Grove Park Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 86.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 171.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) all emergency equipment was readily available at bedside for residents with tracheostomies (a surgical opening in the neck to provide an airway and remove secretions from the lungs), b.) staff were trained to use the emergency tracheostomy equipment, and c.) the primary care nurses were aware of the residents' inner cannula sizes for their tracheostomies. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for tracheostomy (Resident #6 and Resident #174). 1.Resident #174 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a tracheostomy (trach). Observations and interviews on 02/17/26, revealed that emergency trach supplies were not being kept at Resident #174's bedside and readily available for use. There was no obturator (a device that fits inside the trach tube to guide it during insertion) in Resident #174's room, and staff were unable to locate any extra ones…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that three residents (R4, R62, and R175) out of a sample of 36 were treated with dignity and respect. Specifically, R4 was not permitted to go out on a pass without an escort even though the resident was their own responsible party. R62's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) wristband was not removed at the time of admission and could be observed by residents and visitors. R175 was denied the ability to leave the facility due to a past positive drug test and was not informed that he/she could refuse to submit to a drug screening. In addition, facility staff entered R175's room without knocking or announcing themselves. These failures resulted in actual and potential impacts on residents' dignity, autonomy, and rights.Findings include:1. Review of R4's Face Sheet located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the most recent admission date of 08/09/25, with diagnoses of paraplegia and muscle weakness. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's rooms was clean and in good repair creating a homelike environment for one resident (Resident (R)83) of 175 residents in the facility. Failure to provide a homelike environment has the potential to affect the resident's quality of life.Findings include:Review of R83's admission Record located under the admission tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R83 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of R83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) dated 02/03/26, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six out of 15 which indicated R83's cognition was severely impaired. Review of R83's care plan initiated on 08/15/24, located under the Care plan tab revealed that R83 had a focus that R83 was at risk for changes in mood related to dementia with interventions in place, to assess for physical/environmental changes that may precipitate change in mood.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a written transfer notice that contained all required information and the bed hold notice was provided for one of four residents (Resident (R)174) and/or their resident representatives (RR) reviewed for hospital transfer out of 36 sample residents. This failure had the potential to result in the resident and their RR to not have the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, the bed hold policy and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired.Findings include:Review of R174's undated Face Sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R174 was originally admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, and persistent vegetative state. Review of R174's Nursing Progress Notes located under the Progress Note tab in the EMR indicated on 02/07/26 at 1:10 PM, . Resident family member did ask the nurse that Resident responsible party [sic]. have instructed we send resident to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on, record review, interviews, policy review, the facility failed to provide training for three nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1, LPN2 and Registered Nurse (RN)3) to have the knowledge and competency to care for three of three residents (Resident (R)6, R174 and R199) with a tracheostomy. This failed practice had the potential to cause harm to the residents that had a tracheostomy. Findings include:During an interview on 02/17/26 at 2:06 PM, LPN11 was asked what emergency equipment needed to be at the bedside of a resident that has a tracheostomy. LPN1 stated, suction machine, Yankauer suction and a tracheostomy care kit. I don't remember what else needs to be in there. LPN1 was asked if he/she went into the resident's room and the tracheostomy cannula was dislodged, what would he/she do. LPN1 stated, I cannot remember but if you could help me out, I could use it. LPN1 stated that she could not remember receiving any in-service training regarding emergency tracheostomy care at the facility.During an interview on 02/17/26 at 2:45 PM, LPN 2 was asked what emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident (R) 119) out of five residents did not receive an unnecessary medication during medication pass. Findings include: Review of R119's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the tab Census revealed readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome. Observation during medication pass on 02/17/26 at 8:34PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 administered to R119 Ibuprofen 800 milligrams (mg) by mouth (PO) because R119 had complained of pain. During review of R119's Order Summary Report located in the EMR under the tab Orders dated 02/18/26 indicated no evidence of an order for Ibuprofen 800 mg being ordered as of 02/17/26. Review of R119's Blister Package dated 01/07/26 indicated, Ibuprofen 800 mg one tablet by mouth (PO) every six hours (Q6H) when needed (PRN) for moderate to severe pain for 14 days.Interview on 02/18/26 at 3:45 PM, RN1 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident (R) 142) out of five residents observed during medication administration received medication in a manner to prevent possible cross contamination in a sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Observation during medication pass on 02/17/26 at 8:34 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 2 placed all of R142's medications into the medication cup except one medication, gabapentin (medication to treat neuropathic pain) 300 milligram (mg). RN2 placed the gabapentin in another medication cup. RN2 picked up the gabapentin with her bare right hand, opened the gabapentin capsule and with her bare hands, poured the contents on top of the other medication. RN2 then administered R142 his/her medications. Review of admission Record, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Census tab was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of type2 diabetes mellitus, and contracture of muscle-right upper arm, and right thigh. Review of R142's Order Summary Report dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, and review of pertinent documentation it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate and implement measures to address an allegation that a visitor provided illegal, unapproved substance to a resident with history of substance abuse; which the resident ingested and reported it to the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 resident reviewed (Resident #1). The evident is as followed: A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to; opioid dependence, anxiety disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy. A review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 11/4/25, revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating that the resident's cognition was intact. A review of Resdient#1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed a physician order initiated on 11/14/25 for Buprenorphine HCL naloxone HCL dihydrate give 1 film sublingually every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect by failing to remove the weekly menus posted from resident's rooms who had a physician's order (PO) for NPO (nothing per orem (mouth)). This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #40, #88, and #141) reviewed that had a PO for NPO. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/10/24 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #141 seated on a Geri-chair (geri-chair is a large, padded chair that is designed to help seniors with limited mobility) in their room awake with their ongoing tube feeding (TF) (a way of providing nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract through an enteral access device (feeding tube) that is placed with its tip in the stomach or small intestine) machine. The surveyor further observed the facility's weekly menu posted on the wall next to Resident #141's bed. A review of Resident #141 medical records revealed that the resident was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and review of facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently serve the residents a nourishing snack when there were more than 15 hours between dinner and breakfast mealtimes. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #29, #61, #132, and #144) who attended during the resident council meeting and was evidenced by the following: On 10/11/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor conducted a group meeting with 5 alert and oriented residents selected by the facility to attend the group meeting. Four of the five residents stated they did not receive bedtime snacks. On 10/10/24 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD), who stated that the kitchen provided the five units in different floors with bedtime snacks. She could not provide an information if there was an accountability system the nursing staff used to document and ensure the residents were served their bedtime snacks. The FSD stated they do not keep a snack log to document and cannot provide accountability for the snacks that were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain appropriate kitchen sanitation practices and sanitary environment to prevent the development of food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor, together with the facility's Dietary Manager (DM) on 10/9/2024 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed the following: Upon entering the room where the dish machine was located, the surveyor observed 2 dietary staff inside cleaning the dishes that were used during breakfast. The surveyor asked the DM to turn on the dishwasher machine. When the DM turned on the dishwasher, the surveyor observed a significant amount of water splashing towards the drying rack where there were trays placed. The DM stated to the surveyor to step back because the dishwasher had water splash. The DM stated that the rack that was placed next to the dishwasher was a drying rack used to dry the meal trays. The surveyor observed the drying rack that was placed right next to the dishwasher…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,642 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $50,642 — penalty dated 2026-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $299K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ