No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Center for Living & Rehabilitation

160 Hospital Drive, Bennington, VT 05201 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (802) 447-1547 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$57,038 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,038 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-16)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
140 Hospital Dr · (802) 447-5519 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
194 North Street · (802) 442-2240 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
475 Main St · (802) 440-0663 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Prospect Mountain Cross Country Ski Area · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%19.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.6%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%2.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.6%13.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.9%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.1%5.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.7%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.5%16.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.9%5.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.5%26.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.8%19.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.6%78.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%22.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%17.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.461.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.422.881.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 347 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 163 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.3%CMS range 58.5–68.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 9.1–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.3–8.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
57.6%
Total nursing turnover
26.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 120.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.71 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-08)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from physical and verbal abuse from another resident for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility did not implement effective interventions to prevent recurrence after a prior altercation on 8/7/25, nor did it update care plans to address ongoing risk. On 9/17/25, Resident #1 sustained blunt trauma to the nose with bleeding after being struck by Resident #2 during a physical altercation, and Resident #1 expressed feeling unsafe and distressed in his/her home. This deficient practice resulted in actual physical harm and psychosocial harm. Findings include:Per record review, the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 10/15/25 reveals that Resident #1 has a BIMS score (Brief Indicator for Mental Status, a test to check if thought processes are intact) of 15 out of 15, indicating cognition is intact. Resident #1 has diagnoses that include anxiety disorder and major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) after significant changes in condition related to two resident-to-resident altercations. Despite an initial incident on 8/7/25 and a subsequent altercation on 9/17/25 resulting in Resident #1 sustaining blunt trauma to the nose and expressing fear and distress, the facility did not update either resident's care plan or Kardex to include interventions to prevent recurrence, such as separation or monitoring. Staff interviews confirmed reliance on informal redirection rather than documented interventions. This failure resulted in actual physical harm and psychosocial harm to Resident #1. Findings include:Per record review, the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 10/15/25 reveals that Resident #1 has a BIMS score (Brief Indicator for Mental Status, a test to check if thought processes are intact) of 15 out of 15, indicating cognition is intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision related to smoking for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #15). Additionally, the facility failed to monitor the storage of Resident #15's lighter and cigarettes. This is a repeat deficiency, with the violation being cited during the past two recertification surveys dated 4/30/25 and 3/27/24. Findings include:Per record review, Resident # 15 is care planned for smoking, revised on 7/28/25. Resident #15's care plan goal is to not smoke without supervision. Care plan interventions include educating the resident on the facility's policy about smoking locations, times, and safety concerns.Per observation, at approximately 12:55PM on 4/7/26 a person is sitting in a wheelchair, outside the entrance to the facility smoking a cigarette. There are no observed staff members outside.Per interview with the Receptionist at 12:57 PM on 4/7/26, the resident outside was Resident #15, and s/he is permitted to sit outside without staff supervision.Per interview 4/7/26 at approximately 1:03 PM with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 residents in the sample were treated with dignity and respect (Resident #1). Findings include:Per observation on 12/30/2025 at approximately 4:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) was observed answering Resident #1's call bell. Resident #1 requested pain medication. LPN #1 addressed the resident as Boo three different times within their interaction.Per interview with Resident #1 on 12/30/2025 at 4:34 PM, Resident #1 stated my name is (proper name omitted), it's not Boo and I don't know why (LPN #1) would call me that. Per interview with LPN #1 on 12/30/2025 at 4:52 PM, they stated Resident #1''s nickname is not Boo it's just a figure of speech and it's what I call everybody.Per interview on 12/30/2025 at approximately 7:45 PM with the Administrator (ADM), she stated that it is not appropriate to address residents with terms of endearment and that staff should address the residents by their preferred name or pronoun.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain control was provided for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include chronic pain syndrome and osteoarthritis (a diagnosis affecting joint cartilage causing pain swelling and stiffness of the affected joints). Resident #1 has a BIMS [Brief Interview for Mental Status] score of 14, dated 10/7/25, indicating cognitive function is intact.Per observation on 12/30/2025 at 3:10 PM, Resident #1 vocalized with increased volume help. At 3:13 PM, LNA (Licensed Nursing Assistant) #1 entered the room. Resident #1 stated that they wanted to get into bed and that their back hurt. LNA #1 told Resident #1 they needed to stay up in their chair for dinner.Per interview with Resident #1 at 3:46 PM on 12/30/2025, s/he stated that s/he had asked a staff member to lie down in bed because of their back pain and that s/he was told s/he needed to stay up for dinner. Per observation at 3:53 PM, three staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that of 1 of 4 sampled residents had access to the call bell in their room (Resident #1). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that include chronic pain syndrome, morbid obesity, lymphedema, (Lymphedema refers to tissue swelling caused by fluid that's usually drained through the body's lymphatic system. It most commonly affects the arms or legs, and severe cases of lymphedema can affect the ability to move the affected limb), and osteoarthritis (a diagnosis affecting joint cartilage causing pain swelling and stiffness of the affected joints). Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with a reference date of 10/07/2025 revealed Resident #1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 indicating Resident #1 is cognitively intact.Per observation on 12/30/2025 at 3:10 PM Resident #1 was sitting in a wheelchair in their room, facing the window and vocalized with increased volume help. The call bell was observed pinned on the top sheet of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents in the applicable sample, (Resident #1) were free from accidents and hazards, causing the Resident to sustain a skin tear. Per record review on 7/4/2025 Resident #1 was found by staff in bed with a large skin tear on her/his right lower leg. Resident #1 had a care plan focus of ADL (activities of daily living) self-care deficit with a transfer status of 2 staff assist that was implemented on 10/20/2024. Per review of the facility's internal investigation, it states that Resident #1 was care planned for a 2 person stand pivot transfer to all surfaces and for Dermasaver skin tubes (used to protect skin from injury) to always be on when out of bed. The Dermasavers are to be removed only when s/he has been safely transferred back into bed. The investigation further states that Resident #1 had been out of bed in their wheelchair for dinner and was assisted with her/his meal by a nurse. The next time Resident #1 was observed was back in bed by their primary Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident did not develop an avoidable pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1). Findings include:Per record review Resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a short discharge to home. A Clinical admission Note reflects that s/he was admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer on her/his left heel. There is no mention of any wound being present on the right heel. Review of the Resident's care plan reveals a Focus dated 5/15/2025 of actual impairment to skin integrity. A Nurse Progress Note dated 6/2/2025 states This writer noted that resident had blood on right sock. Noted to have area to right heel. Supervisor made aware, and came to assess. Family made aware. Another Nurse Progress Note dated 6/2/2025 states resident has a open area on his right heel, supervisor [name omitted] assessed area, 5x5 cm broken blister noted red inner tissue surrounded by white soft tissue with dark pink edges,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Per record review of Resident #80's medical record reveals that Resident #80 had medical diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and/or paralysis) following a cerebral infarction (a stroke) affecting his/her right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (a communication disorder that affects how individuals produce and understand language), and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). Per record review of Resident #80's care plan states, [Resident #80] has had actual falls r/t [related to] gait/balance problems, psychoactive drug use, right side weakness, and increased behaviors after family leaves. Most falls out of bed are to [his/her] right.Per record review of the facility's Fall Prevention and Protocol policy [modified 4/26/24] states, Every resident admitted to [the facility] will have a fall risk evaluation .after each fall.Per record review of a nursing progress note written on 4/23/25 states, At approximately 330 am [sic], CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] notified other CNA and myself that the resident was lying face forward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 3 of the 4 medication carts observed, and 2 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Findings include: 1. During observations on 4/30/25 at approximately 9:40 AM on the [NAME] Unit, the nurse poured all the residents medications and put them all in the top drawer of the medication cart and stated he was going to get water. He walked away from the medication cart with the water pitcher and left 4 blister packs of medications, 3 bottles of OTC (over the counter) medications, and a bottle of metamucil on the top of the medication cart. Per interview with the nurse on 4/30/25 at approximately 9:45 AM, he confirmed that he had left these medications on top of the medication cart unsupervised and improperly stored. 2. During observation on 4/30/25 at approximately 3:15 PM, the medication storage room on the [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During observation on 4/29/25 at approximately 9:30 AM of medication passes on the [NAME] Unit, a male nurse pouring/pushing tablets from a blister packet (a form of tamper resistant packaging where an individual pushes individually sealed tablets through the foil in order to take the medication) for Resident #108 into his ungloved hand and then placed these medications into a medication cup and administered them to the resident. The nurse did not perform hand hygiene prior to preparing Resident #482's medications in which he again poured/pushed tablets from a blister packet directly into his ungloved hand and then placed these medications into a medication cup and administered them to the resident. During interview on 4/30/25 at approximetly 9:45 AM, the nurse confirmed that he had poured medications from the blister pack for 2 residents into his ungloved hand. He stated that it was his understanding he was not allowed to wear gloves in the hallway. The nurse confirmed that he did not perform hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Residents' power of attorney (POA) was assisted with developing advanced directives consistent with their wishes for 1 of 40 residents in the sample (Resident #40). Findings include: Per record review Resident #40 signed a notarized advanced directive on 11/22/16. The notarized advanced directive states If I suffer a condition from which there is no reasonable prospect of regaining my ability to think and act for myself, I want only care directed to my comfort and dignity, and I authorize my agent to decline and terminate all treatment (including artificial nutrition and hydration) the primary purpose of which is to prolong my life. If the situation should arise in which I am in a terminal state and there is no reasonable expectation of my recovery, I direct that I be allowed to die a natural death and that my life not be prolonged by extraordinary measures. I do, however, ask that medication be mercifully administered to me to alleviate suffering, even though this may shorten my remaining life According to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a nutritional problem was given nutritional supplements and appetite stimulants as ordered by a physician for one resident [Resident #106] of 7 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Per review of Resident #106's medical record, the resident's diagnoses include cancer of the prostate and bone, and difficulty swallowing. Review of the resident's Care Plan reveals the resident is identified as at risk for malnutrition as I have increased nutritional needs with cancer treatment and altered skin integrity, poor appetite and intake, need for protein/nutritional supplement. Care Plan interventions include Provide me with my supplement as ordered: 8oz House Shake, 8oz Boost VHC and provide further nutrition interventions. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #106 include House shake in the afternoon for at risk for malnutrition and Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension-Give 10 milliliters by mouth in the morning for Appetite stimulant. Review of Resident #106's Medication Administration Record [MAR]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain drug regimen reviews for one out of five sampled residents (Resident #88). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #88 had MRR [Medication Regimen Review] (a monthly review by the pharmacist for any medication recommendations made based on safety and patient specific diagnoses). Resident #88 had medication recommendations made from the pharmacist in June 2024, August 2024, September 2024, October 2024, December 2024, February 2025, and March 2025. Per record review of Resident #88's chart the resident did not have copies of MRRs for the months of June 2024, August 2024, and September 2024. Per record review of Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review-CLR policy [no revised or reviewed date] states, Facility: 1. Shall maintain all Drug Regimen Review recommendations along with prescriber's responses in an easily retrievable location for presentation to surveyors, upon request. 2. Shall file or drug review recommendations with the permanent medical record for each resident after one year. 3. Shall file the findings under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services to ensure residents have a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 4 of 6 resident units. Findings include: An interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Maintenance [DM] on 2/12/25 at 10:26 AM. The DM reported that the facility utilizes a 'TELS' electronic system [TELS is a software program that facilitates maintenance work orders by allowing users to scan, upload, and access related work orders and repair history]. The DM reported that the facility uses the TELS to identify, report, acknowledge, assign, track, and complete facility maintenance issues and repairs. The DM stated that all staff in the facility have access to system and can access it through a computer or phone, and that all staff, including the DM, received education on using the system in the last month [January 2025]. A tour of the facility and interview was conducted with a facility staff member on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice including prevention of complications from the resident's medical condition for 1 of 2 residents in the applicable sample [Resident # 1]. Findings include: Per record review, Res. #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetic neuropathy [neuropathy is nerve damage that affects the hands and feet, often caused by diabetes or other conditions. Feet and other areas that lack sensation can become injured without the person knowing]. Review of the resident's Care Plan revealed the resident was identified upon admission on [DATE] as having an actual impairment to skin integrity including a right plantar [sole] foot wound. Review of Res.#1's medical record included a 'Clinical Evaluation' dated 12/18/24 which identified the right foot wound as present on admission but now resolved-wound healed and/or closed. Review of 'Skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services to ensure residents have a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 6 of 6 resident units. Findings include: Per observation on 11/20/24 from 12:10 AM to 12:30 PM, all nursing units (Stark, [NAME], [NAME], Frost, [NAME], and [NAME]) needed multiple functional and cosmetic repairs in several resident rooms. * room [ROOM NUMBER]- There was a double electrical outlet receptacle and cover that was broken. One of the top plugs in the receptacle was also broken exposing the electrical wiring. There were two cords plugged into the bottom receptacles. A bulletin board had been removed from the wall and there was a large square of brown paint where the bulletin board had been. There were two pieces of plywood used as a wall covering, both boards were delaminating, exposing splintered wood. * Walls in rooms R6, R13, R11, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C10, 102, 103, 113, 115, 120, and 126 had unrepaired holes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement policies for screening employees by not completing the required criminal background checks for 4 out of 5 sampled staff. Findings include: Facility policy titled Background Checks, Arrests, and Conviction Notification, last revised on 3/4/2024, indicates that the facility will conduct criminal background checks for all current employees at least annually. Per review of employee human resource files, 4 of 5 sampled direct care staff who have worked at the facility for over a year do not have annual federal background checks completed. Per interview on 3/20/24 at 11:45 AM, the Human Resource Staff explained that there is no system in place for obtaining annual national background checks for staff that have been here over a year but has worked with the Administrator to implement completing annual background checks in starting in June.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions (GDR), unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the drugs for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #13); failed to ensure that there was a specific diagnosis/condition documented in the medical record for psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #100); and failed to ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs are accurately monitored for behaviors and medication side effects (Residents # 13, #100, and #30). Findings include: Facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, last modified on 10/2/2022, states, Psychotropic medications should only be given when necessary to treat a specific diagnoses and documented condition. GDR will be attempted using the following guidelines and limits (unless clinically contraindicated): 1. For all psychotropic medications: within the first year following admission or initiation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all residents were treated with respect and dignity by all staff for one of 29 sampled residents (resident #87). Findings include: Per interview on 3/19/24 at approximately 2:00 PM, Resident #87 stated that about a month ago a staff member swore at them during an interaction. They stated that the interaction upset them at the time, but that they worked it out and there is no ongoing concern with the Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA). Per record review, Resident #87 has a care plan for [Resident #87] can be verbally aggressive, yelling at staff, swearing at staff, and gestures aggressive towards staff r/t Poor impulse control initiated on 5/6/23. Per an MDS assessment on 1/10/24, Resident #87 has a Brief Mental Status Score of 15 (high congnitive function). Per review of the incident documentation from the facility, the LNA confirmed that they swore at the resident during an interaction in which Resident #87 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of significant weight loss for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #100). Findings include: Record reveals that Resident #100 has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, hypothyroidism, and dementia. Resident #100's nutrition care plan states that s/he remain at risk for malnutrition in view of need for nutrition supplementation, created on 7/29/23 and has the following goal, My weight will be stable within 125-135 lbs, revised on 12/8/23. Interventions include, Monitor my weights and labs as available, created on 7/29/23, and Notify my MD of any significant weight changes PRN [as needed], created on 7/29/2023. Resident #100's care plan includes interventions for monitoring, documenting, and reporting weight changes in relation to hydration status and thyroid medications. Record review shows that Resident #100 weighed 126.4 pounds on 2/5/2024. The next weight documented for Resident #100 was 105.8 pounds on 3/8/2024. This weight loss of 20.6 pounds, over approximately one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for 1 resident [Res.#101] of 2 sampled residents regarding abuse allegations. Findings include: Per review of the facility's Investigation Summary of an incident involving Res.#101 on 2/17/24, the Witness Statement by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) present reveals on 2/17/24, a staff member was witnessed accusing Res.#101 of tampering with their ostomy appliance, causing the resident's eyes to tear up. The resident stated they didn't touch it but the staff member continued as if it were [Res.#101's] fault. The witness statement continues As [Res.#101] lay naked on the bed with poop all over [her/him], [Staff member] berated [her/him]: again, tears welled up in [Res.#101's] eyes. After the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment did not occur after an allegation of abuse for 1 resident [Res.#101] of 2 sampled residents regarding abuse allegations. Findings include: Per review of the facility's Investigation Summary of an incident involving Res.#101 on 2/17/24, the Witness Statement by an LPN present reveals on 2/17/24, a staff member was witnessed accusing Res.#101 of tampering with their ostomy appliance, causing the resident's eyes to tear up. The resident stated they didn't touch it but the staff member continued as if it were [Res.#101's] fault. The witness statement continues As [Res.#101] lay naked on the bed with poop all over [her/him], [Staff member] berated [her/him]: again, tears welled up in [Res.#101's] eyes. After the staff member left the room, Res.#101 told the LPN That [wo/man] has been accusing me all week and stated it makes me feel like crap. The LPN's witness statement is dated 2/17/24 at 11:25 PM. A review of the LPN's Supervisor's statement, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented a resident's individualized comprehensive care plan related to fall prevention for 1 of 29 residents in the sample (Resident #266). Findings include: Per observation on 3/18/24 at approximately 3:00 PM, Resident #266 had multiple bruises on their face in varying degrees of healing. Per record review, Resident #266 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after sustaining a significant fall at their Senior Living facility. Resident #266 sustained a fall on 3/12/24 in their bedroom and a second fall on 3/17/24 in the nurse's station after breakfast. Per Resident #266's care plan, it included a focus for [Resident #266] has had an actual fall with minor injury, to [their] face with bruising prior to admission. An intervention was placed on the care plan on 3/19/24 after the second fall in the facility, which states lay resident down after meals. Per observation on 3/20/24 at 12:15 PM, Resident #266 was being fed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise Care Plans regarding prevention of future falls for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Res.#62). The facility also failed to ensure that the Resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team for one of 79 sampled residents (Resident #79). Findings include: 1.) Per review of Res.#62's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include Parkinsonism, dementia, muscle weakness and a history of falling. Review of the facility's 'Fall Prevention and Protocol' policy [last modified 3/11/22] reads Every resident admitted to [the facility] will have the Fall Risk Evaluation done for the first 24 hours of admission or readmission . and after each fall. Upon admission, Res. #62 scored a '21', with the facility policy listing If the score is 10 or greater, the resident/patient is considered to be at HIGH risk for falls and should be evaluated by the interdisciplinary care team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident/representative interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living without assistance receives the proper level of assistance for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident #100). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #100's care plan states that s/he has potential for impairment to skin integrity [related to] dementia, incontinence, with the intervention to Avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture. Keep fingernails short, created on 10/20/23. Per observation on 3/18/24 at 3:44 PM, Resident #100 is in bed, wearing just a brief on his/her lower body. His/her nails are very long nails and appear to have a dark brown substance underneath most of the nails. S/He is tugging at his/her brief and groin area. Per observation and interview on 3/20/24 at 1:40 PM, a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) confirmed that Resident #100's nails were very long and dirty and explained that they should be shorter because s/he scratches himself/herself. S/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in making audiology appointments for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #71). Findings include: Record reveals that Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per his/her care plan, initiated on 9/2/2021, Resident #71 has a communication problem related to a hearing deficit. Per interview on 3/18/2024 at 1:32 PM, Resident #71 requested that this surveyor speak loudly because they are hard of hearing and needs hearing aids. Resident #71 explained that s/he was frustrated because s/he has been trying to get new hearing aids for a while. S/He had an audiology appointment on Friday that was canceled by the provider and s/he hasn't heard any follow up on when it is rescheduled for. Record review reveals a care plan meeting note dated 1/31/2024 indicating that Resident #71 needs an appointment to get new hearing aids. A 3/15/24 progress note confirms that Resident #71 did have an appointment with audiology early that morning but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of Accident hazards regarding implementing interventions to reduce hazards and risks and monitoring for effectiveness related to falls for Res.#62, and regarding falls with a possible brain bleed for Res.#266, 2 of of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: 1.) Per review of Res.#62's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include Parkinsonism, dementia, muscle weakness and a history of falling. Review of the facility's 'Fall Prevention and Protocol' policy [last modified 3/11/22] reads Every resident admitted to [the facility] will have the Fall Risk Evaluation done for the first 24 hours of admission or readmission . and after each fall. Upon admission, Res. #62 scored a '21', with the facility policy listing If the score is 10 or greater, the resident/patient is considered to be at HIGH risk for falls and should be evaluated by the interdisciplinary care team for identification and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status as evidenced by the facility failing to obtain weights as care planned and identify weight loss for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #100). Findings include: Facility policy titled Weight Assessment Monitoring, last modified on 3/11/2022 states, Nursing staff weighs resident/patient per nursing protocol weekly, or as ordered for the first 4 weeks after admission. If resident/patient is identified to be at risk for weight loss/gain, weights may be continued weekly and reviewed by Interdisciplinary Care Team for appropriate intervention. 1. Record reveals that Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, hypothyroidism, and dementia. Resident #100's nutrition care plan states that s/he remain at risk for malnutrition in view of need for nutrition supplementation, created on 7/29/23 and has the following goal, My weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a personal history of trauma for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #30). Findings include: Per observation on 3/18/2024 at 4:18 PM, Resident #30 was seen lying in his/her bed, awake, with the covers pulled to his/her chin. S/He was crying in his/her bed; when asked if s/he was okay, Resident #30 appeared afraid and was weeping while s/he tried to explain concerns s/he had about his/her mother and father and their skin. S/He repeated incoherent phrases about the skin of her father and the skin of her mother and how s/he needed to get it to them and they would not be happy. When asked if s/he would be eating dinner in the dining room, s/he explained that s/he would very much like to go into the dining room. His/her voice was shaky when speaking and continued to weep while she spoke. Per observation on 3/19/2024 at 2:25 PM, Resident #30 was in bed crying. On approach, s/he appeared distressed and was sobbing about his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident #266) as evidenced by administration of an anticoagulant for a resident with a brain bleed. Findings include: Per resident #266's record, Resident #266 sustained a fall on 3/12/24 at approximately 5:40 PM. The fall was unwitnessed, and Resident #266 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. Per a nursing progress note from 3/13/24 at 7:32 AM, the emergency room nurse called to report that the Resident has a brain bleed that was 3mm in diameter, and that they were unable to determine if it was a result of the fall or not. Per a documented secure conversation note on 3/13/24 at 11:52 AM, Resident #266's physician sent a message at 7:14 AM stating [Resident #266] has a small intracranial hemorrhage (brain bleed), stable on second CT (cat scan) 6 hours later. We'll be holding anticoagulation . In the same documented secure conversation note there is an additional message from the facility NP sent at 11:52 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medical record contains documentation that indicates that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 immunization before receiving the vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #100). The facility also failed to ensure that each eligible resident receives the COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #6). Findings include: 1. Per record review, resident #100 received the Fall 2023 COVID-19 immunization on 3/20/2024. There is no evidence in the record that Resident #100 or their representative was provided education regarding the benefits or side effects of the immunization. Per interview on 3/20/24 at approximately 4:30 PM, the facility's Infection Preventionist confirmed that no documentation could be located in the record to validate that Resident #100 was provided education regarding the benefits or side effects of the immunization prior to vaccination. 2. Per record review,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) in the applicable sample were treated with dignity and respect related to refusal of care. Per record review Resident #3 is frequently resistive and combative, which includes fighting, yelling, screaming, punching, pinching, and kicking staff during episodes of care. Review of nursing progress notes reveals that staff continue to provide care to Resident #3 even when s/he is resisting and refusing care. A care plan focus initiated on 2/11/21 states that the resident is at risk for a behavior problem r/t severe agitation history secondary to Alzheimer's and bipolar disease. [S/He] does threaten to bite staff at times . Can be combative with care . There are no specific interventions for staff to implement related to combativeness with care. A fall risk care plan focus revised on 6/15/23 does reflect an intervention of If [name omitted] is being resistive and or combative with care please make sure [s/he] is safe and leave the room and re approach [him/her]. Review of Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow a care plan and to revise a care plan for 1 out of 4 Residents sampled (Resident #1). Findings include: Per record review resident #1 has the following medical diagnoses, Alzheimer's Disease, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. A progress note written on 8/5/23 reflects that after lunch Resident #1 was the aggressor in a resident-to-resident altercation. Resident #1 was sitting in the lobby waiting for his/her spouse to arrive. Staff who were assisting another resident witnessed Resident #1 strike another resident. Staff then intervened and redirected them from each other. A current care plan revised on 6/30/2023 reveals that Resident #1 has a behavior problem and requires 1:1 when out of room. The care plan includes the following interventions: 1) Direct monitoring (1:1) when out of room; 2) Deer Oaks (psychiatric services) consult; 3) Avoid lobby prior to meals . Resident #1's August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflects an order with the start date of 7/5/23 that states 1:1 close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, Interview, and Record review the facility failed to assess and provide mental health services for 2 of 4 residents sampled (Residents #1 and #2). Findings include: 1. Per record review on 08/05/23, Resident #1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation as the aggressor in the altercation. A review of the care plan revealed Resident #1 had an intervention in place for a consult with Social Services and psychiatric services as indicated for a behavior modification plan, and another intervention for Deer Oaks services (Mental Health Counseling service) for support. Upon further review, Resident #1 did not have a physician order for Deer Oaks services and there was no documentation found that Resident#1 had received these services. Per interview with the facility social worker on 9/25/23 at 1:00 PM, it would be expected that there would be a Physician order for Deer Oaks and then a referral would be made. Social Services confirms that Resident # 1 does not have an order for Deer Oaks and the services have not been initiated. Per interview on 9/25/23 5:40 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,038 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $57,038 — penalty dated 2025-12-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BN MEMBER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST80%since 06/01/2021
MOUNT ANTHONY HOUSING CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/01/2021
SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCAREOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2021
SVVHC - HOOSICK FALLS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2021
KURLAND, BENJAMINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 20%Other / private 80%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$436per resident / day
operating cost
$13,261per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$445per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Vermont
$14,113/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,597/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475029. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next