was 80. The Administrator was notified on 11/12/25 at 4:00 P.M. of the past noncompliance which began on 11/9/25. The facility staff immediately assessed and seperated Resident #2 and Resident #1, conducted an investigation, interviewed residents to ensure no others had been abused. All staff were re-trained on the facility abuse prevention policy and on monitoring residents with physical behaviors towards others. In-servicing was completed by 11/11/25. Resident #1 and #2's care plans were updated to reflect increased monitoring of both resident's whereabouts in proximity to one another. The noncompliance was corrected on 11/11/25. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 5/1/25, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident;- Abuse means the willful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect three residents right to be free from abuse when Resident #1 punched Resident #4 with a closed fist in the right shoulder and Resident #1 hit Resident #2 and Resident #3 with an open hand across the cheek. The facility's census was 82. On 03/27/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on 03/25/25. Upon discovery, the facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented. The noncompliance was corrected on 03/18/25. Review of the employee In-service sign in sheet showed staff received education on monitoring of individuals on the secure care unit, completed on 03/18/25. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 8/22/22, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to label and date all foods, discard expired food, keep daily logs for freezer temperature, test and record dishwasher chemical sanitizer levels, seal all foods after opening, use proper hand washing, and properly store food storage containers and dishes. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's Food Storage Policy, dated 8/12/23., showed: -All areas of food storage will be clean, dry, and maintained at temperatures as required to meet food safety requirements. -All open products will be sealed, wrapped and closed to ensure quality and prevent contamination against pests or rodents. -All outdated goods will be discarded the day after expiration date. -All temperatures log will be maintained and kept up to date. -All refrigerator and freezer logs will be maintained and kept up to date. Review of the facility's Sanitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff maintained residents rights, when providing ADL (activities of daily living) cares for cognitively impaired residents in a dignified manner when the facility staff failed to ensure facial hair was removed from three of the 18 sampled residents (Resident #11, Resident #64, and Resident #21) and additionally failed to honor the bathing preferences of one cognitively intact Resident, (Resident#16). The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated 09/01/22, showed: -The resident has a right to a safe, clean, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living. Review of the facility's Grooming Residents Facial Hair Policy, dated 09/01/21, showed: -It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with grooming facial hair to help maintain proper hygiene as per current standards of practice. - All resident's dignity will be maintained and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when the facility failed to maintain and replace pealing wallpaper, repair water stained ceilings, clean and replace broken furniture, repair scraped and missing paint from walls, replace broken window blinds, fix and repair loose headboards and foot boards on resident beds. and assure medical equipment is clean and stored away from residents in a common area. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's Physical Environment Space and Equipment policy, dated 9/1/21, showed an inspection of resident care equipment will be completed routinely and as needed to maintain safe operation condition. Review of the facility's Resident Right Policy, date 9/1/22., showed the resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, that supports daily living. 1. Observation of the memory care unit on 2/9/25 at 10:35 A.M., showed: - Two uncovered suction machines, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete peri care. This affected three of 18 sampled residents (Resident #10, #39 and #25). The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's policy, Activities of Daily Living, dated, 09/01/21, showed: -The facility will ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, dated 09/01/21, showed: -It is the practice of this facility to provide perineal care to all incontinent residents as needed to promote cleanliness, comfort, prevent infection and prevent skin breakdown; -Female: Separate the resident's skin folds with one hand and cleanse perineum, wiping front to back; -Repeat on opposite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being for three of the 18 sampled residents (#16, #47, and #48) when the facility failed to complete proper assessments, obtain a physician's order for medication to be administered to resident #47 by resident #48 and additionally failed to respect resident choice regarding showers for resident #16. The facility census was 82. The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 9/1/22, showed: -The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; -The resident has the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team determines that this practice is clinically appropriate; -The resident has the right to, and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication rate of less than five percent when facility staff made two medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of seven percent which affected two of the 18 sampled residents (Resident #14 and #18). The facility census was 82 Review of the facility's undated policy for medication administration showed, all medications will be administered to every resident by a licensed nurse or a Certified Medication Technician (CMT) and as ordered by a physician in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of eye drops. Review of the website, https://webmd.com, for artificial tears eye drops showed: - To avoid contamination, do not touch the dropper tip to the eye or or any other surface; - Tilt your head back, look up, and pull down the lower eyelid to make a pouch; - Place the dropper directly over the eye and squeeze out one or two drops as needed; 1. Review of Resident #14's Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable and attractive for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident #8 and #16). The facility had a census of 82. The facility did not provide a policy on food palatability and appearance. Observation on 2/11/25 at 12:46 P.M. showed: -Alfredo noodles tasted dry and bland; -The cream pie dessert had gritty texture and was tasteless. 1. Review of Resident #16's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 11/22/24, showed: -Resident was cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included: Debility (physical weakness), heart disease, diabetes (chronic high blood sugar), depression, and lung disease. During an interview on 2/10/25 at 8:26 A.M., Resident #16 said: -Sometimes food was served cold and raw; -They did not get the drinks that they ordered with their meals; During an interview on 2/10/25 at 3:19 P.M., Resident #16 said: -The way the way the food was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained essential equipment in a safe and operable working condition. Specifically, when the large walk-in freezer had been left with a build-up of ice on the freezer floor and on the ceiling of the walk-in freezer, which left the the walk in freezer with elevated temperatures for several days, while it was defrosting. This had the potential to affect all residents due to the health risks associated with serving foods that had been thawed for an unknown period of time. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on maintaining kitchen equipment. Observation on 2/09/25 at 10:12 A.M. showed: -Missing freezer temperature logs from 2/7 to 2/9; -A measurement of 20 inch by 30 inch and 1/4-inch-thick area of ice buildup on the freezer floor in front of the back wall of the walk in freezer; -Icicles and frost build up on ceiling under freezer fans; -Thermometer inside the freezer read 28 degrees Fahrenheit, rather than the 0 degrees Fahrenheit recommended by the FDA (Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure Resident #36 and Resident #79 had access to a call light while lying in bed to prevent potential accidents by allowing these residents to summon staff as needed. This affected two of the 18 sampled Residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the Facility's Call Light Policy- Accessibility and Timely Response, dated 09/1/21, showed: -Assurance that the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Cal lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. -Each resident will be evaluated for unique needs and preferences to determine any special accommodations that may be needed in order for the resident to utilize the call system. -Special accommodations will be identified on the plan of care and provided accordingly touchpads, larger buttons, bright colors. -With each interaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify the status of Resident #10's Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR, medical order that instructs the health care provider not to do resuscitative measures if a person's heart stops) when the resident signed the DNR authorizing no life saving measures be taken and also signed the revocation provision of the DNR, stating the resident wanted life saving measure to be taken. This affected one (Resident #10) of 18 sampled residents. The facilty census was 83. Review of the facilty's policy titled, Resident Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, dated, [DATE], showed: -This facilty supports the resident's right to request, discontinue or refuse treatment; -The facilty supports the resident's right to formulate an advance directive; -On admission it will be determined if the resident has executed an advance directive or would like to formulate one; -Periodically the facilty will identify and clarify if the resident would like to make any changes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice when staff failed to record the administration of medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one (Resident #13) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facilty's policy titled, Medication Administration, dated, 09/01/22, showed: -Medications are administered by legally authorized staff as ordered by the physician in accordance with professional standards of practice; -Sign the MAR after the medication has been administered; -Document any adverse effects or refusals. Review of the facilty's policy titled, Medical Provider Orders, dated, 04/07/22, showed staff should follow all medical provider orders. 1. Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 01/02/25, showed: -No cognitive impairment; -Dependent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and transfers; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Takes scheduled and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that two residents (Resident's #36 & #13) who needed respiratory care, was provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, when the facility staff failed to follow Physician orders for continuous oxygen therapy for Resident #36, and additionally, failed to assure that staff delivered a clean oxygen oxygen concentrator with oxygen tubing supplies for Resident #13. This affected two of the 18 sampled Residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the Facility's Medical Provider Orders Policy, dated 04/07/2022, showed: -It is the responsibility of all staff to follow all valid medical provider orders timely unless there is an emergency which would temporarily delay the implementation of the order. If the order is not followed the physician should be notified for clarification of the order. Review of the facility's Oxygen Policy, dated 9/1/21., showed staff are to be educated on oxygen safety precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe/functional/homelike environment, when the facility failed to recognize and repair a leak in one resident room and one adjacent utility room, causing water to run into the room, puddle on the floor and a mold like substance to form on the ceiling and bedroom walls and in the ceiling of the utility room on the Special Care Unit. Additionally, the facility failed to adequately maintain resident safety by preventing access to the affected area. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on wall maintenance or safety. Observation on 11/4/24 at 11:10 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: -The door was closed. There was no stop sign, wet floor sign, or do not enter sign; -The door knob turned easily, and the door swung open with little force; -The room had water running down the left side wall forming a large puddle approximately 6 feet across on the floor; -The left side wall had multiple dark,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of potential physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to officials in accordance with State law, including the Survey Agency for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 82 residents. Review of the facility provided policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 8/22/22, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and if verified could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse; -Mistreatment means inappropriate treatment of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to maintain documentation and complete a thorough investigation of an alleged violation of resident abuse after informed by a staff member that one resident (Resident #2) reported a certified nurse aide (CNA) force fed him/her. This affected one of six sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility provided policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 8/22/22, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and if verified could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse; -Mistreatment means inappropriate treatment of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assure staff followed acceptable standards of practice for one sampled resident (Residents #4) when staff did not notify the physician the resident was not taking his/her physician prescribed tacrolimus medication (an antirejection medication used after an organ transplant to ensure the body does not reject the donated organ). The facility census was 80. Review of the facility provided policy Medication Administration dated 9/1/22 showed: -Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturers guidelines -Report and document any adverse side effects or refusals Review of the facility provided policy Notification of changes dated 9/1/21 showed: -The purpose is to ensure the facility promptly consults the residnet's physician when there is a change requiring notification -Circumstances requiring notification include: significant change in the resident's physical,mental or psychological condition that may include life threatening conditions or clinical complications. Review of the Federal Drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment by not maintaining the ceilings in the memory care unit. This has the potential to affect all residents who reside on the memory care unit, 22 residents. The faciilty census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy regarding maintaining the environment. Observations of the memory care unit on 3/20/24 at 1:50 P.M., showed: -A square, open hole, approximately 24 inches square, in the ceiling of the hall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. -A square, open hole, approximately 24 inches square, in the ceiling of area near the nurses' station. -Two square holes, approximately 12 inches square, covered with plastic sheeting, in the ceiling of the area leading from the nurses station to the dining area. -Five circular holes, approximately six inches in diameter, filled with plastic sheeting, in the ceiling of the area leading from nurses station to the dining area. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility staff failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner when four of eight residents (Resident #5, #6, #7, #8) had greasy, disheveled hair, body odor, and were wearing hospital gowns mid morning on 12/25/23. The facility census was 82. Review of the resident dignity policy dated 9/1/21 showed: - All staff members are involved in providing the residents care to promote and maintain resident dignity; - Staff were to groom and dress residents according to resident preference. Review of the resident showers policy dated 9/1/21 showed: - It is the practice of the facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain hygiene; - Residents will be provided showers per request or as the facility protocol; - Partial baths may be given between regular showers. Review of the resident rights policy dated 2021 showed the resident as the right to be treated with dignity. 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when licensed nurse staff failed to ensure that physician's orders were carried out for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) when blanks were left in the medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR). This affected four of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Review of facility charting and documentation policy, dated 7/17, showed: -All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, and any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. -The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: - Objective observations; - Medications administered; -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner which affected three of 14 sampled residents, (Resident #10, #25 and #53) and failed to monitor Resident #15 to ensure he/she did not disrobe in public areas. The facility census was 56. Review of the resident's rights policy, revised 9/1/22, showed in part: - The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language that the resident understands of his/her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility; - The facility will ensure that all staff members are educated on the rights of residents and the responsibility of the facility to properly care for its residents; - The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; - The resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to consider concerns and recommendations from the resident council members and failed to communicate with the resident council regarding concerns as reported by four residents who participated in a group interview. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated policy for resident and family grievances showed, in part: - It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal; - Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgment of a complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance; - The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances: issuing written grievance decisions to the resident counsel; and coordinating with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility operator failed to ensure that residents had access to their funds for one resident (Resident #17) when the resident's daughter was unable to obtain available funds from the resident's account in order to take the resident out for shopping for two weeks. This had the potential to affect all residents the facility holds funds for. The facility census was 56 Review of the undated resident funds policy showed: - The facility will maintain a resident's personal funds that do not exceed $100 in a non-interest bearing account, interest bearing account or petty cash; - Residents whose care is funded by Medicaid will deposit the resident's personal funds in excess of $50 in an interest bearing account separate from the facility's operating accounts, and that credits all interest earned on residents' funds to that account. Review of the undated resident rights policy showed: - The resident had the right to manage his/her financial affairs; - This included the right to know, in advance, what charges a facility may impose against a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they established and maintained a system that ensured a full, complete and separate accounting according to accepted accounting principles and failed to establish a system that accurately provided residents with a true accounting of their statement balances and monies owed to the facility for services, which caused residents to believe their housing costs where covered, when they actually were not and the residents spent their social security checks, which should have been used for their rent to the facility. Additionally, these residents are not able to pay their rent by way of debit card, they have no access to cash, or check, and this had a negative emotional impact on two residents (Residents #25 & #51) when they worried they would now be kicked out of the facility for not paying their rent. The facility census was 56. Review of the Resident Personal Funds Policy, revised on 4/10/23., showed: - The resident has a right to manage his or her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they informed residents of their rights periodically during the resident's stay both orally and in writing. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy on Resident Rights dated 9/1/22 showed: - The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language that the resident understands of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility; - The policy did not specifically indicate when rights should be communicated with the residents. During the resident council meeting and interview with surveyors on 8/28/23 at 10:27 A.M., all four residents in attendance said: - Resident rights are not discussed at any of the resident council meetings; - No written documentation regarding resident rights is given at resident council meetings. During an interview on 8/30/23 at 9:37 A.M., the Activities Director said: - He/she has only been employed for a couple of weeks and has only been able to attend one resident council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure they followed their policy when they failed to indicate residents' wishes and document the residents' choice of code status in such a way to be readily accessible and understandable to staff in the event of an emergency. This affected three of 14 sampled residents (Residents #8, #3, and #209). The facility census was 24. Review of the facility's Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives policy revised [DATE] showed: - It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive; - On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive; - Upon admission, should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for all residents on the secured memory unit when the staff did not keep rooms clean, floors throughout the unit clean and in good repair, doors and walls in all the hallways and in resident rooms scuffed with missing paint. Additionally the unit, lacks a homelike environment with no decor, and has furniture being actively used by residents that is in need a replacement or repair. The facility census was 56. A housekeeping policy was not provided. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy., dated 9/1/22 showed: -The resident has the right to a dignified existence. Observation of the memory unit on 8/27/23 at 10:22 A.M., showed: - The doors entering into the secured memory unit have papers taped to cover the windows so the residents can look out. These doors on both sides have missing paint. - One open area that is not being used by residents has floor striped and waxed recently. - The floors of the unit have dirty wax build up and sticky…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible parties and the reasons for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood. The notice should include the effective date of discharge or transfer the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and electronic mail), telephone number of the entity which receives requests and information on how to obtain the appeal form and assistance in completing and submitting it; the name, address (mailing and electronic mail) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and for residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing, electronic mail (e-mail) address and telephone number of the agency for protection and advocacy for individuals with mental disorders established under the Protection and Advocacy for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care which included measurable objectives and time frame's for two out of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #209 and Resident #25). The facility staff failed to implement any comprehensive person-centered plan of care that addressed the needs for resident #209 and failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #25's diagnosis of a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder that develops in some people who have experienced a shocking, scary, or dangerous event). The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy dated, 9/1/21 showed: - The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care; - A baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission; - The care plan will include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they provided care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of quality when nursing staff failed to follow physician orders by not ensuring they applied tubi grips daily in the morning for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident #8) and failed to obtain an order to provide oxygen therapy for two of 14 sampled residents who were observed on oxygen (Resident #3 and #209). The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders policy, revised 4/7/22, showed: - The facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders; - Medications and/or treatments should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe; - Verbal orders should be received only by licensed nurses, or pharmacists, and confirmed in writing by the medical provider, on the next visit to the facility; - Needed elements of the medication and/or treatment order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of 14 sampled residents who required staff assistance (Residents #8, #10, #11, #25, and #53), were provided with adequate assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's: tasks completed to care for oneself daily such as bathing, dressing, moving from a chair to bed, and personal hygiene), as well as failed to provide appropriate incontinent care for residents (#25 and #53) and failed to provide showers to maintain personal hygiene for all five of the identified residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Activity of Daily Living Policy, dated 9/1/21., showed: - The facility will ensure a resident's abilities in ADL's (Activity of daily living) do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. - The facility will ensure the resident's ADL needs are met. - This includes the resident's ability to bathe, dress ,and groom., transfer and ambulate; toilet; eat and use speech to communicate. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review , the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities to meet the interests and well-being of the residents who reside in the facilities secured memory care unit. This affected all of the memory care residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facilities Activity Policy, dated 9/1/21., showed: - It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences of each resident. Facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of each resident, as well as encourage both independence and interaction within the community. - Activities will be designed to enhance quality of life, well-being, belonging, promote or enhance physical activity, emotional health, dignity, and self esteem. During an observation on 8/27/23 at 10 am, and 2 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care for five of 14 sampled residents (Residents #3, #33, #47, #110, and #209) when staff failed to: effectively clean oxygen concentrator filter area, properly install oxygen concentrator filter, properly label and date oxygen concentrator oxygen tubing, properly label and date oxygen concentrator tubing setup bags, have physician's orders for oxygen administration, clean a nebulizer mask, and failed to comprehensively care plan the use of oxygen therapy. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated oxygen administration policy showed: - Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences; - Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such case, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents by failing to: provide showers for four of the 14 sampled residents, (Residents #8, #10, #11 and #25). The facility also failed to provide care in a timely manner to Resident #25, resulting in him/her being left waiting on bed pan for an extended period of time. The facility also failed to ensure reasonable response times to call lights, resulting in extended call light wait times, which affected the four residents who attended the resident group interview. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated policy on Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy showed: - It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made three medication errors out of 27 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 11%, which affected two sampled residents, (Resident #4, #25). The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated Insulin Pen policy., showed: - It is the policy of this facility to use insulin pens in order to improve the accuracy of insulin dosing, provide increased resident comfort, and serve as a teaching aid to prepare residents for self-administration of insulin therapy upon discharge. - Insulin pens will be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the insulin reservoir. - Prior to attaching the needle to the pen, remove the pen cap, wipe the rubber seal with an alcohol pad then screw the pen needle onto the insulin pen, twist open and remove outer cover from the pen needle. -Prime the insulin pen by dialing 2 units by the dose selector clockwise, with the needle pointing up,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff discarded expired stock medication stored in the medication room, failed to ensure there was no food in the medication refrigerator, failed to ensure opened insulin pens and vials were dated, failed to ensure food and medications where not stored together and failed to ensure medication refrigeration was monitored for appropriate temperatures. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy dated, 9/1/21., showed: - It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medication housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. - All stored medications will be routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels. These medications are to be destroyed. - Refrigerated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. When the facility allowed dirty, black substance stained linens to be placed in resident care areas for staff and residents use, failed to monitor linens upon delivery to the clean linen rooms by the laundry staff, failed to ensure that residents, and staff had immediate access to incontinent adult briefs. This affected three of the 14 samples residents (Resident #17, #11, #53), and failed to monitor staff on appropriate hand washing and peri care processes for two of sampled 14 residents (Resident #4 and #53 ) As well as additionally failed ensure that new staff had completed a Tuberculin skin test prior to working. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of Resident #209 when they failed to provide a chair of sufficient size and structure to accommodate the stature of the resident. Resident #209 was one out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated Accommodation of Needs policy showed: - The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and will evaluate and make reasonable accommodations for the individual needs and preferences of a resident, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered; - The facility will make reasonable accommodations to individualize the resident's physical environment including their personal bathroom and bedroom and the common living areas within the facility; - Facility staff shall make efforts to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of the resident as they make use of their physical environment; - Based on individual needs and preferences, the facility will assist the resident in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure they completed a Criminal Background Check (CBC) for one staff member (Certified Nurse Aide B), and the Missouri Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for eight staff members (Certified Nurse Aides B, C, D, and E); Nurse Aides A, B, C, and D) of the eight sampled staff members. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, dated January 2019, showed: -Each center will follow any and all state specific requirements. -Potential team members shall, at a minimum, have the following screenings checks conducted: appropriate licensing board or registry check and criminal background check pursuant to company policy or state law. -The center will not retain any team member with a history of abuse or neglect if that information is known to the center. -The center must not employ or otherwise engage individuals who have had a disciplinary action taken against a professional license by a state licensure body of had a finding entered into the state NA registry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-12 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents and their responsible party and the reason for the transfer/discharge in writing in a language they understood. This affected three of the seventeen sampled residents. (Residents #12, #30 and # 58). The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's transfer and discharge policy, dated November 1, 2016 showed in part: Before Diversicare transfers or discharges the Resident, it shall notify the Resident and the Resident's Representative of the basis for the transfer or discharge in a language and manner they understand; and will also notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The Notice of Transfer shall include the information required under the law, including the Resident's appeal rights, and shall be provided at least 30 days before the proposed date of transfer or discharge unless sooner notice is permitted. Notice may be made as soon as practicable before a transfer or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-12 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and the resident's family/legal representative of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer/discharge to the hospital. This affected three of the seventeen sampled residents. (Residents # 12, # 30, and # 58). The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's bed hold policy dated November 1, 2016 includes: - The facility will, in accordance, with Federal and State regulations, hold a Resident's bed during a temporary hospitalization or therapeutic leave. - Before the Center transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes on a therapeutic leave, the facility shall provide the resident or his or her representative the bed hold policy. 1. Review of Resident #12's quarterly minimum data set (a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -BIMS score 12. This indicates moderate cognitive impairment. -Resident is a two person assist and requires assistance with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and updated as needed to reflect urinary catheters (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag), oxygen, depression, and anticoagulants (blood thinner). This affected three residents (Resident #44, #24, and #47). Facility census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy for care plans. The Director of Nursing (DON) referred to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance regarding care plans. 1. Review of Resident #44's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 12/2/21, showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score 15. This indicates no cognitive impairment. -Diagnosis include: stroke, coronary artery disease (when the major blood vessels that supply your heart become damaged or diseased), hemiplegia or hemiparesis (Hemiparesis is a mild or partial weakness or loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided respiratory care to two residents (Residents #24 and 58) as ordered by the physician, and failed to properly maintain clean portable oxygen concentrator tubing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Facility census was 67. The facility did not have a policy regarding following physician orders. The facility did not have a policy regarding respiratory care. Review of the facility policy, Oxygen Tubing, not dated, did not address storage of tubing when not in use. 1. Review of Resident #24's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) dated 11/16/21, showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) not done. This indicates severe cognitive impairment. -On oxygen therapy. -Diagnosis include: non-traumatic brain dysfunction, dementia, and anxiety. During an observation on 01/03/22 at 11:27 A.M. showed: -Oxygen on via nasal cannula at three liters. During an observation on 1/11/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week who was not the Director of Nursing (DON). The facility maintained a census of greater than 60 residents and this deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 67. The facility did not have a policy regarding staff scheduling related to RN coverage. Review of facility staffing sheets showed no RN coverage, other than the DON, on the following days: -12/19/21, -11/7/21, -11/27/21, -11/28/21, -10/10/21, -10/24/21. During an interview on 1/5/22 at 3:00 P.M. the DON, Assistant DON, and the Administrator said: -The DON is utilized to provide RN coverage. -They were not aware that DON could not serve as the RN coverage due to average daily census over 60. During an interview on 1/6/22 at 3:30 P.M. the Administrator said: -He/She was unaware that the DON could not serve as the RN coverage requirement with a census of 60 and above. -He/She submits reports for staffing through corporate and no one in corporate has ever said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when staff failed to ensure catheter bags were kept from touching the floor for one resident (Resident #47), failed to ensure staff conducted hand hygiene during peri-care for one resident (Resident #50), and failed to ensure two staff members screened for COVID symptoms prior to working with residents (Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) F and CNA G). Facility census was 67. 1. Review of facility audit tool for Indwelling Catheters, undated, did not address catheter bags touching the floor. The facility did not provide any other catheter related policy. Review of Resident #47's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 12/8/21, showed: -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) not completed. This was due to severe cognitive impairment. -Always incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received treatment as ordered for two residents (Resident #12 and #50) and services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #12). The facility census was 67. Review of facility policy, Skin Care Guidelines, dated July 2018, showed: -All those admitted will be observed for baseline skin condition and evaluated for risk of skin breakdown. -Weekly review of the resident's skin will be completed by the nurse and documented in the medical record. -Residents will be observed by nurse aide team members daily for changes in skin condition. Changes will be reported to the licensed nurse and documented in the medical record. -Director of nursing or designee will be responsible to implement and monitor the skin integrity program. -The plan of care will address problem, goals, and interventions directed toward the prevention of pressure ulcers in those at risk and for any skin integrity concerns identified. -When an open area is identified: document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff documented post-fall evaluations when one resident (Resident #121) suffered multiple falls. Facility census was 67. Review of facility policy, Falls, not dated, showed: -Post fall: the patient is physically assessed for injuries and medical attention rendered as needed; the physician and resident's representative are notified of the fall; the post fall evaluation is completed to assist in developing interventions to prevent future falls; the interdisciplinary team reviews post fall investigations and summarizes recommendations for interventions. Review of Resident #121's admission minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 11/18/21, showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3. This indicates severe cognitive impairment. -One staff assist for walking and locomotion. -Diagnosis include Alzheimer's disease. -Falls marked in the care area assessment. -No falls since admission. -History of a fall within the last month prior to admission. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to monitor for weight loss for one resident (Resident #50). Facility census was 67. Review of facility policy, Weight Loss Interventions, dated December 2010, showed: -Nutritional supplements will be provided as ordered when supplements are required to maintain nutritional adequacy and/or when resident suffers from weight loss and other means of improving nutrition and/or intake. -When a resident loses three percent of more in one month, or is significantly below ideal/usual body weight, the following steps shall be taken: if the weight is questionable, re-weigh the resident; review causes for poor consumption during the weekly focus meeting; when contributing factors have been identified, appropriate interventions will be implemented; the resident will be weighed weekly for four weeks; -If weight has not stabilized or if the resident has lost five percent in one month, 7.5% in three months, or ten percent in six months,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist one resident (Resident #50) in obtaining dental care. Facility census was 67. The facility did not have a policy to address Dental Services. Review of Resident #50's significant change minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 12/15/21, showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15. This indicates no cognitive impairment. -Diagnosis include: cirrhosis (chronic liver damage leading to scarring and liver failure), renal failure, urinary tract infection (UTI, last thirty days), diabetes, thyroid disorder, fracture, cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture, due to an abnormal brain development), and depression. -No swallowing disorder. No or unknown weight loss. -No dental concerns. During an interview and observation on 1/3/22 at 2:00 P.M. the resident said: -He/she has bad teeth, some bottom teeth missing, loose teeth on the top and bottom. -The CPAP machine dries up his/her mouth and his/her teeth hurt.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$31,330 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $9,225 — penalty dated 2025-02-20
- $22,105 — penalty dated 2024-11-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-10 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VHS MO OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2023 |
| VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2023 |
| VHS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2023 |
| VHS ULTIMATE PARENT LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2023 |
| MILLER, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2023 |
| WEISENBORN ROAD CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/15/2025 |
| ABBAS, MARGHOOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/15/2024 |
| MUTUKU, MERCY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/12/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $280K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265827. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.