Avir at San Angelo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 84.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free from accidents and hazards for 31 (All resident on 100 Hall) of which 5 of 31 (Resident #81,82, 20, 40, and 77) had cognitive decline that could still access their sinks, of 90 residents. -Temperature readings for the public restroom on the 100 hall were 128 degrees Fahrenheit. -The temperature reading in the restroom to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on the 100 hall was 128 degrees Fahrenheit. -5 residents on the 100 hall had cognitive decline and could access their sinks. An Immediate Jeopardy to residents' health or safety was identified on 12/21/23. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to Administrator on 12/21/23 at 7:23PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 12/22/23 at 7:38PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm and a severity level of a pattern as the facility began lowering water heater…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2025-03-06 · tag F0685 — pattern
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist the residents in making appointments to ensure residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for one of two residents (Resident #45) reviewed for hearing devices. The facility failed to make an appointment for an audiologist for Resident #45 after the Responsible Party requested one on 8/20/24. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased communication ability, quality of life, and/or social isolation. The findings included: Review of Resident #45's admission Record, dated 2/29/25, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hearing loss. Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/29/24, revealed: She had a BIMS score of 5 of 15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment); She had minimal difficulty hearing (Difficulty in some environments e.g. when person speaks softly or setting is noisy); and She wore hearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2025-03-06 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist the residents in making appointments to ensure residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for one of two residents (Resident #45) reviewed for hearing devices. The facility failed to make an appointment for an audiologist for Resident #45 after the Responsible Party requested one on 8/20/24. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased communication ability, quality of life, and/or social isolation. The findings included: Review of Resident #45's admission Record, dated 2/29/25, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hearing loss. Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/29/24, revealed: She had a BIMS score of 5 of 15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment); She had minimal difficulty hearing (Difficulty in some environments e.g. when person speaks softly or setting is noisy); and She wore hearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2023-09-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received the correct prescribed seizure medication Carbamazepine, which resulted in the resident having a seizure and was transferred to the hospital. Resident #1 missed 6 doses of the medication from 08/11/23 through 08/13/23. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 on 08/14/23. The noncompliance was determined to be past noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 08/11/23 and ended on 08/14/23. The facility had implemented the actions that corrected the noncompliance before the surveyor's entrance to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of complications from deterioration in health, and hospitalizations. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for PASRR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to refer Resident #21 to the State-designated authority for a PASRR Level II review when she was admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and a PASRR Level 1 positive for mental illness. This failure could place residents with mental illness at risk of not receiving a PASRR Evaluation, individualized care, or special services to meet their needsFindings include: A record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 5/7/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included depression (mental health condition that causes a persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities), anxiety (cognitive decline caused by vessel damage that features panic like episodes), schizophrenia (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of three residents (Resident #11) and 9 of 47 sharps containers reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure bed alarm was plugged in while Resident #11 was in bed as indicated on his current comprehensive care plan and current physician's orders. The facility failed to ensure sharps containers were replaced when full in 9 rooms (Rooms: 105, 106, 108, 109, 111, 113, 207, 210, and 401). The failures could place residents at risk for injury.The findings include: 1. Resident #11 A record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 05/7/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (A group of thinking and social symptoms which interferes with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated.2. The facility failed to ensure prepared food was discarded after 72 hours (3 days) per facility policy. 3. The facility failed to prevent cross-contamination of food items when pureeing food.4. The facility failed to ensure personal food items were not stored in 1 of 2 of the kitchen refrigerators. 5. The facility failed to ensure the dietary staff wore beard covers while in the kitchen.These failures could place residents who received prepared meals from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and cross-contamination. The findings included:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 05/05/2026 at 9:00 AM, the following was observed: The DM did not have a beard cover over his beard.Milk Refrigerator:A glass bottle of tea was opened.A container labeled ketchup…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 dumpsters reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure garbage was placed in a covered dumpster.These failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of illnesses, or be provided an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment.Findings include:Observation on 05/05/2026 at 10:15 AM of garbage area outside, revealed a large rectangle roll off dumpster that did not have a lid and the bags of trash were piled higher than the rim.During an interview on 05/07/2026 at 4:12 PM with the Administrator, he said they do not have a garbage disposal policy. He said he was aware of the roll off dumpster and he had instructed staff not to use it. He said he emailed city offices to get it hauled off. The administrator said that using it for regular daily trash could cause pests and trash could be scattered by the wind and/or pests.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs and describe the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #23, and Resident #42) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #23 for ADL dependence and means to address psychosocial needsThe facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan regarding hospice services for Resident #42.This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services. Findings include:Findings: Resident #23Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 05/06/2026, had revealed admission to the facility on 2/17/2026. Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had a trauma screening completed upon admission to the facility that identified possible triggers when Resident #8 had a history of trauma. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for psychological distress due to re-traumatization.The findings included: A record review of the face sheet, dated 05/07/26, reflected Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of PTSD (mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, and the medication error rate was 7.14% with 2 errors in 28 opportunities involving 1 staff (LVN D) and 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for medication pass. LVN D did not fully administer the crushed medications to Resident #3 via PEG tube. (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, a medical procedure used to insert a feeding tube directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall.) This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications as prescribed according to physician's orders and facility policy and procedures. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 05/07/2026 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident 3's physician's orders dated 05/07/2026 indicated in part: Lisinopril Oral Tablet 40 MG Give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 4 (hall 2 cart) observed for medication storage and security. MA C failed to ensure her medication cart was secured when it was left unattended on 05/05/2026. These failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion. Findings included: Observation and interview on 05/05/2026 at 9:14 AM the hall 2 medication cart was seen unlocked and unsupervised. The DON was made aware of the cart unlocked. The cart was inspected with the DON present. On the top drawer were several over the counter medication bottles. Inside the other drawers were some blister packs that contained several prescribed medications. The DON said that it was expected for the staff to lock the medication carts whenever they left the carts unattended. Interview on 05/05/2026 at 9:22 AM MA C said the hall 2 medication cart was the cart she had used today 05/05/2026. The MA said she was sure she had locked the cart when she had stepped away. MA C said she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #37) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to change her gloves after they became contaminated while assisting Resident #37 with incontinent care. This failure could place residents' risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding include: Record review of Resident #37's admission record dated 05/05/2026 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and unsteadiness on feet. He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #37's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in part: Urinary continence = Always incontinent. Bowel continence = Always incontinent. Record review of Resident #37's care plan revised on 05/07/2026 indicated in part: The resident has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to obtain treatment orders for wound care upon admission for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new pressure injuries, deterioration in existing pressure injuries, infection, and pain.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet undated revealed [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] from another nursing facility. Diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (the need for aftercare and follow up of a patient who has undergone surgical amputation), type 2 diabetes mellitus (metabolic condition where the body develops insulin resistance, causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$91,080 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $54,919 — penalty dated 2025-03-06
• $23,941 — penalty dated 2023-12-22
• $12,220 — penalty dated 2023-09-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX