No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Giddings

1400 N Main St, Giddings, TX 78942 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (979) 542-1755 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$39,701 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $39,701 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
219 W Railroad Row · (979) 542-9000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
233 S Manse Ave · (979) 542-3164 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
513 E Austin St · (979) 542-7425 · Call to confirm hours
Park
730 W Independence St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
697 W Boundary St · (979) 542-3498

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.4%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.132.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.622.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.2%CMS range 35.2–75.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 8.0–18.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
30.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 61.0 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as is possible, by not providing adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #1, who has frequent falls and severe cognitive impairment, and was allowed to wander outside with no supervision near a busy highway with a speed limit of 45 mph and through restricted construction areas with uneven pavement.This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 11/26/2025. While the IJ was removed on 11/27/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm with an isolated scope and severity. 2. The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff responded to an unwitnessed fall for Resident #1, and when notified by staff member dismissed the fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who was an elopement risk, was not left outside in the secure unit courtyard by himself on 08/13/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 08/13/24 and ended on 08/18/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications and meals, going missing, or sustaining injuries, dehydration, or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/25/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a group of diseases that cause a loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life), anxiety disorder, and unspecified mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to residents received food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 of 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #56) residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility failed to ensure CK K prepared pureed meat for Resident #7 and Resident #56. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager checked the service line for correct consistencies for Resident #7 and Resident #56. The facility failed to ensure CK J did not serve ground meat in place of pureed meat to Resident #7 and Resident #56. The facility failed to ensure DA L checked diet texture against therapeutic orders for Resident #7 and Resident #56. The facility failed to ensure LVN D thoroughly checked Resident #7 and Resident #56's trays for texture-modified diet. The facility failed to ensure CNA F did not feed the wrong texture to Resident #7. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 1/17/2024 at 5:13 p.m. While the immediacy was removed on 1/19/2024 at 11:28 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at S483.10(c)(2) and S483.10(c)(3), that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #01) whose comprehensive person-centered care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #01 was receiving larger portions at lunch and dinner meals. This deficient practice could affect residents by failing to ensure residents received appropriate care for their health conditions.The findings included:An observation of Resident #1's lunch on 05/20/2026 at 12:26 pm revealed a plate of food with 1 chopped beef sandwich, 1 serving of beans, 1 serving of corn, and 1 dessert. Surveyor compared Resident #1's meal ticket with Resident #2's meal ticket. Both tickets had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #17, Resident #52 and Resident # 58) reviewed for care plans.1. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident # 17 and Resident #52's care plan to reflect Activity Plans and Interventions.2.The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #52's care plan to reflect ADLs and Activity Plans and interventions.3. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #58 care plan to reflect ADLs.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met to attain their highest practicable well-being.Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 04/22/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included senile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for three of eight residents (Resident # 17, Resident #52 and Resident #58) reviewed for ADL care.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's facial hair was removed on 04/21/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52 and Resident #58's nails were cleaned on 04/21/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 04/22/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified ( a progressive decline of memory loss and confusion associated with aging but it is not caused by specific diseases like Alzheimer's- irreversible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 3 (Resident #17, Resident #52 and Resident #58) of 8 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #17, Resident #52 and Resident #58 to meet their psycho-social and mental needs for the entire month of March and April of 2026. This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function. Findings include: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 04/22/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included senile degeneration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure drugs used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 (Resident #36) out of 8 residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to update Resident #36's medication label for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg tablet to reflect a change in the frequency of the administration of the medication. This failure could have placed residents at risk for a medication error such as not receiving adequate pain medication as ordered by the physician.Findings include: Review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 04/23/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: encephalopathy (brain dysfunction, damage, or disease); cerebellar stroke syndrome (a serious neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager and Dietary Aide G used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included: Observation on 04/22/2026 at 8:15 am the Dietary Manager was wearing gloves in the kitchen. She was serving breakfast from the steam table. She picked up a red crate (used all fingers on both hands) stored near the steam table and moved it to a different area in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager returned to the steam table and did not change her gloves. Her thumb and forefinger on her right hand touched inside a divided plate and placed food on the area where she had touched inside the plate. She exited the steam table area of the kitchen and entered the back of the kitchen to obtain a pitcher. When she placed her hands on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 2 residents (Resident #10, and Resident #24) of 8 residents observed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure RN J followed the hand hygiene policy procedures during wound care on 04/22/2026 for Resident #10 and Resident #24. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare-associated cross-contamination and infections.Findings included: Review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 04/21/2026 revealed he is a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body develops insulin resistance, which is a condition where body cells fail to respond…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity and care for 1 of 4 residents ( Resident #10) observed for resident rights. RN J failed to ensure Resident # 10's privacy curtain was used or the door to his room was closed when RN J was repositioning Resident #10 in bed and did not ensure his buttocks was not exposed. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling embarrassed and diminish the resident's quality of life. Findings included:Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 04/21/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression ( a common but serious mental health condition characterized by a persistent feeling of sadness), anxiety disorder ( a group of treatable mental health conditions characterized by excessive , persistent, and uncontrollable fear, worry, or dread that interferes with daily activities), and pressure ulcer of sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for one of two housekeeping carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) reviewed for hazards.The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Cart #1, with chemicals inside the compartments, was locked when unsupervised. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included:Observation on 04/21/2026 at 9:30 am revealed Housekeeping Cart #1 was located in the dining room. The compartment where chemicals were stored was not locked. The compartment had glass cleaner, disinfectant cleaner, tub and tile cleaner, and bio waste degrader. Housekeeper H was not standing near the housekeeping cart, and no other staff was near the unlocked housekeeping cart. Housekeeper H was behind the wall in the dining room and was unable to view the housekeeping cart.During an interview on 04/21/2026 at 9:35 a.m., Housekeeper H stated the housekeeping cart was expected to be locked anytime housekeeper walked away from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia received the necessary care and services to support the highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dementia care. The facility did not identify, document, or implement individualized person-centered interventions that were cognitively appropriate for Resident #2. There was no evidence that care planning addressed the resident's specific preferences, abilities, or need for engagement. This failure resulted in lack of dementia-focused care and placed the resident with dementia at risk for increased behavioral symptoms, boredom, and a decreased quality of life.Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 04/21/2026 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility initially on 07/17/2025 and last admitted to facility on 03/06/2026 with multiple diagnosis to include hyperosmolality and hypernatremia (large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff responded to an unwitnessed fall for Resident #1, and when notified by staff member dismissed the fall as a behavior. The fall was not documented by staff, reported to the DON, physician, or resident representative (RP). This failure could place residents at risk for delays in care that could lead to worsening of a serious injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Facesheet dated 11/25/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Repeated falls, Impulse disorder, Cerebral Infarction, muscle weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, bipolar disorder, and chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all routine and emergency drugs and biologicals for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Tylenol-codeine 3 were acquired and administered according to physician's orders. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a potential for decreased health status and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of fats in the artery walls), unspecified dementia (symptoms that negatively affect memory, thinking, and social abilities), pain, other recurrent depressive disorders (repeated periods of significant sadness, loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 7 (Resident #6, #49, and #203) residents reviewed for accommodations. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #6, #49, and #203 had their call lights within reach while lying in bed. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, for not receiving timely care, and for not receiving nursing interventions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/26/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a condition in which the blood flow to the brain is cut off causing brain damage), hemiplegia (the complete paralysis on one side of the body), and cognitive communication deficit (a condition that affects the ability to communicate effectively). Record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 2 of 3 shower rooms (shower rooms A and B), 2 of 24 resident rooms (Residents #18 and 35), and in 2 halls and 1 common area (halls 100 and 600 and the rotunda) reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure shower rooms A and B were clean from 02/24/25 to 02/26/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure the rooms for Residents #18 and 35 were clean from 02/24/25 to 02/26/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure the 100 and 600 halls and the rotunda were free of unpleasant odors from 02/24/25 to 02/26/25. These failures placed residents at risk of discomfort and diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/24/25 at 10:03 AM revealed shower room A (entrance on the 100 hall) had a first aid bandage, hair, and a disposable glove on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of each resident: specifically, expired or opened medical supplies were stored in 1 of 2 (100/200-hall Nurses' medication cart) medication carts. The facility failed to ensure expired or open supplies were removed from the 100/200-hall Nurses' medication cart that included one 5 x 9 Xeroform dressing that expired 01/2025, one sterile cotton tipped applicator that expired 08/01/2024, five 4 x 4 drain sponges that expired 12/05/2024, one 2 x 2 hydrogel saturated dressing that expired 11/15/2024, one 1 x 8 Xeroform dressing that expired 03/2024, three 6 x 7 Silicone Composite Dressings that expired 02/22/2025, and one opened package of rolled gauze bandage. These failures could place residents at risk of contamination causing illness or decreased effectiveness of medication. Findings included: Observation on 02/26/2025 at 11:50 AM of the 100/200 hall Nurses' medication cart with LVN E in attendance revealed one 5 x 9 Xeroform dressing that expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure fruit cobbler was covered, dated, or labeled after being in the refrigerator. 2. The facility failed to ensure CK K did not store her shoes on the kitchen utility cart in the kitchen. 3. The facility failed to ensure CK J properly used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/24/2025 at 9:05 AM in the open front refrigerator located across from the steam table reflected a large pan of fruit cobbler not labeled, covered, or dated. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 02/24/2025 at 9:14 AM stated the fruit cobbler was made on Sunday (02/23/2025) to be served for lunch on 02/24/2025. She stated the fruit cobbler was expected to be covered, labeled, and dated. The Dietary Manager stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property, and dementia management and resident abuse prevention to their staff for 4 of 8 staff (RN A, CNA N, CNA O, and CNA P) reviewed for staff training requirements. The facility failed to provide RN A, CNA N, CNA O, and CNA P with orientation, as required by their abuse/neglect prevention policy and procedure prior to scheduling them to work with residents. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse and neglect. Findings included: Review of the personnel file for RN A reflected a hire date of 02/15/24. Her personnel file did not include documentation of the required orientation. Review of the personnel file for CNA N reflected a hire date of 06/24/24. His personnel file did not include documentation of the required orientation. Review of the personnel file for CNA O reflected a hire date of 01/17/23. Her personnel file…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 24 residents (Residents #35 and 104) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to include Resident #35's behaviors of urinating in places other than the toilet in his care plan. The facility failed to include Resident #104's bilateral heel injuries in her care plan. These failures placed residents at risk of not having their care needs met. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #35 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances and anxiety disorder. Review of the annual MDS for Resident #35 dated 12/19/24 reflected a BIMS score of 03, indicating severely impaired cognition. It reflected he required supervision or touching assistance with toileting hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #35 dated 01/23/25 reflected the following: [Resident #35]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #45 and 104) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to follow up with treatment of a skin tear from a fall for Resident #45 after readmission from the hospital. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #104 had compression hose applied to both legs from 02/24/25 to 02/26/25 as ordered. These failures places residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, worsened swelling, infection, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 02/26/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cellulitis of left upper limb (an infection in the skin tissue), muscle weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, and other fracture of shaft of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure a functional emergency call light system in the bathroom for 1 of 5 (Resident # 38) residents reviewed for communication systems. The facility failed to ensure the emergency call light in the bathroom was functional for Resident #38. This failure could place the residents at risk of falls causing injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #38's face sheet, dated 02/26/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects how the body uses sugar as a fuel), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, chest pain, hypertension (high blood pressure), bipolar disorder (a chronic mood disorder that causes intense shifts in mood, energy levels and behavior), and atherosclerotic heart disease (condition that occurs when plaque builds up in the arteries, hardening them and limiting blood flow to the heart). Record review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction for residents residing on secure unit, 100 hall, 500 hall and 600 hall. 1. The facility failed to provide activities on secure unit for the month of January 2025. 2. The facility failed to provide activities on 100, 500 and 600 halls 25 days out of 31 days for the month of January 2025, and 13 out of 20 days for the month of February 2025. This failure placed residents at risk for boredom, depression, increased behaviors, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the January 2025 Activity Calendar for the secure unit reflected it was the same calendar for residents not residing on the secure unit. Review of the secure unit group activity participation binder on 02/20/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident # 1, and Resident #2) reviewed ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 nails were cleaned, trimmed, and did not have any rough edges. This failure could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated, 02/20/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes without complications ( when your body can not use insulin properly or does not make enough insulin) unspecified lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets daily nutritional and special dietary needs for one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for needs and preferences. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received a diabetic diet as listed on his meal ticket and ordered by the physician. This failure placed residents at risk for altered nutritional status and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 02/20/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes without complications ( when your body can not use insulin properly or does not make enough insulin) unspecified lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), unspecified dementia, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurate for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff documented if the medical physician, nurse practitioner or family was contacted after Resident #3 fell on [DATE]. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the proper care and having medical records that are not current/accurate Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 02/20/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included unspecified lack of coordination ( uncoordinated movement is due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), unspecified fracture of right pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing (part of the hip bone located on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for fall mats. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a fall mat in place beside his bed per his care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of falls, injuries, pain, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of traumatic Subdural Hematoma (when blood leaks between the skull and the surface of the brain after a head injury) without loss of consciousness, Muscle weakness generalized, unspecified lack of coordination, and Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 7 of 7 residents (Residents #1- #7) and 4 of 6 halls (100, 200 secure unit, 500, and 600 halls) reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the rooms for Residents #1- #7 and the 600-hallway area were clean and in good repair on 04/23/2024. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 04/23/24 at 10:18 AM revealed a large light brown stain of pooled and dried liquid on the ceiling tiles of the 600 hall and a coating of black dust collecting in a large area around the air conditioner vent nearby. Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, age-related cataract (clouding of the lens of the eye), and cognitive communication deficit (problems communicating caused by impaired cognition).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect in that: CNA A yelled (verbal abuse) at Resident #1, and refused to make up her bed so she could lie down on 04/12/23. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The non-compliance began on 4/12/23 and ended on 4/13/23. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure (of verbal abuse) could place residents at risk of physical or emotional distress, and injury. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #1 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Atrial Fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, Hypothyroidism, Seizures, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, major depressive disorder and Dementia with unspecified behavior disturbance. Review of the MDS significant change assessment for Resident #1 dated 11/13/23 reflected a BIMS score of 03…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 3 (Resident #78, Resident #54, and Resident #96) of 7 residents reviewed for safe, clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment in that: A. Resident #78's room had a section of the textured ceiling hanging down from water damage, had a window that would not properly seal allowing air in, and had a toilet with streaks and spots of a dried brown substance around the bowl and down the pedestal portion of the toilet. B. Resident #54's room toilet had a brownish yellow stain with debris in it that ran down the toilet from the bowl to the bottom of the pedestal. Resident #54's toilet was not properly secured to the floor, which allowed the base of the bowl to move some from side to side. C. Resident #96's room had two areas of paint missing from the wall to the side of his bed, which were visible to him and visitors. These failures could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to ensure all items were labeled, dated and discarded prior to its use-by date. The facility failed to ensure DA M washed her hands with warm water. The facility failed to ensure CK J manually washed dishes in water that was at least 120°F. The facility failed to ensure bread was not stored directly under an opened ceiling. The facility failed to ensure the food preparation sink in the dining room was clean and free of debris. These failures placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: An observation of the kitchen's handwashing sink on 1/17/2024 at 9:20 a.m. revealed there was no warm or hot water . During an interview on 1/17/2024 at 9:21 a.m., CK J stated the pipe had been busted since yesterday (1/16/2024). CK K stated there was not hot water due to the broken pipe. CK J stated a plumber had come by the day prior (1/16/2024),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in under proper temperature controls in accordance with state and federal laws for one of one medication room. The facility failed to ensure the medications in the medication room were stored under proper temperature controls. This failure could place residents at increased risk of receiving medications that have been degraded by temperature changes and no longer provide a therapeutic effect resulting in adverse health consequences. Findings include: In an interview on 01/18/2024 at 10:01 AM LVN A stated the med room was hot. She stated they told her the air heater on the unit went in there. She stated she was in there the other day, and it did not take long for her to start sweating. LVN A stated the medication room had been really hot the last two days she worked 01/17/2024 and 01/18/2024. In an observation and interview on 01/18/2024 at 10:16 AM revealed the facility's one medication storage room, ) with door to the medication room open (room door is always closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to receive written notice of a room change before the change was made for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48, received verbal or written notice prior to a room change. This failure could place residents at risk for being displaced without notice and/or reason in order to accommodate other individuals. Findings included: Review of Resident #48 Face sheet dated 01/19/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Cerebral Infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain. It is caused by disrupted blood supply (ischemia) and restricted oxygen supply (hypoxia).), Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.) and Hypertension (High pressure in the arteries (vessels that carry blood from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 8 (Resident #46) residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's used bandage did not remain on his windowsill. This failure placed resident at risk of an unsafe, unclean, and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: A record review of Resident #46's face sheet dated 1/19/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (end-stage heart disease), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified dementia, and muscle weakness. A record review of Resident #46's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 8, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. A record review of Resident #46's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, based on a comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities for group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #50 and Resident #32), reviewed for activity preferences, in that: 1. The facility failed to provide individualized, person-centered activities to Resident #50. 2. The facility failed to provide individualized, person-centered activities to Resident #32. These failures could affect residents' psychosocial well-being and could lead to a diminished quality of life. The finding included: 1. A record review of Resident #50's face sheet dated 1/18/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Huntington's disease (inherited disease causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow menus for 2 of 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #56) residents reviewed for menu accuracy. The facility failed to provide Resident #7 and Resident #56 pureed meat. The facility prepared pureed sandwich bread instead of cornbread for Resident #7 and Resident #56. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving items on the menu and weight loss. Findings included: A record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 1/19/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (cognitive impairment), muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle loss), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), nausea with vomiting, essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and vitamin B12 deficiency anemias. A record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severely impaired cognition. This care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 7 (Resident #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ,7) of 9 residents' rooms observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure the A/C vents of Residents # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were cleaned, maintained and free from dust and a black-like substance. The facility failed to ensure the windowsills of Residents # 3 and 5 were replaced appropriately. The facility failed to ensure that the tile on Resident #1's floor was replaced. The facility failed to ensure that the damaged wall on Resident #7's room was repaired and painted. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/30/23 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication storage. There was a Tylenol 650 mg on the floor under Resident #1's bed. This failure placed residents at risk of accidental ingestion of medication and not receiving therapeutic benefit of medications. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, iron deficiency anemia, hypokalemia (low blood potassium), history of falling, gastroesophageal reflux disease (acid indigestion affecting the esophagus), anxiety disorder, chronic pain, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, and schizophrenia (psychotic disorder causing hallucinations and paranoia). Review of the quarterly MDS for Resident #1 dated 05/11/23 reflected a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$39,701 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $10,535 — penalty dated 2025-11-27
  • $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-09-26
  • $21,145 — penalty dated 2023-12-30
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-17 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX 1 of 5Brightpointe at Lytle LakeAbilene, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MURRELL, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2021
1400 N MAIN ST OPCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
AGYEMANG-BARIMAH, RITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
MCBROOM, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
1400 N MAIN ST PROPERTY OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 6%Other / private 35%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$219per resident / day
operating cost
$6,656per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$215per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675101. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next