Avir at Gainesville
1900 O'Neal St., Gainesville, TX 76240 · Government - Hospital district · 112 certified beds · (940) 665-2826 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $99,075 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-06)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.9% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.5% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.1% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.5% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.51 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.14 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.6–18.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.64 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 60.1 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect for one (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for resident neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from neglect by RN A on 05/31/25. RN A failed to perform an assessment on 05/31/25 when Resident #1 reported he needed to go to the hospital complaining of leg pain. RN A failed to notify and follow-up to ensure Resident #1 was sent to the hospital. RN A failed to notify the physician or any licensed nurse of Resident #1 requesting to go to the hospital. RN A called 911 to report Resident #1's behavior, but RN A failed to report Resident #1 wanted to go to the hospital on [DATE]. When police arrived at the facility on 05/31/25, RN A did not notify the police of Resident #1 wanting to go to the hospital or assist in sending Resident #1 to the hospital. The local police called EMS and Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room. Resident #1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for one, (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for resident neglect. The facility failed to report a potential allegation of neglect to the Abuse Coordinator when RN A failed to provide care and treatment for Resident # 1, who was in her care assignment. LVN B and CNA C were aware that RN A did not provide care to Resident #1. RN A was allowed to work on 05/31/25 to 06/02/25 after she failed to provide care and treatment when Resident # 1 requested to go the hospital on [DATE]. Police notified EMS of Resident #1's request to go to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Residents #1) of six residents reviewed for pain management. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was assessed, monitored and received effective pain management by LVN A after Resident #1 was found on the floor with indications of pain when mumbling and grumbling during transfer at time of unwitnessed fall on 02/24/24 at 12:17 AM. Resident #1 received no pain management from LVN A. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received pain medication until after a 9 hour delay after the an unwitnessed fall. Resident #1 exhibited increasing signs of pain indicated by facial grimacing, moaning and holding her left hip. LVN B failed to follow Resident #1's prn physician order of administering Tylenol 500 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-22 · tag F0776 — patternProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide radiology or other diagnostic services to meet the needs of its residents in a timely manner for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for radiology services. 1. The facility failed to ensure that a stat x-ray was completed in a timely manner for Resident #1 on 02/24/24. 2. The facility failed to follow up to get Resident #1's stat x-ray results in a timely manner on 02/24/24. Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall on 02/24/24 at 12:17 AM and sustained an injury. LVN A failed to ensure x-ray physician order was placed stat and not routine 12 hours after the unwitnessed fall, X-ray tech was at facility to complete stat x-ray for Resident #1. 17 hours after unwitnessed incident, Resident was sent to hospital for increasing pain and x-ray results had not been received. As a result, Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital (19 hour delay) since pain onset and unwitnessed fall for a left displaced hip fracture and had surgery to repair the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for two of seven (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's and Resident #2's shower was in good working order and did not have broken tile, caved in wall and running water on 06/10/26. These failures placed residents at risk of resident restroom in an unsafe environment and a lack of a functional shower.Findings included:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 05/14/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old, male admitted [DATE]. Resident #1's BIMS was 11 which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. He required supervision assistance with ADLs including showers. Diagnoses included Malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the brain and lungs, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (restrictive air flow and breathing difficulties) and long-term use of anticoagulants (blood thinners).Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for resident rights: The facility failed to provide clean bed linens for Resident #1 and Resident #2's bed on 2/17/26. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases and other unsanitary health hazards.Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 2/17/26 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 5/31/25 and a readmission date of 9/28/25. Resident #3 had the following active diagnoses: muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease size, mass and strength of muscle tissue), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and Depression (a medical illness characterized by a persistent, intense, and long-lasting low mood, loss of interest and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments to reflect the current condition for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was complete and reflected his need for a therapeutic diet. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan was complete and reflected her need for a therapeutic diet. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/17/26 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 1/9/26. Resident #1 had the following active diagnoses: muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease size, mass and strength of muscle tissue), Hypothyroidism (endocrine disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assist residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to groom Resident #3's facial hair on 2/17/26.The facility failed to assist Resident #3 with showers on 2/3/26 and 2/14/26. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases, and affect their dignity.Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 2/17/26 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 5/31/25 and a readmission date of 9/28/25. Resident #3 had the following active diagnoses: muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease size, mass and strength of muscle tissue), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and Depression (a medical illness characterized by a persistent, intense, and long-lasting low mood, loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed therapeutic diets: The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with food that was consistent with his prescribed fortified food plan diet on 2/17/26.The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with food that was consistent with her prescribed Low Concentrated Sugar diet on 2/9/26 and 2/10/26. These failures could place residents at risk of declining health and significant fluctuations with their weight.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/17/26 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 1/9/26. Resident #1 had the following active diagnoses: muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease size, mass and strength of muscle tissue), Hypothyroidism (endocrine disorder where the thyroid fails to produce sufficient thyroid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for two of 10 residents (Resident #18 and Resident #59) and four of 4 shared bathrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 304, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 308, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 309, and room [ROOM NUMBER] and 312) reviewed for homelike environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's restroom tile around the toilet was in good working condition on 12/09/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's restroom toilet was working properly, and fan blower wires were not exposed in bathroom ceiling on 12/09/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure the restroom handrails were in good repair for bathrooms shared by room [ROOM NUMBER] and 304, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 308, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 309, and room [ROOM NUMBER] and 312. These failures placed residents at risk of resident restroom in an unsafe environment and a lack of homelike environment for residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to send a copy of the residents' discharge notice, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the residents' transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for the discharge process. Resident #24 was discharged on 10/15/2025, 11/08/2025 and 11/26/2025 without a notice to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This failure could place residents at risk of not knowing their rights or receiving the services of the state Long-Term Care Ombudsman.The findings included:A record review of Resident #24's face sheet printed 12/11/2025 revealed diagnoses of Unspecified Fracture of Lower End of Right Humerus (a break near the elbow, causing pain, swelling, bruising, and stiffness), Calculus of Kidney (known as a kidney stones), Shortness of Breath, Obesity, Acute Kidney Failure, and Type 2 Diabetes.A record review of Resident #24's MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #19, and Resident #24) of ten residents reviewed for respiratory care.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen tubing (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was stored properly when not in use on 12/09/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen tubing was stored properly when not in use on 12/09/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's suction tubing (used to keep the airway clear) was stored properly when not in use on 12/10/2025.4. The facility failed to ensure Resident 24's oxygen tubing and CPAP (machine delivers continuous stream of air to keep airway open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure fryer was free of sediments and failed to ensure oil had been replaced. 2. Dietary [NAME] I and Dietary Aide J failed to ensure hair was covered or properly restrained during lunch meal service on 12/11/25. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and contamination Findings included: 1. Observation on 12/09/25 at 10:43 AM revealed fryer revealed about 2 inches sediment around the edges of the fryer and food particles in dark brown oil. Interview on 12/09/25 at 10:45 AM with Dietary Manager revealed the fryer was last used on Friday (12/05/25) and the oil is supposed to be changed weekly on Friday. She stated it was not changed last Friday (12/05/25) since she was out of oil to replace it. She stated her shipment was coming and will be changed once she got the oil. 2. Observation on 12/11/25 at 11:58 AM revealed Dietary [NAME] I was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for one (Resident #24) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident 24's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected the use of oxygen therapy on 12/10/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed.Findings included:Record review of Resident #24's Face Sheet, dated 12/10/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #24 had diagnoses which included mild persistent asthma (causes the airway to narrow and can make breathing difficult) and pneumonia (infection in lung).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurate and complete in accordance with acceptable professional standards for 2 (Residents #23 and #24) of 4 residents reviewed for clinical records.1. Resident #23 had an OOH-DNR in their record that was missing information in Section B, Declaration by legal guardian, agent, or proxy on behalf of the adult person who is incompetent or otherwise incapable of communication.2. Resident #35 had an OOH-DNR in their record that the family member signed in sections they were not supposed to, the family member missed a required signature at the bottom, and the two witnesses to the family members signature did not sign until 14 days after the family member did.The facility's failure could place residents at risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives' wishes. Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #23's face sheet printed [DATE] revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who is responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the resident and to ensure facility obtained documentation from hospice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for hospice care. 1. The facility failed to ensure there was a designated member of the interdisciplinary team for hospice coordination of care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's hospice election form and physician recertification of terminal illness for Resident #59 was available. These failures place residents at risk of lack of coordination of care and decrease in quality of care. Record Review of Resident #59's admission assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hip fracture, dementia (significant cognitive decline severe enough to disrupt daily life) and polyneuropathy (condition affecting multiple peripheral nerves in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #11) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA G performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during Resident #11's incontinent care on 12/10/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings include:Review of Resident #11's Face Sheet, dated 12/11/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life) and diabetes mellitus (the body does not use insulin properly which leads to elevated blood glucose levels).Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident had a right to a dignified existence and self-determination that promotes enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for one of eight residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's right to go to the hospital on [DATE] was followed by RN A. Police had to contact EMS for Resident #1 requesting to go to the hospital for a possible blood clot. The failure could place residents at risk of a loss of self-determination and dignity. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet undated reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital. Resident #1 had diagnoses of acute embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein (presence of a blood clot in the femoral vein of the right leg), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), acute embolism and thrombosis of right lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the physical status for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for notification of changes. RN A failed to notify the physician of Resident #1 being sent to the hospital on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for not notifying the physician for a change in condition and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet undated reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital. Resident #1 had diagnoses of acute embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein (presence of a blood clot in the femoral vein of the right leg), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), acute embolism and thrombosis of right lower extremity bilateral (presence of blood clots in the deep veins in both legs), chronic pulmonary edema (the buildup of fluid in your lungs), peripheral vascular disease (condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen for 2 of 2 Dietary Staff (Dietary Aide J and Dietary Aide K) reviewed for kitchen sanitation. Dietary Aide J and K failed to wear effective hair restraints and to perform hand hygiene during lunch meal service on 09/10/24. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation on 09/10/24 from 12:03 pm to 12:06 PM with Dietary Aide J revealed she was taking puréed food temps on the steam table with her hair restraint not covering about 1.5 inches on the back of her hair and about 1 inch uncovered above both of her ears. Observations on 09/10/24 at 12:07 PM revealed Dietary Aide J started putting food on the plate for resident lunch. Observation revealed Dietary Aide J was wearing a hair restraint not covering about 1.5 inches on the back of her hair and about 1 inch uncovered above both of her ears.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain an orderly and comfortable homelike environment for 3 (Resident #9, #19, and #45) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the shared bathroom sink for Resident #9, Resident #19, and Resident #45 was in working order. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and living in an unsanitary and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/19/2024, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that limits airflow), dementia (loss of cognition) Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that causes uncontrollable movements), and stroke. Record review of Resident #19's care plan initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 6 of 24 (Residents #7, #28, #39, #43, #46, #50) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #50. The comprehensive care plans failed to adress the specific psychotropic medications ordered by the physician, specific required ADL assistance and comfort measures and discharge goals. 2. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #43 and #46's significant weight loss. The facility failed to develop ADL assistance comprehensive person-centered care plans for Resident #43 and #46. 3. The facility failed to include in the care plan last revised on 08/28/24 Resident #39's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three (Resident #13, #26 and #36) of 7 residents reviewed for activities. 1. The facility failed to provide individualized and group activities for Resident #13 on the secure unit who did not consistently attend group activities off the secure unit. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 had an individualized activity care plan. 2. The facility failed to provide individualized and group activities for Resident #26 on the secure unit who did not attend the group activities off the secure unit. The facility failed to follow Resident #26's individualized activity care plan. 3. The facility failed to provide individualized activities for Resident #36 on the secure unit who did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 4 (Resident #25, Resident #28, Resident #37, and Resident #253) of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to obtain a Physician's order for Resident #37's continuous supplemental oxygen. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's nasal cannula, oxygen tubing and humidifier were changed out on 09/08/24 per physician orders. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 28's humidifier was changed out when empty on 09/10/2024 per physician orders. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 253 humidifier was changed out when empty on 09/10/2024 per physician orders. These failures could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of oxygen toxicity, respiratory infections, nose bleeds, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to provide RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily on Saturdays and Sundays in June, July, and August 2024. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN-specific nursing activities. Findings include: Record Review of RN timesheets for June to September 2024 for facility and Agency staff revealed no RN coverage for the following weekends: 06/01/24 - 06/02/24, 06/08/24 - 06/09/24, 06/15/24 - 06/16/24, 06/22/24 - 06/23/24, 06/29/24 - 06/30/24, 07/13/24 - 07/14/24, 07/20/24 - 07/21/24, 08/03/24 - 08/04/24, 08/10/24 - 08/11/24 and 08/24/24 - 08/25/24. Interview on 09/12/24 at 2:08 PM with ADON revealed she was contacted on the weekends when facility did not have RN coverage on the weekends. She stated she would notify the DON if she needed further assistance. Interview on 09/12/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self- determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to promote Resident #50's self-determination by not offering her an opportunity to smoke when smoke breaks occurred at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased self-worth due to their preferences not being met. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's face sheet undated reflected Resident #50 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease and seizures. Review of Resident #50's admission MDS assessment date 08/27/24 reflected Resident #50 had a BIMS of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #50's comprehensive care plan last revised on 08/23/24 reflected Resident #50 had the Potential for safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure a new resident was not admitted with a mental disorder, unless the state mental health authority determined, based on an independent physical and mental evaluation performed by a person or entity other than the State mental health authority prior to admission, that the individual requires the level of services provided by a nursing facility and if the resident requires such level of services, whether the resident requires specialized services for one (Resident #9) of six residents reviewed for PASARR screening. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 received a PASARR level 2 evaluation. This failure could affect residents with mental illness and place them at risk of not being assessed to receive needed services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 08/02/2024, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She had a BIMS score of 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans were prepared by an IDT that included the attending physician, a registered nurse and a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident, a member of food and nutrition services staff and the participation of the resident for one of 8 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for care plan conference. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 had a care plan conference to discuss her treatment and discharge goals. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving adequate or individualized care. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's face sheet undated reflected Resident #50 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease and seizures. Review of Resident #50's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #50 had a BIMS of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact. Resident #50 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one of thirteen residents (Resident # 18) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 had her facial hair removed and her nails cut. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at a loss of dignity and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #18's annual MDS assessment, dated 06/20/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 07/01/22 and a re-admission date of 03/13/24. Resident #18 had BIMS score of 3 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. She required moderate assistance for bathing and personal hygiene. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's and osteoarthritis (chronic condition that breaks down the cartilage in the joints, causing pain and stiffness). Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 (Resident #7) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to follow physician orders and perform wound treatments as ordered for Resident #7. 1. The ADON failed to discontinue the previous physician order from a xeroform dressing for Resident #7's surgical incision to the updated order for a wet to dry dressing on 07/01/2024. 2. Agency LVN D failed to notify the ADON, DON, or Physician of the conflicting orders and provided a xeroform and wet to dry dressing of Resident #7's incision site on 09/10/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for complications including skin break down, infection, or decreased physical and mental functioning. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one of one resident (Resident #4) reviewed for feeding tubes. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A flushed Resident #4's G-Tube with 30 cc of water prior to the medication administration per physician's orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A dissolved all the medications prior to administration through Resident #4's G-Tube. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered medications through Resident #4's G-Tube by gravity, and instead she pushed one of the medications with the plunger and syringe. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN A clamped the tubing before it drained completely between each medication administration. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of abdominal discomfort, obstruction of the G-tube and incomplete medication administrations. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Significant change MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of thirteen residents (Resident #32, Resident #7, and Resident #4) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #32, Resident #7, and Resident #4) on 09/11/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A performed hand hygiene during medication administration and did not cross contaminate the medication for Resident #32 and Resident #7 on 09/11/24. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not cross contaminate Resident #32's eye drops, allergy nasal spray and antifungal powder during medication pass on 09/11/24. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination which could result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) reviewed for grievances. The facility did not ensure grievances from 06/01/2024 to 08/27/2024 were completed for Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, who were not comfortable in their rooms due to lack of proper air conditioning (room temperatures). This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Grievance log from 06/01/2024 to 08/27/2024 reflected no grievances related to air condition/room temperatures were recorded. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/21/2024 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included: Acute upper respiratory infection (infection that can affect the nose, throat, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the failed to implement their written abuse prevention policy and investigate allegations for two residents (Residents #1 and #8) of eight residents reviewed for resident abuse and one (LVN B) of three staff files reviewed for employee files. 1. The Administrator failed to follow facility policy when Resident #1 had an injury of unknown origin resulting in serious injury by not reporting the injury within the required timeframe. 2. CNA H failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator or DON related to Resident #8. 3. Facility failed to ensure LVN B's Criminal Background Check and EMR/NAR check were completed upon hire and in her employee file. These failures places residents at risk of abuse along with allegations of abuse identified and investigated thoroughly. Findings included: Record Review of facility's policy for staff reporting abuse allegations dated 2001 and revised January 2011 titled Policy for Reporting Abuse to Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours to HHSC for abuse allegations for two residents (Residents #1, #8 and) of 8 residents reviewed for reporting resident abuse. 1. The Administrator failed to report Resident #1's fall with serious injury within 2 hours to HHSC. 2. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving Resident #8 to the appropriate State Agency immediately on 09/25/2023. These failures could place resident at risk of not having abuse, neglect, exploitation allegations reported. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/16/2024 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, type-2 diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder and depression disorder with a BIMS score of 00 (severely impaired cognition). Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for one of three halls (Hall 300) observed for daily living safely. The facility failed to ensure a shared bathroom on hall 300 was clean and sanitary for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary mattress for Bed B in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of unsanitary and unclean environment. Findings include: Observation on 07/16/2024 at 10:00 a.m., revealed a strong smell of urine from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation of Bed B revealed a sheetless mattress with a strong smell of urine which contained a wet circle. Observation of the shared bathroom with rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], revealed dried feces spread around the toilet seat and no toilet paper. Loose paper was observed on the floor in front of sink. Observation on 07/16/2024 at 11:30am revealed a strong smell of urine from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop or implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to provide a comprehensive and person-centered care plan for Resident #2 about resident's behaviors and preferences. This failure puts residents at risk of not being provided personalized care and negatively impact their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of unspecified dementia, bi-polar disorder (intense shifts in mood and energy levels), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing difficulty breathing), emphysema (lung condition that causes shortness of breath), and alcohol abuse. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 03 (severe cognitive impairment). Record review of Resident #2's care plan revealed problem start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 resident of 8 residents (Resident #5) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA G performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during incontinent care for Resident #5. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body), muscle wasting, and cerebral infarction (a condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is disrupted, causing tissue death in the brain). Resident #5's BIMS score of 10, which indicated Resident #5's cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #5 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (Resident #8) of fourteen residents on the secure unit, 300 wing reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure several doors in the secure unit were not found to be open and able to be secured, allowing residents possible access to hazardous chemicals stored in the janitors closet of the secure wing, and an activity supplies closet. This failure could expose residents to undue harm, chemical exposure or poisoning. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 12/16/23, revealed that the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, Unspecified Dementia, Diabetes mellitus, and Insomnia. Record review of Resident #8's Minimal Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and oral hygiene for one resident (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received showers per her shower schedule. This failure could place residents at risk of low self-esteem, anxiety, embarrassment, and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/16/23, revealed that the resident was an [AGE] year-old female, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following non-traumatic hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, Primary, admission (Paralysis of half of the body), Lack of coordination, Acute embolism, and thrombosis (obstruction of an artery or blood vessels), and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for one (Dietary [NAME] J) of two dietary staff reviewed for qualifications. 1. The facility failed to employ a qualified Dietary Manager. 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] J had a current food handlers license. This failure could place the residents at risk of not being provided a nutritional well-balanced diet and not have their dietary needs identified and addressed. Findings included: Interview on 07/18/23 at 09:45 AM with Dietary [NAME] J revealed she was by herself after 2pm, no dietary aide or dishwasher during the week. Dietary [NAME] J stated the facility had been without a Dietary Manager for 3 weeks. Interview on 07/20/23 at 1:15 PM with Administrator revealed the Dietary Manager quit last month. The Administrator stated they were currently looking for a Dietary Manager. Record Review of Dietary [NAME] J's employee file reflected her date of hire was 01/20/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review of the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored canned goods, had an uncompromised seal, free from dents. 2. The facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen and dry storage were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 3. The facility failed to ensure that two of three refrigerators and two freezers' outsides were free from dirt, dust and dead bugs/pests. 4. The facility failed to discard items stored in reach-in refrigerator, kitchen area or dry storage that were not properly labeled or past the 'best buy', consume by or expiration dates. 5. The facility failed to ensure the handwashing sink was free from leaking/running water (hot side). 6. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen remained free of bugs and insects (pests). 7.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition for residents in one of one dining room and 300 hall reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure dining room air conditioning was working properly to maintain safe and comfortable air temperatures for residents in the dining room. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #99 and #41 had working air conditioner in their room. 3. The facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and hall 300 had working air conditioner. The failure could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation and Interview on 07/18/23 at 10:06 AM with Resident #41 revealed it was hot in her room for the last 2 days. She stated facility was aware of it and gave 2 fans to try to keep the room cooler. Observation of Resident #41's room revealed it was warm and stuffy with 2 fans blowing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comfortable and safe temperature levels for 17 residents including five residents (#8, #41, #23, #38, #99) and 12 residents in confidential group interview) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure dining room air conditioning was working properly to maintain safe and comfortable air temperatures for residents in the dining room. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #99 and #41 had working air conditioner in their room. The failure could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation and Interview on 07/18/23 at 10:06 AM with Resident #41 revealed it was hot in her room for the last 2 days. She stated facility was aware of it and gave 2 fans to try to keep the room cooler. Observation of Resident #41's room revealed it was warm and stuffy with 2 fans blowing. Observation and Interview on 07/18/23 at 11:50 AM revealed the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to provide RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily on Saturdays and Sundays in May to July 2023. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN-specific nursing activities. Findings included: Record Review of facility's timesheets and sign in sheets for staff for May 2023 to June 2023 reflected the following: -05/06/23 reflected LVNs E, L, T and ZC worked at facility -05/07/23 reflected LVNs L, T and ZC worked at facility -05/13/23 reflected LVNs T, R Agency LVN S, and Agency LVN T worked at facility -05/14/23 reflected LVN P, LVN R, Agency LVN S and Agency LVN ZB worked at facility. -05/20/23 reflected LVN E, LVN T, LVN ZC and Agency LVN U -05/21/23 reflected LVN E, LVN T, LVN ZC and Agency LVN U -05/27/23 reflected LVN L, LVN R, Agency LVN S and Agency LVN V -05/28/23 reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for two (Residents #28 and #7) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. Agency LVN A failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions to [NAME] the Novolin R Insulin (Hormone) Pen prior to dialing in required amount of Insulin to be administered to Resident #28. 2. LVN B failed to follow the procedure for accurate administration of Resident #7's Flonase (corticosteroids to treat allergy's) Nasal Spray. LVN B did not ensure Resident #7 cleared his nasal passages before use. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medication. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #28's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident had a BIMs of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's medical director or his/her designee attended the QAPI meetings for one of one facility, reviewed for QAPI, in that: The facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended QAPI meetings since 09/23/22. This failure placed residents at risk for quality deficiencies being unidentified and no appropriate plans of actions developed or implemented. Findings include: Review of the facility's QAPI meeting sign in sheets for July 2022 to June 2023 reflected QAPI meetings were held monthly. The QAPI meeting sign in sheet dated 09/23/22 reflected Medical Director met with facility QAPI. The Medical Director did not meet when facility had QAPI meetings in October 2022, 12/13/22, 1/19/23, 2/16/23, 3/16/23, 4/20/23, 5/16/23 and 6/29/23 with QAPI. Interview on 07/19/23 at 5:10 PM the Administrator stated there had only been one QAPI meeting since he started as the Administrator at the facility. He stated the Medical Director did not attend the June QAPI meeting. He stated the DON went over information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for three (Resident #28, Resident #35, and Resident#7) of six residents and four of six staff members reviewed for infection control. 1. Agency LVN A failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care for Resident # 28. 2. CNA C and CNA D failed to perform hand hygiene after performing ADL care and mechanical lift transfer on Resident # 28 and before leaving the resident's room. 3. LVN B failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #35 and Resident #7. These failures could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: 1. Observation on 07/18/23 at 10:05 a.m. revealed CNA C and CNA D completing ADL care on Resident #28 and placing him on mechanical lift sling in preparation to transfer from bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review. the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for dining room and three of four resident halls (200, 300 hall and 400 hall) reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure the secure unit (300 hall) common area was maintained with floorboards in place and the wall not exposed. One of two doors in common area did not have a door sealant in place. 2. The facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s closet ceiling was not leaking and had blackish stains on ceiling. 3. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms' 404 and 406 had a shower in working order. 4. The facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a working air conditioner which did not leak. 5. The facility failed to ensure hall 200 overhead lights were free of dead bugs. 6.The facility failed to ensure resident common area at end of 400 hall was kept clean and window seals were cleaned. These failures placed residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented so the facility was free of pests and rodents for the facility's dining room and three of four halls (Halls 200, 300 and 400) reviewed for pest control. 1. The facility failed to keep an effective pest control program to ensure dining room was free of flies, gnats and spiders. The facility failed to ensure bug zapper in dining room was serviced and not full of flies and gnat. The facility failed to ensure ice machine was free of dead gnat. 2. The facility failed to ensure hall 300 and dining area for hall 300 was free of bugs. 3. The facility failed to ensure halls 200 and 400 were free of bug activity. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Observations during residents' lunch on 07/18/23 at 12:18 PM in dining room revealed in front of the 2nd set of sliding doors from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #28) of two resident reviewed for catheter care. CNA C and CNA D failed to keep Resident #28's urine catheter bag below the level of the bladder during a mechanical lift transfer. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #28's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident had a BIMs of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident had a foley catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. He required extensive two-person assistance for transfers and had infection of the foot. Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem), paraplegia (paralysis of lower body), multiple sclerosis (nervous system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$99,075 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $52,848 — penalty dated 2025-06-06
- $46,227 — penalty dated 2024-07-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTY OF THROCKMORTON | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2018 |
| 1900 O'NEAL STREET PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| GOBER, KIRBY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2018 |
| 1900 O'NEAL STREET OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WATSON, NATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| CLEMENS, ERIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675067. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.