No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Beaumont

4195 Milam Street, Beaumont, TX 77707 · Government - Hospital district · 214 certified beds · (409) 842-4550 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$39,563 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $39,563 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4004 College St · (409) 840-4004 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs0.2 mi
3595 College St · (409) 835-1788 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2445 S 11th St · (409) 833-0811 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3785 Milam St · (409) 951-6700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.4%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.5%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.2%13.4%21.2%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.7%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.262.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.412.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 5.9–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.6–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.14
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.08
RN hoursweekends
49.5%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 214 beds and averages 104.4 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 110 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-20)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 2 of 3 residents (Resident # 47, Resident #87, and Resident #106) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 was free from sexual abuse when Resident #106 touched her face, hair, and breast area inappropriately on 05/28/2025. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87 was free from physical abuse when Resident #87 and Resident #106 had a physical altercation on 06/05/2025. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 05/28/2025 and ended on 06/05/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of care, and further abuse. Findings included: Resident #47 Record review of Resident #47's face sheet, dated 06/18/2025, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with more recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 resident (Residents #87 & #106) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision. 1. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision on the facility's memory care unit, to prevent Resident #87, who had severe cognitive impairment from wandering into Resident #106 room at approximately 4:00 a.m. on 06/05/25. 2. The facility did not implement interventions to include adequate supervision prior to the incident or following the incident for all residents at risk for injuries related to wandering behaviors. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/19/25 at 4:50 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:08 p.m While the IJ was removed on 06/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility was continuing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR Level II determination and PASRR evaluation report into the resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 2 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for PASRR services. -The facility failed to submit a complete and accurate request for nursing facility specialized services in the LTC Online Portal within 20 business days after the date of the Interdisciplinary Team meeting from 09/23/2025. This failure could place residents who have a mental health diagnosis, developmental disability, or intellectual disability at risk from not receiving services identified by the IDT in a timely manner. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/10/2026 indicated a [AGE] year-old male with a readmission date of 03/14/2025 with diagnoses of encephalopathy (a group of disorders that affect the brain and cause altered mental state), dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), bipolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents with loss of bladder control receive treatment or services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for incontinent care. (Resident #1) The facility failed to provide Resident #1 assistance with timely incontinence care from 09:30 a.m. until 01:45 p.m. on 10/06/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth, skin breakdown, and infection.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/06/2025, indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/19/2025, indicated Resident #1 had severe impairment of cognition abilities with a BIMS score of 05. Resident #1 was noted to be dependent on staff for toileting, showering, and lower body dressing. Resident #1 required substantial/max…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for controlled medications. The facility did not have documentation on Resident #1's July 2025 and August 2025 MARs indicating she was administered her Lorazepam (controlled antianxiety medication) prn when it was signed out on the controlled medication count sheet. The controlled medication count sheet did not indicate the medication doses were wasted. This failure could place residents at risk for medication overdose, medication under-dose, ineffective therapeutic outcomes, and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of the physician orders for August 2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to hold Losartan per parameters stated in physicians' orders for a total of 8 doses in July 2025 for Resident #1. The facility failed to hold Metoprolol per parameters stated in physicians' orders for 4 doses and Clonidine per parameters stated in physicians' orders for a total of 9 doses in July 2025 for Resident # 2. These failures placed the residents at risk of harm or not receiving desired outcomes from medications not administered according to physician's orders and manufacturer's specifications.Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for laboratory services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, also known as CMP (a blood test that checks for a wide range of substances in your blood, including proteins, enzymes, electrolytes, and minerals), Complete Blood Count also known as CBC (a blood test that measures amounts and sizes of your red blood cells, hemoglobin, white blood cells and platelets), carcinoembryonic antigen also known as CEA (blood test measures the level of a specific protein in the blood, primarily used to monitor certain types of cancer), Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone also known as TSH (blood test to assess level of thyroid stimulating hormone and thyroid function and metabolism) and Thyroxine test also known as T4 (blood test that helps diagnosis thyroid conditions) was drawn every 14 days as ordered. This failure could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events caused the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #3 and #4) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The facility failed to report physical abuse and verbal abuse to the State Agency within 2 hours when it was reported to DON/delegated abuse coordinator Resident #3 threw a TV remote at Resident #4 causing a laceration to Resident #4's nose on 07/26/2025 at 7:48 p.m. and Resident #3 made a statement regarding needing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure 4 of 4 dryers were working in safe operating condition. This failure could place the residents at risk not receiving their clothes in a timely manner. Findings included: During a group interview on 06/17/25 at 8:59 a.m., 6 alert and cognitive intact residents. Residents said the facility had building sprayed a couple weeks ago. Resident # 17 and Resident #15 said the linen was dingy, and they have had a hard time getting linen for their beds. They said the sheets did not fit the beds properly and had holes in linen or were thin. Resident # 26 said they need new linens and towels without stains. During an observation on 06/17/25 at 10:00 a.m., the Laundry Supervisor said all 4 dryers were broken as she pointed to the broke dryers. During an interview on 06/17/25 at 11:15 a.m., CNA L said the linen closet did not have linen right now…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 residents out of 21 residents reviewed for environmental concerns in their rooms, 2 of 3 linen closets for adequate linen, 2 of 3 Halls for intact windows and courtyard for environment. 1. The courtyard used by the residents was unkempt and had tall grass, and weeds, and had trash in the weeds and in the bushes. 2. Resident #36 and Resident #41 rooms had an unrepaired trim and wall with missing paint and deep gouges in the sheet rock. 3. Linen closets were not stocked with white linen and linen was discolored with stains, and thin, and worn. 4. Hall 100 and 200, next to the exit door, had broken glass pane with cardboard and tape. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe. Findings included: 1. During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 3 errors out of 27 opportunities, resulting in an 11.11% percent medication error involving 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication pass. (Resident #28) LVN P administered Primidone (used to treat tremors) at 7:50 a.m. (the physician ordered Primidone be given daily at hour of sleep) and administered Artificial Tears 2 drops each eye instead of the ordered Pataday eye drops (itch relief eye drops) 1 drop each eye for Resident #28. These failures could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration resulting in decline in health and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/18/25 indicated Resident #28 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included bipolar disorder (associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), diabetes mellitus type 2 (chronic condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed provide sufficient support personnel to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively for 3 out of 12 dietary staff (Dietary staff D, Dietary staff B, and Dietary staff C). The facility did not ensure Dietary staff D, Dietary staff B, or Dietary staff C had current food handler permits. This failure could place residents who consumed food prepared from the kitchen at-risk of foodborne illness or nutritional deficiencies. Findings included: Review of the food handler's certificates of completion provided by the facility on 06/16/2025 at 1:00 p.m., indicated the following: Dietary staff D had a food handler certificate that expired on 01/08/2025. Dietary staff B had a food handler certificate that expired on 01/10/2025. Dietary staff C had a food handler certificate that expired on 01/10/2025. An attempted telephone interview on 06/18/2025 at 09:57 a.m. with Dietary staff B was unsuccessful. An attempted telephone interview on 06/18/2025 at 09:58 a.m. with Dietary staff C was unsuccessful.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 staff smoking area reviewed for environmental concerns. The designated staff smoking area was unkempt and had trash buried in the tall grass and weeds, This failure placed the staff and visitors at risk of uncomfortable environment. Findings included: During an observation on 06/16/25 at 1:00 p.m., the grass in courtyard between hall 200 and 300 was approximately 20 inches high and the weeds were over 4 feet tall. There were plastic wrappers trash and, paper towels, and cigarette butts were buried in the vegetation. During an interview on 06/16/25 at 2:00 p.m., Maintenance A said the maintenance department was responsible for ensuring the trash was picked up. He said this smoking area between hall 200 and 300 was for the staff and visitors smoking area. He said the areas should be maintained and be homelike for the residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complication of enteral feeding for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q mixed each crushed medications with water and administered one medication at a time when giving medications to Resident #2 through his G-tube (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach which allows the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medications directly into the stomach). The facility failed to ensure LVN Q administered Resident #2's G-tube medications by gravity, and instead she pushed the medications using the plunger of the syringe. These failures could place residents receiving enteral nutrition and medications at increased risk of not receiving proper nutrition, infection, and aspiration. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/18/25 indicated Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #64) and 1 of 3 medication rooms reviewed for storage of medications and biologicals. 1. The facility failed to ensure the lockbox for controlled medications was permanently affixed to the refrigerator in the Hall 300 medication room. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #64's medication was secured inside the locked medication cart in the women's unit on Hall 300. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed drugs or contaminated medication. Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview on 06/18/25 at 1:17 p.m. of the Hall 300 medication room the lockbox for controlled medications was locked but not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. LVN N said she had never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident #49) The facility failed to ensure CNA S performed proper hand hygiene while assisting to feed Resident #49. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/16/25 indicated Resident #49 was a [AGE] year-old-female readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily function). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #49 was severely impaired of cognition with a diagnosis of dementia and needed maximum assistance with eating. Record review of a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 2 of 2 resident rooms (Room #s 230 and 231) and 1 of 2 shower rooms (Unit 100 Hall D shower) reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility did not ensure the shower room on 100 D Hall was in good repair and in good working condition. 2. The facility failed to ensure two of two resident nightstands and rooms on Unit 2 were treated for cockroaches. These failures could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and infection due to unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 10/22/24 at 12:40 p.m., the shower room on Unit 100 Hall D had peeling and rusted door frames around the 2 of 2 shower stalls and toilet room, the sink had no drain (the drain pipe section was in a drawer on a stand adjacent to the hand sink), there were missing tiles and grout on the floor and in 2 of 2 shower stalls, there was unknown substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free from pests in 2 of 2 resident rooms. The facility failed to ensure two of two resident nightstands and rooms on Unit 2 were treated for cockroaches. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an observation on 10/24/24 at 1:50 p.m., there were cockroaches in the nightstand drawers of Resident #1 and Resident #2. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 1:50 p.m., Resident #1, who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], said he reported the cockroaches a few weeks ago to the lady at the front of the facility. He said the cockroaches had infested his room for weeks. He said the cockroaches crawled on his face and woke him up at night. He said he should not have to deal with roaches crawling on him in his bed. He said the facility should have addressed the issue after he reported to staff. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 3 dining rooms and 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. (Main dining room) The facility failed to ensure an air conditioner return air vent in the dining room was free of dust particles. The facility did not ensure kitchen equipment was sanitary and in good repair. This failure could place the residents at risk of food borne illnesses. Findings included: 1. During observations of the noon meal in the main dining room on 4/29/24 at 12:00 p.m., an AC return air vent, approximately 8 ft high by 4 foot wide, had dust approximately 1/4 thick on each slat of the vent. Air was blowing through the vent slats. Approximately 20 residents were sitting in the dining room eating lunch. During an interview on 4/29/24 at 12:02 p.m., the DM said the air conditioner return air vent had thick dust and needed to be cleaned. She said maintenance was supposed to clean it. She stated the dust is thick and nasty.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 2 of 28 residents reviewed for assessments. (Residents #13 and #109)). The facility failed to complete an accurate resident assessment for Resident #13. Resident #13's resident assessment did not reflect she was a tobacco user. The facility failed to complete an accurate resident assessment for Resident #109. Resident #109's resident assessment did not reflect her active diagnosis of anxiety disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 04/30/24 indicated Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that blocks airflow making it difficult to breathe) and respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own). Record review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 24 resident reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #7) The facility did not ensure Resident #7's splint was placed in her contracted right hand. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated April 2024 and May 2024 indicated Resident #7, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of right sided hemiplegia (paralysis) and cerebrovascular disease (stroke). The order did not indicate the resident had a splint. Record review of the most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #7 was a BIMs score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment) and did not have onset of acute mental status changes with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 2 errors out of 25 opportunities which resulted in an 8 percent error rate involving Residents' #58 and #92. LVN O administered Resident #58's midodrine HCL 5 mg (a medication used to treat low blood pressure) when the blood pressure was outside the prescribed parameters. LVN P administered Resident #92's clopidogrel 75 mg (a medication used to thin blood and prevent clotting) over 3 hours past the administration time frame listed on the medication administration record, according to the facility's policy that medications are scheduled according to the routine schedule of 7am. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefits of their medications as ordered. Findings included: ERROR #1 Physician orders dated April 2024 indicated Resident #58, admitted [DATE] was [AGE] years old with a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the gas stove and the convection ovens were in safe operating condition. This failure could place the residents at risk of a fire and not receiving their meals timely. Findings included: During observation and interview on 4/29/24 at 9:00 a.m., the double oven had a thick black substance on the interior walls, on the metal racks and on the base/floor of the oven. The DM said the oven was not used and had not worked since she started working at the facility about a year ago. The DM said the oven needed to be repaired. She said there was not an open work order for repair of the oven. During observation and interview on 4/30/24 at 10:45 a.m., the left and right sides of oven were not hot and there was no food in the oven. The DM said the oven did not work, the single gas convection oven did not work and the bottom half of the double…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training effective communications mandatory training was completed for 6 of 21 employees (LVN F, ST, PT, CNA K, CNA M, and the HS) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure effective communication training was completed by LVN F, ST, PT, CNA K, and CNA M during orientation. The facility did not ensure effective communication training was completed by the HS annually. These failures could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the employee files and trainings indicated: * LVN F, hire date 02/29/24, had not completed a communication training during orientation; * ST, hire date 04/18/24, had not completed a communication training during orientation; * PT, hire date 05/23/23, had not completed a communication training during orientation; * CNA K, hire date 04/23/24, had not completed a communication training during orientation; * CNA M, hire date 04/23/24, had not completed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of the resident and responsibilities of the facility were completed for 3 of 21 employees (OT, CNA M, and HS) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure the rights of the resident and responsibilities of the facility training was completed by OT and CNA M during orientation. The facility failed to ensure the rights of the resident and responsibilities of the facility training was completed by HS annually. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. Findings include: Record review of the employee files and trainings indicated: * OT, hire date 09/28/23, had not completed rights of the resident and responsibilities of the facility training during orientation; * CNA M, hire date 04/23/24, had not completed rights of the resident and responsibilities of the facility training during orientation; and * HS, hire date 05/16/18, last completed rights of the resident and responsibilities of the facility training on 03/23/23. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) for 2 of 15 (OT and HS) and dementia management for 2 of 15 employees (OT and LVN C) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure dementia management training was completed by the OT and LVN C during orientation. The facility did not ensure ANE training was completed by the OT during orientation. The facility did not ensure ANE training was completed by the HS annually. This failure could place residents with dementia at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation and a poor quality of care by staff with inadequate training when caring for dementia residents. Findings included: Record review of the employee files indicated: * LVN C, hire date 07/12/23, had not completed dementia management training during orientation; * OT, hire date 09/28/23, had not completed ANE and dementia management training during orientation ; and * HS, hire date 05/16/18, last completed ANE training on 03/23/23. During an interview on 05/01/24 at 11:16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program was completed for 15 of 21 employees (Administrator, BOM, DON, ST, PT, SW, AD, LVN C, LVN D, LVN F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L and CNA M) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure QAPI training was completed by the Administrator, BOM, DON, ST, PT, SW, AD, LVN C, LVN D, LVN F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L and CNA M. This failure could place staff and residents at risk for not being aware of facility programs, implementation, and monitoring. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated QAPI training was not done for the following staff: * Administrator, hire date 01/17/23, * BOM, hire date 03/18/24, * DON, hire date 08/02/22, * PT, hire date 05/25/23, * ST, hire date 04/18/24, * SW, hire date 02/29/24, * AD, hire date 12/21/20, * LVN C, hire date 07/12/23, * LVN D, hire date 10/26/23, * LVN F, hire date 02/29/24, * CNA G, hire date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program was completed for 4 of 21 staff (LVN C, OT, HS, and CNA M) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure infection prevention and control training was completed by the OT, CNA M, and LVN C during orientation. The facility did not ensure infection prevention and control training was completed by the HS annually. These failures could place residents at risk of illness due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated: * OT, hire date 09/28/23, had not completed infection prevention and control training during orientation; * LVN C, hire date 07/12/23, had not completed infection prevention and control training during orientation; * CNA M, hire date 04/23/24, had not completed infection prevention and control training during orientation; and * HS, hire date 05/16/18, last completed infection prevention and control training on 03/31/23. During an interview on 05/01/24 at 11:16 a.m., the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure compliance and ethics training was completed for 21 of 21 employees (Administrator, BOM, DON, ADON, ST, OT, PT, SW LVN D, LVN E, LVN F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, and CNA M) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure compliance and ethics training was completed for the BOM, ADON, LVN C, LVN D, LVN F, ST, OT, PT, SW, MD, CNA K, CNA L, and CNA M during orientation. The facility did not ensure compliance and ethics training was completed by the Administrator, DON, LVN E, AD, HS, CNA G, CNA H, and CNA J annually since the company had a total of 6 facilities. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated the following staff had not completed compliance and ethics training during orientation: * BOM, hire date 03/18/24, * ADON, hire date 10/02/23, * LVN C, hire date 07/12/23, * LVN D, hire date 10/26/23, * LVN F, hire date 02/29/24, * ST, hire date 04/18/24, * OT, hire date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure training on behavioral health was completed for 4 of 21 employees (Administrator, OT, LVN C, and CNA M) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure behavioral health training was completed by the OT, LVN C, and CNA M during orientation. The facility did not ensure behavioral health training was completed by the Administrator annually. This failure could place residents with behaviors at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated: * OT, hire date 09/28/23, had not completed behavioral health training during orientation,; * LVN C, hire date 07/12/23, had not completed behavioral health training during orientation,; * CNA M, hire date 12/07/23, had not completed behavioral health training during orientation,; and * Administrator, hire date 01/17/23, last completed behavioral health training on 01/24/23. Record review of a Training Programs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a missed dose of Oxacillin (used to treat bacterial infections) 1gm IV Q6H x 5 days was to start at 6:00 a.m. on 04/30/24 and unable to start the prescribed Oxacillin for Resident #92. The facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted when the pharmacy indicated the Oxacillin was outside of the recommended dose or frequency. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate medical treatments, which could result in severe illness or hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/30/24 indicated Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI), altered mental status, and heart disease. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to provide Resident #92 with a thoroughly clean room without other resident's personal belongings in his room. This failure could place residents at risk of unclean, unhomelike environment and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 04/30/24 indicated Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, altered mental status and heart disease. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #92 with a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognition impairment) and moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and showering. Record review of the care plan dated 04/30/2024 for Resident #92 has UTI / with Staphylococcus aureus was prescribed: Oxacillin Sodium. Interventions included to check at least every 2 hours for incontinence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to refer residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition to the State-designated authority for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #109) reviewed for PASRR. The facility did not refer Resident #109 to the LMHA when the NP provided a new mental illness diagnosis of anxiety. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASSAR services to meet their individual needs and could result in a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/30/24 indicated Resident #109 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included depression (mental illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Record review of a PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure preadmission screening for individuals identified with MI, DD, or ID were evaluated for services for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for resident assessments (Resident #415). The facility did not have an accurate PASRR level 1 screening (PL1) for Resident #415 upon admission. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/29/24 indicated Resident #415 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily functioning), and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities) on 04/11/24. Record review of a PASRR level 1 screening completed by the transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for physician orders. (Resident #92) The facility failed to follow physician orders related to ferrous gluconate (used to treat or prevent low blood levels of iron) for Resident #92. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving care and services as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 4/30/24 indicated Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, altered mental status and heart disease. Record review of the physician's orders for Resident #92 dated 04/30/24 indicated ferrous gluconate tablet 324 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day with start date of 04/18/2024. Record review of the MAR for Resident #92 indicated from 4/18/24 to 4/29/24 the ferrous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when used without adequate monitoring for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Residents #58 and #415) The facility failed to hold Resident #58's midodrine hcl (used to treat low blood pressure) when the resident's blood pressure was outside parameters set by the physician from 04/01/24 to 04/29/24. The facility failed to monitor Resident #415 for side effects from 04/12/24 to 04/29/24 of the anticoagulant medication Eliquis (a blood thinning medication). This failure could place residents at risk of complications and not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 04/30/24 indicated Resident #58 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), hypotension (low blood pressure), atherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #415) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor Resident #415 for side effects of the antipsychotic medication quetiapine fumarate and Abilify and the antianxiety medication buspirone hcl. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse consequences such as dizziness, drowsiness, oversedation, agitation, restlessness, and suicidal thoughts related to the use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/29/24 indicated Resident #415 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) and anxiety (a mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure CNAcans completed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) and dementia management trainings for 1 of 6 CNAs (CNA M) revicanewedreviewed for training. The facility did not ensure ANE and dementia management trainings were completed by CNA M during orientation. This failure could place residents with dementia at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation and a poor quality of care by staff with inadequate trainincang when caring for dementia residents. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated: * CNA M, hire date 12/07/23, had not completed ANE and dementia management trainings during orientation. Record review of a Training Programs policy dated October 2021 indicated Purpose: To ensure employees are provided the necessary training to perform their job at a high level while meeting state and federal regulations regarding annual training and in-servicing. Policy: Upon hire, and on an ongoing basis, employees will be provided the appropriate training to include state and federally mandated training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a 30-day notice to the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand before the resident was discharged for 1 of 1 (Resident #101) reviewed for Discharge Rights. The facility did not provide a written discharge notice to Resident #101 (who admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 08/30/23) or their representative prior to discharging the resident, not allowing the 30-day advance notice. The facility discharged Resident #101 to a behavioral hospital. This failure could place residents who are transferred or discharged from the facility, at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge and the right to appeal. Findings included: Record review of Resident #101's face sheet dated 01/09/24 indicated Resident #101 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents reviewed for a written plan of care received care and services as ordered by the physician for 3 of 23 residents. (Resident #22, #64 and #109) The facility failed to follow physician orders related to a blood pressure medication for Resident #22. The facility failed to follow physician orders related to blood pressure medication for Resident #64. The facility failed to initiate physician orders related to new order for anticoagulant for Resident #109. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving care and services as ordered by the physician. Findings included: 1.Physician orders dated February 2023 indicated Resident #22, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). An order was received 01/06/23 for clonidine HCl 0.1 mg. Instructions included give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for B/P (blood pressure) at 160/90 and above. The MAR dated February 2023 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for respiratory care and services. (Resident #100) The facility failed to administer the correct dose of oxygen to Resident #100. This failure could place the residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated March 2023 indicated Resident #100, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), dependence on supplemental oxygen and shortness of breath. The resident was to receive oxygen at 3 liters per nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 23 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident #22 and #64) Resident #22 missed several doses of a PRN blood pressure medication when her blood pressure was extremely elevated. Resident #64 received the antihypotension medication when it should have not been given and it was held when it should have been given on multiple occasions This failure could place resident at risk of not receiving medications as prescribed and/or significant medication errors. Findings included: 1. Physician orders dated February 2023 indicated Resident #22, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). An order was received 01/06/23 for clonidine HCl 0.1 mg. Instructions included give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for B/P (blood pressure) at 160/90 and above. The MAR dated February 2023 indicated on the following dates at 8:00 a.m., Resident #22's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$39,563 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-06-20
  • $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-06-20
  • $15,549 — penalty dated 2024-01-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.6-2.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX 1 of 5Brightpointe at Lytle LakeAbilene, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BELLVILLE HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2025
4195 MILAM STREET PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2025
4195 MILAM STREET OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2025
MCNEIL, AMBERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$120K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 4%Other / private 9%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $120K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$232per resident / day
operating cost
$7,044per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$198per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next