No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Lubbock

4710 Slide Rd, Lubbock, TX 79414 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (806) 797-3481 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)6 immediate-jeopardy citations$69,307 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $69,307 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4630 50th St Ste 406 · (956) 815-8912 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
4847 Slide Rd · (806) 792-8267 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5031 50th St
Park
5212 57th St · (806) 775-2687 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.9%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.672.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.092.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.7–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.6–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
70.0%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 66.9 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-15)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse and neglect for two of five residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from sexual abuse when Resident #2, who had a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors, placed her hand inside Resident #1's panties. The facility's DON failed to implement interventions upon Resident #2's admission on [DATE], when LVN F informed him Resident #2 was masturbating, and after Resident #2 inappropriately touched him on his pants. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/04/25 at 6:18 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility's Administrator and DON on 09/04/25 at 6:18 PM. While the immediacy was removed on 09/05/25 at 6:07 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity level of no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for two of five residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to implement their policies and procedures for identifying and addressing at admission Resident #2's history of inappropriate sexual behavior to prevent Resident #2, from placing her hand inside Resident #1's pantie. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/04/25 at 6:18 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility's Administrator and DON on 09/04/25 at 6:18 PM. While the immediacy was removed on 09/05/25 at 6:07 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity level of no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems, and because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and/or hazards as possible for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, and Resident #2 received supervision to prevent Resident #2, who had a history of sexual behaviors, from sexually abusing Resident #1, when she put her hand in her panties. Resident #1 was on one to one (1:1) supervision due to a previous incident of aggression with a different resident; however, she was allowed to alone in her room with Resident #2. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/04/25 at 6:18 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility's Administrator and DON on 09/04/25 at 6:18 PM. While the immediacy was removed on 09/05/25 at 6:07 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity level of no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of the residents to be free from abuse and neglect for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for abuse A. The facility failed to keep Resident #2 safe from abuse when Resident #1 pulled her out of bed after already exhibiting increased aggressive behavior on 11/14/24. B. The facility failed to keep Resident #3 safe from abuse when Resident #1 grabbed her in the face after already exhibiting increased aggressive behavior on 11/14/24. C. The facility failed to keep Resident #1 safe from an unknown nighttime staff when allegations of abuse was made on 11/23/24 by Resident #1 and Family Member M to CNA A, C, the Assistant Activity Director, LVN B and a confidential individual. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/27/24 at 12:49 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:49 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/27/24 at 1:28 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for abuse. A. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the allegation of abuse to HHSC and documenting his investigation/prevention measures regarding Resident #1 by an unknown nighttime staff on 11/23/24 . CNA A, C, the Assistant Activity Director, LVN B, and a confidential individual failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the allegation of abuse involving Resident #1, reported by Resident #1 and Family Member M on 11/23/24 to the abuse preventionist between the dates of 11/23/24-11/27/24. B. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the incident to HHSC and investigating an injury of an unknown origin involving Resident #1 that occurred and that was documented on 11/11/24. C. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and/or record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent development of new pressure ulcers/injuries for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for pressure injuries, in that: 1. LVN A failed to implement proper wound care techniques and implement adequate infection control practices to promote wound healing during observation of wound care on 11/29/2023. 2. LVN A failed to follow orders for wounds for providing wound care for Resident #1 and Resident #2, leaving wounds open to air and exposed to bacteria and possible infection. 3. Facility staff failed to treat and cover wounds for Resident #1 and Resident #2 4. Facility failed to follow doctors' orders of providing a wound culture (is a test to find germs such as bacteria, a virus, or a fungus that can cause an infection) for Resident #1 This failure could cause resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-02-08 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #63) reviewed for mental health services, in that: The facility failed to administer a dose of Resident #63's Risperidone (antipsychotic used for bipolar and schizophrenic disorder) for a week. There were behavior changes as consequences to the medication being discontinued. This failure affected one resident and placed resident at risk of emotional distress, negative behavior changes, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: Resident #63 Record reviewed Resident #63's face sheet revealed that the resident was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease, depression, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed on 01/28/26 to seal food stored in the dry storage and food stored in the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.Findings included: The following observation was made on 05/14/2026 at 11:25 a.m. during the tour of the kitchen: Dry Storage:Spaghetti noodles stored in zip lock bag not sealed.Garlic powder with lid open.Salt with spout open. Refrigerated Storage:Prepared drink on a metal sheet pan with no cover.Plate of salad with no date.Package of turkey breast lunch meat with no date and not sealed. During an interview on 05/14/2026 at 12:29 p.m., the DM stated all food in the refrigerator should be sealed and dated. She stated all dry storage food should be sealed and closed. During an interview on 05/15/2026 at 01:50 p.m., the DM stated the purpose of sealing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-15 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 3 of 11 residents reviewed for smoking. (Residents #25, #43, #49)The facility failed to follow smoking policy for Residents #25, #43, #49.This failure could place residents at risk of smoking while unsupervised.Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 05/15/2026 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #25 had diagnoses which included hepatic encephalopathy (damaged liver allows toxins to build up in blood), anxiety (feeling of fear or worry), depression (mental illness) and hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of Resident #25's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated she had a BIMS score of 09, which indicated she had mild cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #25 used tobacco. Record review of Resident #25's Care Plan Report dated 04/23/2026 revealed no care plan for smoking.Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was within reach for Resident #6 on 05/14/2026 and 05/15/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary assistance they need to maintain their highest level of independence. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 05/15/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: dementia (memory loss), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), depression (illness that involves the body, mood and thoughts), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Record review of Resident #6's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 24 residents hand sinks (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) in that: The facility failed to ensure the hot water in the hand sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was at a comfortable temperature.The facility failed to ensure the hot and cold water in the hand sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was functioning properly. These failures could lead to residents experiencing a diminished quality of life and a lack of home-like environment and/or comfort. The findings include: During a confidential interview on 05/13/2026 at 09:30 AM the confidential resident stated there was no warm water in the hand sinks in the residents' bedrooms. The resident stated they often had to wash their hands with cold water, causing their hands to feel cold. The resident stated they felt the facility did not take the cold water issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with an accurate PASRR Level I for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that:Resident #10 did not have an accurate and updated PASRR Level 1 assessment, reflecting a diagnosis of mental illness. This failure could place residents, with an inaccurate PASRR Level 1 and no PASRR Level 2 Evaluation, at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #10's electronic face sheet dated 05/14/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet included the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (primary) (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body resulting from a stroke), Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, severe without psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 24 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #39) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop an accurate, consistent, and completed care plan for Resident #12, specific to Resident #12's dietary needs ordered by the physician.The facility failed to develop an accurate, consistent, and completed care plan for Resident #39, specific to Resident #39's PASRR needs and services. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their individualized needs. Findings include: Resident #12Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 05/15/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices based on the comprehensive assessment of residents for 1 (Resident #11) of 22 residents reviewed for weight assessment. The facility failed to follow physician orders for weekly weights for Resident #11. This failure placed residents at risk of weight loss and overall decline in health.Record review of the admission record for Resident #11, dated 05/14/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: severe dementia with agitation (cognitive decline with emotional distress), depression (mood disorder that causes feelings of sadness and loss of interest in activities), schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type (a mental health condition with severe mood swings), and protein-calorie…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to store oxygen nasal cannula off the floor.2. CNA E failed to replace nasal cannula after finding it on the floor. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 05/15/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: dementia (memory loss), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), depression (illness that involves the body, mood and thoughts) atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 2 of 2 medication carts (Station 1 medication cart and Station 2 medication cart), reviewed for medication storage. 1. The medication cart assigned to Station 1 contained two loose pills.2. The medication cart assigned to Station 2 contained four loose pills. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and place the facility at risk of drug diversions.1. On 05/14/26 at 11:03 AM an observation of the medication cart for Station 1 was conducted with MA A. Two loose pills were found in drawer of the medication cart. MA A placed the pills in a dispensing cup and took them to the DON for identification. The DON identified the medication as Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 (1 tablet) and Zofran 4mg (1 tablet). MA A destroyed the loose pills by crushing them and placing them in the sharps container. During an interview on 05/14/26 at 11:10 AM, MA A stated the medication cart should not contain loose pills. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to monitor, review and reconcile Resident #3 medication administration record from on 8/21/25 which resulted in an official unknown count of (Hydrocodone) to be unaccounted for.This failure could places at an increased risk of drug diversion and misuse of resident medications or possibly make resident medication unavailable to meet their clinical needs.Findings included:Resident #3Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, 9/03/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include muscle weakness, pneumonia (infection in the lung), intellectual disability (disability that affects cognitive ability), nonspecific skin eruption (skin rash). Record review of Resident #3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 3 of 5 medication carts (1 nurses medication cart for memory care on Station 2, 1 nurses medication cart for Station 2 and 1 medication aide cart for Station 1), reviewed for medication storage.The facility failed to maintain proper medication storage after the following was found:The nurse medication cart located on Station 2 contained medication Lorazepam (2MG/ML; dated 8/11/25) that required refrigeration for Resident #4. The nurse's medication cart for Memory care located on Station 2 contained medication (2MG/ML; dated 8/03/25) that required refrigeration for Resident #6. The medication aide cart for Station 1 contained medication Lorazepam (unable to see the dose) that required refrigeration for Resident #5. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications that are not effective or that could expire faster than the printed date.Findings included: An observation of Station II memory medication cart was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident's comprehensive care plans by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 (Resident #8) of 12 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to update or add interventions to Resident #8's care plan regarding aggressive and physical behaviors toward other residents that occurred on 08/05/25 and 08/29/25. These failures could result in residents not receiving the care that they need.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 09/03/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (memory loss), psychotic disturbance (mental health condition characterized by loos of touch with reality), mood disturbance (significant change in a person's emotional state), anxiety (increased worry), cognitive communication deficit (Difficulty communicating), depressive episodes (periods of significant low mood or loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen be free from unnecessary drugs without adequate indications for its use for 2 of 12 (Resident #4 and Resident #6) reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4 PRN orders for psychotropic drugs (Lorazepam (2MG/ML) were limited to 14 days and or provide a physician's rationale indicating that it was appropriate for the PRN order to exceed the 14 day stop date.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6 PRN orders for psychotropic drugs (Lorazepam (2MG/ML) were limited to 14 days and or provide a physician's rationale indicating that it was appropriate for the PRN order to exceed the 14 day stop date.This failure could lead to residents being prescribed medications without indication and place residents at risk of unnecessary side effects and a decline in overall health.Findings included:Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 09/0325, revealed a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living and receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 5 residents (Resident#1, #2, and #3) observed for ADL care to ensure they were receiving appropriate hygiene in that: The facility failed to provide showers for Residents #1, #2, and #3 on their scheduled shower days. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Resident #1: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 03/09/2023 with diagnoses that included: Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere (mental decline that affects thinking, memory, reasoning, personality, mood and behavior), Urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than 5 percent. The facility had a medication error rate of 9.38% based on 3 errors out of 32 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #10) reviewed for medication administration. 1. LVN A failed to administer Resident #6's Certizine medication according to physician orders, resulting in Resident #6 receiving the medication late. 2. LVN A failed to verify the dosage on Resident #6's Simethicone 125 mg medication order prior to administering the medication, resulting in Resident #6 being underdosed. 3. LVN A failed to verify the dosage on Resident #10's vitamin D3 125 mcg medication order prior to administering the medication, resulting in Resident #10 being underdosed. These failures could place residents at risk of incomplete therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and decline in health. Findings included: Resident #6 Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. 1) The facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at appetizing temperatures for 3 of 3 food forms served (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) at 1 of 1 meal observed (03/12/2025 lunch). These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During confidential individual interviews, 3 of 5 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability and temperature. One Resident stated, this morning I didn't eat my breakfast because it had no taste. Another Resident stated, it's the lunch and the dinner that's not always good, the flavor, the food is cold sometimes. One other Resident stated that the other food was cold, the scrambled eggs, I just ate my oat meal and that was it. During the confidential Resident Council interviews…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 of 12 residents (Residents #3, #28, #46, #40, #62, #6 and #10) reviewed for infection control. 1. MA A failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff between resident use for Resident #3 and Resident #28. 2. LVN B failed to utilize hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care on Residents #46, #40, and #62. 3. LVN B failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for Residents #46, #40 and #62. 4. LVN A failed to utilize hand hygiene between residents during medication administration for Resident #6 and Resident #10. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. The findings include: During a medication administration observation on 3/12/2025 at 7:34 AM, MA A used the blood pressure cuff to take Resident #3's blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 2 of 24 resident reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #40 and Resident #32) 1. The facility failed to obtain consent from Resident #40 or the responsible party for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders). 2. The facility failed to obtain consent from Resident #32 or the responsible party for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders). This failure could place residents at risk for receiving psychoactive medications without consent and knowledge of side effects. The findings include: Record review of Resident #40's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 had a medical history of paranoid schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness characterized by disruptions in thought, perception, emotion, and behavior), rhabdomyolysis (serious condition where damaged skeletal muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #40 and #32). 1. The facility failed to ensure a PRN order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) dated 11/28/2024 and Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) dated 12/18/2024 had a stop date to ensure the medication did not extend beyond 14 days for Resident #40. 2. The facility failed to ensure a PRN order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) dated 12/16/2024 had a stop date to ensure the medication did not extend beyond 14 days for Resident #32. This failure placed residents with PRN psychotropic drugs at risk for side effects of psychotropic drugs and placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: Record review of Resident #40's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 2 of 4 medication carts (Station 1 medication cart and Station 2 medication cart), reviewed for medication storage. The medication cart assigned to Station 1 contained loose pills. The medication cart assigned to Station 2 contained loose pills. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and place the facility at risk of drug diversions. The findings included: On 03/12/25 at 9:23 AM, an observation of the medication cart for Station 1 was conducted with LVN A. Two loose pills were found in the bottom drawer of the medication cart. LVN A placed the pills in a dispensing cup and took them to ADON A for identification. ADON A identified the medication as Buspirone 10 mg (2 tablets). LVN A destroyed the loose pills by placing them in the sharps container on the medication cart. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 9:25 AM, LVN A stated there should not be loose pills on the medication cart. She stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed to ensure foods were processed and pureed under sanitary conditions. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: The following observations were made on 03/11/25 at 11:00 AM during observation of puree meal preparation: After pureeing new potatoes, the DM took processor bowl, lid, and blade to 3 compartments sink and cleaned all 3 parts shaking liquid off all 3 parts. The DM took all 3 parts back to processor base and assembled. The bowl had liquid in bottom and lid was dripping liquid. The DM prepared puree bread then took processor bowl, lid, and blade to 3 compartments sink and cleaned all 3 parts shaking liquid off all 3 parts. The DM took all 3 parts back to processor base and assembled. The bowl had liquid in bottom and lid and blade was dripping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility observed for pest control. 1. The facility failed to follow the instructions from the pest control company to have multiple holes fixed in the facility that rodents potentially used for access into the building between 1/10/2025 and 2/25/2025. The noncompliance was identified as PNC . The noncompliance began on 1/10/2025and ended on 3/3/2025. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk for the spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of facility's document titled Service inspection Report dated 1/10/2025 revealed: After speaking with [Maintenance Man A] and [ADM ], there is a good plan for getting all the holes fixed which ultimately will fix the mouse issue. Spoke with ADM and taking a day to focus on getting the holes fixed and also mentioned hiring a contractor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care in that: 1. The facility failed to accurately document ADL services for Resident #1. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of cerebral infarction (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain cells to die), muscle weakness, and reduced mobility. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS revealed Section C- Cognitive patterns a BIMs score of 0 which indicated resident is rarely/never understood. Section GG- Functional Abilities revealed resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for 7 of 7 residents (Resident#1, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15)) observed for ADL care to ensure they were receiving appropriate hygiene in that: The facility failed to provide showers for Residents #1, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15, on a routine basis. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Resident #1: Record review of an admission Record dated for Resident #1 shows a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 12/18/2024 and a readmission date of 1/6/2025 with diagnoses of transient ischemic attack (TIA) (mini stroke), and cerebral infarction (stroke), Paranoid schizophrenia , Metabolic encephalopathy (a problem with the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), Urinary tract infection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal medical records for 1 of 1 resident was reviewed for privacy (Resident #8). 1. LVN B left Resident #8's information up on the screen while her computer cart was on the other side of the nurse's station, and she was at the nurse's station. The computer screen was left up with Resident #8's information up and residents were walking by, putting Resident #8's information at risk. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and misuse of personal information. Findings Included: Resident #8: Record review of an admission Record review for Resident #8 showed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 7/21/2022 and a readmission date of 11/23/2024 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, fluid overload, atrial fibrillation, insomnia, lesions of oral mucosa, muscle spasm, edema,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) and the Abuse Coordinator for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for abuse. A. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the allegation of abuse to HHSC regarding Resident #1 being hit by an unknown nighttime staff on 11/23/24. B. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the resident-to-resident altercation (Resident #1 attempted to pull Resident #2 out of bed) that occurred on 11/14/24 between Resident #1 and Resident #2 to HHSC. C. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the resident-to-resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to have evidence all allegations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for abuse. A. The ADM failed to investigate Resident #1's allegation of abuse made against an unknown nighttime staff on 11/23/24. B. The ADM failed to investigate a resident to resident altercation (Resident #1 attempting to pull Resident #2 out of bed) that occurred on 11/14/24. C. The ADM failed to investigate a resident-to-resident altercation (Resident #1 grabbed Resident #3 in the face) that occurred on 11/14/24. These failures could place residents as risk for abuse and neglect by not investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Findings included: Resident #1 Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/22/24, revealed an [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia (memory loss). Record Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan (problem, goal, and approach) was updated to reflect his increasingly ongoing incident of physical and verbal aggressive behaviors. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/22/24, revealed an [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember), with other behavioral disturbance (behavior concerns), other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (damage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen-Schedule III 300-30 mg tablet every 6 hours-as needed (PRN) for pain on 10/30/24 from 6 A.M. to 1:50 P.M. This failure placed the resident at risk of increased pain and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 10/31/24 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. This report included Resident #1's diagnoses as unspecified pain, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with rest pain to right leg (severe burning pain in your legs and feet that continues even when you're…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. A. The ADM failed to follow the facility's abuse policy when Resident #1 reported allegations of abuse involving Resident #2 on an unknown date. B. The ADON failed to follow the facility's abuse policy when CNA A reported that Resident #1 alleged that CNA A was involved in abusing Resident #2 on 09/26/24. This failure could place residents as risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised May 2023 revealed: Policy The facility will provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Reporting/Response The facility will have written procedures that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the administer of the facility and to other officials including the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #1 & 2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. A. The ADM failed to report an allegation of abuse involving Resident #2 that was reported to him on an unknown date by Resident #1. B. The ADON failed to report an allegation of abuse involving Resident #2 that was reported to him by CNA A on 09/26/24. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. Findings included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent resident abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) of five residents whose records were reviewed for abuse. Facility staff did not implement facility policy and immediately notify administration when FM #1 reported on 6/23/24 to LVN A that CNA B was rough with Resident #1 during a transfer. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of abuse if the reportable allegations are not reported timely after they are discovered. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated indicated Resident #1 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (Primary, Admission), Pneumothorax, Cognitive communication deficit, Heart Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of a Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS of 4 which indicated severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported an allegation of when FM #1 reported on 6/23/24 to LVN A that CNA B was rough with Resident #1 during a transfer. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of abuse if the reportable allegations are not reported timely after they are discovered. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated indicated Resident #1 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (Primary, Admission), Pneumothorax, Cognitive communication deficit, Heart Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of a Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS of 4 which indicated severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident # 2) of 8 Residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. - The facility failed to identify and develop an intervention for Resident #2's behaviors of exposing his penis and urinating on the floor in the unit in Resident #2's comprehensive person-centered care plan. This failure could affect residents currently in the facility receiving care per comprehensive person-centered care plans resulting in resident no being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of a face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for staffing. The facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff in the memory care unit to provide supervision to assure resident safety. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being met. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 6/25/24 indicated Resident #2 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to ensure foods were processed, stored, and pureed under sanitary conditions. 2) The facility failed to ensure food and non-food contact surfaces were clean. 3) The facility failed to ensure staff stored personal items in a manner that prevented contamination. 4) The facility failed to ensure food was accurately dated and labeled. 5) The facility failed to protect foods from potential contamination. 6) The facility failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints in food areas. 7) The facility failed to ensure sanitizer were at recommended concentrations and used according to manufacturer recommendations, 8) The facility failed to rapidly reheat potentially hazardous hot food to 165 degrees F prior to placing on the steam table. 9) The facility failed to ensure that potentially hazardous cold foods were maintained at 41 degrees F or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 6 of 22 resident rooms (2, 7, 8 ,9, 47, and 49) and 2 of 4 baths (Station 1 - Bath #1 and #2) , reviewed for environment. 1)The facility failed to ensure resident use equipment were safe and in good repair (Rooms 2, 7, 8, 9 and Station 1 - Bath #1 and #2). 2)The failed to ensure rooms #47 and #49 had running water available in the sinks in their rooms 3)The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER] had an operating air conditioner/heater unit in the room. These failures could place residents at risk for living in an unsafe, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Observation on 2/6/24 at 5:58 PM in Bath #2, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being for two of 22 residents (Residents #18 and #69) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #18 regarding dialysis. 2. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #69 regarding insulin for treatment of the diagnosis of diabetes. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their individualized needs. Finding included: Resident #18 Record review of the undated face sheet for Resident #18 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses of cerebral infarction, unspecified (stroke), unspecified inflammation of eyelid (history of), other specified glaucoma (vision disorder), palpitations (irregular heart beat), essential hypertension (high blood pressure),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for medications (#11 and #18 ). 1)The facility failed to accurately acquire and administer medications as ordered for two residents (Residents #11 and #18). Resident #11 missed doses of ordered Plavix (antiplatelet medication) and Resident #18 missed doses of hydralazine (blood pressure medication) and hydrocortisone eye ointment (anti-inflammatory medication). These failures could place residents at risk of experiencing missed medications which could result in the exacerbation of their medical conditions and a decline in health status. The findings included: Resident #18 Record review of the undated face sheet for Resident #18 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors ( Resident #11). The facility failed to restart Resident #11's physician's ordered Plavix after a dental appointment. The resident was without her Plavix (blood thinner to treat stroke, heart attack, and other heart related disorders), for approximately 10 months (2/22/23 thru 12/19/23). This failure could result in residents having risk of heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and risk of hospitalizations. Findings include: Resident #11 Record review of the current undated face sheet for female Resident #11 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (heart disease), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure (heart failure),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly in the cart for 1 of 2 medication carts (med cart on South Hall). MA B had loose pills in the medication cart assigned to her on South Hall. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and drug diversions. The findings include: Record Review of Resident #42's face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of: paralysis following stroke affecting right side, depression, anxiety, urgency of urination, allergic rhinitis, type 2 diabetes with high blood sugar, congestive heart failure, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, cirrhosis (chronic liver damage from a variety of causes leading to scarring and liver failure) of the liver, muscle wasting and atrophy, high blood pressure, reduced mobility. Record Review of Resident #50's face sheet reflected he was a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 8 of 24 residents (Residents #4, 32, 35, 51, 67, 69, 70 and 75) reviewed during mealtimes. The facility failed to ensure Residents #4, 32, 35, 51, 67, 69, 70 and 75 received their meals according to the menu for 2 of 3 food forms (mechanical soft and puree) This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss and hunger. The findings included : Resident #4 Record review of the current undated face sheet for male Resident #4 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The resident was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses of unspecified, focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, status, unknown, subsequent and encounter (brain injury), dysphasia, oral phase (swallowing disorder), sleep disorder, unspecified, and diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition without complications (blood sugar disorder). Record review of the current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe, and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. 1) The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 3 of 3 food forms served (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) at 1 of 1 meal observed (1/8/24 lunch). These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During confidential individual interviews 6 of 16 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability. One resident stated The food is always cold. It's all meals. Another resident stated, The foods are hard. One other resident stated, It sucks. It's not good. The hamburger buns are hard occasionally, and it has poor flavor. A resident stated that the food was so bad that she had to buy her food somewhere else. The resident added that the food was so bad that it made her throw up. Another resident stated, The food is cold and Does not taste…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 22 residents (Residents #43) reviewed for advance directives. 1. Resident #43's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) and physician orders were not consistent. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their end of life wishes honored and incomplete records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #43's face sheet, dated 02/06/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include paranoid schizophrenia (mental disorder), rhabdomyolysis (rare muscle injury) and pain. The face sheet also revealed Resident #43's advance directives were: Do Not Resuscitate. Record review of Resident #43's active physician order summary dated 02/06/24 revealed physician orders listed code status: full code with a start date of 09/27/23. Record review of Resident #43's Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate form revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan must be prepared by an interdisciplinary team to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s)of the care plan conference for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #33 and Resident #43) reviewed for comprehensive resident centered care plans. The facility failed to invite Resident #33 and Resident #43 or the representatives to attend their care plan conferences. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #33 Record review of Resident #33's face sheet, dated 02/07/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to Benign neoplasm of pineal gland (central nervous system tumors, which begin in the brain), Reduced mobility (unsteadiness while walking, difficulty getting in and out of a chair, or falls), Symptomatic epilepsy (a type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure, at the time of discharge, the communication of necessary information for a safe transition of care home for 1 of 1 (Resident #81) records reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to provide an accurate and complete plan of care for 1 of 3 closed records (Resident #43) with plans of services for home, a list of medications in laymen's terms submitted, or a sign receipt of plan of care. This failure has the potential to affect all residents and places them at risk of not receiving appropriate resources once discharged home. Findings included: Resident # 81 Record reviewed Resident # 81's face sheet revealed that the resident was[AGE] years old and admitted [DATE] with the following diagnoses: acid reflux dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle wasting and atrophy (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle), type 2 diabetes with low blood sugar, nasal congestion, allergic rhinitis (allergic response causing itch, watery eyes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 3 meals (2/06/24 - Supper) observed for 2 of 2 residents with orders for puréed and mechanical soft diets (Residents #32 and #75). The facility failed to provide food that was in a form to meet resident needs, 1 of 3 meals observed (2/06/24 - Supper) for 2 of 2 residents with orders for puréed diets (Resident #75) and mechanical soft diets (Resident #32). This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake and choking. The findings included: Resident #75 Record review of the current undated face sheet for female Resident #75 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (stroke with right weakness), aphasia (cognitive disorder), pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 2 of 3 (Residents #66 an #73) and 2 of 2 (ADON B AND LVN C) staff reviewed for infection control. 1. ADON B failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes when providing wound care for Resident #66 2. LVN C failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes when providing wound care for Resident #73. 3. LVN C failed to keep dirty and clean supplies separated when providing wound care for Resident # 73. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination. Findings include: Resident #66 Record review of face sheet for Resident #66 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: symptomatic epilepsy (seizure disorder), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles in the blood),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 4 and Resident # 5) reviewed for dignity. CNA N made a video of Resident #5 yelling and cussing and posted it on a social media platform on 11/16/2023. Facility sent Resident # 4 to secondary provider day center on 11/21/2023 without a coat, shoes or wearing a bra. CNA B and LVN A failed to cover residents during wound care or incontinent care or provide privacy on 11/29/2023. This failure placed all residents at risk of psychosocial harm due to a diminished quality of life. Finding included: During an interview on 11/30/2023 at 5:05 PM, Resident #5's family member stated that family had noticed a video on snapchat that was title Resident #5's first name Chronicles and the video showed a table and in the background, they could hear Resident #5's voice. The family member stated they were not able to see Resident #5 only hear her yelling and cussing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of the residents needs and preferences for residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to provide a call light or call pad system to 2 resident rooms (19 and 21) observed during investigation process. During an observation made on 11/29/2023 at 11:59 AM. Observed Resident #3's face pad call light on the floor between the bed and nightstand. Resident #3 was unable to reach and get the call light off the floor. During an observation made on 11/29/2023 at 1:40 PM. Observed Resident #2's call light was on the floor on the right side of the head of the bed. During an observation made on 11/29/2023 at 1:42 PM. Observed Resident #1's call light was wedged at the end of suction machine on the nightstand on left side of the bed. During an observation made on 11/29/2023 at 1:45 PM. Observed Resident #3's face pad call light on the floor between the bed and nightstand. Resident #3 was unable to reach and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 2 of 6 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) located on 1 of 2 nurse stations (Station 1) by not storing hazardous material properly. The facility failed to discard scalpel after debridement of wound and left on bedside table in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 11/29/2023. The facility failed to store hazardous material (1 disposable scalpel) and (1 bottle of Dermal Wound Cleaner) in a secure manner. These failures could place residents at risk for avoidable injuries and infections related to skin punctures. The findings included: During an observation on 11/29/2023 at 10:15 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed 1 disposable scalpel with a blue handle and clear plastic blade cover, located on the overbed table, and 1 bottle of Dermal Wound Cleaner located on the overbed table. The Dermal Wound cleaner label had a statement keep out of reach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #1 and Resident #2). 1. LVN A failed to provide adequate infection control practices while cleaning a wound for Resident #1 on 11/29/202, by not washing hands. 2. LVN A failed to provide adequate infection control practices by incorrectly cleaning a wound from outer to inner wound and contaminating the wound. 3. CNA B failed to provide adequate infection control practices by not washing hands and placing a dirty wipe on the same bed as the Resident #2, behind his back during incontinent care. 4. The NP failed to dispose of used scalpel that was used to debris resident wound. This failure could affect residents and staff members by placing them at risk for the transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-05 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 (Residents #1 and #3) of 6 residents reviewed. The facility failed to implement a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for Resident #1 and Resident #3. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk for insufficient immediate care needs for the resident being met and maintained. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Cerebral vascular accident (interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain), xerosis cutis (rough dry skin that may have scales or small cracks), hypo-osmolality (a condition were the levels of electrolytes, proteins, and nutrients in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #2 within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: rotator cuff tear of unspecified shoulder, pressure ulcer of sacral region, pain, postprocedural hematoma (blood clot) of skin and subcutaneous tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors (Resident #2). The facility failed to administer a dose of Resident #2's IV antibiotic scheduled for 8:00 PM on 09/01/2023. There was no adverse consequence to the missed dose. This failure could result in the resident's infection to relapse and increase of the risk of re-hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: rotator cuff tear of unspecified shoulder, pressure ulcer of sacral region, pain, postprocedural hematoma (blood clot) of skin and subcutaneous tissue following procedure, sepsis (body's extreme reaction to an infection), candida stomatitis (fungal infection of the mouth), nicotine dependence, anxiety disorder (persistent worry about everyday situations), and constipation. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured in locked compartment in that, one medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended on Station 1 hallway. One medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattened on 100 Hallway on intial observation rounds. This failure could result in the theft or misuse of medication, potentially could cause accidental poisoning. Findings include: During initial round observations on 09/02/2023 at 9:55 AM, there was an unattended 100 Hallway Medication Cart three rooms down from where MA was administering medications. Staff and residents were observed in the 100 Hallway. HHSC Investigator VII stood by cart for 5 minutes. When the MA returned, she stated, I never do this. I am so sorry, as she was locking her cart back. During interview on 09/02/2023 at 2:48 PM, the MA stated she had been working here for a month and had been a MA for 9 years. The MA apologized again, stating, I never do that, and I know better. The MA stated that residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$69,307 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $9,487 — penalty dated 2025-09-05
  • $38,714 — penalty dated 2024-11-01
  • $3,510 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
  • $17,596 — penalty dated 2023-12-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX 1 of 5Brightpointe at Lytle LakeAbilene, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2018
CHUMLEY, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2018
4710 SLIDE RD OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
CREASON, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
MENDEZ, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2026
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2026
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2026
4710 SLIDE RD PROPERTY OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 5%Other / private 21%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$222per resident / day
operating cost
$6,743per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$212per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455940. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next