No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Heritage Oaks

5301 University Ave, Lubbock, TX 79413 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 159 certified beds · (806) 795-8792 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (806) 795-8792 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2345 50th St · (806) 701-5797 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2604 50th St · (806) 701-5111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1701 50th St · (806) 744-2879 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4500 Avenue U · (806) 767-2712 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5201 University Ave · (806) 687-9420

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.3%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.0%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.2%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.0%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.072.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.432.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.9%CMS range 23.3–46.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.8–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified78.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.0–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.501.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.16
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
67.2%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 111.3 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-06)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 3 of 8 confidential residents (R#1, R#4, and R#6) in that: The facility failed to ensure staff were informed there was a working shower in the facility for residents reviewed for showers in 4 of 4 hallways (Halls AA, BB, CC, and DD). This could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings include:During an interview on 06/18/26 at 12:36 pm, R#6 indicated his showers were at night on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. R#6 said his last shower was on Thursday 06/11/26, and on Saturday 06/13/26 he asked for a shower. R #6 stated he was told by unknown staff there was no hot water. He stated on Tuesday 06/15/26, he asked the unknown night nurse and CNA for a shower, because the last shower he took was on Thursday 06/11/26, 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident with food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 5 of 8 confidential residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for food palatability in that: Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 voiced concerned about cold food and bread that was wet, soggy, and not toasted. This failure could result in a decline in residents' consumption of food, cause residents unwanted weight loss, and/or food borne illness. The findings included: Observation and confidential interview on 06/18/26 at 1:18 pm , Resident #1 was offered his noon meal in a Styrofoam container. This container included a Philly Steak, mashed potatoes, tossed salad and pudding. On the meal tray there was a 4-ounce glass of punch, Dash-salt free packet, one pepper packet, and one sugar packet. Resident #1 said most of the time his meal will not match the Meal Ticket. He said he has complained to the CNAs and the nurses that his meals are cold. Resident #1 said he has been informed that his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 5 of 8 confidential residents (R#1, R#2, R#3, R#4, and R #5) reviewed for meals. Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 voiced concerned about not having plates, cups, and eating utensils. These failures could result in a decline in residents' consumption of food and cause residents unwanted weight loss. Findings included: Resident #1Observation on 06/18/26 at 1:18 pm, Resident #1 was offered his noon meal in a Styrofoam container. His meal tray included a fork and 1 serving spoon. The eating portion of the spoon measured approximately 2 inches horizontally and 2 3/4 inches vertically. During a confidential interview 06/18/26 at 1:18 pm, Resident #1 said he has complained to the CNAs and the nurses that his food was not served on a plate, and his utensils include a fork, a large spoon, but not a knife. The CNAs and nurses have informed him that his hallway is the last one to receive their meals, and by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 1 of 1 meal (lunch meal on 6/10/2026) reviewed for meal accuracy, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the correct meal was served on 6/10/2026 according to the prepared menu for lunch for 108 residents. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff followed the correct weekly prepared menu. These failures could affect residents who received food from the kitchen by contributing to dissatisfaction, poor intake, and/or weight loss.The findings included: Observation on 6/10/2026 at 11:35 AM of the facility kitchen's dry pantry, freezer, and refrigerator revealed items in the dry pantry such as canned goods, breads, cereals, oatmeal, spices, and pasta. The freezer contained 2 cases of frozen fries, 1 case of corn, 1 case of zucchini, 3 cases of hamburger meat, 1 case of beef stew mix, 1 case of fish sticks, 1 case of egg omelets, 1 case of liquid eggs 1 case of broccoli. The refrigerator contained 2 cases of milk, 1 bag of shredded cheese, 2 boxed of diced potatoes, 1 case of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 2 (4/24/2026 and 4/25/2026) of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight hours on 4/24/2026 and 4/25/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Record review RN time punches provided by facility undated for RN coverage revealed no RN hours for 4/24/2026 and 4/25/2026. During an interview on 5/06/2026 at 12:18 p.m. with ADM, she stated there was no RN coverage for 4/24/2026 and 4/25/2026. During an interview on 5/06/2026 at 01:53 p.m. with ADM, she stated the purpose of having an RN 8 hours a day was to provide nursing support and help with higher level of knowledge. She stated the staffing coordinator and the DON were responsible for scheduling RN coverage. She stated the staffing coordinator, and the DON had been trained in scheduling. She stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 9 confidential residents in that:The facility failed to ensure staff were not on their personal cell phones while providing care, which included assisting residents with their showers. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings include: At an undisclosed date and time nine confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs while performing care made them feel ignored, not a priority, embarrassed, concerned the CNA could make a mistake due to distraction by the cell phone conversation, and, most of all, their privacy was violated. The nine confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs occurred on every shift. Confidential residents stated staff utilize their cell phones while performing showers, when performing care in resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 5 of 33 residents ( Residents #30, #32, #93, #127, and #130) reviewed for resident rights . The facility failed to obtain signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available for Resident #30, #32, #93, #127, and #130 prior to administering psychotropic medication. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving medications without their prior knowledge or consent, or that of their responsible party or being aware of the risk of the medications prescribed. Findings included: Resident #30 Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #1, 5, and 6) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #5, and #6 who was listed as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), had an Do Not Resuscitate form that did not have missed required information.These failures could place residents at risk of not having their end-of-life wishes honored and incomplete records. Findings include: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Acute Kidney Failure (rapid loss of kidney function), and Type 2 Diabetes (high blood sugar). The face sheet indicated under the advance directive section - DNR-Do Not Resuscitate. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 2 of 3 showers (Wildflower and Magnolia) and 2 of 12 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). The facility failed to ensure the Magnolia Shower had been repaired for approximately 4 months. The facility failed to ensure the showers in Magnolia and Wildflower units were held between water temperatures of 100-110 F degrees.The facility failed to ensure the bathroom sinks hot water in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were held between water temperatures of 100-110 F degrees.These failures could place residents at risk for lack of home-like environment and comfort. The findings include: During an interview on 5/4/2026 at 12:12pm with Resident #16, he stated the shower in the Magnolia unit had not been working for a while now and it was inconvenient. He stated they often had to get their showers in a different hall [Sunflower] further from their room and sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the residents for 9 of 9 confidential residents reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure 9 of 9 residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations, the Grievance Procedure, were provided information who the facility grievance official was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings include: In Interviews at an undisclosed date and time, 9 of 9 confidential residents stated they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of the Grievance procedure in prominent locations. The residents stated they did not know where to acquire a grievance form, who to turn the form into, and what happened once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 5 residents (Residents #8, #60, #99, #101, and 1 confidential resident) reviewed for food palatability. one of one kitchen. A. Resident #8, #60, #99, #101 voiced concerned of cold food, flavor and/or texture.B. Nine of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray were cold.C. One of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray was mushy.D. Three of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray had no flavor. E. Three of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray were chunky. F. One of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray was tough. These failures could result in a decline in residents' consumption of food and residents to have unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 2:37 PM, Resident #99 was asked how the food was and he responded by saying Some of them are not really good, no flavors, no taste. He stated that he ate at the dining. During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 2:49 PM, Resident #101 was asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in facility 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1) The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator (x1), and freezer (x1), were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 2) The facility failed to ensure the garbage can used for food waste was covered unless in use. 3) The facility failed to ensure the hair restraint was properly worn. 4) The facility failed to ensure the dish and pot washing area were clean. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.The findings included: During kitchen tour observations on 05/04/2026 that began at 9:34 a.m. and concluded at 10:15 a.m., revealed the following: -Garbage can, next to food prepping table, was uncovered and not in use. -Cook A, not properly wearing hair restraint to cover his mustache area. -Dirty black food residues under the pot & pan sink/draining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 2 dumpsters (#1 and #2), in that: The door for dumpster #2 was left open.Garbage and debris in the vicinity of the 2 dumpsters. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents.The findings included: Observation on 05/04/2026 at 10:21 a.m., revealed the facility's dumpster area, which was in the lot behind the dietary department had a commercial-size dumpster 3/4 full of garbage, with an open door (#2) and bags full of garbage on the floor around the dumpsters #1 and #2. During an interview on 05/06/2026 at 11:50 a.m., the DM stated, Everyone in the facility is responsible for keeping the dumpster area clean and closing the door, if you see a trash bag on the ground, pick it up and throw it into the dumpster. All staff members were responsible for monitoring such task. She further stated, I can't answer why the bags of garbage were on the floor because I don't know why. She stated, I have never had any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #58 and Resident #29) reviewed for infection control. CNA D failed to utilize EBP and hand hygiene during foley catheter (a flexible, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine, held in place by an inflated balloon) care on Resident #58.CNA E failed to utilize glove change and hand hygiene during incontinence care on Resident #29. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included:Resident #58Record review of Resident #58 undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #58 had a medical diagnoses of cerebral infraction (a blockage (clot or plaque) reduces blood flow to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respect and dignity.CNA C failed to provide privacy to Resident #1 when CNA C left Resident #1 naked in bed with the door open on 3/15/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of emotional distress, embarrassment, and lower self-esteem. Findings include:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm of the spinal cord (a cancerous tumor arising within or spreading to the spine), and paraplegia (impairment of motor and sensory function in the lower half of the body).Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Section GG- Functional abilities revealed Resident #1 was dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and/or neglect for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and/or neglect.MM A told Resident #1 to get the fuck out of my face on 3/20/2026.This failure could cause residents emotional distress, a decrease in their health conditions, or exacerbation of their health conditions.Findings include:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm of the spinal cord (a cancerous tumor arising within or spreading to the spine), and paraplegia (impairment of motor and sensory function in the lower half of the body).Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact.Resident #2Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male, originally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident's rights, that includes measurable short-term and long-term objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #1's care plan, a resident with an active Stage IV pressure ulcer, to reflect the use of a pressure-relieving mattress that was ordered by the physician on 11/8/25. This failure could place residents at risk for unclear staff guidance, inconsistent implementation of care, inadequate monitoring, delayed wound healing, and potential worsening or development of additional pressure injuries.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/05/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-15 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for smoking. (Resident #1)The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 followed the smoking policy and did not have smoking supplies (cigarettes and lighter) at his bedside. This failure could place residents at risk of injury or harm.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet undated indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Parkinsons (brain disorder), anxiety (feeling of fear and worry), hypertension (high blood pressure) and weakness.Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated he had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #1 was independent or needed set-up/clean-up assistance for most ADLs. The MDS indicated Resident #1 was using tobacco at the time of the assessment.Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 19 of 22 confidential residents. The facility failed on 03/07/2025 to ensure 19 of 22 confidential residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations; the Grievance Procedure, were provided access to the Grievance form, were provided information regarding who the facility grievance officer was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Interviews and Record Review during Resident Council on, 03/06/2025 at 10:30am, 19 of 22 confidential residents, stated they did not have access to the Grievance form, they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #63, Resident #71, and Resident #86) and 3 of 3 staff (LVN E, CNA H, CNA I) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA H failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing peri care for Resident #2, during observations of peri care on 03/06/2025 at 1:42 PM. 2. LVN E failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing wound care for Resident #63, during observations of wound care on 03/05/2025 at 11:33 AM. 3. CNA I failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing peri care for Resident #71, during observations of peri care on 03/05/2025 at 10:50 A. 4, LVN E failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing wound care for Resident #86, during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #98) reviewed for dignity issues: The facility did not place a urinary catheter drainage bag in a privacy bag to screen/cover it from view for Resident #98 on 03/06/2025 and 03/07/2025. This failure placed residents in the facility, with urinary catheters, at risk of feeling uncomfortable or embarrassed and decreased privacy. Findings included: Record review of Resident #98's admission Record dated 03/7/2025, a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 11/08/2024, with diagnoses that included the following: Osteomyelitis (a bone infection that happens when bacterial or fungal infections spread from other parts of your body into bone marrow); Pathological fracture (when force or impact didn't cause the break to happen, instead, an underlying disease leaves bones weak) , left femur (thigh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #2,) reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to follow physician's orders indicating Resident #2's oxygen humidification bottle should be monitored every shift and replaced or refilled as needed on 03/05/2025. 2. The facility failed to follow physician's orders indicating Resident #2's nasal cannula and oxygen tubing should be changed weekly on 03/05/2025 and 03/06/2025. These deficient practices have the potential to affect residents by placing them at an increased risk of respiratory infection, respiratory distress, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 03/07/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 01/19/2023 and included the following diagnoses: Acute respiratory failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1. The facility failed to change gloves and wash hands while preparing snack sandwiches on 03/05/2025 at 11:15 AM. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During an observation on 03/05/25 at 11:15 AM DA A was preparing sandwiches on prep table. DA A had gloves on. DA A left the prep table with gloves on and walked to the dry storage room. DA A returned to prep table with same gloves on and opened bag of potato chips and using gloves hand put potato chips in Styrofoam container with sandwich. DA A put right gloved hand into pocket to get sharpie marker. DA A wrote on Styrofoam container and placed marker back in pocket. DA A left prep table with gloves on and went into DM office. DA A returned to prep table with same gloves on and being preparing sandwiches placing them on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA A failed to utilize proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #2 2. CNA B failed to utilize proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident # 3. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #2's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a history of Dementia (impaired ability to remember), generalized anxiety disorder, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE], Section C Cognitive patterns revealed Resident #2 had a BIMs score of 08 which indicated the resident had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 2 of 2 resident for dignity and catheter care (Resident #64 and Resident #106); in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure respect and dignity to Resident #64 by LVN D knowingly leaving him lying in feces for over an hour, when he had a bowel movement during wound care. 2. The facility failed to place catheter tubing off the floor and place a cover on the catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings include: Record Review of Resident #64's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #102, #106, and #276) reviewed for privacy issues in that: 1. Housekeeper failed to knock and introduce herself prior to entering Resident #276 room. 2. NA failed to provide privacy by not pulling curtain all the way for Resident #102 during perineal care. 3. LVN E failed to pull the privacy curtain while providing wound care for Resident #102. 4. LVN G failed to pull the privacy curtain while providing wound care for Resident #106. This failure could cause residents to feel uncomfortable, disrespected, and possible exposure to anyone passing by. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #102 face sheet dated 2/22/2024 reveals a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of fracture of shaft on left tibia, reduced mobility, thrombocytopenia (low platelet level), high blood pressure, heart failure, pleural effusion (buildup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were accurately acquired, received, dispensed, and administered in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (Wildflower Cart A and B) , 2 of 2 medication rooms (Wildflower Med room A and Rapid med room B) and 1 of 1 treatment cart (Treatment cart A) reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure that all medical supplies stored in Cart A were not past their expiration date. 2. The facility failed to ensure that all medication stored in Cart B were not past their expiration date. 3. The facility failed to ensure that all medication stored in Medication room A were not past their expiration date. 4. The facility failed to ensure that all treatment supplies and medication in Treatment Cart A were not past their expiration date. 5. The facility failed to ensure all medical supplies in Medication room B were not past their expiration date. These failures placed all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and maintained in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 3 medication carts (Sunflower cart C), and 1 of 2 medication rooms (Rapid med room B) reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure proper temperature documentation of the refrigerator in Medication room B. 2. The facility failed to ensure all medication in Medication Cart C were properly labeled. These failures placed all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of medication labeling, and inadequate temperature monitoring. The findings include: During an observation of Medication Room B on 2/21/2024 at 11:15 AM it revealed the medication storage refrigerator in Medication room B had a temperature log dated 12/2023. The last checked temperature on 12/5/2023 with a logged temperature of 39 degrees Fahrenheit. Record review of documentation labeled Temperature Log for Refrigerator-Fahrenheit dated 12/23 revealed a logged temperature for dates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. 1) The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive for 3 of 3 food forms served (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) at 1 of 1 meal observed (2/21/24 lunch). These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During confidential individual interviews 9 of 32 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability and appearance. One Resident stated that the food it's crap to me. She stated she did not like the flavor and texture. Another Resident stated the food was horrible. It's cold it has no flavor, and the squash was mushy. It floats on the plate . Yet another Resident had concerns with food palatability. She stated, I don't like the food. One Resident said the presentation of the food was not good and did not look good. He stated that his family brings him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 4 of Residents (Resident #52, #61, #72, and #102) observed for infection control for 4 0f 8 resident's reviewed for infection control practices (Resident #52, #61, #72, and #102). 1. CNA A failed to wash her hands before, during, and after incontinent care of Resident #52. 2. LVN E failed to wash her hands properly. She turned on water, placed soap on hands, and immediately started washing hands under running water and not allowing soap to lather. LVN E used a dirty paper towel to turn off the faucet after wound care for Resident #102. 3. NA failed to wash her hands before, during, and after incontinent care for Resident #102. 4. LVN A did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff before or after use on Resident #61.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from neglect for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #64), reviewed for neglect when LVN D failed to provide incontinent care services to Resident #64 in a timely manner. LVN D neglected Resident #64 by failing to provide incontinent care when Resident #64 had a bowel movement during wound care when LVN D was aware of R#64's bowel incontinent episode. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk of abuse neglect, skin breakdown, mental anguish, emotion distress, infections, and possible serious harm. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #64's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmit date of 09/07/2023 with the following diagnoses of: type 2 diabetes with neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), pressure ulcer of the sacral region (stage 4), acute kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) when there was a significant change. LVN A failed to document notification of Family Member A or Family Member B when Resident #1 developed new open areas on his skin. LVN B and LVN A failed to document notification of Resident #4's Family Member C when he had a change of condition, and new orders were received. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for not having their family or legal representative notified when having a change of condition. The findings include: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's undated facesheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis of hemiparesis (muscular weakness) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) affecting right dominant side, nontraumatic intracerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX 1 of 5Brightpointe at Lytle LakeAbilene, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/16/2019
CHUMLEY, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/16/2019
5301 UNIVERSITY AVE OPCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2026
DANIEL, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2019
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
MENDEZ, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2019
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2026
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2026
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2026
5301 UNIVERSITY AVE PROPERTY OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 5%Other / private 20%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,172per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$231per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675346. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next