No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Spring Creek Healthcare Center

1 Lindbergh Avenue, Perth Amboy, NJ 08861 · For profit - Individual · 179 certified beds · (732) 826-0500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1107 Convery Blvd · (732) 896-9962 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
360 US Highway 9 N · (732) 826-6084 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
527 N Park Dr · (718) 404-6568 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Chamberlain Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
494 Krochmally Ave · (732) 826-0045

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.4%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms42.6%12.1%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.4%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.3%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.8%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.682.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.801.111.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

15.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

15.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF15.8%CMS range 9.3–29.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.7–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 5.9–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.26
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.08
RN hoursweekends
48.5%
Total nursing turnover
53.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 150.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-15)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2021-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, physician interview, medical record review and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) recognize and assess the risk factors that placed a resident at risk for serious harm from drug overdose. b.) evaluate a resident's repeated symptoms of opioid intoxication that often occurred after the resident's return from treatment at a methadone clinic from [DATE] to [DATE]. c.) Evaluate the resident's non-compliance and how it may impact other residents. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #101, 1 of 24 residents reviewed for the quality of care provided to the facility residents and was evidenced by the following: Resident #101 experienced repeated significant changes in mental and physical condition that included stupor, altered mental status and collapse following visits to outside physicians and the methadone clinic . The facility could not provide any evidence that they attempted to determine the reason for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2021-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of other facility documentation during a Recertification survey ending on 4/6/21, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) follow isolation precaution protocols for residents on Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) on the unit for Persons under observation (PUI) and b.) properly isolate PUI residents from well, non Covid-19 exposed residents as a preventative measure to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. Residents and Health Care Personnel who have been exposed to Covid-19 have the potential to be Covid-19 positive and show no symptoms, thereby spreading this deadly virus. The facility's failure to isolate Resident #4, #45, #104, and #321 from the well, non-exposed residents posed a serious and immediate threat to the safety and wellbeing of the well, non-exposed residents. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation that began on 3/14/2021, when it was determined that the the facility failed to follow Transmission Based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2021-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of medical record and other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility did not have a Policy and Procedure to ensure a safe temperature for serving hot beverages to residents. A resident spilled coffee on his/her lap sustaining a second degree burn to both upper thighs. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate and institute in a timely manner staff training and procedures for serving hot beverages in order to mitigate further instances of harm to residents. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #85, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards and was evidenced by the following. During the initial tour on 03/15/21 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 85 in bed as the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assisted the resident with lunch. The CNA told the surveyor that Resident #85 had some confusion and behavior issues. The surveyor observed the resident ate some ice cream and stated that he/she was not feeling well. On 03/17/21, the surveyor reviewed the medical record which showed that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/09/2025 from 9:59 AM until 10:37 AM the surveyor, who was accompanied by the Director of the Kitchen (DOK), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the first refrigerator, there was baked ziti in a metal container covered with clear plastic wrap. It was dated 3/8/25. The DOK said the baked ziti was probably misdated, however she will throw it away. 2. In the first refrigerator there was a loaf of rye bread dated 3/13/25 and a loaf of raisin bread dated 3/24/25. The DOK said the bread is good for 30 days in the refrigerator. On 04/10/2025 at 12:11 PM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator clarified that bread is good for 5 to 7 days in the refrigerator and the 2 loaves of bread were discarded. On 04/10/2025 at 11:29 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1), observed the following in the second-floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility did not maintain the dignity of a resident specifically, by transporting the resident backward in a geriatric chair (specialized, high-backed reclining chair designed to provide comfort, support, and mobility for individuals with limited mobility) down the hallway. This deficiency was identified in 1 of the 36 residents (Resident # 2) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/13/2025 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Certified Nurse Aide #1, pulling the resident in a geriatric chair backward down the third-floor hallway. During an interview with the surveyor on 04/14/2025 at 11:22 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager #1 said that residents should not be pushed backward in their geriatric chairs as it is a dignity concern. During an interview with the surveyor on 04/15/2025 at 10:04 AM, the Director of Nursing said that residents should not be pushed backward in a geriatric chair it is a dignity issue. A review of a facility policy dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and sanitary environment for 2 of 3 units, the second floor and the third floor. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During initial tour on 04/09/2025 at 10:56 AM surveyor #1 observed the wall behind bed 1 in room [ROOM NUMBER], which had two strips of black sticky tape with what appeared to be white foam on them that looked to have been used to anchor an object to the wall. During a room visit on 04/10/2025 in room [ROOM NUMBER], bed 2, surveyor #1 observed broken trim with sharp edges along the center of the wall behind the resident's bed. The resident was unsure of how long the trim had been broken. During an interview on 04/14/2025 at 11:56 AM with surveyor #1, the Maintenance Director (MD) said that rounds on the resident's room were done daily to see if anything was in need of repair. The MD said that he would talk to the residents to see if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan that meets the medical needs identified on the comprehensive assessment care for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, Resident #36. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 36's admissions record revealed that, Resident #36 was admitted with but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), and Major Depressive Disorder. There was no order for Atrial Fibrillation (rapid heart rhythm) until brought to the facilities attention by the surveyor. A review of Resident #36's Electronical Medical Record revealed a physician's order with a state date of 08/05/2024 Apixaban (an anticoagulant used to lower the risk of a stroke) 5 milligrams twice a day for Arterial fibrillation. There were no orders to monitor for any signs of bleeding. A review of the current Care Plan (CP) for Resident #36 did not include documentation of a CP focus area or interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice by not storing a nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mask properly and failed to document the use of oxygen in Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for Respiratory Care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour on 04/09/2025 at 10:09AM, Resident #67 was observed sitting in the wheelchair with oxygen in use via a nasal cannula (tubing that delivers oxygen through the nose). The surveyor also observed a nebulizer mask laying open to air on the resident's bed. On 04/10/2025 at 11:29 AM the surveyor observed Resident # 67 in the wheelchair with oxygen in use via nasal cannula. The surveyor also observed a nebulizer mask laying open to air on the resident's bed with a plastic bag next to it. Resident # 67 said he/she uses oxygen everyday when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT # NJ168251 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/17/23 and 10/18/23, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures for a facility-initiated discharge. A resident (Resident #3) was involved in an altercation with another resident and was sent to the hospital for a behavioral evaluation. When the resident was discharged from the hospital, the facility would not permit the resident to return to the facility. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #3, 1 of 6 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart), Peripheral Vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses, b.) properly wash hands and c.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/27/2023 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen, in the presence of the Regional Food Service Director (RFSD) and the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following: The surveyor observed an unlabeled box filled with seven logs of frozen ground beef in the freezer. Upon interviewing the dietary aide (DA), the DA stated the older meat was placed in the same box on top of the newer meat and informed the surveyor that they could tell the difference because the older meat had a darker discoloration. The surveyor asked how they could identify the date that the older or newer meat came in to which neither the DA, RFSD, nor the FSD could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide daily delivery of mail, to include Saturdays. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 7 residents interviewed during the resident council group meeting (Resident #21, #30, #43, #72, #73, #91 and #100), and was evidenced by the following: On 04/03/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor attended a resident council group meeting with Residents #21, #30, #43, #72, #73, #91 and #100. The surveyor interviewed the residents regarding mail delivery and all the residents in attendance told the surveyor that mail was only delivered on Mondays and Fridays, with no other days during the week. On 04/04/23 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Activities Director (AD) regarding mail delivery. The AD told the surveyor that the process for the mail was that it gets delivered to the facility, the front desk goes through the mail and hands it over to the business office. From the business office, the mail then goes to the Social Worker (SW) who will go through the mail and the mail then gets placed in a box for the activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 26 residents reviewed, Resident #54. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the admission Record for Resident #54 which reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included depression and hypertension (high blood pressure). The surveyor reviewed the smoking safety evaluation dated 6/30/22, which indicated that Resident #54 currently smokes. The surveyor reviewed Resident #54's Annual MDS dated [DATE]. The section for current tobacco use was coded as zero (0), indicating that Resident #54 does not currently use tobacco. When interviewed on 4/3/23 at 12:38 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated that Resident #54's Annual MDS dated [DATE] should have been coded as Resident #54 currently using tobacco. When interviewed on 4/4/23 at 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain professional standards of clinical practice for 1 of 28 residents reviewed (Resident # 206) by failing to document the transfer of a resident to the hospital following a fall. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The nurse practice act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure expired controlled substance (narcotic) medications were detected, removed, and disposed from the emergency (back-up) supply identified for 1 of 1 back up box. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/3/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered the room that contained the narcotic back up medications which was stored in a locked box in a locked room on the second floor. At 10:34 AM, the surveyor with the ADON began the inspection of the narcotic medications in the back up box. At 10:36 AM, in the presence of the ADON, the surveyor observed five patches of Fentanyl 50 microgram/hour (mcg/hr.; a medication used to relieve the symptom of pain) which reflected a manufacturer expiration date of 8/2022. At that time, the ADON confirmed she observed five Fentanyl 50 mcg/hr. which reflected a manufacturer expiration date of 8/2022. At 10:52 AM, in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication observation performed on 3/31/23, the surveyors observed two (2) nurses administer medication to five (5) residents. There were 28 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed, which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 7.14%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (Unsampled Resident #1, and Unsampled Resident #2) that were administered medications by 1 of 2 nurses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/31/23 at 8:21 AM, during the medication administration observation, the surveyor observed breakfast meal trays being collected from resident rooms, indicating breakfast had been served and consumed. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) informed the surveyor at this time that Unsampled Resident #1 had already eaten breakfast. The surveyor observed the LPN as she prepared 11 medications for Unsampled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ATLAS, SAMIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2021
KURLAND, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 9%Other / private 8%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$301per resident / day
operating cost
$9,154per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$310per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315305. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next