No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Caldwell

1022 Presidential Corridor Hwy 21 E, Caldwell, TX 77836 · For profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (979) 567-0920 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$10,036 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,036 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (94%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1103 Woodson Dr · (979) 567-7080 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
455 TX-36 · (979) 567-1446 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
525 State Highway 36 N · (979) 567-4977 · Call to confirm hours
Park
301 N Stone St · (979) 567-3271 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%2.4%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.1%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.3%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.0%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.402.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.572.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.551.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
94.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 47.4 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 94% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure ants were not found on Resident #1's body on 08/13/25 and 08/15/25 which caused large papules (small bumps on the skin that contain fluid or pus) from his right shoulder to elbow, right hip to mid-thigh, abdomen, and between the toes of his feet.2. Accurately document in Resident #1's EMR regarding the presence of ants/ant bites on his body.3. Ensure Resident #1 was moved to a different room after ants were found on his body on 08/13/25 until 08/15/25.This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/25/25 at 7:10 PM and a template was provided. While the IJ was removed on 08/26/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-08-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure ants were not found on Resident #1's body on 08/13/25 and 08/15/25 which caused papules (small bumps on the skin that contain fluid or pus) from his right shoulder to elbow, right hip to mid-thigh, abdomen, and between the toes of his feet. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/25/25 at 7:10 PM and a template was provided. While the IJ was removed on 08/26/25 at 7:06 PM, the facility remained at a level of no actual harm at a scope of pattern that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of discomfort, pain, or infection. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accidents hazards as was possible for one of two housekeeping carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) reviewed for hazards.The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Cart #1, with chemicals inside the compartments, was locked when unsupervised. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included: During an observation on 06/20/2026 at 8:15 a.m., Housekeeping Cart #1 was located on 100 hall in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation reflected the compartment where chemicals were stored was not locked and contained micro-kill bleach, disinfectant cleaner, and two bottles filled with chemicals without a label on the bottles. Observation reflected Housekeeper A was not standing near the housekeeping cart. She exited room [ROOM NUMBER] at 8:20 a.m. and walked to the housekeeping cart and was standing beside the cart. There were no residents or staff in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for drug storage and labeling.The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1, was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications. Findings included:During an observation of the 300 hall Nurses Station on 06/21/2026 at 7:34 a.m., revealed Medication Cart #1 was facing toward the hall area near the nurses' station. Observation reflected there was not any staff in the hall or near the nurse's station. Med Aide B exited a room approximately 7:45 a.m. on 300 hall and walked toward the nurse's station.During an interview with LVN B on 06/20/2026 at 7:50 a.m., he stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse from staff for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for verbal abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was protected from verbal abuse on 04/25/2026 when CNA A confronted Resident #1 and proceeded to yell and threaten her after Resident #1 reported her for sleeping at the nurse's station. This failure could place residents at risk of fear, depression, intimidation, and diminished quality of life.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/10/2026 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder (A mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep, feelings of guilt or inadequacy, and suicidal thoughts.) and anxiety (Fear characterized by behavioral disturbances.). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 comprehensive care plan reflected a plan of care for her diagnoses of PTSD and major depressive disorder that included medication management and psychiatric services. This failure could place residents at risk of increased symptoms, lack of treatment or diminished quality of life.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/10/2026 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder (A mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 2 (Residents #28 and #40) of 10 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #28 and Resident #40 for the months of November and December 2025.This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function.Findings included:Review of Resident #28's face sheet, dated 01/07/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features (a mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1 and Medication Cart #2) reviewed for medication storage.The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 and Medication Cart #2 were locked and medications were secured and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitorsThis failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the counter medications.Findings included:Observation on 01/06/2026 at 7:04 a.m. revealed the locking mechanism protruding outward (indicated the medication cart was unlocked) on the Medication cart #1 located in front of one of one nurses' station on unit 3. RN C was standing near room [ROOM NUMBER] and was unable to view the Medication Cart #1. She walked towards the nurses' desk when she observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality of records The facility failed to ensure MA D provided privacy by locking the privacy screen on the laptop and leaving the laptop unattended in the hallway on the medication cart which displayed Resident #40's medical information on 01/07/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information, personal or care instructions exposed to others and misuse of personal information.Findings included:Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 01/07/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female resident admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features (a mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents, for 2 of four residents (Resident #53 and Resident #55) reviewed for baseline care plans. A) The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission that addressed the care needs of newly admitted Resident #53. B) The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission that addressed the care needs of newly admitted Resident #55. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. The findings included: A) Review of Resident #53's face sheet dated 01/08/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses cerebral infarction (stroke that causes brain damage), diabetes mellitus type 2, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident #53's admission assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the preferences and goals of each resident and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #1 and #5) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was comprehensive and updated to reflect Resident #1 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's care plan was comprehensive and updated to reflect Resident #1 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, accessed on 1/06/2026, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 10/04/2025 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy(brain dysfunction), hypokalemia (a condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and once developed, failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident #46) The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's unavoidable sacral unstageable pressure ulcer (a severe type of wound where the full depth cannot be assessed due to the presence of necrotic tissue, slough or eschar covering the wound base) treatment was done per physician orders. These failures could cause severe pain, and lead to systemic infections for residents that have or are at risk for pressure ulcers.Findings: Review of Resident #46's face sheet dated 01/08/2026 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses unspecified intracranial injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for feeding tubes. (Resident #53) The facility failed to ensure Resident #53 had physician's orders for care of his gastrostomy tube site treatment, tube placement checks, or water flushes. The facility further failed to have a plan of care in place for Resident #53's gastrostomy tube. This failure placed residents with tube feedings at risk of injury, pain, and/or significant changes in condition.Findings Include: Review of Resident #53's face sheet dated 01/08/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain.), diabetes mellitus type 2, and dysphagia (swallowing problems). Review of Resident #53's admission assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #53 was assessed to be oriented to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 25 residents (Resident #56 and Resident #27) reviewed for infection control practices during medication pass. MA B failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff during medication pass before and after using it on Resident #56 and Resident #27. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and infections.Findings include: Review of Resident #56's face sheet dated 01/07/2026 reflected a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses congestive heart failure (long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs.), diabetes mellitus type II (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices (cleaning the ice machine, cleaning the ice machine scoop receptacle, storing, and stacking wet dishes on top of each other, ensure dish machine sanitizer levels are within the required range, utilization of an ice scoop receptacle with a lid, cleaning the walk-in cooler floor of food debris) for facility annual survey 10/14/2024-10/16/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure temperature logs were being completed for nourishment refrigerators for the facility annual survey 10/14/2024-10/16/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure all items were covered and stored properly for the facility annual survey on 10/14/2024-10/16/2024. 4. The facility failed to label and date all food items in the kitchen for facility annual survey on 10/14/2024-10/16/2024. 5. The facility failed to discard expired food product…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served reflected the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for all residents when the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for all residents for 2 of 2 meals observed. The facility failed to follow the posted menus for two lunch services served at the facility on Monday, 10/14/2024 and Tuesday, 10/15/2024. These failures could place residents that eat food from the kitchen at risk of poor intake, chemical imbalance, and/or weight loss. Findings included: Observation of posted menus on 10/14/2024 at 9:30 AM revealed menu items for lunch meal service to be chicken fried chicken, cream gravy, mashed potatoes, parslied carrots, dinner roll, and bread pudding. Observation of lunch meal service on 10/14/2024 at 12:08 PM revealed resident meal trays being served with chicken fried steak, cream gravy, mashed potatoes, parslied carrots, dinner roll, and bread pudding. Observation of posted lunch menus on 10/15/2024 at 10:40 AM revealed menu items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and attractive and prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. 1. The kitchen test tray of the lunch meal on 10/15/2024, the foods were bland, unappealing, and inedible. The kitchen test tray beverages of iced tea and iced water lacked ice. The kitchen test tray's cornbread and cake were both very dry and crumbly. 2. The facility failed to follow the puree diet recipe. The pureed garlic bread, pureed vanilla cake, pureed meat sauce and pureed pasta were all mixed with water during the puree process for the lunch meal on 10/15/24 and 10/16/2024 instead of something with nutritive value such as broth, milk, or juice. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 10/15/2024 at 10:43 AM of DA F revealed DA F pureed the vanilla cake with water instead of milk or something of nutritive value. DA F did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a quarterly trust fund statement was provided to the resident for 1 (Resident # 6) of 3 residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to provide quarterly statements to the resident receiving insurance funds. The failed practice had the potential to affect any resident who had a trust fund account managed by the facility. Findings included: Review of Resident # 6's face sheet dated 10/14/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an admit date of 12/31/2020 and a re-admittance date of 10/02/2024. Resident # 6 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency (impairment of the immune system function) due to drugs, morbid obesity, acute respiratory failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis(muscle weakness or partial paralysis) affecting right dominant side following cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), hyperlipidemia (high levels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 10 residents (Residents #41) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Resident #41's comprehensive care plan did not reflect Resident #41's ADL care requirements listed in their baseline care plan. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. Findings included: Review of Resident # 41's face sheet dated 10/16/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 41's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anemia, hyperlipidemia, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, obstructive sleep apnea,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update Resident #3's care plan to reflect current needs for meal assistance and refusal of meal assistance. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest practical well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident # 3's face sheet dated 10/14/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 3's diagnoses were Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, depressive disorders, insomnia, essential tremor, hypertension, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, history of falling, dementia, and personal history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 6 (Resident is #7, and Residents #32) residents reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7, and Resident #32 had effective pain management by not evaluating effectiveness of current pain medications. This failure could place resident at risk for increased pain causing undo suffering. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 10/14/24, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included osteoarthritis (a chronic disease-causing cartilage to break down over time), restless leg syndrome, and post laminectomy syndrome (a condition where a patient continues to experience pain after spinal surgery). Record review of the facility Pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's GDR recommended by the pharmacist consultant was followed up on for 6 months for Resident #38's antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. This failure could place residents receiving antipsychotic medications at risk for adverse health consequences. Findings included: Review of Resident #38's face sheet dated 10/16/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Huntington's disease (is a rare, inherited disease that causes the progressive breakdown (degeneration) of nerve cells in the brain) and Major depressive disorder recurrent severe without psychotic features (a mental condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 6 (Resident #11, and Residents #15) residents reviewed for infection control. LVN B failed to properly sanitize blood pressure cuff when moving from one resident to another resident when administering medications and obtaining blood pressure for Residents #11 and #15. This failure could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 10/16/24, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included paranoid personality disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood), and major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals, were in locked compartments and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, visitors , and residents for 1 of 2 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to prevent Medication Cart #1 from 8:30 AM to 8:40 AM being unattended and unlocked on the 400 hall on 08/24/2024. This failure could allow residents unsupervised access to prescription and over-the-counter medications. Findings included: Observation on 08/24/2024 at 8:30 AM of Medication Cart #1, it was in front of Resident # 1's room. The medication cart was unlocked. Med-Aide A was in Resident #1's room with her back toward the door entering into Resident #1's room. Surveyor B opened and closed the top drawer of Medication Cart #1. Med-Aide A did not turn around to check on Medication Cart #1. Surveyor B opened the second drawer of Medication Cart #1 and Med-Aide A turned around and walked toward Medication Cart #1. Did not observe any residents in the hall. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0555 — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the residents right to choose his or her attending physician for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) and the entire facility reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not honor any residents right to choose his/her primary care physician as his/her attending physician after the facility terminated their Medical Director agreement and changed the attending physician without notice to the residents or their representatives effective 07/04/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality of care and treatment due to their lack of free choice for their attending physician care while in the facility. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/19/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia-unspecified severity-without behavioral disturbance- psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a locked compartment for 2 (300 Hallway) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage in the facility. The facility failed to ensure that both medication carts for the 300-hallway remained locked at all times when not in use and direct view of staff. This failure could result in harm due to unauthorized access to medications by residents and visitors. Findings included: Observation on 06/12/2024 at 9:02 AM, revealed a multi-drawer, rollable medication cart that was left unlocked in front of the nurse's station in the 300 hallway. LVN A was seated in a chair behind the nurses' station working at a computer and RN C was present viewing paperwork. Two residents were seated in a common area watching television approximately twenty feet from the cart. Observation on 06/12/2024 at 9:39 AM, revealed that the cart observed at 9:02 AM was still in the same location unlocked and now a second multi-drawer, rollable medication cart was next to it in front of the nurses'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within seven days after the comprehensive MDS assessment was completed for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to complete a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #1's needs within seven days after the comprehensive MDS assessment was completed. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual care needs met in a timely manner or diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 06/12/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Intertrochanteric Fracture of Right Femur (type of hip fracture in which the femur is fractured), Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Ovary (primary or metastatic malignant tumor involving the ovary), and Chronic Kidney Disease (long-term condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 3 of 9 residents (Resident #21, Resident #31, and Resident # 41) reviewed for call lights in that: Resident #21's, and Resident #31's call lights were on the floor and Resident #41's call light was in drawer and not in reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 08/17/2023, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure (leads to serious and life-threatening complications), altered mental status ( a change in mental function that stems from illnesses, disorders and injuries affecting your brain), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation , interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy of his or her personal male and right to send and promptly receive unopened mail and other letters, packages, materials delivery to the facility for residents for one of one facility. The facility failed to implemet a system for delivering mail received on Saturdays to residents the date of receipt and instead of distributed mail received Saturday on Mondays. This failure could place the residents in facility at risk of not receiving mail in a prompt manner and could result in a decline in the residents' psychosocial well-being and cause them to feel disconnected from family, friends, and current events. Findings included: In a group confidential interview on 08/16/2023 at 2:40 PM, all eight resident attendees stated they do not receive mail on Saturdays at the facility because there was no one in the office on Saturdays. Residents stated that mail was provided to them by the AD Monday through Friday. In an interview on 08/18/2023 at 9:23 AM, the AD stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four of fifteen residents (Resident # 21, Resident #18, Resident #31 and Resident #13) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident#21s, Resident #18's, Resident #31's, and Resident #13's fingernails were trimmed and cleaned. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 08/17/2023, reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body, whereas hemiparesis was characterized by one-sided weakness, but without complete paralysis), altered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that menus were developed and followed to meet resident nutritional, religious, cultural, or ethnic needs, and resident choices in accordance with the national guidelines for one of one facility. The facility failed to provide residents in the facility with a varied menu, having utilized the same menu for the facility for over a year. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk of reduced appetite resulting in their nutritional needs not being met and / or weight loss. Findings included: Observation on 08/16/2023 at 9:01 AM, revealed the menu board outside the dining area contained no information as to kitchen menus for the day, week, or month. In a confidential group interview on 08/16/2023 at 2:40 PM, all eight resident attendees stated they were tired of the same menu being served in the facility every week. Residents stated that they were given a copy of the menu and that one has not been posted outside the dining area for over a year. Residents stated they were told they would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for three of fifteen residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #20, #22, and #30) A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a revision of decline in cognitive abilities that impact a person's ability to do everyday activities. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a revision of Resident #22 had shortness of breath. C) The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a revision of his plan of care to reflect Resident #30's current skin condition. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met in a timely manner and communicated to providers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 Residents (Resident #20 and #29) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #29's suction equipment was properly cleaned and dated. 1. Failed to date suction tubing and canister. 2. Failed to bag yaunker. 3. Failed to clean suction tubing. The facility failed to replace Resident #20's oxygen tubing. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory compromise and infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #29's Face Sheet dated 08/17/2023 revealed that he was a [AGE] year old male, with an initial admit date of 10/15/2018 and secondary admission date of 10/20/2022. His diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it. A lack of adequate blood supply to brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure storage of medications used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate expiration dates 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. -The facility failed to date a multi-use product (eye drops) when the product was first opened according to manufacture and professional standards. -The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication carts. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medications or a contaminated medication. Findings Included: Observation on 08/16/2023 at 2:31 PM revealed the facility Unit 2 Medication cart with a bottle of Ferrous Gluconate 324mg capsules with the expiration date of 06/30/2023. Observation on 08/16/2023 at 2:45 PM revealed the Unit 2 LVN medication cart with a bottle of Refresh eye drops and a bottle of Systane eye drops without open dates. In an interview on 08/16/2023 at 2:47 PM, LVN A stated the bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,036 — penalty dated 2025-08-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX 1 of 5Brightpointe at Lytle LakeAbilene, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BURLESON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/15/2014
CHAPMAN, WAYNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/15/2014
1022 PRESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR E OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
JIAN, PETERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2024
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2026
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2026
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2026
1022 PRESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR E PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
HOYLE, LINDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 5%Other / private 40%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$214per resident / day
operating cost
$6,494per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$191per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675885. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next