Morris View Healthcare Center
540 West Hanover Avenue, Morristown, NJ 07960 · For profit - Individual · 313 certified beds · (973) 285-2800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $351,182 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-30)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.6% | 12.1% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.3% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.2% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.4% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.5% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.1% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.08 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 76.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.8%CMS range 45.2–59.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 8.2–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 74.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 64.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 6.3–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 313 beds and averages 253.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by thoroughly investigating an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse to a cognitively intact resident (Resident # 194) who reported the abuse allegation to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) on 01/01/26. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 194) reviewed for abuse. On 1/28/26 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident # 194, who stated that during the 11 PM to 7 AM shift on 12/31/25, the resident was in the day room with Resident # 158 watching the ball drop before midnight. Resident # 194 stated they got into a physical altercation with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), which included LPN #1 yelling and poking their finger in Resident # 194's face, and stomping on the resident's right foot. Resident # 194 stated that the next morning on 01/01/26, they reported what happened to the Registered Nurse (RN #1). The facility processed the resident's concern as a grievance allowing LPN #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint, #NJ157771, #NJ157773, #NJ157831 Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that on 09/21/22, the facility failed to ensure: a.) a resident with moderate cognitive impairment, who was at risk for elopement, and had a known history of wandering and exit seeking behavior was appropriately supervised and monitored to ensure safety, prevent elopement, or exiting of the building, and staff failed to follow their facility's policy and procedure on Wandering/Elopement. This deficient practice was identified for one of five residents, (Resident #206) reviewed, who had moderate cognitive impairment, and were at risk for elopement. This placed Resident #206 as well as all other residents with moderate cognitive impairment, who were at risk for or had a known history of wandering and/or elopement in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On 09/03/22, Resident #206 was able to exit the building unsupervised through an unlocked door at 10:12 AM, was found by the police, and subsequently expired on 09/03/22 at 4:19 PM. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure residents were protected from abuse including physical and verbal abuse. During the 11 PM to 7 AM shift on 12/31/25, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) got into a witnessed physical altercation with Resident # 194, which included yelling and poking their finger in Resident # 194's face and stomping on the resident's right foot. The resident reported after the altercation, they did not trust LPN #1 and they had to watch LPN #1 get their medications out of the cart before Resident # 194 ingested them, and the resident stated they could no longer go to the day room to watch television with their fellow residents because it had bad memories. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 194) reviewed for abuse, and was evidenced by the following:A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated revised 01/26, revealed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint number #169038 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) timely assess a resident after the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 9/16/23 at 01:20 AM. Subsequently, the resident had increased pain and limited mobility requiring transfer to the emergency room on 9/30/23 at 11:54 AM, with a diagnosis of acute fracture of the intertrochanteric portion of the left femur and acute fracture of the left pubic ring; b.) provide adequate pain management; c.) failed to report the injury to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #316) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: Review of the admission Record (an admission summary), indicated Resident #316 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to; COVID-19, spinal stenosis, cerebral infarction (stroke), and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the nursing progress note (PN) dated 9/15/23 at 18:40 (6:40 PM), reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint# NJ00174351 Based on interview and record review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and notify the facility of a medication irregularity for a resident. On 1/11/2024, a nurse documented a Physician order in the medical record for Resident #2 for Warfarin Sodium,( Coumadin) a blood thinner. This medication order was for another resident. Resident #2, was already on a Xarelto, a blood thinner. Resident #2 was administered the Coumadin for eighteen (18) doses from 1/12/2024 to 1/29/2024. On 1/15/2024, the CP conducted an on-site visit and had reviewed Resident #2 chart, however, there was no documented evidence for the recommendations for Coumadin and Xarelto in the report. The administration of both blood thinners caused Resident #2 to become symptomatic and decline in health. The resident eventually needed to be admitted to a acute care hospital. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of four (4) residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint# NJ00174351 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident (Resident #2) who was currently being administered daily Xarelto, a blood thinner, was incorrectly transcribed a new medication Coumadin (Warfarin Sodium), another blood thinner by Registered Nurse #1 (RN). The Coumadin medication was prescribed by a Physician for another resident (Resident #1). Resident #2 remained on prescribed daily dose of Xarelto and also received daily doses of the Coumadin from 1/12/2024 to 1/29/2024 for 18 days for a total of eighteen (18) doses . This resulted in Resident #2 to become symptomatic and decline in health. The resident eventually needed acute inpatient hospitalization. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) Resident #2 of four (4) residents reviewed for medication order transcription and administration, and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission RECORD (AR), Resident #2 was admitted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food was not expired according to professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause the spread of foodborne illness to all 256 census residents.Findings include:During initial observations of the kitchen on 01/27/26 beginning at 9:47 AM, the following was observed:-In the dry storage, three one-quart bottles of food dye displaying a manufactures expiration date of 03/27/25. The Director of Dietary (DOD) stated that those bottles should have been discarded.During an interview on 01/27/26 at 10:35 AM, the DOD stated that the three one-quart bottles were passed the use by date. The DOD stated that there was an audit of the food items completed to ensure no other food items were passed the use by date.During an interview on 01/28/26 at 9:45 AM the Registered Dietitian (RD) stated that the kitchen should not have had food items in stock that were beyond the use by date.Review of the facility's policy titled, Operation Manual-Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff, as well as himself, implemented the facility's abuse policies and procedures to ensure resident safety and well-being by a.) protecting all residents from an alleged perpetrator pending a thorough investigation for an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse; and b.) thoroughly investigating an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #194) reviewed for abuse, and was evidenced by the following: Refer F 600 and F 610 A review of the facility's Administrator Job Description, dated 12/2018, revealed the Administrator should lead and direct overall operations of the facility in accordance with customer needs, government regulations, and company policies, with focus on maintaining excellent care for the residents while achieving the facility's business objective. Monitor company identified Key Performance Indicators and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete grievances with resolution related to missing personal items after he/she was moved on 08/21/25 by the facility for one of three residents (Resident (R) 133) reviewed for missing items of 40 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the resident ability to obtain resolution to grievances.Findings include:Review of R133's undated admission record provided by the facility revealed R133 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R133's quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/26/25, located under the MDS tab of the EMR, indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 01/28/26 9:59 AM, R133 was asked about an incident that happened on third floor, when he/she moved to second floor on 07/29/25, He/she stated that all of his/her things were to be moved to his/her new room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and report an allegation of staff to resident abuse for one of five residents (Resident (R) 194) reviewed for abuse out of 40 sample residents. This had the potential to affect residents in the facility who were at risk for abuse.Findings include: Review of R194's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R194's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/25/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R194 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 01/28/26 at 1:00 PM, R194 stated during the 11 PM to 7 AM shift he/she was in the day room with R158 and R242 watching the ball drop before midnight. His/her head started hurting so he/she went to the nurse cart where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (R) 254 and R230) and their resident representatives reviewed for emergent hospital transfer out of a total sample of 40 residents were provided with a written bed hold policy and transfer notice that contained the appeal process. This failure had the potential to affect the resident and their resident representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of how to appeal the transfer, if desired, and had the potential to contribute to the possible denial of re-admission and loss of the resident's home following a hospitalization for residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include:1.Review of R254's admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R254's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/09/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistive devices were provided for one of one resident (Resident (R) 32) reviewed for assistive devices out of 40 sample residents. This had the potential to cause a decrease in the residents' dietary intake. Findings include:Review of R32's Activity Log Report, provided by the facility, dated 12/09/24 at 11:44 AM, revealed R32 was to have a metal tablespoon only Do not send small teaspoon. On 01/08/25 at 11:56 AM, it was noted in the Activity Log Report that he/she was to have no plastic utensils, 2 Large tablespoons only.During an observation and interview on 01/27/26 at 4:40 PM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 4 was observed feeding R32 and there were two regular spoons (regular dining spoon) on the tray. CNA4 stated this was the way it had been for about a week. CNA4 stated he/she had gotten the two regular spoons on his/her tray. The tray tag notes on it revealed Assist with feeding*Only the circular spoon*.During an observation on 01/28/26 at 4:51 PM, CNA4 was observed feeding R32 with two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in the implementation of enhanced barrier precautions, for one of one resident (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions during a nephrostomy dressing change. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the proper sanitization of a glucometer used to obtain blood glucose results for one of one resident (Resident (R) 90) of three residents reviewed during medication administration observation. This failure had the potential to lead to serious illness and death related to the transmission of blood borne pathogens from resident to resident via the un-sanitized glucometer.Findings include:Findings include: 1.Review of R12's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. R12's diagnoses included renal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00180247 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents on 05/06/2025 and 05/12/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation on 08/10/2024 to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) being made for a resident (Resident #1) missing items [four vapes]. This was observed in 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), Resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses which included but not limited to: Achalasia of cardia [swallowing disorder], narcolepsy with cataplexy [loss of muscle tone associated with excessive sleepiness], anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, major depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities and helps the facility identify residents' health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint#s: NJ00179392, NJ00184406, NJ00184468, NJ00180247 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 05/06/2025 and 05/12/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to: (a) update the care plan (CP) with interventions for a resident [Resident #7] when the diet consistency of was observed changed by a family member and (b) implement and revise care plan (CP) interventions for a resident (Resident #1) who was a smoker while in the facility and had history of smoking incidents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record [AR] Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Cerebral Palsy [a group of disorders that affect movement, posture, and muscle coordination due to the abnormal brain development or damage to the developing brain], Aphasia [impairment in person's ability to comprehend or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00178065 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 10/24/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the confidentiality of residents' health related information when the facility introduced to the residents the Newave Care, an external medical practice that specializes in preventive care for geriatric patients, which involved data collection and disclosure of residents' PHI (Protected Health Information). This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #8) and was evidenced by the following: On 10/24/2024, the Surveyor requested a review of the Newave Care program from facility staff. The Newave Care program documents titled, [New Wave]: Working with Your Nursing Home to Provide Extra Care provided by the facility, [New Wave ] is an external medical practice that specializes in preventive care for geriatric patients .At [New Wave ], we leverage advanced technology, including artificial intelligence (AI),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #s: NJ00176773 Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records on 10/23/24, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Licensed Registered Nurse (LPN) #1 followed: a) a physician order for a mist humidifier (a device that adds moisture to the air by releasing a fine mist or vapor) for a resident (Resident #1), b) acceptable standards of nursing practice when LPN #1 signed and initialed [indicating it was administered] on the above mentioned order in Resident #1's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) while the order was not carried out. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to a.) to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness, and b.) discard potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/08/24 at 9:34 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following: 1. The juice dispenser machine which was attached to several large juice boxes to be dispensed included: -An Unsweetened black iced tea juice box had a manufacturing label with a Best if Used by date of 5/20/2024. -A Cranberry Juice Fusion juice box had a manufacturing label with a Best if Used by date of 11/28/2023. -A thickened water nectar consistency juice box with a manufacturing label with a Best if Used by date of 4/19/2024. The FSD acknowledged the boxes should have been disposed of and could not explain why they were still in use. The boxes were disposed. 2. Dietary Aide (DA) #1 wearing drop earrings hanging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) license verification was checked for three (3) out of seven (7) licensed staff (Staff #1, #3, and #6) b.) criminal background check done for one (1) out of 10 staff (Staff #10) and c.) obtain current and past-employer reference checks for six (6) out of 10 staff (Staff #1, #3, #7, #8, #9, #10). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/17/24 at 9:00 AM, two surveyors reviewed ten randomly selected facility employee files and revealed the following: A review of Staff #1 (S#1), the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), hired 02/06/24. S#1 file did not have a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs (NJDCA) license verification printout or the copy of the license. There was no evidence of reference checks from past employers in the file. Review of S#3, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), hired 02/16/23. There was no evidence of the reference checks from past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) the residents' Attending Physician signed and dated monthly physician orders for residents under their care for one (1) of 38 residents (Resident #466) reviewed for physician order and b.) the residents Attending Physician visited and documented monthly visits or alternately visited every other month when the Advanced Practice Nurse visited on the subsequent month for five (5) of 38 residents (Resident #18, #80, #227, #257, and #466), reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/09/24 at 12:44 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #18's electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed that the resident's Attending Physician (AP) did not document any visit for March, April, May or June 2024. The Advanced Practice Nurse (APN), covering for the AP, documented an April and June 2024 monthly visit. There was not a documented AP visit for Resident #18 for the last four months and there was no visit by the APN or AP for May. 2. On 7/10/24 at 12:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices during dining observation for one (1) of three (3) dining rooms, and for one (1) of two (2) staff (Housekeeper #1 [HK#1]) and b.) follow transmission-based precautions (TBP) to prevent the potential spread of infection for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #41 and #111) and not utilizing personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident on contact precautions for two (2) of two (2) staff (Attending Physician and HK#2) reviewed for TBP, in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for a.) one (1) of three (3) residents' rooms (Resident #32) and b.) two (2) of two (2) common rooms (toilet and chapel room) This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/15/24 at 10:09 AM, the surveyor met and interviewed Resident#83. The resident requested the follow-up personal meeting after the resident council meeting with another surveyor on 7/10/24. The resident discussed the 1 A/B public toilet room safety railing was loose which Resident #83 had previously reported to the Housekeeping Director (HD) and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) via email. The resident further stated that the 1 A/B public toilet room was being used by residents. On that same date and time, the resident also mentioned the chapel where residents gather for religious services had an incident/accident a month ago with one resident (Resident #35) who had a cut on their foot and blood was all over the carpet of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served their meals in a dignified manner during meal service. This deficient practice was observed for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #105), in one (1) of three (3) dining rooms. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/08/24 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed the lunch food truck parked in front of the nursing station of 3D unit. The Concierge staff took the lunch truck into the Dining room wherein there were five residents inside the room. At that time, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) enter the 3D dining room and five residents were served lunch trays except for Resident #105. Resident #105 was seated at one table where there were two other residents. On 7/08/24 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor observed in the 3D unit dining area during mealtime the Registered Nurse (RN) came to the dining room. The surveyor asked the RN why Resident #105 had no lunch tray and was not being served at the same time as the other two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Comprehensive Assessment in accordance with the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) for three (3) of 39 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments (Residents #6, #14, and #135). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers For Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) RAI Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. At a minimum, facilities are required to complete a comprehensive assessment for each resident within 14 calendar days after admission to the facility and not less than once every 12 months while a resident, where 12 months refers to a period within 366 days. The MDS completion date for an annual assessment must be no later than 14 days after the ARD (ARD + 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for two (2) of two (2) residents, Resident #6 and #135, system selected for MDS over 120 days and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. The Quarterly assessment was considered timely if 1). The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the Quarterly MDS (QMDS) was within 92 days after the ARD of the previous MDS and; 2). the completion date was no later than 14 days after the ARD. 1. Resident #6's ARD was on 11/23/23, the quarterly assessment was not completed until 12/12/23, 19 days later, and was submitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on the interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for three (3) of the 38 residents reviewed, Residents #135, #138, and #198. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the system selected resident for MDS discrepancy and revealed the following: The admission Record (AR, an admission summary) showed that the resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis that included but was not limited to inclusion of body myositis (an inflammatory condition of the muscles that causes weakness), adjustment disorder with depressed mood, ulcerative colitis (a chronic, inflammatory bowel disease that causes inflammation in the digestive tract), and functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty caused by another medical condition). A review of Resident#135's Quarterly MDS (QMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an assessment reference date (ARD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint: NJ#169038 Based on the interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) follow the physician's orders for one (1) of 38 residents, Resident #106, with regard to medications with parameters, and b.) specify a site for a pain medication patch for one (1) of one (1) resident, Resident #316 reviewed for pain management according to standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with an accurate discharge summary at the time of discharge, including a documented medication reconciliation, post-discharge instructions, and physician's prescription per the facility policy. The deficient practice occurred for one (1) of one (1) closed records reviewed (Resident #106) for appropriate discharge. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/09/24 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical records of Resident #106 and revealed the following: Resident #106's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cellulitis (a serious deep infection of the skin caused by bacteria) of the right lower limb, hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone) unspecified, major depressive disorder recurrent unspecified, unspecified sequelae of other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure a.) that the unwitnessed fall investigation included a conclusion for root cause analysis and b.) a new non pharmacological intervention was implemented after each fall for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls (Resident #227) according to standards of clinical practice and facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's order, b.) ensure respiratory tubing, cannula, and masks were stored properly. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #111 and #466) reviewed for respiratory care according to the standard of clinical practice, and the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the daily posting of licensed nurses, certified nursing aide staffing, and the resident census on three (3) of 10 days during the survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On Monday, 7/08/24 at 9:00 AM, upon entry into the facility, the surveyor observed a Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) which was posted in the reception area of the lobby. The NHRCSR posted for day shift was dated 7/07/24. There was no NHRSCR posted for 7/08/24 day shift. On Tuesday, 7/09/24 at 8:40 AM, the surveyor observed the NHRCSR posted in the lobby. The NHRCSR posted for day shift was dated 7/08/24. There was no NHRSCR posted for the 7/09/24 day shift. On Friday, 7/12/24 at 8:55 AM, the surveyor observed the NHRCSR that was posted in the reception area of the lobby. There was an NHRCSR dated 7/10/24 for the evening shift, 7/10/24 for the night shift, and 7/11/24 for the day shift. There was no NHRCSR posted for the 7/12/24 day shift. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored securely and appropriately. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of three (3) medication carts observed during the medication pass observation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/10/24 at 9:03 AM, the surveyor observed the medication (med) nurse assigned to the South Side of the 2A Unit (med RN) prepare and administer medications (meds) to an unsampled resident. The surveyor observed the med RN remove the resident's med cards (packaging that contains individual doses of med in a numbered plastic blister) and place them on top of the med cart. The surveyor observed the med RN remove the ordered meds from the med cards for administration to the resident, verify the med, then return the med card to the cart after removing a dose. The surveyor observed the med RN return the med cards that had doses removed to the med cart and then lock the cart. On that same date and time, the surveyor observed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ#00163219, NJ# 00164434 Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a discharged resident a requested copy of their medical records. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical record requests. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission record, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in December of 2022, with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Myasthenia Gravis (weakness and rapid fatigue of muscles under voluntary control) and Anxiety. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/28/2022, indicated Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility provided Release Authorization Information from Medical Records form revealed that Resident #1 and their daughter signed the request form on 1/27/23. On 9/11/23 at 12:34 PM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ00161074 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was identified that the facility failed to provide a sanitary and homelike environment on 1 of 6 units toured (2 D) for 3 of 13 resident rooms (Resident #11, #13 and #14). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/08/23 at 12:38 PM, during the initial tour of unit 2 D, the surveyors observed a brown, cloth recliner chair in Resident #13's room. The recliner had multiple areas of dark brown and circular stains on the arms, back rest, seat, and leg rest. There was an unused adult brief on the seat of the chair. Resident #13 was not in the room at the time of the observation. On 09/08/23 at 12:40 PM, in the presence of the surveyors, the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) stated that Resident #13's recliner chair should not be that way. She further stated that the chair should be kept clean for infection control and dignity purposes. When the surveyors asked if she would sit in the recliner chair, the RN/UM stated no she would not. The RN/UM stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REFER TO F610 REFER TO F609 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was identified that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) and follow facility policy and procedures for reporting: a.) an unwitnessed event which resulted in a major injury for Resident #75, b.) an allegation and investigation of a resident to resident altercation, for Residents #27 and #228, c.) an allegation of abuse made by a resident representative for Resident #99, d.) an injury of unknown origin for Resident #99, and e.) an observed incident and investigation in which serious bodily injury occurred to Resident #191. The deficient practice was identified for five (5) of six (6) residents reviewed for alleged violations, (Resident #27, #75, #99, #191, and #228) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/08/22 at 11:28 AM, the surveyor interviewed the responsible party (RP) for Resident #75 in the presence of a second surveyor. The RP informed the surveyors that Resident #75 sustained a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REFER to 609 Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that facility failed to conduct a timely and through investigation, as well as, follow their own facility policy on Abuse Investigation and Reporting was consistently implemented for five (5) of six (6) residents (Resident #27, #75, #99, #102 and #228) reviewed for alleged violation investigations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 11:28 AM, the surveyor interviewed the responsible party (RP) for Resident #75 in the presence of a second surveyor. The RP informed the surveyors that Resident #75 sustained a right hip fracture which required surgery. The RP stated that this occurred the day after Resident #75 had an incident whereby his/her finger got caught in the bed frame which Emergency Services (ES) were required to release by cutting the metal bed frame. The RP stated that Resident #75 was sent to the hospital for evaluation of the finger and that the resident complained of pain the next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess and properly code residents' status in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 39 residents (Residents #13, #69, #102, #106, #177, #198 and #206) reviewed under Section C for cognition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CMS's (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Version 3.0 Manual dated October 2019 Section C: Cognitive Patterns included Coding Tips .If the resident interview was not conducted within the look-back period (preferably the day before or the day of) the ARD (Assessment Reference Date), item C 0100 must be coded 1, Yes, and the standard no information code (a dash -) entered in the resident interview items. 1. During an observation on 8/31/22 at 10:54 AM by the surveyor, the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) was inside the resident's room while providing morning care to the resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was identified that the facility failed to: a.) follow the Physician's Order (PO) for the use of oxygen equipment b.) appropriately store portable oxygen tank to the back of resident wheelchair and c.) store respiratory equipment in a way to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice was identified for three of three residents' reviewed for respiratory care, (Resident #111, #159 and #191) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor observed Resident #111. 1. On 9/01/22 at 11:32 AM, the surveyor observed the resident sitting in their high back wheelchair in their room watching TV. The surveyor observed an Oxygen (O2) concentrator in Resident #111's room next to Resident #111's bed. The O2 concentrator was running and set at two (2) Liters and Resident #111 was wearing their nasal cannula. The nasal cannula and humidification bottle were not labeled and dated. The surveyor also observed a portable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure that a.) medications that were ordered by the physician were available for administration during the months of April, May, and July 2022 for one (1) of 18 residents, (Resident #99) reviewed for medication management, b.) medications were observed as accurately and timely administered to one (1) of seven (7) residents, (Resident #121) reviewed for medication administration, and c.) a treatment medication was accurately administered and properly stored for one (1) of two (2) residents, Resident #69, reviewed for treatment medications. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to document non-drug interventions that were attempted and the need for an as needed psychoactive medication (Ativan) to be administered according to documented behaviors from April, May, June and July. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #101) reviewed for unnecessary medications, and was evidenced by the following: On 9/1/22 at 11:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #101 in a wheelchair in the Day Room. The resident waved the surveyor over to him/her. The resident stated that he/she wanted to get up and would then be able to walk out of the room. At that time, a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) came over to the resident and asked if the resident would like to be taken somewhere else. On 9/1/22 at 11:26 AM, the CNA stated that the resident was confused and unable to stand on their own and often asked to be taken home. The CNA added that the resident had a behavior of yelling and does get anxious but was able to redirect the resident. On 9/2/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 6 units, (Unit 1 D and 2 A) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On the 1 D unit the surveyor observed the following: - On 9/9/22 at 10:53 AM, the surveyor observed on 1 D unit hallway (that covered both the high and low side), black colored stains on the floor and on the walls. - On 9/9/22 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed missing wall tiles in multiple areas of the 1-D hallway. - On 9/9/22 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor observed the unit D shower area (the only available shower room on 1-D) and observed the shower head on the shower stall floor. - On 9/9/22 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor observed a large dark stain on the tile floor of the 1-D shower stall. - On 09/09/22 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor observed the ceiling of the main shower room with rust marks and chipped paint that was right above where the residents' shower. - On 09/09/22 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide information and educate residents on the Grievance process. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #44, #51, #67, #150, and #15) interviewed for the grievance process at the Resident Council meeting conducted on 9/15/22 at 10:30 AM and was evidenced by the following: On 9/15/22 at 10:40 AM, during the resident council meeting with five alert and oriented residents, the surveyor asked the residents if they were aware of what a grievance was and how to file a grievance with the facility if necessary. Five of the five residents present during the meeting told the surveyor they did not know the definition of a grievance or how to file a grievance. When the surveyor reviewed the resident council meeting minutes for June, July, and August 2022, prior to having the resident council meeting, the facility did not provide information regarding grievances. On 9/15/22 at 3 PM, the surveyor reviewed the Resident admission Packet which did not contain any information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed a.) to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan intervention with regard to communication and b.) to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address a behavior. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 39 residents reviewed for care plans, (Residents #102 and #150), and evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/31/22 at 11:02 AM, the surveyor observed Resident#102 laying on the bed with the responsible party (RP) at the bedside. The RP stated that Resident#102 was cognitively intact, unable to speak appropriately but able to utilize the personal computer for communication. The RP further stated that he/she had a concern that the 11-7 staff think Resident#102 was cognitively impaired because Resident#102 was unable to talk properly due to ALS (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a rare neurological disease that primarily affects the nerve cells responsible for controlling voluntary muscle movement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise an Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Care Plan (IDCCP) to include interventions for 1 of 11 residents, (Resident #121), reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/13/22 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #121 who was alert, oriented, and seated in a wheelchair watching television. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #121. The admission Record reflected that Resident #121 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), bi-Polar illness (condition of mood swing from depressive lows to manic highs), major depressive disorder (long term loss of pleasure and interest) and anxiety disorder (disorder of feeling worried and fear). A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 6/30/22, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately transcribe a physician's order for a wound treatment to a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer onto the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #181) reviewed for wound care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/09/22 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #181 lying in bed with head of bed elevated and bed covers on and up to Resident #181's waist. Resident#181 was awake and watching television. A review of Resident #181's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated that Resident #181 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the insulating covers of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord are damaged. This damage can result in decreased vision, muscle weakness, and trouble with sensation and coordination.), peripheral vascular disease (a condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to limbs), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 39 residents, (Resident #159 and Resident #177), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/13/22 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #159 physician progress notes in the electronic medical record (EMR). In review of the physician notes the surveyor noted that all the resident's progress notes were written by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN). The surveyor could not locate any notes written by the attending physician within the medical record. The surveyor then asked the Director of Nursing (DON) to provide all the resident's physician progress notes for July and August. The surveyor reviewed the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/13/22. Medical diagnoses included cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a condition involving constrictions of the airways and difficulty or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that appropriate hand hygiene was performed by 2 of 13 staff observed during dining and wound care observation, and b.) disinfect the table for 1 of 2 staff observed for wound treatment in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for infection control and facility policies. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Hand Hygiene Recommendations, Guidance for Healthcare Providers for Hand Hygiene and COVID-19, page last reviewed 1/8/2021 included, When to Perform Hand Hygiene? Multiple opportunities for hand hygiene may occur during a single care episode. Following are the clinical indications for hand hygiene: Use an Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer: Immediately before touching a patient .Hands should be washed with soap and water for at least 20 seconds when visibly soiled, before eating, and after using the restroom. Immediately after glove removal . 1. On 9/9/22 at 12:29 PM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$351,182 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $185,663 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
- $116,184 — penalty dated 2024-07-24
- $49,335 — penalty dated 2024-06-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRIEDLAND, SHALOM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 11/01/2017 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315303. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.