No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Center For Rehab & Nursing Washington Township

535 Egg Harbor Road, Sewell, NJ 08080 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 190 certified beds · (856) 557-0105 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Feb 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$248,425 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $248,425 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-10)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
400 Medical Center Drive, Suite F
Pharmacy
468 Hurffville-Crosskeys Rd · (856) 716-6149 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
475 Hurffville-Crosskeys Rd · (856) 582-6330 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Veterans Park Washington Township Nj · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
362 Ganttown Rd · (856) 589-3366

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.0%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.3%12.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.2%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.5%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.4%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.7%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.162.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.471.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 876 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 335 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.8%CMS range 61.0–66.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 10.6–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 6.8–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
1.35
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
55.7%
Total nursing turnover
25.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 150.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-10)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2026-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate and complete a thorough investigation after a cognitively impaired resident made an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #123) reviewed for abuse.During an interview on 2/3/26 at 10:11 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1), revealed Resident #123 made an allegation of physical abuse about one week ago and that CNA #1 reported the allegation to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) who didn't want to get involved. CNA #1 admitted she did not notify anyone else of the allegation after receiving that response from the LPN. On 2/3/26 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #123 who at first stated they were unable to recall the incident. The resident then stated, I can't honestly say, too much time has gone by, but I did get a couple punches from her. The resident then stated that CNA #1 probably knew who the perpetrator was and that the incident happened less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ184057 Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 03/05/2025 and 03/06/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) obtain a Physician's Order for a wound care recommendation which resulted in worsening of the wound; b.) implement recommendations from the wound care consultant to prevent worsening of facility acquired pressure injury. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident #4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Resident #4 was identified as having a skin alteration within the sacral region on 01/23/2025. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) failed to transcribe the verbal order obtained for wound care. On 01/28/2025 during a wound consult, Resident #4's sacral wound measured 2 centimeters (cm) x 2 cm x 0.5 cm and progressed to 3 cm x 3 cm x 1 cm on 02/04/2025. Review of Resident #4's Order Summary Report (OSR) from 01/23/2025 through 02/04/2025 showed no evidence for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/29/26 at 11:43 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), conducted a spot-check of dishes in the large dining area prior to meal service. Three (3) 8 ounce (oz) blue coffee cups with brown debris and one (1) black bowl with white debris were observed. The surveyor donned a glove on her right hand and used a white paper towel to inspect the interior surfaces of the dishes intended for service. Upon inspection, brown debris from the three (3) 8 oz blue coffee cups transferred onto the white paper towel. On 1/30/26 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed, on the 200 Unit pantry, that the refrigerator freezer contained an open, exposed package of three lemon-flavored glycerin swab sticks (pre-moistened sticks used to moisten the mouth). On the floor between the unused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently administer pain medication according to the physician's order and Consultant Pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 1/29/26 at 1:15 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 sitting in his/her room. When asked about pain, the resident stated that he/she has chronic pain in both shoulders and arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain and stiffness). The resident reported that pain is typically seven (7) out of ten (10) but is manageable with as needed medication. Resident #4 also stated that he/she receives oxycodone when pain reaches seven (7) or above. On 1/29/26 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #4 and the following was revealed: A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that Resident #4 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: Dementia with mild…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment that was clean, safe, and sanitary. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 units (200 and 300 units).Complaint # 2578091 This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/30/26 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed the following on the 200 Unit. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bedroom window had a thin linear crack across the windowpane, allowing air to pass through, and the walls contained multiple areas patched with white spackling. In the hallway, several areas were also patched with white spackling, and a drop ceiling tile was brown-stained. Above the shower room entrance door, a crack was noted, and above the nursing supplies room entrance door, two cracks were present and covered with white spackling. In the shower room, one shower stall had white debris on the shower bed, and items stored on the floor included, but were not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2026-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: 2731697 Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure residents were protected after a cognitively impaired resident made an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #123) reviewed for abuse. The evidence is as follows:Refer to F610 The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #123. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to; insomnia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 11/15/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IIDR2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report within two hours to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of abuse after a cognitively impaired resident made an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #123) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F600 and F610 The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #123. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, insomnia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/15/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan that was comprehensive and individualized for 1 of 30 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/29/26 at 12:19 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 sitting in his/her room. The resident stated he/she was on a long-term use antibiotic and had no concerns. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #3. According to the admission Record, an admission summary, Resident #3 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, fusion of spine, bacterial pneumonia, and osteomyelitis of vertebra (bone infection of the spine). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/16/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to adjust medication administration times to accommodate for scheduled dialysis times for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #116) reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/29/26 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #116 sitting in his/her room. The resident stated he/she went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #116. According to the admission Record, an admission summary, the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 12/29/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS included the resident received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (services for the safe management of medications in a healthcare setting) in accordance with professional standards to ensure that a rationale was documented when a medication was not administered for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #149) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2026-02-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff, as well as himself, implemented the facility's abuse policies and procedures to ensure resident safety and well-being by ensuring an allegation of physical abuse was reported, and a thorough investigation was initiated after a cognitively impaired resident made an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #123). The evidence is as follows:Refer to F600 and F610A review of the Administrator's Job Description included; Summary: Lead and direct the overall operations of the facility in accordance with government regulations and company policies. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: Monitor each departments activities, communicate policies, evaluate performance provide feedback and assist, observe, coach, and discipline as needed; Oversee regular rounds to monitor delivery of nursing care.and ensure resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint#: NJ182815 Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation on 3/5/2025 and 3/6/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for residents that included access to clean linens. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 nursing units observed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During a tour of the 500 Unit on 3/5/2025 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor asked what the resident census was on the unit, and the Resource Nurse/Registered Nurse (Resource/RN) stated 30 residents. At 11:36 AM, the surveyor toured the 500 High Hallway Linen Room and observed four wash cloths on the shelf. At 11:38 AM, the surveyor toured the linen room for the 500 Low Hallway Linen Room and observed three wash cloths on the shelf. The surveyor reviewed the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 12/19/2024, 1/3/2025, and 1/30/2025 which revealed resident complaints on the lack of linens available for resident care. On 3/5/2025 at 1:07 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Housekeeper (HK) who was working in the laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ184057 Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation on 03/05/2025 and 03/05/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a resident's care plan, specifically for a newly identified wound, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans, (Resident #4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Anemia (low healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin), Depression (feeling of sadness), and Muscle Weakness. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 01/12/2025, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Section M0100 revealed no pressure ulcer. A review of Resident #4's Care Plan (CP) initiated on 01/06/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ184057 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents on 03/05/2025 and 03/05/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure the treatment cart was secured during wound care observation, b.) initial, date, and time a dressing prior to applying on a resident (R#4) in accordance with professional standards of clinical practice. The facility also failed to follow its policies titled Storage of Medications and Wound Care This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident observed for wound care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint#: NJ182815 Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation on 3/5/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that food items were dated, b.) ensure outdated food items were discarded, and c.) ensure refrigerator temperatures in the kitchen were completed to prevent foodborne illnesses. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/5/2025 from 10:08 AM to 10:40 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD), observed the following during a tour of the kitchen: 1. On the bread rack, the surveyor observed: - an unopened loaf of sliced rye sandwich bread with a use by date of 2/22/25. - an opened gluten free white wide slice bread with a use by date of 2/11/25. -an opened bag of 8 English muffins with no label and no expiration date. 2. The surveyor observed a temperature log sheet outside the walk-in refrigerator that had a blank space for 3/4/2025, for PM temperatures. 3. The surveyor and DD entered the walk-in refrigerator that contained milk and juice. The surveyor observed a cart in the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ184057 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents on 3/5/2025 and 3/6/2025, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices specifically by not properly discarding an opened pack of unused 4x4 gauze after a wound care observation to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease and Control prevention guidelines and Standards of Clinical Practice. The facility staff failed to follow their policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program. This defiant practice was identified during 1 of 1 wound care observation. On 3/5/2025 at 12:00 P.M., the surveyor observed the Registered Nurse (RN#1) complete a wound care treatment. Upon completion of the wound care, RN#1 was observed gathering and returned an opened pack of unused 4x4 gauze and placed it in the treatment cart. On 03/05/2025 at 12:45 P.M., during an interview with RN#1, she stated the opened pack of unused 4x4 gauze from the resident's room should have been discarded and not placed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ182815 Based on observations and interviews on 3/5/2025 and 3/6/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure their wireless call bell system communicated calls directly to the staff. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, sarcoidosis (an inflammatory disease of the lungs and lymph nodes), and hypertension. A review of resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/28/2025, revealed a Brief Interview of mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The MDS further revealed the resident was dependent for toileting hygiene. On 3/5/2025 at 11:21 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident # 1 in the presence of the resident's family member. The resident stated he /she was admitted to the facility several weeks ago.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #'s: 168276, 169388, 173735 and 174353 Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure all residents reached their highest practical wellbeing by failing to: a) provide timely incontinence care to 1 out of 4 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, and (b) sufficient nursing staff for 5 of 5 weeks of staffing prior to the recertification survey date of 11/22/24. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to S0560 1.) On 11/19/24 at 11:04 AM, the surveyor observed the resident #47 lying in bed with his/her eyes closed. observed resident in bed. The surveyor observed the resident's family member at the bedside. The family member repositioned Resident #47 and showed the surveyor Resietn #47 incontinence brief which was saturated with urine and urine had leaked onto the cloth underpad. The resident's family meember stated that the resident was usually washed, dressed, and up in their wheelchair by this time. At 11:08AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was identified in the facility's kitchen and 5 of 5 pantries designated for resident food, and was evidenced by the following: On 11/88/24 from 9:16 AM to 10:26 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and observed the following: In the Walk-in Freezer: 1. one box containing French toast inside a plastic bag that was not closed and the French toast was open to the air. 2.One 10-pound box of veggie burgers inside a plastic bag that was not closed, and the burgers were open to the air. At that time, the FSD stated that the French toast and the veggie burgers should be closed and wrapped. On 11/19/24 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor accompanied by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) observed the following in the 200-unit pantry: a) the freezer did not contain a thermometer b) the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the garbage container area free of garbage and debris. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/14 at 10:06 AM, during initial kitchen tour with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the trash company at the dumpster area. The surveyor observed the debris, trash, leaves around the enclosed dumpster area. The dumpster area included four (4) blue dumpsters and one (1) black dumpster container for used oil. The surveyor observed five (5) black trash bags lying directly on the ground next to the first dumpster and one (1) black trash bag lying directly on ground next to third dumpster. At that time, the surveyor, in the presence of the FSD, interviewed the driver of the trash company who stated that he had just moved the (5) black trash bags that were lying in front of the dumpster directly on the ground to the side of the dumpster so he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' dining experience was provided in a manner to promote dignity and respect of the residents. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 6 dining areas observed, (the Activities room) and was evidenced by the following: On 11/19/24 at 11:59 AM, the surveyor observed dining on the first-floor activities room. The surveyor observed two (2) residents (Resident #22 and Resident #94) sitting at the same table. Resident #94 had their lunch tray and was eating. Resident #22 had not received their lunch tray. At that time, the surveyor interviewed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN # 2) who stated that residents who were seated at the same table should have been served their lunch at the same time. At 12:02 PM, LPN #2 stated that she had called the kitchen to obtain Resident #22's lunch tray. At that time, the surveyor observed Resident #22 take a piece of brownie from Resident # 94's plate and ate it. Then, Resident #94 tried to feed a forkful of broccoli to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document a resident's life-sustaining treatment preference on the physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #52) reviewed for advanced directives and was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/24 at 11:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #52. There was no documented evidence of the resident's code status. A review of the admission Record, (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included: heart failure, depression, obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. A review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/3/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. On 11/20/24 at 11:25 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ169388 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health and the Office of the Ombudsman in a timely manner in accordance with state and federal requirements and the facility policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #199) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F610 A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, generalized anxiety disorder, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, unspecified urinary incontinence, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. A review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 12/10/23, included the resident had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ169388 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation in accordance with the facility policy for an allegation of staff to resident abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #199) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F609 On 11/18/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #199. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, generalized anxiety disorder, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, unspecified urinary incontinence, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. A review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ173651 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's individual comprehensive care plan after a resident developed contractures for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/17/24 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 lying in bed. The resident's left hand appeared contracted. On 11/18/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, and muscle weakness. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/23/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ173651 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care to a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/24 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 lying in bed. The resident's left hand appeared contracted and the fingernail on the resident's left middle finger was long in length and jagged. On 11/18/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, and muscle weakness. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/23/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ173651 and NJ174353 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with meaningful activities that reflected the resident's preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for activities. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/18/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, and muscle weakness. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 4/25/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed it was important for the resident to do things with groups of people and that the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) notify the physician of an injury sustained by a resident, b.) obtain a physician's order for a wound treatment, and c.) document a skin assessment in accordance with the facility policy and professional standards of nursing practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #78) reviewed for skin conditions and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ173651 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure floor mats were in place for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 10/17/24 at 10:16 AM and 10/18/24 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 lying in bed. On both observations, there were no floor mats on either side of the resident's bed. On 10/18/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, and muscle weakness. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/23/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed a.) to provide a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- a machine used to keep breathing airways open during sleep) to accommodate the respiratory needs of a resident upon admission to the facility, b.) ensure the CPAP was stored in accordance with professional standards when not in use, and c.) ensure the individualized comprehensive care plan included CPAP therapy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #52), and the evidence was as follows: On 11/17/24 at 11:10 AM, during the initial tour, Resident #52 was observed sitting upright in the wheelchair with their eyes closed. At that time, the surveyor observed a CPAP machine and face mask on top of the nightstand and the face mask was not properly stored inside a plastic bag. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included: heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the daily Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report was posted and displayed in a place that was readily accessible to be viewed by both residents and the general public as indicated on the report. This deficient practice was identified on 5 of 5 nursing units and was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/24 at 9:37 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report posted on the receptionist's desk in the front main lobby. A pass code was required to be entered into a keypad on the wall to gain access to the locked double doors that led to the nursing units. The surveyor toured the facility and did not observe the daily Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report posted on any of the five nursing units. On 11/21/24 at 2:10 PM, when the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) where the staffing report was posted she stated that it was posted at both entrances to the facility. When asked if the staffing report was available…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during the provision of a wound treatment. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 1 nurse (400 Unit) observed during the provision of wound care to 1 of 1 resident (Resident #62) and was evidenced by the following: On 11/17/24 at 11:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #62 lying in bed on an air mattress. On 11/18/24 at 12:27 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #62. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: osteomyelitis (a bone infection), unspecified, type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness (generalized), need for assistance with personal care and pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage 4 (four) (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle). A review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/31/24, included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to store, label, and date potentially hazardous food, and maintain kitchen sanitation in a manner intended to limit the spread of food-borne illnesses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/02/23 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor entered the facility kitchen and toured with the Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyor observed 3 crates of milk that had no expiration dates printed on each milk. The FSD confirmed there were 75 milk cartons in each crate for a total of 225 milk cartons that had no expiration dates and confirmed the facility uses the First in, First out method and the dates should have been checked upon delivery before being stored in the refrigerator. On that same day at 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed 4 packs of bread on the countertop that were all unlabeled. The FSD stated the bread was brought out to be used today. There were 2 bags of partially used hamburger buns, 1 pack of partially used hot dog buns, and another bag was found on the bread rack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice by a.) not obtaining a physician's order for a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) machine setting prior to application. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #188) reviewed for skin conditions, b.) not clarifying physician orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, (Resident # 56), and c.) not completing weekly skin assessments as ordered by the physician for 9 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident #38, #12, #8, #69, #78, #97, #68, #37, and #89) This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings were held with the required members in attendance for the past four quarters. On 08/04/23 at 1:45 PM, the surveyor requested all quarterly sign-in sheets for QAA meetings for the past four quarters. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) stated that there were no sign-in sheets or proof of attendance as staff attended the meetings remotely via ZOOM (online platform). The LNHA further stated that since the facility recently changed ownership, she no longer had access to her emails and was unable to furnish the surveyor with documented evidence of staff meeting attendance or topics that were discussed. The LNHA stated that if the lack of documentation resulted in a deficient practice so be it, as she did not have access to any type of proof of QAA meeting attendance. On 08/14/23 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor interviewed the LNHA who stated that she began working at the facility in September of 2022. The LNHA stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility records it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control protocols in a manner that would decrease the possibility of the spread of infection by a.) not performing hand hygiene in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and facility policy during wound care and b.) during the distribution of resident meal trays. This was observed for a.) 1 of 1 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for wound care and b.) 5 of 7 nursing staff observed on 2 of 4 nursing units during resident meal pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a.) On 8/2/23 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #68 in their room sitting in a wheelchair while being visited by a family member. The family member introduced themselves to the surveyor as the resident's daughter-in-law (family member) and informed the surveyor that they are the resident's caregiver at home prior to admission to this facility. They further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy and promote dignity during resident assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #24) reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/07/23 at 12:53 PM, the surveyor entered the dining room and observed the Nurse Practitioner ask Resident #24 several questions regarding his/her health and then bent down to examine Resident 24's feet. This was done in the dining room in the presence of other residents and staff and while Resident #24 was sitting at the table eating lunch directly across from another resident. The surveyor interviewed the Nurse Practitioner who confirmed that Resident #24 should not have been examined in the dining room and should have been seen in his/her room for privacy but the NP did not want to disturb his/her lunch. According to the admission Record Resident #24 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the proper required Skilled Nursing Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) for 2 of 3 residents (#107, #86) reviewed for facility change notifications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/04/23 at 1:24 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the surveyor with a list of residents who were discharged from the facility within the last six months and should have received Beneficiary Notices. The surveyor reviewed two of the residents (#107, #86) listed who were discharged from a Medicare Part A (helps cover skilled nursing facility care including rehabilitation services) stay at the facility and were documented as having a discontinuation of their Medicare Part A insurance payment to the facility. Resident #107 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023. The last documented day of coverage for Medicare Part A service was on 05/01/23. The facility did not present the resident with the proper required SNFABN form to notify them of the termination of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 assessment after a resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARRs (Resident #42) and was evidenced by the following: On 08/06/23 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 (a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) which was negative, meaning the resident did not have any mental illness diagnoses or changes. At the same time, the surveyor reviewed the admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool (MDS), dated 2021. Under the diagnoses section I, the surveyor noted that the resident did not have any mental or psychiatric diagnosis. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in April 2021. Review of the resident's most recent MDS indicated the resident had medical diagnosis which included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 22 residents reviewed for resident-centered care plans (Resident #69), and was evidenced by the following: On 8/2/23 at 11:09 AM the surveyor observed Resident #69 in his/her room with the left fingers contracted. Resident #69 asked where the brace for his/her hand was and stated the staff usually place it on the left hand. On 8/03/23 at 09:04 AM the surveyor observed Resident #69 with left fingers contracted and no brace observed on the left hand. Subsequent observations made on 8/4/23 at 11:14 AM, 8/7/23 at 12:47 AM, and 8/8/23 at 10:45 AM of Resident #69 with no brace on the left hand. The surveyor reviewed Resident #69's medical record which revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but was not limited to hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following a stroke. The surveyor reviewed Resident #69's care plans dated 1/29/20 which include that this resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed a.) to provide a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure, a machine used to keep breathing airways open during sleep) to accommodate the respiratory needs of a resident and b.) to follow the physician's order (PO) and provide the correct setting on the oxygen (O2) machine to accommodate the respiratory needs of a resident. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #188 and #89). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/07/23 at 1:12 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #188 who was seated on the side of the bed. The resident voiced concern that there had been a delay in receipt of a CPAP machine that was allegedly ordered upon the resident's admission to the facility. Review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: Obstructive sleep apnea (intermittent airway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ00166725 Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that received medications were appropriately labeled and dated by the providing pharmacy and to check medication expiration dates prior to administering a medication. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 1 resident reviewed for intravenous nutrition (Resident #288) and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #288 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which revealed Resident#288 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 06:40 PM from an acute care facility. Review of the Physician Orders (POS) indicated the resident was ordered nothing by mouth (no eating or drinking) and had an order for Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) which was total intravenous nutrition, to be infused at 100 milliliters per hour intravenously in the evening daily for until a total of 1800 milliliters was infused. The TPN was ordered by the physician and sent to the outside pharmacy on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to document behaviors on a resident receiving psychotropic medications. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behaviors (Resident #42) and was evidenced by the following: On 08/02/23 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #42 sitting in the dayroom being assisted with lunch. On 08/07/23 at11:42 AM, the surveyor reviewed the physician orders which showed the resident was prescribed Risperidone, an antipsychotic, Paxil, an antidepressant, and Trazadone an antidepressant and sedative. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in 2021. Medical diagnoses included, but not limited to hypertension (high blood pressure), failure to thrive, and arthritis of the left hip. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 99, meaning the resident could not respond to the cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly secure a wound treatment cart containing medications while unattended during wound care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #68) reviewed for wound care, and b.) store medications according to facility policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a. On 8/2/23 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #68 in their room sitting in a wheelchair while being visited by a family member. The family member introduced themselves to the surveyor as the resident's daughter-in-law (family member) and informed the surveyor that they are the resident's caregiver at home prior to admission to this facility. They further informed the surveyor that the resident had an ulcer on (his/her) bottom. On 8/3/23 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #68 being wheeled back to their room in a wheelchair by the family member. Once back in the resident's room, the family member informed the surveyor that the resident's wound is most likely a pressure ulcer but was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to notify CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and receive authorization for a change in the facility's name in accordance with 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 424.516. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to 42 CFR 424.516 Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare Program: (a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. (2) Compliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services or supplies the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$248,425 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $139,750 — penalty dated 2026-02-10
  • $108,675 — penalty dated 2025-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KURLAND, BENJAMINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/07/2023

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-51.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$839K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 33%Other / private 28%

This home reported $839K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$520per resident / day
operating cost
$15,818per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$343per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315231. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next