Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 6) who were reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure two staff were present and bed rails were provided during incontinent care (providing support for individuals who cannot control their bladder or bowels) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 let go of Resident 6, with no bed rail to hold onto. Resident 6 fell out of bed and sustained fracture of the surgical neck of the left humerus with fracture line extension to the greater tuberosity (left shoulder fracture).During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR) dated 1/5/26, the AR indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, and morbid obesity (severe obesity, excessive fat stores and a body mass index of 40 or higher (BMI, a measure of body fat based on height and weight, normal BMI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool to drive resident care plan) for four of seven sampled residents (Resident 42, 49, 52, and 64) when residents' tobacco use was incorrectly coded as No on the MDS despite evidence of tobacco use. This failure resulted in an inaccurate reflection of the residents' smoking status and had the potential to affect the development and implantation of resident-centered care plans.During a review of the admission Records (ARs) for Resident 42, 49, 52, and 64, printed on 1/7/25, the records indicated that these residents were admitted to the facility on [DATE], 12/3/25, 5/16/24, and 11/7/24, respectively.During observations on 1/6/26 and 1/7/26 at 11:35 a.m., Residents 42, 49, 52 and 64 were observed smoking on the recreation patio in Special Treatment Program (STP) unit.During an interview on 1/6/25 at 11:45 a.m., unit supervisor, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0800 — pattern
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete diet manual reference for all diets provided in the facility.This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving diets that do not match physicians' orders. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/06/2026 at 11:28 a.m. with Restorative Nursing Assistant/ Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (RNA/CNA 1) at the nursing station, RNA/CNA 1 could not locate the diet manual. Once RNA/CNA 1 received assistance, she was able to locate the manual. RNA/CNA 1 stated that she could not locate the information for the soft and bite size (SB6) diet in the diet manual. RNA/CNA 1 stated that she would not know where to find the information if she had questions about the diet.During a review of the facility's Generations Diet Manual for Bayberry Community, dated 10/20/25, the diet manual did not include information on the puree, soft and bite size (SB6) and minced and moist diets.During a review of the facility's Diet Spreadsheet (a sheet containing the kind…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide mechanically altered foods according to the menu for SB6 diets (a therapeutic, texture-modified eating plan for individuals with swallowing difficulties, weak chewing muscles, or high choking risks).This failure had the potential to result in decreased satisfaction with food and/or decreased nutrient intake for one out of six (Resident 26) residents receiving SB6 diets.Findings:During a review of Diet Spreadsheet, dated Tuesday Week 2 Day 11, the diet spreadsheet indicated the SB6 diet served for lunch was beef stroganoff (minced), egg noodles (chopped), spinach (chopped), white bread (slurry), cookie (chopped).During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/06/2026 at 12 p.m. with DC in the kitchen during trayline, Resident 26's tray contained chopped pieces 1/2 inch in length of beef stroganoff, chopped macaroni noodles, chopped spinach, slurry bread and a regular cookie. DC stated that the items on the tray do not match the diet spreadsheet for SB6 diet.During a review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to prepare foods in a form designed to meet individual needs, as hard candy was found on resident's meal tray with a physician's order for SB6 diet (a therapeutic, texture-modified eating plan for individuals with swallowing difficulties, weak chewing muscles, or high choking risks). These failures had the potential to result in difficulty swallowing, chewing, and a decrease in food and nutrient intake in one out of six (Resident 26) residents receiving SB6 diets.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/2026 at 12:24 p.m. with Resident 26 in her room, the lunch meal tray was on the bedside table in front of the resident. The meal tray contained all appropriate items in addition to two pieces of wrapped hard candy. Resident 26 stated The people who brought me the tray brought me the candy.During an observation on 1/5/2026 at 12:26 p.m. in Resident 26's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse 8 (LVN 8) walked in the room, delivered a container of Ensure (oral nutritional drink to help…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary environment when:1. Gloves were not used appropriately;2. Food preparation equipment and utensils were not clean or in good working condition;3. Ice machine bin was dirty and not cleaned per manufacturer instructions;These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food, food preparation equipment, and utensils used for food and/or leading to food borne illness for 78 residents who received food from the kitchen with a total census of 78.1.During an observation on 1/06/2026 at 12 p.m. in the kitchen during meal tray line, Dietary Aide (DA) used his gloved hands to touch a container of oil, handles on refrigerator, dial on stove and then touched ready to eat hamburger buns and cheese.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Food Preparation, dated 2023, the P&P indicated, plastic gloves should be worn to avoid direct contact with food.Hands must be washed prior to putting on gloves and any glove changes.During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure:Residents had a location to safely store perishable foods.Residents' food was separated from facility food.This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses from unsafe food storage, decreased food intake and did not provide a homelike environment for 78 residents who consumed food out of a total census of 78.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/05/2026 at 10:00 a.m. with DC in the kitchen, it was observed that a resident's popsicles were stored in the reach in freezer in the kitchen with facility food. DC stated that Nancy's popsicles are stored in the freezer for her to eat any time.During an interview on 1/05/2026 at 1:45 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA 4), CNA 4 stated, the facility does not have a refrigerator, so perishable food must be consumed immediately. During an interview on 1/05/2026 at 1:55 p.m. with Registered Nurse Supervisor 2 (RNS 2), RNS 2 stated, there isn't a way to store perishable food. RNS 2 stated residents must consume…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview , and record review the facility failed to ensure safe infection prevention practices with census of 82 when: 1. Shared glucometer (device measuring blood sugar) was not cleaned and sanitized in-between resident care. 2. Licensed Nurse did not put on gloves before assessing Resident 14's swelling and redness to the Right eye. These unsafe practices could result in spread of infection among vulnerable elderly residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation with Licensed Nurse (LVN 6), on 1/5/26, at 4:06 PM, at the Station 1 hallway, LVN 6 was observed placing a glucometer and supplies in a small tray and was taken into Resident 6's room to measure blood sugar (or BG). LVN 6 placed the tray on top of bedside table, then with gloved hand poked Resident 6's right index finger with lancet (a pricking device) to get drops of blood and then soaked the test strip (a small strip transmits blood content to glucometer machine) attached to the glucometer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe pharmaceutical services with census of 82 residents when:Non-narcotic prescription drugs destruction was not witnessed by two licensed staff from April 2025 to August 2025.Hazardous drugs (or HD, medication that can cause harm posing risks to healthcare workers and patients through exposure during handling) were not stored and handled safely in the medication carts and during medication administration.These failed practices had the potential to result in drug diversion (unauthorized drug use) and unsafe drug handling for both staff and residents.Findings1. During an interview and record review, with Licensed Nurse (LVN 9), on 1/5/26 at 10:29 a.m., in Med Room on Station 2, LVN 9 stated non-narcotic prescription medications were disposed every 2 weeks and logged in the non-narcotic drug logbook. LVN 9 stated the disposal of non-narcotic drug form required only a one-person signature. LVN 9 confirmed there was only one signature on the non-narcotic drug disposal for April 2025 through August…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medication use parameters ordered by the doctor were followed in 3 out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 6, and Resident 9) when:Resident 4's blood sugar parameters for insulin (drug in shot form to treat blood sugar disease) were not followed as ordered by medical doctor.Resident 6's opioid medication use did not follow the pain level ordered by the medical doctor.Resident 9's blood pressure drug parameter was not followed.These failed practices could contribute to unsafe medication use and residents not benefiting from prescribed medication and/or experience side effects.1. During a record review of the Resident 4's Order Summary Report, dated 1/8/26, the record indicated the following orders: NovoLOG Flex Pen Subcutaneous (or SC, inject under the skin) solution Pen-Injector (or Flex Pen, a pen shaped insulin container) . (insulin Aspart, a short acting insulin): Inject 3 units subcutaneously with meals . hold if patient doesn't eat meal; Start date: 10/21/25 (Novolog is a type on insulin, unit is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medications and supplies with expired, unlabeled and comingled drugs in the medication's rooms and medication carts with resident census of 82.These unsafe practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced potency and may contribute to medication errors.During an observation and concurrent interview, on 1/5/26 at 10:35 a.m., with License Vocational Nurse (LVN 9), in medication room on Station 2 , the following were observed:i. Comingled medications with different routes of administration were stored on the same shelf with no dividers. Medication included liquid prescription drugs, non-prescription pills were stored side by side with topical product such as topical head lice drug along with enema and rectal suppositories.ii. Expired medications and supplements were stored in the cabinets included: packages of Beneprotein (instant protein powder) with expiration date of 5/2025, Ingress (drug for movement disorder) with expiration date of 12/06/25, Nicotine gum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA