No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Adams

3011 W Adams Ave, Temple, TX 76504 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (254) 773-1626 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$19,240 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $19,240 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2010 W Avenue H · (254) 773-2453 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3550 S General Bruce Dr Temple
Grocery
2815 W Adams Ave · (254) 774-1950 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3620 Whispering Oaks · (254) 298-5690 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.5%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication15.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.352.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.912.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.7–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.26
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
66.2%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-19)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's(s') right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation for 2 of 6 residents (R#1 and R#2). The facility failed to ensure R#1 was not sexually assaulted by R#2 on 12/27/25. An IJ was identified on 12/31/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 9:04 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 01/02/26, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of further abuse, neglect, harm, injury, or death.Findings include:R#1Review of R#1's admission record, dated 12/31/25, reflected she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She had medical diagnoses that included transient cerebral ischemic attack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, , investigate any such allegations, and ensure reporting of crimes occurring in federally-funded long-term care facilities for 1 of 6 residents (R#1). The facility failed to implement written policies and procedures in response to the sexual assault of R#1 in that R#1 was not offered emergency transportation services after the abuse incident with R#2 occurred on 12/27/25. An IJ was identified on 01/02/26. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:24 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 01/03/26, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of continued abuse, neglect, harm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for general sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure that wastewater from the toilet in the kitchen bathroom did not leak into the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure that a bucket of waste material in the facility kitchen was disposed of properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the area around the ice machine was free of wastewater. An IJ was identified on 09/21/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 05:25 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/23/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespread and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because of the facility's need to continue staff training, disinfection, and monitoring for signs/symptoms of food borne illness. These failures placed residents at risk of food borne illness.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of one kitchen reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure that wastewater from the toilet in the kitchen bathroom did not leak into the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure that a bucket of waste material in the facility kitchen was disposed of properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the area around the ice machine was free of wastewater. An IJ was identified on 09/21/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 05:25 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/23/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespread and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because of the facility's need to continue staff training, disinfection, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free from pests for 1 of 1 kitchen rooms and 3 (Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 10 Resident rooms reviewed for environment.The facility failed to ensure the kitchen and dining room was free of cockroaches.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #5's room were free of cockroaches. These failures could place residents at risk for insect borne illness, not having a home free of pests and a comfortable environment in which to live.Findings included:Observation on 06/29/2026 at 11:01 AM revealed two Catchmaster Mouse and Insect Super Glue Traps in the kitchen on the floor located by a trashcan. Observed one Catchmaster box filled with dead cockroaches and a second box with two dead cockroaches. Observation on 06/28/2026 at 2:02 PM revealed a live cockroach in the right corner of Resident #2's room by the door stopper. During an interview on 06/29/2026 at 11:35 AM with Resident #3 she said she has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative(s) of the discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for discharge planning.The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP of Resident #1's discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing, in a language and manner they understand, and at least 30 days before Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 06/10/2026 in a facility-initiated discharge to another skilled nursing facility. The facility failed to send a copy of the notice to the facility's Ombudsman before Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 06/10/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without alternative placement, discharge options, their rights to appeal and access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it formulated, adopted, and enforced policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also consider non-smoking residents for 3 (Res#3, Res#4, and Res#5) of 3 residents reviewed. The facility failed to take residents who smoked out on a scheduled smoke break timely at 10:30 A.M. This failure could result in significant physical, emotional, and behavioral disruptions.Findings included: Record review on 06/05/26 of the smoking break schedule for the residents revealed they were scheduled to go to the designated area for a smoke break at 10:30 A.M. daily. It also revealed the following break times:8:30 AM, 10:30 AM, 1:30 PM, 3:30 PM, 6:30 PM, 8:30 PM. Record review on 06/05/26 of a list of smokers emailed by the RNC on 06/05/26 at 1:08 PM revealed 15 residents were included on the list. There was no printed list provided. A smoking policy was also requested but not provided prior to exit. During an observation on 06/05/26 at 10:50 A.M., the residents who smoked had not gone on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update two residents care plans (Res#1 and Res#2) of 7 residents reviewed to reflect interventions in place because of an incident that happened between them. The facility failed to update Res#1's and Res#2's care plans to reflect interventions in place because of an incident that happened on 05/03/26 at 6:26 PM. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.Finding included: Record review on 06/04/26 of Res#1's face sheet, dated 06/04/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included Vascular Dementia (a decline in thinking and memory skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to the brain, depriving brain tissue of vital oxygen and nutrients), Hyperlipidemia (high amounts of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol and triglycerides, circulating in your bloodstream), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (chronic metabolic disorder characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1(Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for resident's rights.The facility failed to provide peri care in a timely matter for Resident #1 thus causing her to be left sitting in a soiled brief for over four hours. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and diminished dignity, leaving the residents feeling helpless, sad and hopeless. Findings included:Record review of Residents #1 face sheet dated 01/14/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, furuncle of groin, dehydration, anxiety disorder unspecified, and hypocalcemia (a condition of low calcium in blood)Record review of Resident #1's most recent MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for 1 of 6 residents (R#1). The facility failed to report R#1's and R#2's incident to the SSA and law enforcement within 2 hours after the abuse was observed. This failure could place residents at risk of continued abuse, neglect, harm, injury, or death. Findings include: R#1 Review of R#1's admission record, dated 12/31/25, reflected she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She had medical diagnoses that included transient cerebral ischemic attack (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain, causing stroke-like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 28 residents observed for a clean environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 had a homelike environment . These deficient practices could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observations on 06/17/25 at 10:19 a.m., in Resident #1's room. Resident #1 was not in the room at the time. There were several pieces of trash on the floor. The bed sheets were dirty with several stains. It appeared the sheets had not been changed in several days. The bathroom had several pieces of trash on the floor. The toilet had fecal stains on the seat. The toilet appeared not to have been cleaned in a while. Observations on 06/17/25 at 10:19 a.m., in Resident #2's room. The armoire in the room looked old, with paint peeling off and holes in it. Resident #2 said it has been like that for a while. Resident #2 said he has not asked for anyone to replace it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed , to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for two of five residents ( Resident # 10 and Resident # 59 ) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Resident # 10 in room activities during the months of April, May, and June of 2025. The facility failed to provide Resident # 59 in room activities twice per week during the months of April, May, and June 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for boredom, depression, and diminished quality of life. Finding included: Review of Resident #10's Face Sheet, dated 06/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection for one (Resident #7) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to ensure that dressing changes were completed for Resident #7's pressure ulcer on 06/11/2025, 06/13/2025, and 06/16/2025. This failure could place residents with pressure ulcers at risk for infection, pain, and worsening of the wound. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's Face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old, female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Schizoaffective Disorder, bipolar type (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), Vascular Dementia with anxiety (dementia related to blood flow to the brain that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for 4 (ADON, RN, LVN M, and LVN J) of 5 staff reviewed for nephrostomy care for Resident #21. The staff were not aware that the nephrostomy policy for the facility indicated that Resident #21 should have sterile dressing changes per the facility policy. This failure could potentially affect the residents by placing them at risk for infection and deterioration of the stoma site due to staff who lack the appropriate skills and competencies to minimize infections. Findings: Review of Resident #21's Face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old, female admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Hydronephrosis (swelling of the kidneys from blockage of the flow of urine), Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes (chronic disorder of abnormal blood sugar levels). Review of Resident #21's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 medication carts (MA B's Medication Cart #1 and Medication Cart #2) and 4 of 6 residents (Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #10, and Resident #19) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA B accurately reconciled Resident #5's narcotic medication log for Medication Cart #1 when she administered Resident #5's tramadol (controlled medication used for pain) 1 tablet two doses and Codeine/Acetaminophen (controlled medication used for pain) 1 tablets two doses on 6/18/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA B accurately reconciled Resident #7's narcotic medication log for Medication Cart #1 when she administered Resident #7's oxycodone (controlled medication used for pain) 1.5 tablets and lorazepam (controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1.The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation when the [NAME] did not follow proper hand hygiene protocols. 2.The facility failed to ensure residents were safe from potentially contaminated food when staff did not sanitize their hands between giving residents food. The deficient practice could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 6/18/2025, at 9:30 AM, revealed that the Cook, after donning sanitized gloves, continued to prepare pureed noodles. While still wearing the same pair of gloves, she used three different kitchen utensils, a spatula, a serving spoon, and a whisk. She also touched the puree menu book, made notations using a pen, and opened the top of the puree machine to add liquid to the noodles, all without changing her gloves or sanitizing her hands. Furthermore, the [NAME] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident medical records for two of six residents reviewed for wound care documentation (Resident #7 and Resident #21) were complete and accurately documented. 1. The facility failed to ensure that documentation of dressing changes provided to Resident #7 was accurate and completed on 06/09/2025, 06/11/2025, 06/13/2025, and 06/16/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure that documentation of dressing changes provided to Resident #21 was accurate and completed on 06/18/2025 and 06/19/2025. This deficient practice could put the resident at risk of having inaccurate medical records and not receiving the ordered treatments and care. Findings: Review of Resident #7's Face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old, female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Schizoaffective Disorder, bipolar type (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pests. 1.The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of gnats, and 2 roaches throughout the facility including resident rooms and resident restrooms 2. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of bedbugs for Resident # 9. These deficient practices placed residents at risk of exposure to pests, diseases, infections, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 9's admission face sheet dated 6/18/25 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), abnormalities of gait and mobility, low back pain, depression (a group of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for one (unknown resident) of 28 residents . The facility failed to ensure the privacy of the unknown resident by not locking the laptop screen, so the resident's information could not be seen by someone walking by. This failure put residents at risk for confidential health information exposure, psychosocial harm and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 6/16/2025 at 12:05 PM during lunch service revealed that the tablet on the medication cart was open and the screen had the resident's information on the laptop screen. The surveyor was watching lunch service and walked around the corner, and the laptop was open. The surveyor waited five minutes, and the staff member did not return to the medication cart. The laptop screen timed out, and the screen went dark after five minutes. In an interview on 6/19/2025 at 1:53 p.m., MA A stated you cannot leave the laptop screen open with residents' information on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident # 10 and Resident #7) of 8 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 12/31/2024, completed Resident #10's preferences for customary routine and activities. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7's Significant Change in Status MDS assessment on 05/21/2025 accurately reflected that she had an unhealed pressure ulcer at the time of the assessment. This deficient practice could have placed the residents at risk for inadequate care and diminish quality of life due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #10's Face Sheet, dated 06/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation ( a group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident# 46, and Resident #59) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's and Resident # 59's nails were cleaned, and did not have any rough edges. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated, 06/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #46 had diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care ( helping individuals with activities of daily living like bathing, dressing, toileting, grooming, and eating), personal history of traumatic brain injury (occurs when external force impacts the head, causing damage to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for one (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed for nephrostomy care. The facility failed to ensure dressing changes were done for Resident #21's surgical sites on 06/18/2025 and 06/19/2025 and completed per the physician orders and with sterile technique per the facility policy. This failure puts residents at risk for infection and deterioration of the stoma site (a surgically created opening on the outside of your body that connects to an organ on the inside). Findings: Review of Resident #21's Face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old, female admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Hydronephrosis (swelling of the kidneys from blockage of the flow of urine), Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes (chronic disorder of abnormal blood sugar levels). Review of Resident #21's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 1 of 9 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #1's call light was answered in a timely manner. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/13/2025 documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: epilepsy (abnormal electricity activity in the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of lung disease that clock airflow and make it difficult to breathe), major depressive disorder(serious mental illness characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities and significant impairment in daily functioning), anxiety(intense, excessive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility, after being sent to the hospital for behaviors. This failure could place discharged residents and residents residing in the facility at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility causing a disruption in their care and/or services. Findings included: A record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/13/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Unspecified asthma (a chronic disease in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable for 3 of 8 resident (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, and #3 were provided care and services for hygiene. This failure could place residents at risk for poor self-esteem, infections, socialization, ADL decline and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/17/2025, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with Encephalopathy, unspecified (a brain disorder that affects brain function or structure, but the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality, for 9 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9) of 24 secure unit residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure LVN A treated Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 who were sitting in the dining area in the memory care unit with dignity and respect when she referred to the residents' clothing protectors as bibs to CNA B. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm due to diminished self-esteem and quality of life. Findings included: An observation of the memory care unit's dining area on 12/11/24 at 5:00 p.m. revealed there were 9 residents sitting in the dining area and about to be served their dinner meal trays. LVN A was at the nursing station in the memory care unit's dining area where the 9 residents were sitting. CNA B was standing in the hallway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 1 (MA C) of 3 staff reviewed for authorized drug destruction personnel. The facility failed to ensure a licensed professional was a witness to the drug destruction. MA C witnessed and handled controlled and non-controlled medications during the drug destruction process with the DON. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of the facility's staff roster, dated 12/11/24, reflected MA C was a medication aide. Record review of the facility's controlled and non-controlled drug destruction forms, from 06/01/24 through 12/11/24, reflected the following: -MA C signed as a witness and the DON signed as a nurse to the non-controlled and over the counter drug destruction process on 10/08/24. There was no signature from the Pharmacist. -MA C signed as a witness and the DON signed as a nurse to the non-controlled drug destruction process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff stored disposable plates and cups away from chemicals and cleaning supplies. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination, food contamination, and foodborne illness. Findings included: An observation of the kitchen's cleaning supply room on 12/11/24 at 10:35 a.m., revealed there was an open box of Styrofoam cups next to a rack that had cleaning supplies stocked on each shelf. The room door was propped wide open with 1 gallon-sized bottle of concentrated alkaline degreaser and 1 gallon-sized bottle of concentrated alkaline floor cleanser. There was no dietary staff in or near the cleaning supply room. From top to bottom, the first shelf had 1 quart spray bottle of heavy duty degreaser and 1 quart spray bottle of bio-enzymatic odor eliminator hanging on the edge of the shelf. The second shelf had 1 open and half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safely for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food storage and labeling in that: 1.The facility failed to ensure food and beverages were safely stored, labeled, and dated. in refrigerator #1, refrigerator #2, and freezer #1, freezer #2 and in the dry storage area on 05/14/24. 2.The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff DC #2 and DC #3 were properly wearing hair nets and properly wearing and changing gloves on 05/14/2024 and 05/15/2024. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. The findings included: Observation of Refrigerator #1: At 8:35am on 5/14/2024 revealed a one gallon of milk labeled with an expiration date of 5/21/2024 did not contain an opened-on date. At 8:35am on 5/14/2024 revealed a one-gallon plastic container of dill pickles that did not contain an opened-on and use-by date. At 8:35am on 5/14/2024 revealed a white plastic container with plastic wrap placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for them in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 3 (Residents #5, #28, and #29 ) of 16 residents reviewed for resident rights. 1.The facility failed to treat Resident #28 with respect and dignity on 5/14/2024 during the Hoyer transfer to keep her body covered. 2.The facility failed to treat Resident # 5 with respect and dignity on 5/14/2024 during wound care, by not closing the door to the room or pulling the privacy curtain. 3.The facility failed to treat Resident's # 5 on 5/14/2024 and # 29 on 5/17/2024 by always keeping a privacy bag on the foley drainage bag. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety. Findings included: Review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 5/16/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 5 (Rooms 28, 32, 34, 36, and 64) of 20 resident rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the ceiling tiles in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were free from stains and drooping on 05/14/24, 05/15/24, and 05/16/24. The facility failed to ensure the blinds in rooms 28, 32, 36, and 64 were free from missing slats on 05/14/24, 05/15/24, and 05/16/24. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment, lack of privacy, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 05/14/24 at 9:02 AM revealed slats missing from the blinds. During an observation and interview on 05/14/24 at 11:57 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed three ceiling tiles with stains and one of the tiles was drooping. LVN A stated when she saw a problem, she reported it to the maintenance man but if it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment of 4 (Residents # 5, Resident # 10, Resident # 24 and Resident # 58) of 24 reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5's care plan dated 5/3/2024 was resident by behaviors, mood and medication documented brief and generic. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident # 10's care plan dated 4/11/2024 reflected his pain and interventions to ensure resident had the best possible quality of life. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident # 24's care plan dated 4/11/2024 was individualized to meet resident needs and preferences. 4.The facility failed to ensure Resident # 58's care plan dated was individualized to resident needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #58's order, dated 05/03/24, for the psychotropic medication lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) PRN was not ordered beyond 14 days without an end date. The facility failed to ensure Resident #58 was monitored for side effects and behaviors related to the use of Abilify (an antipsychotic medication) from 04/23/24 through 05/17/24, and lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) from 05/03/24 through 05/17/24. These failures could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medication, unwanted side effects, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #58's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 04/12/24. Section I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater (10.34%) for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #50, and Resident #54) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. 1) The facility failed to ensure LVN A primed the insulin pen prior to administering insulin to Resident #1 on 05/14/24. 2) The facility failed to ensure MA E administered Senna 8.6mg as ordered instead she gave Senna-S 8.6mg/50mg to Resident #50 on 05/15/24. 3) The facility failed to ensure LVN B primed the insulin pen prior to administering insulin to Resident #54 on 05/15/24. These failures placed residents at risk of incorrect doses and not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications prescribed by the physician. Findings included: 1) Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 07/12/06. Section I (Active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments, under proper temperature control and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (medication room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 2 medication storage rooms and 2 (medication cart #1 and medication cart #2) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Medication cart # 1 was left unattended and unlocked on 05/15/2024. Medication Cart #2 was left unattended and unlocked on the secure unit on 05/14/2024. An expired, opened and accessed, medication was stored in the medication room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator on 05/15/2024. This failure could allow residents unsupervised access to prescription and over the counter medication and can result in the resident receiving ineffective medication due to expired medications. Findings included: Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:11 am revealed Medication cart # 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to prepare food and drink that are palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for two of three meals sampled in that: The facility failed to provide food that was palatable (vegetables with no flavor or seasoning) at a safe and appetizing temperature (sample tray was luke warm.] . This failure could place residents at risk of not being satisfied with their food, decreased food intake, unintended weight loss, hunger, poor nutrition, impeded recovery from illness and injury and diminished quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 5/15/2024 at 12:05pm in the kitchen revealed a tray of pre-seasoned garlic bread cooked in the oven. Sitting beside a toast oven, was another metal tray which contained stacks of toasted, white bread, which was over-cooked and was deep brown/black in color. An interview on 5/15/2024 at 12:10pm DC #2, said they did not have enough of the frozen, pre-seasoned garlic bread and had substituted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for two of three meals sampled. The facility failed to ensure the puree texture was in a form (pudding like consistency that was smooth) to meet resident needs for two of three lunch meals on (5/14/2024 and 5/15/2024) sampled by two (Surveyor # 2 and Surveyor #3) of four survey team members . These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, choking and aspiration. . The finding included: On 5/14/2024 @ 1:10pm an observation of pureed sample meal by two (Surveyor #2 and Surveyor #3) of four survey team members . The pureed meal consisted of Cajun sausage and beans, white rice, breaded okra, a baked roll, and bread pudding. Both team members agreed the sausage and beans had a good flavor but contained small pieces of sausage that required chewing prior to swallowing. The rice had a suitable texture and lacked flavor or seasoning. The okra, bread, and dessert had appropriate puree texture. On 5/14/2024 @ 1:30pm an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections in 14 ( Residents # 5,#9,#10, #23,#26,#28,#29,#31,#33, #41, # 58, # 61, and # 66) of 23 residents that were reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practice in that: 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA I, MA J, MA K, CNA L and ST did not grab Resident's 9 (Resident #9, # 23. #26, # 29 #31, # 33, #41, #61, and #69) of 23, cup by the rim with bare hands, contaminating the tops of the rims, during the meal service on the secure unit on 5/12/2024 and 5/13/2024 at lunch time. 2.The facility failed staff failed to follow hand hygiene 3(resident # 5, 10, and 28) of 23 A. on 5/14/2024 at 11:00 am ADON did not use Proper hand hygiene and wound care techniques while performing wound care on Resident # 5. B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, pain management services for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident #10) The facility failed to ensure Resident # 10 received his scheduled Oxycodone 5mg every 4 hours for 5/11/2024 at noon to 5/13/2024 at 12:00am for a total of 13 doses. The facility failed to obtain an alternative medication for Resident #10's pain, until 5/12/2024 with the initial dose being given at 7:32 pm leaving Resident #10 in pain for over 24 hours. This failure placed residents at risk of increased pain and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident # 10 face sheet dated 5/16/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and [NAME] if difficult to breathe), Pain unspecified (Acute pain due to trauma)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services to 1 of 2 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to provide routine dental services for Resident #1, since admission on [DATE], who was being treated for an oral infection. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in oral health, oral infections, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 07/12/06. Section I (Active Diagnoses) reflected diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), anemia (lack of red blood cells in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia, anxiety (intense and excessive worry and fear), and schizophrenia (a disorder that is marked by a combination of symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care for residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's bed was moved, per request, as outlined in his care plan, to allow him for more space. This failure could place the residents at risk for depression and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #1 quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/26/2023, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] and had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated cognitive intactness . Review of Resident #1's care plan, last reviewed and revised 10/19/2023, reflected the following: Problem Start Date: 06/01/2022 Resident requests that his bed be against the wall to allow for more space in room. Edited: 10/19/2023 Goal Target Date: 01/20/2024 Requests will be honored. Edited: 10/19/2023 Approach Start Date: 06/01/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure five (5) of five (5) residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #5 and Resident #6) reviewed for notification of room change, received written notice prior to a room change. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #5 and Resident #6 received written notice prior to a room change. This facility failure placed all residents at risk for being displaced without notice and/or reason in order to accommodate other individuals. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old women admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia (progressive loss of intellectual functioning), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Insomnia (sleeping disorder), Anxiety disorder, Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) and senile degeneration of brain (a decrease in the ability to think, concentrate or remember). Revie of Resident #1's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The Dietary Manger failed to ensure all items were stored properly, labeled, dated, and discarded prior to their expiration date. The Dietary Manger failed to ensure the handwashing sink was stocked with paper towels. CK J failed to properly wash her hands between tasks. These failures placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: An observation on 3/21/2023 at 10:00 a.m. revealed the kitchen's handwashing sink was not stocked with paper towels. Observations of the reach-in refrigerator on 3/21/2023 from 10:02 a.m. - 10:14 a.m. revealed the following: At 10:02 a.m., the reach-in refrigerator contained a plastic sealable bag of unidentifiable meat patties dated 3/20/2023. At 10:03 a.m., the reach-in refrigerator contained a plastic storage container of mixed fruits without a label or date. At 10:04 a.m., the reach-in refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for ten (Resident #3, Resident #11, Resident #13, Resident #15, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #44, Resident #49, Resident #55, and Resident #58) of 24 residents reviewed for a clean, comfortable, and organized environment. Window blind slats were missing from the blinds for residents #3, #11, #13, #15, #20, #23, #49, #55, and number 58. The Smoking area for residents #13, #44, and #55 was not cleaned and organized Ceiling tiles were missing from the outside hallway to the main central nurse's station. The failure could result in a diminished quality of life and prevent these residents from attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings included: A record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 3/23/2023 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia (memory loss), lumbago with sciatica (lower back pain), acute kidney failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for three (Resident #15, Resident #17, and Resident #41) of eight residents reviewed for portion size adequacy. CK J served Resident #15, Resident #17, and Resident #41 pureed food items using scoops smaller than required per the facility's menu. This failure placed residents at risk of poor intake, weight loss, and malnutrition. Findings included: A record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 3/23/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of right femur (broken thigh), unspecified dementia (memory loss), Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (low body weight), abnormal weight loss, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (acid reflux), muscle wasting (muscle loss), chronic kidney disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), major depressive disorder (depression), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), cachexia (unintentional weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received food and drinks that accommodated their preferences for four (Resident #11, Resident #14, Resident #17, and Resident #41) of eight residents reviewed for food and drink preferences. 1. TNA H failed to provide coffee requested by Resident #11. 2. Dietary staff failed to provide Resident #14 with ice cream per his tray ticket and physician's order. 3. LVN B failed to offer Resident #41 an additional helping of food when he finished his plate and was still hungry. 4. Nursing staff failed to offer Resident #17 an additional helping of food when she finished her plate and appeared still hungry. These failures placed residents at risk of hunger and not receiving their food and drink preferences. Findings included: A record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 3/24/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia (memory loss), hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for two of two residents (Residents #17 and Resident #15) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 and Resident #17 were fed by a staff member sitting at eye level rather than standing over them. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: A record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 3/23/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of right femur (your thigh bone), unspecified dementia (memory loss), Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (low body weight), abnormal weight loss, gastro-esophageal reflux disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #62) and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #169) reviewed for incontinent care as indicated by: MA E failed to properly sanitize blood pressure cuff when moving from one resident to another resident when administering medications and obtaining blood pressure for Resident #62. CNA G failed to wash or sanitize her hands while going from a dirty to clean surface when performing incontinent care on Resident #169. This deficient practice placed all residents identified at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #62's face sheet dated 03/23/23 reflected Resident #62 was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/27/22. Resident #62's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease (long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data including the facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked was posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors for 2 (05/14/24 and 05/15/24) of 3 days reviewed for nurse staffing information. The facility failed to post the required staffing information on 05/14/24 and 05/15/24. The facility failed to post the required staffing information in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors on 05/14/24. These failures could place residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. Findings included: An observation on 05/14/24 from 9:42 AM to 9:45 AM revealed no posted staffing information readily accessible. During an observation and interview on 05/14/24 at 9:47 AM, the DON stated the posting was on the bulletin board at the nurse's station. The data sheet was in a plastic sleeve, posted on a bulletin board between several other hanging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$19,240 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $10,361 — penalty dated 2026-01-03
  • $8,879 — penalty dated 2023-09-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX 1 of 5Brightpointe at Lytle LakeAbilene, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
3011 W ADAMS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
ANA TX HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
GRAF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
TX SNF HOLDINGS III LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
TX SNF HOLDINGS MEMBER, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
3011 W ADAMS PROPERTY OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
HOLLIDAY, MELVINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
HOUSE, JANELLEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$640K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 5%Other / private 24%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $640K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$232per resident / day
operating cost
$7,061per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$200per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675587. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next