Lompoc Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 324 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its facility policy to re-weigh residents with a five percent (5%) or greater weight loss and immediately notify the Registered Dietician (RD) in writing for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's increased weight loss, worsening malnutrition (not getting enough healthy food or nutrients), delayed medical treatment, and adverse consequences as evidenced by slower healing of pressure sores. Findings: Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 7th Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing, page 243 in the section titled, Data Documentation indicates, Observation and recording of client status is a legal and professional responsibility. The nurse practice acts in all states and the American Nurses Association Nursing's Social Policy Statement (2003) mandate, or require, accurate data collection and recording as independent functions essential to the role of the professional nurse. During a review of Resident 1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure standard and transmission-based precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infections when: 1. A Foley catheter bag (urine collection bag) was not touching the floor in one of three residents (Resident 1). 2. Staff didn't follow handwashing protocol per infection control standards to provide hand hygiene to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) and one unsampled resident (Resident 2) before serving lunch meal trays. These facility failures had the potential to transmit and spread infection to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (a break in the bone between the hip and thigh bone), acute kidney failure (decline kidney function), pressure ulcers on right and left buttock and on the sacral region (injuries to the skin and underlying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, (Resident 62), self-administration of medication was with interdisciplinary team (IDT- healthcare professionals from different specialties working together to provide patient care) approval and determination as clinically safe and appropriate. This failure had the potential for Resident 62 to unsafely self-administer medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 9:47 a.m., with Resident 62, a rescue inhaler labeled Atrovent HFA (medication that relaxes muscles in the airways, 17 mcg (microgram -unit of measure) was observed inside Resident 62's bedside table drawer. Resident 62 stated the inhaler was brought from home to use as a back-up when going outside the facility to smoke. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 9:48 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN2), LN2 stated not being aware of the presence of the inhaler in Resident 62's drawer. LN 2 further stated Resident 62 did not have approval from the physician and the IDT team to self-administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to have the most current survey results accessible to the public, in the facility survey results binder. This facility failure denied the opportunity for residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents, to be aware of the most recent survey results. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25, with the Administrator (ADM) inside the facility's main entrance, the facility's survey results binder was reviewed. The most current survey results in the binder were from 3/15/24. The survey results binder lacked the survey results from 4/8/24 through 1/30/25. The ADM acknowledged the survey results binder was not current and verbalized the survey results binder would need to be updated. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure tilted Survey Results, Examination of dated 4/7, indicated in part A copy of the most recent standard survey, including any subsequent extended surveys, follow-up revisits reports, etc., along with state approved plans of correction of noted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan (a document that summarizes how a patient's needs will be met, and their care will be managed) interventions for call lights, for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 44) when: 1. Resident 44's call light was out of reach, on the floor. 2. Resident 17's call light was out of reach. These failures had the potential for Resident 44 and Resident 17's needs to go unmet by staff. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/19/25 at 10:06 a.m. Resident 44's call light was observed on the floor and out of reach of Resident 44. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 10:22 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2), CNA 2 confirmed and verbalized Resident 44's call light was on the floor and out of reach of Resident 44. During a review of Resident 44's Care Plan Report undated, indicated in part, Resident 44 was at risk for falls with an approach to Ensure call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. 2. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for three of 23 sampled residents (Resident 93, Resident 32, and Resident 12) when the facility staff did not: 1. Check Resident 93's blood pressure prior to the administration of hydralazine (a medication used to treat blood pressure). This failure had the potential for Resident 93 to receive Hydralazine, against physician orders, secondary to no monitoring. 2. Weigh Resident 32 per physician orders. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 32's heart condition. 3. Check Resident 12's blood pressure prior to the administration of Lisinopril (a medication used to treat blood pressure). This failure had the potential for Resident 12 to receive Lisinopril, without following the precautionary parameters ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 7th Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing, page 419 in the section titled, Legal Implications in Nursing Practice indicates, Nurses are obligated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency drugs were available to residents when ordered. The facilities Emergency Drug Supply Kit (E-Kit) was not re-ordered timely after being opened for use. This failure had the potential for emergency drugs to not be available during an emergency. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 1:27 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) in the medication storage room, one opened E-Kit was observed in the refrigerator room with red locks. The DSD stated a red lock indicates an E-Kit has been opened by facility staff, and the nurse who opened it should have reordered it that same day. During an interview on 2/21/25 at 1:58 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated the last time the E-Kit was ordered was in August 2024. There was no other documented evidence that the refrigerator E-kit was reordered from the time it was opened to 2/19/25. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Emergency Medications, dated April 2021, the P&P…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as directed and ordered when: 1. Resident 72 was not given /administered with Insulin (a medication to lower blood sugar levels) when the resident's blood sugar level /reading went above the parameter set by the physician. 2. Resident 42 was not administred with Diltiazem (medication for high blood pressure )when the resident's blood pressure level was above the parameter set by the physician. These failures had the potential medication errors secondary to non administration as ordered. Findings: 1. During review of Resident 72's admission Record (AD), the AD indicated Resident 72 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include non-pressure chronic pressure ulcer of left heel and midfoot (a persistent, open sore located on the left heel and middle part of the foot that develops due to underlying conditions like poor circulation or diabetes), type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis (a life-threatening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Six opened nebulizer (turns medicine into a mist) medications were labeled with opened dates for two sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 94) and three unsampled residents (Resident 43, Resident 103, and Resident 463) per facility policy. 2. Three expired test strips in one medication cart were discarded and not readily available for staff use. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired and ineffective medications. Findings: 1. a. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:14 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) in the nurses' station, the following liquid inhalation medication solution packets were observed to be unlabeled and undated: D1 Medication Cart One Albuterol packet for Resident 463. One DuoNeb packet for Resident 463. Three Budesonide packets for Resident 103. A1 Medication Cart Two Budesonide packets for Resident 43. One DuoNeb packet for Resident 11. C2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records for three out of 23 residents (Resident 17, 37, 94) accurately documented POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (gives instructions for care in life-threatening medical situations) information in the electronic medical record (EMR) when: 1. Resident 94's POLST did not match the electronic health record. 2. Resident 37's POLST did not match the electronic health record. 3. Resident 17's POLST did not match the electronic health record. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 17, 37, and 94 not receiving their desired preferences for end of life care. 1. During a review of Resident 's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 94 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (inadequate breathing) and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - lung condition caused by inflammation that limits airflow into and out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,893 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $1,748 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA