No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avalon View Health And Wellness

1200 West College Street, Liberty, MO 64068 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (816) 781-3020 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 781-3020 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)$14,267 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,267 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-23)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
9 Victory Dr · (816) 792-1809 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1170 W Kansas St · (816) 736-4232 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
114 S Stewart Rd · (816) 335-4190 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.5%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.5%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.0%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.4%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.7%63.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.0%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%13.7%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.082.111.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.022.331.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 8.5–17.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 4.6–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
54.0%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 118.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.98 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-19)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the registered nurse working as the charge nurse had a current nursing license. The facility census was 129. On [DATE], the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on [DATE]. On [DATE] facility administration was notified of the incident, an investigation immediately began, and corrective actions were implemented to include; complete audit of all employee files to ensure all staff licenses are current and complete audit of all resident's medical records. All residents were interviewed, and no concerns were noted. The Administrator now reviews all potential new staff hires to ensure all required licenses are current. The noncompliance was corrected on [DATE].The facility did not provide a policy and procedure regarding licenses verification.Review of the facility's undated Registered Nurse Job Description showed:-The Registered Nurse (RN) is responsible for ensuring the delivery of efficient and effective nursing care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow one resident (Resident #1) to exercise his/her rights when funds were transferred from Resident #1's personal checking account to the Business Office Manager's (BOM) personal [NAME] account ( a mobile banking application used to transfer funds from one account to another) without Resident #1's permission. The facility census was 117. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy dated 09/01/21 showed:-The resident had the right to a dignified existence and self-determination;-The resident had the right to exercise his/her rights as a resident of the facility;-The resident had the right to be free from interference and coercion from the facility in exercising his/her rights;-The resident had the right to manage his/her financial affairs;-The resident had the right to know in advance what charges the facility may impose against the resident's personal funds. Review of the facility's Transactions Involving Resident Funds or Property Policy dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy and physician orders to implement contact precautions and infection control measures to prevent the spread of scabies for three of three sampled residents, on the special care unit, (Resident #1, #2, and #3). All residents of the special care unit had to be prophylactically treated with 18mg Ivermectin by mouth, and Permethrin topically and showered. The facility census was 118.Review of the facilities policy titled, Identification and Management of Scabies, showed:-Affected residents should remain on contact precautions until 24 hours after treatment;-A resident sharing a room with someone infected with scabies should be examined carefully for scabies and should be treated if signs and symptoms are present, if symptoms are not present daily assessments should be made until the case has resolved;-Individuals who come into contact with the infected resident or with potentially contaminated bedding or clothing should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff invoked (activated by verifying incapacity of the resident to make decisions) Durable [NAME] of Attorney (DPOA) prior to allowing the designated agent to make medical decisions for the resident. The facility also failed to ensure two residents had designated individuals to make medical decisions when the resident was declared incapacitated by two physicians. This affected seven of eleven sampled residents (Residents #33, #48, #53, #63, #73, and #95). The facility census was 111.Review of the facility's Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives Policy, dated 2021, showed:-It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advanced directive. -Advanced directive is defined as a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment for one (Resident #1) of five sampled residents remained free of accident hazards and additionally failed to follow their own transportation policy when the resident was injured during transportation in facility vehicle as a result of not being properly restrained and supervised by the facility designated driver. The facility census was 111.Review of the facility's Transportation Driving Safety Policy, dated reviewed on 08/10/24, showed:- It is the drivers responsibility to operate the vehicle in a safe manner and to drive defensively to prevent injuries and property damage;- Drivers of company vans, buses, or vehicles carrying patients should have at least three years of driving experience and will be required to complete initial and annual training per manufacturers guidelines to include how to properly restrain a wheelchair and use of safety mechanisms for residents in wheelchairs per manufacturers guidelines and van safety;- The driver shall ensure each passenger is properly restrained to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from physical abuse when Resident #2 hit Resident #1 in the back. Resident #1 was noted to have redness to his/her back. The facility census was 108. On 4/2/25 the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on 3/24/25. Upon discovery, the facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented. The noncompliance was corrected on 3/24/25. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 8/22/2022, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior throughout the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure furnishings were in good repair. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility provided policy Routine Cleaning and Disinfection dated 9/1/21 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment; -Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces; -Horizontal surfaces with infrequent hand contact (window sills and hard surface flooring) in routine areas should be cleaned on a regular basis; when soiling or spills occur; when a resident is discharged ; -Cleaning of walls, blinds and window curtains will be conducted when visibly soiled. Review of the facility provided, undated, policy Safe and Homelike Environment included, in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to dependent residents with grooming, and showers at least twice a week for nine of 21 sampled residents (Resident #12, #13, #14 #49, #67, #74, #80, #87, and #91). The facility failed to provide shaving assistance and nail care for one resident (Resident #14). The facility failed to provide incontinent care for two residents (Resident #13 and #80). The facility census was 104 Review of facility policy, Activities of Daily Living, dated 9/1/21, showed: -The facility will ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable including ability to bathe, dress, groom, and toilet. -The facility shall provide a maintenance and restorative program to assist the resident in maintaining the highest practicable outcome based on the comprehensive assessment. -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support the needs of three of 21 sampled residents (Resident #153, #93, and #52). The facility census was 104. Review of the facility provided policy, Activities, dated 9/1/21 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences of each resident. Facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of and support the physical,mental and psychological well being of each resident. -Activities refer to any endeavor, other than routine ADLs(Activities of Daily Living: tasks completed in a day to care for oneself, such as using the toilet, bathing, nail care, brushing hair and teeth.)in which the resident participates that is intended to enhance his/her sense of well being and to promote or enhance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified activity professional to oversee the activity program for the facility. The designated employee was employed as the full time activity director for one year, however, had not completed an approved activity professional training program. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's Activity Director Qualifications, dated 2023, showed: -Activity Director, at a minimum, shall meet the following qualifications: -Licensed or registered by the state in which practicing; -One or more of the following: -Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October 1, 1990; -Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 year, one of which was full-time in a therapeutic activities program; -Is a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or -Has completed a training course approved by the state; -Qualifications shall be verified prior to hire as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment for three of 21 sampled residents (Resident #3, #67, and #89) was free from accident hazards when observations of the memory care unit showed residents had access to the unlocked clean utility room that contained three open electrical boxes, two tanks of oxygen, and cleaning supplies, and the unlocked biohazard room that contained sharps, as well as hazardous chemicals, and the unlocked area behind the nurses desk that contained a jug of drug destroyer and a bottle of multipurpose cleaner. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's Accidents and Supervision Policy, dated, 9/1/2021, showed in part: -The resident's environment will remain free of accident hazards as is possible; -Each resident will receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents; -This includes - Identifying hazards and risks; - Evaluating and analyzing hazards and risks; - Implementing interventions to reduce hazards and risks; - Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. -All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had water at bedside that was easily accessible for four of 23 residents sampled (#90 #49, #87, and #12). The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's undated policy for hydration showed, in part: -The facility offers each resident sufficient fluid, including water and other liquids, consistent with resident needs and preferences to maintain proper hydration and health. - Nursing staff shall assess hydration status upon admission and throughout the resident's stay in accordance with assessment protocols; the dietary manager or designee shall obtain the resident's beverage preferences upon admission, significant change in condition, and periodically throughout his or her stay; the dietician will assess hydration as part of the comprehensive nutritional assessment within 72 hours of admission, annually, and upon significant change in condition. -The assessment shall clarify the resident's current hydration status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide trauma informed care to one sampled resident (Resident #49) with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a traumatic event). The facility failed to mitigate triggers of loud noises that caused re-traumatization for one resident (Resident #49) who was residing on a hall with several residents who scream and yell out. The failed to identify and mitigate triggers for one resident (Resident #87) when the resident had identified several traumatic events. The facility also failed to identify and communicate interventions to staff for both residents to assist in promoting a sense of safety for both residents (Resident #49 and #87). The facility census was 104. Review of facility policy, Trauma Informed Care, dated 9/1/22, showed: -It is policy of facility to provide care and services which are delivered using approaches which are culturally-competent, account for experiences and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet basic care needs for seven residents (Residents #13, #67, #80, #12, #49, #87, and #74) including assistance to reposition and incontinent care for two residents (Resident #13 and #80), failed to provide basic hygiene for one resident (Resident #67), and failed to provide assistance with bathing for three residents (Residents #12, #49 and #87) of 21 sampled residents. Additionally the facility failed to answer call lights timely for nine of 20 Resident Council attendees. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility provided policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs: tasks completed in a day to care for oneself) dated 9/1/21 showed: -A resident who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the facility provided policy Bathing a Resident dated 9/1/21 showed: -It is the practice of this facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for five (Resident #12,#15, #69, #77 and #154 ) out of 23 sampled residents when the facility failed to store medications in a locked storage area for Resident #12 and Resident #154 and failed to ensure medications were inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents when the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff were able to read the pharmacy label for Resident #69, failed to destroy expired medications for Resident #69 and Resident #77, and failed to destroy expired house stock medications. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, revised, 9/1/21, showed in part: - It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications will be stored according to the manufacturers recommendation and securely; - All drugs and biologicals will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately staff the kitchen with enough dietary staff to ensure meals were served to residents in a timely manner. This has the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 104. 1. Review of facility's meal serving policy, dated 12/2/22, showed: -Check on the resident's at regular intervals; -Offer additional fluids and water with the meal when there are no fluid restrictions; Facility did not provide a policy regarding dietary staffing. Review of the facility's planned meal time schedule dated 9/15-9/28/24, showed: -Breakfast 7:30 A.M. -Lunch 11:30 A.M. -Dinner 5:00 P.M. Observations on 9/16/24 showed the following: -11:47 A.M., 19 residents assembled in the dining room for the lunch meal; The dining room had only a few chairs, no place settings, no condiments, no silverware, or centerpieces to indicate a home like environment for the meal time dining experience; -12:10 P.M., Residents received packets of cream and sugar from staff eight minutes after being served coffee, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food served to the residents was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature when staff did not temperature check cooked foods and recipes were not followed for five (#27, #49, #90, #91, and #96) of 21 sampled residents. In addition, 15 of 20 residents from the resident council group interview said the food was cold and recipes were not followed. The facility census was 104. 1. Review of the facility policy, on Palatability and Nutritive Value, dated 6/27/23, showed: - Hot foods will be held at temperature 135 degrees or above and cold foods will be held at 41 degrees or below prior to serving to maintain food safety; - Best efforts will be made to present hot food hot and cold foods cold at point of service by using thermal lids and bases, heated or chilled plates and thermal pellets as necessary; - Food service staff will monitor palatability of food at point of service by periodic test tray evaluation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to manually clean and sanitize kitchen equipment, failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, failed to wash hands, failed to date and label foods, and failed to wear hair and beard coverings. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 104. 1. Review of the facility's policy on three compartment sinks, undated, showed: - Dishes and cookware will be cleaned and sanitized after each meal; - Check sanitation sink frequently using a test strip to ensure the level of sanitizing solution is appropriate; - Sink One Wash: Prepare the clean sink by measuring the appropriate amount of water into the sink and marking the sink with a water line. Determine the appropriate amount of detergent to be used. Water should be 110 F. Change water frequently to ensure effective cleaning of dishes; - Sink Two Rinse: Prepare the clean sink with hot water; - Sink Three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain all areas of the facility in a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for visitors, staff and residents. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility provided policy Routine Cleaning and Disinfection dated 9/1/21 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment. -Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces. -Horizontal surfaces with infrequent hand contact (window sills and hard surface flooring) in routine areas should be cleaned on a regular basis; when soiling or spills occur; when a resident is discharged . -Cleaning of walls, blinds and window curtains will be conducted when visibly soiled. Review of the facility provided, undated, policy Safe and Homelike Environment included, in accordance with resident rights the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Observations beginning on 09/16/24 at 12:58 P.M. on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect, when staff failed to cover up a resident (Resident #71) who was walking down the hallway in a white pull-up brief, without pants, and failed to assist a resident into his/her personal clothes when requested by the resident (Resident # 74). The facility also failed to provide a resident with clean bed pads and sheets so he/she could return to bed after an incontinent episode (Resident #49). This affected two of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide a policy on resident dignity. Review of nursing home Resident's Rights, showed: -Residents had a right to be treated with consideration, respect, dignity, and recognizing each resident's individuality. -Equal access to quality of care; -Quality of life is maintained or improved. 1. Review of Resident #71's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds after business hours and on the weekends. This impacted three of 21 sampled residents (Resident #83, #28, and #5). The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide a policy regarding access to resident funds. 1. Review of Resident #83's Significant change minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 7/26/24, showed: -He/She had moderately impaired cognition; -He/She had clear speech, was able to make self-understood and understand others; -Diagnoses included depression, cancer of the colon, high blood pressure, and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). During an interview on 9/16/24 at 12:20 P.M., the resident said: -He/She does not always have access to his/her money; -The facility said that they had not gone to the bank, so they did not have money to give him/her. 2. Review of Resident #28's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -He/She had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status matched in all places of the clinical record for one resident (Resident #35) out of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 104. The facility's Advance Directive policy was not provided. 1. Review of Resident #35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/17/24 showed: Diagnoses included: mild cognitive impairment; Diabetes; Kidney Failure; High Blood Pressure; Gastroesophoageal reflux disease (GERD); and Obstructive uropathy (urinary blockage) Review of resident's physician's orders, dated 7/16/2024, showed: -Full code (Provide life saving measures) status. Review of the resident's Outside the Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Order form (OHDNR) signed on 8/22/24 showed: -Code status as a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Review of resident's undated care plan showed: -Resident was a full code status. During an interview on 09/23/24 at 10:16 A.M, certified nurse aide (CNA) A said the resident's code status is in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of records was maintained for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident #80 and #153) when durable power of attorney document (DPOA) paperwork for Resident #80 was given to an unauthorized person by facility staff and when empty medication packaging was observed outside the facility on the ground with Resident #153's personal information on the label. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Policy dated, 9/1/21, showed in part: -It is the facility's policy to implement reasonable an appropriate measures to protect and maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the resident's identifiable information or records; -Security measures will be implemented to manage risks and vulnerabilities. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy revised, 9/1/22 did not address the residents right to privacy and confidentiality. Review of the Missouri Resident [NAME] of Rights, provided through the state long term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for two sampled residents (Resident #153 and #52 ) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility provided policy Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 9/1/21 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident; to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs identified in the resident's assessment. -The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum: services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing; Any specialized services; and the resident's goals. 1. Review of Resident #153 Initial Activity Assessment completed on 11/8/21 showed he/she liked: -visits with family/friends; -poker; -gardening/outdoor activity; -movies/tv; -music/talk radio; -pet visits; -smoking.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders and apply a resident's cervical collar (neck brace) as ordered daily for one resident (Resident #52) who was dependent upon staff for mobility and assistance with care. This affected one of twenty-one sampled residents. The facility census was 104. Review of facility policy, provision of physician ordered services, dated 2022, included professional standards of quality means that care and services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice. 1. Review of Resident #52's admission minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 7/26/24, showed: -His/Her cognitive status was not testable; -He/She had no speech; -He/She rarely or never understand others; -He/She had limited range of motion in upper and lower extremities on both sides; -He/She was dependent on a wheelchair for mobility; -He/She was dependent for all cares and mobility; -He/She had applications of ointments/medications for pressure ulcer; -He/She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent flies and roaches. The facility census was 114. Review of the facility provided Pest Control Policy dated 9/1/22 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents -The facility will utilize a variety of methods in controlling certain seasonal pests, i.e. flies. These will involve indoor and outdoor methods that are deemed appropriate by the pest service and state and federal regulations. Observations beginning on 09/16/24 at 12:58 P.M. on [NAME] Hall showed: -Large cobwebs with dead bugs at the corner of the exit door. -Multiple flies in room B1. Review of Resident #52's admission minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 7/26/24, showed: -His/Her cognitive ability was not testable; -He/She had no speech; -He/She rarely or never understand others; -He/She had limited range of motion in upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Please refer to Event ID 45RI12 for additional details. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to preserve and enhance residents' dignity when staff did not ensure call lights were within reach for three residents(Residents #100, #9, and #40), when staff did not respond to call lights timely for one resident (Resident #19), and when staff moved two residents' personal belongings without them being present (Resident #7 and #58). This affected seven of 28 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, revised 9/1/22, showed: -The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. -The right to receive services and/or items included in the plan of care; -The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity; -The resident has a right to make choices about aspects of his or her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event 45RI12 for SOD. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, please see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 12/14/23. Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when staff failed to keep all areas of resident rooms and hallways clean, did not keep trash picked up off the floor, keep floors free of dirt and grime, and wipe down over-bed tables. The facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to extent possible; -Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces and is normally accomplished manually or mechanically using water and detergents or enzymatic products. 1. Observation on [NAME] hall on 2/5/24 at 8:05 A.M., showed: -Spilled coffee and brown fecal material on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to SOD at 45RI12 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 12/14/23. Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide dressing, shaving, grooming, and bathing assistance for four of 26 sampled residents (Residents #3, 100, #19, and #33). The facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 9/1/21, showed: -The facility will ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable; -The facility shall provide a maintenance and restorative program to assist the resident in achieving and maintaining the highest practicable outcome based on the comprehensive assessment; -A resident who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene; -The facility will maintain individual objectives on the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. Review of facility policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep a clean kitchen, failed to store food off the floor, failed to label food when it was opened, failed to temperature check foods at food service time, and failed to ensure staff washed their hands when contaminated. The facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Food Safety Requirements, undated, showed: -Food will be stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professioanl standards for food service safety. -Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with the delivery of the food to the resident. Elements of the process include the following: -Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to preserve and enhance residents' dignity when staff did not ensure call lights were within reach for three residents(Residents #100, #9, and #40), when staff did not respond to call lights timely for one resident (Resident #19), and when staff moved two residents' personal belongings without them being present (Resident #7 and #58). This affected seven of 28 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, revised 9/1/22, showed: -The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. -The right to receive services and/or items included in the plan of care; -The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity; -The resident has a right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when staff failed to keep all areas of resident rooms clean, did not keep trash picked up off the floor, keep floors free of dirt and grime, remove used meal service dishes from rooms, empty trash in resident rooms, change dirty linens, and wipe down over bed tables, and properly clean soiled and stained furniture that was readily accessible to the residents of [NAME] hall and Maple hall. This affected eight (Resident #62, #18, #69, #35, #3, #40, #55, #31) of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility Residential Environmental Quality policy, dated 9/28/22 showed: - It is the policy of the facility to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Review of the facility Routine Cleaning and Disinfection policy, dated 9/1/21 showed: - It is the policy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the criminal background check (CBC) of three out of six sampled nursing staff employees was completed, when the facility did not provide in the employee HR (Human Resource) file that the facility had completed a criminal back ground check through the Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) prior to allowing resident contact, nor did they retain any documentation supporting that it had been completed by the facility. The facility census was 82. Review of the Missouri State Statute Chapter 192.2495 dated 8/28/18 showed: Prior to allowing any person who has been hired as a full-time, part-time or temporary position to have contact with any patient or resident the provider shall, or in the case of temporary employees hired through or contracted for an employment agency, the employment agency shall prior to sending a temporary employee to a provider: (1) Request a criminal background check as provided in section 43.540. Completion of an inquiry to the highway patrol for criminal records that are available for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents(Resident #8, and #15) who had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and unspecified psychosis ( both are a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) completed and reviewed by the facility as part of the resident's admission into the facility. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for PASARR. 2. Review of Resident #15's quartley Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 9/26/23., showed: - A brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. - Showed resident received cognitive-enhancing medications for dementia (a condition in which the brain function is impaired and affects reasoning and memory) and bi-polar treatment ( A psychiatric illness characterized by both hyper and depressive episodes of behavior). - Resident required one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when licensed nursing staff failed to ensure that physician orders were carried out correctly for Residents #25, #35, and #45. This affected three out of the 18 sampled residents directly for medication administration,The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on documentation of mediation administration. 1. Review of Resident #45's significant change minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 10/31/23, showed: -Resident was cognitively intact; -Required partial to moderate assistance with showers, toileting hygiene, and tub or shower transfers; -Utilized motorized wheelchair; -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, lymphedema (condition that causes swelling in an arm or leg caused by a lymphatic system blockage), atherosclerosis (the build up of fats, cholesterol, and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide bathing assistance and document showers for three of the 18 sampled dependent residents (Resident #40, #55, and #3). The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on activities of daily living (ADL's). 1. Review of Resident #40's annual minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 9/26/23 showed: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Required substantial or maximal assistance with shower and bathing self, lower body dressing, sitting to standing mobility, chair to bed transfers; -Used a manual wheelchair for mobility; -Diagnoses included: Hemiplegia (a symptom that involves one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness) following a stroke and affecting left-non-dominant side, generalized muscle weakness, sensorineural hearing loss (the inner ear nerve responsible for transmitting sounds are damaged), metabolic encephalopathy (condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that four of 20 sampled residents, (Residents #45, #8, #25, and #33) who required staff assistance, were provided with adequate assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's: tasks completed to care for oneself daily such as bathing, dressing, moving from a chair to bed, and personal hygiene). The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on ADLs. 1. Review of Resident #25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/17/23 showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment; - The resident requires setup assistance for eating and oral hygiene; - The resident is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, rolling, bathing, and transfers; - The resident is incontinent of urine and bowel; - Has diagnoses of heart failure (occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation for and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight, and failed to ensure scheduled maintenance of any bed rail, and failed to use an alternative to side rails, for four of 18 sampled residents (Resident,#40, #35, #5 and #33). The facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Bed Maintenance and Inspections, dated 2022 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, if any, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify and avoid areas of possible entrapment. -The maintenance director, or designee, is responsible for keeping records of bed inspections and maintenance. -A list of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails will be maintained, including the manufacturer for each. The maintenance director shall be notified of any new equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the facility's staffing timesheets, dated 04/01/23 to 5/31/23, showed no RN coverage for the following dates: -04/08/23; -04/09/23; -05/13/23; -05/21/23; -05/29/23; -05/30/23; and -05/31/23. Review of facility's timesheets, dated June 2023, showed RN coverage as the DON for eight hours no clock in or out. During an interview, on 12/14/23 at 04:43 P.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said they do not believe that they have had that many days without an RN, especially now that the DON is working in the building most days. They believe that the change in owner on June 1st is part of the problem and they have started a Quality Assurance and Performance (QAPI) Performance Improvement Project (PIP) for the staffing issues.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 8%, which affected two out of 20 sampled residents, (Resident #13 and #16). The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of medications. 1. Review of Resident #16's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/3/23 showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment; - The resident needs setup assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene; - Dependent of staff for medication management, toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and shower transfers; -Diagnoses of Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) after a stroke,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #20's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]., showed: - BIMS score of 15 indicating that resident is cognitely intact. - Dependent on staff for medication administration and insulin administration. - Diagnoses includes: Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces), Diabetic Neuropathy (painful tingling in the hands and feet as a result of diabetes), and history of Tramatic Brain Injury. Review of the resident's care plan, date 4/28/21., showed: - Resident has history of Tramatic Brain Injury. - Resident has Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. - Diabetes medication as ordered, and monitor for side effects. - Check blood sugars before meals and at bedtime. - Notify the physician is above 400 or below 60. Review of the resident's Physician order sheet for November and December., showed: - Novolog flex pen solution pen injector per sliding scale: 150= 2 units, 200= 4 units, 250= 5 units,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve meals according to scheduled meal times. This affected two of 18 sampled residents (Residents #33 and #25) . This had to potential to impact all residents residing in the community. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility posted meal times showed: -Breakfast to be served at 7:30 A.M. -Lunch to be served at 11:30 A.M. -Dinner to be served at 5:30 P.M. Review of facility policy, Food Safety Requirements, dated February 2023, showed: -Food and beverages shall be distributed and served to residents in a manner to prevent contamination and maintain food at the proper temperature; -Timely distribution of all meals/snacks. 1. Observation on 12/11/23 at 9:43 A.M. showed breakfast hall trays on Maple hall being served two hours and 13 minutes after posted meal time. Observation on 12/11/23 at 1:15 P.M. showed the first lunch tray served on the hall. All trays were served in resident rooms due to COVID-19 (a respiratory virus that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 (COVID-19,(an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)), when staff failed to apply and properly wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering Covid-19 positive rooms (Residents #35, #48, and #332), failed to sanitize or wash hands (Residents #35, #48, and #332,) , left a resident's door open who was Covid positive (Resident #332), and when the facility failed to provide doffing containers in resident's rooms (Resident #35, #48, and #332,). This affected three of 18 sampled residents (Residents #35, #48, and #332,). The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure they maintained the building in good repair. The facility census was 82. Observation on 12/11/23 at 4:42 P.M., on 12/12/23 starting at 10:33 A.M., and on 12/13/23 starting at 9:46 A.M., showed: - Duct tape used to repair the chair in the resident's telephone room; - The packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) unit in the window missing all the knobs and three of the fins broken/missing in room E10; - A crack in the ceiling around the bathroom light in room E8; - The exhaust vent had two screws lose and it pulled away from the ceiling half an inch in the bathroom in room E2; - The bathroom exhaust vent lined with debris in room B22; - The bathroom exhaust vent lined with debris in room B8; - Two fins broken/missing on the PTAC unit in room D12; - The brick corner of the building by the village exit had missing [NAME] that measured an area of one foot by three inches and the other corner on the same side of the building had a two by six inch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an annual dental exam for one sampled resident (Resident #15) and additionally failed to provide a dental consult for resident #15 who was requesting to be evaluated for replacement dentures for over one year. The facility census was 82 residents. 1.Review of resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed: -Resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. -Diagnosis of dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning). -Oral and Dental Status not completed on MDS. -Resident was independent eating, ambulation, and dressing. Review of resident's Care Plan, initiated 4/19/21 and revised on 10/10/23., showed: -Change in dentition and/or oral hygiene. - The resident does not have teeth and would like dentures. - Goals included: Dentures to be obtained by next review date, to be able to chew food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,267 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,267 — penalty dated 2024-09-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.3+1.7 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VHS MO OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2023
VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2023
VHS HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2023
VHS ULTIMATE PARENT LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2023
MILLER, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
COLLEGE ST CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
GATAPIA, RAMILOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
SIARD, ASHLEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$316K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 4%Other / private 11%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $316K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$264per resident / day
operating cost
$8,011per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$252per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265437. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next