Morristown Post Acute Rehab And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 630 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 287 beds and averages 205.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 82 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure implementation of interventions designed by the physical therapist to stimulate functional performance and prevent further decline. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) resident reviewed for positioning and mobility (Resident #88) and was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/25 at 11:31 AM, during the initial tour of the second floor, the surveyor entered Resident #88's room. The resident was awake, alert, pleasant and had a breakfast tray in front of them with built up utensils (an adaptive eating utensils designed with molded plastic handles to assist individuals with limited or weakened grasping strength). No additional assistive device was observed on the resident. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #88. According to the admission Record, an admission summary, reflected that Resident #88 reflected diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (PD; a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0742 — pattern
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #159) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: On 6/23/25 at 12:54 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #159 in bed and was reluctant to discuss their experience in the facility for fear of retaliation. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #159. According to the admission record, an admission summary, reflected that Resident #159 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, anxiety disorder and (PTSD). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/28/25 reflected the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  4. The surveyor interviewed Resident #134 on 6/19/25 at 12:16 PM. The resident was seated in an armchair at the bedside and told the surveyor they received hemodialysis three times a week. A review of the electronic medical record revealed the following information. The 4/19/25 admission MDS assessment tool indicated the resident had no cognitive deficits as evidenced by a BIMS score of 14 of a possible 15. The June 2025 Order Summary Report included a 4/14/25 physician's order for Midodrine oral tablet (medication used to raise blood pressure) 5 mg. twice a day for hypotension (low blood pressure) hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) above 130 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A review of the April, May, and June 2025 Medication Administration Records included documentation by the administering nurse that Midodrine was administered 10 times when the SBP was above 130 mmHg or when a blood pressure was not documented. The surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager on 6/25/25 at 10:21 AM. She confirmed nurses must follow the parameters for Midodrine to be held when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the prior year's State of New Jersey (State) inspection results in an area that was readily accessible to residents, families, and the public. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor held the resident council meeting and 4 of 5 residents, who were in attendance, voiced that they did not know where the survey results were located. 1 of 5 of the resident's stated that they thought the survey results were at the receptionist desk. On 6/24/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor could not locate survey results near the receptionists desk and could not locate them throughout he facility and the receptionist stated that they did not know where the survey results were located. On 6/24/25 at 1:40 PM, the Surveyor met with Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) and surveyor voiced concerns that previous years survey results could not be located. The LNHA stated the results were at the reception area desk and that they were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dish sanitation recommendations, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dish machine and 1 of 1 three-compartment sink were utilized in accordance with FDA guidance to minimize the potential for foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the low-temperature dish machine achieved recommended temperatures, failed to ensure sanitizer testing supplies were not expired, and failed to maintain the chemical concentration of sanitizer in the three-compartment sink. The failed practices had the potential to affect 194 residents who received meals from the dietary department out of a total census of 199 residents. Findings included: Chapter 4 of the U.S. FDA 2022 Food Code indicated, 4-501.110 Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Wash Solution Temperature (B) The temperature of the wash solution in spray-type warewashers that use chemicals to sanitize may not be less than 49°C [Celsius] (120°F. [Fahrenheit]). The Food Code also specified, 4-501.114 Manual and Mechanical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, facility policy review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality, Safety and (&) Oversight Group (QSOG) memoranda, the facility failed to ensure CDC guidance and the facility's infection prevention and control (IPC) policies were promptly and consistently implemented, as evidenced by: 1) failure to ensure staff donned the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while caring for 3 (Residents #1, #2, and #3) of 3 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP. 2) failure to ensure staff donned the appropriate PPE when entering the room to deliver and set up a meal tray for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions and failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene between delivering meals to Residents #4, #5, and #6. 3) failure to ensure a vaccination was promptly administered after consent was obtained for 1 (Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0773 — pattern
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00178715 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility's pertinent documentation on 11/06/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders for laboratory services performed on 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for laboratory services and physician orders. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), Resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that included but not limited to: Urinary Tract Infection, Hydronephrosis with Renal and Urethral Calculous Obstruction, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, and Congestive Heart Failure. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities, dated 04/09/2024, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident's cognition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT # NJ176547 CENSUS: 192 SAMPLE SIZE: 3 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care and double diapering a dependent resident who required staff assistance. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence (Resident #2) and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage without loss of Consciousness, [NAME] Syndrome, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Persistent Vegetative State, Cerebral Stroke Syndrome, Gastrostomy Status, Tracheostomy Status, Essential Primary Hypertension. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 6/4/2024, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating that Resident # 2's cognition was unable to be assessed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the need for a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a screening which looks for indicators that a person may have intellectual disability, related disability, or serious mental illness) when a resident had a new diagnosis of mental illness for one (Resident (R) 23) of three sampled residents in a total sample of 42. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving necessary services. Findings included. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs) and major depressive disorder. The resident did not have diagnosis of Alzheimer and/or dementia. Review of the Medical Diagnosis list located in the Medical Diagnosis tab of the EMR revealed the following mental illness diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review-a screening process for residents who have indicators of intellectual disability, related disability, or serious mental illness) was followed for one (Resident (R) 43) of three sampled residents in a total sample of 42. The facility failed to ensure a PASARR Level 1 was corrected to include serious mental illness to determine if a Level II (a more in-depth screening) was required. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving the mental health services needed and placed him at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episode of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs.) and adjustment disorder with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ