Avir at Seguin
1215 Ashby, Seguin, TX 78155 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (830) 379-1606 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,877 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 0.8% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.4% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.5% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.4% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.14 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.6%CMS range 22.9–48.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.0–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.0–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.46 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 67.7 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers based on the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility failed to obtain a physician order for treatment and wound care for Resident #1's right heel resulting in the wound declining from a blister to a stage 4 pressure injury that was later found to have maggots. An IJ was identified on 7/5/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 7/5/2024 at 8:26 pm. While the IJ was removed on 7/6/2024 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity level of no actual harm because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet (printed 7/5/2024) revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free from pests for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pest control, in that: The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep flies out of resident rooms resulting in an infestation of maggots in Resident #1's right heel wound. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/16/2024 and ended on 06/18/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. The failure could place residents with wounds at risk for infection or infestations from pests. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet (printed 6/20/2024) revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: pressure ulcer of right heal (stage 4 pressure injury a full-thickness wound with skin loss with extensive destruction, tissue necrosis, and damage to the underlying muscle, tendon,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect right of residents to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse.Resident #1 was hit on the head by NA B.The noncompliance was identified as a PNC. The facility corrected the noncompliance on 8/6/2025 before the surveyor's entry to the facility.This failure could place residents at risk for abuse with injury, intimidation and a decreased quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/29/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: major depressive disorder, dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure) and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's CP dated 08/11/2025 revealed he was care planned for impaired cognitive function due to dementia, fall risk, and aggressive behaviors of throwing objects, and trying to hit staff.Record review of Resident#1's QMDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 3, indicative of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a care plan in his electronic medical record. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met and not receiving appropriate care.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/23/2026, reflected resident was an [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life and activities) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling or sadness and loss of interest). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/13/2026, reflected that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for care plans: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4's comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented to include care areas identified in the admission MDS assessments. This deficient practice could cause confusion for staff members responsible for providing direct care to the residents and place residents at risk of receiving improper care and services. The findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 2/06/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: chronic combined systolic and diastolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for pharmacy services.Resident #53's ordered daily Lyrica (pain medication) was not available for the resident from admission on [DATE] to 7/28/25. The resident missed 7 doses.This failure could result in increased pain, and a decreased quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet dated 7/31/25 indicated the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. The resident's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where brain function is disrupted due to chemical imbalances in the body, often resulting from illnesses or organ dysfunction), abscess of vulva (a collection of pus that forms in the skin or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive and determine the choice to receive or not receive CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for 1 (Resident #28) of 8 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's OOH DNR was legible and able to use in emergency situations. This failure could affect any residents who have medical records and could result in misinformation about professional care provided.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #28's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of rectum (rectal cancer), glaucoma (damage to the optic nerve of the eye), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine can't flow through your ureter, bladder, or urethra due to some obstruction). Record review of Resident #28's admission MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #5 and Resident #28) reviewed for care plans: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's comprehensive care plan was completed in a timely manner and included his PICC line (is a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's comprehensive care plan was completed in a timely manner and included his code status. This deficient practice could cause confusion for staff members responsible for providing direct care to the residents and place residents at risk of receiving improper care and services.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The cooler had a package of sliced lunch meat with a lot of juice in the package that was sliced opened and not closed. The freezer had a bag of frozen sugar cookie dough that was left open. These failures could place residents that received meals and or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation and interview on 7/28/2025 at 10:21AM revealed a bag of sliced lunchmeat in the cooler that was in its original package with a substantial amount of liquid from the meat, was sliced open and was placed in a food grade plastic bag with a knot that was torn open. The bag nor the package was sealed which left the sliced lunchmeat opened. A bag of sugar cookie dough was in the freezer open and not sealed.The DM said, Oh, I'll fix that right away.Observation on 7/28/2025 at 3:30PM revealed the bag of cookie dough remained in the freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's hospice documents including: The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient, hospice election form, physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient, names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient, and instructions on how to access the hospice's 24-hour on-call system. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for residents who eat in their rooms in one (Hall 500) of six halls observed for in-room dining services. While passing lunch trays in hallway 500, CNA-A did not sanitize or clean her hands in between residents. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Observation of meal services on Hall 500 on 03/12/2025 at 12:17 p.m. revealed CNA-A was in process of distributing lunch trays to residents in their rooms on Hall 500. CNA-A was observed to check a tray card on the lunch tray, and then carry the tray to a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA-A then returned to the rack of lunch trays, checked tray card on another lunch tray and carried that lunch tray to room [ROOM NUMBER]A, where she assisted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice to including but not limited to the residents choice to activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), healthcare and providers of healthcare services consistent with his or her interest, assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to honor Resident #1's request to be assisted out of bed at least once a day. This failure could place residents at risk for depression, diminished quality of life and isolation. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/14/2025 revealed an admission date of 07/23/2021 with latest re-admission on [DATE], and with diagnoses which included: Cerebral infarction (stroke); Hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis on one side of body)affecting right dominant side; Aphasia (language…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service. 1. The facility failed to ensure all open items in the freezers were labeled and dated. a. 4 bags of open frozen foods not labeled with contents or date opened/used by 2. The facility failed to ensure all foods in the refrigerator were labeled and dated. a. Two trays of portioned foods covered and not labeled in the reach in refrigerator (1 of 2) 3. The facility failed to ensure all equipment was clean and sanitary. a. Spilled and partially dried liquid in the bottom of the reach in refrigerator (1 of 2) b. The table-mounted can opener had sticky black and brown grime on the blade and along the base of the equipment. These failures affect all the residents who received meals from the kitchen and place them at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation of the facility's only kitchen on 06/02/2024 at 9:39 AM revealed 4 bags of opened foods in reach in freezer (1 of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed residents has a right to a clean and comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving support for daily living including clean bed for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #56) for 3 of 4 survey days (6/2/24 to 6/5/24) whose environment was observed for clean linens. Nursing staff failed to ensure they changed Resident #56's bed sheets for 3 of 4 survey days (6/2/24 to 6/5/24. Resident #56's bed sheets were stained with brown spots and had residue all over them. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of low self-esteem. The findings were: Review of Resident #56's quarterly MD'S assessment, dated 4/12/24, revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure), ESRD (also called end-stage kidney disease or kidney failure, occurs when chronic kidney disease, the gradual loss of kidney function, reaches an advanced state. In end-stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Base d on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #61) whose records were reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to recognize on the Level 1 PASRR screening that Resident #61 had a mental illness diagnosis of Bi-polar Disorder which would qualify her for a PASRR evaluation. This deficient practice could affect residents with a mental illness and could result in Resident's not receiving mental health services as needed. The findings were: Review of Resident #61's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/31/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Manic Depression (Bi-polar disorder) and Seizure Disorder. Further review revealed Resident #61's BIMS was 6 out of 15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #61's Care Plan dated 3/31/24 read: Resident has bipolar disorder, current episode depressed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 3 residents (Resident #4, Resident #43 and Resident #52) reviewed for oxygen therapy in that: 1. Residents #4 and #52's, nebulizer tubing was on the bedside table unbagged and undated. 2. Resident #43's filter on the oxygen concentrator had lint build up on it. These failures could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for an increase in respiratory complications and or infections. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 6/2/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included Peripheral vascular disease (is a chronic condition that affects blood vessels outside of the heart and brain), Dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for one of four quarters for 2024 (Quarter 3) reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. According to the PBJ report for Quarter 3 2024 (March 1 through May 31), the facility did not have sufficient staff on weekends. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life and quality of care. Findings: Record review of the CMS PBJ reports Quarter 3 2024 ( March 1 through May 31) indicated: the facility had a 1-star staffing rating. Record review of CMS PBJ report for Quarter 3 202 (March 1 through May 31) indicated the facility had excessively low weekend staffing. Record review of RN staffing hours for February 2024 - May 2024 revealed that there was no RN coverage on 3/16/24, 3/17/24,3/24/24,3/24/24,3/30/24/3/31/24,4/6/24, 4/7/24, 4/20/24,4/27/24,5/11/24,5/12/24,5/25/24 and 5/26/24. Interview on June 4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for residents who eat in their rooms in halls 100 and 200. While passing lunch trays in hallways 100 and 200 staff did not sanitize or clean hands in between residents. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Observation of meal services on 06/02/2024 at 12:16 PM revealed the Business Office Manager (BOM) passing trays in the 100 and 200 halls. The BOM went from the rack of trays into resident's rooms with lunch trays then back to the rack of lunch trays in the hallway. The BOM pushed the rack of lunch trays down the hall and repeated the process for all residents eating in their rooms in halls 100 and 200. The BOM did not wash or sanitize her hands after pushing the rack of trays down the hallways or between passing each resident's trays. Interview on 06/02/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #16) who were observed for call light placement. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #16's call light was within reach for use if she needed to ask for assistance. This deficient practice could affect any resident who used a call light and could contribute to resident's needs not being met. The findings were: Review of Resident #16's significant change MDS assessment, dated 3/20/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior) and Dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). Further review revealed Resident #16's BIMS was 8 out of 15 indicative of moderate cognitive impairment, her vision was moderately impaired, she was dependent on staff from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including but not limited to choose health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #61) whose records were reviewed for health care services. Resident #61 expressed her desire to find a psychiatrist within the community. The SS worker told Resident #61 she could select a psychiatrist of her choice but because the facility provided in house psychiatry services, she would have to secure her own transportation. This deficient practice could affect any resident exercising their rights to choose their own health care providers and result in a direct violation of the resident's right to autonomy. The findings were: Review of Resident #61's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/31/24, revealed she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for one of five residents (Resident # 15) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure CMA E locked the computer, which exposed Resident #15's morning medication list after she walked away and left the computer unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected. The findings include: Record review of Resident # 15's face sheet, dated 6/4/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included Acute Kidney Failure ( occurs when your kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood) , aphagia (The loss of the ability to swallow) and Right hemiplegia ( is a condition that causes paralysis on the right side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 (Resident #71) residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #71's care plan documented interventions for the diagnosis of General anxiety disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving proper care and services related to the disease process. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 71's face sheet, dated 6/4/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis that Included General anxiety disorder (involving a persistent feeling of anxiety or dread that interferes with how you live your life),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #56) whose records were reviewed for ADL care. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #56 received a shower on 6/3/24 and on 6/5/24. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of low self-esteem. The findings were: Review of Resident #56's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/12/24, revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure), ESRD (also called end-stage kidney disease or kidney failure, occurs when chronic kidney disease, the gradual loss of kidney function, reaches an advanced state. In end-stage renal disease, your kidneys no longer work as they should to meet your body's needs) and PVD (a condition that affects the blood vessels outside of the heart and brain).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #12) reviewed for falls. Nursing staff failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #12 which resulted in her experiencing a fall on 6/3/24. On 6/5/24 nursing staff failed to ensure the fall mats were next to her bed to cushion her fall in an effort to prevent injuries related to having a history of frequent falls. These deficient practices could affect residents at risk for falls and could result in avoidable falls and injuries. The findings were: Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure), Alzheimer's Disease (causes the brain to shrink and brain cells to eventually die. Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia, a gradual decline in memory) and Hemiplegia (is a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity made by the pharmacist had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it. If there was to be no change in the medication, the attending physician should document his or her rationale in the resident's medical record for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #25) whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON and ADON failed to identify the pharmacist addressed identified medication irregularities to the wrong physician when completing the pharmacy review for Resident #25. This resulted in a delay in the physician's response to the medication irregularity including Zyrtec (used for allergies) and Hydrocodone (used for pain). This deficient practice could affect any resident, delay a physician's response and result in a decline in the residents health. The findings were: Review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one medication cart out of two carts reviewed for medication storage , in that : 1. LVN B left the medication cart unsecured on 100 Hallway while administering medications. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for misappropriation, misuse or tampering of medications. The findings included: Observation on 06/04/2024 at 08:28 a.m. on the 100 Hall revealed that the medication cart was left unattended and not locked. During an interview on June 4, 2024, at 08:28 with LVN B, it was revealed that she had left the medication cart unlocked, which was a practice she claimed to have never done before. Her focus on checking a resident led to this oversight. She acknowledged the potential for misappropriation, misuse, and harm if someone were to gain unauthorized access to the cart and acquire medications, including insulin. In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 2 (refrigerators in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 5 residents' refrigerators reviewed in that: The personal refrigerators in two residents' rooms contained food items that were unlabeled and undated. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which are spoiled. The findings were: Observation on 06/01/2024 at 10:02 a.m. revealed the personal refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] contained a burrito with expiration date of 2/12/24, which was unlabeled and undated. Observation on 06/01/2024 at 10:48 a.m. revealed the personal refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] contained bologna that was unlabeled and undated. Further observation on 06/01/2024 at 11:54 a.m. revealed the bologna was still present. On June 1, 2024, at 10:37 a.m. during an interview with CNA A, it was confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for two (Hall 400 and 500) of six halls and one resident shower rooms on Hall 400 observed for environment. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms on Halls 400 and 500 and the resident shower room on Hall 400 were clean, safe, and in good repair. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: An unidentified complainant had notified the surveyor that several months prior to this investigation, one of the rooms on 500 Hall had been closed off due to the collapse of the ceiling and a smell of mold. Upon investigation on 05/14/24 at 12:00 pm, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a large hole in the ceiling approximately 3 feet square with an adjacent piece of ceiling about the same size with the drywall to the ceiling removed and covered only by insulation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-22 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 of 3 staff (Staff A) reviewed for staff qualifications. The facility failed to ensure Staff A completed the appropriate educational requirements of a bachelor's degree in social work and was appropriately licensed to practice social work in the State of Texas. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services from staff who were properly trained and supervised. The findings included: Record review of staff Roster (undated) revealed Staff A had a job title listed as Social Services with a hire date of 07/01/2022. Record Review of a job description titled Social Service Director dated 7/02/2022 signed by Staff A revealed: Job Requirements: Education Experience: bachelor's degree in social work. During an interview on 3/21/2024 at 4:00 p.m., Staff A stated she was hired as the facility Social Worker approximately 1.5 years ago. She stated she had completed a bachelor's degree…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was present in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day and seven days per week, and designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for registered nursing coverage and presence of a director of nursing, in that: A registered nurse was not present in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day and seven days per week, and the facility did not have a director of nursing in its employ for approximately five months prior to the survey period. This failure could affect all residents receiving care from facility staff who did not have the advanced training of a registered nurse. The findings were: Record review of the facility staff posting, dated 05/02/2023, revealed a registered nurse was not scheduled at anytime during the twenty-four hour period. During an interview with the Regional RN on 05/05/2023 at 1:42 p.m., the Regional RN stated that the facility had not employed a registered nurse serving as director of nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-05 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective Communications Mandatory Training for 16 of 16 employees (Laundry M, CNA N, CNA O, Transporter P, MA B, CNA Q, Dietary R, DM, AD, LVN S, LVN, A, MDS, RN T, LVN C, LVN F, and SS) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure Laundry M, CNA N, CNA O, Transporter P, MA B, CNA Q, Dietary R, DM, AD, LVN S, LVN, A, MDS, RN T, LVN C, LVN F, and SS completed effective communication training. These failures could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. The findings were: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed CNA M was hired on 09/12/1998. Record review of Laundry M's training history revealed Laundry M had not completed communication training in the last year. b. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed CNA N was hired on 06/24/2002. Record review of CNA N's training history revealed CNA N had not completed communication training in the last year. c. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-05 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 16 of 16 employees (Laundry M, CNA N, CNA O, Transporter P, MA B, CNA Q, Dietary R, DM, AD, LVN S, LVN, A, MDS, RN T, LVN C, LVN F, and SS) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure Laundry M, CNA N, CNA O, Transporter P, MA B, CNA Q, Dietary R, DM, AD, LVN S, LVN, A, MDS, RN T, LVN C, LVN F, and SS completed QAPI training within the last year. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed CNA M was hired on 09/12/1998. Record review of Laundry M's training history revealed Laundry M had not completed QAPI training in the last year. b. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed CNA N was hired on 06/24/2002. Record review of CNA N's training history revealed CNA N had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to purchase a surety bond to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility for 1 of 1 resident trust account reviewed, in that: The amount on deposit in the resident trust fund was less than the amount of the surety bond. This failure could affect all residents with funds on deposit in the resident trust fund and cause a lack of security of resident personal funds. The findings were: Record review of the facility's surety bond, dated 08/24/2022, revealed the bond amount was $40,000.00. Record review of the resident trust fund as of 05/05/2023, revealed the balance was $51,125.39. During an interview with the BOM on 05/05/2023 at 3:05 p.m., the BOM confirmed the amount of the surety bond was greater than the amount on deposit in the resident trust fund. During an interview with ADON C on 5/05/2023 at 6:27 p.m., ADON C stated the residents' funds on deposit in the resident trust fund should be secured. During an interview with the Regional RN on 05/05/2023 at 4:07 p.m., the Regional RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 5 of 39 residents (Resident #4, Resident #20, Resident #66, Resident #28 and Resident #33) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: 1. Resident #4's OOH-DNR was executed by two physicians and the resident had family members. 2. Resident #20's OOH-DNR was not witnessed and had no accompanying physician order. 3. Resident #66's OOH-DNR was not signed twice by her qualified relative. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's and Resident #33's OOH-DNR's were signed at the bottom, by either the nearest living relative or the resident. These failures could place residents at-risk for residents' rights not being honored and having CPS performed against the residents' will. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: encephalopathy, unspecified dementia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 5 of 21 staff (MA I, [NAME] J, Hskg K, AD and MDS Coordinator ) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: 1. The facility failed to follow their abuse policy when a criminal background check and the EMR was not completed in a timely manner prior to their hired dates for MA I, [NAME] J, and Hskg K. 2. The facility failed to follow their abuse policy when the AD's and the MDS's annual EMR was not completed within the past year. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. The findings were: Record review of facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, revised 08/2006, which read Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Our facility is committed to protecting out residents from abuse by anyone including but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5% for 5 of 10 Residents (Residents #25, #48, #19, #50, and #35) reviewed for medication administration errors, in that: The Facility staff administered 45 medications of which 25 were administered to Residents #25, #48, #19, and #50, outside of acceptable parameters for safe medication administration; and one medication at the wrong dosage for Resident #35, which resulted in a 57% medication error rate. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: Residents #25 Record review of the Face Sheet dated 5/05/2023 revealed Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was admitted with non-traumatic brain dysfunction related to unspecified psychosis [not related to substance or physiological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were accurately documented for 1 of 39 Residents (Resident #174) reviewed for medical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #174's Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type diagnoses was listed throughout the residents EHR. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. The findings were: Record review of Resident #174's face sheet, dated 05/04/2023, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, anxiety, mood disturbance, unspecified psychosis. Further record review did not reveal a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type Record review of Resident #174's clinical notes, entered on 04/19/2023 at 12:44 pm by RN E, which read Patient admitted to [Facility Name] at 0800 from [State Hospital Name]. Transported by State Hospital facility van with medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement contained all the required elements for all current residents. The facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement contained the required element: The right to rescind within 30 calendar days of signing. This failure could place the residents and their representatives at risk of being uninformed about their rights regarding binding arbitration and less able to defend their rights related to disputes, controversy or claims arising out of or related to the services provided by the nursing facility. Findings included: During the entrance conference on 5/02/2023 at 8:45 AM with the ADM, a blank copy of the facility's admission packet and of the facility's binding Arbitration Agreement were requested and these were received by the survey team on 5/02/2023 by 5:00 PM. Record review of the facility's admission agreement, dated June 2020, revealed an Arbitration Agreement dated Jan[uary] 2014. The Arbitration Agreement did not state that the resident had the right to rescind the binding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 5 (Resident #4, Resident #20, Resident #66, Resident #28 and Resident #33) of 39 residents reviewed, in that: The Advanced Directives of five residents were incorrectly executed and were therefore invalid. The Social Services Director was unaware of the Advanced Directive errors, the Social Services Director was unaware that her department was responsible to ensure the accuracy of Advanced Directives, the Social Services Director was unaware of how to correctly execute an OOH-DNR, and the Social Services Director was not a licensed Social Worker. This failure could affect all residents and lead to a decline in mental and psychosocial well-being, and residents' wishes not being honored. The findings were: During an interview with the Social Services Director on 05/05/2023 at 12:36 p.m., the Social Services Director stated she was currently enrolled in a Social Work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public, for 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 67 resident restrooms reviewed, 1 (400/500 hall) of 2 resident shower rooms reviewed, and 1 (500 hall) of 2 public restrooms reviewed, in that: 1. The sink in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loosely affixed to the wall. 2. The resident shower room serving 400 and 500 halls had a foul odor and had soiled briefs in two trashcans. 3. The public restroom located on 500 hall had clothing and trash in the floor and there was brown liquid in the commode. 4. Resident #68 was not provided a safe, functional, sanitary, or comfortable environment due to non-functional window blinds. 5. Resident # 74 was not provided a safe, functional, sanitary, or comfortable environment due to the smell of cigarette smoke in her room from the smoking area outside her closed window. These failures could lead to residents living in,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its resident for 3 of 16 employees (the DM, the AD, RN T) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure the DM, the AD, and RN T completed resident rights training within the previous year. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings were: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed the DM was hired on 09/06/2011. Record review of the DM's training history revealed the DM had not completed resident rights training in the last year. b. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed the AD was hired on 06/20/2022. Record review of the AD's training history revealed the AD had not completed resident rights training in the last year. c. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed RN T was hired on 07/23/2020. Record review of RN T's training history revealed RN T had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required compliance and ethics training for 5 of 16 employees (CNA O, DM, AD, MDS, and RN T) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA O, DM, AD, MDS, and RN T completed compliance and ethics within the previous year. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed CNA O was hired on 03/21/2022. Record review of CNA O's training history revealed CNA O had not completed ethics training in the last year. b. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed the DM was hired on 09/06/2011. Record review of the DM's training history revealed the DM had not completed ethics training in the last year. c. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed the AD was hired on 06/20/2022. Record review of the AD's training history revealed the AD had not completed ethics training in the last year. d. Record review of Staff Roster,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 8 of 16 employees (CNA O, DM, AD, MDS, RN T, LVN C, LVN F, and SS) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA O, the DM, the AD, the MDS, RN T, LVN C, LVN F, and the SS completed behavioral health training within the previous year. These failures could place residents at risk of not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. The findings were: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed CNA O was hired on 03/21/2022. Record review of CNA O's training history revealed CNA O had not completed behavioral health training in the last year. b. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed the DM was hired on 09/06/2011. Record review of the DM's training history revealed the DM had not completed behavioral health training in the last year. c. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 12/13/2022, revealed the AD was hired on 06/20/2022.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to facilitate the inclusion of the resident or resident representative in the care planning process for 3 (Resident #68, #4, and #10) of 8 residents care plans reviewed, in that: The facility failed to include Resident's #68, #4, and #10 or resident representative in their Care Conference meeting. This failure could affect residents and place them at-risk by contributing to inadequate care. The findings included: Resident #68 Record review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with the primary admitting diagnosis of other neurological conditions related to stroke and dementia. Resident #68's summary BIMS score was 9, indicative of moderately impaired cognition. Record review of the Progress Note written by SS for Resident #68 dated 3/13/2023 at 11:25 AM revealed an attempt to reach Resident #68's responsible party but no indication that the care plan meeting was held, an attendance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after there was an update for 1 of 39 residents (Resident #16) whose care plan was reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's care plan reflected full code instead of DNR. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving the incorrect care and cause health complications with subsequent illness. The findings were: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 05/04/2023, revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: schizoaffective, bipolar type, shortness of breath, dementia, and Parkinson's disease. Further record review revealed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) as Yes. Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/03/2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 09, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #16's care plan, reviewed 12/09/2021,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #35) of 10 residents reviewed for safe administration of medications, in that: Resident #35 was administered 3, 300 mg capsules of Gabapentin when 1, 300 mg capsule of Gabapentin was ordered. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of drugs and biologics, worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions such as physiological and/or psychological addiction. The findings include: Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with traumatic brain dysfunction associated with cerebral infarction [stroke] as the primary medical condition category for admission. Her current BIMS summary score of 10 was indicative or moderately impaired cognition. Active diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression. Pain assessment interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-07-31 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift for 1 of 4 days [PH1] reviewed for nursing services. The daily staff posting was not posted on 7/28/25. This failure could result in residents and visitors not knowing how many staff were providing services to the residents. The findings were: In an observation on 7/28/25 at 9:35 a.m., the daily staff posting was not observed in the facility lobby, at the nursing station, or the beginning of each hall. In an observation on 7/28/25 at 12:30 p.m., the daily staff posting was not observed in the facility lobby, at the nursing station, or on any of the halls in the facility. In an observation and interview on 7/28/25 at 3:55 p.m., CNA A stated she was unsure of what the daily staff posting was or where it was located. The daily staff posting could not be located throughout the nursing station area. In an observation an interview on 7/28/25 at 4:00 p.m., the ADON stated she was unsure of where the daily staff posing was located and it could not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,877 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $13,877 — penalty dated 2024-05-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUADALUPE COUNTY HOSPITAL BOARD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2015 |
| 1215 ASHBY PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| GANN, KODY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| 1215 ASHBY OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2025 |
| ALLEN, GARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675641. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.