Avir at Winnsboro
910 South Beech Street, Winnsboro, TX 75494 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (903) 342-5243 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,554 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-25)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 38.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.45 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.47 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.8%CMS range 30.3–63.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.3–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.7–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 68.9 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #170) reviewed for supervision.The facility failed to ensure Resident #170 eloped (via foot) from the facility to a local energy service company (0.7 miles) on the night of 06/13/25 at 7:45 PM. Resident was found 4 1/2 hours later at 12:24 am on 6/14/25.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 6/13/25 and ended on 6/14/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.This failure could place residents at risk for injuries due to not receiving the appropriate level of supervisionFindings included:Record Review of profile sheet dated 6/24/25 at 12:20 p.m., indicated, Resident #170 was diagnosed with dementia without behavioral disturbance (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life).Record Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated on 06/13/25, indicated Resident #170…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised which resulted in Resident #1 leaving the facility on 08/12/24, walking approximately 0.5 miles , and crossing a busy 2 lane road. The facility failed to ensure the ADON put measures in place to keep Resident #1 from leaving the facility when she said she saw Resident #1 climb the fence. The facility failed to monitor and put measures in place to keep Resident #1, who was high risk for elopement, from eloping after voicing wanting to go home. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 08/12/24 and ended on 08/14/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of potential accidents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel for 1 of 7 (the park place hall) medication carts reviewed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure LVN A locked and secured the park place hall medication cart while not in use and unattended on 06/25/26. This failure could place residents at risk for misuse of medication, overdose, drug diversions, adverse reactions of medications, and not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 06/25/2026 at 11:46 AM revealed LVN A left the park place medication cart unlocked and unattended in the hallway while she was in a resident's room. The park place medication cart lock was sticking out indicating it was unlocked and the cart was facing out toward the middle of the hallway while other staff and residents were in the hallway. LVN A said she was passing meds and was asked for assistance to help in a resident's room, and she just forgot to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation.1. The facility failed to ensure the pulled pork was properly thawed before cooking.2. The facility failed to ensure the peas, sweet potato fries, cinnamon rolls, and an unknown type of breaded meat were dated and labeled.3. The facility failed to ensure the baking trays were properly stored and not stored in an office between boxes.These deficient practices could place residents at risk for food borne illness.The findings were:Observation during an initial tour of the kitchen on 6/23/25 at 9:20 a.m. revealed 3 packages of pulled pork were frozen, thawing out on a table near a sink. There was no water in the sink and the pork was still solid. The pork was sitting out at room temperature. Several bags of frozen cinnamon rolls and sweet potato fries were in gallon sized freezer bags that were not labeled and dated. Peas and some type of breaded meat were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided and received food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for palatable food. 1.The facility failed to provide meal services in a manner to ensure palatable food served was appetizing to residents.2.The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Residents #60, #66, #58, and other anonymous complaints made during the resident council meeting who complained the food served did not taste good.These failures could place residents at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life.Findings include:During an interview on 6/23/25 at 10:03 a.m., Resident #60 said the food at the facility was not good. He said he preferred to not eat at the facility. He said he kept snacks in his room so he could get enough to eat since he did not eat much from the kitchen. During an interview on 6/23/25 at 10:15 a.m., Resident #66 said he liked living in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs, for 1 of 5 (Resident #53) residents reviewed. The facility failed to care plan Resident #53's JP, also called a Jackson Pratt drain (a surgical suction drain that gently draws fluid from a wound to help you recover after surgery). This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included:Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #53's face sheet, dated 06/25/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic kidney disease, also called chronic kidney failure (involves a gradual loss of kidney function), malignant neoplasm of kidney (a cancerous tumor in the kidney) diabetes (a disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #1).The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's oxygen filter was in the back of the concentrator.This failure could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections and exacerbation of respiratory disease.Findings Included:Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/25/25 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses heart failure, personal history of COVID, altered mental status, anxiety, and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated she made herself understood and was able to understand others. The MDS also indicated she had a BIMS score of 3 which indicated she had severely impaired cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for trauma-informed care.The facility did not ensure Resident #15's care plan had specific triggers for his diagnosis of PTSD, also known as post-traumatic stress disorder (a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). Resident #15 had a history of trauma.This failure could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization.Findings included:Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 06/25/25, indicated Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old male, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY BASED on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident #30)The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's Remeron (mirtazapine) (antidepressant medication) was decreased on 04/10/25 when the medical director signed the pharmacy recommendation and agreed to decrease the Remeron (mirtazapine) from 22.5mg to 15mg every night. This failure could place residents who received antipsychotic medications at risk of receiving unnecessary medication.Findings include:Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 06/25/25 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, depression, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #30's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated he usually makes himself understood and usually understood others. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 5 which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.9%, based on 2 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #66 and Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to ensure LVN P administered Resident #66's medication of Omeprazole (a medication used to treat conditions involving excessive stomach acid production) correctly on 06-24-25.The facility failed to ensure LVN Q administered Resident #1's medication of fluticasone (a corticosteroid used to treat a variety of inflammatory conditions, primarily those related to allergies and asthma) correctly on 06-24-25.These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions.Findings included:1.Record review of a face sheet dated 06/25/225 indicated Resident #66 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 21 residents reviewed in sample (Resident #1).The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have hibliclens antiseptic skin cleanser (skin cleanser usually used in surgery to prevent skin infections) in her bathroom on the shelf.These failures could place residents at risk of injury.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/25/25 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses heart failure, personal history of COVID, altered mental status, anxiety, and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated she made herself understood and was able to understand others. The MDS also indicated she had a BIMS score of 3 which indicated she had severely impaired cognition. The MDS also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for it's residents competently during both day-to-day operation, including nights and weekend, and emergencies for 1 of 1 facility assessment reviewed for administration and 1 resident who received dialysis (Resident #53).The facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected dialysis patients.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for inadequate care or treatmentsThe findings include:Record review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] (date of assessments or update) read in part: . Special Treatments and Conditions . dialysis. Number/Average or Range of Residents . 0 . Record review of Resident #53's face sheet, dated 06/25/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #53 had diagnoses which included Chronic kidney disease, also called chronic kidney failure (involves a gradual loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #5 and Resident #2) reviewed for resident abuse. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #5 was free from abuse when Resident #6 attempted to choke and struck Resident #5 on the middle of his back on 12/25/24. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse when Resident #3 slapped Resident #2 on his left upper arm on 12/20/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 12/20/24 and ended on 12/26/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 03/06/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses Schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects everything from how you think to how you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. (Resident #4) The failed to ensure CNA/Van Driver K did not take Resident #4's debit/credit card and use it for her personal use. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 08/12/24 and ended on 08/12/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, misappropriation of property, misappropriation of physician ordered medications and dignity. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 03/06/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of dementia (memory loss), depression, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated he had clear speech, understood others, and was understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life and failed to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response 3 of 3 groups. There was no documentation of the facility's effort to resolve grievances concerning beds not being made daily and cold food collected at Resident Council meetings on 2/29/2024, 3/27/2024, and 4/18/2024. This failure placed residents at risk of not having grievances addressed or provided a rational for facility decisions for issues identified Findings included: Record review of a Resident Council Meeting Form dated 2/29/2024 indicated the group council voiced their beds were not made daily and hot foods should be hot. The form failed to address how the grievances would be managed. The AD signed the Resident Council meeting form on 2/29/2024. Record review of a Resident Council Meeting Form dated 3/27/2024 indicated the group council voiced their beds were still not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail delivered to the facility for 5 of 5 confidential residents reviewed for right to communication The facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on the weekend. This failure could affect residents in the facility who receive mail at risk for not receiving mail in a timely manner that could result in a decline in resident's psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a Resident Council Meeting Form dated 2/29/2024 indicated the council was asked, Do you receive mail timely and on weekends?. The resident council answered no. Record review of a Resident Council Meeting Form dated 3/27/2024 indicated the council was asked, Do you receive mail timely and on weekends?. The resident council answered no. Record review of a Resident Council Meeting Form dated 4/18/2024 indicated the council was asked, Do you receive mail timely and on weekends?. The resident council answered no. During a confidential group interview on 5/07/2024 at 2:00 p.m., 5 of 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to accurately update Resident #10's comprehensive care plan with her code status. This failure could affect residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial outcome and inaccurate medical records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's (a progress disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), atrial fibrillation (irregular often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), depression (persistent depressed mood), and anxiety. Record review of Resident #10's significant change in status MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #9's) and 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's bathroom was free of offensive odors and unbroken and misshaped tiles around the base of the toilet. The facility failed to ensure the dining room did not have plastic, folding tables used as dining tables. This failure could place residents at risk for an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/07/2024 indicated, Resident #9 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn and make decisions and solve problems), weakness, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder (mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 4 of 6 (Resident #40, Resident #33, Resident #4 and Resident #23) residents reviewed for the care plan. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #40 needs to be in the secure unit 2. The facility failed to care plan or write an order for Resident #33's to be in the secure unit. The facility failed to care plan Resident #33 was a smoker. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's comprehensive care plan addressed she received a prophylactic antibiotic. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's comprehensive care plan was person-centered to include his diagnosis of PTSD and any triggers he had. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #38, Resident #12, and Resident #33, ) reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure the fall mat was in place for Resident #38. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 and Resident #33 had a smoking assessment done monthly per facility policy. These failures could place residents at risk for injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #38's face sheet, dated 05/07/24, indicated Resident #38 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #38 had diagnoses which included Dementia (loss of memory), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and depression(sadness). Record review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/19/24, indicated Resident #38 usually understood and was usually understood by others. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 8 residents (Residents #11, #54, #50, and #55) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA K administered Resident #11's Clindamycin (antibiotic), Eliquis (anticoagulant), Keppra (antiseizure), and Vimpat (antiseizure) timely as ordered at 8:30 a.m. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA K administered Resident #54's Tylenol (pain medication), Coreg (blood pressure), Gabapentin (used to treat pain), and Isosorbide (blood pressure) timely as ordered at 8:30 a.m. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA K administered Resident #50's Tylenol (pain reliever), timely as ordered at 8:30 a.m. 4. The facility failed to ensure MA K administered Resident #55's oxcarbazepine (antiseizure) timely as ordered at 9:00 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviewss, the facility failed to ensure residents who used psychotropic drugs were not given those drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs. The facility failed to follow the pharmacy recommendation to discontinue Resident #62's Seroquel/quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) on 04/25/24 therefore Resident #62 received 13 more doses of Seroquel. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse consequences such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. Findings included: Record review of Resident #62's face sheet dated 05/08/24, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), insomnia (problems with falling and staying asleep), left femur fracture (left thighbone break),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 38% based on 16 errors out of 42 opportunities, which involved 4 of 8 residents (Residents #11, #54, #50, and # 55) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Residents 11, 54, 50, and 55 medications were administered during the scheduled time. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: 1) Record review of a face sheet dated 5/08/2024 indicated Resident #11 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of seizures, anxiety, high blood pressure and depression. Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 was sometimes understood and usually understood others. Resident #11's BIMS score was a 5 indicating she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 7 of 7 confidential residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff provided food that was palatable and appetizing temperature on 5/08/2024 for confidential residents. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. Findings included: During an initial tour interview on 5/06/2024 between 9:28 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., 2 confidential residents voiced their meal trays, when received, were cold. During a confidential group interview on 5/07/2024 at 2:00 p.m., 5 residents said the food trays served on the halls were cold. Record review of the food temperature log dated May 8,2024 indicated the Regular meat's temperature at the time of serving was 188 degrees Fahrenheit, the cooked vegetables were 170- and 171-degrees Fahrenheit, and the dessert was 33 degrees Fahrenheit. During an observation on 5/08/2024 at 11:50 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to accurately update Resident #10's comprehensive care plan with her code status. This failure could affect residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial outcome and inaccurate medical records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's (a progress disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), atrial fibrillation (irregular often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), depression (persistent depressed mood), and anxiety. Record review of Resident #10's significant change in status MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #14, Resident #17) and laundry services reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's catheter bag was not touching the floor. 2. The failed to ensure CNA H wiped correctly and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care for Resident #17. 3. The facility failed to ensure laundry staff handled infectious laundry using the appropriate PPE. 4. The facility failed to ensure soiled laundry was transported to prevent the spread of infection. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 05/09/2024 indicated Resident #14 was an [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents #14 and #36). The facility did not ensure Resident #14's catheter drainage bag was covered for one day. The facility failed to ensure CNA C did not feed Resident #36 while standing. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 05/09/2024 indicated Resident #14 was [AGE] years old, re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare - surgery on skin and subcutaneous tissue (deepest layer of the skin), urinary tract infection, schizoaffective disorder(mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms such as hallucinations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 22 residents (Residents #4) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's call light was accessible. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, health complications and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/07/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4's diagnoses included dementia (memory loss), depression (persistent depressed mood), and urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system). Record review of Resident #4's comprehensive care plan dated 03/18/24, indicated Resident #4 has had an actual fall and has potential for injury related to falls due to unsteady gait, history of previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative immediately when there was an accident or significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status that is, a deterioration of health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #39) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify Resident #9's representative when Resident #9 sustained a fall on 02/18/2024. The facility failed to notify Resident #39's representative when Resident #39 sustained a fall on 03/31/2024. This failure placed residents' at risk of not having their representative being aware of any changes in their conditions and could result in delay in treatment and decline in residents' health and well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/07/2024 indicated, Resident #9 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights of confidentiality of medical records for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #'s 1 and 35) reviewed for medical record confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure MA E closed the EMR of Resident #'s 1 and 35's medication regimen prior to her walking away from the medication cart during the passing of medications. This failure could place residents at risk of their medical information being provided to unauthorized personnel, other residents, or visitors. Findings included: 1)Record review of a face sheet dated 5/08/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of heart failure, and keratoconjunctivitis (inflammation of both the cornea and the conjunctiva, which can be infectious or non-infectious causing ocular dryness, burning, and foreign-body sensation and grittiness). Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 1/19/2024 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property. The facility failed to follow their policy on abuse for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #'s 10 and 36) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report Resident #10's injury of unknown to HHSC when bruising was found to her perineum. The facility failed to report Resident #36's injury of unknown to HHSC when bruising was found to his bilateral buttocks and left chest. These failures could place residents at risk of being abused and neglected. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Reportable Events dated 12/1/2018, indicated . All residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation . The facility will provide and ensure the promotion and protection of resident rights. It is everyone's responsibility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 2 of 22 resident (Residents #'s 10 and 36) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report Resident #10's injury of unknown to HHSC when bruising was found to her perineum. The facility failed to report Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility inaccurately coded Resident #41 as having had a weight loss on his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 05/08/24, indicated a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all limbs and body from the neck down), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), anemia (a condition in which the blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells, to carry oxygen all through the body), and neurofibromatosis (a condition that causes tumors to form in the brain, spinal cord, and nerves). Record review of Resident #41's comprehensive care plan dated 01/10/24, indicated Resident #41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's diabetic wound was being monitored for improvement or worsening. This failure could place residents at risk of complications which include worsening of existing wounds, development of new wounds, and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 05/08/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #44 had diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (problems with the metabolism that causes brain dysfunction), dementia (memory loss), history of diabetic foot ulcer (an open sore or wound on the foot that develop in patients type 1 or type 2 diabetes), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (long-term condition in which the body has trouble…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for quality of care. The facility did not ensure Resident #23's trauma screening was completed upon admission to the facility. This failure could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 05/08/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugars and using it for energy), post-traumatic stress disorder (disorder in which a person has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and secured properly for 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerators, and 1 of 6 medication carts (Zone 7 medication cart) 1. The facility failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for storage of controlled drugs in the refrigerator of the medication room. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA E locked her medication cart and secure the keys to the medication cart during medication pass. These failures could place residents at risk for a drug diversion of their medications. Findings included: During medication pass observation on 5/07/2024 at 9:25 a.m., MA E left the medication cart to administer medications to Resident #6 in room [ROOM NUMBER] leaving the medication cart unlocked, with the keys to the cart on the top right-hand side. During an interview on 5/07/2024 at 9:25 a.m., MA E said she should have locked her cart and taken the keys with her when she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a policy identifying those cirumstances when the loss or damage of dentures was the facility's responsibility and failed to provide or obtain dental services to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 9 (Resident #30) residents reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to provide dental services when Resident #30 lost his dentures. The facility failed to have policies and procedures for lost dentures. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for oral complications and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 05/08/2024 indicated Resident #30 was an [AGE] year-old male re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of genitourinary system (organs of the reproductive and urinary system), colitis (inflammation of the colon), calculus (stone) of kidney, hematuria(blood in urine), weakness, astigmatism (a curvature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure 3 sheet pans were free from a brown colored grease like build up on the inside corners of the sheet pans. 2. The facility failed to ensure 2 cast iron skillets were free from a carbon build up not covering the inside walls and the outside of the skillet. 3. The facility failed to ensure the juice machine was free from dusty like material on the front and sides. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: During observations on initial tour on 5/06/2024 at 9:28 a.m., the following was found: *2 cast iron skillets with a large amount of black encrusted carbon buildup on the inside and the outside. *3-1/4 sheet pans with dark brown build up appears to be caked on grease material was on the inside corners of each pan. *Juice machine had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #40 and Resident # 18) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to maintain Resident #40's hospice binder containing information related to hospice services provided for the resident. The facility failed to obtain Resident #18's most recent hospice plan of care. These deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 05/07/24 indicated he was an [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic Zithromax was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate use of an antibiotic for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #44) reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 had documented signs and symptoms and diagnosis to support the use of prescribed antibiotic Zithromax. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 05/08/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #44 had diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (problems with the metabolism that causes brain dysfunction), dementia (memory loss), history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident and hazards for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accident hazards. CNA B and CNA C failed to ensure Resident #2's Hoyer lift (an assistive lift device that allows for transfer using electrical power) transfer was performed correctly. CNA D did not lock Resident #1's bed during incontinent care. These failures could place dependent residents at risk for falls, significant injuries and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 1/9/24 indicated Resident #2 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, dementia, high blood pressure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 had unclear speech, rarely made herself understood and rarely understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's responsible party when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychological status for one resident (Resident #41) reviewed for notification of change of condition, in that: The facility failed to notify Resident #41's responsible party when Resident #41 sustained a fractured finger after an incident where Resident #41 had another resident sit in a chair and caught Resident #41's finger in between chairs. This failure placed residents' caregivers at risk of not being aware of any changes in their conditions and could result in a delay in treatment and decline in residents' health and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 11/29/23 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses atrial flutter (a common abnormal heartbeat), Pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #31, Resident # 32, Resident #33, and Resident #41) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to include Resident #31's behavior to take others food and drinks in her care plan after she was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation for taking another resident's milk on 06/26/2023. 2. The facility failed to care plan Resident #32's and Resident #33's risk for resident-to-resident altercations after an altercation that occurred between them on 07/19/2023. 3. The facility failed to care plan Resident #41's right finger fracture (diagnosed on [DATE]). These failures could place the residents at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #34, Resident #35, Resident #36, and Resident #37) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA C (no longer employed) documented on Resident #36's narcotic record the time of administration for 1 dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a narcotic medication used for pain) given on 06/16/2023. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA B documented on Resident #37's narcotic record the time of administration for 1 dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen given on 10/17/2023. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA B documented on Resident #35's narcotic record the time of administration for 1 dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen given on 11/23/2023. 4. The facility failed to ensure MA A documented on Resident #34's narcotic record the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's electronic record reflected the residents accurate skin conditions during her respite stay from 10/04/23-10/08/23. This failure could place residents at risk of worsening skin integrity and decline in comfort level. The findings included: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet dated 11/29/23 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/08/23. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included heart disease( a heart condition that includes diseased blood vessels, structural problems, and blood clots), chronic kidney disease stage 4(disease in which the kidneys do not function as they should to filter waste from the body), chronic diastolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public in 3 of 3 showers (Whispering Lane shower, Park Place shower, and Texas Boulevard shower), and 1 of 3 public restrooms (nursing station area public restroom) observed. 1. The facility failed to ensure the three common shower rooms were free of black and green substances growing in the grout, towels lying on the floor, and a pink slimy substance growing on the undersurface of the shower chairs. 2. The facility failed to ensure the bathtub in the public restroom was free of a black substance . These failures could place residents at risk of infections and a loss of dignity. Findings included: During an observation on 04/04/2023 at 11:50 a.m., clean and folded towels and wash cloths were sitting exposed on the half wall petition in the communal shower room on Park Place Hall; used and un-labeled toothpaste was on the sink; and the dirty linen and trash barrels were stored in the shower. During an observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to remove Resident #12's facial hair. This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment, decreased self-esteem, or decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 04/05/23, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia(symptoms affecting memory), respiratory failure(disease that makes it difficult to breathe), heart failure(the heart does not pump the way it should), osteoarthritis(cartilage at ends of bones wear down), and anxiety(excessive worrying causing increased heart rates and breathing). Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for transfers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was transferred using a gait belt. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries and falls. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 04/04/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance (memory loss with behaviors), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (stroke affecting left side), and diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body process blood sugar). Record review of Resident #5's comprehensive care plan, dated 07/08/22, indicated he had a self-care deficit related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication error rates of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.14 %, based on 2 errors out of 28 opportunities, which involved 1 of 7 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for medication administration . The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 received aspirin (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory) and magnesium oxide (supplement) at the correct dosage. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet indicated an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), and atrioventricular block (heart beats more slowly). Record review of Resident #23's consolidated physician's orders, dated 03/04/2023, indicated she was prescribed aspirin delayed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 6 medication carts (main street medication cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the main street hall medication cart was locked when the ADON left the floor and left the cart unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of taking medications not intended for them with adverse outcomes; risk of loss/interruption in receiving medications. Findings included: During an observation on 04/03/23 from 11:46 a.m. to 11:57 a.m., the main street hall medication cart was left on the main street hall unlocked and unattended while nurse had left it to go to the dining room. During an observation and interview on 04/03/23 at 11:57 AM, the Corporate Clinical Nurse walked up to the cart and tried to hide her hand while she locked the medication cart. The Corporate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 16 residents (Residents #5 and #23) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. CNA A failed to wash or sanitize her hands before, in between glove changes, and after performing peri care to Resident #5. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ADON used gloves when she administered Resident #23's eye medication. 3. The facility failed to ensure the ADON did not dry Resident #23's eyes with the same tissue used to clean Resident #23's nose. These failures could place residents at risk for infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 04/04/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,554 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $12,441 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
- $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-03-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TITUS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2018 |
| BOECHMANN, PATRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/07/2025 |
| 910 S BEECH ST OPCO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| GULDE, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/19/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/19/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/19/2025 |
| 910 S. BEECH ST PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| DONALD, CHRISTINE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675812. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.