No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St. Johnsbury Health & Rehab

1248 Hospital Drive, Saint Johnsbury, VT 05819 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (802) 748-8757 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$314,323 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $314,323 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-28)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 49% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
97 Sherman Dr Ste 1 · (802) 748-5131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
957 Memorial Dr · (802) 748-2778 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
857 Memorial Dr · (802) 748-1109 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Emerson Falls · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1097 Hospital Dr · (802) 748-5683

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.2%19.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms58.1%13.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%5.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.7%16.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%97.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%5.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.3%26.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.9%19.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.8%78.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%22.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit29.1%17.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.981.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.242.881.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.9%CMS range 43.9–59.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.1–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.5–8.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
74.1%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 67.3 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-28)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by not providing goods and services to residents' that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress by failing to develop and implement adequate systems to meet the care and service needs of residents.During the investigation the team identified many failures, some of which are widespread system failure, which included: providing adequate nursing staff to safely care for all residents;development of baseline care plans for newly admitted residents;development, revision, and implementation of comprehensive care plans to meet resident's needs;ensure all applicable residents have care plan interventions and supervision to prevent falls;administration of all ordered medications and treatments;ensure timely administration of all ordered medications and treatments;ensure ordered laboratory tests are performed timely and included in the residents' electronic health record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director duties per the Medical Director Agreement and Medical Director facility policy were performed, including ensuring resident care policies were implemented and coordination of care was provided to ensure resident care and services were provided to all resident that were consistent with current professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 units. On 7/18/25 the facility was notified of non-compliance at the immediate jeopardy (IJ) level for Medical Director. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous complaint survey, dated 4/8/25. On 7/23/25 the facility's IJ plan of correction was accepted. An unannounced onsite assessment of the IJ removal was conducted on 7/24/25 and the IJ was confirmed to be removed as of 7/23/25. Findings include:Review of a document titled, MEDICAL DIRECTOR AGREEMENT, signed by the Sr (senior) Director of Human Resources on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents regarding staff having the knowledge and ability to provide care and services, but choosing not to do it, or acknowledge the request for assistance from a resident resulting in care deficits to a resident. Resident #1 suffered serious harm that rose to the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to prevent neglect. As a result, Resident #1 expereinced symptoms related to very high, unsafe blood sugar and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Review of the admission Packet given to every resident in the facility includes the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy. The policy defines Neglect as the intentional or reckless failure or omission by a caregiver to: Provide care or arrange for goods or services necessary to maintain the health or safety of a vulnerable adult, including, but not limited to . medicine . supervision and medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents received care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice. Resident #1 suffered serious harm that rose to the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to provide care in accordance with professional standards, As a result, Resident #1 experienced symptoms related to very high, unsafe blood sugar and psychosocial harm. Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association: Scope and Standards of Practice (http://www.Nursingworld.org © 2010 American Nurses Association) The Standards of Professional Nursing Practice are authoritative statements of the duties that all registered nurses, regardless of role, population, or specialty, are expected to perform competently. The Standards of Professional Nursing Practice include: 1.) Recognizes the healthcare consumer as the authority on her or his own health by honoring their care preferences. An interview was conducted with Resident #1 on 5/14/25 at 9:37 AM. The resident stated s/he had h/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free from accidents as possible related to falls for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) by failing to provide adequate supervision and create and implement effective, timely interventions that would reduce the likelihood of future falls. As a result, Resident #1 suffered a fall that resulted in pain and a hip fracture that required surgery. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey dated 12/11/24 and a partial survey dated 10/25/23. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include history of falls, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, and paranoid schizophrenia. A 2/3/25 Physician admission note reads, Resident #1 is transferred here with [his/her spouse] due to increased care needs and inability to perform ADLs [activities of daily living]. [S/He] is [primarily] bed bound at times. [S/He] can and will ambulate in the [facility] with a front…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and revise a baseline care plan, specific to the person-centered care related to elopement for 1 applicable resident (Resident #1), who left the facility undetected, was found on the road by a local citizen and brought to the Emergency Department with multiple lacerations. Findings include: Record review reveals that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological disorder that presents with confusion, muscle movement coordination disorder, and vision problems), dementia, orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure after standing that can cause dizziness or lightheadedness), and history of falling. An 8/31/23 progress note reveals that an elopement assessment determined that Resident #1 is at high risk for elopement as evidenced by Resident #1's verbalizing the desire to leave the facility, reported family history of elopement, and recent general cognitive decline. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one applicable resident (Resident #1) by neglecting to provide services that are necessary to avoid physical harm and emotional distress related to refusing to allow Resident #1 to get out of bed, putting them at increased risk for medical complications related to immobility such as, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, and constipation and cardiovascular complications (which could promote a bowel obstruction); and failing to answer call bells and provide care for Resident #1 so that they maintain dignity and quality of life. Findings include: Per interview on 10/19/23 at 4:01 PM, Resident #1's Representative indicated that Resident #1 was neglected to be provided care while at the facility. S/He stated that Resident #1 was not allowed to leave his/her bed until 9/25/23, the day s/he was transferred to the hospital, was forced to wear a brief even though s/he was not incontinent and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) remained free of accidents as possible related to creating and implementing interventions to reduce hazards for Residents #3 and #4; providing appropriate and sufficient supervision to prevent an avoidable accident for Residents #2, #3, and #4; and providing assistive devices necessary to prevent an avoidable accident from occurring for Resident #2. Findings include: 1. The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with sufficient supervision and assistive devices to prevent an avoidable fall from occurring. As a result, Resident #2 suffered a fall in which s/he was on the floor for an extended period, soiled and cold, and dislodged his/her G-tube (a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen and directly into the stomach). Resident #2 required a transfer to the ER (Emergency Room) and have an Naso Gastric tube (NG tube; a feeding tube inserted through the nose, down the throat, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident # 1) with a urinary catheter receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospital stay for cardiac complications. Resident #1's health history included congestive heart failure, diabetes, cardiac disease, hypertension, and stroke. A hospital discharge note dated 9/21/23 reveals that Resident #1 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Facility policy titled NGS209 Catheter: Urinary- Justification for Use, last reviewed 8/7/23 states: Patients who have urinary catheters upon admission or subsequently receive one will be assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the patient's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary. If patient's situation meets any of the indwelling catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's right to make choices, for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #4) with the resident subsequently sustaining injury. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #4 has diagnoses that include unspecified dementia with agitation and cognitive communication deficit. Per an MDS (Minimum Data Set, a resident assessment tool) dated 12/9/25, Resident #4 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Per record review, Resident #4 has a care plan focus initiated 5/13/25, which indicates that Resident #4 is resistive to care related to difficulty adjusting to facility, and cognitive loss and dementia, with an intervention to Allow time for expression of feelings; provide empathy, encouragement, and reassurance, last revised 8/3/25. Resident #4 has a care plan focus last revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #4). The care plan was not revised and implemented to address Resident 4's physically aggressive behavior. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated 7/25/25. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #4 has diagnoses that include dementia with agitation and cognitive communication deficit. Per an MDS (Minimum Data Set, a resident assessment tool) dated 12/9/25, Resident #4 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Per record review, a nursing progress note on 11/3/25 noted that the resident displayed increased behavior and agitation. Resident made a fist and threatened to knock a staff member out, then proceeded to push a staff member out of the way. Resident #4 sustained a skin tear during this incident. A subsequent nursing note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by having unlabeled food available for use and not ensuring proper refrigerator temperatures. Findings include:Per review of the facility's Food Procurement policy [revised date 11/2025] states: RESPONSIBILITIES: Food Service Director maintains the approved vendor list. Oversees purchasing and receiving practices. Ensures regulatory compliance. Dietary staff inspect deliveries up receipt. Reject unacceptable products. Ensure proper storage of accepted item. Receiving 1. All food deliveries shall be inspected at the time of receipt for: *proper temperatures. *Signs of spoilage, contamination, or damage. *Expiration or use-by dates. 2.Products not meeting standards shall be rejected and documented. 3.Accepted food items shall be labeled and stored immediately according to temperature and storage requirements. During the initial tour of the food service department on 1/25/26 at 4:22pm there was a very strong offensive odor noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 4 sampled residents were free from accident hazards related to supervision and fall hazards (Resident #25), wheelchair and device maintenance (Residents #25 and Resident #50), and smoking safety for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #71). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey dated 12/11/24 and two partial surveys dated 3/28/25 and 7/24/25. Findings include: 1. Per a record review, Resident #25 has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and history of falling. Resident #25 has a care plan focus of ADL [activities of daily living] self-care deficit related to physical limitations with an intervention dated 9/19/25 for extensive assist of 1 with transfers. Resident #25 also has a care plan focus of At risk for falls due to history of falls, impaired balance/poor coordination with interventions dated 9/19/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided informed consent for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #43). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #43 has a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 15 as of 1/15/26, indicating they had no cognitive impairment. Resident #43 has major diagnoses of Type II Diabetes and a BKA [Below the knee amputation]. They are independent with ADLs [Activities of Daily Living] and hygiene. Per record review of Resident #43's MAR [Medication Administration Record] contains an order stating, Venlafaxine HCl [a medication used to treat depression] ER [extended release] Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 75 MG [milligrams]: Give 75 mg [milligrams] by mouth one time a day. Per record review, the medication was written on 7/3/25 and was discontinued completely on 7/21/25. Per record review, a psychiatric note dated 7/2/25 at 9:19 AM states, MDD [Major Depressive Disorder], severe, recurrent-start Venlafaxine as above, also helps anxiety. Per record review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive choices were indicated in the electronic medical record for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey dated [DATE]. Findings include:Per record review of Resident # 3's COLST (Clinicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form dated [DATE] revealed the resident chose to decline CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and desires DNR (do not resuscitate) status. Resident # 3's care plan initiated [DATE] and revised [DATE] stated Resident #3 is a full code indicating the resident would want CPR. A physician's order dated [DATE] reads full code. The EMR (electronic medical record) care profile for Resident #3 has a section for code status that reads full code. This does not match Resident #3's COLST.Per interview with RN Unit Manager of B wing on [DATE] at 2:33 PM stated that they use the residents care profile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide notice of bed hold to 1 of 1 residents in the sample (Resident #22). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated 5/28/25. Findings include: Per record review a nursing progress note dated 6/15/25 reflects that Resident #22 was sent to the hospital emergency department during an emergent medical event. Per record review there was no bed hold notice in the resident's chart. There was no documented evidence showing the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the hospitalization. Per review of the facility's Bed Holds and Returns policy [no revision date] states, In the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policies to the resident and/or the resident representative as soon as practicable.The facility will keep a copy of the bed hold notice information given to the resident and/or resident representative in the medical records. The facility's policy did not include information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that Medication Regimen Reviews were performed by the Consulting Pharmacist and acted on for one of five sampled residents (Resident #49). Findings include:1.Per record review, Resident #49 did not have MRRs (Medication Regimen Reviews, a review of the resident's medications with recommendations from the pharmacist) for January 2025, February 2025, March 2025, and May 2025.Per review of Pharmacy Consultant Policy & Procedure policy [no revised or reviewed date] states, The pharmacist will report any irregularities to the attending physician and the Director of Nursing, and these reports must be acted upon. The attending physicians are not required to agree with the pharmacist's report, nor are they required to provide a rationale for their acceptance or rejection of the report. They must, however, act upon the report. This may be accomplished by indicating acceptance or rejection of the report and signing their name. Additionally, it states The pharmacy consultant will do a monthly review of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility are within their expiration date and failed to secure medications for 1 of 2 medication treatment carts. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated [DATE]. Findings include:1. Per observation on [DATE] at 10:14AM Unit B's medication room contained five covid-19 vaccinations with an expiration date of [DATE] in the freezer. Review of a policy titled Storage of Medications states: Unused medications: The pharmacy and all medication rooms are inspected by the pharmacist consultant for discontinued, outdated, defective or deteriorated medications. Per interview on [DATE] at approximately 10:30 AM the Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager of B wing confirmed the items were ready for use and expired. 2. Per observation on [DATE] at 3:52 PM, the medication treatment cart was observed to be unlocked at the nursing station. There were two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention measures of hand hygiene were performed during medication administration for one of four residents in the applicable sample (Resident #24). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated 4/25/25. Findings include:Per observation on 1/27/26 at 8:37 AM of medication administration the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) did not perform hand hygiene before or after administering Resident # 24 their medications. The LPN returned to her cart and proceeded with medication administration with non-washed hands. Per interview on 1/27/26 at approximately 8:45 AM, the LPN confirmed that she did not perform hand hygiene before or after medication administration.Per record review of the facility's Administering Oral Medications policy [no revised date] states: Wash your hands. prior to administration, and Perform hand antisepsis. after administration.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs) and Registered Nurses (RN) for 8 consecutive hours a day to provide nursing services, considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. This is a repeat deficiency cited during a facility Recertification Survey on 12/11/24. Findings include:Per interview on 7/16/2025 at 12:19 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that she frequently works overtime to provide the facility with RN coverage. She is one of the two staff members who are trained to draw blood for labs. The facility has 30 outstanding labs that were ordered between 6/30/25 and 7/14/25 that have not been processed. She states she cannot keep up with them as there are not enough staff.Per record review, a Missed Medications Report between the dates of 5/17/25-7/17/25 revealed 2,177 pages of missed medications and treatments.Per review of the late medication report provided on 7/17/25, contained 6,017…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it used the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 18 days from 5/1/2025 to 7/13/2025. Findings include:A review of the facilities' staffing schedules from 5/1/25 to 7/13/25 revealed 8 days with no RN scheduled [6/21, 6/28, 6/29, 7/4, 7/5, 7/6, 7/12, 7/13] and 10 days [6/24, 6/30, 7/1, 7/2, 7/3, 7/7, 7/8, 7/9, 7/10, 7/11], where there were not 8 consecutive hours of RN services.Per interview with the Administrator on 7/17/2025 at 4:09 PM, where she confirmed that the facility did not have a Registered Nurse scheduled or present in the building for a minimum of 8 consecutive hours daily as required by regulation on the 18 days above.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — widespread
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors by not administering all medications as prescribed, and in a timely manner. This issue was determined to be widespread, potentially impacting all residents in the facility. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #'1's diagnosis list revealed s/he had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Resident's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed that the Resident was a long-term user of insulin and Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: Status: Chronic. The hospital discharged the Resident to this facility with a medication list titled, Home Medication List that included insulin glargine [Lantus Solostar U-100 Insulin] 28 unit subcutaneous every morning. Last Taken: [DATE] 07:57 28 units. This Home Medication List consisted of 13 medications with dose and instructions/orders. Next to each medication was a check mark and on page #1 handwritten Entered PCC [Point…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — widespread
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed have a functioning system to obtain laboratory services which has the potential to impact all residents and failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 4 of 14 sampled residents (Residents # 3, #5, #6, and #7). Findings include:1.) Per record review, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel, and history of repeated falls. A transfer of care note (TOC) dated 4/30/25 reveals that Resident #6 had a fall on 4/24/25. A fall assessment included in the 4/30/25 TOC indicated that s/he is a fall risk, scored at 10 (a score of 4 or more is considered a risk for falling) based on 3 or more diagnosis, prior history of falls within 2 months, incontinence, visual impairment, impaired functional mobility, environmental hazards, poly pharmacy, pain affecting level of functioning, and cognitive impairment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to maintain the physical well-being of each resident, whereby actions and decisions by the facility's leadership team directly contributed to deficiencies that resulted in immediate jeopardy (F600 and F841). In addition, there are several repeat deficiencies. The identified failures by the lack of administrative oversight for a large amount of regulatory requirements in multiple areas of compliance put all residents at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include:1.Interviews with the Medical Director; past and present, VP of Clinical Services, Administrator, and facility staff reveal that Resident #1 did not receive quality care and services specific to their long-standing diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, and they did not receive insulin although they had been a chronic user of insulin per their hospital discharge summary, ED (Emergency Department) notes/documentation, and interview with the Resident's son. See F655 for additional information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), the facility failed to address all systems of care in a comprehensive manner by identifying problems and opportunities for improvement in the areas of treatment/services specific to meeting required regulatory visits; appropriate staffing levels: ensuring there was an RN in the building for 8 consecutive hours 7 days/week; residents care supervised by a physician to include required regulatory visits; laboratory orders were performed timely; neglect (cited at immediate jeopardy level); administration; and Medical Director (cited at immediate jeopardy level). The identified failure to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program to identify problems and provide system oversight has the potential put all residents at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include:During a complaint investigation with 3 complaints the facility was found to have deficient practices that resulted in 2 citations at immediate jeopardy level and 15 deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to report 2 allegations of abuse of a resident to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner. Findings include:1. Per review of complaint #24087 regarding Resident #13, received on 5/29/25 from a provider who stated in their complaint that Resident #13 had alleged abuse by a facility staff member. The complaint also stated that the allegations of abuse were reported to the facility Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/28/25 by the provider over the phone. During an interview on 6/4/25 at approximately 1:00 PM the Director of Nursing confirmed that she had been contacted by the provider, however, was not provided with specific details and did not think she needed to report the allegation to the State agency. The facility Administrator filed a report on 6/4/25 after learning of this incident from the survey team. 2. Per record review, Resident #12's physician progress notes dated 6/21/25 revealed the resident had mentioned to the provider an allegation of staff to resident abuse where a CNA slapped (pronoun…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that includes communication, behavioral symptoms, psychotropic medication drug use, activities, dental care, pressure ulcers, falls, and diabetic care needs for 6 of 14 residents in the sample (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #6, and #8). Findings include: 1.) Per record review, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel, and history of repeated falls. A transfer of care note (TOC) dated 4/30/25 reveals that Resident #6 had a fall on 4/24/25. A fall assessment included in the 4/30/25 TOC indicated that s/he is a fall risk, scored at 10 (a score of 4 or more is considered a risk for falling) based on 3 or more diagnosis, prior history of falls within 2 months, incontinence, visual impairment, impaired functional mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for 2 residents of 14 (Residents #1 and #8). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous complaint survey, dated 11/19/24. Findings include:1.) Per record review, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel, and history of repeated falls. A transfer of care note (TOC) dated 4/30/25 reveals that Resident #6 had a fall on 4/24/25. A fall assessment included in the 4/30/25 TOC indicated that s/he is a fall risk, scored at 10 (a score of 4 or more is considered a risk for falling) based on 3 or more diagnosis, prior history of falls within 2 months, incontinence, visual impairment, impaired functional mobility, environmental hazards, poly pharmacy, pain affecting level of functioning, and cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to update comprehensive care plans in a timely manner for 6 of 14 sampled residents. (Resident ID #'s 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10). Findings include: Per record review on 7/21/25 of Resident #2's current care plan revealed the review due date was 7/3/25 and the target completion date was 7/10/25. Per record review on 7/21/25 of Resident #3's current care plan revealed the review due date was 6/25/25 and the target completion date was 7/7/25.Per record review on 7/21/25 of Resident #4's current care plan revealed the review due date was 6/24/25 and the target completion date was 7/1/25.Per record review on 7/21/25 of Resident #5's current care plan revealed the review due date was 6/24/25 and the target completion date was 7/8/25.Per record review on 7/21/25 of Resident #9's current care plan revealed the review due date was 6/5/25 and the target completion date was 6/12/25.Per record review on 7/21/25 of Resident #10's current care plan revealed the review due date was 7/1/25 and the target completion date was 7/8/25.Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify ordering physician's when ordered lab draws had not been performed and provider's were not notified when laboratory results had been received for 3 of 14 residents (Residents #5, #6, and #7) . This is a repeat deficiency from the recertification survey on dated on 12/11/24. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #6 has a diagnosis of diabetes. S/He had the following labs drawn, per physician order for “BMP, BNP, CBC, TSH, Vit D, A1C” on 5/23/25 which revealed that Resident #6 had a blood glucose on 330 (range 74-106) in addition to multiple other test results to be found out of range. The lab results in Resident #6 did not include a result for A1c values. Per review of a 6/26/25 Nurse Practitioner follow up note, the NP when discussing the resident and their blood sugar, the A1c results were still “pending.” Per an email dated 6/23/25, a Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed that the A1c value drawn on 5/23/25 was not in Resident #6’s medical record. She indicated that the A1c result from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe and effective skin and wound care consistent with facility policy and professional standards of practice for preventing and treating existing pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #6). As a result, a resident with an admitting diagnosis of an unstageable pressure ulcer was sent to the emergency room related to cellulitis of the right foot requiring antibiotic treatment, and a stage 2 (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) right foot ulcer. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 12/11/24. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel, and history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement relevant, consistent, and individualized interventions to prevent falls from occurring for 1 applicable resident at risk for falls (Resident #6). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 12/11/25, and cited at a harm level during a complaint survey dated 3/28/25. Findings include:Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement relevant, consistent, and individualized interventions to prevent falls from occurring for 1 applicable resident at risk for falls (Resident #6). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 12/11/25, and cited at a harm level during a complaint survey dated 3/28/25. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' care is supervised by a physician for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #6) by not ensuring a plan was in place to manage the resident's diabetes or pressure ulcer. As a result, a resident with an admitting diagnosis of an unstageable pressure ulcer was sent to the emergency room related to cellulitis of the right foot requiring antibiotic treatment, and a stage 2 (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) right foot ulcer. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel, and history of repeated falls. A transfer of care note (TOC) dated 4/30/25 reveals that Resident #6 has Accu-Chek Glucometer and Freestyle Libre (both are used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all regulatory provider visits were completed for 1 of 14 residents. (Resident #8). Findings include:Per record review for Resident #8 revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, Hypokalemia, Acute on [sic] Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Hypomagnesemia, Urinary Tract Infection, Sepsis, Pain in left Shoulder, COPD, OSA, Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent Severe Psychotic Features and Unspecified Open Wound of Lower Back and Pelvis without Penetration into retroperitoneum, Presence of Prosthetic Heart Valve, Severe Sepsis without Septic Shock, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. Review of practitioner notes revealed the first physician visit occurred on 6/27/25, this does not meet the regulatory requirement of a 30 days physician onsite visit. Interview on 7/23/25 at approximately 4:10 PM, the current DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents did not self-administer medications despite physician orders forbidding this. Findings include: Review of Physician orders for Resident #1 dated 4/14/25 include Resident MAY NOT administer own meds. Further review of medication orders for Resident #1 includes Zenpep Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles-give 5 capsules by mouth before meals for pancreatic enzymes. Start date 5/1/25. The scheduled administration times are 7:30 AM, 11:30 AM, & 4:30 PM. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record [MAR] for May 2025, also includes an order for the Zenpep Oral Capsules- Give 3 capsules by mouth as needed for PM with snacks, 21 max caps a day, starting 5/1/25. There were no entries documented for the as needed for PM dose from the start dated of 5/1/25 to the day of the survey 5/14/25. Per observation and interview with Resident #1 on 5/14/25 at 9:37 AM, the resident stated [s/he] was in possession of the prescribed medication Zenpep Oral Capsule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for1 of 3 sampled residents [Resident #1], that prior to transfer to an Emergency Department, appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider, and before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the nursing facility's policies regarding bed-hold periods, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record reveals the resident has diagnoses that include: Diabetes mellitus [a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine] due to a underlying condition with hyperglycemia [high blood sugar], a history of a pancreatectomy [surgical procedure involving the removal of the pancreas]- [Your pancreas makes hormones (like insulin) that help control the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were safely stored and accessible only by authorized personnel for 1 resident [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of Physician orders for Resident #1 dated 4/14/25 include medication orders for Zenpep Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles-give 5 capsules by mouth before meals for pancreatic enzymes. Start date 5/1/25. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record [MAR] for May 2025, also includes an order for the Zenpep Oral Capsules- Give 3 capsules by mouth as needed for PM with snacks, 21 max caps a day, starting 5/1/25. Per observation and interview with Resident #1 on 5/14/25 at 9:37 AM, the resident stated [s/he] was in possession of the prescribed medication Zenpep Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles and proceeded to show the surveyors multiple capsules in a clear plastic medicine cup. The resident stated this was the only medication [s/he] was allowed to keep by [h/herself], and that all the other medications were kept by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medical director fulfilled her/his responsibilities to effectively implement resident care policies and coordinate medical care for residents in the facility regarding the surveillance of, and development of policies that reflect current professional standards of practice to prevent the spread of potential COVID-19 infection, and coordinate care of residents. This has the potential to impact all residents. Finding include: Per review of the facility documented COVID-19 outbreak line listing for residents revealed that 12 tested positive for COVID-19 during the period of 1/14/25 and 1/26/25. There were no deaths or hospitalizations that resulted from this outbreak. Per interview with an Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) on 3/5/25 at 1:00 PM, she/he stated that they were given direction to pull all precaution carts, and to stop testing the residents and staff for COVID-19. She/he stated that these directives came from the DON (Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: 1.) Review of the facility documented COVID-19 outbreak line listing revealed that 12 residents tested positive for COVID-19 between 1/14/25 and 1/26/25. Review of an email dated 1/23/25 from VDH ([NAME] Department of Health) to this facility, which confirmed VDH's receipt on 1/23/25 of the facility notification of a COVID-19 outbreak with the first onset of symptoms being on 1/14/25. The facility reported to VDH that residents who were COVID-19 positive had mild cold symptoms. On 1/23/25, the VDH nurse included a copy of a blank line listing and requested the facility fill it in with as much detail as possible and send it back to me. On 1/27/25 a second email from the VDH nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-08 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that that facility failed to ensure the staff member designated as the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) had obtained specialized Infection Prevention and Control training beyond initial professional training. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/5/25 at approximately 2:45 PM, s/he stated that s/he was working as the DON and the Infection Preventionist until they found a replacement for the Infection Preventionist. S/he was working on her/his Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Infection Prevention and Control certification. S/he confirmed that the facility did not currently have a qualified designated Infection Preventionist for this facility. S/he stated that the corporate DON was providing oversight once per week of the infection prevention program. Per interview with the Administrator and the VP (Vice President) of Operations on 3/5/25 at approximately 5:00 PM, it was confirmed that the Infection Preventionist position was being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs and individual needs, such as timely medication administration, as required by the resident's diagnoses, medical condition, or plan of care, potentially impacting all residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Per review of the facility's Medication Administration and Documentation-General policy, the responsibility of the licensed is nurse is listed as Administers medications within one hour before or after prescribed time. Per record review of Resident #3's Medication Administration audit report from 12/1/24 to 12/10/24 there were 52 medications that were given past the allotted time specified in the policy. The medications included Clonzaepam (medication used to treat anxiety), Topiramate (medication used to treat seizures), Eliquis (a medication to prevent strokes), Sertraline (a medication used to treat depression),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to prevent accidents/incidents for one of 9 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #81). Findings include: Per interview conducted on 12/9/24 at 11:11 AM, Resident #192 said Resident #81 has entered his/her room without permission on several occasions, once climbing into Resident #192's bed, and once holding a fork in her/his hand. During an interview on 12/9/24 at 2:30 PM, Resident #80 said Resident #81 climbed onto his/her bed while s/he was in it and grabbed his/leg, causing pain. Resident #80 also said it frightens him/her when Resident #81 enters their room as it is often in the middle of the night. During an interview with Resident #84 on 12/9/24 at 2:57 PM, Resident #84 said that Resident #81 often enters his/her room without permission. Resident #84 feels that this is an invasion of his/her privacy and has complained about it. Per record review, Resident #81 was admitted to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral treatment and services to residents who display or are diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty in order to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 9 (sampled residents (Residents #67, # 8, 74, #73, & #2). Findings include: Review of the facility's 'Behaviors: Management of Symptoms policy' [Policy NSG206 Revised 7/1/24] reveals Based on the comprehensive assessment, staff must ensure that a patient: who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Under 'Practice Standards', the policy includes Behavioral health care and services shall be provided in an environment that is conducive to mental and psychosocial wellbeing. 1. Per review of Res.67's Care Plan, Res. #67 is identified as exhibits verbal and physical behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Resident's choice regarding his/her advance directives (wishes regarding life sustaining treatment) were properly documented, ordered, and care planned for 1 of 39 residents sampled (Resident #192). Findings include: Per record review Resident #192 has an Advance Directive dated [DATE] which states the Resident does not want CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) if my heart stops, does not want a breathing machine for any length of time, and does not want a feeding tube for any length of time. Per interview with Resident #192, s/he has an Advanced Directive and does not want CPR if his/her heart stops, does not want a breathing machine for any length of time, and does not want a feeding tube for any length of time as stated in the Resident's Advanced Directives form. The Resident also showed this surveyor a Do Not Resuscitate bracelet that was applied during a recent hospitalization that they were still wearing stating that s/he had left it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received scheduled showers based on resident preference and care plan for 1 of 2 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #49). Findings include: Review of Resident # 49's care plan revealed a focus that was last revised on 11/20/2024 related to resident preferences that stated It is important for me to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. I prefer a shower as of now. Another care plan focus last revised on 10/31/24 related to resident activities of daily living states Provide opportunity for bathing preference: shower, tub bath, bed bath based on my tolerance. Tuesday/Friday, PRN [as needed]. use of bath bench with one assist. The Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) Care [NAME] (a tool that reflects the Resident care needs that is based off the Resident care plan) reflects that Resident #49 should be offered on Tuesdays and Fridays. Review of LNA documentation in the November and December 2024 in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care necessary to prevent an in-house acquired pressure ulcer for 1 of 4 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #192). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #192 was admitted on [DATE] for short term rehab with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes). cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked), muscle weakness, absence of right foot (toes), absence of left leg below the knee, and hemiparesis (partial paralysis on one side of the body). During an interview on 12/9/24 at 11:15 AM Resident #192 presented a copy of her/his care plan that the facility had given to her/him and began to review several interventions that s/he alleged were not being implemented. The Resident stated that the care plan intervention to assist patient with turning and repositioning was not being performed. The Resident also stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident # 36). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #36 has diagnoses of anemia (a lack of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), chronic kidney disease stage 5 (end-stage disease, the kidneys have lost nearly all of their ability to function and can no longer filter waste for the body). A progress note written by an on-call provider, contacted by the facility after Resident #36 had fallen, with a date of 12/1/2024, reads Recommendations: on-call provider [name omitted] gave orders for a BMP ( basic metabolic panel, a panel that measures substances in blood that reflect the body's chemical balance and metabolism), a CBC ( a complete blood count measuring red blood cells and clotting factors) and a PT/INR ( a prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, a test to help to determine if blood is clotting normally). A lab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain proper bookkeeping procedures on transactions involving personal funds that included information on when transactions occurred, what type of transaction, and ongoing balances, and failed to provide a receipt for such transactions for 1 of 3 the applicable sample, (Resident # 2). Findings include: Per record review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), Resident # 2 reported to the facility that s/he was missing money. Per a record review of the medical file, Resident # 2 is legally blind and has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating a high level of cognitive functioning. S/he has resided at the facility since 7/19/2023. Per Interview on 11/18/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, Resident # 2 conveyed that when s/he was admitted to the facility, s/he had a wallet containing $2,800.00. The facility removed the wallet to put it in a safe place. S/he has asked for and received money a few times to pay bills. Earlier this year, s/he asked for money to pay a bill and discovered approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident [Resident #1] of two sampled residents remained free from physical abuse. Findings include: The facility policy OPS Abuse Prohibition [last revised 10/24/22] states, Centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/patient (hereinafter patient) property, and exploitation for all patients .Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, injury, or mental anguish. An interview was conducted with Resident #1 on 11/18/24 at 1:30 PM. Resident #1 stated that on 8/14/24 at approximately 3:00 PM, Resident #1's roommate, who has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thought processing, and behavior) urinated on Resident #1's shoes and floor. The roommate then went through Resident #1's belongings. Resident #1 asked him/her to stop, and the roommate approached him/her and hit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Care Plan interventions were implemented for one resident [Res.#3] of 8 sampled residents Findings include: Per record review, Res.#3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis [bone infection caused by bacteria or fungi], diabetes, acute kidney disease, myocardial infarction [heart attack], hypertension [high blood pressure], and coronary artery disease [blood vessels supplying blood to the heart are blocked] and neuropathy [nerve pain]. Review of Res.#3's Care Plan reveals the resident was identified as: - Has an actual infection and is at risk for sepsis, has a history of sepsis [an infection of the blood stream] related to osteomyelitis of left foot -at risk for cardiovascular symptoms or complications related to atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension. -At risk for fluid volume excess as evidence by acute kidney failure, chronic kidney failure -Has a diagnosis of diabetes -Exhibits alterations in comfort related to chronic knee infection, amputation of toes, diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assure that residents are free from misappropriation of resident property related to personal funds for one resident (Resident #1) out of three residents sampled. Findings include: Per record review on Resident #1 has diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation (a condition that causes the heart to beat irregularly), Cellulitis (a serious bacterial infection of the skin), Hypothyroidism (a disease that causes your thyroid to release too little thyroid hormone), and Metabolic Encephalopathy (a disease that causes brain impairment). Per report from APS (Adult Protective Services) received on 7/12/24, Resident #1 gave $400 to LNA #1 (Licensed Nursing Assistant) to fix his/her vehicle that had a broken back window. An internal investigation was supplied to the surveyor. Per the investigation and witness statements, LNA #1 was approached by Resident #1 once and declined the $400. Resident #1 approached LNA #1 a second time with $400 in an envelope. LNA#1 accepted the $400 from Resident #1. A police report was made by the Adminsitrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 1 resident (Resident #1) of three sampled residents. Findings include: Per report from APS (Adult Protective Services) received on 7/12/24, Resident #1 gave $400 to LNA #1 (Licensed Nursing Assistant) to fix his/her vehicle that had a broken back window. An internal investigation was supplied to the surveyor. Per the investigation and witness statements, LNA #1 was approached by Resident #1 once and declined the $400. Resident #1 approached LNA #1 a second time with $400 in an envelope. LNA#1 accepted the $400 from Resident #1. The alleged misappropriation was overheard by a Unit Manager and was reported to APS and the state agency on 7/12/24. On 7/19/24 LNA #1 repaid Resident #1 the $400 she had accepted in an envelope. LNA #1 was terminated on 7/19/24 following the completion of the internal investigation. A police report was filed on 7/12/24. Per witness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents admitted with mental disorders are screened prior to admission to a nursing facility to determine the appropriateness of admission and the need for specialized services for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and unspecified mental disorder. Resident #1 was also prescribed an antipsychotic medication (Lurasidone) prior to admission and continued receiving it while admitted to the facility. A pre-assessment screening and resident review (PASRR) Level 1 assessment was not filled out by the discharging hospital. The exemption reason was documented as Resident #1 would be unlikely to need admission greater than 30 days. Per progress note review, Resident #1 expressed suicidal ideation to facility staff on 4/11/24 and 4/17/24. Resident #1 also eloped from the facility on 4/17/24. Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that meets their psychosocial needs for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and unspecified mental disorder. Resident #1 was also prescribed an antipsychotic medication (Lurasidone) prior to admission and continued receiving it while admitted to the facility. Per progress note review, Resident #1 expressed suicidal ideation to facility staff on 4/11/24. A social services note from this day states, This writer spoke with resident . [they] told this writer that [they] wanted to 'kill [themselves]. I can't do this anymore .' .This writer and resident discussed [their] past attempts of killing [themselves] via overdosing. Resident stated again [they] wanted to die and requested to go to the hospital. Resident #1 expressed suicidal ideation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free of misappropriation of property related to medication for one applicable resident (Resident # 1). Findings include: Per review of the facility-reported investigation documentation, on 12/30/23, the facility was running low on the Oxycodone prescription for Resident #1 and was attempting to reorder the medication. The pharmacy reported they could not fill the prescription. Their records indicated the facility had received a 30-day supply on 12/11/23, which consisted of 180 tablets. Per record review of the Controlled Substance Logbook on B wing, it was revealed that an entry on 12/11/23, page 143, at 12:55 PM, Oxycodone, was signed by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) and LPN #2. The number entered appears to be 90. However, this number is overwritten to indicate an amount of #120. The following four entries are overwritten to suggest that on 12/11 at 12:55 PM, #120 was entered instead of the original #90. Through an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement its policy and thoroughly investigate the work history of prospective staff. Findings include: Per a record review of a facility-reported incident (FRI), a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was found to be involved in an incident on 12/11/23 in which 60 tablets of Oxycodone were unaccounted for. The FRI also reveals another incident in March 2024 in which the same LPN was named as a person of interest and investigated by a different facility for discrepancies in narcotic administrations. The LPN was terminated from employment as a result. A policy titled PS 300 Abuse Prohibition, page 4, #3 states, The center will screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating patients, including attempting to obtain information from previous employers and /or current employers and checking with appropriate licensing boards and registries. Per interview with the Clinical Marketing Advisor on 3/19/2024 at approximately 3:30 PM, s/he confirmed the facility did not know about the LPN's involvement with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement a system to reconcile controlled medications consistently and accurately for one applicable resident (Resident #1). Findings include: Per review of the facility-reported investigation documentation, on 12/11/23, the facility was running low on the Oxycodone prescription for Resident #1 and attempted to reorder the medication. The pharmacy reported they could not fill the prescription. Their records indicated the facility had received a 30-day supply of 180 tablets on 12/11/23. Per record review of the Controlled Substance Log Book on B wing, it was revealed that an entry on 12/11/23, page 143, at 12:55 PM, Oxycodone, was signed by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) and LPN #2. The number entered appears to be 90. However, this number is overwritten to indicate an amount of #120 and signed by LPN #3. The following four entries are overwritten to suggest that on 12/11 at 12:55 PM, #120 was entered instead of the original #90. Those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to establish a grievance policy that ensures written grievance decisions meet documentation requirements, potentially impacting all residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled OPS204 Grievance/Concern, last revised 7/19/23, reveals that the policy does not address the documentation requirements for written grievance decisions. Although the policy does discuss the initiation of documenting the receipt of a grievance, it does not address that all written grievance decisions include the following: • date the grievance was received, • a summary statement of the resident's grievance, • the steps taken to investigate the grievance, • a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), • a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, • any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, • and the date the written decision was issued. 2 of 2 grievance forms sampled do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan in relation to wandering and elopement for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Record review reveals that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological disorder that presents with confusion, muscle movement coordination disorder, and vision problems), dementia, orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure after standing that can cause dizziness or lightheadedness), and history of falling. Progress notes reveal an elopement assessment on 8/31/2023 which determined that Resident #1 is at high risk for elopement and a Wanderguard (a monitoring device that utilizes an alarm system) would be implemented for safety. Progress notes reveal Resident #1 has repeated behavior of wandering, success with removing his/her WanderGuard, exit-seeking behavior, and a history of an actual elopement with injury resulting. A 9/3/23 note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility has sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing services to maintain the highest practicable well-being. The lack of sufficient direct care staff has the potential to affect all residents residing in the home. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for therapy and care management related to a stroke and cardiac conditions. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on 9/25/23 and passed away on 9/27/23. Per Resident #1's care plan created on 9/23/23, s/he requires extensive assistance from staff for transferring, bed mobility, dressing, toileting, hygiene, and bathing. Per interview on 10/19/23 at 4:01 PM, Resident #1's Representative indicated that Resident #1 was neglected care while at the facility because staff did not attend to Resident #1's needs. The representative explained that s/he visited the facility multiple times during Resident #1's stay for extended periods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean and comfortable environment as evidenced by debris-covered floors in resident rooms for days in a row. Findings include: Per observation on 8/28/23 at approximately 12:30 PM, the floors in resident rooms A3 and A6 were visibly dirty with copious amounts of dust, dirt, and old food crumbs. The amount of debris on the floor was indicative of several days' worth of buildup. There was a dried, crusted, dark brown stain from spilled liquid in front of A6 Bed 1's nightstand. Per observation on 8/28/23 at approximately 1:00 PM, the floors underneath the beds in room B22 had accumulated dust and debris under them. When the resident in Bed 1 was interviewed about the dirty floor at the time of the observation, the Resident stated, I've asked them to clean under my bed many times, but they won't! Per observation on 8/28/23 at approximately 4:30 PM, the floors in rooms A3, A6, and B22 were in the same state as earlier in the day. Per observation on 8/29/23 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Care Plan interventions related to diagnoses, weight monitoring, and medications for 1 resident [Res.#36] of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Res.# 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic Kidney Disease, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Retention of Urine, and Congestive Heart Failure [Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should. When this happens, blood often backs up and fluid can build up in the lungs]. (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-failure/symptoms-causes/syc-20373142),. Review of Physician Orders for Res.#36 includes an order for Furosemide Oral Tablet 80 milligrams- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for CHF. [Furosemide belongs to a group of medicines called loop diuretics (also known as water pills). Furosemide is given to help treat fluid retention (edema) and swelling that is caused by congestive heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that weights were monitored per physician orders regarding a resident identified as at risk related to diagnoses and medications for 2 residents [Res.#36 and #10] of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: 1.) Res.# 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic Kidney Disease, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Retention of Urine, and Congestive Heart Failure [Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should. When this happens, blood often backs up and fluid can build up in the lungs]. (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-failure/symptoms-causes/syc-20373142),. Review of Physician Orders for Res.#36 includes an order for Furosemide Oral Tablet 80 milligrams- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for CHF. [Furosemide belongs to a group of medicines called loop diuretics (also known as water pills). Furosemide is given to help treat fluid retention (edema)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed the pharmacist's medication regimen review recommendations, took action to address the recommendations, and documented the rationale in the resident's medical record for two of five sampled residents (Residents #6 and #13). Findings include: 1. Per review of Resident #6's record, the pharmacist identified irregularities and made physician recommendations during the months of October 2022, January 2023, April 2023, July 2023, and August 2023. There is no documentation or evidence of physician acknowledgement of the recommendations, actions taken, or a rationale for the recommendations made for the months of October 2022, January 2023, or April 2023. Per interview on 8/30/23 at approximately 10:30 AM, the Market Clinical Lead confirmed that no documentation or evidence of physician response could be found for the 3 months in question. 2. Per review of Resident #13's record, the pharmacist identified irregularities and made physician recommendations during the months of August 2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain accurate physician orders to provide necessary care and services on admission for 1 of 7 newly admitted (within 30 days) sampled residents (Resident #10). Findings include: Facility policy OPS424 Medication Reconciliation, effective 9/1/2022, states, The patient's medication orders will be reconciled at each transition of care. Medication reconciliation is the process of comparing a patient's existing medication orders to all the previous medications the patient has been taking. The process involves obtaining and maintaining a complete and accurate list of current medication use across all healthcare settings. Medication reconciliation involves collaboration with the patient representative and multiple disciplines including admission liaisons, physicians/advanced practice providers (APP), licensed nurses, and pharmacy. For patients admitted from the hospital: obtain and review copies of Medication Administration Records (MARs), Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan to include interventions and achievable goals to reach or maintain the highest practicable well-being for 2 of 27 sampled (Residents #43 & #10). Findings include: 1. The care plan for Resident #43 was not updated to include a resident-centered goal based on individual strengths, weaknesses, and personal goals regarding mental health. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, Aspergers Syndrome, and anxiety disorder. Per record review, Resident #43 has expressed feeling tired or having little energy as well as feeling down, depressed, or hopeless during MDS (Minimum Data Set, a Federal system collecting periodic comprehensive resident data) assessments done on November 16, 2022, February 6, 2023, March 12, 2023, and May 26, 2023. During an interview with Resident #43 on August 28, 2023, when asked if they attend activities they responded no and clarified when asked why I just don't like to. The care plan initiated on August 16, 2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care related to symptoms, including assessment, monitoring, and testing, for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #30). Findings include: Per interview on 8/28/23 at 1:40 PM, Resdeint #30's Representative revealed that a few weeks earlier, Resident #30 had a bad cough and had lost his/her sense of taste and smell. S/He stated that when s/he inquired with staff about testing Resident #30 for COVID 19, staff told him/her that Resident #30 did not get tested because everyone in the building has a cold right now. Review of Resdeint #30's physician orders reveals an order for Guaifenesin (cough medicine) extended release every 12 hours for 7 days for chest congestion starting on 8/10/23. There are no nursing assessments, provider assessments, or change of condition assessments documented regarding Resident #30's symptoms requiring cough medicine. There are no vital signs for monitoring Resdeint #30's condition, including temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, and oxygen saturation, in progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 27 residents sampled (Resident #43). Resident #43 was not provided with behavioral health care services despite their displayed depressed behavior and assessments indicating depression. Resident #43 was admitted in August 2022 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, Aspergers syndrome, and anxiety disorder. Resident #43 was observed on 8/28/23 at 9:30 AM, 11:30 AM, and 2 PM sitting in a wheelchair at the bedside in their room with their head down on folded arms resting on the over-bed table. On 8/29/23 Resident #43 was observed in the same place with their head down on folded arms at 9 AM and 3 PM. At 3:15 on 8/28/23 two Licensed Nursing Assistants who were familiar with Resident #43 stated [s/he] always sits like that. On 8/30/23 Resident #43 was again observed in the same place in the same position at 9:45 AM. During an interview with Resident #43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, and accessible for all residents. Findings include: Per interview with the Medical Director on 1/21/2025 at 1:35 PM, s/he confirmed that s/he did not have access to electronic resident medical records for a few days after a change of ownership of the facility on 12/18/24. Per record review, there was no electronic or written documentation of any kind for Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 12/19/24, 12/20/24, 12/21/24, and 12/22/24, including medication and treatment administration records, licensed professional notes, including nurse's progress notes, diagnostic service reports, and resident assessments. During an interview with the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) and the Facility Administrator on 1/21/2025 at 2:45 PM, they both confirmed that there was a gap in resident electronic medical records access and storage due to the transition from one owner to another taking place on 12/19/24 for all residents. The CNO stated that the gap in access and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-30 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record reviews the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge and send a copy of the notice to the Ombudsman for 2 of 2 applicable residents (Residents #17 and #42). Findings include: 1.Per record review the progress note revealed on 7/7/2023 Resident #17 experienced decreased oxygen saturation and malaise and was transferred to an acute care hospital where they were assessed and returned to the facility. There is no indication in the clinical record that staff notified the resident and/or representative or the Ombudsman regarding transfer or discharge in writing as required by regulation. 2.Per record review the progress note revealed on 8/12/23 Resident #42 experienced chest pain and was transferred to an acute care hospital where they were admitted for care. There is no indication in the clinical record that staff notified the resident and/or representative or the Ombudsman regarding transfer or discharge in writing as required by regulation. On 8/29/2023 at approximately 2 PM the acting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-30 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record reviews the facility failed to provide written information regarding the bed-hold policy for 2 of 2 applicable residents (Residents #17 and #42). Findings include: 1. Per record review, on 7/7/2023 Resident #17 experienced decreased oxygen saturation and malaise and was transferred to an acute care hospital where they were assessed and returned to the facility. There is no indication in the clinical record that staff notified the resident and/or representative of the bed-hold policy in writing as required by regulation. 2. Per record review, on 8/12/23 Resident #42 experienced chest pain and was transferred to an acute care hospital where they were admitted for care There is no indication in the clinical record that staff notified the resident and/or representative of the bed hold policy in writing as required by regulation. On 8/29/23 at approximately 2 PM the acting administrator confirmed that written information regarding the facility bed-hold policy had not been provided for either Resident #17 or Resident #42 as required by regulation.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$314,323 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $217,310 — penalty dated 2025-03-28
  • $97,013 — penalty dated 2023-08-30
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-28 for 55 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-30 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AHS VT OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 12/18/2024
AHS VT TOPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/18/2024
KURLAND, BENJAMINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/18/2024
KURLAND, NAOMIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/18/2024
ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICESOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/18/2024
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
CAREER STAFF UNLIMITEDOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/18/2024
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
CLR CONSULTING INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
REVV STAFFINGOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/18/2024
BRECHER, CHAIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
LAWAL, ALYSSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2024
STEINBRECHER, BARBARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
1248 HOSPITAL DRIVE PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
AHS VT PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
DIGACORE CONSULTINGOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.0M
Related-party expense49% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 10%Other / private 15%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 49% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$372per resident / day
operating cost
$11,299per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$344per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Vermont
$14,113/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,597/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next